Political-Correctness Gone Wild

No political correctness

Take Back Your Power - Say NO !

Sarah, Maid of Albion

It’s almost guaranteed that any statement or belief which is deemed politically correct is, by the same token…. factually INcorrect.

Examples are found in almost every aspect of our society, and how we are required to perceive and describe them. It is, for instance, politically correct, and all but mandatory for anyone within the media, law or politics to insist there is no difference in the rate of street-level criminal offending between the races.

As in any totalitarian society, it then becomes the role of the state controlled popular media to promote the approved doctrine in the propaganda beamed into the homes of the population by misreported news or fictional drama bearing no resemblance to reality — with the effect that, over time, the LIE becomes a universally accepted truth.

Indeed, in their eagerness to obey orders, the media go even further. If one were to judge by the story lines and portrayals in all popular TV and celluloid drama, the vast majority of all street crime, be it mugging, robbery, assault, rape or drug dealing is perpetrated by whites, whereas NON-whites more commonly appear as victims or employed in law enforcement.

Progressively as people lock themselves away from the frightening reality outside, the pretend-world coming through their TV screens becomes confused with the far less appealing one outside, until it becomes [their] new reality.

This applies even more invidiously to the constant propaganda aimed at the most vulnerable and receptive amongst us — our children. The makers of the new US TV children’s adventure cartoonDora the Explorer” brag that their Latina heroine and politically correct plots may “Change a generation“. They will, of course, be changing that generation by making it believe in LIES, and what else is that but propaganda?.

This form of reverse reality extends far beyond popular entertainment the tentacles of political-correctness have wound themselves throughout all levels of society, especially into government, the media and of course all government-funded institutions, which now suffer from what might be termed institutional political correctness.

On the face of it, this may not appear too malevolent and there is a temptation to treat the zealots of political correctness with the benign amused tolerance one might grant to an eccentric maiden aunt. That is, until one realises that they are functioning on the basis of what are, in effect a series of untruths and blatant lies and that they are imposing those lies on almost every aspect of our lives.

Gradually these lies have come to dictate official policy within so many areas which directly impact upon our current well being and the very future of our nation.

The police for instance are the organisation tasked with protecting society from criminality, yet they are not permitted to acknowledge, or in many instances even address the truth of the criminality they are confronting. Instead they are required to operate as if within a parallel universe or pantomime, playing lip service to an entirely false reality.

Who can forget when following widespread public concerns about knife attacks on London teenagers, perpetrated exclusively by NON-white youths, the London Metropolitan police produced a deliberately misleading public information film featuring a white boy carrying a knife.

The false reality is even more prevalent within so-called “victim support” organisations, who appear to view their role as guardians of the politically correct flame as more important than the safety of those they are supposed to support.

This is not just happening in Europe.

In America, in the aftermath of the Duke Lacrosse case (the ultimate would-be politically correct fairy tale), I recall reading commentary on a rape crisis website based in North Carolina, which made the claim that inter-racial rape was relatively rare, but when it did occur it was predominantly perpetrated by white attackers against non-white victims. I can’t link to that web-page as it has since disappeared, presumably someone involved discovered a sense of shame and took it down. However, such blatant lies are commonly made by organisations who claim that their role is to protect the victims of violence.

Clearly, those running such organisations believe it is more important to protect a politically correct fantasy than it is to actually protect women from being raped.

As with the TV shows and newspaper articles full of fictional white racists, muggers and rapists and pretend non-white victims, it is, also politically correct not to notice that what is being said or what is being portrayed is factually incorrect and indeed the EXACT REVERSE of the reality all around us.

Not noticing inconvenient facts is another fundamental requirement of political correctness. (For emphasis, capitalized and italic words by ELN editor) >Continue reading….(below the photo)

ALSO READ:

Explaining Political Correctness

How Britain Destroyed Itself

Political Correctness Run Amock

Jane Gardener Speaks Her Mind

“Little Guy” Battles Political-Correctness

Australia Says “NO” To Tamils

Location of Sri Lanka.

Where on earth is Sri Lanka?? (formerly Ceylon)



Ezra Levant

Here’s a warning for bogus Tamil “refugees” made by the Australian Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, just before she called an election last month:

“Do not pay a people smuggler, do not risk your life, only to arrive in Australian waters and find that you are far, far more likely than anything else to be quickly sent home by plane.”

Gillard does more than just talk tough to Tamil gatecrashers.

Australia is now in negotiations with East Timor, New Zealand and the United Nations about setting up a “regional processing centre” where intercepted ships will be taken.

Arriving by boat would just be a ticket back to the regional processing centre,” warned Gillard.

Right now, refugee applicants are processed on a remote Australian island called Christmas Island, where they’re held until their cases are heard.

Gillard wants to go one better — outsource the job to other countries. Why not?

