“And You Call Me A Racist?!”

Million Man March, Washington, D.C.

[The following item was taken from cyberspace whose author is unknown]

There are African-Americans, Mexican-Americans, Asian-Americans, Arab-Americans, Native-Americans, etc….. and then there are just Americans.

You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction. You call me white boy, cracker, honkey, whitey, caveman” …..and that’s OK.

But, when I call you nigger, kike, towelhead, sand-nigger, camel jockey, beaner, gook, or chink, you call me a racist.

You say that Whites commit a lot of violence against you, but why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live? You have the United Negro College Fund. You have Martin Luther King Day. You have Black History Month. You have Cesar Chavez Day. You have Ma’uled Al-Nabi. You have the NAACP. You have B.E.T.

If, we had W.E.T. (White Entertainment Television), we’d be racists. If we had a White Pride Day, you would call us racists. If, we had White History Month, we’d be racists. If, we had any organization for only Whites to advance our lives, we’d be racists.

You have a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber of Commerce, and then we just have the plain Chamber of Commerce. Wonder who pays for that?

If we had a college fund that only gave White students scholarships, you know we’d be racists. There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the US,…… yet, if there were “White colleges” that would be a racist college.

In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights. If we marched for our race and rights, you would call us racists.

You are proud to be Black, Brown, Yellow, and you’re not afraid to announce it, but when we announce our White pride, you call us racists.

You rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us. But, when a White police officer shoots a Black gang member or beats up a Black drug-dealer running from the law and posing a threat to society, you call him a racist.

I am proud. But, you still call me a racist.

Why is it that only Whites can be racists? There is nothing improper about this email. Let’s see which of you are proud enough to forward it. —Anonymous

Highly recommended read: Truth, Heresy, & Heroes

ALSO READ:

“Racist, Racist!”

The RACISM Ploy

Racism – It’s Everywhere

The Dreaded “Racist” Label

Racism – The New Witchcraft Hysteria

“Racist” Pre-School Children

Jun28

Image via Wikipedia

Tristin Hopper, National Post

Along with finger-painting and story time, Canadian preschools are also spilling over with ethnic tension, according to a study released by Concordia University.

“We found Asian-Canadian and French-Canadian (White) children seemed to prefer interacting with kids of the same ethnic background,” said report co-author Nadine Girouard in a Tuesday release.

At mixed-race daycares throughout Montreal, researchers took Asian-Canadian children and French Canadian (White) children, ranging in age from three to five years old, and paired them up in rooms with “attractive toys” such as a marble track, or a Sesame Street-themed playhouse.

When put in with members of the same race, children happily played together. When mixed with different races, however, the children usually opted to play alone. Preschoolers “express a preference for same-ethnic interactions,” reads the study.

The revelation is nothing new. For more than 60 years, psychologists have been finding evidence of barely-toilet-trained children exhibiting prejudicial tendencies.

In the late 1940s, American psychologists Kenneth and Mamie Clark tried to gauge the inherent prejudices of children by showing them black and white dolls and asking which was better. Whether the child was white or black, the child “indicated a clear-cut preference for white.” “It is clear that the Negro child, by the age of five is aware of the fact that to be colored in contemporary American society is a mark of inferior status,” the pair wrote.

Their research was ultimately a factor in the 1954 US Supreme Court Decision to de-segregate public schools. In subsequent American studies, researchers have found black and white children self-segregating as early as kindergarten.

[Read: Students Learn To "White Flight" ]

Prejudice in children first starts to crop up right around the age of three or four (years), says Frances Aboud, a McGill University psychology professor specializing in the development of “racism” in children. The first time children come up against different ethnicities, their initial reaction is “nobody in my family looks like that,” says Ms. Aboud. “Sometimes kids even go so far as to say that a child is intentionally trying not to look like him,” she says.

The Montreal study attributes the rift between the Asian-Canadian and French Canadian (White) children to nothing more than cultural awkwardness. Rather than being driven apart by animosity, the two groups are simply baffled by one another. Raised in a culture of social restraint, the Asian-Canadian children were more likely to try to interact non-verbally with the French-Canadians by silently “cooperating” in playing with a toy. French-Canadian children, meanwhile, would try to engage their Asian-Canadian playmates in conversation. After a few confusing minutes, the two children usually found it easier to part ways….. and play in silence.

(……and now the politically-correct salve is applied, so as not to offend anyone’s feelings…Ed.)

However, the “beauty” of the Montreal study, says Ms. Girouard, is that the Asian-Canadians and French-Canadians ultimately learned to overcome their differences and play together. “Children found mutually satisfactory and effective means of engaging one another,” reads the study. Once-subdued Asian-Canadians began to talk louder and (White) French-Canadians responded by quieting down. “Each was able to import the culture of the other,” says Ms. Girouard. “Children, regardless of their ethnicity, want to play together and understand each other.” -Source

Canada’s Immigrants No Help To Us

Jun23

James Bissett

By James Bissett,

The recent election campaign focused a great deal of attention on immigrant communities. There are good reasons for this.

Since 1990, Canada has been accepting about (250,000) newcomers each year…. and these numbers have caused a dynamic transformation in the demographic characteristics of our country.

The pace of change is underlined by research done by Statistics Canada showing the phenomenal growth in the number of so-called ethnic enclaves since the early 1980s. Statistics Canada defines an ethnic enclave as a community where over 30 per cent of the population is of one ethnic group other than English or French. In 1981, there were six ethnic enclaves in Canada.

Today, there are 260 (ethnic enclaves)!!

Immigration has also had a powerful impact on our political system. All of the political parties favour large-scale immigration. Every immigrant is seen by them as a potential voter for their party. The politicians justify high immigration levels by claiming immigration is “desperately” needed to sustain our economic growth, enhance our labour force and combat our so-called aging problem.

Last year, Canada received 281,000 immigrants – the highest number since 1957.

In addition, 182,000 “temporary” foreign workers arrived, so that by the end of the year, there were 283,000 of these workers in the country. There were also 218,000 foreign “students” here and most of the temporary workers and students will remain permanently. There is also a massive backlog of over one million immigrants waiting to come who have met all of the entry requirements.

These are very high numbers – on a per-capita basis, no other country receives as many immigrants. Clearly, the program is out of control, but our political leaders seem incapable of acknowledging there is a problem and continue to urge even higher numbers.

It is significant that of the 281,000 immigrants who arrived in 2010, only 17 per cent, or 48,800, were skilled workers selected for their potential contribution to our labour force. The remainder were spouses and children accompanying them, relatives sponsored by people already in Canada, immigrants sponsored by the provinces, refugees or others accepted for humanitarian reasons. So much for helping our economy or labour force!

There are few economists today who argue that immigration is a significant factor in economic development. Studies in Canada since the MacDonald Royal Commission Report of 1985 and the Economic Council of Canada’s studies in the early 1990s concluded that immigration was NOT necessary for economic prosperity.

In 2003, Prof. Alan Green of Queen’s University released a study that argued that while immigration had been useful in the past, the economic argument for it had largely disappeared and that the current political posture of using immigration to solve economic problems was no longer valid.

In 2008, Prof. Herb Grubel of Simon Fraser University, in a landmark study, showed that the 2.5 million immigrants who had come to Canada from 1990 to 2002 had received in benefits and services in one year (2002) $18,300,000,000 (Billion!).more than they had paid in taxes. That amount was more than the federal government spent on health care and twice what was spent on defence in fiscal 2000-2001.

Studies in the United States and Britain have reached similar conclusions.

In 2008, the British House of Lords warned that the plan to admit 190,000 immigrants per year would achieve little benefit and criticized the Labour government for misleading the public by justifying such high levels, which provided no economic benefit and were not needed to fill labour force demands.

Demographic studies in various countries have conclusively put to rest the myth that immigration can help a country overcome its aging problem. In 2006, the C.D. Howe Institute study, Immigration Cannot Keep Canada Young, pointed out that to have any significant impact on aging, Canada would have to accept several million immigrants each year.

Despite all of the evidence to the contrary, our political parties – even the Green party -repeatedly advocate raising our immigration levels, and do so, as they did in 2008, regardless of economic down turn. The name of the game is to get more numbers, because numbers are seen as voters.

In fact, the pressure to increase immigration has become such an overwhelming obsession with politicians that our overseas visa officers do not have time to interview prospective immigrants and the vast majority are no longer seen or interviewed.

The assessment of qualifications is done by reviewing documentation and the visas are issued by mail. Is there an employer in Canada who would hire someone without a personal interview?

Immigration is a critical public policy issue. The kind of Canada we will be in the future depends on the policies we follow today.

The dramatic changes in our demographic composition are being done without public knowledge or debate. This is wrong. There may be reasons why demographic change is desirable, or even inevitable, but if through mass immigration, the traditional society of a nation is in danger of becoming marginalized, then surely it should be done as a deliberate and open policy objective of government – and not driven by politicians competing desperately for ethnic votes.

Immigration has always been an integral part of the Canadian story and has made a powerful contribution to our historic achievements.

We must not allow our politicians to use it as a political game that patronizes the immigrants and damages our national interest.

James Bissett is a former ambassador and the executive director of the Canadian Immigration Service. He serves on the advisory board of the Centre for Immigration Policy Reform. – Source http://immigrationreform.ca/

ALSO READ:

Score Card: Immigrants 1, Canadians 0

Immigrants – Zero Effect on Economy

Immigrant Workers NOT Needed

S. A. Whites Fight For Survival

Jun6

(Note: This is a partial re-post of White Genocide of South Africa (linked below).

The battle-lines are being drawn in South Africa.

With 1 million Afrikaners now totally destitute and homeless, only because of the ANC regime’s deliberate barring this small minority access to any part of the job-sector and disowning their food-producing farms by a plethora of anti-white laws, the Afrikaners, the ‘white tribe of Africa’, are now battening down the hatches and preparing themselves for what they see as the final onslaught against their very survival rights on the African continent. They now have to fight back – there’s no longer any other choice: their backs are against the sea — and most Afrikaners, born and bred in southern Africa for many generations, have no other place to flee to, they say.

Also see our picture gallery (updated daily) of the great many recently murdered and traumatised white people in South Africa from feral gang attacks: Forty armed attacks are now carried out against families inside their well-protected homes in SA….. EVERY day:

Other events also show that Afrikaners especially, have every reason to worry that a genocide might well be brewing against them: in the townships, a worrying new trend is also developing: the growing strength of crime war-lords and gigantic taxi-associations which are increasingly replacing the outgunned, underfinanced and increasingly terrified SA police as the only defenders against the many feral-youth crime gangs terrorising the residents with their AK47s and their Uzi machineguns. The SA police force is unable to combat this mounting tsunami of violence, gang-rape and mindless murders. -Source-

ALSO READ:

Deadly Occupation – S.A. Farming

White Genocide in South Africa

The ‘Real’ South Africa Today

His LAST Interview

Sweden’s Racial Suicide Mission

Jun2

Location of ( dark green ) – on the European c...

SWEDEN

S.R. Larson

When I was politically active back in the ’80s, I learned that if Swedish politicians are given two alternative courses of action to choose between, they will, as if driven by a force of nature, always choose the dumbest alternative.

This learning experience has helped me understand Sweden’s slow but steady decline over the past 20 years, but it has also been a source of frustration.

This habit of always making things worse for the people of my native country has recently been inherited by a new generation of politicians. My old friends and political combatants are now part of the political elite – and making the same mistakes as their predecessors.

[...]

Once they had devalued Sweden from a prosperous world leader to a nation plagued by industrial poverty, they decided to take their country yet another step down the slope of Dante’s journey. Instead of a responsible immigration policy that would allow productive migration across the nation’s borders, the political elite opted for a maximized inflow of migrants. And it was not about getting immigrants with skills, education and ready-to-go professional skills.

No, the typical immigrant to Sweden over the past ten years has been someone with very little education, rudimentary professional skills and an extremely long way to go before he can begin to act as a productive member of society. (Read: 3rd world, illiterate, African immigrants/refugees) View this example video:

In the meantime, Sweden has suffered a brain drain. The education gap between the country’s inbound and outbound migrants is startling: the average person leaving Sweden has at least a bachelor’s degree. And the exodus has not been insignificant.In Norway alone, some 50,000 young Swedes are building themselves a future. It is unlikely that they will ever return home again.

The mistakes of the Sweden’s political elite of having turned into their very own religion has not stopped at replacing an entire generation of educated and culturally skilled Swedes with immigrants from the rural corners of Africa’s Horn.

The most recent contribution is likely to turn the country into an economic swamp of poverty and social disintegration. Mr. Goran Hagglund, minister of social affairs and responsible for Sweden’s socialized health care system, announced yesterday that the government will remove the last restrictions, on who, the tax-paid hospitals can offer health care. The purported purpose is to allow illegal immigrants to get access to health care on the same terms as lawful, tax-paying residents.

[...]

Since 1995 Sweden’s government-run health care system has cut away about one fifth of its medical staff. During the same time the real tax burden on working Swedes has increased almost 50 percent: those who pay taxes are a notably smaller share of the population than they were before the recession in the early ’90s.

With this lopsided change in who pays taxes into the health care system and the size of the “production facilities” – hospitals – about the worst thing you can do is to open the doors and let anyone from anywhere walk in to a Swedish hospital and demand health care. Which is precisely what the government has now done.

[...]

For each new mad move to tear the country apart, they leave fewer and fewer options ahead of them. One possibility is that they open the country’s income security system to illegal immigrants, i.e., everyone and anyone in the world. Another (possibility) is that they give illegals the right to vote in elections.

Absurd? Sure, but keep in mind: we are not talking about a normal country. We are talking about “Absurdistan”. -To Full Report