ELLIOT LAKE News

Political INcorrect Constructs Arranged To Awaken Slumbering Minds…

Archive for the month “October, 2009”

CNN’s Lou Dobbs Attacked At Home

Brenda Walker

You might think that the Main Stream Media (MSM) might show some concern at an apparent assassination attempt against one of their own. 

But, as of this writing, only Fox and a couple local outlets (NBC New York and the Star Ledger) have reported on a shooting at the home of influential CNN anchor Lou Dobbs, who has been a consistent voice for law and borders for several years.

 A gunshot was fired at the New Jersey home of CNN’s Lou Dobbs after a series of threatening phone calls earlier this month, the host told listeners on his nationally syndicated radio show.

“Dobbs, a fervent proponent of U.S. border enforcement, told listeners of ‘The Lou Dobbs Show’ on Monday that the incident is part of an ongoing assault against anyone who opposes amnesty or leniency toward illegal immigrants.

“’They’ve created an atmosphere and they’ve been unrelenting in their propaganda,’ Dobbs said in reference to pro-immigration groups like the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), the National Council of La Raza and America’s Voice. ‘Three weeks ago this morning, a shot was fired at my house where I live. My wife was standing out and that followed weeks and weeks of threatening phone calls.’ [Police Probe Shot Fired at Home of CNN's Lou Dobbs, Fox News, October 29, 2009. VDARE.com inks added.]

You can hear Dobbs’ radio remarks on the incident here: Shot Fired Into Home of Lou Dobbs of CNN! [YouTube]

Imagine the MSM hysteria if CBS’ Katie Couric had been targeted!

And it’s not as if there’s no precedent here. After a similar campaign of vilification, Dutch immigration patriot leader Pim Fortuyn was actually assassinated by a man who turned out to be a leftist immigration enthusiast—although that little detail took a long time to leak out.  …continue reading HERE

ALSO READ:

Lou Dobbs Departs CNN

Multiculturalism Is A Fraud

Births and immigration in Canada from 1850 to 2000

Dan Murray

Let me tell you about a friend of mine.

For the sake of privacy, I’ll call her “Mary”.

She is a recent immigrant from the Philippines. There, she was a librarian. A few years ago, she decided she needed a change in her life. After talking with friends who were emigrating to Canada, she decided to pay a visit to Canadian immigration officials to inquire about moving here.

“You’re just the kind of person Canada needs–skilled, well-educated,” she was told. “There are lots of jobs for you.” Mary was elated. Within a few months, she had resigned from her job and was on a plane to Vancouver. She found a place to live, and soon made lots of friends in the Filipino groups that she met. Next, she began her search for the job that she had been told would be so easy to find.

This is where Mary’s story turns sour.

She did manage to find one short-term contract librarian position, but when that ended, she found herself looking all over again. In the last two years, she’s managed to find a few things very unrelated to her field, but she’s come to realize that the message she was given by Canadian immigration officials was very unrealistic and, to put it more accurately — fraudulent!

Recently, she’s been re-training so that she can make herself more qualified for non-librarian employment. I happened to be enrolled in one of the UBC (University of British Columbia) courses she was taking. One day, I gave her a ride to class and we started talking about our instructor, a University of Toronto professor who had grown up in (the eastern Canadian Province of) New Brunswick. In talking to us one day, he mentioned that his background was Irish.

As we were driving, she commented on what the instructor had mentioned one day. “He said he was Irish,” Mary declared. When Mary said this, she really meant, “He’s like me. He’s an immigrant. Canada is a country of immigrants.”

She had heard the latter statement many times and, like many new Canadians… had come to believe what she had heard.

When I told her that the instructor really meant that he came from Irish ancestry and that his ancestors, like those of many Canadians, had probably come to New Brunswick almost 200 years ago, and that a separate culture had developed in Canada in those intervening years, I could tell from the look on her face that she was shocked and deflated.

Not only had she believed the immigration official, but she had believed the messages fanned by Canada’s multiculturalists that implied that Canada was like a blank slate – that it didn’t really have a history — that there really was no resident Canadian culture and that Canada was composed of many different ethnic groups (Not Racial) all just “recently arrived”—and that as a new arrival, she would fit in well, and would be no different from the country-ful of other “recent arrivals” (immigrants).