Her plan is pretty simple. If someone’s refugee claim was rejected, they’d be sent home. And if a refugee claim were found legitimate, that refugee would be resettled — but in a safe third country, NOT necessarily in Australia.

There are plenty of friendly countries in (THEIR OWN) neighbourhood where Tamils don’t have to worry about being “picked on”… as they “claim” they are in Sri Lanka.

Australia would pay those countries to resettle Tamils — a lot cheaper than giving them five-star treatment in Australia. They’ll take some, sure. But they’ll choose which ones.

Australia is serious about stopping bogus immigrants. Which makes sense for a big island just a short boat trip from China, India and Indonesia.

Warning videos

Australia has produced videos in languages such as Tamil and Arabic, warning fake refugees from around the world not to risk their lives — and waste their money — paying criminals to smuggle them ashore.

Oh, by the way: (Prime Minister) Gillard is with the Labour Party — they’re the “soft-on-immigration party”.

Other than immigration lawyers, WHO could complain about Australia’s approach? Surely not true refugees. They will be resettled somewhere they won’t be hurt — just not necessarily in Australia.

And that’s what these Tamils claim they want — just to get away from Sri Lanka. Beggars can’t be choosers.

[ http://austnewnation.org/]

Bogus refugees — that is the LIARSwill be sent back to where they came from. News reports from British Columbia put the cost, so far, of handling Canada’s 492 Tamil gate-crashers at $22 million — covering everything from FREE telephone calls back to Sri Lanka to FREE lawyers to FREE dental care.

Taxpaying, law-abiding Canadian citizens don’t even get free dental care…. in case you’d forgotten.

These Tamils have been ashore for TWO WEEKS, and they’ve already cost us $22 million. That’s $45,000 each — and that’s BEFORE they sign up for (free) welfare, (free) child benefits and all other (free) social services they’re legally entitled to… for the years it takes UNTIL they’re processed.

Who among us wouldn’t rather give a country like India or Thailand $20,000 a head to resettle genuine Tamil refugees there? And as to the fake refugees, even a $1,000 plane ticket to ship them straight home is a bargain.

Right now, they’re EACH costing us more than $1,000 a day in Canada.

The fact is, if we followed the Australian plan, once word got out that Canada wasn’t the world’s sucker anymore, there wouldn’t be that many gate-crashing boats to deal with. There would be no point in paying a smuggler to make the long journey to Canada if you knew you’d never get to set foot in Canada — you’d be taken to an offshore processing centre, and, at best, wind up in a third country.

Like Canada, … Australia is a friendly, generous country BUILT BY SETTLERS (not immigrants!). They love their neighbours and are quick to help, much like they did after the 2004 tsunami.

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_are_the_world’s_racial_demographics

BUT (Australia and Canada) know the difference between giving something and having something stolen. Even Australia’s left-wing party knows it… which tells you how bad things are.   -Source and here.   (For emphasis, capitalized words, bold print and parenthesis by ELN editor)

ALSO READ:

Porous Border Problems

More Refugees To Support

An Australian Integrity Test

600,000 “Refugees” Since 1987

Canadian Generosity Vs Stupidity

Sudanese “Refugee” Turned Rapist

Canada Welcomes  All Undesirables

Australia Panders To Foreign Invaders

Foreign SENIORS Displacing Canadians

Australia’s “Adventure” With Multi-Culti

Australia & Canada Have Limited Land Space

Chinese Man Knocking On Canada’s Backdoor

False Arguments Give For Population Growth

To Recognize Racial Differences

These are idealized normal curves comparing th...

Image via Wikipedia

William Robertson Boggs

[...]

What is the price of refusing to acknowledge racial differences?

It is as simple, and as staggering as this: America will never solve its racial problems. [Nor will Canada with its' own recently IMPORTED multi-racial problems]

The most immediate problem is that Blacks, and to a lesser extent, Hispanics, are failing in disproportionate numbers. If we are to believe that all races are equally talented and hard-working, then the failures of Blacks and Hispanics cannot be their own fault. They can only be the fault of White people.

Therefore every time a NON-white takes drugs, goes on welfare or commits a crime, it is a silent indictment of “racist” White people, past and present. It cannot be otherwise IF all races have the same natural potential.

Because our society has turned its back on the real causes of Black failure, it must devote itself to searching for and “eliminating” spurious causes.

If the theory is that Blacks fail because they do not have proper “role models”… we hire unqualified Blacks, and then put them in positions of authority.

If White society has destroyed Black self-esteem… we promote grandiose fantasies about African history.

If segregated schooling is bad for Blacks… we send them to White schools.

If we then find that Black students get the worst grades… we devalue the curriculum so everyone can get “A”s.

If standardized tests discriminate against Blacks… we do away with them.

If “racist” employers prefer not to hire Blacks… we force employers to hire them.

If a “racist” society still manages to impoverish Blacks… we give them welfare and food stamps.

