Monthly Archives: September 2010

Canadian Immigration Policy Reform

A Canadian Customs and Immigration service sign

Did you know?

1. Immigration increases the size of Canada’s population and economy, but does NOT improve Canadians’ standard of living.

2.  It is estimated that recent immigrants receive BILLION$ of dollars a year more in benefits, than they pay in taxes.

3. Only 17% of immigrants admitted each year are fully assessed on the basis of their employment and language skills. (Or conversely, a whopping 83% of new immigrants are NOT assessed!)

4. While the average age of Canadians is increasing and the proportion of seniors will almost double in the next few decades, immigration will do very little to offset this trend despite the widely held belief that it will do so.

5.  There are more than 100,000 (FOREIGN) parents and grandparents of immigrants who have met requirements and are waiting to enter Canada. They will receive the benefits of our public health care system without having contributed to costs by paying income tax.

6. Most of the quarter of million people who immigrate to Canada every year are NOT interviewed by a visa officer, to determine if they are well-suited to integrate into Canadian society and its economy.

7. Far more Canadians want immigration levels LOWERED rather than increased. Despite this, and the lack of economic or demographic benefits to Canadians, we maintain the highest per capita intake in the world.

8. In terms of Canadians’ attitude towards a multicultural mosaic, a 2007 survey indicated that 18%  thought that it is reasonable to accommodate religious and cultural minorities while 53% thought immigrants should adapt fully to Canadian culture.

9. The number of visible-minority neighbourhoods in Canada’s three largest cities (Toronto, Montreal & Vancouver) increased from six in 1981 to 254 in 2001.

10. Canada’s acceptance rate for refugee claimants is three times (3X) the average of other countries, suggesting that two-thirds of those accepted would probably NOT be considered genuine refugees by other countries.

11. In 2003, Canada accepted 76% of refugee claims by Sri Lankans, while Britain accepted 2% and Germany 4%. That year Canada accepted 1,749 refugee claims by Sri Lankans while all  other countries (combined) accepted only 1,160.

12. Canada, uniquely among nations, allows (foreign) nationals of many democratic countries with good human rights records to make refugee claims in Canada on the basis that they fear “persecution” in their (own) homelands.

13.  As cities have increased in population, largely because of international immigration, urban expansion has devoured a large amount of Canada’s best, Class 1,  agricultural land, consuming 7,400 kilometers between 1971 and 2001 and occupying 7%  of the total during this period.

(Source) Centre for Immigration Policy Reform

(Some CAPITALIZED words, Bold print, (parentheses), including added links are by ELN Editor for emphasis)

Report ILLEGAL Immigrants

ALSO READ:

Fed-Up Canadians

More Refugees To Support

Australia’s Silent Invasion

Canada Accepts Undesirables

Canadian Generosity Vs Stupidity

Windsor’s Border Crossing is Wide Open


A Vanishing Breed, Indeed!

OTHER Immigration Sites of Interest:

Related Articles

What is Miscegenation?

mis·ceg·e·na·tion

–noun

 