I felt and continue to feel sympathy for “Mary”. Like tens of thousands of other immigrants who have arrived in Canada in the last 15 years, she is a victim of the short-term electoral aspirations of a number of people in the Liberal Party of Canada who feel they can use the immigrant vote to win a significant number of seats.

But I feel more sympathy for Canadian job-seeking victims of Liberal immigration policies because Canadians are enduring and will continue to endure undetermined long-term employment losses precisely because of these policies.

What is the connection between “Mary’s” story and multiculturalism?

As one observer of this subject has said, immigration is the oxygen that feeds the fires of multiculturalism. Without one another, the two would wither—an event that many Canadians would like to see occur soon. But at the moment, the two are in full flame. What have they achieved?

Well, all of us will concede that some spice has been added to Canada. But what has been the price? Mary’s case outlines the deceit that has been practiced on skilled immigrants. But it also reveals the insult given to Canadians. The multiculturalists have rushed to the aid of people like Mary with affirmative action programs, trying to get public and private employers to hire immigrants because these immigrants make up a significant percentage of our population now.

All Canadians have heard the following illogical statement from a number of public employers: “Well, we want to have our workforce reflect the ethnic composition of our community.”

What this statement really means is that these employers want to move recent arrivals to the FRONT of the employment line!

Meanwhile, resident Canadians are supposed to go meekly to the back of this line!? What Canadians in their right minds would ever want this?

This brings us to the real issue. Most Canadians assume that their government should be serving its own people. It is very clear that Canada’s immigration policies are in conflict with the employment aspirations of its own citizens.

So, the first definition of multiculturalism I would give is this: it is a flowery-sounding deceit of both the people who have come here and of the people of Canada.

second definition follows from the first.

Multiculturalism is a euphemism for an attempt to intimidate the people of Canada into accepting people that it never really neededIt is NON-Canadian-culturalism. It is an attempt to put itself above all other considerations, especially the informed interests of CANADIANS.

[Multiculturalism is really MULTI-RACIALISM]

Not only does it thwart the job-seeking of Canadians, it crowds and degrades the living space of Canadians – who live in the three major immigrant-receiving areas of Canada: Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver.

At a time when most Canadians are aware that the most basic science asserts that global population has to be stabilized and reduced, these three areas of Canada are growing at third-world rates. At a time when the effects of overuse of resources are appearing in the form of climate change here and all over the world, Canada is bringing in unprecedented numbers of people to consume more and more resources.

The government of Canada has never produced any rational evidence to justify its present immigration policies. What should Canada place first: irrational, ill-informed multiculturalist-immigration policies — or its precious living spaces?

The multiculturalists have had considerable success in bullying Canadians into accepting the idea that multiculturalism should take precedence over the livability of living space. To any sane, informed Canadian — this does not make sense!

In addition to deceit and intimidation, multiculturalism is resurrected colonialism. The two main source areas of immigrants to Canada are China and India (+ Pakistan).

The populations of these countries make up well over a third of the world’s 7 billion people. Since the introduction of unprecedented 250,000+ annual immigration levels in the early 1990’s, these two groups have quickly become the majority, for example, in areas of the Lower Mainland of British Columbia.

There is virtually an unlimited number of people in these two countries to continue the flood. Prominent members of these groups have declared that they will do everything they can to make sure that the flood continues.

The multiculturalists defend what is happening by using the guilt card: they tell Canadians that we colonized Canada and displaced the aboriginal population, so what is wrong with two large ethnic groups doing the same to us? In other words, they tell Canadians that in order to make up for past guilt, Canadians must meekly accept this resurrected colonialism. Other groups have done the same thing here and in other parts of Canada.

The multiculturalists’ attitude, which implies that Canada is some partially filled, acultural space waiting to be filled with infinite numbers of foreign people, who will make infinite demands for equal ethnic treatment, has to be put into the nearest landfill where it belongs. The most direct way to achieve that goal is to return Canada’s immigration policy to the principle of economic and cultural absorptive capacity.

In other words, when Canada has an economic need for immigrants, it will look for them. When it needs very few–as is certainly the case now–it will not look for them.

As for cultural absorptive capacity, the Canadian government should never permit the inflow of immigrants to overwhelm the culture of resident Canadians. In summary, Canada will continue to admit some immigrants…but those numbers must be reduced dramatically.

