ELLIOT LAKE News

Political INcorrect Constructs Arranged To Awaken Slumbering Minds…

Archive for the category “Immigration”

IRISH People Being Dismantled


Read:   http://elliotlakenews.wordpress.com/2010/03/10/50-million-africans-invited-to-europe/


ONE DECADE to DESTROY one Homogeneous White Nation

Population of NIGERIA170,000,000 people

Population of IRELAND —      4,680,000 people

***************************************************************************************************

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ICELAND, too! … Incongruent Black Africans introducing their primitive cultures to Icelanders!
************************************************************

So, not to leave you entirely depressed … listen to the uplifting musical brilliance of Franz Schubert.   H/T to:   http://aryanstreet.com/2014/06/13/make-your-life-count/

http://elliotlakenews.wordpress.com/2013/04/05/rise-fall-of-germany/

LEARN from ancient history what befalls the White Race when allowing incompatible NON-whites into our nations.

Also Read:

IRELAND’S Plummeting Literacy Rate

AFRICAN Violence Comes To Ireland

IRELAND’S Bogus Asylum Seekers

************************************

The Perils of RACIAL DIVERSITY

IRELAND Ripe For “The Taking”

Multi-Racial IRELAND??

**************************

Irish Eyes Are NOT Smiling

First BLACK Mayor in IRELAND?

Aging IMMIGRANTS Tax Canada

By Martin Collacott, Vancouver Sun

The federal government has taken major steps to reduce a massive backlog of applications from IMMIGRANTS wanting to sponsor their (FOREIGN) parents and grandparents to come to Canada.

[See:   Oldsters Make Me Sick ]

At the same time, it introduced new rules requiring sponsors to take greater financial responsibility for parents or grandparents who immigrate to Canada. While these changes represent a significant improvement over what had been in place, they still come at a massive cost to the public purse.

 [Read this:  http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/05/17/immigrants-cost-23b-a-year-fraser-institute-report/]

By 2011, a backlog of more than 160,000 sponsored parents and grandparents was waiting to enter Canada.

At existing admission rates, most would have waited years before being allowed to come here.
The program is so popular, in fact, — it was estimated the queue could reach half-a-million (500,000 FOREIGN elders!) by 2020 with a wait time of 15 years before entering Canada. Sponsors were, not surprisingly, frustrated with the delays.
(ALL EURO-White nations are under siege from NON-white immigrants)

In stating this, however, it should also be noted that the government and the public in general are increasingly concerned about the cost of the program to taxpayers. Since the incomes and taxes paid by sponsored senior immigrants are very small, it has been estimated that, during the lifetime of these senior newcomers in Canada, taxpayers must support the health care and social transfer costs (OAS and GIS, etc.) of at least … $300,000 (each).

[ELN Editor’s Note: Sponsored Elderly Foreigners are very unlikely to contribute anything to our economy. But, just who are these elderly foreigners that benefit from our foolish altruism, and from what nations do these people hail from? Just one example is found in this video.

English: CBC television journalist Ian Hanoman...

CBC television journalist Ian Hanomansing

Also, note the the CBC preference in highlighting visible-minorities and women in their employment roster.  Despite Canada’s high unemployment rate, it’s just another job that WHITE Canadian guys “refuse to do”, thanks to Canada’s racist employment-equity (affirmative action) laws.

Second Logo (1958-1974)

Second Logo (1958-1974)

 White males were exclusively responsible in establishing the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) and amount to about 40% of Canada’s population, yet White males are woefully unrepresented on the small screen of television news and programs. In fact, White males are relentlessly insulted, denigrated and diminished in status as seen in television commercials.

And White European males of any nationality have only invented, designed or produced just about everything of value that is within your reach, including a multitude of scientific and medical breakthroughs that enhance your everyday life.  However, in today’s ANTI-white world, White Canadians are usually relegated to 2nd-place holding patterns while 3rd world-born visible-minorities are often artificially promoted and highlighted well beyond their capabilities.

national Flag of Canada

CANADIANS, please read this:  http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/05/17/immigrants-cost-23b-a-year-fraser-institute-report/

[Read: Canada Open To Immigrant Abuse]

In consequence, just eliminating the backlog will come at a high price. With the admission of 25,000 immigrant parents and grandparents last year, (plus) an equal number this year, and an additional 20,000 (old foreigners) next year, the bill amounts to an estimated $21 Billion ($21,000,000,000) – more than half of which comes in estimated costs for health care. If all those in the backlog are allowed in, the total cost could be twice as high.

http://elliotlakenews.wordpress.com/2013/05/04/oldsters-making-me-sick/

…meanwhile White Canadians Becoming 2nd-Class Citizens]

To prevent such a backlog from developing in the future, the government will place an annual cap on new applications – which for 2014 will be set at 5,000 and which is expected to involve 9,000 individuals when accompanying dependents are included. While new requirements will be in place that are designed to do a better job of ensuring that sponsors will live up to their commitments to support their parents and grandparents, most of the health care benefits and social transfers will still be available to them, and within a few years the cost to taxpayers could, again … be in the tens of Billions of dollar$.

In the circumstances — given the continuing generosity of the system — we (CANADIANS) may well have to expect pressure to increase the numbers admitted … so (yet) more sponsored (FOREIGN) parents and grandparents can benefit. By the same token, taxpayers may object to the high cost, and demand that sponsors pay for all the costs of their elderly relatives. In the meantime, the government will shell out a very large slice of taxpayers’ money to assuage sponsors with parents and grandparents in the backlog. Not that opposition parties would be less generous.

English: Olivia Chow, New Democratic member of...

Olivia Chow, New Democratic (NDP) member of Parliament for Trinity—Spadina, TORONTO

Olivia Chow (Hong Kong-born Immigrant) of the NDP  [UPDATE: Chow is now a candidate to become Toronto’s mayor in 2014] has made it very clear that she is strongly in favour of such sponsorships, while Liberal leader Justin Trudeau has declared that if he becomes prime minister, he will reverse the changes the Conservative (political party) have made, and make it easier for such (FOREIGN) seniors to come to Canada.

(Population of China: 1,360,000,000 BILLION
Population of India:   1,238,000,000 BILLION
Population of Canada:       35,000,000 MILLION)

Canadians remain positively disposed toward immigrants in general. A recent Forum Research poll indicates they support the admission of an immigrant’s spouse and dependent children by a margin of almost six to one.

This welcoming attitude, however, does not extend to bringing in (foreign) parents and grandparents, where Canadians are opposed by a margin of two and a half to one – very likely because of the huge cost to taxpayers, and particularly the pressure on the health care system.

Although the government has made a major effort to bring some semblance of order to the system, the debate over how many sponsored senior immigrants should be allowed to come to Canada, and at whose expense, is clearly not over.  >Immigration Reform

>Martin Collacott served as high commissioner to Sri Lanka, and ambassador to Syria, Lebanon and Cambodia. His recent study, Canadian Family Class Immigration: The Parent and Grandparent Program Under Review, was published by the Fraser Institute and is available at http://www.fraserinstitute.org   — He lives in Vancouver.

(For added emphasis, all bolded, underlined, italicized words and photo/video insertions by ELN Editor)

English: German immigrants at Quebec City, Canada.

Remember when? German immigrants at Quebec City, Canada about 100 years ago. No free welfare money, No free medical care, No subsidized housing. Immigrants went immediately to work, or they went hungry.

Also Read:

Foreign Oldsters Collect Windfall

Foreign Seniors Displacing Canadians

Canadian Generosity Vs Stupidity

Oldsters Make Me Sick

***********************

Canada Open To IMMIGRANT Abuse

Grim Job Prospects for Canada’s Youth

Related articles

White Canadians Becoming 2nd-Class Citizens

Christina Blizzard
Toronto Sun Newspaper

Ontario Government Wants to Help “Refugees” — But Not Young (Canadian-born) Girl

TORONTO – Little Madi Vanstone is one beautiful child — with a major health problem.

The 12-year-old has a rare form of Cystic Fibrosis (CF) and requires a life-saving drug, Kalydeco, to keep her breathing. The big problem is the drug costs $348,000 a year — and it’s not covered by OHIP (Ontario Health Insurance Plan).

Madi’s mom, Beth, gave up work when her daughter was diagnosed with CF at eight months of age. “You can’t hold down a job and have a baby in Sick Kids,” Beth told me recently. “We made some lifestyle changes.”

Madi’s dad, Glen, a pipefitter, has insurance benefits that pay for 50% of her drug bill. The drug manufacturer picks up 30% — but that leaves the family paying $5,770 a month to keep their daughter alive. Folks in their small community near Bradford have rallied around Madi.

Local kids walked dogs all summer to raise money. A fund raising gala made $21,000. Celtic tenor John McDermott put on a concert. The local church held a soup kitchen. They did what Canadians have done for generations — pulled together to help a child in need.

[Read: Oldsters Making Me Sick]

That’s what makes Monday’s announcement by the provincial health ministry so galling. This province (Ontario) is trying to shame the feds (Federal Government) into reinstating care for refugee claimants.

Really?

We can’t even afford life-saving drugs for a child who has lived in this province all her life. Whose family has paid taxes for generations. But in a foot-stamping, blame-the-feds act of cynicism, apparently we have enough money to pay for health care for refugee claimants.

View of Toronto skyline from Toronto Harbour. ...

View of Toronto, Ontario

When I came here (from England), I was just glad to be accepted into a country that is full of so much hope and promise. This is the land that was built on the sweat of can-do people who came looking for work — not handouts.

At a time when our health-care system is failing children like Madi … there’s no way we should be expanding coverage for refugee claimants.

Madi is battling a deadly disease. Within 30 days of going on the drug, she was negative for symptoms and her lung capacity had improved 100%. Without the drug, Madi’s lung function was declining. She’d probably need a lung transplant by her mid-teens — and that would only give her another five years. “The thought of having to take her off it … you don’t know how terrifying that is,” Beth said, her voice trailing off. “It’s saving her life — saving her lungs.”

Madi made remarkable progress with the drug. Within 30 days, diagnostic tests for CF were negative as the drug corrects the defect in her body. Her lung function increased from 78% of expected value to 111% of expected value. But the province adamantly won’t pay.

But we do have enough money to pay the very generous Ontario Drug Benefit Plan (O.D.B.P.) for people here as refugee claimants, and those awaiting deportation.

Are we nuts?

In her news release, Health Minister Deb Matthews said she will send the bill to the feds (Canada’s Federal Government in Ottawa). That’s nervy, but out of line. If the feds decide to cut spending, then the province shouldn’t shame them into changing their mind.

Let refugee claimants hold bake sales for their (own) health care… as Madi’s family has done.

In that release, Dr. Phillip Berger, of St. Michael’s Hospital and a member of Canadian Doctors for Refugee Care, said sick children and pregnant women can’t get care, and cancer patients are denied chemotherapy.

If doctors care that much, they can treat refugees for free.

Madi and other patients needing coverage for their care will be at Queen’s Park (in Ontario’s capital city of Toronto) (on) Tuesday making their case.

The argument that “we can’t afford it” no longer holds water — not as long as our government is throwing money at refugee claimants. We can pay for refugee health care when our $13-Billion deficit is erased — and when our $250-Billion accumulated debt has disappeared.

Until then, let them bake cakes.  >Source

(For added emphasis, links and all bolded, underlined, and italicized words by ELN Editor)

[ELN Editor’s Note: As reported in the above story, apparently no money is available to help save a young Canadian-born girl in her “hour of need”.  However, a Canadian-funded organization is able to come to the immediate rescue of a Toronto-born Somaliananchor baby” wounded in Africa at a Kenyan shopping mall, and have her transported several thousands of miles to a bed in a Toronto hospital … AFTER being absent from Canada for 4 years! Try calculating the enormous cost of air-lifting an injured patient out of the dark continent and flying her to Canada for hospital treatment at our expense!

Furthermore, racially-reverse the roles of these two young girls, and be assured the outcome in our new “politically-correct” nation would be entirely different.

In yet another scenario from a few years ago, Canadian taxpayers came to the rescue of some 15,000 “passport Canadians” trapped in war-torn Lebanon — that cost Canadians almost $100,000,000 – (that’s $100 MILLION) yet the authorities balk at paying a tiny fraction of that amount to save a real Canadian girl … by the name of Madi Vanstone.]

P.S. The once proud, United States of America, seem to have their own brewing problems.

http://hardons-blog.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/white-americans-are-being-targeted-for.html

Also Read:

Canada’s Immigrants – No Help To Us!

Duped By “Multiculturalism”

Canada’s Black Population

Is Burlington TOO White?

**************************

“Useful Idiots”

Canada’s Misplaced Altruism Cost Billion$

Immigration Watch Canada

CANADA’S “REFUGEE” SYSTEM HAS SHOVELLED BILLION$ TO ABUSERS

From “Abusing Canada’s Generosity and Ignoring Genuine Refugees
Published By Frontier Centre for Public Policy

By James Bissett

It is estimated that roughly 800,000 asylum seekers entered Canada (between 1985 and 2010). [Those numbers of unknown foreigners who were foolishly allowed to enter OUR country without hardly a whimper, EXCEED the entire population of Winnipeg, Manitoba >ELN Editor]

Refugees from Sudan's Darfur Region

In the years 2008 to 2010, over 70,000 claims were registered. This is almost 3,000 per month, and considering there is already a backlog of approximately 60,000 claims before the IRB, it is not alarmist to think that the system is out of control.

( Editor’s Note : IRB (Immigration and Refugee Board), is a group of lay people (not having specialized or professional knowledge of a subject, and even former “refugees” themselves) who determine whether a person is eligible to be given refugee status)

In 2009, Canada became the 3rd largest receiver of asylum seekers (33,000) in the Western world after the United States (49,000) and France (42,000). On a per capita basis, however, we rank number one with one claim for every 1,000 people compared with the United States with one claim per 11,000 people.

In BRITAIN … a bogus “refugee” easily scams his way into the country with unsolicited advice/help by an enabling female border control officer. View this video:

[Amateur foreign actors must play their best performance when …  Playing The “Refugee” Game]

Perhaps the most insidious feature of Canada’s asylum system has been its enormous financial cost and the naïve presumption that the sums involved are justified because we are, in fact, “helping refugees“.

Unfortunately, it is difficult to determine the actual costs because they are spread over three levels of government—federal, provincial and local — and involve a wide variety of activities such as housing, welfare, legal fees, medical care and, of course, the operational cost of the IRB itself, which (amounted to) just over $117-million in 2010).

The chameleon-like character of asylum seekers also makes it difficult to determine costs. These people undergo a transformation of status after arriving in Canada.

If the IRB refuses their claim, they become a “failed asylum seeker” and are subject to removal pending any appeals submitted.

However, if their claim is accepted, they are given refugee status. Then, as a refugee, they are eligible to apply for permanent residence (PR) status, and if accepted, their status changes (again) to that of “immigrant”. Different costs are involved at each stage of the transformation of status.

[ELN Editor’s Note:  Thousands of skilled and qualified European peoples – at their own expense — must wait in line for years to have their immigrant documents vetted and approved BEFORE setting foot on Canadian soil to take up residence in our country. Yet, an equal number of un-vetted FOREIGNERS from any 3rd-world hellhole can simply waltz into our country by SELF-PROCLAIMING to be a “refugee”. The government large$$e (read: Canadian Taxpayer) then kicks into immediate action to help feed, clothe and shelter these unknown foreigners on the mere strength of uttering that magic password! How gullible can one be??

To add flavour to this absurd scenario, we’ve adopted another term to describe these liars and cheats who deserve no sympathy from Canadians. We now refer to these bogus “refugees” as Backdoor Uninvited Migrants … or simply B.U.M.(s).

One additional note — from a MSM source — signaling that Canadians are finally waking up to this monumental fraud: Toronto Sun Newspaper]

In 2008, Canada received 37,000 asylum seekers and approximately 60% of these will be refused refugee status by the IRB. Since the government estimates each failed asylum seeker costs $50,000, we can calculate that in 2008 the taxpayers faced a bill of approximately $1.11-billion just to deal with the number of refused cases in the 2008 flow.

Added to the costs are those required to deal with the existing backlog (of 60,000). Even if the costs of the 2008 failed cases are subtracted from the backlog, its numbers have been supplemented by the 33,000 new asylum arrivals in 2009 so the back-log figure of 60,000 would remain at approximately the current level. The costs of dealing with its failure rate of approximately 60 percent would be close to $1.8-billion.

Unfortunately, we are not told if the $50,000 cost figure for (each) failed case is an annual cost, or if it is the total cost involved from refusal of the claimant to eventual removal from Canada. Nor are we informed of the costs of those asylum seekers who are given refugee status by the IRB. The costs do not end when the asylum seeker becomes a “refugee”.

Although it may never be possible to determine the true cost of our asylum system, it is obvious that the current system is terribly expensive and cries out for reform.

(North Korean family try their luck with easy access to our welfare money … read HERE.)

John L. Manion, who was a senior bureaucrat experienced in government financing, a former Deputy Minister of Immigration, Secretary of the Treasury Board, and Associate Clerk of the Privy Council, thought the costs of Canada’s dysfunctional asylum system were in the billions of dollars.

(Editor’s Note:  Manion estimated the cost of the refugee system to be a significant part of the total of $4 Billion ($4,000,000,000) spent per year on immigration and refugee programs.)

[Read: http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/05/17/immigrants-cost-23b-a-year-fraser-institute-report/]

After his retirement, he wrote letters to two immigration ministers, Sergio Marchi and Elinor Caplan, urging them to initiate reform of the system, even if it meant using the notwithstanding clause of the Charter. He did not even get an acknowledgement to his letters.

The Department of Citizenship and Immigration has a lavish grants program that gives money to organizations, agencies and community groups that help immigrants and refugees become settled, and that assist them in finding employment, language training and housing. The money is often channelled through agreements with the provinces or given directly to specific agencies. The allocation for 2010-2011 for Alberta was $60,000,000; British Columbia, $114,000,000; Ontario, $408,000,000; and Quebec, $253,700,000. The remaining provinces and territories received $57.7-million, for a total of $893.4-million. Asylum seekers are the beneficiaries of some of this funding.

[Imagine how those Billion$ of OUR tax dollars could benefit Canadian towns and cities by re-surfacing paved roads, repairing bridges and other needed infrastructure requirements, or building new libraries, or sports facilities for our own people!!  >ELN Editor]

Asylum seekers also receive services from organizations and groups that are given direct financial grants from Citizenship and Immigration. In the period from October 1 to December 31, 2009, almost 200 agencies across Canada received grants of more than $25,000. Sixty of those agencies were awarded contributions in excess of $1-million. For example, the South Asian Family Support Services of Toronto received $13-million, the Settlement and Integration Services of Hamilton received $9-million, and nine Ottawa-area groups received $9.5-million (Disclosure, 2010).

The total allotted for contributions to the settlement program in the Main Estimates for 2010-2011 was $651,749,278.

English: Asylum seekers to Sweden 1984-2007 by...

Asylum seekers to Sweden 1984-2007 by area of origin. Asylsökande till Sverige 1984-2007 efter ursprungsområde

Canadians pay a high price for an asylum system that finds 60% of those assisted to be false refugees. (ELN Editor suggests it’s more likely 98% are bogus refugees.)

It becomes even more scandalous when compared with the cost of other organizations or programs. One can only surmise what an injection of $2 Billion to $3 Billion more would do if directed at improving Canada’s [own] health or educational programs, or reducing the deficit. In a time of alleged austerity and government deficits, it would seem there is no shortage of funding for refugees and immigrants.

Prior to the 1990s, it was expected that the immigrants selected to join the labour force would become established within a year and those sponsored by their relatives in Canada would be looked after by the “sponsoring family” and would not be eligible for government assistance. Even refugees selected from camps abroad were expected to be on their own within a year, and they could expect only minimal financial help during their first year in Canada.

Why is it now assumed that immigrants and “refugees” require massive injections of [our] tax dollars to help them become established in their new country? Could it be that government funding to ethnic and other groups dedicated to helping “refugees” and immigrants is designed more to enlist the political support of these groups than it is to provide help to needy newcomers?

These handouts are not widely publicized by government, and few Canadians are aware of the millions (BILLION$ ??) of dollars devoted to these programs.  >Source

[Daily coverage on the “refugee” game is found at: http://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/

plus a story from the province of Saskatchewan]

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

James Bissett is a former Canadian ambassador with 36 years of service in the government of Canada. He was the Canadian ambassador to Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, and Albania, and the High Commissioner to Trinidad and Tobago. From 1985 to 1990, he was the executive director of the Canadian Immigration Service.

********************************************************************************

Also Read:

Canadian Border Madness

More “Refugees” To Support

CANADA – “Refugees” Paradise

Canadian Generosity Vs Stupidity

**********************************

AUSTRALIA – The Unlucky Country

Canada’s “Poverty-Import” Business

By PaxCanadiana

English: A Canadian Customs and Immigration se...

Canada’s well-indoctrinated journalists always fail to connect increasing poverty rates with Canada’s mass immigration numbers, even though there is much evidence to connect the two. That’s because their brains have been programed not to. That’s why they are working (employed) journalists.

Canadian newspapers are, first and foremost, profit maximizing businesses overseen by a board of directors that pays close attention to stock quotes. And a newspaper’s audience base is it’s prime revenue generator because it is these figures, coupled with circulation numbers, that a daily (newspaper) uses to set prices to charge to potential advertisers.

Mass immigration increases population numbers, and thus, is a source of potential growth for Canada’s journals of record. That’s why they are almost all pro-mass immigration and rarely offer dissenting views that have the potential to influence public opinion and policy makers that will result in lower immigration numbers.

No journalist critical of mass immigration will get his or her work regularly published, let alone get hired in any of Canada’s newspapers because opinions supporting the reduction of immigration numbers is an attack on profits. That’s why in this Toronto Star article no mention is made of how mass immigration may be contributing to the growing income gap.

Income gap growing wider

Canada lags behind 17 developed countries; has no detailed plan to fight poverty, study finds:
Oct 21, 2008 04:30 AM
Laurie Monsebraaten
Social Justice Reporter

Poverty and inequality rates in Canada have been on the rise since 1995 and are now higher than the average developed nation, according to a new study.

The income gap is growing throughout the developed world, but the gap between rich and poor in Canada widened more dramatically than in most countries between 1995 and 2005, according to the report released in Paris today“.

The above is made all the more clearer when mass immigration is taken into account. Over the past twenty years Canadian immigration policy has shifted away from meeting Canada’s real economic needs, and more to a humanitarian program where more unskilled immigrants enter the country, than do skilled immigrants.

Canadian immigration policy is effectively divorced from economic necessity where downturns in the economy no longer compel governments to lower immigration targets. It was in the late 1980s (1988, I believe) when the Progressive Conservative government upped the immigration levels by 100,000 a year.

It was also in the 1980s (1985, I believe) when the Singh decision was made granting Charter protection to anyone on Canadian soil prompting a flood of economic migrants to Canada’s shores to pose as bogus refugees, and abuse our asylum system.

Being flooded with waves of superfluous people imported to fill vacancies in low wage, part-time and temporary jobs, effectively attacking any gains made by the labour movement for fair pay and pay equity, then it should be no surprise to learn that poverty and inequality rates have been on the increase since 1995.

Romania, Germany, Canada, Hungary

And now, Canadian rates are higher than the average industrial nation. This too is no surprise. Canada has the highest immigration in-take in the world doling out citizenship the way (candy) treats are given away on Halloween.

[How much money does this “candy” cost Canadian Taxpayers, you ask? Your answer can be found here: http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/05/17/immigrants-cost-23b-a-year-fraser-institute-report/]

If we include temporary foreign workers and illegal immigrants (which includes failed refugees and those who have no intention of leaving after their visa expires) … then it is likely Canada is taking in between 350,000 to 400,000 people a year.

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/saskatchewan-restaurant-under-investigation-dismissing-canadian-servers-201152512.html

Report Illegal Immigrants]

After 20 years (now 25 years) of continuous decline, both inequality and poverty rates (in Canada) have increased rapidly in the past 10 years, now reaching levels above the OECD average,” says the report.

As in other countries, more single-parent households, and people living alone are contributing to income inequality in Canada.

And wages for the rich are increasing, while they have been stagnating or dropping for middle and lower income workers, the report says.

Most affected have been young adults and families with children.

Canada spends less on cash transfers — such as unemployment and family benefits — than other OECD countries and that may be one of the reasons the country fares worse than others, the report suggests.

The report echoes concerns raised by Canadian social research groups about growing income disparity in Canada at a time of strong economic growth.

English: A portrait of Noam Chomsky that I too...

Noam Chomsky in Vancouver, Canada.

What do I mean by “importing the third world model“? It is something I have borrowed from American lefty-dissident Noam Chomsky, and applied it to Canada. What it means is that advanced industrialized countries such as the United States and Canada are adopting the characteristics familiar with third-world countries and their economies.

One key characteristic of the third-world model is the high amount of foreign ownership of a third-world economy. Here Canada can consider itself an honorary member as our country’s economy is the most foreign-owned of all the G8 nations.

The other key characteristic is great wealth disparity, and it seems Canada is on track to satisfy this one as well. It is more than accepted now that the rich are getting richer, and the poor are getting poorer in this country. The attack on the middle-class is happening on several fronts and one of the key weapons is mass immigration.

It makes no sense to be importing people into Canada’s economy when all that awaits them are insecure jobs and poverty wages. It makes no sense to import people who flood labour markets and hinder, or reverse wage and salary gains. It makes no sense to keep immigration levels high when poverty rates and inequality rates have been consistently increasing for the past ten years. It makes no sense to keep immigration levels high when the economic outlook is gloomy.

English: Demonstration against the expulsion o...

Demonstration against the expulsion of immigrants from Israel, 2009

Such a study by the OECD should stop one to think about the situation and look to see what are its causes so the problem can be rectified. One of the major causes for Canada’s poor performance is because of mass immigration. A chart accompanied the print edition of this piece and all the major immigration receiving nations (the U.K., the U.S., Australia, New Zealand, and Canada) fared relatively poorly. We are importing poverty.

If poverty-activists are serious they should pressure the government to reduce immigration targets because large immigration levels hurt the most economically vulnerable of Canadians. Wages can be kept low, illegals can be exploited, and immigrants lured here on lies and materialistic fantasies of excess, often find themselves in desperate situations when the harsh reality of Canada’s labour market forces them to take any job just to survive.

If Canada maintains its high intake of immigrants despite the warning signs suggesting that the numbers are too many … then poverty rates will barely change and most likely keep increasing. Reducing immigration numbers is one of the issues we must address if we wish to get serious about poverty. >Source

(Underlined, bolded and italicized words are by ELN Editor for added emphasis.)

Roy Beck reveals the disastrous results of allowing for (mostly unabated 3rd world) immigration into the United States in 1999, and still … NOTHING has changed!

Highest IMMIGRANT poverty rates in the State of MINNESOTA:

2 in 3 Somalis, 1 in 3 Hmongs, 1 in 3 Mexicans http://pic.twitter.com/6WADnvHarG

Audio Report on “Moron” IQ Level of incongruent African Somalis in Minnesota, USA.

From the original transcript:
http://renegadetribune.com/minneapolis-minnesota-magnificent-marxist-multicultural-mecca/

By the way, we don’t bring refugees from China, India or Korea (some asylees but not direct resettlement).

H/T  http://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/

Also Read:

WAKE UP, Canada

Labour Shortage MYTH

Immigrants Need Not Apply

Immigrant Workers NOT Needed

Immigrants – ZERO Affect On Economy

************************************

Canadian Border Madness

Lying, Cheating “Refugees”

Canada’s Broken “Refugee” System

From: Immigration Watch Canada

Canada’s Refugee System Remains in Disarray

By James Bissett
From “Abusing Canada’s Generosity and Ignoring Genuine Refugees”
Published by Frontier Centre for Public Policy

Canada

Canada’s Parliament Building in OTTAWA

Unlike other countries, Canada allows almost unlimited access (to its refugee system).

Canada is one of the few countries that permits anyone from any country to claim asylum, and apply for “refugee” status.

(Editor’s Note 1 : Between 1985 and 2010, over 800,000 people made claims to obtain refugee status in Canada. Around 60% of the 800,000 have proved to be fraudulent. The objective of most of the 800,000 people has been to:

(1) gain refugee status, (2) get immigrant status and (3) bring others here. This is why, for many years, critics have stated that Canada’s refugee system has become an alternate immigration system.)

(Editor’s Note 2 : In addition, every year, Canada’s Immigration Department and private organizations such as churches go to refugee camps abroad, and re-settle about 10,000 people in Canada.)

[For our American readers, see daily updates at: Refugee Settlement Watch

… also read: The Refugee Racket]

European Union countries, long ago, introduced pre-screening processes to sort out frivolous and clearly false claims from genuine ones, and they have accelerated procedures for dealing with claimants originating from countries considered safe for refugees. Many countries have reduced welfare benefits and other services to asylum seekers ; others do not permit asylum seekers to work. These methods have been implemented so that fraudulent claimants who are illegal immigrants do not overwhelm their asylum systems.

fields a question from a community member at t...

Jason Kenney

(Editor’s Note 3 : Recently, former Immigration Minister Jason Kenney helped to correct the problem of people coming from Safe countries and abusing our system. He established a list of Safe countries from which claims will not be accepted.)

Under Canada’s system, there is no effective pre-screening procedure to separate the obviously unfounded claims from those that are genuine. As a result, all who submit a claim receive a quasi-judicial hearing before the IRB to determine if they are to receive refugee status. In most cases, the claimant also receives free legal assistance when appearing before the IRB (Immigration and Refugee Board).

Refugees from Sudan's Darfur Region

Sudanese “Refugee” on the road from rags to welfare riches to any gullible White country who believes his sob story. Canada, you say? Here I come!

The problem is that although the IRB finds that almost 60 per cent of the claims are false, there are so many claimants, (that) it can take two years or more for a claim to be heard. In the meantime, the claimant is entitled to (free) welfare, free medical care and other services, as well as having permission to work in Canada.

[See: More “Refugees” To Support]

Moreover, if the IRB decides the claimant is not a genuine refugee, there is a series of appeals and reviews available to determine if there are humanitarian or compassionate reasons why the person should be allowed to remain. In addition, no one can be removed if there is an indication that if the person is sent home, he or she might face torture or death. The longer the claimant remains in the country, the better the chances are that there will be no removal. Time is on the side of the claimant. Prolongation of the time in Canada means that the authorities are either unable or unwilling to follow through with the unpleasant, expensive and time-consuming deportation process.

As a result, thousands of failed claimants are able to stay, and this adds to the attractiveness that Canada has for others (bogus refugees) who wish to use the asylum route to gain entry. The name of the game is to gain entry to the country; for the vast majority of claimants, whether their refugee claim is eventually successful or not is irrelevant. They will get to stay.

On average, it takes 4.5 years from the submission of a claim until a person who is found not to be a refugee is removed; in some cases, it takes 10 years or more. More often than not, the individual either disappears, or is eventually allowed to remain in Canada. The Auditor-General’s report of 2007 pointed out that there were 42,000 warrants for the arrests of failed asylum seekers whose whereabouts were unknown and another 15,000 with addresses presumably listed with the authorities (Auditor-General, 2008).

[See: Report ILLEGAL Immigrants]

The forced removal of failed asylum seekers is a difficult and expensive exercise, frequently fraught with emotional distress and bad publicity when the media or church groups that offer sanctuary champion individual cases. Large numbers of asylum seekers arrive with false documents or without any, so it is difficult to know where to send them when the time comes for their removal. Often it is impossible to obtain travel documents from the individual’s own country.

Removal costs range between $1,500 and $15,000 per removal, but some cases can cost up to $300,000. The new Bill introduced by the Immigration Minister, Jason Kenney, estimates a cost of $540.7-million over five years for the removal of failed asylum seekers. This could be reduced considerably if — upon arrival, –there were a fast-screening system that would prevent obviously false claims from proceeding. Unless removal can be carried out within 48 hours, the chances of successful removal become problematic (Citizenship and Immigration, 2010).

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

James Bissett is a former Canadian ambassador with 36 years of service in the government of Canada. He was the Canadian ambassador to Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, and Albania, and the High Commissioner to Trinidad and Tobago. From 1985 to 1990, he was the executive director of the Canadian Immigration Service.   >SOURCE

Also Read:

Canadian Border Madness

Canada’s Immigrants NO Help To Us

Britain On Suicide Watch

By tesla1966  

Flag of the United Kingdom, Union Flag (also r...

I’m certain that many people in the (U.K.) United Kingdom feel extremely angry and resentful at the betrayal shown by successive governments, past and present, towards its own people.

It seems they have set out to deliberately destroy our once-great nation by post-war mass immigration, and this on-going genocidal act of colonisation has removed social cohesion and unity … replacing it instead with poverty and division.

The Empire Windrush which brought immigrants f...

The Empire Windrush which brought BLACK immigrants from the Caribbean to Tilbury in 1948.

Nobody, I’m convinced, could foretell that on the historical date of June 22nd 1948 when the Empire Windrush arrived at Tilbury docks, that the future of our country would be changed forever, beyond all recognition in the years to follow, and that large areas of our country would then descend into the multicultural ghettos that many of our major towns and cities now resemble today; further more, that we would become second-class citizens in our own lands, except for one man, Enoch Powell.

English: Enoch Powell appearing on television ...

Enoch Powell appearing on television, 3 July 1987

Enoch Powell, the then conservative member of parliament (1950–74) had the vision and the foresight to see what the future would hold, and had the courage to speak out and warn us in advance with his famous ‘rivers of blood’ speech on 20th April 1968; in response he was dismissed from his position as Shadow Defence Secretary in the cabinet of Edward Heath. This is a quote from that talk he gave at the Midland Hotel (later known as The Burlington Hotel) on New Street in Birmingham that day, which is as applicable now, as it was back then. [Update to 2013: Birmingham, Britain’s second largest city, also has the greatest number of schools, 22 in all, with ZERO (0) White pupils.]

MigrationWatch UK

“We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependents, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre”.  (Spoken in 1968 … whereas today’s immigrant influx is about a half-million every year. More updated facts are found at:  Migration Watch UK right side-bar)

Mad indeed … and who can argue with those words made back in 1968 by one of the greatest politicians this country has ever had. Our once great country, particularly in urban areas, has descended into crime ridden third-world squalor, poverty and corruption, not to mention the gangland violence, rape and of course ‘ethnic division‘ bestowed upon us … by the ruling elite.


Primitive African tribalism marching on British Streets

Our forefathers  – who fought and died in numerous world wars for their country — would be turning in their graves at the sight of Britain circa 2013. Those same brave men and women who put their lives on the line for Queen and country, would no doubt, be horrified at the travesty and injustice served upon them by the traitors in parliament today, if they were alive to see it.

Enoch

What we now find is that the native British, particularly the White working-classes, are having to compete for housing and jobs, and who quite understandably feel ostracised from mainstream society. Social housing is allocated it appears, first and foremost to the newly arrived immigrants that have turned up on our shores, while the indigenous people are left to stagnate on long housing lists with no hope of securing affordable accommodation in the mean time.

The irony here is that those who are already housed can’t wait to move out from their ‘culturally enriched’ areas. Incidentally, people often described the satellite towns around our capital as ‘London overspill’ and I now feel that the term has some relevance to an early version of White flight, I’m sure a quick chat to any displaced Londoner would confirm this but the Daily mail on the other hand, would have us believe it is more to do with affluence and success, when in reality the complete opposite is true.

Many people sadly feel the need leave their homes and move out of the “culturally enriched” areas, especially London where they are now (a White) minority, as they could no longer relate or identify with the area they were brought up in, so they have upped sticks and left. I doubt very much it was by choice.

Enoch Powell quoted a letter that he had received from an elderly woman in Wolverhampton street, Northumberland, which summed it up well.

The woman was the only White resident, and had lost her husband and her two sons in World War II. She had rented out the rooms in her house but once immigrants had moved into the street she was living in, her White lodgers left. The letter went on to say that two black men had knocked on her door at 7:00 am to use her telephone but she refused, as she would have done to any other stranger knocking at her door at such an hour, and was subsequently verbally abused. She had asked her local authority for a rates reduction, but was told by a council officer to ‘let out’ the rooms of her house. When the woman said the only likely tenants would be black, the council officer replied: Racial prejudice won’t get you anywhere in this country. I often wonder what happened to that poor lady and how she felt about the hostile treatment she received back in 1968; the same anti-white, pro-multicultural attitudes people have to endure today, if they dare to speak out.

Our politicians these days are not content with helping our own people gain employment, or offering them training for particular skills needed, or to attain meaningful careers. Instead they continue to allow the flood gates to be opened to thousands of foreigners to increase an already competitive jobs market.

The NHS (National Health Service) and all public sector employers are prime examples of organisations who will favour immigrants over the natives, regardless of merit, if only to fill immigrant job quotas – the other beneficiary’s being private corporations and business’, who now have an endless supply of cheap labour to work for the minimum wage. Those lucky enough to secure employment now have to suffer pay freezes, zero hour contracts, and the depression of wages.

A newspaper article, not so long ago, gave us a small insight into how people are struggling to survive. A young couple with no children who were both in full-time work were having to rely on the charity ‘food bank‘ to make ends meet, and I’m sure there are many similar cases to this example.

Many people, because of the minimum wage, are better off receiving benefits, and I’m sure many take this route because it is economically a more viable option, and who can blame them.

The cries of the ‘Brits are lazy‘ is common place, usually made by the more affluent members of society, the ones born with a silver spoon in their mouths, and these same people are lucky enough to have received a good education, and enjoy the benefits of higher paid jobs … but hasn’t that always been the case?

Our education system is not fit for purpose – over sized classrooms and teachers who now have to accommodate numerous different languages in the classroom is hardly the best environment to gain an education. But isn’t that their modus operandi in maintaining the status quo of a ready supply of dumbed down proletariat who — for the most part, have to work hard all their lives just to make ends meet, with no chance of ever increasing their social standing? Many people I know are struggling just to keep a roof over their heads, let alone feed and clothe themselves – not forgetting the ever increasing utility bills.

The deafening ignorance of the liberal left and all political parties towards the plight of their fellow countrymen and women is sickening to say the least, but to be expected. These anti-white, pompous, egocentric perverts with their lust for subversion of society through the promotion of homosexuality and the other distorted views they have on sexuality, means you can only conclude that the lunatics have really taken over the asylum in this country. These same perverts who despise the majority in this country, the White working class, with their multiracial, multicultural agenda and constant bleating on that immigration is a benefit to us all, are the same people who enjoy all the benefits of cheaper nannys and cheaper plumbers, whilst earning their six figure salaries in their cushy jobs.

Try explaining that immigration is a “good thing” to the numerous victims of Asian (Indian or Pakistani) paedophile gangs, immigrant crimes, and murders against the indigenous British. Explain to them … why they must now compete not only for jobs that pay a pittance, but also for affordable housing, too.

 The freedom loving 1960s in White Britain

These are the same people whose forefathers fought and died for this country so that future generations could enjoy a better standard of living. The stench of hypocrisy from the filth that preach from their ivory towers situated in affluent White suburbs is overbearingly nauseating, and still, unbelievably, the sheeple trot out every polling day and continue to vote for these parasitic, bottom feeding scum, why? –  ‘because I’ve always voted labour‘ — you hear them cry, or because ‘my parents voted for them‘.

It’s like someone repeating the same experiment over and over again and expecting a different result, for goodness sake, only a mad man would do this!  Source: >The British Resistance 

This is DUBLIN, IRELAND??

Discover how other WHITE Nations are “enjoying the benefits” of Multi-Racialism.

Canada

Ireland

Australia

*******

France

Italy

Sweden

Norway

*******

New Zealand

…and, let’s not forget
about GERMANY

It’s your worst nightmare, coming true:  50 Million AFRICANS Invited To EUROPE

Thanks for nothing, Barbara …

Grim Job Prospects for Canada’s Youth

By PaxCanadiana

Français : icône pour articles sur le cananda

If Canada’s Youth Want A Future, They Need To Be ‘Red Pilled’* On IMMIGRATION.

From the “when a better life for you means a worse life for usfiles.

The Huffington Post reports:

 “Hovering around 16.9 per cent in 2012, Ontario’s youth jobless rate ‘rivaled that of Michigan’s, and was higher than Indiana, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin,’ said the CCPA.

Supposedly, economically-weaker Quebec had a far lower youth jobless rate in 2012 — 13.7 per cent, the report found. {…}

The difference in unemployment rates between youth and adults in the province is the largest it’s ever been, the report found. {…} Perhaps surprisingly, Toronto comes off particularly badly in the report. The percentage of youth with a job in Canada’s largest city is 43.5% … the lowest of any region in the province. Toronto also has the largest gap between youth and adult employment rates, at 21.8 per cent, the report found.

View of Toronto skyline from Toronto Harbour. ...

Toronto, Canada.

“Toronto’s low employment rate comes from the withdrawal of 15–24 year olds from the labour force,” the report concludes.

The CCPA offers two possible reasons for why Ontario now has the worst youth job climate of any province outside the Maritimes: The “national economic shift away from manufacturing towards resource extraction,” and post-recession government austerity measures.”

A third reason needs to be added:  Mass Immigration.

It’s astounding the report didn’t take this into account, but the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is a left-of-center think-tank and are willfully ignorant to the adverse effects of Canada’s mass immigration policy. In any case here’s the CCPA report.

So here we are. Three decades (30 years!) of unrestrained mass immigration that was allegedly needed to … “keep the economy going, businesses running and Canadians employed” … has (only) helped contribute to an alarmingly high youth unemployment rate in the nation’s most populace province, as well as it’s largest city.

[What item costs Canadian taxpayers $23,000,000,000 (Billion) every year?  ANSWER]

Guess we didn’t see that coming did we? 

How could have we, when we (Canadians) are constantly blinded by the assumed benefits of shoveling hordes of the world’s masses into the labour supply. And the fact, that Ontario and it’s capital city, Toronto – the largest city in Canada, and fourth largest in North America – receives the lion’s share of immigrants … probably has nothing to do with it.

But just think of all the great ethnic restaurants they open. Too bad you don’t have a job, or one with a future that pays a living wage, otherwise you might be able to afford to eat at one once in a while.

This report brings into sharp relief the need to abandon all faith in the purported prophetic powers of labour-market analysts and economists when setting immigration targets; the self proclaimed “experts.”

When they were foretelling the decline in labour-market supply due to Canada’s low birth rate and retiring baby-boomer cohort, the remedy prescribed was increased immigration-quotas to stave off the crash and keep the economy going. If we didn’t do it the sky was going to fall.

Now, it’s 2013 and those jobs either disappeared or moved overseas to the (same 3rd world) countries we are importing immigrants from, and the baby-boomers (born from 1946 to 1964) aren’t retiring as quickly as expected. So … have immigration targets declined to reflect this unforeseen reality? Not in the least. They have, in fact, increased.

Immigrants are not a source of job growth. They grow labour supply. Investment from the public and private sectors are sources of job growth, and when activity from both do not keep up to satisfy the growth in immigrant driven labour supply, don’t act shocked when you get high youth unemployment. And, the decline in investment by Canadian businesses in their workforce by some 40% since 1993 … doesn’t help much either.

The levels of irony here are rich. A major reason immigrants move to Canada is not necessarily for a better life for themselves – many having to toil just over the poverty line in jobs below their skills-set – but for their kids, and to provide for them a future their homeland couldn’t deliver.

It’s not far-fetched to assume that many of those youth affected by the high youth unemployment numbers are the “first generation” Canadian born children of immigrants. The system their immigrant parents sought to benefit from … is now working to the disadvantage of their children.

(Something for our American readers to ponder on … read HERE.)

While the importation of their immigrant parents may have displaced Canadians from the workforce, now immigrants are displacing the Canadian-born children of immigrants. In karmic fashion it’s the system feeding on itself and illustrating why immigrants have a vested interest in seeing immigration quotas reduced.

Another level of irony is that the age bracket of the unemployment figures – ages 15 to 24 – tend to be the most supportive of Canada’s immigration system.

No surprises here as these are the years one is most indoctrinated to the imposed “feel good“, multicult propaganda taught in the public education system. They are rarely exposed to contrarian views, but hopefully to finding a job, choosing a place to live, and living in the real world will wake them up.

Of course, immigration isn’t solely to blame. There are other factors at work that collectively contribute to unemployment figures. But immigration isn’t helping things. It’s making things difficult, if not worse, for Canada’s rising generation, and we need to see to it that they have an inheritance in the land of their birth.

We don’t work and save so that our neighbour’s children have a future at the expense of our own. That’s dysfunctional. On their part, Canada’s youth need to take the red pill* on immigration matters. It’s not “racist” to demand decreases in immigration quotas. A better life for immigrants should not be built on a worse life for us.   >http://CanadianImmigrationReform.blogspot.ca/

(Bolded, underlined words and video links are added for emphasis by ELN Editor.)

*Editor’s Note: The term “red pill” and its opposite the “blue pill” are pop culture terms that became common symbols for the choice of remaining in the blissful ignorance of illusion (blue), or acknowledging the sometimes, painful truth of reality (red).

Also Read:

Importing Black Crime

Importing Jamaican “Culture”

***************************

Canada’s BLACK Population

***************************

“Temporary” Foreign Workers vs Canadians

Canada’s IMMIGRANTS – No Help To Us!

**********************************

Labour Shortage MYTH

Immigrants Need Not Apply

Immigrant Workers NOT Needed

Immigrants – ZERO Affect On Economy

*********************************

Canada / US to share information on bogus “refugee” claims…

Related articles

Multi-Racial Immigration

Back in July 2005, Professor Andrew Fraser received national attention in Australia with a letter to his local newspaper — signed with his academic title — in which he claimed that importing Sudanese refugees threatened to turn Australia into “a colony of the Third World” and stated: “Experience everywhere in the world shows us that an expanding BLACK population is a sure-fire recipe for increases in crime, violence and other social problems“.[2][3][4]

(Read: Australia Meets With BLACK Crime

…and the “beat” goes on.

Importing Black Violence)

English: Macquarie University sign

Macquarie University responded by distancing itself from Professor Fraser’s remarks, but supported his right to say what he wished in a responsible way. The acting Vice-Chancellor, Professor John Loxton, stated there was no place for “racism” at the university, but it “recognises and protects academic freedom as essential to the conduct of teaching, research and scholarship“.

Fraser was accused of being affiliated with White “Supremacist” groups, including the Patriotic Youth League (PYL), by the anti-racist group FightDemBack. Although both he and the PYL initially denied any connection, Fraser admitted he had attended PYL meetings and signed up to the PYL website after video footage of a PYL member describing him as an official legal adviser surfaced.[5]

(Read: African Refugees “Enriching” Australia)

Following an outcry from Sydney’s Sudanese community, Macquarie University Vice-Chancellor Dianne Yerbury on July 29, 2005 decided to suspend Fraser from teaching any further at the campus on the grounds that the race debate was “threatening to spill over into the classroom” and was “affecting the university’s ability to operate effectively.” [6] Macquarie University offered to pay out the final year of his contract, but Fraser declined, describing the offer as a “dishonorable discharge“.[7]

On this incident, Fraser wrote:

“Truth is no longer a defence when it comes to charges of academic deviance. Instead of an invitation to debate the issues, the Vice-Chancellor’s office sought to get me off campus as soon as possible by offering to buy out my contract. The head of Human Resources made it clear to me that my public comments were damaging their efforts to market Macquarie University to foreign students. When I refused the offer on the grounds that it amounted to a dishonourable discharge, VC Di Yerbury, ordered that I be suspended from teaching. This was justified on the specious grounds that the safety of students supposedly ‘had been threatened by’, among others, my supporters! For what must be the first time in academic history, alleged threats by outsiders to disrupt classes were met, not by tightening security to deal with the disrupters, but by getting rid of the disruptee”.[8]

In August 2005, more than 300 Macquarie University staff and students attended a forum on “racism” and free speech, at which Fraser (as well as the Sudanese community, and university members) was allowed to put his views from the floor.[9]

Fraser’s suspension ended in mid-2006, when an early-retirement package took effect.

In September 2005, Professor Fraser wrote an article advocating a return of the White Australia Policy, entitled “Rethinking the White Australia Policy“. The article was set to be published in the law journal of Deakin University, but the University directed the journal not to publish it.[10] “Rethinking the White Australia Policy” has since been published and circulated across the internet.[11]

In the controversial article, Fraser wrote:

“Given the relentless and revolutionary assault on their historic national identity, White Australians now face a life-or-death struggle to preserve their homeland. Whether effective resistance to their displacement and dispossession can be mounted … is another question. Unlike other racial, ethnic or religious groups well-equipped to practice the politics of identity, White Australians lack a strong, cohesive sense of ethnic solidarity. As a consequence, ordinary Australians favouring a moratorium on NON-white immigration cannot count on effective leadership or support, from their co-ethnics among political, intellectual and corporate elites. On the contrary, our still predominantly Anglo-Australian rulers are indifferent; some profit from, and others actually take pride in their active collaboration with the 3rd-World colonization of Australia. None of the major parties, indeed, not one member of the Commonwealth Parliament, offers citizens the option of voting to defend and nurture Australia’s Anglo-European identity. The problem, in short, is clear: The Australian nation is bereft of a responsible ruling class”.[12]

In December 2005, Fraser further criticised multiracialism in Australia by writing an article regarding the 2005 Cronulla riots, entitled “Diversity vs. Freedom: Australians Fight On The Beaches.”[13] As with the full version of “Rethinking the White Australia Policy“, the article was only published on the internet, namely on the US-based webzine VDARE.

A complaint from the Sydney’s Sudanese community about the original newspaper letter was upheld on 31 March 2006 by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, on whose direction Fraser reluctantly apologised for his remarks.[14][15]

Andrew Fraser addressed the American Renaissance Conference in February 2006, alongside speakers such as Nick Griffin of the British National Party and Professor J. Philippe Rushton. This was followed up later in the year with appearances at the Inverell political forum in March, and at the Sydney Forum in August alongside speakers who included Jim Saleam of the Australia First Party.

In an article for Alternative Right entitled “The Cult of “The Other“”, Professor Fraser warned that academic freedom was being stifled in Australian universities. He wrote:

“Academic freedom in Australia is dying before our eyes; another sacrifice performed in the now holy name of “The Other.” In the universities, as elsewhere, public criticism of privileged minorities must walk a shaky legal tightrope, unfortunately, in a mass-mediated wasteland of intellectual cowardice and political conformity, Australian universities are not an oasis of dissent. If my experience as a teacher, scholar, and, more recently, a first-year theology student is a reliable guide, academia is utterly hostile to free thought and frank discussion on race, ethnicity, and gender“.[16]  >Source

Also Read:

Mob Violence In America

Black Violence Comes To IRELAND

****************************

None Dare Say WHITE GENOCIDE

50 Million Africans INVITED To Europe

**********************************

Diversity Is A Fraud

Racial Diversity – A CON Game

Multiculturalism – A Dividing Force

*****************************

Democracy and Our Flaws

QUEBEC Leading The Way

From: Immigration Watch Canada

Quebec Should Really Be Saying, “We Are Full.”

English: Québec Province within Canada. Españo...

Québec Province in Canada.

Let’s be frank : Quebec’s Charter of Values is a reaction to unnecessary immigration.

The problem is that the Charter is a round-about way of getting at this issue. Quebec should have been much more direct. It should have taken the political initiative for all of Canada and said, “We are full.” , meaning “We have gone far beyond Quebec’s and Canada’s cultural saturation point. We have far too many minority groups, and we are tired of their demands.”

[Read: Herouxville, Quebec Enters Immigration Debate]

There are other good reasons to say that Quebec is “full”, but that is a starter.

If polls on the public’s views are to be given weight, the majority of Quebec’s population supports the Charter. Close to half of the rest of Canada does too. Meanwhile, the leaders of all three of our major political parties have denounced the Charter. They claim that Canada should follow their supposedly “morally superior” way. They imply that anyone who dares to think that Quebec and any other part of Canada has the right to stand up and defend itself against the immigration flood suffers from a disease.

The problem for our so-called “leaders” is that the Quebec population’s dis-ease is quite a sensible reaction of a society in the process of being overwhelmed. In contrast, the comments of our “leaders” are sycophantic, cowardly and treacherous.

So, for the benefit of those “leaders” and a significant number of Canadians who feel too intimidated or brain-washed to express a view critical of Canada’s immigration intake, let’s review two fundamental rules in immigration policy that every country has to follow in order to survive :

(1) NEVER ALLOW YOUR MAINSTREAM POPULATION TO BECOME A MINORITY   If you don’t follow this rule, you are accepting re-colonization. It is outrageous and telling that none of our three major parties has ever expressed any concern about this cultural fundamental. The multicultural policies they subscribe to imply that there need be no limit to the number of newcomers that Canada takes. Let them tell nonsense like that to Canada’s First Nations (Native Indians)!!

(Read: How To Colonize Britain)

They also imply that the political entity called ‘Canada” can continue to exist in spite of how culturally different the people from other areas of the world might be. Most of the newcomers will agree that Canadian society is superior to the societies that many of them came from. If it were not, why did they leave those societies and come here?

Yet, many of these newcomers now want to make Canada look like their countries of origin. For example, many of those countries are environmental disasters because they are grossly overpopulated. For that reason alone, it would be logical for people from such places to want to avoid re-creating a population crisis here. However, the goal of a significant number of these arrivals (foreigners) is to increase their numbers by all methods necessary.

[Read: New CHINESE Political Party in British Columbia]

The majority of Quebec’s population is tired of accommodating these people’s demands to make Quebec resemble their failed societies. The majority can sense that continuing down that road is wrong.

(2) NEVER ALLOW IMMIGRATION INTAKE TO BECOME LARGER THAN YOUR COUNTRY’S ECONOMIC NEEDS   Immigration can have a small humanitarian factor, but it exists for the benefit of the host country. Our major political parties have violated this rule over and over. The most brazen example of this occurred in the last recession when none of them complained about increasing immigration at a time when hundreds of thousands (of Canadians) had just lost their jobs.

According to a number of experts, Canada’s national unemployment rate is now probably almost double the 7% that is commonly announced. For certain parts of our population, it is probably well over 20%. There are some Canadians who are not making an effort to train themselves, or to make the necessary move to other parts of the country to find employment. But the unemployment numbers are so high that this excuse cannot be applied to all of our unemployed, and cannot be used as a reason to continue importing huge numbers of (foreign) people.

Canada is now in a situation where employer greed, in both the resource extraction and service sectors, may be at an all-time high. The resource sector wants to extract non-renewable resources and to sell them as quickly as possible. The prices it gets for them do not take into account the cost of cleaning up the mess that the extraction leaves behind. That is to be left to ordinary taxpayers and to future generations. If the resources do not involve creating a mess, the employers pay no attention to the fact that the resources are finite and in need of being conserved. Furthermore, in service industries, low-wage employers like Tim Horton’s exploit whatever sentiment and loop-holes they can to import low-wage labour.

Both employers and the immigration lobby claim that “Diversity” in the work-place and in the country is essential. Where is the evidence to support that claim?

Since the mid-1980′s, both have used the grossly-faulty work of Rosalie Abella on preferential hiring to batter down the doors of common sense, and to fill our work-places with (foreign racial) minorities that Canada never needed.

Contrary to what Canada’s major political parties advocate, no country has an obligation to commit suicide, whether it be cultural, economic or environmental. The current world model for national suicide is Syria with its diverse groups. but there are countless other models. If Syria, or any of these other countries could turn back the clock and avoid diversity, they would jump at the chance. The pursuit of such nonsense as “Diversity” will deliver the same negative results here.

Those opposed to Quebec’s Charter tell us that the Charter is the government’s cheap way of deflecting attention from Quebec’s current negative economic condition. These critics fail to acknowledge that unnecessary immigration has created a large surplus of labour which has undoubtedly contributed to Quebec’s current negative economic state. If Canada continues to accept this unnecessary labour inflow, it is accepting an inevitable and unending descent into low wages and a lower standard of living.

So, Quebec, let’s be more direct. Let’s hear you say, “We are full. We have accepted far too many minorities and we have gone far beyond our saturation point.”

And, the rest of Canada … let’s see you show the same courage.  >Source

[You can email a link to this post by ticking the email box below. For added emphasis, all Bolded, underlined words, and links by ELN Editor]

Also Read:

The Betrayal of Canada

“Diversity” Is A Fraud

We Need To Talk

Post Navigation

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 114 other followers

%d bloggers like this: