Monthly Archives: October 2010

Police Surrender To Diversity

By Henry Makow Ph.D.

“Diversity” is an Admission of Cultural DEFEAT

Const. Gurvinder Singh Chakal: 'proud of myself'
(Photo by D. Lipnowski / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)

You’d be forgiven if you thought 35 yr. old Gurvinder Singh Chal, [above photo], belonged to the Punjabi Police Force.

In fact… he’s the latest recruit to [Canada's] Winnipeg Police Service.

He wears the turban “for cultural and religious reasons” and, with the blessing of Chief Keith McCaskill, it’ll be part of his standard uniform. It’s a “symbol of Diversity.”

The former 7-Eleven clerk has been in the country for just three [3!] years, but his cultural needs trump (supersedes) those of the 136-year-old Winnipeg Police Service. Apparently the WPS has no cultural tradition worth preserving; its uniform has no significance, whatsoever!

The move isn’t uncommon in Canada, with Sikh officers in cities such as Ottawa and Vancouver wearing turbans. We have no cultural identity in Canada. Perhaps this is the reason.

I hope the Filipinos, Somalis and aboriginals who make up Winnipeg’s rich cultural mosaic will also be able to modify their uniform.

ISN’T DIVERSITY GREAT?

[Related Articles:

Affirmative-Action Police

"Embracing" Racial Diversity

White Males Need Not Apply]

I expect that if I were 35 [yrs. old] again, and joined the Punjab [India] police, they’d let me blow off the turban and wear a Jewish skullcap or Mountie hat.

I’m sure I could take Saturdays or Sundays off to celebrate my religion. To help me remember my homeland, they’d allow a Beaver Insignia and Tim Horton’s logo on my uniform. That’s multiculturalism!

And, I expect that if 20 million people of European Christian extraction moved to the Punjab, they’d move heaven and earth to ensure we got our proportionate share of good jobs.

I know Punjabis value “Diversity” as much as we do.

[This is where I insert my Disclaimer: I like racial minorities. I like their restaurants and cooking. They have strong family values and this is more important now than ever. I was married to a Filipina for two years. I am not a racist in the negative sense. I'm all for people being treated fairly. That means hiring on the basis of qualifications and ability -- NOT quotas for color and gender.]

EUROPEAN CHRISTIAN DUNCES

This article is just to marvel at the stupidity of the fast-shrinking European majority, and the perfidy of the traitors who pass as their “leaders.”

I am all for having racial minorities, but it should be obvious that “diversity” is a ruse. Europeans are being sweet talked out of their national birthright. They’re fast becoming the next minority in Europe and North America, and with all the guilt trips, I’m not sure they’ll be treated with the same “tolerance.”

Apparently Jews can have a country where they are the majority and set the cultural standard. So can Indians, Arabs, Africans, Japanese and Chinese.

But Europeans cannot.

Europeans have a sense of political and economic entitlement, and represent the last potential resistance to Illuminati control. They have vestiges of Christianity, the thing the Illuminati hate more than anything. According to Christianity, man has a Divine soul; they obey God and thereby become more God-like. The Illuminati see people as animals trained to obey them.

Many “minorities” and women are beholden to the Illuminati who put them in power. They are their trained seals.

Was “Multiculturalism” or “Diversity” ever major election issues? No!  They were never debated. They entered the world in the form of “political correctness.” To question them exposed you to charges of bad taste and racism.

Multiculturalism and Diversity are social engineering programs introduced by the Illuminati (Masonic Jewish) central bankers. They are designed to change the European and Christian character of Europe and North America. They prevent us from maintaining and celebrating our cultural identity and traditions. Take school prayer, for example.

Similarly, feminism was an excuse to undermine marriage, heterosexuality and males in general. The school prom, virginity and even courtship went the way of the dodo. Marriage and birthrates plummeted.

Europeans have been sweet talked out of their national birthright. Our politicians work for the corporations or unions which are all controlled by the central bankers. They’re not our leaders. They’re our managers at best.

Police Chief McCaskill, and all the other clarions of “Diversity”, are of the same ilk.

[What’s the percentage (%) of WHITE people on Earth? Answer.]

So I’d like to suggest a traditional head covering for the future European minority. It’s the Dunce’s Cap. It’s for people who don’t appreciate their blessings and don’t protect them.  It’s for people who don’t have the smarts to perpetuate themselves, their values and traditions, and as a consequence become extinct.

And if you’re feeling resentful, don’t blame the minorities.  Let’s blame ourselves and our so-called leaders — the politicians, pastors, academics and pundits who sold us out for a profit to the Illuminati bankers and their satanic  New World Order.
–Source–

ALSO READ:

Affirmative-Action Police

Affirmative Action In Action

Sikh Men Seek Nannie Jobs

WHITE Males Need Not Apply

Racial DIVERSITY – But WHY?

Police Professionals In Retreat

Ethical Change In Law Enforcement

“A Racial Program for the 20th Century”

No Punjabi, No Job For Canadian Nurse!


….also

Hire Canadians First!

Labour Shortage MYTH

CANADIAN Border Madness

Immigration Reduces Income

One Proud European Nation


Note: Audio ceases during the last 30 seconds at 4:28, but feel free to play it over again… and again!

….and here’s another video clip with different performers below.

…the videos’ origin?  It’s Estonia.

Unlike many other parts of Europe, this white homogeneous country appears to have prevented the onslaught of 3rd world multi-racialism from taking root in their sovereign nation. Japan is another nation that has no interest in “multiculturalism”.

Amounting to only 8% of the world’s population, minority White people are becoming a rare breed amongst the “other” 92% who occupy this planet.

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_are_the_world’s_racial_demographics

Even Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany recently declared — that attempts to build a multicultural (multi-racial) society had “utterly failed“.

In another European nation, the British government deliberately set up plans to alter the makeup of their own white indigenous population, thus creating serious race-based problems that serve no one except the New World “Orderlies” in their sinister quest to divide and rule.

ALSO READ:

Racial “Diversity” Is A Con Game

Destroying European Civilisation

Multiculturalism – A Dividing Force

“A Racial Program for the 20th Century”

50,000,000 Africans INVITED To Europe

Multi-Culti Used To Destroy National Identity

 

Related articles

Chinese Dinner Bring-In Style

 

Second version of a Murray catchment map

Australia's Murray-Darling Catchment

 

The Voice

In this episode we take a look at the increasing amount of food from China that is appearing on our supermarket shelves. Most of it is coming in via the back door, New Zealand, where it is repackaged and sent off as being “New Zealand” produce.

The rest is labelled as being “made in Australia” from local and/or imported ingredients. We are never told where these imported ingredients come from, but with an increasing amount of toxic garbage from China being flooded into the country, it is safe to say that every meal you eat is Chinese.

The situation is only going to get worse, especially when you consider the much spruiked about water allocation cuts for farmers in the nation’s food basket that is the Murray-Darling Basin. This is going to force many farmers off the land while increasing food prices, even before Comrade Gillard’s (Australian Prime Minister) much hyped carbon tax is introduced and ensuring that even more of our food is Chinese.

If the labor/watermelon coalition government was so concerned about the environment they would cut immigration, and in fact, install measures to reduce Australia’s population. The fact is, that farmers are being forced to produce more, using fewer resources on land that is largely unsuitable for agriculture, as most of our prime farming land has become suburbia.

Australia’s secondary industry has all but been destroyed by the traitors in parliament adhering to the letter, the recommendations of the Lima Declaration, and now it appears that it is the turn of our primary producers to feel the pain of the New World Order Government.

In the not too distant future, when Australia has been stripped of its natural resources, we will be left with an empty husk that will be the property of China. The only ones to benefit from this are the supermarket duopoly of Coles and Woolworths, multinationals, and of course, our masters — the Chinese.

Will Australians ever wake up? -Source-

ALSO READ:

An Australian Integrity Test

Multiculturalism – A Dividing Force

Australia Panders To Foreign Invaders

Australia’s “Adventure” With Multi-Culti

Australia & Canada Have Limited Land Space


Entering “3rd-World” Britain

A radar tower at London Heathrow Airport

London's Heathrow Airport

Irish Savant

Well, you just got to hand it to Cardinal Walter Kasper.

As every schoolboy knows, this straight-talking German unhelpfully pointed out what must be blatantly obvious to everyone: that on landing in Heathrow (International airport) you feel you’re entering a Third-World country.

In fact, what surprises me is that anyone could seriously dispute this.  Heathrow has all the Third World ingredients: Almost all the staff are either Black or Brown, while the organisation and operations are chaotic.

The question might well be asked — as to why the predominance of South Asians amongst the staff? The answer is simple – that’s what South Asians do.

Indians, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis see it as their primary duty (well, secondary duty — first being scams and pilfering) to employ their own families and clans. A senior operations planner at that airport (white) told me it was shameless and blatant – they will always employ one of their own.

Against this kind of (racial) solidarity, white (Britons) are helpless.

And, so it has come to pass, where Third-World staff create typical Third-World pathologies in what should be an (entering) showpiece for Britain.

Meanwhile there are more than two million real British people on the dole (unemployed). -Source-

ALSO READ:

Vanishing England

One Million Brits Emigrate

Britain’s Immigration Fiasco

How Britain Destroyed Itself

The Great Escape From Britain

Adventures Among Anti-Racists

 

Poster outside of a restaurant in Guangzhou, China

Guangzhou, China (Restaurant Notice)

 

By Jonathan Kay
One of the nice things about writing an op-ed column for this newspaper [National Post] is that you get invited to speak on a lot of “media panels” at academic conferences. I flatter myself to think people are genuinely interested in what I have to say.
[...]
Which is to say, I’m used to being the odd man out.
But I’ve never felt quite so odd as I did last week at Combating Hatred, a day-long biennial anti-racism conference hosted by the University of Toronto for the benefit of the city’s lawyers, judges, police officers, educators and government workers.
[...]
By the time my turn was up, I’d thrown out my prepared speech in favour of a strenuous take-down of what I’d just heard. All of it, I said, was proof that radical anti-racism had become not only a cult of censorship, but a mental toxin as irrational and destructive as racism itself.

And since I was in the mood to make friends, I went further. I told the crowd that conferences like these were actually hurting minority communities by giving them a one-size-fits-all excuse to avoid confronting their problems.

Talk about gang culture, AWOL fathers, teen motherhood and shocking crime statistics in Black communities…… and “diversity consultants” will accuse you of racism.

Connect the dots between Canada’s radicalized mosques and the terror threat……and you get accused of Islamophobia.

Write about the economic dysfunction and social pathologies that fester on native reserves, and Donald Worme accuses you of penning a new Mein Kampf.

By this point, a few audience members were audibly sneering at the angry right-wing freak who, for reasons known only to himself, was ruining this otherwise respectable festival of white guilt.

[...]

In any case, I left the conference feeling more pity than anger. For all their claims to progressive politics, there is something slightly old-fashioned about the people who run these conferences. Many of them have been fighting the evil of racism since the early days. And they have chalked up some spectacular successes during that time: the anti-discrimination provisions in the Charter of Rights, human-rights tribunals in every province, hate-speech laws, gay marriage, etc. Even more importantly, they have managed to make race hatred the ultimate taboo – a subject that can get you fired from any job or ostracized at any social gathering.
[...]
As I sat there, I did indeed feel quite “privileged” – though not because of my race. It was because I am an opinion journalist who can write about these issues candidly. But the jurists, NGO (non-gov’t organizations) types, tenured academics and public servants staring back at me from the audience enjoyed no such freedom. Whether they believed the anti-racism orthodoxy or not, they inhabit politically correct professional milieus that require them to at least pretend to believe it.
For these people, anti-racism has become a sort of communist political re-education camp – one you can never leave. >Full Article
[...]
ALSO READ:






Black Culture Retarding White Kids

tony_sean_97_LA_CA

By John Tyndall

INCREASING ALARM is being expressed by both government and educationalists over the failure of so many boys at school to match the standards of girl pupils. Now, one of the latter has come forward with an admission that has alarmed the educational establishment and sent legions of the politically-correct into a fury.

Tony Sewell, a lecturer in education, has said that the influence of Black culture on many young people in Britain is having a positively retarding influence on their educational development affecting both sexes…. but boys, more than girls.

And the point that has got “under the skin” of the establishment the most, is the fact that Mr Sewell himself is Black!

Tony Sewell


Speaking to the Daily Telegraph last month, Sewell said that large sections of his [black] community were not interested in intellectual activity and that fashionable youth culture, with its interest in money and consumer goods, was much more damaging to black pupils’ chances than racism. He said that black peer grouping and culture was propping up the sale of trainers and rap music.

But that was not all. Sewell warned that all this was crossing over to white teenagers, who admired it. “Black culture has become the dominant culture,” he said, “and now it affects everyone.” According to the black cultural norm, he said, “to be good at school is seen as nerdy and white…. while it’s cool to be black.”

Being “Cool”

On the theme of “coolness”, Telegraph reporter Nicole Martin, in a study of Sewell’s findings, spoke of the influence of rap music on both black and white teenagers, mentioning such performers as Sean “Puff Daddy” Combs and Tupac Shakur, saying:-

‘Their obscene lyrics, glorifying tales of casual rape and murder, have made them cult figures among disaffected black teenagers who aspire to the wealth, fame and glamour their rap idols appear to have achieved with little or no effort.’

Miss Martin went on to say that:-

‘Educationalists have warned that the wealth and glamour of the rap scene have become so infectious that many white teenagers also share the aspirations of their black contemporaries.’

These findings simply confirm what Spearhead has been saying for a long time. Black culture is totally inimical to the mental and spiritual development of young white people, encouraging laziness, lack of ambition in worthy pursuits, preoccupation with the trivial and the banal, appalling manners and absence of respect for others. Mr Sewell is to be praised for pointing this out. -Source-


Black American saying what White people are afraid to say.

 

 

ALSO READ:

Blacks Less Intelligent?

White People Are Hypocrites

A Sense of Belonging

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group Differences Are Real

 

 

 

 

Controversial IQ Differences

How Britain Destroyed Itself

Importing Jamaican “Culture”

Scientific DNA Racial Profiling

45 Declared COMMUNIST Goals

British Schools Brainwashing Children

Related Articles

Two Countries Not “Up For Grabs”

The Centre Block on Parliament Hill, containin...

Canadian Parliament, OTTAWA

AUSTRALIA – Population 22 Million

CANADA – Population 34 Million

“Up for grabs” — an English idiom meaning something tossed up in the air for anyone to freely grab for themselves.

Don Murray
Immigration Watch Canada

This bulletin features an OP ED from Australia. The author is Australian environmentalist Jenny Goldie who is a member of Sustainable Population Australia.  http://www.population.org.au/

Ms. Goldie uses the term “Big Australia” to refer to an Australia with a much larger population. We use the term “Big Canada” in the same way.

The points the author makes are extremely relevant to statements made in Canada.

For example, Canadians have recently heard a University of Toronto academic advocate that Canada increase its population to 100 million.

Less audible was a statement made by a Tamil who was protesting the detention of the 490 Tamils that arrived here by ship in August. In an attempt to trivialize the effect of those Tamils on Canada, and to promote the acceptance of even more boat people as well as of more immigration to Canada, he declared that Canada’s large amount of land should be able to take 500 million people.

Similarly, former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd had advocated that Australia increase its population to 35 million by 2050 from its current population of 22 million. It is generally believed that Rudd’s “Big Australia” policy (as well as others) caused him to lose the leadership of Australia’s Labor Party to the current Prime Minister Julia Gillard.

All of these statements are particularly important today for the following reasons :

1. The advocates of larger populations completely ignore the environmental consequences of adding large numbers of people to either country. As the Australian writer says, “Space is one resource but it is by no means the only resource necessary for supporting a larger human population.” In particular, higher population advocates pay no attention to the possibility that both Canada and Australia may be severely affected by climate change. Although both countries are food exporters now, it is possible that they may not in the future be able to feed their own people. In the event that climate change does not have as negative effect as that, they pay no attention to the fact that huge amounts of Canada’s Class 1 farmland in Southern Ontario have been lost just since 1990 to housing subdivisions that were built to accommodate the 2.5 million immigrants who have settled there (as a result of senseless high immigration).

As Canada’s non-partisan Privy Council stated in 1991, a number of areas on this planet are already “environmental disasters“. The question that should be asked is this :

Do Canada and Australia have an obligation to accept unlimited numbers of people from those areas and also turn themselves into “environmental disasters”? It is clear that if high immigration continues, this will happen.

What good will this do for Canada and the rest of the world, other than to inflate the egos of the great “humanitarians” who see no limits to their “generosity” just as they see no environmental limits to Canada?

As we have said before, they and all Canadians should remember that in 1976, Canada’s most eminent scientists (The Science Council of Canada) advised Canada’s federal government that if Canada really wanted to be “humanitarian”, it should restrict immigration, protect its agricultural land, stabilize its population and concentrate on a future in which it did all it could to supply whatever excess food it had to other parts of the world. These food exports could go a long way to help Canada with its balance of payments.

2. The advocates of large populations also ignore the economic consequences of increasing a country’s population. As long ago as the late 1980′s, Canada’s own Department of Health and Welfare stated that Canada’s resources were limited.

If Canada continued to increase its population, the share that each Canadian would have of the country’s economic pie would decline proportionately. A significant number of Canadians, including the academic in question, continue to believe that Canada is “a rich country“, that “Canada’s resources are unlimited“, and that the current high immigration intake of 250,000 per year has had and will have no negative economic effects on Canada. This attitude persists despite the clear evidence that most Canadians are not “rich”.

In fact, hundreds of thousands of Canadians have lost their livelihoods in the recent recession (and more in the previous 2 since 1990). All have been negatively affected by the failure of all 3 levels of government to demand that immigration be lowered to protect them from competition from unnecessary immigration.

Incredible as it may sound, Canadians continue to hear from all levels of government that the aspirations of recent immigrants for recognition of their credentials and Canada’s supposed “need” for diversity should be given priority over the interests of the people already here.

In effect, all 3 levels of government have abandoned any sympathy for economically-distressed mainstream Canadians and transferred that sympathy to about 5 million immigrants, most of whom Canada never needed. Even harder to believe is that many people at all 3 levels of government seriously believe they should be given awards for having done this.

3. The advocates of higher populations in both countries also ignore that a “Big Canada” and a “Big Australia”, but particularly a “Big Canada” , will be achieved largely by immigration. The cultural effects of unnecessary high immigration are already evident in Canada’s larger centres.

Many Canadians feel like Tibetans!

When, they ask, did Canada’s elected officials ever ask Canadians if they wanted to be culturally overwhelmed? To turn this situation around for the benefit of those who cannot understand this message, how would China, India or the Philippines, who now send Canada most of its immigrants, have reacted if large numbers of mainstream Canadians arrived on their doorsteps and proclaimed, “We’ve come to make you diverse !!”

Undoubtedly, all these countries would have been enraged and thrown these people out !! Yet, here in Canada, most elected officials at all 3 levels of government have grovelled and fawned and told their mainstream Canadian electorate to “Celebrate Diversity”, “Recognize credentials” (of people Canada did not need), and “Repent” for so-called past wrongs by delivering the most sycophantic of apologies (See the one delivered in New Westminster, B.C. recently) and by continuing to take people who are culturally overwhelming Canada. And, hard as it is to believe, many of Canada’s elected officials at all 3 levels have managed to get away with this nonsense for 20 years.

Many Canadians would say that these people are long overdue to receive their “just award”.  –Source–

ALSO READ:

To “Flight” or Not

Canada Is NOT For Sale

Declining Western Nations

“Right” Thinking In Germany

Our Tragic Immigration System

Gang Rapists Are Majority NON-White

A Racial Program For The 20th Century

50,000,000 Africans INVITED To Europe

Related Articles

“Racist, Racist”

Anti-racist rally in Sydney 2005 Dec 18

Rally in Sydney, Australia

By Vanishing American

[...]

Do a search on the phrase ‘liberals real racists’ and you will get many, many hits. Too many to read through, as I found when I searched on that phrase.

It is pretty obvious to me that the phrase was cooked up by some Republican ‘wit’ who had just been called the r-word (racist, not Republican) by some liberal/multicultist. It amounts to the schoolyard retort, ”I know you are, but what am I?” It is just about as intelligent.

The end result of this accusation being flung at lefties and diversity cultists is that now we have twice as many White folks calling each other ”racist!” back and forth, endlessly. Way to go.

It surely must amuse the diversities (NON-whites) that Whites are now calling each other their favorite term of abuse. Now they can take some time off, and let us call each other the ‘r-word’ while they sit back and watch and laugh.

We are doing their job for them. They don’t need to race-bait anymore; we are doing it to each other.

I decided some years ago that I won’t use the word ‘racist’ or ‘racism’ except in an ironic sense. I won’t write it here without scare quotes. So you won’t find me joining in the counter-accusations against our lefty/multicultist foes. I can think of many other names, mostly unflattering, that fit them, but I can think of no good reason to join in the race-baiting.

First, I think it serves no useful purpose. Do the people who employ that tactic think it will shock some leftist or politically correct brainwash-ee into an epiphany? Do we think it will shame them into admitting that they harbor racist thoughts?

If a leftist were brutally honest with himself, he would admit that by claiming that Whites are congenitally bigoted against nonwhites, then he himself must be just as guilty as the Republicans (Conservatives) whom he loathes. White privilege makes us all guilty, according to the leftists and nonwhites. So by that line of thought, liberals and ‘conservatives’ are equally guilty of the ‘White original sin.’

But are liberals or progressives ‘racists’… as most people understand that word? If their definition is true, if ‘racist’ means anybody who 1) notices race and/or 2) believes the races differ in some intrinsic way, then what do we call the liberals who see the races as different in ways that flatter nonwhites, and who believe that all the problems of nonwhites, being caused by Whites, must be rectified by Whites?

[...]

Paternalism can be interpreted as meaning that nonwhites are incapable of taking care of themselves, or even of defending themselves verbally.

For example, liberals will jump to the defense of nonwhites when they sniff out any hint of ‘bigotry’ from a fellow White. They will argue in the name of the nonwhite as if that nonwhite cannot defend himself. I suppose this is their rather deluded idea of chivalry – which in its true form calls for defending the weak and the lame and the halt. But I think it bizarre that they haven’t noticed that nonwhites can and do defend themselves loudly, vociferously, and stridently. Why White liberals imagine that they need to act as lawyers for their favorite victim groups, (mascots, as Thomas Sowell put it) is beyond me.

The liberals’ client groups are certainly able to speak up for themselves; they are not weak at all in that sense. And they have the media 110 percent on their side; the media, being made up of leftists of one stripe or another, does little but defend the perceived downtrodden victim groups. It is a leftist fallacy that ‘minorities’ are ‘under-served populations’ or that their ‘voices are excluded from the public discourse.’ That notion is laugh-out-loud funny.

But does paternalism imply a sense of superiority, or a dominant/subservient relationship between the person helping and those being helped? I don’t think so. I think that most leftists have convinced themselves that they are the possessors of something called ‘White privilege‘ which makes them the beneficiaries of many un-earned benefits. They think these benefits are taken directly from nonwhites and given, unjustly, to us. So they think they are righting a wrong.

If they want to be self-abasing altruists who are willing to serve others at their own expense, that’s their choice — but where it goes badly wrong is when they enshrine that altruism in public policy, making it the law of the land. And where it goes really, really wrong is when they force the rest of us, essentially, to participate in this racial self-abasement and penance.

You cannot coerce people into loving their neighbor, or even liking their neighbor. >Read full article HERE.

ALSO READ:

“You’re a Racist!”

“Racism” Is Not Sinful

“Institutional Racism” In Britain

Racism – The New Witchcraft Hysteria

Sweden Democrats Party

Richard B. Spencer

Every few election cycles, the mainstream media fulminate over the rise of dangerous “extremists” on the European continent. 

Newsweek’s distress over the Swedish Democrats’ impressive electoral showing this past month is in the tradition of similar hand-wringing over Jörg Haider (Austria), Jean-Marie Le Pen (France), Geert Wilders (The Netherlands), Nick Griffin (Britain) and many others.

The reality is that not only are leftists and milquetoast conservatives still in power all over Europe but the now infamous Swedish Democrats are hardly as fascist as they’re made out to be. They seek to guard Sweden’s social welfare state… not destroy it.

The SD is threatening to the European Establishment, however, in that the party confronts it with some inconvenient truths and lays bare the contradictions within the ruling elites’ current ideology. The SD gained notoriety by producing an ad that was banned by Sweden’s TV4, ostensibly because it violated national laws against “inciting racial hatred.”

In fact, the ad points out the obvious: the mass immigration of third-world Muslims — who are, on the whole, tax eaters, not tax payers — threatens the pensions of indigenous Swedes. It’s impossible to deny.

Whatever one might think of European Social Democracy — I myself believe Europeans would be better off without it — it’s irrefutable that such a system is functional only when it serves a homogenous, European people — one with a shared heritage and social values and expectations.

As Milton Friedman observed, you can have a social welfare state or you can have mass immigration, but you can’t have both. And the influx of aliens transforms whatever “solidarity” might have existed in social democratic society into a battler of group against group.

And mass Muslim immigration isn’t solely an economic threat. Over the past years, Muslims living in the town of Malmo have harassed Jewish residents and forced them from their homes. The Swedish Democrats were the only party to describe the situation as it was and publicly defend Malmo’s Jews. And yet, shortly after [September's] election, the president of the Official Council of Jewish Communities in Sweden announced that the SD was “anti-Semitic” and even “neo-Nazi.”

It appears that once a party gets labeled “the far Right,” no good deed goes unpunished. -Source-

Check out: Cavatus’s Blog (Sweden)

ALSO READ:

Muslims In Stockholm

SWEDEN Tops In Rapes

Muslim Violence In Canada

Swedish Reporters Muzzled

Free Thinking Under Attack

Swedish Media Soft On Immigrants

Sweden’s Ordered Society In Trouble


Related Articles