In this way, common sense will be restored to Canada’s immigration policies, the frustrations of immigrants like “Mary” will be reduced dramatically, the ambitions of Canadian job-seekers will be a primary goal of Canada’s government, Canadian culture will regain its self-respect and the people of Canada will re-assert their sovereignty over their OWN country. >>SOURCE

CHINA 1,319,000,000 (Billion) People

INDIA –  1,136,000,000 (Billion)    “

CANADA – 33,000,000  (million)   “

[What’s the percentage (%) of WHITE people on Earth? Answer.]

ALSO READ:

Diversity Is A Fraud

Is Burlington Too White?

Racial Diversity – A CON Game

*********************************

“Diversity” Police Standards

Multiculturalism – A Dividing Force

TORONTO – A “Multicultural Paradise”

******************************************

Canadian City Ahbors “White Privilege”

WHITE People – An Endangered Species

*******************************************
Hire Canadians First!

Labour Shortage MYTH

Importing Chinese Miners?

*****************************

CANADIAN Border Madness

Immigration Reduces Income

Publisher’s Memo On Immigration

**************************************

New Chinese Political Party In Canada

Canadian & American Differences

Tim Murray

TOO many people in the Commonwealth — and outside of it, as well — fail to differentiate between Canadians and Americans. Canadians find that very insulting. I know I do.

It must be conceded though that, from afar, the Canadian English dialect is not unalike many American dialects to the untrained ear, and to those not intimately acquainted with North American life our conduct and appearance would indeed seem indistinguishable from Americans. Sure, Americans drink watered-down beer, play boring 4-down football, don’t live for ice hockey, say “huh” instead of “eh” and don’t know what an adverb is. But other than that, we blend in. Especially when a Canadian becomes a movie star or a comedian. Then to Americans, he always was an American. Nevertheless, I would assert that there is a distinctive Canadian personality, and it can be evidenced by our respective attitudes to freedom and national pride. Attitudes that can be illustrated by contrasting the following statements:

American: “Give me liberty or give me death.” (Patrick Henry)
Canadian: “Give me an entitlement or I will vote you out of office.”

American: (Quoting Voltaire) “I do not agree with what you have to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”
Canadian: “I don’t agree with what you have to say so take me off your email list.”

American: “It’s a First Amendment issue”.
Canadian: “It’s a Human Rights issue.”

American: “I want to be free.”
Canadian: “I want to be safe.”

American: “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.”
Canadian: “Peace, Order and Good Government.”

American: “God helps those who help themselves.”
Canadian: “I need government funding for this.”

CNN (American): “We welcome your views,”
CBC (Canadian): “We welcome your views but we will make damn sure no one else will hear them.”

…Continue reading HERE.

“Oath Keepers” and Middle Americans

Patrick J. Buchanan

In the brief age of Obama, we have had truthers,” “birthers,” Tea Party activists and town-hall dissenters.

Comes now, the “Oath Keepers.”

And who might they be?

Writes Alan Maimon in the Las Vegas Review-Journal, Oath Keepers, depending on where one stands, are “either strident defenders of liberty or dangerous peddlers of paranoia.”[ READY TO REVOLT: Oath Keepers pledges to prevent dictatorship in United States, October 18, 2009]

Formed in March (2009) they are EX-MILITARY and POLICE who repledge themselves to defend the Constitution, even if it means disobeying orders. If the U.S. government ordered law enforcement agencies to violate Second Amendment rights by disarming the people, Oath Keepers will NOT obey.

“The whole point of Oath Keepers is to stop a dictatorship from ever happening here,” says founding father Stewart Rhodes, an ex-Army paratrooper and Yale-trained lawyer. “My focus is on the guys with the guns, because they can’t do it without them.

[...]

In their lifetimes, they (white working-class voters) have seen their Christian faith purged from schools their taxes paid for, and mocked in movies and on TV.  They have seen their factories shuttered in the thousands and their jobs outsourced in the millions to Mexico and China. They have seen trillions of tax dollars go for Great Society programs, but have seen no Great Society… only rising crime, illegitimacy, drug use and dropout rates.

They watch on cable TV as illegal aliens walk into their country, are rewarded with free educations and health care, and take jobs at lower pay than American families can live on—then carry Mexican flags in American cities and demand U.S. citizenship.

 They see Wall Street banks bailed out as they sweat their next paycheck, then read that bank profits are soaring, and the big bonuses for the brilliant bankers are back. Neither they nor their kids ever benefited from affirmative action, unlike Barack and Michelle Obama.

They see a government in Washington that cannot balance its books, win our wars or protect our borders. The government shovels out trillions to Fortune 500 corporations and banks to rescue the country from a crisis created by the government and Fortune 500 corporations and banks.

America was ONCE their country. They sense they are losing it. And they are right.

(Full article HERE)

ALSO READ:

100, 000, 000 NON-Whites In USA

US White People – An Endangered Species

Mass Immigration Numbers (Short Video)

Multiculturalism – A Dividing Force

Racial Diversity – A CON Game

“Whitopia”

[...]

WHITE people want to live around other white people, although most will never, EVER admit this factwhich Black people exploit so easily and effectively.

A movie was made called Pleasantville, which pokes fun at Pre-Obama America, for its lack of “color”. White people are constantly trying re-create the magic that is dramatically castigated in that film … to no avail.

Black people want to live among White people — because — ONLY White people have been able to create and sustain a pleasant-ville that welcomes them with open arms and away from the crime and poverty that shapes most majority Black areas.

So, paradoxically, we must include Whitopia among the Stuff Black People Don’t Like, for they would love to live among the thoughtful and pleasant White people who flee to these enclaves that are popping up quickly and efficiently (like a SIM-City), yet they are fearful for actually admitting what this would mean in practical terms.

Simply put, Whitopia‘s mere existence undermines all that has been done in social engineering over the past 50 years, and proves without a shadow of a doubt, that integration has failed and that wherever White people can be found living amongst almost all other White people … Black people will be found with their bags packed, hoping to move in soon to start acting White.

Yet, if Black people flock to Whitopia‘s, it will mean Black people are incapable of governing and keeping their own communities in check, and that there is no THE MAN keeping Black people, but merely Black people performing that feat. Catch-22 indeed … for a Pleasant-ville really can only include White people after all, sans color.

[See: http://kalispellple.blogspot.ca/]

If Black people do flock to a Whitopia … White people will just pick up and leave again, thereby exacerbating the problem in an endless hamster wheel of disharmony. [Full article HERE]

ALSO READ:

White Identity

A White Racial Crisis

White People Are Hypocrites

*******************************

More Fall-Out on Black IQ

*******************************

Slanted// MSM News Coverage

Black People Love Us! (social satire)

Psychology and White Ethnocentrism

****************************************

Media Bias On Race Reporting

Race, Crime & Media

C.B.C. Faces A Reality Check

 

CBC Radio Book Club | Douglas Coupland

CBC Radio Book Club | Douglas Coupland 1970s?

Tim Murray

[...]

Well, I am from the “Friends of Canadian Broadcasting”, [and] we are an organization to defend the CBC…  Are you interested in helping to save the CBC ?

“NO!”, I began in a loud voice, “I spend my waking hours thinking of ways to DESTROY the CBC. It is a politically-correct mouthpiece of favoured identity groups with whom they make corrupt arrangements…..”

She remained in shock while I ranted on a spiel that must have lasted 5 minutes before she could break in with a question. I told her about the CBC, the BBC and the ABC, and while talking, I called up the dozen rants against Mother Corp. on my personal computer.

She became interested to know, as an individual, the titles of each so she could google them. I told her to read Jack Parson’s Treason of the BBC to learn about a case study, in biased and myopic journalism, which seems to be the template for us, too.

At the end, when things calmed down, she said, “ Well, I must go, but how should I summarize your comments“. I replied thusly. “Proportional representation is the buzz-phrase of politics. And in commerce, companies are told to hire a workforce that reflects the diversity of the public they serve.”

If our Police forces and Fire departments must represent diversity, then surely the C.B.C. should do as well.

But not ethnic or cultural diversity so much, but the diversity of opinions that exist in Canada. The FULL spectrum of opinions. And spokesmen for causes deemed politically incorrect by CBC producers should not be invited to forums just to be ambushed, and outnumbered four to one by the other side.

I had told her about several examples of this. And that if she read “Conspiracy of Silence at the BBC, the ABC and the CBC” she would realize that it was not just a Canadian phenomena, but a formula and pattern of state broadcasting in all Anglophone countries.

In other words, the problem is endemic to state broadcasting which is captive of powerful lobbies nurtured or promoted by the government. We need public broadcasting, not state broadcasting. And not journalists and producers who are recruited from the graduates of the mind-bending schools of PC journalism.

If the CBC cannot be reformed, it should be scrapped. Rather be uninformed than misinformed. Better to leave people to their own brains (minds) rather than have them downloaded from CBC “Pravda” in Toronto.  …more HERE.

[...]

ALSO READ:

C.B.C. & The Immigration Question

Publisher’s Memo On Immigration

Media Bias On Race Reporting

*****************************

Race, Crime & Media

“News” Vs Propaganda

Mass Mind Control Through MSM

***********************************

Turn Your Television OFF

Taboo News: Mass Immigration

Mass Media: Smoke & Mirrors

Slanted// MSM News Coverage

Mass Immigration’s Negative Effects

national Flag of Canada

Recent mass immigration has NEGATIVELY AFFECTED Canadian living standards and is challenging OUR existing national identity, culture, and social fabric… concludes a new book released today by the Fraser Institute, Canada’s leading economic think tank.

Based on a series of papers presented to a 2008 Montreal conference on immigration, The Effects of Mass Immigration on Canadian Living Standards and Society recommends significant changes to Canadian immigration policy including changes to the selection process that would limit the number of immigrants.

Since 1990, Canada’s annual rate of immigration has been the highest in the world, resulting in a population increase of 3.9 million people between 1990 and 2006.

[Today in 2013 ... that estimate is now well over 6,000,000 new immigrants -- of which a whopping 87% originate from NON-white, 3rd-World countries -- a consistent trend seen for the past 23 years. See: Canada's Black Population]

This mass immigration has had profound effects on Canada’s economic, demographic, social, and political conditions, affecting the well-being of all Canadians including past immigrants,” said Herbert Grubel, Fraser Institute senior fellow and co-editor of the book.

[Proportion of Visible Minorities for ALL of CANADA, 1981-2001--Stats Canada]

[WHITE Canadians are rapidly DECLINING in population numbers in direct proportion to the ever INCREASING influx of NON-white immigrants.  By adding another blue bar in the above graph to represent the census year of 2011, we find racial minorities now represent 19.1% of Canada's 35,000,000 people. White Canadians have plummeted to about 78% of our population. That is a HUGE drop in proportional representation in our OWN European-based nation ... and only since 1981 !!

But it gets worse. Within the next 2 decades, White Canadians are expected to spiral downwards to about 67% of our population because of the needless importation of 3rd-world immigrants into a 1st world nation. Obviously, this un-welcomed trend does not bode well for the next generation of White Canadians, but this is the unhappy legacy we're leaving our children and grandchildren.  >ELN Editor]

“Unfortunately, most Canadians are insufficiently aware of these effects partly because a code of “political correctness” tends to identify any examination of immigration policies with “racism“, and partly because Canada’s electoral system rewards politicians who are in favour of the current high immigrant intake.”  …Source

*********************************************************************************************************

ALSO READ:



More Refugees To Support

Canadian Border Madness

Is Burlington TOO White?

**********************************

Multiculturalism Is A Fraud

Racial Diversity – A CON Game

Canada Is Too Accommodating

Canadian Generosity Vs Stupidity

****************************************

Canadians Want Illegals Deported

Canada Open To Immigrant Abuse

Multiculturalism – A Dividing Force

Foreign Seniors Displacing Canadians

Score Card: Immigrants 1, Canadians 0

**********************************************

No Punjabi? No Job For Canadian Nurse!

White Woman Faces Job Discrimination

*******************************************

Fed-Up Canadians

Land Of Trusting Fools

***************************

…also

Canada’s Foreign-born 20%

100,000,000 NON-Whites In U.S.

Frank Talk On Immigration (2003)

********************************************

US White People – An Endangered Species

US Mass Immigration Numbers (Short Video)

SWEDEN’S Non-White Immigrant Problems

Cavatus’s Blog (Sweden)

*********************************************************************************


Sweden Tops In Rapes

English: Flags of the Nordic countries - from ...

White Nordic countries – from left: Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden and Denmark

Fjordman

SWEDEN has the highest incidence of reported rapes in Europe — twice as many as “runner up” the UK, a new study shows.

Researchers behind the EU study, which will be presented on Tuesday, conclude that rape appears to be a more common occurrence in Sweden than in continental European countries.

In Sweden, 46 incidents of rape are reported per 100,000 residents. This figure is double as many as in the UK which reports 23 cases, and four times that of the other Nordic countries, Germany and France. The figure is up to 20 times (20X) the figure for certain countries in southern and eastern Europe.

[...]

A report from the organization Save the Children told that Swedish girls are scared of being raped, a possibility that appears very real to them. A survey carried out among ninth-grade boys in the IMMIGRANT-DOMINATED suburb of Rinkeby (Sweden) showed that in the last year, 17% of the boys had forced someone to have sex, 31% had hurt someone so badly that the victim required medical care, and 24% had committed burglary or broken into a car. Sensational statistics, but they appear to have been published only in a daily newssheet that is distributed free on the subways.

SWEDISH RAPE VICTIM

“It is not as wrong raping a Swedish girl as raping an Arab girl,” says Hamid, in an interview about a gang rape involving a Swedish girl and immigrant perps. “The Swedish girl gets a lot of help afterwards, and she had probably f**ked before, anyway. But the Arab girl will get problems with her family. For her, being raped is a source of shame. It is important that she (Arab girl) retains her virginity… It is far too easy to get a Swedish whore… girl, I mean;” says Hamid, and laughs over his own choice of words. “I don’t have too much respect for Swedish girls. I guess you can say they get f**ked to pieces.”

[Has Sweden Gone INSANE?]

[Can Sweden Survive Multi-racialism?]

[UPDATE for 2013]

In an article from June 2007 with the title “Summertime — rape time,” Aftonbladet, one of the largest dailies in Scandinavia, linked the spike in rapes during the summer to the warm weather. The official number of rape charges in Sweden has more than quadrupled during one generation, even more for girls under the age of 15. If this is due to the warm weather, I suppose the Scandinavian rape wave is caused by global warming? The fact that a greatly disproportionate number of the suspects have an immigrant background according to statistics from neighboring Norway and Denmark is purely coincidental, no doubt.  Read MORE….

[...]


Gang Raping Muslims in AUSTRALIA, too!

ALSO READ:

Useful Idiots

Muslims In Stockholm

Raped in Oslo, Norway

**************************

Racial Diversity – A CON Game

Multiculturalism – A Dividing Force

**************************************

Can Sweden Survive Multi-Racialism

Sweden’s Ordered Society In Trouble

Swedish Media Soft On Immigrants

…and, a ‘good news’ European video

…and check out Sweden’s http://cavatus.wordpress.com/

Subscribe (FREE) to a blog search feed for link:http://elliotlakenews.wordpress.com/ in Google Reader



Systemic Child Rape – Afghanistan

[...]

Witnessing two men, one armed with a knife, sodomize the child during an incident in late 2006 helped drive the 26-year-old [former soldier, Travis Schouten] to the brink of mental collapse.

But the former corporal said the assault is just the tip of an iceberg and underneath lies the systemic sexual abuse of boys at the hands of Afghanistan’s POLICE and ARMY. It’s something he said the Canadian Forces has turned a blind eye to.

“It’s disgusting,” said Schouten, now retired after eight years in the military. “We’re telling people that we’re trying to build a nation there and we let this happen?”

“We allow rampant abuse of young boys at the hands of what is supposed to be their finest police officers and army officers, then what does that say?”

Schouten’s allegations that Afghans were sexually abusing children at a Canadian base near Kandahar made headlines in 2008 but earlier this year, military investigators dismissed the claims as unfounded.

He is, however, not alone in voicing his concerns. Defence Department records show military police were upset about such incidents but were told not to interfere. Army officers also met in 2007 to discuss the issue of Afghan security personnel “having anal sex with young boys” but their main concern was the media would somehow find out.

Others in the military note they were told such practices were an age-old part of Afghan culture. One soldier who e-mailed Canwest News Service stated he served at the same base at another time and troops had orders to stop any rapes. But he also noted they were told the practise of “Man Love Thursdays,” as it was called, involved consenting Afghans and no one was raped by older men. The children involved were given small gifts or money in return for sex, soldiers said.

