ELLIOT LAKE News

Political INcorrect Constructs Arranged To Awaken Slumbering Minds…

Archive for the category “History”

U.S. Dollar Decline

By Ann Barnhardt

PART 1

If you know how bad the situation is and don’t feel the need to subject yourself to any more of my patented Barnhardt Phillipic and Funeral Dirge for Civilization, take your leave now, because I honestly think that this is the the saddest, most profoundly depressing post I have yet written. And I’ve written a few. A few thousand.

This is a $5 Federal Reserve Note, Series of 1...

$5 Federal Reserve Note, Series of 1928. Note the numerical Federal Reserve Seal.

The topic is the US Dollar, and currency in general. The Federal Reserve has been willfully and systematically debasing the US dollar for a century by claiming that 2% inflation is the benchmark of a healthy economy. Since the universities and media have been overrun by Marxists, there is hardly anyone alive who:    A.) is in possession of the capacity to independently think and reason their way through such a question, and B.) anyone who cares in the first place.

In addition to the slow grinding debasement by the Fed, the Marxists have finally fully usurped and overthrown the government of the United States, and thus have now executed the coup de grace: wild, flagrant money “printing”, and by “printing”, please understand that we are not talking about the fabrication of paper bills. We are talking about computerized entries into the Federal Reserve’s ledger.

The Fed literally types in an addition of x billion or y trillion dollars into its balance sheet – creating dollars out of thin air that exist as zeroes and ones on a computer server – and then use those new dollars to purchase US Treasury bonds. In this way, the Obama regime and its puppetmasters have debased the US dollar by roughly one half the total GDP in less than four years. This iteration of both the United States and the US Dollar are over. There is no way to walk back the damage that the Obama regime has done. They have accomplished their mission, no matter what happens from this day forward.

After reading and reviewing my texts on monetary theory from Mises, Hayek, Friedman and contemporary economists including Denninger, I have come to a profound realization about money and the fiat vs commodity money (i.e. gold-backed currency) debate – and it bodes very, very poorly for us.

First, a few preliminary points.

Gold Key, weighing one kilogram is used to acc...

1. Going to a gold standard will solve nothing. This is not to say that I don’t think that gold and silver are good wealth storage vehicles in this situation. To the contrary, I think they are excellent for these times. BUT, simply reverting to the gold standard, in and of itself, will not turn us around. We will, at some point, be FORCED to revert to the primordial commodity currency paradigm simply because our government and society will collapse, and thus our currency with it. If and when our culture rebuilds itself, if we remain as we are, the exact same problems that have arisen under the fiat money system will emerge again, even under a gold-backed currency.

So why has civilization — up until just within the last few decades — operated on commodity money systems, and why is it plausible to think that any fiat currency could ever have any legitimacy? The reason why civilization has used commodity money, namely gold and silver, up until just recently is because up until just recently, there was no way to instantly verify money held on deposit, or the existence of a line of credit.

With computers and the internet, such instant checks are as common as breathing, blinking and walking. We don’t even think about it anymore. We go to the sandwich shop, get our sandwich, and in less than three seconds, the vendor has confirmed that we have funds, and then transferred those funds into his account. In the centuries and millennia past, people would load chests filled with gold coinage and jewels onto sailing ships and set out for distant lands. Why did they take their gold and jewels with them and risk losing that money to shipwreck or piracy? Because they had to take it with them. The only way to confirm your wealth to others was to physically possess it.

Physical possession and spot exchange was also the only way to execute mercantile transactions. If we lose telecommunications and computing ability due to the successful detonation of an Electromagnetic Pulse weapon, or simply due to the total breakdown of society and the ability to maintain and power such systems, then indeed, this argument will become moot. BUT, so long as there is near-instant data transmission, commodity money will be theoretically optional (*with a qualifier to be addressed later in Part 3).

While we are looking at history, it bears mentioning that metals-backed currencies have not prevented other economic calamities. Just in the United States, the Great Depression of the 1930’s and the post-Civil War depression of 1873-1879, now called the Long Depression, which was actually caused by the manipulation of silver demand by the German Empire, were not magically prevented by metals-backed currency. Returning to a gold standard would not prevent recessions from happening. In fact, recessions are a necessary fact of economies, and serve to deflate bubbles and restore equilibrium. The only people who promise to eliminate economic recessions are Marxists, and that is because Marxists are liars.

Just as all respiring beings on earth must both inhale and exhale, so to must economies. A person who perpetually inhaled would eventually burst their lungs and die. Conversely, a person who could only exhale would asphyxiate and die. But both actions, in a balanced, moderate cycle, are the definition of health. It is the same with economies: periods of expansion followed by a healthy, normal contraction that deflated any bubbles and restored equilibrium, thus setting up the next expansion phase.

2. Metals-backed currencies can be corrupted, too. There are two ways to corrupt a metals-backed currency, and it has happened many, many times throughout history. The first means pertains to coinage, and is to corrupt the metal itself with cheaper metals, such as zinc. The Roman denarius was debased from 4.5 grams of pure silver to less than one tenth of a gram of silver. Hyperinflation was the inevitable result, and the currency had to eventually be totally replaced.

The second means — which pertains to paper and electronic currency — is for the government to lie about the reserve quantity. This could either be done by explicitly lying about the number of ounces in storage, OR could be done by clandestinely issuing dollars to cronies of the oligarchy, which were NOT actually backed by any metal, and thus would be a de facto lie as to the supply. Since the people would be unable to demand a daily audit and reconciliation, the ability to police and reconcile the supply of metal and dollars would be impossible, and exactly the same things that are going on today, namely government looting of the Treasury and debasement of the currency, would continue apace.  >continue to Parts 2 and 3.

(For added emphasis, Bolded, underlined and Italic words are done by ELN Editor)

Also Read:

The Value of Money

Understanding “Money”

*************************

Biggest Scam in History

Economic Plan of Germany’s NSDAP

The Value of “Money”

From DailyKenn.com

How Money Works

Marxism Utilizes Multiculturalism To Manipulate Our Economy

The original money was labor that produced something of value.

One neighbor would help the other hoe his garden, and the other would help him patch his chicken coop. Productive labor was the original exchange medium.

The red color of beets comes from betalain pig...

Red Beets

The stuff produced by labor was as valuable as the work itself. One would spend a day in the field raising beets. Then, when he needed eggs, he would trade ten beets for ten hen’s eggs from his neighbor.

Stuff — such as beets and eggs — was the exchange medium that represented productive labor, which is defined as the production of marketable goods or services.

Gold Key, weighing one kilogram is used to acc...

Precious metals (gold and silver) eventually became the preferred item to exchange. It could be weighed precisely, couldn’t have an unexpected rotten center, and couldn’t break on the way home. Furthermore, it could be saved indefinitely.

Kings began controlling the circulation of precious metals. They would forge pre-weighed units as ‘coins‘ and have their image stamped on each one to validate authenticity. One coin would be worth five beets or a dozen eggs, or a day in the field. Everyone knew the value of each coin.

Productive labor was the standard that gave coins value. A coin represented the stuff that represented productive labor.

Banks and governments that owned and controlled gold and silver began offering notes that represented their coins that represented stuff that represented productive labor. Notes issued by the British government were called pounds, an etymological throwback to the weight of sterling silver. American notes were called dollars.

Banks then allowed checks that represented notes that represented coins that represented stuff that represented productive labor.

Banks have now gone a step further. They allow electronic bytes that represent… What?

Economists consider the money supply to consist of fiat money, that is, it’s backed by nothing.

Checks are nearly obsolete. Notes (dollars) are used less frequently. Gold and silver coins have long since been displaced by cheap metals, and the gold standard that underpinned the value of currency is no longer applied.

• The Productive Labor Standard still stands

When you access your bank account via the Internet to view the digital numbers on your computer screen, those electronic bytes represent the dollar notes that once represented precious metal coins that represented stuff that represents productive labor.

Your productive labor is literally converted to digital units displayed on your computer screen as recorded on the bank’s computer.

If we suppose those digital numbers represent gold and silver stacked up in the bank’s vaults (or stacks of paper that once had the same value as gold and silver), we are mistaken. They represent our productive labor.

When someone uses a government-issued EBT card, they are purchasing goods and services with someone else’s productive labor. That productive labor was taken from the worker and redistributed to a non-worker.

• The Value of Productive Labor

The value of the electronic bytes that we send over the Internet is determined by mutual consent. The value of currency is actually nothing more than the total consensus of those who use it as a means of trade, sans tampering by the Federal Reserve.

That mutual consent, no longer based upon a standard of precious metal, is still — ultimately — driven by productive labor and the value of the stuff it produces.

The standard that endues money its value is the productive labor it represents. It doesn’t matter if the medium of exchange is beets, eggs, bits of gold, slips of paper with presidents’ heads printed thereon, or computer bytes. Productive labor is, ultimately, the underlying medium of exchange. When productive labor fails, economies fail.

Flag of the Soviet Union

Flag of the former Soviet Union (USSR)

The failure of Marxist theory in the old Soviet Union is that it squashed the profit motive that drives productive labor. When Russians stopped producing stuff, their economy floundered. It also explains why geographical regions such as Detroit and Haiti languish in economic depravity and disparity: The people who live in those areas are not efficient in productive labor.

Productive labor is now, and has always been, the medium of exchange. That medium of exchange can be rendered ineffective by government tampering, as it was in the Soviet Union, or by the innate inability of a population to produce goods through labor, as seen in Detroit and Haiti. Conservatives are correct to pin the blame on Marxism for the economic failure in the USSR. They are incorrect to pin the blame on Marxist dogma in Detroit and Haiti.

• Manipulating money with multiculturalism

Peoples of sub-Saharan Africa do not suffer in poverty for lack of natural resources. Rather, their economic failure is due to their inability to engage in productive labor.

The reason Mexico, Central America, and South America fall behind North America economically is because the people who populate those regions are not as competent in their ability to affect productive labor.

Note, for example, that the Falkland Islands have the highest standard of living in South America in spite of the fact that the islands have the highest cost of living. How is that possible? It is because the people who inhabit the islands are genetically predisposed to be more efficient and effective in intelligent productive labor. Think of the Falklands as an island of intelligence, or a bit of North America existing in South America.

The evidence is empirical and, therefore, logically undeniable: Some people groups engage in less efficient productive labor and, therefore, have less stuff. The disparity in living standards may not be caused by a lack of physical labor, but a deficiency in intellect that constrains both innovation and the ability to engage in the most efficient use of labor. In short, simple labor trumps laziness, productive labor trumps simple labor, and intelligent productive labor trumps mere productive labor.

Such thoughts are anathema to Marxism. Its moral sensitivities demand that we all should possess the same amount of stuff.

Marxism loathes economic disparities because it confuses disparities with depravities. The Marxist mantra is that the obliteration of disparity will erase depravity. Granted, such thinking is idiotic, but that’s what they believe. Still, Marxism can’t deny the obvious fact that certain people groups are innately more efficient at productive labor and are, therefore, wealthier.

A portrait of Karl Marx.

A portrait of Karl Marx

Though severely crippled in Russia, Marxism still prevails in the marketplace of ideas, particularly in the West. Void of reason or logic, it seeks to appeal directly to the innate altruism of the most productive people group — White people — by convincing us that using such phrases as “the most productive people group” — though painfully obvious — is somehow immoral. The quest of Marxism, then, is to displace our cognizance of reality through emotional mind manipulation. If Marxism can’t convert us intellectually, it will convert us emotionally. And it is succeeding.

The ideology of Marxist moralism thrives as cultural Marxism and serves as the gateway to economic Marxism.

• Thinking requires thinking

The ultimate Marxist objective is to erase economic disparity. There stands a seemingly insurmountable obstructive barrier that prevents Marxism from achieving its ideal of economic parity: Lots of smart White people.

Without the benefit of a deadly virus that would affect only peoples of European descent, Marxism favors an assault on the collective mindset of White folks.

Given its propensity for mind manipulation and comprehension of collectivist thought, Marxism has set about to dislodge the rational-thinking barrier from the masses of White Americans and replace it with reality-denying neurosis. And again … it is succeeding.

Marxism cannot effectively appeal to the intelligence of individual White people because its premise, as earlier noted, is blatantly idiotic. Rather, Marxism bypasses White intelligence and appeals to our emotional center which, when activated, nearly always overrides our intellect. The outcome is predictable: In spite of our intelligence, we respond like thoughtless, irrational dotes. We have, in fact, surrendered to the emotional appeal of Marxism.

• Protecting the productive class

The emotional bulldozers that raze the intellectual structures embedded in the brains of White Americans include guilt (White privilege), shame (often termed ‘white supremacy’), and dubiety (what Judge Learned Hand described as ‘that ever-gnawing inner doubt as to whether you’re right.’)

We have allowed the media to apply mental agitation to change our minds. We no longer think rationally … we think emotionally.

The reality that White people have delivered boatloads (literally) of innovation that has enhanced the lives of billions of Non-whites is never acknowledged. Why? Because that acknowledgement is a function of the intellect. Intelligence works against the Marxist mantra. The fact that the displacement of White innovation with the Marxist mantra will be devastating to Non-whites is never considered. Again, such thinking requires thinking. And thinking destroys Marxist myths.

[Read: It's A Wonderful Race]

• Relation between ego and economics

The most efficient bulldozer that displaces rational thinking among White Americans is often overlooked. It is Saul Alinsky’s Rule Number Four which states, “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

Our egos seldom operate concurrently with our intellects. Ridicule attacks our egos and prods us to take defensive postures that defy reason. White Americans would eagerly chuck Western culture under the bus rather than endure the humiliation of being falsely ridiculed as “racists”.

We fear and despise ridicule because its negative social ramifications are often severe. No one wants to associate with a person who is inflicted with social cholera. The effect of ridicule is stigmatization that isolates one from others and limits their influence. Hence the term, “cooties.”

The end analysis is that White Americans emotionally adapt to Marxism by adopting such nonsense as Affirmative Action and the multiple forms of government-forced integration that undermine the innovative productive labor that is the standard of our free-market economy.

• Applied intelligence trumps emotional manipulation

Our defenses include a simple awareness that emotionalism is a sorry replacement for intelligence, and that rational thinking is, in the end, superior to the recoil inherent to assaults on our egos through the ploy of ridicule.

It is incumbent upon us, and our prodigy, to defend both our freedom of association and our free market economy where the innovative and productive labor standard is the most efficient means to deliver prosperity, well-being, and enhanced lives to all.

To do otherwise is abject racism.  >http://dailykenn.blogspot.ca

(For added emphasis, all underlined, bolded words and links by ELN Editor)

Also Read:

“I Am a WHITE Man!”

“White Pride” DENIED Trademark

******************************

Understanding Money

Economic Plan of Germany’s NSDAP

In Defense of “Pale Males”

H/T to http://ozziesaffa.blogspot.co.nz/ who writes:

Actually, this brilliant article can apply to the USA, and every other country where Whites reside … just as much as it does to South Africa“.

by TAU Bulletin

The state of the nation is no more ludicrously evident than Gauteng premier Nomvula Mokonyane’s recent “warning” that “pale males” would return to government in Gauteng (1 of 9 provinces in South Africa) if SA’s opposition Democratic Alliance party wins next year’s provincial election.

“It can’t happen, it will not happen” she declared. “Reversals in transformation are unacceptable, and the Gauteng public must be spared the ‘white gevaar’ (danger)”.

[See: WHITE South Africans DENIED Jobs]

Where in the world are efficiency, skills, creativity and diligence seen as a danger? Only in South Africa, where so-called liberation credentials, party membership and loyalty trump the need to maintain the 1st world country and its infrastructure … which was handed to the ANC (African National Congress) on a plate after the 1994 election.

Ms. Mokonyane’s racial invective and resentment has been received with a muted tolerance. Despite the non-racial assurances in the Founding Provisions of South Africa’s constitution, the governing party’s racial diatribes against, mostly Whites, continues apace. Indeed, they seem to have increased.

The State President’s YouTube clip where he urges his supporters to “kill the boers” and that his cabinet would “kill with a machine gun” is still running, without any apparent move by YouTube to take it out of circulation. (Yet, a YouTube clip made by two White South Africans saying they refuse to apologize for being who they are … was taken off within a few days of its appearance on the internet.)

South Africa has two parallel universes – the ANC’s self-delusion, and that of reality. The fact that the country has dramatically slipped down the world’s various achievement indexes over the past 19 years, has either escaped Ms. Mokonyane’s notice, or she is disingenuous in the extreme.

Does the rather corpulent Ms. Mokonyane not realize that 90% of the food she and her countrymen consume is produced by “pale males”? That virtually everything she takes for granted in this country was created by “pale males”?

English: Taken by user:Guinnog

From where did the railways, roads, commercial farms, schools, hospitals, potable water and electricity transmission emanate? 

The very language she uses in a legislature — which is not part of her cultural heritage — is a language of the “pale male”. The newsprint that distributes her humbug is not of her culture either. But she is selective in her vitriol. When this lady shops, she hurries to the “pale males’” luxury shopping centers: she was recently seen at up-market Hyde Park “posing proudly with her R10 000 LK Bennet shoes and matching handbag”. (Tony Leon, Business Day 30.7.13). “Pale males” are excoriated, but they are good enough to produce and supply the luxuries which she, and her fellow ANTI-white friends, cannot live without.

There is no empirical evidence to show that without the intervention of “others” in Africa (including “pale males”), Ms. Mokonyane’s (African) culture would not have evolved any further than that of those “lost” tribes one finds in the Amazon and Papua New Guinea. She should be grateful that that particular ship sailed around the Cape of Good Hope many years ago, and that it decided to stop for victuals. Non-pale male groups who could have manned that ship may not have been so conciliatory to the locals, then and now.

Who created the Sasols, the Iscors, the Eskoms and the country’s nuclear capacity? Who rid the country of the tste tste fly and malaria? Who developed Africa’s premier agricultural and veterinary service, used by the whole continent? Who produces maize and other grain surpluses year after year on the continent that cannot feed itself?

And, conversely, who is busy destroying what used to be the African continent’s “pin-up” country?

Certainly not “pale males”. Ms. Mokonyane and her compatriots should look in the mirror. But if one’s modus vivendi is self delusion, then blame is the name of the game. The world has taken note of the Africa of today, and It is not a pretty picture.

Zimbabwe went from the continent’s bread basket to a basket case. Few, if any, of the continent’s governments can feed their people. Corruption, nepotism, inefficiency and venality are the order of the day. South Africa is no exception. Who is to blame for Liberia’s status as an African cesspool, or for Ethiopia’s failed state ranking? Colonialism? Apartheid? “Pale males”? Neither of these countries was subjected to colonialism or apartheid. They are travesties because the people who live there … are who they are.

South Africa today could certainly do with some “pale males” to put things right. But this is not the ANC’s priority: a deep racial inferiority complex trumps practicality.

The Facts

“Pale males” around the world are denounced by the non-achievers with relentless regularity. Whites in the United States complain about this, as well.

We quote Fred Reed from the US’s Nationalist Times:

“I am weary of the endless denunciation of ‘White privilege’; the calls to abolish all tests in which Whites excel, and the need to make universities and police forces, and advanced placement classes ‘look like American demographics’. It might be well to note, the utter dependence of the US on White men who have contributed virtually everything that keeps the affirmative-action classes from living in mud huts.”

Reed continues with examples of this contribution:

“Euclidean geometry, parabolic geometry, hyperbolic geometry and projective geometry. Physical chemistry, organic chemistry, biochemistry. Classical mechanics. The indeterminacy principle. The wave equation. The Parthenon. Air conditioning. Number theory. Romanesque architecture. Gothic architecture. Information theory. Entropy. Enthalpy. Almost every symphony ever written. Pierre August Renoir. The diatonic scale. The mathematics behind the twelfth root of two and all that. The Bohr-Sommerfeld atom. The purine pyrimidine structure of the DNA ladder. Single sideband radio. All other radio. Dentistry. The internal combustion engine. Turbojets, turbofans, Doppler beam-sharpening. Penicillin. Airplanes. Surgery. The mammogram. The Pill. The condom. Polio vaccine. The integrated circuit.“The computer, computational fluid dynamics. Euripides, Sophocles, Aristophanes, Homer. Glass. Rubber. Nylon. Roads. Buildings. Acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors. Silicone. The automobile. Bug spray. Public cryptography.”

“Like it or not, White men can do these things, have done them, and continue to do them. The evidence shows that all groups receiving affirmative action have not done them, and cannot do them, which is why they need affirmative action.

“The pattern of White men doing difficult things … continues. Consider the founders of companies in information technologies. Not quite all White, but all men. Anyone who watched the landing of Curiosity on the planet Mars will have noticed that Mission Control consisted overwhelmingly of White men. If I were rude, I would say to those who criticize: invent your own things.”

Reed cites South Africa as an example of a tragedy in the making. “A constantly dwindling number of Whites are at the mercy of a predatory welfare class, and it’s possible they can’t, and won’t carry the rest of the population. If things get worse for them, they will simply flee the country.”

Whether this scenario plays itself out in South Africa is up to the Whites. But Ms. Mokonyane mustn’t take too much for granted. Her dislike of “pale males” borders on the obsessive, to the point where common sense and practical considerations for the benefit of all South Africans are cast aside in an all-consuming and embittered realization that her ANC cannot feed its people, cannot govern, and are no better than what the world has seen emanate from the rest of the (African) continent over the past 50 years. She knows this, the ANC knows this, and the world knows it. Keeping out the “pale males” won’t improve the ANC. This racial animosity is inimical not only to Whites but, eventually, to the future of all South Africans.

The “pale male” acrimony is however selective. Ex-president Nelson Mandela was not interned in an ANC-run hospital. The new ANC elite have quietly bought houses in so-called White areas.

They send their children to White schools. They want the “pale male’s” education system. (Every university in South Africa is a White creation). What is the yardstick against which anything of worth in South Africa, is judged, if not, against a “pale male-created” yardstick? Are the elite’s suits bought from Nigeria … or Italy? Is there such a thing as a Ghanian IPod? Do they fly Air Kenya … or British Airways? Do they go to Mali for their holidays … or to Paris?

A South African business journalist refers to “the African No” – “a jumbled melee of endless meetings, unreturned phone calls and ignored e-mails”.

Compare this approach with the White world. The United States, for example, accounts for 4.5% of the world’s population, but 25% of the world’s GDP. When people flee their terrible countries they try for Europe, Australia and other “pale male” bastions. They don’t want to emigrate to Zambia or the Sudan.

A cursory trawl through South Africa’s productive sector sees “pale males” as police divers, as rescue helicopter pilots, as paramedics, as the donors to charities, as the bedrock of the taxpayer base, as the under-pinners of the medical profession, the service industry, the banking and the mining sector. The country is divided into the producers and the consumers, and we know on which side of the divide the “pale male” sits.

Virtually all of the productive farms that were handed over to ANC (African National Congress) supporters under the government’s land redistribution policy failed: a pithy example of “pale male” producers, and the ANC-created destruction.

It is a pity that more media space is not given to a frank analysis of who are the drivers of the South African economy, instead of, to those who talk about nationalization, about transformation, about White “racism” and so-called “privilege”.

South Africans might get a clearer picture of who is really important in the grand scheme of things, as opposed to those who can talk the leg off an iron pot, hold press conferences, fly all over the world first class, endlessly discuss turnaround strategies, and blame everyone, but themselves, for their own shortcomings.

Within ten years, South Africa’s social spending (including huge government employee wage bills) will exceed government revenue. Employee compensation as a share of government income went from 31.7% in 2008 to 44.3% in 2012. South Africa’s “pale males” are a finite group – even they cannot hope to foot the bill for this parasite profligacy forever. Maybe then, South Africa will value its “pale males”, but it may be too late.   >Source

(For added emphasis, Bold print, underlined words are by ELN Editor)

Also Read:

“I Am a WHITE Man!”

ANTI-white Brainwashing

White Males Need NOT Apply

“White Pride” DENIED Trademark

******************************

It’s a Wonderful Race (Part 1)

It’s a Wonderful Race (Part 2)

******************************

Blacks LESS Intelligent?

AFRICA – Not Our Problem

Stagnating Black Countries

************************

… other South African-related articles
under the “category” selection HERE.

S.O.S. – Saving Our Selves


 FOR us!

************************************************
AGAINST!

************************************************

***************************************************

Also Read:

Dispossessing  White Europeans

Our Land, Our Culture!

Telling It, Like It Is!

**************

Racial Diversity, NOT!

Racial Diversity – The CON Game

**************************

The Betrayal of Canada

The Betrayal of Canada

Ricardo Duchesne,
Professor of Sociology, UNB
Author of “The Uniqueness of Western Civilization

English: Flag of Canada over country contour F...

From Immigration Watch Canada

Last year, Maclean’s (Magazine July 9) had a front cover story “How Canadian Are You?” — bumptiously announcing that Canadians have earned the right to brag as a people with a great culture.

It offered an endearing “Canada Day Special” quiz for readers to determine how Canadian they were.

How much do you weigh? How many servings of veggies do you eat a day? How many times a week do you have sex? Should the NHL ban fighting? How many partial curl-ups do you do in one minute? If you scored between 20 and 25, you earned “bragging rights,” you are “a quintessential Canadian.” But if you scored between 5 and 9, you are lacking in “Canadian pride,” you are not in the right country.

This is what contemporary Canadian identity has become after five decades of mass immigration combined with endless pageants to multiculturalism. The idea that Canada has no other identity (other) than ethnic diversity has been encrypted into our brains starting with Pierre Trudeau’s announcement in Parliament in 1971:

English: Pierre Trudeau speaking at a fundrais...

Pierre Trudeau in Montréal, Québec.

“We believe that cultural pluralism is the very essence of Canadian identity. Every ethnic group has the right to preserve and develop its own culture and values within the Canadian context. To say we have two official languages is not to say we have two official cultures, and no particular culture is more ‘official’ than another.”

[Editor’s Note: The often-quoted Cicero stated over 2,000 years ago:

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
Cicero

According to Trudeau, every ethnic identity in the world is, and can become equally “Canadian“.

The British and the French are no more important to the making of Canada’s identity than the Chinese, Muslim, Mali, or Latino “Canadian”. “Racism and bigotry” were a “large part” of Canada’s “official” history and tradition as a European nation. This once-official view will no longer be tolerated.

The “White Canada” policy laid down in the Immigration Act of 1910, and extended in the Immigration Act of 1952 … ended in the Immigration Regulations of 1967, when a non-racial set of admission criteria was adopted.

According to those Regulations, the Act of 1952 was unpardonable. Today, few care to consider that the justification behind the “White Canada” immigration policy was the preservation and cementation of the primary role of Canada’s founding peoples of European origin. The idea that other peoples (who had taken no part in the settlement efforts and in the centuries-long creation of the institutions and infrastructure of Canada) might simply arrive in mass numbers to claim Canada as equally their own was anathema to Canadians before the establishment of multiculturalism.

The new 1967 immigration regulations emphasizing skill and education rather than ethnic origins were not brought on by popular demand, or even parliamentary debate and initiative, but by senior Ministers and Cabinet officials who did not trust the average Canadian to respond in a positive way on this issue (Hawkins, p. 63).

Gallup polls in the 1960s showed that only about one-third of Canadians thought that Canada should bring new immigrants, and over 60% thought that the fairly low levels of Asian immigration (at the time) were already too high.

This clip was taken when the City of Toronto was overwhelming White with few racial minorities (mostly Chinese):

In complete disregard to Canadian popular wishes, the borders of Canada were set wide open in the 1980s to immigrants from Asia, Africa, the Caribbean, Central and South America and the Middle East, under the directives of the major (political) parties, the media, tenured academic radicals, and business elites.

The number of immigrants coming each year into Canada since the early 1990s has been staggering, roughly 225, 000 and 260,000 immigrants per year … mostly from NON-European nations (85%+- NON-whites).

From 1981 to 2001, (Canada’s) visible-minorities increased more than threefold (almost 400%) from 1.1 million people, or nearly 5% of the population, to 4.0 million people, or 13% of the population.

By 2011 the foreign-born population of Canada stood at 20.6 per cent. Settling mostly in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver, immigrants have radically transformed the cultural composition and socio-ethnic dynamics of Canada’s major cities.

English: Toronto: Skyline, left side the Canad...

TORONTO – Canada’s Largest City

By 2017, it is expected that 50% of Toronto’s population will be immigrants, up from 44% in 2001.

In Vancouver, the proportion is projected to be 44%.

Other cities such as Calgary, Edmonton, Winnipeg, Saskatoon, Regina and Ottawa are also seeing their traditional European milieu changed by an ever rising tide of visible majorities.


Oh, Canada – Wake Up!

Today, the mainstream media (MSM), and the academic world take great pleasure in labelling our immigration policy prior to 1967 — as “racist and exclusionary”. But this is a cultural Marxist assessment of Canadian perceptions, their culture and ethnicity.

Canadians then, were part of a Western world committed and strongly attached to the idea that every individual citizen of Canada should be treated equally under the law without discrimination based on race, national origin, or religion. They were not “racist”, but merely ethnocentric — that is — a people with a natural and normal preference for their own ethnic traditions.

Ethnic groups throughout the world exhibit a preference for their own culture, and a disposition to judge other cultures by the standards of their own religion and customs. But today in the Western world, ethnocentrism is looked down upon as an attitude that contravenes the “universal brotherhood of humanity” to be manifested in Western multiethnic and multicultural societies.

As diverse ethnic groups come into contact with one another within Western countries, our liberal elites bow to the importance of “understanding” other cultures and overcoming one’s ethnic prejudices. Europeans still exhibiting strong attachments (to their age-old cultures) are said to be bogged down by “irrational fears”.

But recent scientific research shows otherwise: ethnocentrism is a healthy and practical evaluation of one’s ethnic identity and interests consistent with evolutionary theory and cultural sophistication. This is the argument ethnocentric individuals can opportunely take from a scientific paper published in Psychological and Cognitive Sciences (January 2011), with the fitting title: “Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism”. Written by a research team at the University of Amsterdam, directed by Dr. Carsten de Dreu, this article shows that oxytocin is a human molecule associated with in-group favoritism and out-group derogation.

Through a series of experiments in which participants were administered doses of oxytocin, the researchers learned that “a key mechanism facilitating in-group cooperation is ethnocentrism, the tendency to view one’s group as centrally important and as superior to other groups” at the expense of an out-group.

How, then, did European Canadians come to accept the idea that it is “racist” and “xenophobic” to exhibit preference for one’s own ethnicity and heritage, while believing, at the same time that every NON-European ethnic group has a right to preserve its own culture inside Canada?

How did Canadians come to believe that their identity can be proudly captured in answers to such banal Macleans (Magazine) questions as “How many rooms does your house have per person?” There is no space here to address these questions. Suffice it to respond — to those who claim that multiculturalism was in origins and essence a “quintessentially Canadian” idea and policy — that the relentless promotion of diversity and mass immigration, despite some variations, has been a Western-wide phenomenon since the 1960s.

The American President Lyndon B Johnson signed the Immigration Act of 1965, which led to a tremendous surge in immigration from Mexico and Asia in the decades that followed. Eight years later the “White Australia Policy” came to an end, resulting in a massive influx of ethnocentric Asians.

Western European nations have also seen their cultures awash in immigration and diversity. The British Nationality Act of 1948 affirmed the right of Commonwealth citizens (including those of newly independent Commonwealth countries like India) to settle in the United Kingdom.

Commonwealth immigration rose from 3,000 per year in 1953 to 46,800 in 1956 and 136,400 in 1961 Some restrictions were introduced in the 60s and 70s including the British Nationality Act, which required migrants to have a “substantial connection with the United Kingdom” by birth or ancestry to a UK national.

Nevertheless, in the 1970s, averages of 72,000 immigrants were settling in the UK every year from the Commonwealth; and in the 1980s and early 1990s around 54,000 per year, rising to around 97,000 by 1999. About half the population increase in Britain between the 1991 and 2001 censuses was due to foreign-born immigration.

By 2012, White British had dropped (from 87.5% of the population in 2001) to ONLY 80.5%.

White Britons in London — in 2012 – accounted for less than half (44.9%) of its population, and more than one in three London residents is foreign-born. As the country was flooded with immigrants, diversity was strenuously enforced through incessant media campaigns including the transformation of the entire curriculum from pre-kinder onwards away from any historic pride in the British heritage. Similar changes have been brought by liberal elites in France, Spain, Italy, Sweden, Denmark, and increasingly as well in Norway, Switzerland, and Ireland.

[See: Perils of Racial Diversity]

Some will argue that these changes were “sensible” components of worldwide trends toward “globalization”, free trade and free capital mobility. The fact is that if economic globalization was naturally accompanied by the “free” mobility of people, then we should have also seen major demographic-ethnic changes in Asia, and the world generally.

Asia’s now advanced economies have seen international trade, investment and finance represent ever growing portions in their economies, but in total contrast to the countries of North America and Europe, Asia has not seen migrants grow as a share of its population. In fact, immigrants have accounted for a mere 1.4-1.6% of Asia’s population over the past 20 years. Moreover, contrary to the argument that immigration has been a necessity brought on by low fertility rates and ageing of the populations of the West, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and other Asian countries have fertility rates below replacement, even lower than Canada’s and some of Europe’s countries: at 1.4, 1.2, 1.2, and 1.1 respectively. And the proportions of their populations above the age of 65 are very high and rising.

The question thus stands: Why are European-created nations the only ones experiencing mass immigration and multiculturalism? Some may point to the youth-centered counterculture emerging in the 1960s questioning the values of anyone over thirty — that is to say — the values of the silent majority of Canadians who felt comfortable with the Immigration Act of 1952.

Writers, actors, and producers across the West, whether in fiction, theatre, or film, broke old taboos against sexual explicitness, graphic violence, homosexuality, and divorce. The civil rights movement in the United States, exotic guerilla movements in the Third World, Aboriginal Rights, Quebec nationalism, opposition to the war in Vietnam, and the complete takeover of Canada’s universities by cultural Marxists, were components of the 1960s political atmosphere.

However, if I had to choose one reason why Western countries decided to negate their European heritage and ethnicity, I would say it was the twin ideologies of universalism and egalitarianism. By universal egalitarianism, I mean the idea that humans are essentially the same everywhere, and that our ethnicities and cultural ancestries are either superficial, or easy to transform through proper instruction in the acquisition of modern “universal values” such as civic equality, tolerance, affluent civility, and democratic participation.

The notion that the liberal elites in the West represented the highest ideals of humanity had become conventional thinking in the 60s. The West was ahead of other cultures in the institutionalization of these universal values; it was the moral obligation of Western elites to showcase these values to the world. Humanity could be united under these values with different ethnic groups co-existing and interbreeding in the same lands in an atmosphere of liberal affluence.

These ideas preceded the 1960s with roots going back to the Enlightenment and perhaps even Christianity. The senior government officials who introduced non-racial immigration rules in Canada in the 1960s were influenced by the ideas which led to the creation of the United Nations and a multiracial Commonwealth.

The UN Declaration of Universal Human Rights in 1948, the UNESCO statements on race (1950, 1951, 1964, 1967), with their language about a common humanity, which arose directly from the experience of Nazism, made some politicians uncomfortable with a Canada acting on the world stage as a democratic and liberal nation while excluding non-Whites from its borders. The Immigration Act of 1952 seemed old, exclusionary, and illiberal.

This love for a future non-ethnocentric humanity, projected onto a benign future that was not real, entailed a growing dislike and intolerance for the actual Canadian population of European ethnic origin. In 1971, this European population constituted about 96% of Canada’s demography. This existing European population still sympathized with Mackenzie King’s 1947 announcement in the House:

“The people of Canada do not wish, as a result of mass immigration, to make a fundamental alteration in the character of our population. Large-scale immigration from the Orient would change the fundamental composition of the Canadian population.”

But liberal elites, as the radical 1960s spread, were determined to re-engineer the souls of average Canadians. There was no national debate on multiculturalism and mass immigration. Canadian immigration policy proceeded, for the most part, by way of non-transparent regulations, executive directives, and administrative discretion … not by legislative action.

Immediately after Trudeau’s 1971 announcement, numerous programs were implemented:  multicultural grants, ethnic development programs, funds for the writing of the NON-European ethnic histories, support for Canadian ethnic studies “to set the record straight” by reflecting Canada’s diverse cultural traditions and the contributions of non-British and non-French to Canada’s identity and history. All ethnic groups were to be seen as equal to the making of Canada. Never mind the actual historical and political fact of the two founding peoples of Canadian Confederation!!!

With grants freely available, there was, in the words of one observer, an “explosion of academic research into ethnicity.” Between 1971 and 1982, 88 scholarly works on cultural minorities were published in Canada, as well as numerous collections of papers ; many symposiums on Canadian ethnic groups and relations were held. A new discipline, “Canadian Ethnic Studies,” was born, soon to proliferate throughout the halls of academe. This was just the beginning of a “bonanza of remarkable proportions” in the promotion of multiculturalism through every level of society.

In June 1984, the Conservative Leader Brian Mulroney told a cheering crowd that his party now stood for multiculturalism and would not allow itself to be called “the Party of White Anglo-Saxon Protestants”. Multicultural diversity — he said — was an absolutely obligatory part of Canada’s national identity and to reject it … was to reject Canada.

He then outlined future changes his party intended to implement in the hiring policies of the federal government, services in non-official languages, more funds for the preservation and advancement of NON-European cultures and greater efforts to “stamp out racism wherever it rears its ugly head.”

This stamping out was directed singularly against the British people and their legacy in Canada. The French in Quebec had successfully managed to portray themselves — from the 1960s onwards — as an oppressed minority within Canada with its own legitimate identity seeking a new constitutional deal framed against Anglo Canada. It was the British, and then the Europeans who had assimilated to English Canada, who were being asked to relinquish any sense of culture deeply grounded in ethnic bonds, ancestry, and homeland.

The ethnicity of Quebecers, and of Native peoples, could be viewed in primordialist terms as deeply rooted in their lands, communities, histories, and customary identities. But normal British and English Europeans were prohibited from binding themselves to a geographical and cultural “homeland”.

Their ethnicity was to be de-linked from a homeland called “Canada”. There was no such a thing as a Canadian identity that could be linked primordially to the British or the English-Europeans. The European-Canadian identity was to be witnessed only in multicultural tolerance, pluralist values, democracy, and diversity. But since these values were “universal” — for “humanity” – they would not be seen as uniquely British or European.

To the contrary, these values would be used against any British sense of identity for the sake of protecting and promoting the ethnic pride of NON-Europeans.

Asians, Blacks, and Latinos had the right to preserve their own ethnic roots and culture in a “multicultural” Canada. They would have hyphenated identities such as “I am really Chinese, but I live in mosaic Canada,” or “I have ethnic Chinese roots, but I identify with Canadian diversity and democracy.”

Since the British were allegedly the agents of “racist” and exclusionary immigration practices, and whereas the immigrants (including the millions who were not yet in Canada) were the “victims” of such practices … multiculturalism, thus worked necessarily as a force against British identity, and as a force for non-European identities.

To this day — every day — media pundits and self-righteous academics insist that “racism” is experienced by immigrants of visible status, and that a “major goal of multiculturalism must be to eliminate racism.”

Forget that visible immigrants come from illiberal, racially ranked, and backward cultures, and that individual rights and non-racial discrimination policies were unique legacies of the British, and that visible immigrants in Canada are far more uncomfortable with other visible groups, than are European Canadians.

The point is … that “racism” per se, has been inexorably tied to the ethnocentrism of British/European Canada, and so the elimination of “racism” requires the eradication of British and European identity. Some iconic symbols and practices such as the maple leaf, hockey players, and calendar photographs of Lake Louise may be allowed. The Maclean’s ‘Canadian’ “with bragging rights” should ask for no more.

Perhaps on Canada Day, rather than celebrating the dispossession of European Canadians and their transformation into “quintessentially” deracinated characters, we should critically examine the unfounded notion that European ethnocentrism, and only European ethnocentrism, amounts to “ethnic cleansing”, “fanaticism,” and “violence” against outsiders (Kelley and Trebilock, p. 471).

Japan, Korea, and many other countries, have a very high degree of ethnic homogeneity, as do some Nordic European countries (Finland, Norway, and also Switzerland), but none of them are engaged in wars of exclusion and violence against other ethnic groups.

Ending mass immigration and multiculturalism in the West is not an act of exclusion and racism. It is the other way around : these policies have amounted to acts of exclusion and dispossession against the historic British and European peoples of Canada. Our cooperative nature is intrinsically connected to our in-group nature. Ethnocentrism means loyalty and commitment for one’s group; it does not entail “hatred” and “rancour” against other groups. The scientists Carsten de Dreu et al. observe 2011), in fact, that the tendency for in-group members is to favour their own rather than to hate outsiders:

“[T]here is good reason to believe that the in-group prejudice effect is far more basic to human life than is the out-group hate prejudice effect, and research on human ethnocentrism supported this positive-negative asymmetry of social discrimination. “

The multiculturalists are the ones who have infused politics with an intolerant ideology in which anyone proud of his European heritage, and refusing to join the multiculti choruses … is despised as a “xenophobic” outsider. The irony of creating a “universal humanity” is that it has required the dehumanization of the British people, or any other particular European group, wishing to retain its identity.

Multiculturalists advocate in-group favoritism for immigrants and cultural Marxists, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, out-group hate for those Canadians who love their European heritage.

They have demonized the European founding peoples of Canada as an out-group, an enemy of “humanity”, to be eradicated for the sake of NON-European “diversity”, and the creation of a new species inside Canada and the West.

Their position runs counter to the natural, healthy and rational ethnocentric prejudices of humans. It also runs counter to the actual ethnic diversity of the peoples of the earth. Why would the Japanese, Koreans, and Pakistanis want their countries to look like “diverse” Toronto?

Let us defend European ethnocentrism in the name of human nature and the true diversity of the peoples of the planet.  >Immigration Watch Canada

(For added emphasis,  underlined Bolded words and links are by ELN Editor)

http://www.dailystormer.com/council-of-european-canadians-an-excellent-website-in-defense-of-the-people-and-culture-of-the-west/

Also Read:

“Useful Idiots”

How To Destroy a Nation

Importing BLACK Violence

Importing Jamaican “Culture”

Canada’s BLACK Population

*************************

Police Surrender To “Diversity”

Canadians Betrayed By Politicians

White People Under Relentless Attack

Historical WHITE Slavery Revealed

From Resisting Defamation

If an ANTI-white American teacher or professor mentions some destructive effects of European exploration and settlement in the Western Hemisphere without mentioning the lessons that indigenous White Europeans received in destruction at the hands of Mongols, Turks, and Arabs for 900 years PRIOR to, and simultaneously with, the great European explorations in the 1400s, 1500s, 1600s, and 1700s,… then remind them about the great invasions, and their likely influence, on the mind-set of (today’s) Europeans.

Taizu, better known as Genghis Khan. Portrait ...

Taizu, better known as Genghis Khan.

A critical tactic by white-hating people is “clock-setting” or “clock-starting.” This means that any narrative, or story about history, has a beginning point which is always arbitrary, and serves to deceive readers about history by selecting a beginning point that disadvantages one or another of the narrative’s participants.

An excellent example appeared on the 01/02/03 CounterPunch website in an essay by a professor of economics at Northeastern University named M. Shahid Alam. The relevant part is in the sixth paragraph which engages in “clock-starting” in 1492, as follows:

“Starting in 1492, the guns of the West have been pointed incessantly outward. For more than five hundred years, the steel of the Western sword, lance, gun and bomb have been planted in the bones and flesh of Africans, Australians, Asians and native Americans….Over 500 years, entire continents were devastated, societies over-thrown, their civilizations denigrated, their peoples decimated, herded into slavery and stranded without dignity.”

This is the Big Lie version of world history that is taught today at most universities and high schools in the USA. Professor Alam resolutely ignores the dangers and destructions facing White indigenous Europeans and cultures from the Asian-based Mongols, Asian-based Turks, and Asian- and African-based Arabs during the same time period.

Diverse White European cultures faced destruction many times before, and since 1492, but those parts of history are concealed by dishonest professors like Professor Alam whose only interest is in promoting a debased picture of White European histories, diversities, cultures, and societies that magically commenced in 1492. Incidentally, “1492” and “five hundred years” are frequently code words that identify the Alam historical narrative.

The campaign of defamation against the diverse White American peoples has included the suppression in high schools and colleges, of knowledge about the invasions of Europe within historical memory, each of which had a profound and continuing impact on the shared perceptions of the diverse White American peoples. Young White Americans never learn of these profound influences on their histories, heritages, cultures, and diversities in our public schools.

For example, research reveals that the anti-Asian sentiment in California in the mid-1800s, included vivid memories of the great invasions and destruction of homes, hometowns, churches, states, and people by the Mongol Empire which wasn’t finally crushed until the time of Catherine the Great of Russia — when George Washington was president.

Catherine the Great - the most famous Russian ...

Catherine the Great – the most famous Russian Empress of German descent

True history would include the long-lasting and historically recent Mongol, Turkish, and Arab invasions into Europe that shaped the indigenous White European perceptions of each of the three peoples, and continues to frame those perceptions among many diasporic White Americans.

One centuries-long series of brutal militaristic invasions into Europe was the North African-based Arab, Berber, and Turkish incursions and slave-takings for 700 years in Southern and Western Europe that only ended in 1492.

Given that the generally ANTI-European and ANTI-Christian bias in Wikipedia, the reader may find there, a moderately accurate account of the Battle of Tours in 732 which marked the farthest invasion of Western Europe by Arabs.

MILLIONS of Spanish, Portuguese, French, Italian, and Sicilian peoples were slaughtered, or enslaved and sold at slave markets in Africa and Asia. There were no fewer than 4 major bloody Arab and Berber crusades into Southern Europe during this period.

Also — for centuries — Turkish warlords on the North African coast indulged in massive slave-taking operations and massacres of indigenous European peoples from Ireland, England, Scotland, Iceland, and all along the Adriatic, North Atlantic, and North Mediterranean coasts.

American shipping in the early years of the American republic was also oppressed by the Turkish warlords dwelling among the Arabs and Berbers along the North African coast.

A 2nd – centuries-long series — of plundering and butchering crusades was by the Asian Mongols and lasted for 550 years in Eastern and Central Europe.

Millions of Europeans were slaughtered or sold at slave markets in Asia. These invasions did not completely end until around the end of the American war for independence when Catherine the Great of Russia wiped out the last Mongol-installed khanate (kingdom) on the Crimean peninsula in 1783.

Dozens of European principalities and cities were destroyed by Mongol armies as they converted the populated plains and river basins of East and Central Europe into grazing grounds for horses and cattle.

More Europeans were killed by Mongols than those killed by Stalin, Hitler, and Napoleon combined. (You may also include Eisenhower, Roosevelt & Churchill in that group – ELN Editor)

The viciousness of the Mongol invasions is shown by the fact that they engaged in the first recorded biological warfare. European merchants at trading posts on the coast of the Black Sea were driven out when Mongols hurled dead bodies of victims of the Bubonic Plague (the Black Death) over the trading post walls. When the traders retreated to Venice, the Bubonic Plague accompanied them and led to death by disease of up to 50% of all Europeans in the mid-1300s.

A 3rdcenturies-long series — of marauding and vicious militaristic crusades into Europe was the Asian Turkish invasions and slave-takings in Central Europe for 500 years that ended only about 90 years ago with the collapse of imperial Turkey into its present boundaries. These imperialist crusades took the Turkish empire all the way to the coast of Italy and the walls of Vienna. (More) millions of Europeans were enslaved and sold at slave auctions in North Africa and Southwest Asia.

(Again), given the generally ANTI-European and ANTI-Christian bias in Wikipedia, the reader may find there a moderately accurate account of the Battle of Vienna in 1529 which marked the farthest invasion into Central Europe by Turks.

One depraved feature of the Turkish empire was the frequent slave roundup (“child levy“) throughout the Slavic nations, as far north as the city walls of Moscow and Warsaw. These were no simple, mercantile affairs like the Asian Arab slave-taking expeditions hundreds of miles into the east coast of Africa. These were well-financed and state-run roundups (child-stealing) of young Europeans (often followed by the murder of their parents). >Source


A short 50 minute history lesson you were never taught in school.

Also Read:

North American WHITE Slavery

Untold Story of WHITE Slavery

Related articles

Rise & Fall of Germany

We have come a long way! Let’s not despoil our culture and our heritage by the ruination of enforced multi-racialism (multiculturalism) being imposed on our White nations. Before reading further, please enjoy this short musical video in appreciation our own European cultures and heritages.

[Percentage (%) of the remaining WHITE PEOPLE in the world?   ANSWER]

************************************************************

[Editor's Note: The following excerpts, taken in no particular order ... are from this essay originally written about 10 years ago in the German language, then translated into English.  To absorb the full impact of the message, it's recommended that you read the essay in its entirety by clicking onto the above link.

The onus is upon the reader to conduct their own research to confirm the veracity of the claims presented here.]

[...]

It’s not only about German contributions to the world at large, it’s also about the present-day annihilation of the German people as such, about the incessant vilification and character assassination which takes place in the world.

I have tried to point some of it out, only being able to scratch the surface. The ‘Hate-everything German‘ is so all-inclusive as to be mind-numbing, and quite frankly,  is comprehensible only when understanding the Jewish hate which has poisoned the minds of man for centuries.

[Important Video:  http://trutube.tv/video/2016/The-Jewish-Final-Solution-to-Germans-and-Other-Gentiles

This horrible, irrational hatred is directed against all peoples of German blood, whether they be Germans, or Scandinavians, or ethnic Germans living the world over. This is so grotesquely successful that ethnic Germans world-wide are literally afraid to defend their good name.

Did you know that about 27% of all Americans are ethnic Germans?

Did you know that in 300 years of living in America … no German family has ever owned a slave?

Did you know that in Philadelphia in 1686, German immigrants openly held a protest march against slavery? Not the Italians, not the French, not the Spanish, certainly not the English, and most decidedly not any Jews protested against slavery. It was us Germans who protested against slavery, while it was the Jews who sold slaves.

Did you know that the entire slave trade was in Jewish hands, including the ownership of the ships, the ships crews and the ships’ captains?   No, not the Portuguese … but rather Jews who lived in Portugal.   Not the Dutch … but rather Jews (including one by the name of Roosevelt!) who lived in Holland, etc. etc.   NEVER a German, and neither as seller, nor as customer.

Did you know that the original Declaration of Independence was printed in the German language in Philadelphia … 3 years before being printed in English? Did you know that, we Germans, introduced the printing press to the USA?

Did you know that Johann Gutenberg, the inventor of the printing press, was named the most important person in the last one thousand years?

Did you know that the most important and influential thinkers and philosophers of the past 200 years were largely German?

Did you know that the south of Chile and Brazil were settled by Germans some 150 years ago? Did you know that in 1939 (2 yrs. before American military hostilities began),  Brazilians were encouraged by the USA to hunt down German settlers and lynch them? Those were Germans in ethnicity only.

They had lived there for almost 100 years, having contributed hugely and never having in any manner whatsoever been a problem. Their language was almost totally wiped out at that time at the instigation of the Roosevelt government, which at that very time, claimed to be ‘neutral’.  A time when Germany was diplomatically desperately trying to avert war. What does that tell us about the cowards of Brazil?

Did you know it was the British military historian, Cpt. Liddell B. Hart, who wrote in his book “The History of the Second World War”: ‘WW2 would have been avoided had it not been for the intransigence of the British government.’ – Did you know that Liddel B. Hart’s career was subsequently torpedoed at every turn by the Powers-To-Be in England?

We know whom [Winston] Churchill wanted to annihilate (and damn near did), because he himself said in 1936 (!): The Germans are getting too strong. We must wipe them out.’

Did you know the 1936 Olympic games in Berlin were the best organized, most orderly, most fair and totally untainted games in history? Did you know that (Negro) American star athlete Jesse Owens waxed enthusiastically about the great treatment he had received there … while at home he had to sit in the back of the bus?

Did you know that the infamous snub of Jesse Owens by Adolf Hitler is an unmitigated lie?  And, that Hitler was told by the president of the International Olympic committee to please NOT congratulate anyone personally — that this was against the rules — and that Hitler apologized for having done so the previous day, and promised not to do it again?

African-American Jesse Owens on the podium aft...

African-American Jesse Owens on the podium after winning the long jump at Germany’s 1936 Summer Olympics.

Did you know that Hitler smiled broadly at Jesse Owens, and waved at him during the victory celebrations? That this is recounted by Jesse Owens, himself, in his memoirs … that neither Owens, nor any other member of the American Olympic team had anything … but good things to say about Germany.

That the only people who have written negatively about these magnificently staged games have been bought and paid for journalistic hacks and scum-bags, most all of them Jews who weren’t even in Berlin at the time … that the English team entering the Berlin Olympic Stadium gave the German salute (now wrongly vilified as the Nazi salute)?

Did you know that this salute is Roman in origin, and it means Look here, I am unarmed, I come as a friend? What does the Communist salute with the CLOSED fist represent? Do you see the Jew-defamation at work? Why does anyone have to draw a road-map here??

The truth is, during the years 1870 to 1945, international students flocked to German universities. [...]  To be accepted to a German university in ANY discipline … was like hitting the Jack-Pot. Want to study chemistry? Well, Germany of course. Want to study medicine? Well, Germany if you can pass the entrance exam, of course, etc., etc..

Toward the end of the 19th century, Chile imported 3,000 German teachers. The result was the best educated population in South America. They didn’t import English or French teachers. They didn’t import Spanish teachers, even though belonging to the Spanish sphere of influence. They imported GERMAN teachers, even though they had to teach them Spanish [language] first, at their expense, while paying them a good wage and all costs! Why? Because the German system of education was acknowledged word-wide to be by far the best.

Let’s start with some things, we Germans, have enriched the world with:

Did you know that your “Hot Dog” comes from Germany?

Did you know that your “Hamburger” comes from Germany?

Did you know that your all-American “Apple Pie” comes from Germany?

Did you know that your beer brewing industry was founded exclusively by Germans? Miller, Pabst Blue Ribbon, Strohs, Hamms, Budweiser, Henry Weinhardt’s, Coors, Michelob, Lowenbrau, you name it – all German in origin.

Did you know that Oscar Meyer of meat-packing fame, was German? The finest meat-packing companies in South America are those from the South of Chile, purely of German origin … going back 150 years!

Did you know that the greatest American car ever built, the mighty Duesenberg was designed & built by a German?

Did you know that the most famous Japanese car ever built, the Datsun 240 Z was designed by Albrecht Goertz … a German designer?

Did you know that the most revolutionary Japanese motorcycle of all time, the Suzuki Katana of 1980 …was designed by a design studio in Germany?

Did you know that Porsche Design redesigned & thereby saved your American icon, the Harley-Davidson [motorcycle]?  Harley-Davidson, on their own, was going broke. After the Porsche re-work … it has become one of the most recognized names in the motorcycle world.

Did you know that the entirety of NASA was founded by German engineers and is based on German technology? That the moon rocket of 1969 was a grandson of the famed V2 rocket of Germany and that all space exploration is based on the German model?

One often hears TV reporters waxing eloquently about the now defunct Russian MIR space station, while assiduously ignoring the fact that it’s based on German technology, and that the German engineers who were kidnapped by the Russians were worked to death. None of them ever saw their families again. Must not embarrass our former allies now, must we? But abusing the Germans is a safe bet.

Did you know that Germany has been robbed of about 45% of its territories, including some of the most spectacularly beautiful cities in the world during the past century?

Did you know that during WW2, the German Waffen-SS accepted a British request for a temporary cease-fire during the ferocious battle at Arnheim 1944, and that the British had run out of hospital space and medications, and asked the Germans to take care of their wounded?

Also read:   Luftwaffe Pilot Spared B-17 Pilot’s Life

Did you know that British and American bombers strafed and bombed German submarines engaged in rescue operations? But that not a single solitary German aircraft ever did anything, even remotely this despicable?

Did you know that AFTER WW2  about 5,000,000 ( 5 MILLION) German civilians were murdered by the Poles, the Czechs, the Russians, the Serbs, the Croatians, the Jews and the Slovenians without a single person ever even having been indicted?

Did you know that there were dozens of concentration camps in Poland after WW2 … all administered and run by Jews who murdered without restraints?

Did you know that Hungary was ruled by a Jewish junta after WW1 headed by a murderer named Bela Kuhn (Cohen), whose specialty it was to ram a ruler down the throats of those who didn’t agree with him?, who flayed (skinned alive) dozens of political ‘enemies’? Just a little tidbit of Jewish history here – sorry, couldn’t resist!

Did you know that Poland attempted to have one (post-war) Jewish concentration camp commander — known to have been a mass murderer — extradited from Israel, but that Israeli authorities adamantly refused?

Did you know that after the war, about one million German soldiers were murdered by the Americans under the direction of Dwight Eisenhower via starvation, unchecked diseases, lack of shelter and neglect, while Europe at large was awash in food and medical supplies?

[U.S. General EISENHOWER was the real mass murderer ... HERE.]

Did you know that under British occupation, the infant mortality rate in German cities after WW2 was upward of 20%, and that Germans were ‘fed’ as little as 400 calories per day? And that it requires about 1250 calories a day to stay alive?

Did you know that the most famous bowling balls and equipment, Brunswick, are of German origin and that ‘Brunswick’ is the English name for ‘Braunschweig’?

Did you know that the popular sport of bowling has its origins in Germany?

Did you know that Aerobics were developed by a German doctor, specializing in physical therapy during the 1920’s?  That it was originally called “Zandern”, after its developer, Dr. Zander?

Did you know that ketchup was invented by “Heinz-Foods”, a company founded by a German?

Did you know that the most famous piano industries worldwide are of German origin? : Steinweg, Steinway (the German Steinweg in English speaking countries), Knabe, Sohmer, Wurlitzer, Bluethner, Boesendorfer (Austrian), Bechstein, Schimmel, Schiedmeyer, Forster and the list is literally endless. During the first part of the 20th Century, Germany had over a thousand piano manufacturers (no, I am not exaggerating!), all of whom built quality instruments.

Did you know that the accordion is a German invention of 1821. It was invented by a German instrument maker as a piano-replacement which could be taken along on long voyages aboard sail-powered ships. Can anyone imagine French, Italian or Mexican folk music without an accordion?

Did you know that the Bandion (a relative of the accordion) is the invention of a German instrument maker? Can anyone imagine the Argentine Tango without a Bandion?

Did you know that the clarinet is a German invention. Symphony music, most folk music as well as Jazz music are unthinkable without the clarinet. Did you know that the clarinet is the father of the Saxophone family of instruments?

Did you know that the famous instrument maker, American Wurlitzer of jukebox fame is of German origin? Did you know Wurlitzer designed the first electric keyboard long before the Japanese even thought about one?

Did you know that not so long ago — when America was still civilized — almost every American home had a Wurlitzer Piano in the parlor?

Did you know that the art of beer-brewing was introduced to the Japanese by WW1 German prisoners-of-war around 1916?

Did you know that bread-baking was introduced to Japan by that self-same group of German prisoners-of-war?

Did you know that the automobile was invented — by what later became Mercedes Benz … a German company?

Did you know that Walter P. Chrysler (Kreisler) was German?

Did you know that, we Germans, are the nation who fathered Professor Ferdinand Porsche? Ya, that one. The guy who built those sports cars.

Did you know that the Boeing family — of airplane fame — is German?

How about Herbert Hoover, the most humanitarian president the Americans have ever had? His grandfather’s name was ‘Huber’. I am convinced that one of the reasons he is being maligned today is because he was a German ethnicity.

Did you know that the seeds of Hate-the-Germans’ were sown by, not only the Jews, but by the British Empire bent on destroying Germany?

Did you know that the motorcycle is a German invention of 1885?

Did you know that the country with the most motorcycles in circulation was Germany (over a million in 1935), that Germany’s DKW was the worlds largest motorcycle manufacturer? That the Japanese motorcycle industry today is based on German patents … most of which, were shamelessly stolen?

Did you know that Hitler-era Germany was the first and only country in the world to truly consider the environment? This was based on the German love of nature, which in turn is based on ancient Teutonic religious beliefs.

They furnished full employment to its people (real jobs, not like today’s MickeyMouse make-believe minimum wage garbage at McDonalds), a complete health care-system for everyone, they practically outlawed interest on bank loans. Bank loans were permitted only for major purchases. It was prohibited to mortgage farms. Farming land thereby not only assured the farmers a decent income, but a farm could never be foreclosed on. The result was the most stable, advanced and productive farming community in the world.

The Hitler government traded (bartered) internationally rather than to buy, thereby outmaneuvering the international money sharks (the Jews, for those of you who still haven’t gotten it), to say ‘You have the obligation to work’, rather then the ‘right to work’ and the list of outstanding social policies is literally endless. The end result was zero-unemployment, zero discontent, no beggars or homeless people.

Germany, without Jews, shot forward like a moon rocket. The improvements were absolutely incredible on all levels. Hitler’s government was the only one in history to receive an approval rating of over 95% by the population at large! This approval rating was voluntarily given and has never been questioned by anyone!

While the population in the United States was standing in soup-lines, while the entire west was suffering the most catastrophic economic conditions in history, while France, England, Poland and all the rest were suffering economic downturns of massive proportions … Germany was building luxury cruise liners for its people, airships without equal, unequaled road systems, the finest symphony halls and art museums, world-beating race cars and motorcycles, and an entirely independent nation, the first in history!

***********************************************

Berlin, Germany utterly destroyed May, 1945

The sciences flourished, as did medicine, music, architecture, art and sculpture. No nation on earth can point to any period in its history where the same could be said.   All of it on its own! - AND ALL OF IT, WITHOUT JEWS!  That’s the bottom line, folks … like it or not.   >see the Full Report.

For further studies on this subject matter:
http://justice4germans.wordpress.com/

and

http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/welcome.html

******************************************************

ALSO READ:

German Truth Be Told

Tears For Dresden

Dresden’s 14 Hours of Hell
***************************
German “Ethnic Cleansing”
Suppressed Post-War History

Post WWI DELIBERATE German Starvation

**********************************
The Unknown GERMAN Holocaust

Luftwaffe Pilot Spared B-17 Pilot’s Life

H/T to http://hardons-blog.blogspot.co.uk/

Paul Eisen’s Blog

By Paul Eisen

Oh, how I wish I could stop posting David Duke (it gets me into no end of trouble).

[The] trouble is … he just will NOT stop telling the truth.

Come on David … give a Jew a break!

See his controversial, posted VIDEO.

 

 

Economic Plan of Germany’s NSDAP

Historian Rodney Martin of the World View Foundation narrates an English translation of the Germany’s National Socialist Economic Plan (1932) to rescue and restore Germany’s economy so to:

– Put the German population back to work — to increase production and prosperity for the people — to halt usury, exploitation, foreign speculation and interference in the economy — and to increase independence, etc.

Colour Photos of a prosperous and care-free 1930s Berlin under command of the NSDAP while Britain and the United States were still suffering in the midst of the economic depression.

Mr. Martin simultaneously compares and contrasts what happened in the Weimar Republic with what is happening in the USA in 2012.

Website: http://wvfoundations.org/

A copy of the English translation of this document can be downloaded here in pdf format
http://archive.org/download/RodneyMartin-TheEconomicPlanOfTheNsdap/nsdap_1932…

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 Video
http://trutube.tv/video/1015/The-Truth-Concerning-the-Third-Reich

Also Read:

Eisenhower’s Death Camps AFTER WWII

Luftwaffe Pilot Spared B-17 Pilot’s Life

The Unknown German Holocaust

Suppressed Post-War History

****************************

German Truth Be Told

http://notimeforsilence.wordpress.com/adolf-hitler/

Our Land, Our Culture!

By Rufus

Traditional English Folk Culture has been all but destroyed, as it has been legally forced to give way to alien cultures, multi-Culturalism is a lie.  For an (indigenous) culture to live, it must be protected and nurtured.  No two Cultures can co-exist without one being destroyed.

Clock tower and the British parliament in Lond...

British parliament in London.

In the case of European Culture, the Governments of Europe have criminalised our ways and forced us to tolerate that which destroys us.  Enough is enough!  Let us say “no” to the Multi-Cultists and the globalist harmonisers.

Our Culture is worth defending and strengthening.  If that means other cultures must give way to us, in our own lands, then so be it.  Our Lands – Our Culture!
Those who are aware of the dangers inherent in internationalism; those who resist attempts to reduce humanity to atomised units of bland, indistinguishable culturally-void producer-consumers, must see that the only way we can escape the creeping death of multi-culti internationalism is to embrace fully, the sacred union of tradition, blood and soil.

The following video (scroll further down) is a record of a tradition which indigenous people maintained back into antiquity.  At the Opening Ceremony of the 2012 London Olympics, the horrific anti-indigenous spite of the Establishment overflowed into an orgy of multi-culti obscenity.

[Seehttp://www.antiwhitemedia.com/2012/08/uk2012-nation
-in-thrall-to-holy.html
]

The opportunity to showcase our OWN culture was sacrificed in order to push forward the death-cult of internationalism.  If the UK was still in the hands of its indigenous folk and controlled by us and for us, we would have seen a festival of culture, celebrating our traditions and that which appeals to our collective unconscious; not that which belongs to aliens (immigrants).

We have a rich traditional history, and it is only by the full force of the (MSM) media denigrating that which is ours, alongside the full force of the law criminalising the defence and promotion of our own ways, that we have become subservient to those who wish to destroy us.  There are those who laugh at our traditions, and mock them as ‘old-fashioned‘, but that is only because our enemies have manipulated the media to create an obsession with ‘fitting in‘ which places materialism over anything of real value.
All cultures are under threat.  To the internationalists, the sacred traditions of Europe, Africa or anywhere else, must be rooted out in order to create a single market of consumers and a single global production gulag.  If we do not wish to see all we hold dear destroyed, we must take steps to promote our culture, and to become active in keeping it alive.  If our culture dies, then we die too.  The old ways may seem bizarre seen through modern eyes, but is it not the worship of materialism, and the denigration of natural and spiritual worth, which is bizarre?

The following is a video from 1953 which records an aspect of our culture which was under threat even then.

http://youtu.be/6a2xKPMiIJo

We need to revive such phenomena, and to create a solid cultural wall of resistance to the one world nation-destroyers.  It is an outrage that vast sums (of money) are spent on events such as the Bradford Mela which celebrates Asian Culture, but our own indigenous ways are pushed out of existence through Health and Safety legislation and media ridicule.

 It is not long ago that the Welsh language was under threat by Establishment imperialists, yet now it is stronger than for many many years.  The assaults on our culture can be similarly reversed.  It is up to us to ensure that our enemies do not win. > Source

ALSO:

Whose Country Is This?

How To Colonize Britain

**************************

How To Destroy A Nation

How Britain Destroyed Itself

None Dare Say “White Genocide”

**********************************

Is Racial Diversity Good For CANADA?

Post Navigation

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 111 other followers

%d bloggers like this: