ELLIOT LAKE News

Political INcorrect Constructs Arranged To Awaken Slumbering Minds…

Archive for the month “January, 2007”

N.W.O. Plans For US

Aaron Russo, 2006 at Cannes Film Festival. Tak...

Aaron Russo

es its mark
By Paul Joseph Watson

By Paul Watson

Hollywood director and documentary film maker Aaron Russo has gone in-depth on the astounding admissions of Nick Rockefeller, who personally told him that the elite’s ultimate goal was to create a micro-chipped population and that the war on terror was a hoax, Rockefeller having predicted an “event” that would trigger the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan eleven months before 9/11.

Rockefeller also told Russo that his family’s foundation had created and bankrolled the women’s liberation movement in order to destroy the family and that population reduction was a fundamental aim of the global elite.

Russo is perhaps best known for producing Trading Places starring Eddie Murphy but was more recently in the spotlight for his exposé of the criminal run for profit federal reserve system, the documentary

Currently undergoing more treatment in his fight against cancer (He lost his battle with cancer on August 24/07), Russo made time for a sit down interview with radio host and fellow documentary film maker Alex Jones in which he dropped bombshell after bombshell on what Rockefeller had told him about the direction the world was being steered towards by the global elite.

After his popular video Mad As Hell was released and he began his campaign to become Governor of Nevada, Russo was noticed by Rockefeller and introduced to him by a female attorney. Seeing Russo‘s passion and ability to affect change, Rockefeller set about on a subtle mission to recruit Russo into the elite.

During one conversation, Rockefeller asked Russo if he was interested in joining the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) but Russo rejected the invitation, saying he had no interest in “enslaving the people” to which Rockefeller coldly questioned why he cared about the “serfs.”

“I used to say to him what’s the point of all this,” states Russo, “you have all the money in the world you need, you have all the power you need, what’s the point, what’s the end goal?” to which Rockefeller replied (paraphrasing), “The end goal is to get everybody chipped, to control the whole society, to have the bankers and the elite people control the world.” Rockefeller even assured Russo that if he joined the elite his chip would be specially marked so as to avoid undue inspection by the authorities.

Russo states that Rockefeller told him, “Eleven months before 9/11 happened there was going to be an event and out of that event we were going to invade Afghanistan to run pipelines through the Caspian sea, we were going to invade Iraq to take over the oil fields and establish a base in the Middle East, and we’d go after Chavez in Venezuela.”

Rockefeller also told Russo that he would see soldiers looking in caves in Afghanistan and Pakistan for Osama bin Laden and that there would be an “Endless war on terror where there’s no real enemy and the whole thing is a giant hoax,”so that “the government could take over the American people,” according to Russo, who said that Rockefeller was cynically laughing and joking as he made the astounding prediction.

In a later conversation, Rockefeller asked Russo what he thought women’s liberation was about. Russo‘s response that he thought it was about the right to work and receive equal pay as men, just as they had won the right to vote, caused Rockefeller to laughingly retort, You’re an idiot! Let me tell you what that was about, we the Rockefeller’s funded that, we funded women’s lib, we’re the one’s who got all of the newspapers and television – the Rockefeller Foundation.”

Rockefeller told Russo of two primary reasons why the elite bankrolled women’s lib, one because before women’s lib the bankers couldn’t tax half the population and two because it allowed them to get children in school at an earlier age, enabling them to be indoctrinated into accepting the state as the primary family, breaking up the traditional family model.

This revelation dovetails previous admissions on behalf of feminist pioneer Gloria Steinem that the CIA bankrolled Ms. Magazine as part of the same agenda of breaking up traditional family models.

Rockefeller was often keen to stress his idea that “the people have to be ruled” by an elite and that one of the tools of such power was population reduction, that there were “too many people in the world,” and world population numbers should be reduced by at least half.

One issue which has spiraled out of control of the elite according to Rockefeller’s conversations with Russo, is the Israel-Palestine conflict, with serious thinking at one stage revolving around the bizarre notion of giving Israeli citizens one million dollars each and relocating them all in the state of Arizona.

Listen HERE while you re-read this important post again.

Prison Planet

David Rockefeller at the Bilderberg conference in Baden-Baden, Germany, June 1991:

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during these years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government which will never again know war, but only peace and prosperity for the whole of humanity. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in the past centuries.”

ALSO READ:

Feminist Dupes

Feminism Has Communist Roots

Radical Feminists Are Useful Idiots

************************************

British School Indoctrination

45 Declared Communist Goals

America – As The Grip Tightens

********************************

How Britain Destroyed Itself

Pawns In The Game

KOREAN WAR Was A Sham

****************************

German Government Promoting INCEST

The Harold Rosenthal Interview (Part 1)

Create an email alert for elliot lake blogurl:http://elliotlakenews.wordpress.com

Wars By Design

rakovsky.jpg

Rakovsky in uniform

Rakovsky in Uniform

By Henry Makow Ph.D.

Incredible and bizarre as it sounds, humanity is indeed the victim of a diabolical conspiracy. War, depression and genocide in the past century were not accidental or inevitable but the result of malevolent design.

Shocking evidence is a 1938 Stalinist police (NKVD) interrogation of a founder of the Communist International, Christian G. Rakovsky, 65, who was facing execution for plotting to overthrow Stalin. The 50-page transcript of his interrogation, dubbed “The Red Symphony,” was not meant to become public. It confirms that the Rothschild-Illuminati planned to use Communism to establish a world dictatorship of the super rich. This is perhaps the most explosive political document in modern history. It reveals why the Illuminati created Hitler and then sought to destroy him, and why Stalin made a pact with Hitler in 1939.

Christian Rakovsky was a veteran Communist insider. Born Chaim Rakeover in 1873, he studied medicine in France before becoming a revolutionary. He was the leader of a terror group that attacked government officials. In 1919, Lenin put him in charge of the Soviet Ukraine government. He successfully kept the area for the Bolsheviks during the Civil War. Stalin appointed him Russian ambassador to Paris in 1925. Rakovsky belonged to the powerful Trotskyite faction that took their orders from the Rothschilds. Many of this group were shot in Stalin’s 1937 Communist Party purge.

The circumstances of the midnight interrogation Jan. 26, 1938 were very dramatic. What could Rakovsky possibly say to save his life? Rakovsky appears to use the tactic of “deceiving with the truth.” He wins trust by revealing the truth but leaves some of it out. He tries to impress his interrogator that he and Trotsky represent an invincible power he calls the “Capitalist-Communist Financial International.” He confirms that the “revolutionary movement” was designed to enlist support by pretending to serve mankind’s moral and collective ideals. The real aim however is to give total world power to the bankers by dividing society and undermining established authority. “Revolution” really means, “overturning” Western civilization.

“Christianity is our only real enemy since all the political and economic phenomena of the bourgeois states are only its consequences,” Rakovsky, says. (Griffin, p. 264) Peace is “counter-revolutionary” since it is war that paves the way for revolution. Rakovsky, whose tongue was loosened by a mild inebriant in his wine, refers to the Illuminati as “they” or “them.” He is a member although not part of the inner circle. He explains that the “Illuminati” is a Masonic secret society dedicated to Communism. Significantly, its founder Adam Weishaupt took the name from “the second anti-Christian conspiracy of that era, gnosticism.” (249)

[…]

The interrogation, conducted in French lasted from midnight until 7 a.m. After, Kus’min ordered Landowsky to translate the interview into Russian and make two copies. The content was so mind boggling that Landowsky made an additional carbon for himself. “I am not sorry that I had the courage for this,” he wrote. (279) (The Bolsheviks had shot Landowsky’s father, a Tsarist colonel, during the 1917 revolution.) A Spanish Fascist volunteer later found the manuscript on Landowsky’s dead body in a hut on the Petrograd front during World War Two. He took it back to Spain where it was published as “Sinfonia en Rojo Mayo.” in 1949.

The complete text of “The Red Symphony” was put online by Peter Myers. The transcript was published in English in 1968 as “The Red Symphony: X-Ray of Revolution.” You can find it in Des Griffin’s “Fourth Reich of the Rich.” (1988) I recommend this book and everything this fine man has written.