When one grand project to lift up the Black man mysteriously fails, America embarks on yet another, but each successive failure is taken only to confirm the terrible truth: Whites must be even more viciously “racist” than anyone had thought possible.

Therefore, each new experiment is launched with more denunciations of White wickedness and appeals to White guilt. No opportunity is lost to invoke the memory of slavery, Jim Crow, segregation, and the lynch mob.

The effect on some Whites of these constant denunciations of “racism” is an exaggerated eagerness to submit to every Black demand.

At the least threat of violence, college presidents promise to build Blacks-only dormitories and hire more Black professors. Race riots are solemnly searched for “root causes.” Every silly version of African history and every improbable theory of “Black genocide” gets a respectful hearing.

[...]

The other direct effect on Whites,  is that they suffer the very racial discrimination that civil rights laws were supposed to prohibit. The injustices of affirmative action are visited on every new generation of White Americans that applies to college or [who] needs a job.

The burden falls on young Whites who have grown up since the abolition of legal discrimination against Blacks, and, who by no moral legerdemain (deception) can be held responsible for whatever “wrongs” may have been done to Blacks in the past. The meekness with which young Whites accept discrimination, and the diligence with which their elders mete it out to them are among the wonders of our era.

Clearly, if it were recognized that inherent limitations rather than White “racism” were the cause of Black failure, [then] young Whites would not be saddled with hereditary guilt.

Today’s orthodoxies require that [young Whites] be sacrificed to the dogma of equality, while the nation suffers from wasting thousands of university places on Blacks who will drop out, and from hiring untold numbers of Blacks for jobs for which they are not qualified.

Finally, recognition of racial differences would be a vital first step toward removing the debilitating burden of guilt that so many Whites appear to carry. Today’s Whites need feel NO collective guilt because of the status of Blacks.

Never in the history of the world, has a group of Blacks enjoyed as high a level of material prosperity, as do American blacks. It is a level they would certainly never have achieved on their own.

As research, by Linda Gottfredson at the University of Delaware suggests, affirmative action may have pushed Black Americans into even higher incomes than would have been possible on ability alone. To blame Whites for not promoting Blacks even further beyond their natural capacities is ridiculous. -To Full Article-

[...]

ALSO READ:

Black IQ Differences

“Racism” Is Not Sinful

The Right To Discriminate

Black Culture Retarding White Kids

****************************

Racial Differences Are Real

IQ And The Wealth of Nations

Is Racial Separation Immoral?

Scientific DNA Racial Profiling

********************************

Canada’s BLACK Population

Stuff BLACK People Don’t Like

Lying, Cheating “Refugees”

Province of British Columbia in Canada

British Columbia

 

PaxCanadiana

Right now, Canadian security agents and immigration officials in (the province of) British Columbia, are being entertained by well concocted tales of “persecution”, “danger”, and “war” in a far off place (Sri Lanka), where to stay is to die, to flee is to live.

They are, for the most part, stories fabricated to game Canada’s asylum system. Why wait years to come to Canada as an immigrant when a believable fable of persecution is all one needs to walk right into the country and make oneself at home.

In fact that is what some thought they were going to do. According to this CBC news report “some of the nearly 500 Tamil migrants who ‘travelled’ (??) to British Columbia inside a cramped cargo ship had no idea that once they finally set foot on Canadian soil they could be kept behind bars for weeks or even months.” They had it in their heads that “they would be able to explore the country soon after they arrived thinking “the next day they [can] go and see Canada and enjoy”. I wonder what gave them that idea?

There is much to gain by misrepresenting yourself as a refugee. Not only is a refugee allowed all the rights and privileges of a Canadian citizen via the (1985) Singh decision (except the right to vote), but also work permits, (free) welfare payments, partial health and dental coverage, and subsidized housing.

As a consequence the Tamil refugee tab will cost Canadian taxpayers millions, especially those of us in Ontario, particularly Toronto where most of the Tamil migrants will settle… if not all of them. This is what prompted mayoral candidate Rob Ford to speak out against the federal government offloading the costs of its immigration program onto Toronto. Here’s a list of (free) welfare benefits that await a refugee claimant:

* Single person with no children — $585 monthly

* Single person with one child 17 or under — $913 monthly

* Single person with two kids 17 or under — $961 monthly

* Single person with two dependent adults — $1,303 monthly

* Couple with no children — $1,010 monthly

* Couple with one kid 17 or under — $1,058 monthly

* Couple with two children under 17 — $1,112 monthly

* Couple with two dependent adults — $1,400 monthly

Everyone in the world knows that if you are going to scam an asylum system, Canada is the place to do it. Roy Green is a talk radio host on Winnipeg’s CJOB 68. On his August 19, 2010 show he interviewed two guests. One was an immigrant from Mexico who came to Canada through the regular channel as a principal applicant. This gentleman speaks of an incident in (the province of) Quebec, when he was having dinner with his wife and conversing in Spanish.

