In Defense of “Pale Males”
H/T to http://ozziesaffa.blogspot.co.nz/ who writes:
“Actually, this brilliant article can apply to the USA, and every other country where Whites reside … just as much as it does to South Africa“.
by TAU Bulletin
The state of the nation is no more ludicrously evident than Gauteng premier Nomvula Mokonyane’s recent “warning” that “pale males” would return to government in Gauteng (1 of 9 provinces in South Africa) if SA’s opposition Democratic Alliance party wins next year’s provincial election.
“It can’t happen, it will not happen” she declared. “Reversals in transformation are unacceptable, and the Gauteng public must be spared the ‘white gevaar’ (danger)”.
Where in the world are efficiency, skills, creativity and diligence seen as a danger? Only in South Africa, where so-called liberation credentials, party membership and loyalty trump the need to maintain the 1st world country and its infrastructure … which was handed to the ANC (African National Congress) on a plate after the 1994 election.
Ms. Mokonyane’s racial invective and resentment has been received with a muted tolerance. Despite the non-racial assurances in the Founding Provisions of South Africa’s constitution, the governing party’s racial diatribes against, mostly Whites, continues apace. Indeed, they seem to have increased.
The State President’s YouTube clip where he urges his supporters to “kill the boers” and that his cabinet would “kill with a machine gun” is still running, without any apparent move by YouTube to take it out of circulation. (Yet, a YouTube clip made by two White South Africans saying they refuse to apologize for being who they are … was taken off within a few days of its appearance on the internet.)
South Africa has two parallel universes – the ANC’s self-delusion, and that of reality. The fact that the country has dramatically slipped down the world’s various achievement indexes over the past 19 years, has either escaped Ms. Mokonyane’s notice, or she is disingenuous in the extreme.
Does the rather corpulent Ms. Mokonyane not realize that 90% of the food she and her countrymen consume is produced by “pale males”? That virtually everything she takes for granted in this country was created by “pale males”?
From where did the railways, roads, commercial farms, schools, hospitals, potable water and electricity transmission emanate?
The very language she uses in a legislature — which is not part of her cultural heritage — is a language of the “pale male”. The newsprint that distributes her humbug is not of her culture either. But she is selective in her vitriol. When this lady shops, she hurries to the “pale males’” luxury shopping centers: she was recently seen at up-market Hyde Park “posing proudly with her R10 000 LK Bennet shoes and matching handbag”. (Tony Leon, Business Day 30.7.13). “Pale males” are excoriated, but they are good enough to produce and supply the luxuries which she, and her fellow ANTI-white friends, cannot live without.
There is no empirical evidence to show that without the intervention of “others” in Africa (including “pale males”), Ms. Mokonyane’s (African) culture would not have evolved any further than that of those “lost” tribes one finds in the Amazon and Papua New Guinea. She should be grateful that that particular ship sailed around the Cape of Good Hope many years ago, and that it decided to stop for victuals. Non-pale male groups who could have manned that ship may not have been so conciliatory to the locals, then and now.
Who created the Sasols, the Iscors, the Eskoms and the country’s nuclear capacity? Who rid the country of the tste tste fly and malaria? Who developed Africa’s premier agricultural and veterinary service, used by the whole continent? Who produces maize and other grain surpluses year after year on the continent that cannot feed itself?
And, conversely, who is busy destroying what used to be the African continent’s “pin-up” country?
Certainly not “pale males”. Ms. Mokonyane and her compatriots should look in the mirror. But if one’s modus vivendi is self delusion, then blame is the name of the game. The world has taken note of the Africa of today, and It is not a pretty picture.
Zimbabwe went from the continent’s bread basket to a basket case. Few, if any, of the continent’s governments can feed their people. Corruption, nepotism, inefficiency and venality are the order of the day. South Africa is no exception. Who is to blame for Liberia’s status as an African cesspool, or for Ethiopia’s failed state ranking? Colonialism? Apartheid? “Pale males”? Neither of these countries was subjected to colonialism or apartheid. They are travesties because the people who live there … are who they are.
South Africa today could certainly do with some “pale males” to put things right. But this is not the ANC’s priority: a deep racial inferiority complex trumps practicality.
“Pale males” around the world are denounced by the non-achievers with relentless regularity. Whites in the United States complain about this, as well.
We quote Fred Reed from the US’s Nationalist Times:
“I am weary of the endless denunciation of ‘White privilege’; the calls to abolish all tests in which Whites excel, and the need to make universities and police forces, and advanced placement classes ‘look like American demographics’. It might be well to note, the utter dependence of the US on White men who have contributed virtually everything that keeps the affirmative-action classes from living in mud huts.”
Reed continues with examples of this contribution:
“Euclidean geometry, parabolic geometry, hyperbolic geometry and projective geometry. Physical chemistry, organic chemistry, biochemistry. Classical mechanics. The indeterminacy principle. The wave equation. The Parthenon. Air conditioning. Number theory. Romanesque architecture. Gothic architecture. Information theory. Entropy. Enthalpy. Almost every symphony ever written. Pierre August Renoir. The diatonic scale. The mathematics behind the twelfth root of two and all that. The Bohr-Sommerfeld atom. The purine pyrimidine structure of the DNA ladder. Single sideband radio. All other radio. Dentistry. The internal combustion engine. Turbojets, turbofans, Doppler beam-sharpening. Penicillin. Airplanes. Surgery. The mammogram. The Pill. The condom. Polio vaccine. The integrated circuit.“The computer, computational fluid dynamics. Euripides, Sophocles, Aristophanes, Homer. Glass. Rubber. Nylon. Roads. Buildings. Acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors. Silicone. The automobile. Bug spray. Public cryptography.”
“Like it or not, White men can do these things, have done them, and continue to do them. The evidence shows that all groups receiving affirmative action have not done them, and cannot do them, which is why they need affirmative action.
“The pattern of White men doing difficult things … continues. Consider the founders of companies in information technologies. Not quite all White, but all men. Anyone who watched the landing of Curiosity on the planet Mars will have noticed that Mission Control consisted overwhelmingly of White men. If I were rude, I would say to those who criticize: invent your own things.”
Reed cites South Africa as an example of a tragedy in the making. “A constantly dwindling number of Whites are at the mercy of a predatory welfare class, and it’s possible they can’t, and won’t carry the rest of the population. If things get worse for them, they will simply flee the country.”
Whether this scenario plays itself out in South Africa is up to the Whites. But Ms. Mokonyane mustn’t take too much for granted. Her dislike of “pale males” borders on the obsessive, to the point where common sense and practical considerations for the benefit of all South Africans are cast aside in an all-consuming and embittered realization that her ANC cannot feed its people, cannot govern, and are no better than what the world has seen emanate from the rest of the (African) continent over the past 50 years. She knows this, the ANC knows this, and the world knows it. Keeping out the “pale males” won’t improve the ANC. This racial animosity is inimical not only to Whites but, eventually, to the future of all South Africans.
The “pale male” acrimony is however selective. Ex-president Nelson Mandela was not interned in an ANC-run hospital. The new ANC elite have quietly bought houses in so-called White areas.
They send their children to White schools. They want the “pale male’s” education system. (Every university in South Africa is a White creation). What is the yardstick against which anything of worth in South Africa, is judged, if not, against a “pale male-created” yardstick? Are the elite’s suits bought from Nigeria … or Italy? Is there such a thing as a Ghanian IPod? Do they fly Air Kenya … or British Airways? Do they go to Mali for their holidays … or to Paris?
A South African business journalist refers to “the African No” – “a jumbled melee of endless meetings, unreturned phone calls and ignored e-mails”.
Compare this approach with the White world. The United States, for example, accounts for 4.5% of the world’s population, but 25% of the world’s GDP. When people flee their terrible countries they try for Europe, Australia and other “pale male” bastions. They don’t want to emigrate to Zambia or the Sudan.
A cursory trawl through South Africa’s productive sector sees “pale males” as police divers, as rescue helicopter pilots, as paramedics, as the donors to charities, as the bedrock of the taxpayer base, as the under-pinners of the medical profession, the service industry, the banking and the mining sector. The country is divided into the producers and the consumers, and we know on which side of the divide the “pale male” sits.
Virtually all of the productive farms that were handed over to ANC (African National Congress) supporters under the government’s land redistribution policy failed: a pithy example of “pale male” producers, and the ANC-created destruction.
It is a pity that more media space is not given to a frank analysis of who are the drivers of the South African economy, instead of, to those who talk about nationalization, about transformation, about White “racism” and so-called “privilege”.
South Africans might get a clearer picture of who is really important in the grand scheme of things, as opposed to those who can talk the leg off an iron pot, hold press conferences, fly all over the world first class, endlessly discuss turnaround strategies, and blame everyone, but themselves, for their own shortcomings.
Within ten years, South Africa’s social spending (including huge government employee wage bills) will exceed government revenue. Employee compensation as a share of government income went from 31.7% in 2008 to 44.3% in 2012. South Africa’s “pale males” are a finite group – even they cannot hope to foot the bill for this parasite profligacy forever. Maybe then, South Africa will value its “pale males”, but it may be too late. >Source
(For added emphasis, Bold print, underlined words are by ELN Editor)
… other South African-related articles
under the “category” selection HERE.
- South Africa – Genocidal Slaughterhouse (elliotlakenews.wordpress.com)
- South Africa – Blacks vs Whites (elliotlakenews.wordpress.com)