Rakovsky gives his interrogator an astonishing inside view of modern history in order to prove that his sponsors control the world. “Money is the basis of power,” Rakovsky says, and the Rothschilds manufacture it thanks to the banking system. The “Revolutionary Movement” was an attempt by Meyer Rothschild and his allies to protect and extend this monopoly by establishing a totalitarian New World Order.

According to Rakovsky, “The Rothschilds were not the treasurers, but the chiefs of that first secret Communism…Marx and the highest chiefs of the First International … were controlled by Baron Lionel Rothschild, [1808-1878] whose revolutionary portrait was done by Disraeli the English Premier, who was also his creature, and has been left to us [in Disraeli's novel 'Coningsby.']” (250)

Lionel’s son Nathaniel (1840-1915) needed to overthrow the Christian Romanoff Dynasty. Through his agents Jacob Schiff and the Warburg brothers, he financed the Japanese side in the Russo Japanese War and an unsuccessful insurrection in Moscow in 1905.

Then he instigated the First World War (Trotsky was behind the murder of Archduke Ferdinand) and financed the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution. Rakovsky says he was personally involved in the transfer of funds in Stockholm. (251-252)

The Jewish labour movement or “bund” was Rothschild’s instrument. The Bund’s “secret faction” infiltrated all the socialist parties in Russia and provided the leadership for the Russian Revolution. Alexander Kerensky, the Menshevik Prime Minister was a secret member. (253) Leon Trotsky was supposed to become the leader of the USSR.

Trotsky, a Jew, married the daughter of one of Rothschild’s closest associates, banker Abram Zhivotovsky and became part of the “clan.”Unfortunately “national” Communists like Lenin (one-quarter Jewish) got in the way. Lenin overruled Trotsky and made peace with Germany (Treaty of Brest Litovsk, 1918.) This was not the Rothschild’s plan.

World War One was supposed to end the way the Second World War did. Russia was supposed to overrun Germany in 1918 and assist local “revolutionaries” in establishing a “peoples’ republic.” Trotsky was responsible for an attempt to assassinate Lenin in 1918 but Lenin survived.

When Lenin had a stroke in 1922, Trotsky had Levin, Lenin’s Jewish doctor, finish him off. At this critical moment, the unexpected happened. Trotsky got sick and Stalin was able to take power. At this crucial juncture, the Trotskyites pretended to support Stalin and infiltrated his regime in order to sabotage it.

Rakowsky characterizes Stalin as a “Bonapartist,” a nationalist as opposed to an International Communist like Trotsky. “He is a killer of the revolution, he does not serve it, but makes use of its service; he represents the most ancient Russian imperialism, just as Napoleon identified himself with the Gauls…” (257)

In order to control Stalin, international finance was forced to build up Hitler and the Nazi party. Rakowsky confirms that Jewish financiers backed the Nazis although Hitler was not aware of this.

“The ambassador Warburg presented himself under a false name and Hitler did not even guess his race… he also lied regarding whose representative he was… Our aim was to provoke a war and Hitler was war…[the Nazis] received…millions of dollars sent to it from Wall Street, and millions of marks from German financiers through Schacht; [providing] the upkeep of the S.A and the S.S. and also the financing of the elections…” (259-260)

Unfortunately for the bankers, Hitler also proved intractable. He started to print his own money!

“He took over for himself the privilege of manufacturing money and not only physical moneys, but also financial ones; he took over the untouched machinery of falsification and put it to work for the benefit of the state… Are you capable of imagining what would have come …if it had infected a number of other states and brought about the creation of a period of autarchy [absolute rule, replacing that of the bankers]. If you can, then imagine its counterrevolutionary functions…” (263)

Hitler had now become a bigger threat than Stalin, who had not meddled with money. Rakovsky’s present mission was to convince Stalin to make a pact with Hitler and turn Hitler’s aggression against the West.

The purpose was for Germany and the Western nations to exhaust each other before another front was opened in the East.

[According to Walter Kravitsky, the head of Soviet Military Intelligence in Europe who defected to the West and was later assassinated in 1941, Stalin was determined to make a pact with Hitler as early as 1934. He had no desire to fight the Nazis. Is it possible Rakovsky and his sponsors did not know this? Kravitsky On Stalin's Secret Service (1939)]

Rakovsky urged the Russians to use the tactic of “deceiving with the truth.” The Russians were to impress Hitler with their genuine desire for peace. Hitler was not to suspect that he was being set up for a war on two fronts. Stalin was given a choice. If he agreed to divide Poland with Hitler, the West would declare war on only one aggressor, Germany. If he refused, the bankers would allow Hitler to depose him.

Kus’min demanded some high level confirmation. Rakovsky told him to see Joseph Davies, the US ambassador in Moscow, a fellow Freemason and representative of the International Communist Roosevelt administration.

Someone was sent to Davies who confirmed that “much would be gained” if Rakovsky got an amnesty. On March 2, 1938, a powerful radio message was sent to Moscow in the cipher of its London embassy. “Amnesty or the Nazi danger will increase,” it said. Davies attended Rakovsky’s trial and gave him a Masonic greeting. On the same day, March 12, 1938, Hitler marched into Austria.

Rakovsky’s death sentence was commuted. Some believe he lived out his years under an assumed name. Another source has him shot in 1941. Secret negotiations were begun with Hitler.

The result was the Ribbentrop-Molotov pact signed in August 1939 just one week before the invasion of Poland. The interrogation seems to have created an accord between Stalin and the Illuminati.


RUSSIA STRUGGLES IN ROTHSCHILD CLUTCH

Europe and the United States long ago succumbed to Rothschild Illuminati control. In Russia, there are still some death spasms.

Recently, Vladimir Putin arrested Mikhail Khordordovsky, the head of Russia‘s largest oil company “Yukos” and “the richest man in Russia.”

Putin announced that Russia would seize his $12 billion 26% stake in the oil company, one of many national assets plundered in the reorganization of Communism [18] years ago. Then we learn the shares already had passed to none other than banker Jacob Rothschild under a “previously unknown arrangement” designed for such a circumstance. The two have known each other for years “through their mutual love of the arts.”

Rakovsky told Kus’min that the Illuminati never take political or financial positions. They use ‘intermediaries.’ “Bankers and politicians are only men of straw…. even though they occupy high places and appear to be authors of the plans which are carried out…” (248-249)

[…]

Read full article here: http://savethemales.ca/000275.html

ALSO READ:

Eisenhower’s Death Camps AFTER WWII

Diary Reveals U.S. Camp Horrors

Dresden’s 14 Hours Of HELL

Some Forgotten Post-War History
Luftwaffe Pilot SPARED B-17 Pilot’s Life
Pawns In The Game
Lester B. Pearson — A Communist Spy?

KOREAN WAR Was A Sham

American Dissident Says It All

The Dumbest Immigration Policy

By Theodore Dalyrymple

The multiculturalist liberal believes that all cultures are equal, except for his own, which is uniquely wicked and imperialist. Assimilation, in his view, would be yet another despicable instance of cultural imperialism—but, of course, it would also throw doubt upon his own world outlook, which he has adopted precisely to establish his own superior [racist?] broad-mindedness and tolerance.

After all, my Indian medical students who know Shakespeare and speak what used to be called the King’s English, might suggest to him that the very people whose culture he claims to defend often see great value in the culture (to say nothing of the institutions) he is defending them from, and that therefore his presuppositions are profoundly mistaken.

Keeping foreigners in cultural ghettos is thus a necessity for him, if he is to preserve his self-regard. And it is not difficult to find bureaucratic entrepreneurs in every group (that is to say, the “community leaders“) whose personal interests coincide with his own. There are fortunes to be made even in a ghetto.

Of course, if all cultures are equal, migration is itself a mystery, since it occurs (at least en masse) in one direction only.

To preserve the division of the world into victims and victimizers, therefore, it is intellectually imperative to keep migrants in a state of the most complete dependence possible. And that is precisely what British [Canadian & U.S.] immigration policies seems designed to do, at least when seen from close up.

The last thing liberals need or want is sturdily self-reliant people who don’t require their help.

ALSO READ:

The Age of Lies

Duped By Multiculturalism

Full Article here:

http://www.city-journal.org/html/11_1_oh_to_be.html

Short Definition of “Political-Correctness”

By Theodore Dalrymple

Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same [intentional] effect.

ALSO:

Political-Correctness – What IS it?

Britain’s “Common Purpose”

Group Differences Are Real

By Thomas Sowell

Is it just a stereotype that some groups do better at some things than other groups do? Do blacks not really play basketball any better than whites? Do our eyes deceive us when we notice the racial make-up of the NBA?

Is it just a coincidence that people of German ancestry produce the leading brands of beer in the United States–and the leading brand of beer in China, not to mention Germany‘s position as the leading beer producer in Europe? Can anyone deny that people of Italian ancestry have long been over-represented among the world’s leading figures in music–classical and popular, vocal and instrumental?

It is one thing to say that everyone should be equal before the law or is entitled to equal opportunity. It is something else to deny the most blatant facts before our eyes, and insist on a dogma of equality of performance, when virtually every individual or group is better at some things than at others.

More is involved than incidental pious nonsense. Such ideological make-believe has come to dominate public policy and even judicial decisions in the highest courts in the land. Statistical disparities among groups are routinely equated with discrimination, as if there could not possibly be any differences in behavior or performance among the groups themselves.

It gets worse. Whole nations and civilizations are equated, despite enormous disparities between them. People may be living in air-conditioned homes with all the modern amenities in one culture and in huts and shacks without running water or adequate sewage disposal in another. People in one culture may have better health, longer life, more advanced technology, more stable government, and greater personal freedom and safety than others. Moreover, people from other cultures are constantly migrating to these cultures, which fashionable dogmas say are no better than the cultures they are leaving.

Those people who say that all cultures are equal never explain why the results of those cultures are so grossly unequal. Anything that goes against the prevailing social dogma is virtually certain to be dismissed as a stereotype.

Institutions that force-feed students the new trinity of race, class, and gender victimhood throughout the academic year are often unwilling to risk allowing even one lecture by a visiting spokesman for an opposing viewpoint.

Like the Communist regimes which electronically jammed broadcasts from the Voice of America during the Cold War, the new academic totalitarians apparently fear lest their years-long propaganda efforts be knocked over like a house of cards by one brief exposure to a few facts and a different vision.

http://www.issues-views.com

ALSO READ:

More Fall-Out On Black IQ

Controversial IQ Differences

Stagnating Black Countries

*******************************

Black American Author Rejects Roots

Scientific DNA Racial Profiling

IQ And The Wealth of Nations

Adjusted Uranium Prices Almost The Same

Photo: Denison Mines (Land Reclaimed)

 

Trust a reader with a long memory to weigh in with thoughts on today’s “high” uranium price. John Pursel of Wasaga Beach, Ontario, wrote:

“When I worked at Denison [Mines] in Elliot Lake in 1959 and 1960, the product price was US$10 per pound. In adjusted dollars that is equivalent to US$62 which is not far off the current spot price of US$72.

He added that had the owners of the Elliot Lake mines kept them on care and maintenance rather than allowing them to flood, they might be able to take advantage of today’s high prices. As things stand now, the mine water is a cocktail of acid, nitrates and radioactivity, by implication making the mines impractical to dewater.

– Canadian Mining Journal

Related article HERE.

CURRENT Uranium prices HERE.

Hate Crime Laws

2008 Hate Crime Survey, written by Human Right...

By Fulton Huxtable

Statist, n. One who believes in the principle or policy of concentrating extensive economic, political and related controls in the state at the cost of individual liberty.

One of the hallmarks of a totalitarian society is the imprisonment of individuals for their ideas.

Did you know that, in America, there are individuals serving prison time for their beliefs, for the ideas they hold? Don’t believe it? Read on.

In a free and just society, if you commit a crime, such as assault, you are punished for that act, not for the idea which motivated the act.

If an ignorant racist assaults someone, he is treated no differently than a better person who commits the same crime. The punishment is the same for both individuals. Assault is assault and the motive does not alter the nature of the act. Motive explains the act, it does not excuse, mitigate or make it worse.

One of the most ominous, dangerous moves by statists has been the enactment of legislation regarding so-called “hate” crime. With hate crime, you are punished not only for the act of assault but also for the idea which led to the assault.

Here’s how hate crime works. If you commit assault, let’s say the normal penalty is five years in prison. Under hate-crime laws, if you commit the assault because of “racist” ideas, or other bad ideas, then your penalty is “enhanced” with extra years in prison–and those extra years in prison are not for the act of assault but for the ideas which prompted the assault.

Forget racism’s irrational and odious nature, focus only on the precedent established by hate-crime legislation: you are to be punished, imprisoned, for holding a certain idea. It makes no difference that, so far, those receiving extra prison time are actual criminals. The fact remains these individuals, as reprehensible as they are, are serving prison time for their ideas.

It is no accident that actual criminals have been chosen as the initial target of hate crime. By selecting criminals who commit heinous acts, statists have successfully hidden their agenda.

It has enabled statists to smuggle into their legislation hate crime’s dangerous precedent, one which will gradually spread to areas other than real crime. It will be driven by an irresistible logic: if it is right for the state to criminalize one idea, it is right to criminalize any idea.

[e.g. author George Orwell's book -- nineteen-eighty-four]

Consider the other precedent established by hate crime: that it is a crime to hate. In a free society, hatred is not a crime. Those consumed by irrational hatred are free to act upon that hatred. There is only one prohibition: do not initiate force against another.

Hatred is an intense dislike of something. Hatred, like love, may be rational or irrational. If you love freedom, you hate enslavement. The hatred of those things which may destroy your values is perfectly rational. Such hatred is good.

Since the defining characteristic of hate is the intensity of your dislike of something, the campaign by the haters of hate is really an attempt to destroy your capacity for a passionate belief in anything, rendering you impotent to oppose them.

Create a nation of sheep, individuals incapable of loving or hating anything, a nation of docile, pliable people and you have the kind easily manipulated by statists.

With the precedent of jail time for bad ideas, and hate as a crime, statists will move with a vengeance against their enemies–those who love their freedom.

The use of “hate” will be selective. It may be a few years before journalists, writers–and you–are hauled off to jail for the crime of “hate,” but it is coming as long as the precedents of hate crime are accepted and codified in law.

http://www.issues-views.com/index.php/sect/1002/article/1201

Lawless Caledonia Garners Little Interest

Caledonia, Ontario

By Chris Robertshaw – Mississauga

It is with great interest and confusion that I continue to read letters from readers who are dismayed with Commissioner Fantino’s most recent “policies”.

The [three] that come to mind, and seemingly in their order of reader’s importance are: Cam Woolley, Cruiser Colours and the almost non-existent “2 Tier” Policing policy in Caledonia.

Having once appreciated Mr. Fantino’s tough stand on policing and his apparent fair approach to the latter, I now see he has succumbed to political aspirations and/or correctness. How else could you interpret his inaction and refusal to administer the laws of the land in a fair and equitable manner in the Caledonia dispute. He has actually been quoted in his approach to leave the natives alone in their illegal occupation is to “keep the peace”, yet to arrest the non-natives is to “keep the peace. Talk about sucking and blowing at the same time!!

Let’s see now. Over a period of 1 year, one group (Native Indians) has maliciously dug up and blockaded a highway, threatened and abused numerous citizens, unlawfully occupied disputed lands (while denying others entry to the same land), exercised vandalism and violence, destroyed public property and infrastructure, tossed a truck of a bridge and illegally set fires (only to mention a few instances). All of this highly illegal activity has been met with little or no criminal charges. Ultimately, this group’s actions have been ratified and thereby deemed acceptable by the inaction of the authorities.

On the other hand, a member of another group (Non-Native White) is arrested and forcibly confined in a jailhouse overnight, (without official charge) for the erection of our national symbol of democracy and freedom – The Maple Leaf. You know, the thing that many of our ancestors died for and many of our service people are currently fighting for. There are repeated threats issued by the OPP commissioner as well as the OPPA (read union) guaranteeing “legal action” if any officers are injured during a protest or dispute.

I, as well as countless other Canadian Citizens need to know: Is the Government of the day dictating to the OPP to NOT enforce the law and existing court order, or is the OPP unilaterally opting to disobey the laws of the land on its own volition?

Either way, I can’t imagine my father, after 5 years in the Battle of the Atlantic on a destroyer, (W.W.II) would condone this type of suppression of speech and selective police state. Actually, I thought this is what he fought against, and, so did he I’m sure!!!

Spend less time on Cam Woolley, less money on Cruiser Colours and more time and money on the real issues at hand.

www.caledoniawakeupcall.com

Alcohol Fuels Bravado

O.P.P. NEWS RELEASE

Elliot Lake, Ont.

On January 19th, 2007 at approximately 9:54 p.m., while on general patrol an officer was stopped on the shoulder of the road on Highway 108 in Elliot Lake when he noticed a truck pull up in front of the stopped cruiser. The officer attended the truck to ascertain if the driver required assistance. While speaking with the driver the officer noted the smell of an alcoholic beverage.

After several tries by police, to obtain a breath sample into a roadside-screening device from the suspect, the East Algoma OPP charged Kevin BEHNKE (30) of Elliot Lake with Failure to Provide a Breath Sample. BEHNKE is scheduled to appear in court on March 6th, 2007.

O.P.P Sergeant Being Reined In


Toronto Star

[Sgt.] Cam Woolley may be taking his final bow as the voice of the (O.P.P.) Ontario Provincial Police, but curtains are still rising on his other roles. The provincial police sergeant, best known for telling news reporters wild traffic tales, moonlights as a film and TV extra – playing a paramedic and police officer on shows like DeGrassi High.

The 49-year-old isn’t retiring, but his role as quasi-official narrator the weirdest and nastiest highway action has been cut by OPP Commissioner Julian Fantino. On Thursday, Fantino called for a more sober approach to highway policing in an open letter to Ontarians, effectively sidelining Woolley.

Nothing personal, the commissioner says. And the affable Woolley says he isn’t taking it personally. “I don’t think (Fantino) is pushing me out of the way. I am still the media co-ordinator for the highway safety division … for the Toronto area,” he told the Star.

[I believe Sgt. Woolley publicly expressed his opinions on who would make the best police commissioner prior to Fantino’s appointment ....and it wasn't Fantino. So...it doesn't appear there's much, ahhh 'hope' for further promotions for Sgt. Woolley....backing the 'wrong horse' may see to that. - Editor]

The easygoing Woolley tends to take things in stride, like the film gig, which fell into his lap about 15 years ago. In his first role, the 29-year OPP veteran played himself in the final episode of DeGrassi High. He got the gig after pulling over a suspicious vehicle that had been fixed up to look like a police car. He learned the car was on its way to a television shoot. Because the car was a fake and had a plate on it from a junked vehicle, Woolley seized it. The crew needed a cruiser, so Woolley helped out. That shoot grew into something much bigger. Woolley started renting cars to shoots.

Today, he and his business partners have more than 100 vehicles, including 15 ambulances. He also acts as a consultant to filmmakers, helping crime scenes look realistic. But his most memorable role will always be that of OPP barker-in-chief, his every tale more outrageous than the last: a man driving 160 kilometres per hour to get to the hairdresser, a 7-year-old steering a big rig, a man cooking in a crockpot and tossing a salad while driving at high speed. And, for the record, Woolley says he never made light of serious offences. “I never made any jokes about drinking and driving and only used humour when appropriate.

ALSO READ:

O.P.P Commissioner Needs To Explain Himself

“Just Go With The Policy”

Caledonia’s Cost Now Over $200 MILLION

Natives Occupy Caledonia, Ontario

Arrested For Waving Flag

Post Navigation

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 57 other followers

%d bloggers like this: