State Enforced Miscegenation
By Kathleen Moore
I am finally doing a little research on a key man behind the PanEuropa movement, one of the root causes responsible today for the advancing elimination of the nation-state in Europe (as in America) and their respective founding peoples. Wikipedia at the outset says:
“Coudenhove-Kalergi complemented his liberal views of the political role of the Jews with distinctive advocacy of race mixing (or miscegenation). In his book Praktischer Idealismus (Practical Idealism) he wrote:
“The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.”
“Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility by the Grace of Spirit. This happened at the moment when Europe’s feudal aristocracy became dilapidated, and thanks to Jewish emancipation. … ”
In fact, the Ancient Egyptians were comprised of several races, including red, white and black, and they therefore do not stand as a precedent.
What stands out for me today, in the (French President) Sakozy videos, are the following elements from that passage of Kalergi’s: “race-mixing”, “classes,” “artificial selection process”.
Kalergi is writing in 1925.
Charles Darwin published “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life” on 24 November 1859, a work of scientific literature considered to be the foundation of evolutionary biology. _
For the sixth edition of 1872, the title was shortened to “The Origin of Species”. Darwin’s book introduced the scientific theory that populations evolve over the course of generations through a process of “natural selection”. It presented a body of evidence that the “diversity” of life arose by common descent through a branching pattern of evolution.
It seems to me that what we are looking at in the views of such as Kalergi – whether he understood it or not, or perhaps was being duplicitous – is a reverse-engineering of human societies by means of “artificial selection” (the tool of livestock breeders, or breeders of poodles and lapdogs).
In reality, the goal or object is not a “diversity” of life “by common descent through a BRANCHING pattern of evolution”, but a REDUCTION of human racial, cultural and social “diversity” toward MASS UNIFORMITY. Thus, the unnatural goal is precisely to ELIMINATE “diversity” while disguising it as a laudable thing called “pluralism”, for example. But mass uniformity is NOT a quality of nature!
Neither does the socialist welfare state (advancing at the same time as this fast-tracked program of racial DIS-similarity) and which eliminates competition, qualify as a tool of social Darwinism. It is precisely anti-natural because it eliminates the very competition that in the view of evolutionists supposedly leads to “survival of the fittest” and to a natural improvement of species.
Kalergi’s program also presumes that Darwin has discovered a final scientific truth that is unrevisable; his kind of “artificial” tinkering thus may be fatal to other realities of nature that we may be unaware of.
If they keep on going, we should perhaps look like paramecia, and then like organic molecules, and then like primeval soup among the rocks again, if this artificial reductionism is a value in itself that must continue back to unknown “Origins”.
I think there is a hidden value here that could best be expressed as “elimi-NATION”. In other words, this road to mass uniformity falsely disguised as Darwinism is really a power grab by the self-appointed social controllers.
One may just as well call the specific “artificial” introduction of a new breed of bull to his cow by the farmer as “diversity”.
In the Sarkozy-sponsored program of forced “racial interbreeding” (métissage) to eliminate the White-race French people, it has no real meaning in and of itself except to misleadingly label a transient stage; for its non-admirable goal aims at breeding OUT both racial & cultural “diversity”. And, no doubt, diversity of views and tastes, which conceivably would result in more amenable and socially controllable populations, i.e., “lapdogs”. Or, the human term, slaves.
One might employ an “artificial selection process” to build a human master race. One might equally use it to build BOTH a slave race and a master race, simultaneously; for example, if one particular race has contrived to place itself behind nuclear-protected borders while simultaneously using DNA discrimination to keep its own species “pure”, while actively pushing mass-”métissage” for the rest of us.
If it is despicable to consciously use an “artificial selection process” to build a master race, is it less despicable to use it to build a slave race? For, to me, this is the essence of the command by socio-political race-farmer Sarkozy to the White French people to interbreed — failing which, “the State” will introduce measures “more coercive” than his public orders.
What would those coercive measures be? Mass-starvation and denial of jobs and aid to Whites… as in South Africa?
How about involuntary forced insemination? If they can do it with cows and dogs, what will stop them doing it to humans?
And why should we not call this program the Fourth Reich?
- School Forces White Kids to Sit with Minorities (mackquigley.wordpress.com)
- Muhammad Ali Speaks The Truth (1971) (elliotlakenews.wordpress.com)