1. …heterosexual marriage/cohabitation between different races….usually a black/white coupling in the U.S.
2. …interbreeding between members of different races.
3. …the mixing or a mixture of races by interbreeding.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Richard D. Fuerle
ErectusWalks Amongst Us
…excerpts from Chapter 29
[...]
No dog lover would want all the breeds of dogs to interbreed, so that all dogs are mongrels. No breeder of race horses would want his thoroughbreds to breed with common riding ponies. No garden lover wants all his flowers to come in only a single color or shape, or his tomatoes or apples in only a single variety, and no oenophile (wine lover) would want only a single red wine and a single white wine to choose from.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Only those driven mad by the maladaptive ideology of egalitarianism, cheer the loss of diversity that results from their demands for more of it. 6 To borrow from the anti-racists, one might call the end result of miscegenation, “Life without rainbows.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Egalitarians love diversity so much that they insist that everything – our corporations, restaurants, hotels, neighborhoods, schools, television, movies, and textbooks 7 must all be diverse – everything, that is, except people, who must miscegenate to become the same and therefore equal.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They were overjoyed in 2003 when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 8 that “diversity” (i.e., racial quotas) is so important that colleges can legally violate the Fourteenth Amendment, 9 but only for 25 yrs, by discriminating against Eurasians in order to achieve diversity in their student bodies. But their love of diversity is different from the love others have for it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Egalitarians love diversity not as an end, but as a means. They do not want to preserve the diversity of the peoples of this planet; they want to destroy it. Making all human contact diverse is simply their means for destroying human diversity. Mix the races physically, and they will mix biologically on their own. 10 Diversity to destroy diversity.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The loss of biological diversity, which most of us would not wish on the living things we love and value, egalitarians wish upon man himself.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Some egalitarians openly encourage miscegenation, while others even condemn the failure to miscegenate as “racist,” 11 and still others argue that everyone might as well miscegenate because everyone is already a mixture. In the sense that the races share most alleles (as do people and chimps), everyone is a mixture but, as we shall see in the next chapter, there are major differences between (1) people within a population interbreeding and (2) people from very different populations interbreeding.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is not necessary to involve the government in people’s intimate decisions in order to reduce miscegenation and preserve the uniqueness of the Earth’s peoples. People themselves, given their freedom, can accomplish this. They can segregate themselves, as suggested in Chapter 31. 12 They can boycott movies, television, and books that show or advocate miscegenation. And they can ostracize those who practice, encourage, or condone it. Parents can disapprove of their children dating inter-racially and withhold benefits, such as weddings, gifts, inheritances, and social support from children who defy their wishes and reject their own people as mates.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They can cite statistics showing that they are many times as likely to get a STD (sexually transmitted disease) from a black as from a white (Chapter 12, Note (4)) and, for females, many times as likely to be beaten, raped, and murdered. 13 Many things can be done but, until people come to believe that it is desirable and morally good to preserve their own genetic heritage, nothing will be done.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The race mixers love to point out that white men fear that black men will take “their” women. Of course, they fear that; 14 for a white man, it’s a significant loss in fitness. The biological purpose of a male of any species is to pass on his alleles, and the principal way he does this is by impregnating females. But he gets a big bonus if he impregnates a woman who already has more of the same alleles that he has, i.e., someone of the same race (Chapter 8, FN 4), and his fitness falls if he lets someone of another race impregnate “his” women (and similarly for women).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This biological purpose implies, of course, that he must not only compete against other men, particularly men of a different race, but win that competition. If he does not even try to win and, indeed, facilitates his own failure, then his unique collection of alleles, including the alleles that made him a biological loser, are out of the game. 15
[...]
Another way of looking at miscegenation is from the viewpoint of eugenics. If blacks and whites engage in miscegenation, the mulatto progeny will have characteristics of both races. 18 Will the two races regard the mullatos as “improved” children? Although there are no polls on this question, other evidence suggests that more blacks would see it as an improvement than whites. 19 As we have seen, blacks are genetically primitive humans, who have evolved a lesser distance away from our ape LCA. They have alleles that are many millions of years old – chimpanzees and gorillas have them, but Eurasians do not (Chapter 16, FN 17). Admitting those and other primitive alleles into the white genome would undo hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of years of white evolution. 20 Both blacks and whites regard the primitive features of blacks as undesirable (p. 96). Both white and black children prefer playing with white dolls. 21 And the push behind integration has been blacks wanting to be around whites… not whites wanting to be around blacks.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mulattos resent the fact that they can never be “white,” and must accept a lower status as a “black.” They become hostile towards whites, who are the higher status group, even though they would have an even lower status if they were not partly white. Thus, whites who have mulatto children create enemies of whites, including themselves, another reason for whites to oppose miscegenation. 22
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Most mixed race breeding occurs at the margins, where a white woman is undesirable to white men (overweight, ugly, old, addicted to drugs, mentally ill, low IQ, etc.) or has been rejected by a white man, resulting in a deep hatred of all white men…. or the black man may be rich and/or famous (e.g., Tiger Woods, O.J. Simpson), though there are some cases where the explanation is not readily apparent (e.g., blond German model Heidi Klum). >…continue to read full chapter HERE.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ALSO READ:

Crisis and Opportunity

Samuel J. Phillips

White advocates are the most despised minority in the world.

Throughout the post-West, “racist” is used as a slur by both conservatives and progressives.  Even loose affiliations with proscribed figures or organizations can doom a political career.  The vast majority of whites, out of fear, desire for conformity, or sincere conviction, believe that “racism” is a sin, perhaps only rivaled by murder.

“Racism” may actually be worse…as even, serial killer and cannibal Jeffrey Dahmer thought it was important that people know he was no “racist” and didn’t choose his victims for that reason.

If it is suspected that you are a “racist”, your friends, family and colleagues may shun… or even attack you.  Even the most capable and effective of the few spokesmen for white advocacy are either smeared or ignored by the mainstream media.

Nonetheless, white advocates dominate political discourse in the United States today. Almost every issue, movement, and political figure is analyzed not on its own terms, but as a possible indicator of white racial consciousness and explicit white political mobilization.

The most important development in contemporary politics is the growth of the “Tea Party” movement.  This is the name given to a loose affiliation of many independent groups unified around an agenda of opposition to President Obama’s economic policies, concern over the rapidly expanding federal debt, and anxiety over violations of the Constitution.

The problems with this movement from a white advocacy perspective are obvious.  The group is focused on narrow fiscal concerns, ruthlessly purges any hint of explicit racial consciousness, and is funded and resourced by the usual open borders corporate elites such as Dick Armey or the Koch brothers.

Many leading spokespeople of the movement, such as Glenn Beck, Ron Paul, and Sarah Palin, differ on critical issues such as foreign policy and immigration but are all united in their effusive reverence for Martin Luther King Jr. In responding to charges of racism, Tea Party leaders look for minorities to put behind the speakers’ podium rather than attacking or even just dismissing the charge itself.

Even admitting all that, it is impossible not to view the rise of the Tea Parties as a powerful example of implicit white racial consciousness. Some white advocates read into the Tea Party movement a racial consciousness that they think already exists, but is merely submerged.  >continued HERE.

ALSO READ:

The RACISM Ploy

The “RACIST” Label

The Right To Discriminate

Is Racial Separation Immoral?

To Recognize Racial Differences

Importing Jamaican “Culture”

(en) Jamaica Location (he) מיקום ג'מייקה

Image via Wikipedia

PaxCanadiana

Canada Imports Jamaican Culture of Single Mothers-Multiple Fathers

Where are the fathers? There’s a hidden crisis in [Toronto]. Single mothers speak out about the scary struggle to raise children who don’t expect to survive past the age of 25.

In other, and I am sure unrelated, news “Parents, kids flee hail of bullets”.

Residents run for cover as gunfight erupts to disrupt barbecue near home where Jordan Manners lived.

The absent “father”, and the mother of children by different men is often cited as a characteristic of members of gang culture.

[Recent story:  Clifenton Ford, 38 yrs. old, a father of TEN (10) kids is TORONTO's latest murder victim.]
The SIX (6) different women who have mothered his children, stopped by the sports bar on Eglinton Ave. E. near Midland Ave. to pay their respects the morning after Ford was gunned down.]

It is also a cultural norm of Jamaica. So is gun violence.

[TORONTO POLICE - MOST WANTED]
(Note the lack of “Canadian content”)

When you allow the importation of a people whose home country indulges in such behaviour, what do you expect from them when they come to Canada?

[Report ILLEGAL Immigrants]

Immigration to Canada is not a human right. Canadian immigration policy is not an exercise in charity. It is supposed to benefit the country and its people, save in the case of asylum seekers, who genuinely need protection from persecution, and not the refugee frauds that have gamed our system (I’m also looking at you TAMILS, MEXICANS, ISRAELIS, SOMALIS).

Canada’s immigration policy does not benefit the vast majority of Canadians, but it does benefit the immigrant (and his or her soon to be imported relatives), ethnic communities, and those whose livelihood is dependent on the importation of people.

Our immigration system has failed this country in the importation of people from socially dysfunctional and culturally incompatible societies.

JAMAICA is one such country.

[Read: Black Culture Retarding White Kids]

Canada is under no obligation to allow Jamaicans, or anyone else for that matter, to immigrate here. In instances where social mis-behaviour is apparent, then Canada should stop bringing those people in.

The problem is not illegal guns imported from the U.S. The problem is that, we Canadians, allowed the importation of a foreign culture whose people are willing to use them. >Continue to read commentary

[Note: This short essay was originally posted by PaxCanadiana over 3 years ago, but could have easily been written yesterday. The main elements to this story have not changed one iota, and unfortunately for Canada, will only escalate for future Canadian generations. There is one other important element that's missing here .... who financially supports these single mothers with multiple off-springs from different fathers?

Hint: It's not the sperm-donors, dead or alive!

Yes, "Toronto the Good" was an apt description for this once-great city before mass 3rd World immigration began to "muddy the waters". - ELN editor]

ALSO READ:

Blacks Less Intelligent?

More Fall-Out On Black IQ

Racial “Diversity” Is A Con Game

Multiculturalism – A Dividing Force

Is Racial Diversity Good For Canada?

…and

Declining Western Nations

“Right” Thinking In Germany

Gang Rapists Are Majority NON-White

A Racial Program For The 20th Century

50,000,000 Africans INVITED To Europe

Related articles

What IS Statism?

Life (NBC TV series)

Fulton Huxtable

Statism is a doctrine that maintains, that your life, money and property are not yours… but the property of the state.  A statist is any person who upholds this doctrine and/or supports its implementation.

A statist knows that he cannot get away with—at least, not yet—openly declaring that your life, money and property are not yours, so he advances these ideas by implicit means.

Statists enact laws that forbid you from taking certain actions altogether or only if you have their permission—and the idea is: if you may only act by permission, you do not have a right to your life.

Statists, through their regulations, decide how much of your money you will be allowed to keep—and the idea is: if you do not have the right to decide how your money is spent, your money is not yours.

Statists issue decrees restricting how you may use your property—and the idea is: if you do not have the right to control the use and disposal of your property, your property is not yours.   These are the indirect means by which statists promote and carry out their ideas.

An adult statist is grown up, physically, but in a state of self-arrested, stunted, mental development.  His worldview is that of a child who can only do what his parents permit and who is dependent on his parents for everything.

In the adult world, he seeks to forcibly impose this view on others. You are the child and the state, run by statists, is the parent.  The statist may do anything he wants, while you may only do what the statist permits—bringing us a complete reversal of the way it should be.  In fact, you should be free to do whatever you want (so long as you do not violate the right of another to do the same), while government officials should only be able to do what the law specifically permits—and no more.

The irony of it all is the fact that statists, left to their own devices, are impotent, powerless to harm you.  The power that they wield comes from the willing support of their victims, from the very people they control, from any and all who earn a living and produce the financial and material means statists use to regulate others.

All that it would take for statists to lose this power over you, is to stop supporting them.  A statist’s greatest fear is your discovery of this fact.

In his impotence, a statist seeks to escape the terror of facing reality by ruling the competent, the capable—those who do face reality.  In a free society, statists would only be able to rise to the level of their ability, which, for most, would not be very far.  In a statist society, their ability to produce is irrelevant.  They can rise to the extent to which they are able to forcibly harness others—taking statists to heights impossible to them in a free society.

A statist hates self-reliance, so he forces you to rely on others and others to rely on you.  He will use anyone and anything to control you and force you into dependence: your children, your elderly parents, your neighbors who have fallen on hard times, your friends who are ill.  Every human problem or disaster is an opportunity to be capitalized upon by a statist—another chance to enlarge his powers.

A statist is that schoolyard bully, or one of his equal during your childhood years.  But now he is grown up, all dressed up in a suit.  The only way he can allay his constant anxiety and dread is through the control and intimidation of others.  He doesn’t want to conquer nature…. but only other men.  He wants to cheat reality, not abide by it.  He wants to get away with living… not live his life on his own.

A statist only has self-identity if the eyes of others are focused on him.  He only feels alive if is he is part of some group, so he forces others into adoring, dependent herds who must curry his favor to survive.

A statist hates the independent mind, since he doesn’t have one of his own. He can’t really think…..he can only manipulate words, ideas that are cut off from reality, emotions and other people—these are his only reality.  To a statist, reality is not real—thus, the truth doesn’t matter.  Lies, deception—and the truth, on occasion—are interchangeable tools, one as valid as another, to be used to pander to the worst in man: the desire for the unearned.

A statist is that mooching relative, now a bureaucrat, for whom there can never be enough handouts.  He is a panhandler with a gun who despises your charity as an insult, but claims your money as a right.  He is a criminal who has gone from bad to worse: an armed robber doesn’t try to convince you that he is taking your money for your own good, but a statist politician does.

Such is the face and soul of a statist.

Before you vote for another statist politician, ask yourself this: would you—and take this literally—sign a legal document giving control over you life, money and property to another person—let’s say, to your Congressman?  I doubt it.  I doubt if even many of the witless supporters of statism would do this, yet this is precisely what you effectively do when you support statism.  When you vote for statist politicians, you give them a proxy, a power of attorney of sorts, to carry out their ideas in practice, to vote away some part of your life, money and property.

The liberation of your life and the recognition of your right to it—to live it without seeking anyone’s permission—will only come once you revoke that proxy given to statists.  Once this occurs, the rebirth of freedom will begin in earnest. >Source

Related Articles

“Right” Thinking In Germany

Thilo Sarrazin

By Mike Smith

An “earthquake” has hit Germany in the form of Thilo Sarrazin’s book, “Deutschland Shafft sich ab”. (“Germany Abolishes Itself” in which he discusses the breakdown of German society through immigration)

After two weeks, the sixth print has already been sold out. I am currently reading this work and following the reaction of ordinary Germans and the politicians in their local media.

But why the controversy? Well, for that, one has to understand a bit of the German psyche.

First of all Germans are for the most part an intelligent people. Their leadership in Scientific and technological advances is well known. Something made in Germany is synonymous with quality as opposed to something made in China that is synonymous with poor quality.

Germans are very proud and hard-working. Their country has been destroyed through war twice in the last century and they rebuilt it twice. Germans are punctual, focused and have a work ethic that is probably the highest in the world that I have seen…

However, the Germans also suffer from a tremendous guilt complex that has been brainwashed into their minds since a young age over the Jewish holocaust. Most Germans today, were not even born until after the Second World War, never had anything to do with anti-Semitism, but have been brainwashed to believe that they are collectively responsible and guilty of the holocaust.

[...]

Along comes Thilo Sarrazin and says what is on the minds of 90% of Germans, but what they are all too scared to admit in company, lest they be branded as evil “racists”.

Sarrazin was the correct man of the moment to say it. If it was anybody from the right, like the NPD (Nationalists), the Germans and the world would have dismissed it as Neo-Nazi junk and it would have been forgotten in a few days.

Sarrazin, however has excellent credentials. He has been a loyal civil servant for most of his life. He was the former finance minister for Berlin (a City state), he is the current head of the German Reserve Bank, and a Liberal politician belonging to the Social Democratic Party or SPD.

Sarrazin is the latest voice to see the writing on the wall for Europe, to see the dangers of encroaching Islamification of Europe. Recently we have seen a tendency in Europe to vote RIGHT. After the death (probably an assassination) of Nationalist leader Jörg Haider in Austria… Austria voted RIGHT.

[...]

The issues that Sarrazin mentions in his book are only discussed behind closed doors, and at private barbeques amongst close friends in Germany.

What Sarrazin did, was to put the discussion in the open. He created a “Stimmungsbarometer”, a gauge to see where the German people stand at this stage of the fight.

Needless to say, the “left” was quite perturbed to find out that 90% of Germans supported everything Sarrazin said. They thought that their decades of socialist brainwashing would be enough to change the minds of the Germans, but they finally got a wake-up call. Nationalism cannot be suppressed. It is the strongest natural force inside of us and the harder you try to suppress it the stronger it comes out.

[...]

What Sarrazin is saying is all true…Germany and Germans are getting poorer and dumber by the day…. because of unchecked immigration.

At first when he uttered the truth, he was ridiculed by the press and by politicians. They all hoped he would disappear into the political fog. Then the first and second prints of his book were sold out in the first two days. And so it continued…they started with 25,000 copies, and now standing at 100,000 copies per day….Continue to FULL article.

ALSO READ:

Germany’s Lost Cities

German Truth Be Told

Declining Western Nations

50,000,000 Africans INVITED To Europe

…and some WWII information

After The Reich

Tears For Dresden

To “Flight” Or Not

Map of the United States with the Pan-African ...

United States of America

 

Vanishing American

Have any of you read this piece?

It is along the lines of the ongoing discussion we had a while back ‘fight or flight?’ – asking whether there was anyplace to go to evade the onslaught of forced demographic change.

A persistent belief among many of the proponents of ‘‘flight” is that The Northwest is the promised land.

This idea persists: Pastor Chuck Baldwin writes about his decision to head for Montana. His motivations may have more to do with being among ‘freedom-minded people‘ than with seeking a remnant of old America, so his story may not be typical. But it’s an inescapable fact that areas which are demographically transformed become more ”liberal”, inevitably.

[...]

Another persistent line of thought is that the South is ‘lost’ and that it should be abandoned to its fate, as the SBDL blogger infers. He sees little likelihood that the South will maintain its integrity, or regain it, presuming it is lost.

Personally, I am not willing to write off the South, as some have urged that we do. First, it’s literally the land where my fathers died, some under the flag of the Confederacy. I suppose that makes me a diehard, but I have a great deal of sentiment and passion for the South, not just Texas, but the South as a nation unto itself.

The reason some are writing the South off, is that we read in various newspaper articles about the new black exodus from the North or the East back to their Southern ‘roots.’ Now this strikes me as odd because the South is depicted as this dark land where slavery and cruel Jim Crow held sway up until the 1960s, and up until this very day, according to many. I hear that Glenn Beck himself spends a good bit of time bashing the bad old South, one more reason for me to disdain him.

Is there a real exodus of black people to the South? Or is this just a liberal media storyline that they are promoting in service of their agenda? Many of the articles I’ve read, (assuming that we can believe anything the old media write on anything to do with race), depict black ‘professionals’, middle-class people, as returning to places like Atlanta or Charlotte or wherever, because of cheaper costs of living and their ‘African-American culture’.

I am not sure that there is a mass movement of blacks in general to the South. And if there is such a thing, I would wager it would be directed towards the urban South, not towards the smaller towns or the rural areas.

So Southron cities may become even more ”diverse” (read: NON-white) than they already are. I think it’s probably safe to say that all urban areas are pretty much diversity-dominated these days — and guess what: that is true of the North, the Northwest, the East Coast, or wherever. Even Anchorage, Alaska has its share of ”diversity”.

The Northwest, that supposed haven for ”non-diverse”, boringly White people, is becoming more and more ”vibrant” by the day. Some people from other parts of the country claim that Seattle, for example, is very White. I would say that such people have likely spent little time in Seattle. It might have been very White 40 or more years ago. Not now. Seattle is now properly ”enriched” with East African gangs, Samoan gangs, Hispanic gangs, Af-Am gangs, you name it. There are ethnic enclaves of various kinds there.

This website is devoted to information on gangs throughout the Northwest.

The Northwest is not what it is cracked up to be as far as being a last bastion of the old America. Not only is it no longer ”boringly White” but it is also mostly very liberal, with the exception of rural areas — and those areas are now being settled by Hispanics, mostly illegal, who arrive as agricultural workers.

Demographic Maps

[Check your own town for a racial figure]

I hear it said that Portland, Oregon is ‘mostly White’, and I confess it’s been some years since I was in Portland, but I cannot believe that Portland, as liberal as it is, is not a magnet for ”diversity” and ”vibrancy.” The state of Oregon has seen quite an increase in Hispanic immigration, as have parts of Washington, and even Idaho, if you read the newspapers, is now receiving a special delivery shipment of refugees.

As for the cities, I have a news flash: urban America is already at a saturation point of ”vibrancy.” Cities in general are capitals of the new changeling America, as I refer to it, to the New Babel.

Is the South any worse in this regard? I would doubt that. I have been around this country, to the far corners of it, from Canada to Mexico. I don’t know that any place is immune to what is happening to this country, or, more correctly, to the engineered transformation of this land by movement of peoples from the Third World.

If you read the blog Refugee Resettlement Watch, which is on my blogroll, you will realize how even the more remote areas of this country are now being presented with refugees who are placed there seemingly with the intent of breaking up the existing demographics.

You can run, but you can’t hide, as the saying goes. Somewhere, the diversicrats have you and your town in their sights. >>Full Article and commentary

[...]

ALSO READ:

W.H.A.M.

The White City

U.S. White Minority SOON

Racial “Diversity” Is A Con Game

Pied Piper Requires Payment Soon

100,000,000 NON-Whites In U.S.A.

Multiculturalism – A Dividing Force

WHITE People – An Endangered Species

“A Racial Program for the 20th Century”

“We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is RACIAL TENSION. By propounding into the consciousness of the DARK races, that for centuries they have been oppressed by Whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory.

While inflaming the Negro minority against the Whites, we will endeavor to instill in the Whites, a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negros.

We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the PROFESSIONS, and in the world of SPORTS and ENTERTAINMENT.

With this prestige, the Negro will be able to INTER-MARRY with the Whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.”

AUTHOR – Israel Cohen (Zionist — Communist — Internationalist) “A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century” >>>>Published in 1912

On June 17, 1957, the above passage was read into the United States Congressional Record by Rep. Thomas G. Abernathy. …read more Here.

(Transcribed from video below) “I think there is a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time, EUROPE has NOT YET LEARNED HOW to be MULTICULTURAL. And I think WE (Jews) are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which MUST take place.

Europe is NOT going to be the monolithic societies THEY (Europeans) once were in the last century. JEWS are going to be at the CENTRE of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They (Europeans) are now going into a MULTICULTURAL mode and Jews will be resented because of OUR LEADING ROLE. But without that leading role, and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.”


If “somebody” doesn’t want you seeing the TRUTH on Youtube, and they pull it, go HERE.

(Karl Marx in a letter to Baruch Levy, quoted in Review de Paris, June 1, 1928, p. 574 says below:)

“The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world domination by the dissolution of other races (multiculturalism)…and by the establishment of a world republic in which everywhere the Jews will exercise the privilege of citizenship.

In this New World Order, the Children of Israel…will furnish ALL the leaders without encountering opposition…”

Below is an excerpt of a speech given by Rabbi Emanuel Rabinovich to a special meeting of the Emergency Council of European Rabbis in Budapest, Hungary, January 12, 1952.

“Our (Jewish) Control Commissions will, in the interests of peace and wiping out inter-racial tensions, FORBID WHITES TO MATE WITH WHITES. The white women must cohabit with members of the dark races, the white men with black women. Thus the white race will disappear, for mixing the dark with the white means the end of the white man, and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory.”  ….more HERE (at Karma of the Chosen)

Did You Know?

…also “What’s Behind the Kosher Scam?”

ALSO READ:

“So the Jews say”

Tail Wagging The Dog

“Diversity” – A Con Game

The Host And The Parasite

**********************************

Jane Gardener Speaks Her Mind

Hollywood Pushes INTER-Racial Marriage

Benjamin Freedman's Address to U.S. Marines

A Jewish Defector (Benjamin Freedman) Warns America >1961

***************************************************************************

The Harold Rosenthal Interview (Part 1)

The Harold Rosenthal Interview (Part 2)

The Harold Rosenthal Interview (Part 3)

The Harold Rosenthal Interview (Final)

…in addition:

Vanishing England

Closer To The Edge

Diversity Is A Fraud

*************************

Multi-Racial IRELAND?

Destroying OUR Nation

One Million Brits Emigrate

********************************

Has SWEDEN Gone Insane?

How Britain Destroyed Itself

“Embracing” Racial Diversity

**********************************

Britain’s Immigration Fiasco

The Great Escape From Britain

Multi-culti Breakdown In Britain

England – From Titan to Defeatist

***************************************

Racial “Diversity” Is A Con Game

Multiculturalism – A Dividing Force

“Common Purpose” Is To Brainwash

Gang Rapists Are Majority NON-White

*********************************************

50,000,000 Africans INVITED To Europe

London Street Celebrations – A Contrast View

Multi-Culti Used To Destroy National Identity

**************************************

Tears For Dresden, Germany

Dresden’s 14 Hours Of HELL

Luftwaffe Pilot Spared B-17 Pilot’s Life

*********************************************

German Truth Be Told

German Ethnic Cleansing

Some Suppressed Post-War History


Declining Western Nations

Enoch Powell appearing on television discussio...

Enoch Powell in 1987

The Irish Savant

If you’ve been reading the comments to the previous few posts (here), you’ll have noticed something of a debate going on about the future of western civilization, between what we might call optimists and pessimists.

In essence, the optimists’ argument is that Whites have taken so much crap and abuse in recent decades, that the backlash is coming. The pessimists on the other hand argue that things have gone too far, that we’re in an irrecoverable death spiral.

I reluctantly have to agree with the pessimists.

A bit of context: If western people had been told, say forty years ago (1970), that their countries would — within a couple of decades — be overwhelmed by un-assimilable, 3rd world immigrants,

…that they would be forced to give preferential treatment to such immigrants in jobs, housing, education and welfare,

…that their freedom of speech would be drastically curtailed,

…that their taxes would go to welfare for these interlopers,

…that they’d be bombarded day and night by demeaning anti-white hate speech – had they known this, what would have happened?

Had they been told the truth, there would have been riots in the streets and mass mobilization against this destruction. O.K… Britain’s Enoch Powell did tell them, but as we know he was howled down, vilified and ridiculed to a degree which shattered his credibility with the proverbial man in the street.

BRITAIN’s Enoch Powell in 1968

So my point here is that, not only have all those things happened, but whites have more or less quietly acquiesced all the way along. Why should they/we suddenly rise up against it now?

In fact the converse – that we’ll become even more supine – is a far more likely outcome. Bear in mind that the MSM has been totally taken over, as have our education systems. Thus our young people will have known nothing but a diet of pro-black, pro-Muslim propaganda, supplemented with a corresponding programme of white vilification.

I know many white people who actually hate whiteness and Western-ness – all the things that define them and provided them with such an advantageous social structure and lifestyle.

Are these zombies going to lead the fight back? And even if by some miracle they did, would they not be vilified, shouted down, ridiculed (cf. Enoch Powell) fired from their jobs? Don’t hold your breath.

I don’t have to belabour the point for readers here that whole areas of the west have been utterly transformed from being almost totally white, peaceful, wealthy and tolerant into dystopian Third World hell-holes…. in an incredibly short time.

Detroit, Trelleborg, inner London, outer Paris… I could go on for ever. Point is, whites allowed this to happen. And it shows no signs of stopping. If anything, the PC multi-culti insanity gets stronger by the day.

Add in demographics. White birth rates have plummeted, while the rates for immigrant populations soar. Such demographics show whole cities, and possibly even countries, becoming minority-white within a couple of generations. What happens then? The colonisers will have ‘legitimate’ democratic power. And we know the rest.

The only thing that might do the trick is a truly massive and prolonged economic downturn. Harsh medicine I know, but I do hope it happens. It would of course affect my Savantettes as much as anyone else, but I’d choose it – without hesitation – before the continued destruction of our societies.

Now, any optimists still out there? >>continue to commentary…

ALSO READ:

Rising New Tribe?

A White Racial Crisis

So, This Is England 2009

Is Burlington TOO White?

White People Are Hypocrites

Canadian Generosity Vs Stupidity

Brainwashing University Students

Foreign Seniors Displacing Canadians

Related Articles