You can either listen to the truth and start thinking and acting in the best interests of your people; or you can suffer the horrible consequences of continuing along your present reality-denying and suicidal pathway to racial dispossession, death, and extinction.
But you can’t have it both ways – you can’t turn your back on the truth and expect to avoid the consequences.
[...]
So what, then, is the best way to learn how to live in a reality-based world after years and years of being lied to and otherwise misled by the media, your government, your schools and textbooks and teachers, your churches and clergy, and even your own parents?
What is the best way to embark on a personal program of awakening and enlightenment? Simply start by becoming knowledgeable about real history, natural truth, and the critical social/political issues. And try to approach the task with an open mind.
You can’t learn about these things from the mainstream media (MSM). But you can study them on the Internet by going to the links given on this website and then following up by exploring the dozens if not hundreds of additional websites listed on those sites (see their “blogrolls”). Be sure not to overlook the very enlightening essays of Dr. William Pierce (National Alliance), Mark Weber and associates (IHR), and Edgar Steele. A good starting place might be the National Alliance’s “Who Rules America?” And check out the videos produced by Dr. Duke.
[...]
Don’t worry – it’s fun – but do be prepared to encounter some very surprising truths you might never have expected. To help you get started, I have included the following list of just some of the key topics worth “googling” and investigating:
- Media control (TV, movies, newspapers, magazines, book publishing, music).
- Destructive influence on culture – music, art, entertainment media.
- Role in instigating 20th century political upheavals and wars, including their role in the initiation and advancement of communism and the killing of tens of millions of White people in the early days of the Soviet Union.
- Role in the Versailles treaty debacle following the First World War.
- Complicity in war crimes and “crimes against humanity” of Allies during and following WW II.
- Perpetration of the Jews’ (Holo-Hoax) following WW II, and their using it for political and economic extortion ever since.
- Jewish and Israeli national security crimes against America – repeated espionage, 1967 attack on U.S.S. Liberty, etc. etc.
- Role of Jewish “Neocons” in instigating recent wars in the Middle East.
- Role in predatory high-finance and banking, international banking, and central banking including the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank.
- Social destruction via anti-White thought-shaping and mind-bending in such areas as so-called “civil rights,” diversity, and multiculturalism; “normalization” and acceptance of homosexuality; and radical feminism.
- Involvement in modern-day organized crime, financial crimes, and White slavery.
- Involvement in promotion and distribution of pornography.
Negroes - Genetic differences (including shortcomings) such as low IQs, deficient social functioning, anti-social behavior, etc.
- Inability to create or maintain, or even to successfully participate in civilized societies.
- Criminality, especially highly disproportionate perpetration of interracial (in this case Black-on-White) crime.
- Ubiquitous and never-ending social dependency; welfarism.
- Degrading the White gene pool via miscegenation (race mixing).
Mestizos (including Mexicans, “Hispanics,” “Latinos,” other Latin American “breeds”)
- The real effects of quasi-legal and illegal mestizo immigration.
- Welfare costs, including the bankrupting of hospitals, municipalities, states, etc.
- Costs of their high crime rates, and especially their gangs and drug trafficking (policing, courts, incarceration).
- Social Security and voting scams.
- The overwhelming of, including literal “take-over” of; cities, towns, and entire areas.
- High birthrate coupled with anti-White “Reconquista” mentality.
- Costs to public education; damage to White children’s education.
- Costs of bilingualism and their alien culture.
Also worthy of your attention are the problems with other non-White “invasions” of our society by such groups as S.E. Asians, Muslims, Pacific Islanders, etc. Perhaps not as urgent or screamingly lethal but important nevertheless in their own unique ways, and should not be entirely overlooked.
I suppose what it comes down to is your honest answers to the questions: “do you want your own subspecies to survive and go on to greater things (as opposed to becoming dominated and economically enslaved by the colored masses and eventually being wiped out)?;”
“would you prefer that you and your children do not betray your genetic heritage, and all the struggles for racial survival on the part of your White ancestors down through the centuries?;”
“do you want your babies to look like you?;”
“would you prefer not to handicap your children with the lower IQs that inevitably result from racial mixing with non-Whites?;”
and, “do you want to live in a real “nation” (as defined by a country populated by people sharing physical attributes [genetics], history, heritage, and culture?)”
Well, we had something like that just 50 years ago, but we don’t any longer, to large extent; and if we don’t start doing something about it right now, we sure as hell won’t when your children come of age and when your grandchildren are born. [...] -continue to FULL REPORT-
I have no preference for any of the five main (political) parties.
All have one agenda — massive and unending immigration-driven population growth.
There is no candidate in my constituency worthy of my vote. But as Churchill said, “while there may not be anyone worth voting for, there is always someone worth voting against”.
And, if I cannot cast a vote against someone in another riding, I can always lend financial support to the candidate best positioned to defeat the worst candidate. Therefore I would send money to the following campaigns:
The (Liberal) candidate who has a chance to defeat the NDP Immigration critic, Olivia Chow.
The Conservative incumbent Gary Lunn, who has the best chance of defeating challenger Elizabeth May of the Green Party.
The Bloc candidate who has the best chance of defeating Liberal immigration critic Justin Trudeau. —and—
The Liberal candidate who has the best chance of unseating ethnic-ass-kisser Immigration, Citizenship and Multiculturalism Minister Jason Kenny.
I am an equal opportunity quisling-hater. All these open-borders champions — Chow, May, Trudeau and Kenny deserve to be turfed from the public trough and returned to the hole that they sprung from. A curse on them and all like them, in whatever party. We need MPs who will put Canadians first. -Source-
[Proportion of Visible Minorities for ALL of CANADA, 1981-2001 --Stats Canada]
[The2011Vis-Min numbers suggest16%-- and the 5,000,000+ (five million!)who've arrived only in the past20years, is largely the result of one of the greatest immigration deceptions ever perpetrated on Canada.]
Two puppet politicians give the same speech in two supposedly independent countries (Australia & Canada), prompting the question: Who is pulling their strings??
The following excerpts are taken from an open letter written to Prime Minister David Cameron of Great Britain concerning the crucial question of mass 3rd-world immigration and its negative effects on the indigenous British people and their homeland. However, this letter could have been addressed to any “leader” of a White western country, and yet, still maintained the integrity of the message. It’s recommended that you read the full letter HERE.
From Dr. Frank Ellis
Dear Mr Cameron:
Once again, I am compelled to write to you on the subject of immigration and the related ills which are gnawing away at the fabric of British society and destroying us. Having read your speech, I can say that there are parts which show some awareness of the immigration threat, for example, the connection with the welfare state. Whether of course you act is another matter.
The long-suffering, white indigenous population has heard the cry of “It’s time to get tough on immigration” so many times before, and on each occasion, nothing has happened. Once any election is out of the way the immigration assault on our way life continues its relentless path. Nothing is done to stop the invasion. Whole neighbourhoods are taken over by immigrants and we whites are supposed to pretend that we are being blessed, when in fact we are being dispossessed.
[...]
The reason that ‘immigration is a hugely emotive subject’ is because any attempt to criticize mass immigration has been portrayed by the political caste to which you belong, the BBC, the Guardian-reading classes, the universities, and what is erroneously referred to as the “teaching profession”, as something too dreadful even to contemplate.
The implicit, often quite explicit assumption, has been that any person who criticizes the level of immigration, or who resents the changes that have been imposed on Britain without the consent of the indigenous population, is some kind of Nazi, hell bent on mass murder. Those of us who have attacked the insane levels of immigration have not just made assertions: we have offered compelling arguments to which the BBC, to take just one example, has responded with hysteria and vitriol.
[...]
The filters of BBC censorship and of other monopoly stream media outlets through which anything to do with race, multiculturalism, immigration and crimes carried out by immigrants must pass before anything is broadcast or put in print mean that the grim truth is never fully placed in the public domain or only hinted at, as for example when the BBC reports violent black behaviour in London.
Strangely, Britons were rejecting multi-racialism as far back as1958, and still do today!!
Ever since 1948, immigration has been an issue in Britain, punctuated by race riots and culminating in the Islamic terrorist attacks of Thursday 7th July 2005. Successive governments have tried to ram race-is-a fiction, we-are-the-world and multiculturalism down our throats, and when we have retched and vomited this poison out of our bodies, politicians have then resorted to legal and administrative sanctions against us; they have indoctrinated our children to hate their country, its heroes, its past; they have turned children against their parents; they preach hatred of whites; they encourage immigrants to mock us and to take over our towns, cities and neighbourhoods; and our (soldiers) returning from Iraq and Afghanistan are spat at and reviled by immigrants as war criminals.
[...]
As for what you call ‘good immigration’ you claim – politicians always do – that ‘Our country has benefitted immeasurably from immigration’… That is news to me.
When I go through large parts of Britain – Bradford, Slough, Leicester, Birmingham, Leeds and whole swathes of London – I am assailed by sights and sounds that might be appropriate in the Third-World but do not belong in England. Third-World immigrants recreate theThird World in First-World countries.
When I go to large parts of England I do not wish to see masses of black and brown faces, bizarre clothing, hordes of immigrant children, freakish behaviour, to hear the invasive cacophony of non-European languages and to see whole streets that look as if they belong in Islamabad or Mogadishu. I do not feel enriched by “diversity” or multiculturalism.
[...]
The real problem is the mass influx of poorly or dubiously qualified or unqualified Indians, Pakistanis, sub-Saharan Africans, Somalis and Turks and others, whose sole contribution is to overpopulate Britain and whose customs, religion and high levels of welfare dependency represent a massive drain on the public purse.
When one takes into account the social, economic and displacement costs borne by the white indigenous population and the huge emotional and psychological stress inflicted on whites by the presence of large numbers of non-white aliens in their country, there are no substantial benefits at all from mass immigration, especially from India, Pakistan, Sub-Saharan Africa, Somalia and the Middle East. Mass, non-white immigration is a curse.
[...]
What are (staff) people from Uganda, India and Pakistan doing in large numbers in British hospitals? Britain is quite capable of providing enough staff from the indigenous population. Our training is superior as well. The countries you mention are not exactly known for high standards and good training.
The Indian examination system is corrupt and riddled with cheating such that fake degrees and other professional qualifications are easily obtainable at the right price. Pakistan is a Third World slum whose sole export to this country has been terrorism, welfare parasitism and immigrant invaders. Uganda is a sub-Saharan, third-world basket case. Do you really expect me to believe that any training such as it is in Uganda meets First World standards, and that lives are not being put at risk by employing Africans?
[...]
For how much longer are you and Trevor Phillips going to tell us that more time is needed so that integration can work, or should I say, be made to work, at the expense of the white, indigenous population? Integration can never work because most of us have a healthy and wholesome sense of who weare and what we cannot be or become. The natural resistance we manifest frustrates the ambition of the diversophiles, so harsh and repressive legislation must be enacted so that opposition can be bullied and intimidated into silence.
[...]
You want openness. Here it is: I do not want to live in a community where I am confronted with hordes of black and brown faces on the streets of our towns and cities; I do not want to socialise with non-white immigrants; if by mistake I walked into a pub full of non-whites, I would leave immediately; I do not want to have to work with these people if it can be avoided; I avoid non-white immigrants at every possible opportunity (if dealing with them is unavoidable, I am polite no more no less); I do not want my children to have to endure the presence of huge numbers of non-white immigrants in their schools; I do not want to be preached to by diversity propagandists, telling me against all the evidence and the screams of my soul that diversity is some kind of blessing (it is nothing of the sort).
Diversity is bestial, hateful and loathsome: it is a psychological weapon of war which has been deployed against the white peoples of the world in order to undermine their natural sense of racial and cultural separation, their identity, their natural and proper sense of superiority across the entire spectrum of human endeavour. Diversity is a collectivist (Culture Marxist) refuge for the failure, the loser, the envious and the nation hater-killers.
Trigger-Happy – Informal adjective . 1. ready to fire a gun at the least provocation, regardless of the situation or probable consequences.
The following (real life) video below captures the effect of how behavior patterns of some cops seem to be molded from watching T.V. cop dramas, or by playing animated x-box video games, and then transferring those mental images into events that kill real people. .
Imagine the following scene from your own personal perspective.
You’re a casual pedestrian crossing a street intersection on a bright, sunny afternoon, carrying a wooden board and pocket knife in your hand. You’re not harassing, nor threatening other pedestrians while walking towards your destination, nor are you carrying a blood-spattered body and a six-inch open blade dripping with blood that would draw undue suspicion. You’re simply carrying a pocket knife and piece of carving wood.
Just arriving to a stop at that same intersection, in a marked police cruiser, is a 27 yr. old man with two years service on the job who was probably bored with the monotony of an uneventful day. (Remember, script writers don’t include the boring moments of police work in their television dramas which often encapsulate an entire career’s excitementwithin a one hour-time frame.)
Walking past the windshield of rookie’s cruiser, you carry your pocket knife and wooden board used for whittling, a practice often accustomed to Native Indians. You’ve created no overt provocation to arouse suspicion. In fact, you’re hardly aware of your surroundings, other than safely crossing the street intersection.
But Mr. hero cop has other plans for you. He immediately enacts his fantasy role as “gallant protector of the people” because he’s feeling rather bored and needs a little excitement “to make his day”.
Lasting only a few seconds, a dangerous mix of actions is about to ensue. Acting on adolescent impulse that lacks any common sense, plus a craving need to validate his “hero” self-image, rookie begins initiating a highly provocative procedure for such a benign incident.
Upon exiting the police vehicle, rookie swaggers towards the sidewalk while withdrawing his holstered gun. To alert your attention to turn around and face him, rookie yells out “HEY, HEY, HEY”,….. then continues with “PUT THE KNIFE DOWN, PUT THE KNIFE DOWN, PUT THE KNIFE DOWN”.
Having mere seconds to respond, your befuddled mind is trying to make sense of what is happening. You’re trying to process this threatening and hostile appearance that suddenly erupted from behind you.
Onlyfive (5) seconds (the time to read this top line) will elapse from the time the shooter first yells “PUT THE KNIFE DOWN” to the time he fires his first bullet into your body, followed by 4 more bullets in rapid succession.
You’ve now fallen on your back, mortally wounded after five bullets have violently torn into your flesh. Your blood begins painting the sidewalk as it oozes out of bullet holes and into the small cement crevices lying under your moribund body. Your final moments of life are consumed with thoughts of family and friends. A poignant moment of reflection is reserved for your last few seconds – “If I’d only crossed at another intersection”!
This unprovoked shooting actually happened on a Seattle, Washington street on August 30, 2010 and was instigated by this man, Ian Birk.
Ian Birk
Ian Birk reportedly resigned less than six months later in February, 2011 …..but, was probably forced to quit, or be fired from his job.
Although the shooting death was ruled not justified by the Seattle Police Department’s Firearms Review Board — incredibly — Ian Birk, will not be facing murder charges.
Watch the following video and listen to the casual tone in the shooter’s voice, as if reporting a simple fender-bender between two cars. A normal human being would act with some emotion after mortally wounding another human being with 5 bullets! One bullet will disable most men, but five bullets fired in rapid succession is a deliberate intent to kill.
A closedpocket-knife was later found near the dead man’s body during the investigation. So the question is….. where was the alleged threat that justified this shooting?? Answer: There was no threat!
The victim wearing light clothing and seen mounting the sidewalk curb is about to die. (The actual shooting is not seen, but the audio is heard)
[Before reading the essay below,ask yourself this question. What is the percentage (%) of WHITE people on Earth? Answer.]
Christian Miller
WHITE IDENTITY POLITICS is a form of heresy….. and heresy has grave consequences.
Advocating White nationalism, or just merely defending White interests, often results in a loss of social standing. Moral cowards, amoral sycophants, and racial traitors are rewarded, while heroes and righteous guardians are demonized. Pretending that Whites are social constructs, or have no legitimate interests to defend, is accepted, and even celebrated in a society infested with anti-White multiculturalism.
White racialists realize that the cornucopia of cultures is designed to exclude any White culture, and the future rainbow of races is actually a muddled mess of miscegenation. It is a tremendous challenge to remain in steadfast support of the White extended genotype. The anti-White opposition is well-funded, well-organized, malicious, and persistent.
White advocacy is beset on all sides. Campaigning against White genocide attracts derision and scorn from anti-Whites. Lamenting the decline of the White population into minority status is attacked as intolerance. Merely calling attention to, let alone denouncing, the maliciously disproportionate amounts of violent inter-racial crime committed against White people is paradoxically described as “hate”.
Protecting the continuity of family lineage by expecting exclusively White marriages and White procreation is seen as backwards, provincial, or outdated. Suggesting that many trends or ideas that harm White interests have been disproportionately created, organized, disseminated, or financed by Jewish interests, can lead to accusations of insanity or mental instability.
This derision, scorn, and accusations of intolerance, hate, and insanity are reactions that require White nationalists to have a thick skin in order to maintain their viewpoints. It is hard to be a heretic. But the requisite resilience to carry forward is about more than insensitivity to insults or threats. It is inspired by the love of truth. White racialists know that race is real and that it has important consequences for civilization and ethnic genetic interests.
White nationalists realize they are being systematically dispossessed and ethnically cleansed from their homelands. Defenders of White identity understand that there is nothing hateful or unhealthy about wanting to continue their heritage by having White babies in White societies.
The steely resolution that guides a White nationalist is a personality trait, or perhaps a spiritual constitution that values eternal truth more than ephemeral social standing (or indoctrination). A patriotic White man understands that truth can be directly opposed to popular opinion, and that such a situation is not without historical precedent. An exemplary White man is willing to act in accordance with that wisdom. A heroic White man can marshal these convictions into effective action and change the dynamics of society. The White race is in desperate need of more heroes.
White people are known to be more individualistic than other races. In a White-dominant society, free from ethnic or racial competition from non-White groups, this individualism helped propel White people beyond the established limits of science, technology, philosophy, and religion.
The individualist refusal to conform to the “popular consensus”—which always opposes scientific breakthroughs or heretical ideas—is precisely why so many White historical figures persist within the collective memory as titans of Western civilization. Nobody remembers a conformist, but everybody remembers a successful catalyst of righteous revolution. The reward for success in such a struggle is immortal fame. How could it be any other way?
Why would anyone remember Galileo Galilee if he were not individualistic and self-assured enough to confront the ruling dogma of a geocentric universe? Whose bookshelf would carry the works of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn if he decided to bow his head to Soviet oppression because speaking out was not worth going to the gulag? Who could call themselves Protestant if Martin Luther lacked the courage and conviction to stand before the Catholic Church and criticize it without fear?
All of these White men had radical ideas that stood directly against the ruling orthodoxies of their societies. These men would be scattered to the winds of time had they not found everlasting fame by tenaciously promoting important ideas despite intense societal opposition. These were all rebels with a cause, and that cause was truth. Truth is heresy before it is accepted as truth, so these men were once called heretics.
White nationalists face similar pressures because being pro-White is heresy in modern America. Professors will express hostility to ideas about White interests, and this may translate to lowered grades or a denial of tenure in the academic world. Employers often terminate (or exclude) workers who openly defend the civil rights of Whites in their private lives. Former friends may cut ties when they sense the imminent risks to social standing that follow from associating with a racially conscious White person. Sometimes even immediate family members will choose material security and peer-group acceptance, and not support a relative who is protecting the entire extended family. Heresy has social consequences, as Galileo, Solzhenitsyn, and Luther knew all too well.
“Racist!” is the modern equivalent of “heretic!”
Words like ‘intolerance’ and ‘hate’ are used as shibboleths to shout down dissension and preclude debate. The words have changed, but the methods of social ostracism remain the same. Cry “heretic!” – or its equivalent, and let the crowd take care of the rest.
History is replete with examples of entrenched orthodoxy stultifying new ways of thinking in an oppressive manner. In more primitive times, the mystical shamans or oracles consulted with the gods in order to divine wisdom for tribal consumption. To deny the oracle’s wisdom, or to suggest the shaman was merely influenced by psychotropic drugs, was grounds for ostracism from the tribe. Only a heretic would oppose the dominant spiritual class because it was social suicide.
Skip ahead a few thousand years. Oracles and shamans became priests. The mystical priests consulted with God and the Bible in order to divine wisdom for public consumption. To deny the priests’ monopoly on the word of God, or to suggest they were power-hungry sycophants, was grounds for excommunication from the Church and society—a lesson Martin Luther learned the hard way. The charge of heresy was used to prevent reasonable debate, just as racism or anti-Semite is used today.
The modern ruling orthodoxy follows political correctness—the anti-White bastard child of Cultural Marxism. Nietzsche declared the death of God, but nature abhors a vacuum. In His place, the elite cabals in academia, finance, media, and politics erected a new totem pole to worship and venerate. Whether it is called liberalism, egalitarianism, Cultural Marxism, multiculturalism, or diversity, the dynamics of enforcing this untenable, genocidal, and anti-White worldview remain the same: ridicule, isolation, defamation, prosecution, ostracism, or humiliation— but never open debate.Heresy is not to be debated.
While most of humanity has evolved beyond burning heretics at the stake, or performing ritual human sacrifice, the same procedural thought control remains, consistently corrupting and subverting impressionable White minds. Anyone who denies the existence of ritual sacrifice is not looking closely enough. If an influential figure violates the dogma of multiculturalism, the gatekeepers will quickly close ranks.
Instead of the ominous tribal drumbeat, the background music will be cries of “racist!” or “hater!” or “anti-Semite!” as the eager executioners prepare the sacrificial altar. Instead of carving out the heretic’s heart, the mainstream media, and its supporters, will try to ruin the heretic’s reputation as he is defamed as an intolerant, hateful, and bigoted person.
Public persecution of heretics persists in the modern age. Remember that the public sacrifice is also a warning. It is a powerful message to the rest of the group: heresy has serious consequences.
Unfortunately, the heretical path of White nationalism, White identity, and White interests is a narrow one. The trailblazers of the movement must deal with the prickly thorns, rough terrain, and back-breaking labor needed to clear the brush so others may be enticed to follow. At this stage, it is inevitable that some people will sever social connections with a pro-White person once the nationalist motivations are made clear.
It seems strange that these same people would gladly continue the friendship, or express glowing admiration, if the cause at issue concerned the rights of any other racial group except for White people. This promiscuous out-group altruism is at the height of absurdity when an ostensibly White person rejects the company of another White person who advances both of their shared interests.
But this is the reality of anti-White multiculturalism. The perverted ideas that have poisoned American discourse are designed to marginalize, ostracize, and demonize any remaining White person who dares to stand against the rolling tide of White dispossession.
What keeps a White nationalist from throwing in the towel? Why trudge on, when the road ahead is uphill and laden with obstacles at every turn? Beyond an undying love for one’s people, it is the same determination that drove Henry Ford to publicize Jewish subversion in the Dearborn Independent, despite the imminent threat it posed to his financial interests. It is the same zeal for truth and liberty that compelled Thomas Jefferson to pen the Declaration of Independence.
The same love for truth burns in the heart of every White nationalist, and no amount of social pressure, slander, or temporary isolation is enough to extinguish the flame. The fuel source is the righteous indignation that arises when one man recognizes a cosmic injustice and is willing to fight through Hell to rectify it. The temptation of capitulation is great, the course of retreat is enticing, and the punishment for having the gall to continue is severe, but the footprints of so many great men of the past are enough to inspire forward progress.
A spiritual man values virtue, infinitely more so, than material comfort or fleeting adoration from those not worthy to provide it. Patrick Henry confirmed his status as a spiritual man when he thundered his revolutionary call-to-arms to the Virginia House of Burgesses: “give me Liberty or give me Death!”
The movement for White identity and White interests needs more spiritual men. This is not intended to be a criticism of capitalism, profits, or material success. White nationalism needs donors, financiers, talented businessmen, and creative capitalists. But it is an inescapable conclusion that defending White people is not a get-rich-quick scheme, and it is not guaranteed to win more friends than enemies in the short term.
Arthur Schopenhauer said “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Finally, it is accepted as being self-evident.” White identity politics is somewhere between ridicule and violent opposition. The goal is to move towards Schopenhauer’s third stage. It will not be easy.
White nationalism is not for the weak, the timid, the gullible, or the emotionally dependent, and instead, these attributes describe the demoralized and deracinated White person. The strong have always helped the weak; right now, the White race is in a position of weakness. Those who have not fallen under the spell of White guilt must reawaken their White brothers and sisters. Those who have looked beyond the horizon and gazed upon the possibility of White extinction must warn the unenlightened about the reality of White genocide. Those who value truth and who retain a healthy sense of White pride and White identity must shoulder the burden for the rest of the group who have been robbed of their heritage.
Leadership, integrity, persuasive ability, organizational skills, and inspirational ideas are sorely needed in the White nationalist movement. The genetic capacity to express these skills and traits has not been lost—yet. The potential remains within the White genotype, whether expressed or dormant, waiting to be expressed in the next familial iteration. Preserve that potential as an irreplaceable treasure.
Remember that the spirit of conquest, scientific discovery, opposition to tyranny, bravery in the face of adversity, and most importantly, un-shakeable determination in the pursuit of truth are all fundamental aspects of White genetic and historical heritage. The same individualism that has been cruelly exploited to disenfranchise Whites in the midst of hostile minorities can be redirected to fight against the injustice of White dispossession.
The inherently White characteristic of Western individualism can be rescued from its current subversion and redirected towards the improvement of White society. There was a time, not so long ago, when protecting the White race, the White nation, the White village, or the White family was a heroic and virtuous act to be celebrated, and not a reason to be called a “racist.” This spirit of brotherhood, kin, and race has not been completely extinguished from the White population.
The task ahead is to awaken the yearning for truth, focused determination, sense of justice, ethnic identity, and iron will that resides within the White race. Part of the struggle is to destroy taboos, and transform heresy to accepted truth. When that day comes, the titans will stand up, yawn, and throw off the shackles of anti-White multiculturalism with an effortless shrug of the shoulders. Charges of heresy will be ignored and fade away.
Unencumbered and emancipated, the White race will continue its eternal march throughout history, breaking philosophical barriers, reaching higher plateaus of health and virility, discovering profound scientific truths, inventing exciting new technologies, and achieving a greater zenith of civilization. Who will lead the charge? -Source-
Suppressing free and open discussion on any subject is as wrong as telling lies. But knowingly suppressing the truth is the biggest lie of all, because it is based, not on a mistake or a genuine error, but on a deliberate intention to deceive.
Having been tortured, Rudolf Höss, who was the commander of Auschwitz concentration camp from 1940 to 1943, almost certainly lied to save the lives of his wife and children.
Even if torture and duress cannot not be proven, the overwhelming reason for recognizing the utter falsity of the Höss “confession”, is that the gassing method he described was not scientifically plausible.
Yet Höss’s conviction has stood, by inference, as a testament to the cruelty of Germans in general, since he was tried at Nuremberg in 1946-1947, and subsequently hanged in Poland on April 16th, 1947.
With great respect for those who have tried — though harassed, punished, fined, imprisoned and otherwise abused — to tell it like it really was:Arthur R. Butz, Robert Faurisson, Paul Grubach, Gerd Honsik, David Irving, Kevin Käther, Nicholas Kollerstrom, Fred Leuchter, Horst Mahler, Ingrid Rimland, Germar Rudolf, Bradley Smith, Sylvia Stolz, Fredrick Töbin, Ernst Zündel and many others.
If you read any number of reactionary/hard-conservative blogs and websites, it is readily apparent that I’m not saying anything new. It’s all run-of-the-mill stuff that you might read on Vdare. What makes this blog unique and valuable, in my opinion, is that these opinions are being applied to the Canadian situation.
Canadians do internet searches on Canadian issues that lead them to my site. I’d like to think that I’m making other true conservatives feel like they’re not alone, as well as maybe converting a person or two who happen to stumble upon my site (According to my traffic counter, more than one of you dirty birds came here by doing a search for “Canadian Trannies” and were linked to my previous article on the subject).
Conservative Canadians are a moderately sized minority in this country, but one wouldn’t know it from reading newspapers or watching TV. Unlike the US, they have zero representation in the public sphere. “News” is reported with a blatant leftwing bias. The majority of my articles on this blog deal with taking Globe & Mail (newspaper) articles and rewriting them from a conservative standpoint; exposing their biases and logical errors.
Today is going to be no different. I recently came across two articles which both deal with the same issue: Minorities in Canada being paid less, relative to their White counterparts, and how White ”racism” is to blame. They are both long articles, so read them first, and then come back here, where I will be cherry-picking sentences that rubbed me the wrong way, and rebutting them.
[The StatsCan Study] found that second-generation Blacks face a wage gap of about 10 to 15 per cent compared with non-visible minorities(??). The gap persists even though the results were controlled for education and residencial [sic] location.
Statscan didn’t explain why it think there’s a persistent wage gap — but it didn’t rule out discrimation[sic]. “Wage discrimination may or may not be a contributing factor,” the agency said.
Little economic research has delved into why the gap exists. But Statscan does cite a 2008 study, by University of Toronto professor Philip Oreopoulos, which found job applicants with English-sounding names are much more likely to get a job interview than applicants with non-English-sounding names.
This study was biased, as they undoubtedly only attempted to entrap White-run companies. Did they try a study where they sent English-sounding names to East-Indian or Chinese-run companies (Two ethnic groups who are notoriously nepotistic)?
I’m sure their results would have shown definite ANTI-White bias in that case, more so than the anti-minority bias noticed above. Newspapers are always pointing to anti-minority employer bias, but there are very real instances of ANTI-White bias that are never mentioned.
Anyone who has ever traveled through Vancouver International Airport, or Toronto’s Pearson Airport, can attest to the fact that the staff is at least80% NON-white (Canada is about 84% White majority). Journalists fly all the time. Maybe they are all as good at “not seeing colour” as they claim. More likely, the pro-minority/anti-white bias in hiring doesn’t fit in with their worldview, so they don’t write about it, unless to celebrate it. Like in a paragraph from the second article.
She (a minority who suspected that she was being passed over for promotions in a previous job) has since found her niche, earning a salary close to six figures with an employer whose work force is 50% visible minority. “I’m treated very fairly here,” she said.
Where is the outrage that she now works in an office in which a certain segment of the population (Whites) is under-represented in comparison to its proportion of the general population? Oh yeah, they’re White, so it doesn’t matter. More minorities = better.
[The study] also looked at gender, and found second-generation males who are visible-minorities tend to earn less than their White counterparts “in spite of the fact that they are more likely to live in large centres and that they have higher levels of educational attainment.”
This was the dumbest sentence in either article. The biggest salaries in the big cities are definitely higher than those earned out in the country. But the average salary in the country is much higher than the average salary in the city, because men in the country do real, productive work; like work in the oil & gas or mining industries, as well as agriculture and logging. Those jobs pay high wages. People in the city (especially minorities) are likely to be working in the low-paying service industry.
Again, the Globe and Mail chooses to view facts subjectively through an ANTI-White lens, instead of objectively. There are many reasons for a wage gap that don’t involve “racism”: Genetically determined traits, such as IQ and temperament, and choice of job. You will notice that the article didn’t state that Black doctors are getting paid less than White doctors. If more Whites become doctors, and more Blacks become janitors, the racial wage average is going to be skewed in favour of White people.
Adjusting for education doesn’t mean anything. It all comes down to job choice. Is there active discrimination in hiring by White-run companies? Probably. They may prefer to hire people who fit in, rather than visible-minorities with an axe to grind. But minority-run companies are much worse for racially discriminating practices, and the media is silent on that issue. >Source
I am a university professor. What interests me is how our (Canadian) universities have been radically turned away from our Western heritage. As your organization well knows, university administrators are looking for ways to make our universities more and more “international”, and in this effort are asking professors to teach more “relevant” non-western topics. UBC (University of British Columbia) is, for all intents and purposes, an Asian university with a few sheepish Canadian characters underground. It is pathetic that a nation can be so lacking in pride.
+++++++++
FROM H.A. :
I am an immigrant from Mainland China. I work for a bottling company just outside Toronto. About a year ago, the company started hiring young East Indian workers. There are now 30 to 40 of them working at this plant. I found out that these workers entered Canada on student visas to attend two colleges. However, they are not attending classes. They work at the bottling company and are paid $7 per hour cash. I have reported this information to the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), but nothing has been done. The CBSA admits that it gets so many complaints about immigration violations in southern Ontario, that it cannot handle them. It seems to me that 30 to 40 illegal East Indian workers should be a significant issue for the CBSA or for the Canada Revenue Agency (and the Canadian public) who are getting cheated out of income taxes. What is going on? Why is no enforcement happening?
++++++++++++
FROM C.W. and M.B. :
Globe and Mail reporter Joe Friesen recently authored an article entitled “The Philippines Now Canada’s Top Sources Of Immigrants”. According to the article, about 40,000 Filipinos arrived between January and September, 2010.
In the article, the reporter didn’t even ask whether Canada needed these people. He just seemed to assume that this was the case. Is this reporter as clueless as he sounds or have he and others at The Globe and Mail been told not to ask questions and merely tell Canadians how wonderful they are to allow Filipinos into Canada so that the Filipinos can send $1.5 Billion in remittances to the Philippines. Remittances now amount to more than 10% of the Philippines’ annual GDP. Reporter Joe also told us that the Philippine government regards these people as “heroes of the nation”.
Reporter Joe probably doesn’t know that in a B.C. (British Columbia) town recently, Smitty’s Restaurant replaced the Canadian cook with a Filipino cook. So did the local A&W. I suspect other franchise restaurants are doing the same thing all across Canada. If people walk into a Tim Horton’s in western Canada, they find that the majority of the staff are Filipinos.
Are these low-paid people then going to collect federal tax credits or provincial “working poor” subsidies because they earn so little? Next week, can we expect “clueless” Joe to do a report on displaced Canadian workers or on the real cost to Canada of importing Filipino (and other) workers that Canada does not need?
++++++++
FROM W.J. :
So I’m in downtown Toronto. I’ve just gotten into a taxi to go to a hospital to have work done on my leg. The driver is a new Canadian, of Indian ethnicity, I think. Quite affable. Mid 40s, GQish, modern, good looking, middle class. He looks like one of those guys, supposedly with PhDs, driving a taxi because his credentials weren’t recognized.
“I’ll give you $10 for the trip to St. Mike’s (St. Michael’s Hospital)”, I said.
“No problem, we’ll do that for you, sir”, he replied.
He sported a small 3″ by 3″ picture of himself with a woman and two young kids on the dash, as many cab drivers do.
“Nice picture. Is that your family”? I said.
“Yes, sir”, he answered.
“Where are you from originally…India?”, I asked.
“No, Pakistan, Sir”, he replied, quite affably.
“Oh, Pakistan. I see”, I said. “You know, while sitting at the doctor’s office an hour ago, I read an article about white people born in India. I was surprised. Is that true?” I asked—just speaking my mind and making small talk. I know people often respond well to candour…
“Oh, yes, there are white people in India, from when the British were there. There were some in Pakistan too, but not any more. They mostly left”.
“Interesting. I had no idea there were Caucasians who are Indian or Pakistani. You don’t usually think of that. Why did many leave?”, I asked, just curious…
“I don’t know…in fact, a high Minister in Pakistan has grandparents who were British….”, he said, quite nonchalantly.
“Oh, interesting. So … are those white people considered true Pakistani…are they accepted….?”, I asked, rather innocently.
His tone changed, and he hastily responded ..”They never stayed. They left. They are back in Britain, or around the world somewhere.”
“Really. Interesting….Why is that?” I pressed again, eager to find out the answer and to learn something about an obscure aspect of Eastern Society.
Very quickly now, speaking rapidly and in a high, stressed pitch, he added, “If they stayed, they would be killed. So they leave. Only Muslims can live in Pakistan. They won’t convert. So they go”. . . and he went on, elaborating the point for some time…
“Yeah, there is an extremist element to Islam, I know. . . but we in the West have extremist Christians, too. Every religion has its whackos….” I said, trying to be empathetic.
As if he didn’t hear me, he went on in the same fast-paced, high-pitched way, “The Koran is very specific about Islam..you must convert…it respects all religions…. Jesus Christ, you know, he came before Mohammed, so he too is respected…”
And I said, “Yeah, but look at Salman Rushdie…they put a bounty on Rushdie’s head because he wrote something negative about Mohammed…that’s just crazy…”, I interjected, (laughing).
He responded, continuing in a very fast-paced tone…louder now…wagging his finger at some invisible figure on the dashboard…..”No. Not, not crazy. He insulted Islam. In Islam, no one may speak against the Prophet. No one can speak against Islam. That is why they will kill him. If I saw him right here, right now, I would kill him. That’s it. I would kill him right now. I wouldn’t even have to think about it…Kill him..”
And I had to ask, again not losing my composure, quite earnestly…”so…ah…. are you a Muslim, Sir?”
“Yes…and the Koran…it is a very good book. You should read it. It has much wisdom in there. You should read the Koran. It is very peaceful. Very peace-loving. Only if you speak out against the Koran or Islam, that you must not do…”
We arrived at the hospital on Bond Street. The gentleman accepted my $10, and I left. . . and, amazed that there is truth to these warnings, in television shows like “24″ and “Sherlock Homes” and from moderate Pakistani radio announcers and academics. Extremism is in our midst after all…
So, the moral is: next time you take a cab, ask whatever you like. You might be amazed at what you discover…. Needless to say, CBC TV’s “Little Mosque on the Prairie” will never have someone like this taxi driver appear as a character on that program. >Source
Where does all this stuff that you’ve heard about this morning – the victim feminism, the gay rights movement, the invented statistics, the rewritten history, the lies, the demands, all the rest of it – where does it come from?
For the first time in our history, Americans [Canadians, Brits, Australians, Europeans] have to be fearful of what they say, of what they write, and of what they think. They have to be afraid of using the wrong word, a word denounced as offensive or insensitive, or racist, sexist, or homophobic.
We have seen other countries, particularly in this century where this has been the case. And we have always regarded them with a mixture of pity, and to be truthful, some amusement, because it has struck us as so strange that people would allow a situation to develop where they would be afraid of what words they used. But we now have this situation in this country. We have it primarily on college campuses, but it is spreading throughout the whole society. Where does it come from? What is it?
We call it “Political Correctness.”
The name originated as something of a joke, literally in a comic strip, and we tend still to think of it as only half-serious. In fact, it’s deadly serious. It is the great disease of our century, the disease that has left tens of millions of people dead in Europe, in Russia, in China, indeed around the world. It is the disease of ideology. PC is not funny. PC is deadly serious.
If we look at it analytically, if we look at it historically, we quickly find out exactly what it is. Political Correctness is cultural Marxism. It is Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms. It is an effort that goes back not to the 1960s and the hippies and the peace movement, but back to World War I. If we compare the basic tenets of Political Correctness with classical Marxism, the parallels are very obvious.
First of all, both are totalitarian ideologies. The totalitarian nature of Political Correctness is revealed nowhere more clearly than on college campuses, many of which at this point are small ivy covered North Koreas, where the student or faculty member who dares to cross any of the lines set up by the gender feminist or the homosexual-rights activists, or the local black or Hispanic group, or any of the other sainted “victims” groups that PC revolves around, quickly find themselves in judicial trouble. Within the small legal system of the college, they face formal charges – some star-chamber proceeding – and punishment. That is a little look into the future that Political Correctness intends for the nation .
Indeed, all ideologies are totalitarian because the essence of an ideology (I would note that conservatism correctly understood, is not an ideology) is to take some philosophy and say on the basis of this philosophy certain things must be true – such as the whole of the history of our culture is the history of the oppression of women. Since reality contradicts that, reality must be forbidden. It must become forbidden to acknowledge the reality of our history. People must be forced to live a lie, and since people are naturally reluctant to live a lie, they naturally use their ears and eyes to look out and say,“Wait a minute. This isn’t true. I can see it isn’t true,” the power of the state must be put behind the demand to live a lie. That is why ideology invariably creates a totalitarian state.
Second, the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness, like economic Marxism, has a single factor explanation of history. Economic Marxism says that history is determined by ownership of means of production. Cultural Marxism, or Political Correctness, says that all history is determined by power, by which groups defined in terms of race, sex, etc., have power over which other groups. Nothing else matters. All literature, indeed, is about that. Everything in the past is about that one thing.
Third, just as in classical economic Marxism certain groups, i.e. workers and peasants, are a priori good, and other groups, i.e., the bourgeoisie and capital owners, are evil. In the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness certain groups are good – feminist women, (only feminist women, non-feminist women are deemed not to exist) blacks, Hispanics, homosexuals. These groups are determined to be “victims,” and therefore automatically good regardless of what any of them do. Similarly, white men are determined automatically to be evil, thereby becoming the equivalent of the bourgeoisie in economic Marxism.
Fourth, both economic and cultural Marxism rely on expropriation. When the classical Marxists, the communists, took over a country like Russia, they expropriated the bourgeoisie, they took away their property. Similarly, when the cultural Marxists take over a university campus, they expropriate through things like quotas for admissions.
When a white student with superior qualifications is denied admittance to a college in favor of a black or Hispanic who isn’t as well qualified, the white student is expropriated. And indeed, affirmative action, in our whole society today, is a system of expropriation. White owned companies don’t get a contract because the contract is reserved for a company owned by, say, Hispanics or women. So expropriation is a principle tool for both forms of Marxism.
And finally, both have a method of analysis that automatically gives the answers they want. For the classical Marxist, it’s Marxist economics. For the cultural Marxist, it’s deconstruction. Deconstruction essentially takes any text, removes all meaning from it and re-inserts any meaning desired.
So we find, for example, that all of Shakespeare is about the suppression of women, or the Bible is really about race and gender. All of these texts simply become grist for the mill, which proves that “all history is about which groups have power over which other groups.” So the parallels are very evident between the classical Marxism that we’re familiar with in the old Soviet Union and the cultural Marxism that we see today as Political Correctness.
But the parallels are not accidents. The parallels did not come from nothing. The fact of the matter is that Political Correctness has a history, a history that is longer than many people are aware of outside a small group of academics who have studied this. And the history goes back, as I said, to World War I, as do so many of the pathologies that are today bringing down our society and culture. >full article.
How can one tell when a public figure is good for his or her country?
Very simply… the Establishment media will castigate that person, concoct all manner of vile lies against him or her, and then use the robots of the military to smash said individual. Such as with the heinous crimes perpetrated against Saddam Hussein and the people of Iraq, the latest victim of globalist tyranny is the honourable Libyan regime headed (so we are told) by Colonel Muammar al-Qaddafi.
The liars in Westminster (London) who – lest we forget – justified the carnage in Iraq with the faery tale of ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction‘ are now ceaselessly jabbering about how the government in Libya is anti-democratic and how ‘we‘ must save them – by raping their economy and butchering their population.
What is the truth about the leader of Libya? Well, for a start, he is the titular head of the nation, but unlike the tyrant of Buckingham Palace, he has no real power. So much for the ‘mad dictator‘ we hear about.
Far from being the enemy of the people, Qaddafi is revered as the beloved ‘Great Brother, Leader of the Revolution‘. More than any African figure, he has consistently promoted peace and prosperity for the continent, arguing that its destiny lies in wrenching itself free from foreign imperialism.
Qadaffi is a fervent supporter of Arab unity, and stands unwaveringly against Zionism. However, he is not a supporter of religious extremism, as the biased globalist media would have it. (Odd, how Zionism is never portrayed as extreme…)
We are told that Qadaffi is a monster and a despot, and that the people of Libya live in fear. This is pure propaganda nonsense. Far from being a dictator, Qadaffi is an advocate of genuine popular rule. In his ‘Green Book‘ he accurately describes western-style democracy as a trick by which rule is given over to…..
“a dictatorship in the seat of power garbed in the guise of democracy…democracy can only exist with the presence of the people, and not in the presence of representatives of the people.
Parliaments have become a legal barrier between people and their right to exercise authority. They exclude the masses in order to prevent them from practicing politics, and monopolise the control of politics in their name…the people are prey fought over by the predators: instruments of government compete in their power struggle for the votes of the people they in turn neglect and exploit.
In order to rule, the opposition party must defeat the existing instrument of government. To do so, the opposition must undermine the government’s achievements and cast doubt on its plans, even if these plans were beneficial to society, to prove the incompetence of the current governing instrument. Consequently, the interests and programmes of society become victims of the power struggle raging among the political parties”.
How true.
Qadaffi does not merely highlight the fallacy of Western Democracy, he offers an alternative. >continued HERE.
Ian Birk