Two young Mexicans approached and a conversation began. Turns out the young couple were on their honeymoon and had declared themselves as refugees here. Not because of any persecution in Mexico, but because they had researched the Canadian refugee system and knew that if on arrival in Canada, they applied for refugee protection, Canada would begin to pick up many of their expenses, provide free health benefits and access to social programs. At the end of the honeymoon (about three months) it was the plan of the young couple to return to Mexico and pick up their lives, after having just enjoyed a paid vacation in Canada (paid for by the Canadian taxpayer).

Camilo also points out that while no longer on the internet, not long ago a PDF document existed which instructed how to take advantage of the Canadian refugee system in order to obtain a year long vacation in Canada.

The other interviewee was a man residing in Toronto. He talks of his encounter with refugee claimants “and estimated only perhaps one in ten was a genuine refugee”. He spoke on air about one individual who showed a Canadian IRB (Immigration Refugee Board) adjudicator a scar on his abdomen, claiming the scar was from torture in his native country. The judge signed off on the refugee claim. The individual then admitted to Ghassan that the scar was from an altercation in a personal dispute with another individual.”

Showing scars is a tried and true trick in the book. This is what is going on right now in British Columbia. Some of the Tamil migrants are showing scars on their bodies that they hope will prove that they deserve asylum in Canada. Others are showing stumps on their bodies illustrating that they will mostly be on disability benefits and a drain on Canadian health care dollars. But my response to their scars and stumps is so what? How do we know the scar is from torture? How do we know that a lost limb is not the result of an accident or birth defect? But the real question is, if they will face persecution if returned to Sri Lanka?

As I have said before and I will say again the answer is…. no. There are several reasons for not granting any Sri Lankan asylum in Canada. The first is the war is over. The second is the war is over. The third is the war is over. The rest I explain here, here, and here.

Besides, why are we granting asylum to a people who have displayed a propensity to routinely return to the land of their alleged persecution? -Read FULL REPORT HERE-

ALSO READ:

Porous Border Problems

More Refugees To Support

600,000 “Refugees” Since 1987

Sudanese “Refugee” Turned Rapist

Canada Welcomes  All Undesirables

Chinese Man Knocking On Canada’s Backdoor

False Arguments Give For Population Growth

A White Racial Crisis

Map of countries and territories by fertility ...

Douglas Chism

Demographics are the facts and figures pertaining to various populations trends.

The science of demographics provides us with vital information concerning births and deaths, median age and affluence of a population, immigration and ethnic/racial shifts, and much more. This knowledge is important to our study of race.

Just 100 years ago, around the year 1900, there were approximately 2,000,000,000 persons inhabiting the earth. In fact, it had taken many thousands of years for a struggling population to even reach that relatively modest level.

Now, in only one century alone, due to scientific and technical advances in the production of food, the treatment of diseases, sanitary living conditions, and, most recently, welfare state social policies, planet earth’s population have grown to SEVEN BILLION (7,000,000,000 people).

The most significant factor in this unprecedented growth is that almost 98% of that increase has taken place among the populations of predominately NON-white countries.

If present trends and demographic predictions hold true, during the one-hundred year period from 1920 to 2020, the NON-white populations will have increased ONE HUNDRED TIMES (100X) that of Whites!

The BIG Picture

A report issued by the United States Immigration Commission around the turn of the previous century (circa 1900), stated that the Aryan (White) races made up almost half of the world’s total population. United States Census reports for the year 1920 indicated that one-third (33%) of the earth’s population was still White.

By 1970, Whites had come to account for only about one-quarter (25%) of the total world population, and today, at the beginning of the 21st century, less than ten percent (10%) of the earth’s population is still of essentially White European racial stock.

The actual figure varies between 7% – 10%, depending on how strictly our definition of “White” is applied. For example; some statistics include Jews in the category of White, and most include White Hispanics.

A White Racial Crisis

While precise percentages may vary, the pattern is perfectly clear: the White race is diminishing considerably in proportion to other races, and could quite conceivably find itself hurling headlong toward extinction, if steps are not taken to correct these disastrous demographic projections. The racial crisis is highlighted still more at the national level.

As recently as fifty years ago (1960), nearly ninety (90%) percent of Americans were White, but that percentage has been falling ever since.

Between 1980 and 1990 all NON-white populations in America increased steadily, while for the first time the percentage of Whites actually decreased. Today, while Whites maintain a slight majority at the national level, the NON-whites have already become majorities in some areas of the country, including several major cities.

Over the past decade, a full 75% of Canada’s immigrants have been NON-whites.

[Read: Canada's BLACK Population]

England is being slowly overwhelmed by a growing number of immigrants from her former (non-White) colonies.

Major cities in the Netherlands are expected to lose their White majorities within the next ten to fifteen years.

[Read: Blacks in Holland]

Scandinavian nations are besieged with immigrants and “refugees” seeking to take advantage of generous social welfare systems – systems designed by, and for the native White people, but are overwhelmed by alien interlopers.

[Read: Has SWEDEN Gone Insane?]

The story is the same throughout most of the White Western World. Even far-off Australia is struggling with an unprecedented influx of NON-white immigrants from neighboring islands.

The Triple Threat

There are three main factors that determine the direction of population change:

1) Immigration

2) Differential Fecundity

3) Miscegenation

The first of these, Immigration, is unquestionably the most serious threat to White Western Civilization, as we know it today. Ironically, immigration is the one factor that can be regulated and controlled….by law.

A Dying Breed

[...]

In any society, a mating couple must leave at least two (2) children behind to take their places after they’ve gone, in order to maintain a numerically stable population. The actual figure, statistically, is between 2.1 and 2.3 (depending on the level of civilization in a given country), to allow for accidental deaths and diseases, etc.

Today, not a single White Western nation has a fertility rate high enough to even maintain present population numbers. On average, the fertility rate for the White nations has fallen from 2.8 children per woman down to just 1.5 – this means white populations are actually diminishing, worldwide.

[...]

The Rising Tide of Color

The global population has skyrocketed to 7,000,000,000 people; and yet, demographic statistics show White Western populations diminishing. How can this be? [What’s the percentage (%) of WHITE people on Earth? Answer.]

The answer is simply that a full 98% of recent population growth has occurred in NON-white nations.

As of 2001, the total world population was still growing by about 1.2% per year – almost 77 million persons (every year!) – but, a full half (50%) of that, growth occurred in just six countries – all of them non-white countries (India, China, Pakistan, Nigeria, Bangladesh, and Indonesia). Much of the remaining growth was in sub-Saharan Africa and Middle East.

Source: United Nations, World Population Prospects: The 2006 Revision (2007).

Social Distortion

Burgeoning populations in the third-world and developing nations, compounds their own internal problems, contributes to their instability, and burdens the more civilized nations who try to render humanitarian aid.

The worsening social situation and comparatively low standard of living in those nations often compels NON-whites to emigrate in search of better living conditions – which, of course, brings us back full circle to the aforementioned problem of NON-whites immigrating into White Western Nations

Even without the immigration dilemma, the falling White birth rate is a harbinger of social chaos. It means children with few or no blood relatives beyond their parents; it means losing half the population every other generation; it means not enough young people in the work force to subsidize the growing number of elderly (e.g. pensions, social Security, etc.). At the same time, the median age of white populations continues to rise….. along with the rising tide of color.

Hybrid Theory

Miscegenation is the actual, biological intermingling of the races: interracial mating and the production of an adulterated, mix-breed racial type. The mating of two persons of diverse or different races necessarily brings about the end of family lineage – in racial terms – for both parents. The widespread mating of two distinctly different races means the eventual end of both races – in biological terms – and the creation of a new, bastardized, indeterminate  racial type. From a racial standpoint, miscegenation means death.  -Source-

[...]


ALSO READ:

Is Burlington TOO White?

Race Diversity – But Why?

White Males Under Attack

Racial Diversity – A CON Game

Embolden Minorities Eye Canada

***********************************

White Identity

Europe is Dying

Prophets Without Honor

Patrick J. Buchanan

In April 1968, only days after Dr. King had been assassinated and riots had erupted in 100 American cities… there arose in England to raise the alarm on the explosive issue of immigration from the Third World, a hero of the war and scholar of the classics, the Tory shadow minister of state for defense, Enoch Powell.

BRITAIN’s Enoch Powell in 1968

“The supreme function of statesmanship,” Powell began,“is to provide against preventable evils. … The discussion of future grave but, with effort now, avoidable evils is the most unpopular and at the same time the most necessary occupation for the politician.”

“Only resolute and urgent action,” said Powell, could avert the “horror” unfolding on the far side of the Atlantic. As he spoke, the immigrant flow into Britain from the Commonwealth nations of AfricaAsia and the Caribbean was 50,000 a year, a trickle compared to the 1,200,000 legal and illegal aliens who have been entering the United States every year for a generation.

Powell warned that if stern action were not taken to stem the tide by 2000, 5 million to 7 million Third-World people would be there [in Britain].


42 Years AFTER Enoch Powell’s Warning

“It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre,” Powell thundered.

Then he spoke the words that ended his brilliant career: [Peter Brimelow says: NO NO NO!] “As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see ‘the River Tiber foaming with much blood.”

Powell was instantly gone from the shadow cabinet, dropped by Edward Heath for what that future prime minister called a speech “racialist in tone, and liable to exacerbate racial tensions.”

Five years after Powell’s “Rivers of Blood” speech…. French writer Jean Raspail stunned Europe with his allegory, Le Camp Des Saints.”

Raspail described a “Last Chance Armada” of a million diseased and destitute from the hell-holes of Calcutta who embark aboard a fleet of leaky and decrepit ships and steer round the Cape of Good Hope to Europe – to be taken in, or die.

As the armada enters the Mediterranean and reaches the Riviera, the French government, awash in humanitarian liberalism, refuses to repel the invaders and invites them in. Around the world, the wretched of the earth watch the television reports, and wait. When the Last Chance Armada triumphs, its passengers emerge in an orgy of looting, rape and pillage to over-run the fat rich lands of the West, “The Camp of the Saints.”

[Read Canada's real life example of 'The Camp of the Saints']

Though many reviewers were repelled, the novel was a smashing success with some comparing Raspail’s work to Camus’ The Plague and Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels. “One of the most chilling books of this generation,” wrote James J. Kilpatrick. “Our children and grandchildren may soon discover that Jean Raspail wrote not fiction, but fact.”

In 2004, Raspail surfaced in Le Figaro to accuse the French elite of treason.  La Patrie Trahie par la Republique,” the title of his essay, translates, “The Fatherland Betrayed by the Republic.”

By “the Republic,” Raspail meant not just the Fifth Republic of Mitterand and Chirac, but France’s ideology of inclusiveness rooted in the Revolution’s ideology of  “liberte, egalite, fraternite.”

Alluding to the waves of immigrants from Africa, the Middle East, the Caribbean and Asia, Raspail grimly asserted: “The deed is done. … all of Europe marches to its death.”

[...]

Race riots have since plagued the industrial cities of Northern England. In France last summer, thousands of French citizens of North African descent rioted and pillaged in the banlieus of Paris and 300 other cities, until President Chirac, after 12 days, finally declared a national emergency.

[...]

Powell and Raspail were ostracized for what they said and wrote. Their stories are related in my new book, State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America.

Time to revisit the question: Were these men false prophets rightly reviled—or prophets without honor in their own countries?  -Source-

ALSO READ:

Suicide of the White Race

So, This Is England 2009

Destroying OUR Nation

Vanishing England

Mainstream Media Is Race Shy

By Vanishing American

[...]

The CofCC here notes that the Washington Post admits to avoiding racial facts in crime stories. The WaPo rationalizes that the media must be “sensitive and not overplay stories” where protected minorities are the principals.

Might this be the REAL reason? (ELN Editor)

[BLACKS represent only 12.5% of the U.S. and
Hispanics are included in the “White” Category]

This, of course, is not exactly news; other newspapers and outlets have admitted, somewhat defensively, that they avoid any mention of race in crime reports, presumably so that they don’t encourage any ‘racist‘ profiling or stereotyping. But isn’t this tantamount to concealing pertinent facts? When suspects are arrested, it’s pretty hard to conceal the race of the perpetrators. It all has to come out sometime. But in the meantime, while suspects are running loose in society, isn’t it immoral and unethical to conceal from the public the race of a suspect?

Let’s face it: race is one of the first things we notice about people, perhaps along with sex. When the worthless mainstream media (MSM) report that an attempted child abductor or murderer is at large, yet they refuse to tell us anything about him other than that he is wearing ‘dark clothing‘ or a ‘baseball cap‘, they are impeding law enforcement from speedily catching the suspect. They are preventing citizens from doing their part in helping to identify suspects, and to protect themselves or their loved ones avoid potential suspects.

But as with everything, political correctness, or ”racial sensitivity” as the WaPo would probably have it, trumps all. It trumps public safety, it trumps the protection of life and property, it slows down law enforcement. At worst it may cost lives.

The media are actively concealing the race of suspects in the name of being ‘sensitive’. In that way they are failing in their function to keep the public informed and thus to help us protect ourselves, and to aid in the apprehension of suspects.

Another manifestation of our racial confusion and obfuscation is the silly hair-splitting which goes on in racial categorizing. Not only do we have to contend with the ”race is a social construct” foolishness, but we have the ever-present people, sometimes on the ‘right’, who like to play games like asking ”well, what is White, anyway?” Occasionally someone like this will resurrect that canard about how ”at one time in this country, people thought the Irish weren’t White, and the Italians were considered non-White”, etc. Then we have the people who seem to pop up in blog comments saying ”but there are White Hispanics; Hispanic is not a race” and ”Iranians and people from India are Caucasian, and Caucasian is White, so they are White.” On and on it goes.

I think we do need to be more clear about what we mean. To me, White is synonymous with European descent, plain and simple. I would not classify Middle Easterners or people from India in the same category as European-descended people, no matter that some have lighter skin. Race is not ”just about skin color”; it encompasses more than skin pigmentation or the relative lack of it.

The term ‘Aryan’ is one that lends itself to further ambiguity, as people claim North Indians and Iranians are Aryan. That’s as may be; all I know is that they are not the same people as Europeans. ‘Caucasian’ is another confusing word as it can also be used to encompass people from the near East.

The last two terms tend to get the multiculturalists worked up into a lather, because they are often associated with extremists. Of course, let’s be honest: anybody who notices race is considered an ‘extremist’ by the ‘colorblind’ multicultists. You can run but you can’t hide from their ubiquitous brand of extremism, so it’s little use to try to assure them of your lack of ‘extremism.’

[..]

Race is not everything, but neither is it nothing; it is not a social construct, nor is it a matter of interpretation or semantics. It is simply a reality that must be dealt with; we can pretend it is plastic and changeable, a matter of choice or whim, or we can try to pretend it doesn’t exist. But that way lies madness, as we are beginning to see now. -Read FULL article HERE-

ALSO READ:

Slanted// MSM News

Race, Crime & Media

“News” Vs Propaganda

Turn Your Television OFF

Media Bias On Race Reporting

SWEDISH Reporters Muzzled

Independent Journalists – NOT!

Publisher’s Memo On Immigration

Mass Mind Control Through MSM

Swedish Media Soft On Immigrants

Mainstream Media Silent On Horrific Murders


Canada Is A Sinking Lifeboat

The Time Has Come

From: http://www.canadabnp.com/

As promised, something big is brewing, and I am now in a position to write about it.

The Canadian Red Ensign Society is a new Calgary-based group that is currently being incorporated. The Red Ensign Society is seeking to preserve and maintain the cultural, historical and political foundations that Canada was built upon.

This group is the only organised vehicle in Canada which will vigorously defend the dominance of the English language and advocate for the complete dismantling of official multiculturalism, as well as drastic reductions in immigration levels.

Below are the Red Ensign Society’s statement of principles, which can be viewed at the website:
www.canadianredensign.com

The Red Ensign Society Statement of Principles:

1) Canada must remain a predominately English Nation.

2) Canada is a nation of PIONEERS, not immigrants.

3) Official multiculturalism must be SCRAPPED and Canada’s intake of immigrants and refugees must be dramatically REDUCED.

4) Official multiculturalism and mass-immigration is a detriment to the country and is leading to the COLONIZATION of Canada by foreigners.

5) The loss of traditional freedoms and civil liberties is due in part to MASS-IMMIGRATION and the Islamic threat.

6) The Canadian Red Ensign Society believes that Canada must remain Canadian and will not waiver in advocating for the redress of the above wrongs that have been committed against the country.
___________________________________________________________________

Without exaggerating our situation, it is accurate to say that we are on the verge of losing our country. If you’ve read this blog and paid attention to the news, you know that mass-immigration is literally swamping Canada. If this is not corrected quickly, then the demographic disaster will be upon us.

If you care about Canada, then the most important thing you can do right at this moment is go to www.canadianredensign.com and email the group at info@canadianredensign.com to let them know that you want to help keep Canada…Canadian!

Time is running out for CANADA. We have to act NOW.  -Source-

ALSO READ:

Land Of Trusting Fools

Is Burlington TOO White?

How To Destroy A Nation

Embolden Minorities Eye Canada

Canada Open to Immigrant Abuse

Brainwashing University Students

Multiculturalism – A Dividing Force


How to Brainwash a Nation

and…

WHITE Americans – An Endangered Species

U.S. White Minority Soon

Whose Country Is This?

Switzerland, Too?

Cheap Anti-Racism Clichés

A John Key billboard in the Helensville electo...

New Zealand Prime Minister

Mike Courtman
NZ Conservative

I think it was John Derbyshire who once remarked that if someone hasn’t got something honest or intelligent to say about a controversial topic like race, then it’s best not to say anything. You don’t end up looking like a sanctimonious twat who arrogantly assumes they speak for everyone else.

A good example of a prominent white person opening his mouth and talking rubbish was provided by New Zealand Prime Minister John Key recently when he criticised Maori Party MP Hone Harawira for saying in a newspaper interview that he did not want one of his children dating a Pakeha (New Zealand European).

John Key responded by saying Mr Harawira’s comments were “unfortunate and ridiculous”.

If Mr Key, like many white people…. doesn’t feel comfortable answering questions about people’s personal views on racial matters, then nobody says he has to.

Instead, like so many other whites he has to come out with patronising anti-racial clichés, which probably conflict with the views of a signficant percentage of  New Zealanders.

[See: An Australian example of White hypocrisy]

Predictably, it took a NON-white to come up an honest and sensible answer to Harawira’s comments.

Maori Party co-leader Peter Sharples said Harawira was entitled to his own views, and his comments probably reflected how a lot of people thought. “I think it’s not divisive at all. It’s a point of view”.

Mr Harawira’s comments aren’t racist, unless your definition of racism, means that people aren’t allowed to have opinions about preserving their own culture. If every Maori in New Zealand married a European New Zealander, then soon, there wouldn’t be any Maori culture left.

People are the carriers of particular cultures and if everyone mixes with everyone else then there will only be one big global mono-culture, with one language, one history and one set of customs and values, and nation states reduced to bland economic units serving globalist bureaucrats and multi-nationals. -Source-

ALSO READ:

Racism Is Not Sinful

Racial Diversity, NOT!

A Sense Of Belonging (U.K.)

Diversity Is No Buffet (U.K.)

The Dreaded “Racist” Label (U.S)

White People Are Hypocrites (U.S.)

Is Racial Separation Immoral?

Multiculturalism – A Dividing Force

Racism – The New Witchcraft Hysteria

Canada Open To Immigrant Abuse

MP Ruby Dhalla

Ruby Dhalla, Liberal MP

By PaxCanadiana

This article appeared in the Winnipeg Sun. Though it is an argument as to why English (and French) should be mandatory for all potential immigrants, the piece does highlight how family reunification has been abused to sidestep such trivialities as language proficiency and pertinent job skills to import, what are (dare I say?) second or third-rate immigrants into the country.

Over the years, Canada’s liberal multicultural policy has encouraged family re-unifications, letting in members and spouses (within just six months) without demanding any language proficiency or educational qualifications.

The intent of this policy may have been benign, but the consequences have not been so benign. People have taken advantage of this policy to import into Canada their whole clans.

By waiving linguistic proficiency for family members, Canada has indeed helped spawn a scandalous spousal industry in its immigrant communities.

Imported spouses

Since they have grown so big, do most immigrant communities need wholesale imports of off-shore spouses? Not really. It is their greed that guides them to seek off-shore spouses from whose families they take huge amounts of money — called dowry.

Because people in India, Pakistan and elsewhere are so desperate to get their children — and later themselves — into Canada, they become willing victims of these sharks from Canada. In fact, there have been some morally shocking cases where Toronto-area immigrant men arranged fake marriages with their sisters in their native countries to bring them to Canada as their “wives.”

[...]

But the worst case of exploitation of this linguistic-requirement waiver has been its sinister use by immigrant families to bring in their elderly parents or relatives on the grounds of taking care of them.

In vast numbers of cases, these elderly people have been brought here to (Canada) serve as cash cows since they fetch old-age pensions for these families. Go to any mall in Mississauga or Brampton, Ont., and you will invariably find many of these (foreign) elderly people wandering around aimlessly and feeling lost.

The Springdale neighbourhood of Brampton, Ontario has a heavy Sikh population. So ubiquitous are elderly Indian immigrants in the area that you’d think it was a retirement community. After reading the above it makes sense now.

It’s apparent that they have been imported to take advantage of (OUR) old age security benefits, and to being a burden on Canadian tax payers with their (free) health care needs.

Indeed, waiting lists have increased in Brampton-Springdale, and a scarcity of patient beds has arisen because of the flood of aged East Indian immigrants. I don’t see how this benefits Canadians or the economy.

[See: Canadian Generosity Vs. Stupidity

Foreign Seniors Displacing Canadians]

This explains why the Brampton-Springdale Liberal MP (Member of Parliament], who is a Canadian born Sikh to Punjabi immigrants, had tabled a private member’s bill, Bill C-428, that would grant old age security benefits to immigrants after a mere three year (Canadian residency) period. It was due to community pressure and a desperate need to hold onto her (Ruby Dhalla) seat which she almost lost at the last election.

It’s not just the importation of elderly immigrants that is a problem. The importation of unskilled family members of working age is burdensome as well. We introduce these people into Canadian society, and (our) labour market…. only to dole out more millions of dollars just to teach them to speak English or French, as well as job skills training. Does this make sense?

Family reunification, along with the refugee system, has been the means by which otherwise INADMISSIBLE immigrants were able to get into Canada.

[See: Fed-Up Canadians]

Needing neither language skills, nor any pertinent job skills, the Canadian labour market has been flooded with unskilled immigrant labour.

Toronto is home to so many “new Canadians” that it leaves one scratching their head wondering how they even got into (our) country…if, we are to assume that the Canadian immigration system is geared to favour the “best and brightest” with a focus on job growth.

The writer of the article points out why this has been allowed to continue. Since a pathetic three year residency is all that’s needed to turn one into an instant Canadian, these family class immigrants will become eligible to vote, and that’s what really matters now, doesn’t it?  –Canadian Immigration Reform– (All highlighted words by ELN Editor)

ALSO READ:

The Sikhs of Vancouver

Is Burlington TOO White?

The Land Of Trusting Fools

Canada’s “Nanny” Loophole

Canada Is Too Accommodating

Costly “Special Interest” Groups

White Woman Faces Job Discrimination

No Punjabi? No Job For Canadian Nurse