Schouten, however, questions whether a five- or six-year old child, or even an 11-year-old, can consent. “The Canadian Forces wants people to think it’s a cultural thing, that everyone is doing it, because it takes the onus of responsibility off them to stop it,” he said.

The United Nations has also questioned arguments that sex with children is a cultural issue. In July 2008, a UN special representative spoke out against the Afghan practise. “What I found was nobody talks about it; everyone says, ‘Well, you know, it’s been there for 1,000 years, so why do we want to raise this now?’ ” said Radhika Coomaraswamy. “But somebody has to raise it and it has to be dealt with.”

And not all Afghans are so accepting of what some claim is tradition. Afghan villagers this summer complained to British troops in Helmand province that Afghan police were abducting children to be used for sex.  -Continue HERE

[...]

DAVID PUGLIESE, OTTAWA CITIZEN

ALSO READ:

German Gov’t Promotes Incest

Land Of Trusting Fools

Paxcanadiana

“When I first read about the Canadian government denying the re-entry of Suaad Hagi Mohamud, a Canadian citizen of Somali birth, I cringed. I knew the political left would jump all over it to castigate the current conservative minority government as racist. Also to race-bait the “red neck inbreds” and harangue them just to satisfy their sense of moral superiority. It would be more fodder to scare the government from making much needed reforms to the immigration system and to silence immigration critics.

However it looks like they leaped without looking because Ms. Mohamud has some explaining to do. According to new information first reported by the CBC Ms. Mohamud, when questioned, gave contradictory evidence. The Toronto Star reports on it here. According to the Star, migrant integrity officer Paul Jamieson says in an affidavit that he suspected the woman claiming to be Ms. Mohamud was really her sister.

[...]

Paul Jamieson interviewed the woman three times over a five day period while she was in Kenyan custody. According to Jamieson the woman claiming to be Ms. Mohamud said she was a student at Humber College and named Randy Jackson [of American Idol fame and a Black man] as one of her “professors”, but he found no such professor listed on the college website.

She also could not name the Canadian prime minister or Toronto’s mayor and could not name teachers at her 12-year-old son’s Toronto school. Also, according to Jamieson, a sample signature differed from the passport and immigration application signatures and the first name she variously spelled Suaad and Suad. She also could not tell what ATS, the courier company that employed her, stood for.

[...]

From what we now know let me reconstruct the “crime scene” so to speak. The real Suaad Hagi Mohamud went to Kenya and indeed visited her mother and her husband. She also met her siblings with one of whom she planned to sneak into Canada. This is the one who appeared at the airport and got caught.

She was detained for five days by Kenyan officials and interviewed by Canadian officials. They concluded she was an imposter. With passport confiscated she was released to linger in Kenya for three months. The Toronto Star picked up the story and ran with it, eventually relinquishing control of it to ideology, agenda, and editorial bias, pointing an accusing finger at the big, bad, racist conservative government. Political pressure mounted to get a DNA test from the woman and to bring her back to Canada. This is when the real Suaad Hagi Mohamud appeared. Recall that she was in Kenya for three months. She wasn’t in custody all that time. That’s why the DNA test was 99.9% in the affirmative.

Seeing an easy and lucrative paycheck an opportunistic lawyer contacted her and took up her case. They filed a $2.6 million lawsuit against the government. However, I suspect, her lawyer was as ignorant of the finer details of her story as was everyone else, going by what he read in the Toronto Star. Now he is in the unanticipated role of playing spin doctor.

[...]

Assuming that Suaad Hagi Mohamud tried to smuggle an imposter into Canada by lending her passport, how common is this practice? Who else is doing it? How do they get their passports back? From what I can extrapolate from Mr. Jamieson’s comments this behaviour may be more common than we know. What does it say about these immigrants who have taken a citizenship oath? What does this tell us about how they view Canada?    Are we truly the land of trusting fools?” More…HERE

ALSO READ:

More Refugees To Support

Canadian Generosity Vs Stupidity

Foreign Seniors Displacing Canadians

600,000 “Refugees” Since 1987  (CANADA)

Canada – “Refugees” Paradise

Fed-Up Canadians

Post Navigation

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 102 other followers

%d bloggers like this: