ELLIOT LAKE News

Political INcorrect Constructs Arranged To Awaken Slumbering Minds…

Archive for the category “N.W.O.”

Did YOU Know?

A Black family born in a white-ruled nation is forced to live in poverty-stricken conditions because:

1) … the unemployed father is DENIED his sovereign right to lawfully seek employment in the nation’s job market because of his swarthy complexion. “Employment-equity/affirmative action” exists to serve only the White majority population … not the Black minority.

2)… the Black family is DENIED access to social welfare benefits and forced to live “rough” on city streets, or in makeshift, unsanitary squatter camps without running water, nor with proper toilet facilities, or they’re forced to live in rural barns alongside pigs and other farm animals.

Additionally, and further out into the country’s expanse of rural farmland, hard-working Black farmers and their families are systematically being slaughtered to death without remorse by marauding, blood-thirsty White murderers plundering their isolated homes. The Black Women and children are often raped and tortured in the most gruesome, gut-wrenching manner.

Now, you’d be correct to ask … something is not quite right here?!

That’s because NONE of this described scenario is true!

But — reverse the racial components — and you’ll discover the events described … are actually occurring to White people in today’s Black-run South Africa.

In fact, many North American and European household pets (cats and dogs) are treated better, and enjoy a higher standard of living than what impoverished White people receive in South Africa.

You will not find these noteworthy stories reported in western newspapers, or by listening to your television news reader … so read on and validate this deliberately suppressed news for yourself.

**************************************


***************************************

(Note: The term “Afrikaners” (Boer) refers to WHITE PEOPLE born, raised, or living in South Africa … whose first language is Afrikaans and whose original ancestors were Dutch Europeans … the very White people responsible for inventing, building and successfully establishing the country itself.)

White South Africans Fighting Back!

Read:

South African Killing Fields

“Kill the Boer, Kill the Farmer”

South African Child SEX-SLAVES

****************************

White South Africans DENIED Jobs

****************************

White GENOCIDE In South Africa

South Africa – GENOCIDAL Slaughter-House

*******************************

South African BLACK Empowerment

… other South African news items
are found in the “Category” link
in the right side-bar, or click HERE.

For more updated South African
news items on this subject
matter, check out:

http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.ca/

The Value of “Money”

From DailyKenn.com

How Money Works

Marxism Utilizes Multiculturalism To Manipulate Our Economy

The original money was labor that produced something of value.

One neighbor would help the other hoe his garden, and the other would help him patch his chicken coop. Productive labor was the original exchange medium.

The red color of beets comes from betalain pig...

Red Beets

The stuff produced by labor was as valuable as the work itself. One would spend a day in the field raising beets. Then, when he needed eggs, he would trade ten beets for ten hen’s eggs from his neighbor.

Stuff — such as beets and eggs — was the exchange medium that represented productive labor, which is defined as the production of marketable goods or services.

Gold Key, weighing one kilogram is used to acc...

Precious metals (gold and silver) eventually became the preferred item to exchange. It could be weighed precisely, couldn’t have an unexpected rotten center, and couldn’t break on the way home. Furthermore, it could be saved indefinitely.

Kings began controlling the circulation of precious metals. They would forge pre-weighed units as ‘coins‘ and have their image stamped on each one to validate authenticity. One coin would be worth five beets or a dozen eggs, or a day in the field. Everyone knew the value of each coin.

Productive labor was the standard that gave coins value. A coin represented the stuff that represented productive labor.

Banks and governments that owned and controlled gold and silver began offering notes that represented their coins that represented stuff that represented productive labor. Notes issued by the British government were called pounds, an etymological throwback to the weight of sterling silver. American notes were called dollars.

Banks then allowed checks that represented notes that represented coins that represented stuff that represented productive labor.

Banks have now gone a step further. They allow electronic bytes that represent… What?

Economists consider the money supply to consist of fiat money, that is, it’s backed by nothing.

Checks are nearly obsolete. Notes (dollars) are used less frequently. Gold and silver coins have long since been displaced by cheap metals, and the gold standard that underpinned the value of currency is no longer applied.

• The Productive Labor Standard still stands

When you access your bank account via the Internet to view the digital numbers on your computer screen, those electronic bytes represent the dollar notes that once represented precious metal coins that represented stuff that represents productive labor.

Your productive labor is literally converted to digital units displayed on your computer screen as recorded on the bank’s computer.

If we suppose those digital numbers represent gold and silver stacked up in the bank’s vaults (or stacks of paper that once had the same value as gold and silver), we are mistaken. They represent our productive labor.

When someone uses a government-issued EBT card, they are purchasing goods and services with someone else’s productive labor. That productive labor was taken from the worker and redistributed to a non-worker.

• The Value of Productive Labor

The value of the electronic bytes that we send over the Internet is determined by mutual consent. The value of currency is actually nothing more than the total consensus of those who use it as a means of trade, sans tampering by the Federal Reserve.

That mutual consent, no longer based upon a standard of precious metal, is still — ultimately — driven by productive labor and the value of the stuff it produces.

The standard that endues money its value is the productive labor it represents. It doesn’t matter if the medium of exchange is beets, eggs, bits of gold, slips of paper with presidents’ heads printed thereon, or computer bytes. Productive labor is, ultimately, the underlying medium of exchange. When productive labor fails, economies fail.

Flag of the Soviet Union

Flag of the former Soviet Union (USSR)

The failure of Marxist theory in the old Soviet Union is that it squashed the profit motive that drives productive labor. When Russians stopped producing stuff, their economy floundered. It also explains why geographical regions such as Detroit and Haiti languish in economic depravity and disparity: The people who live in those areas are not efficient in productive labor.

Productive labor is now, and has always been, the medium of exchange. That medium of exchange can be rendered ineffective by government tampering, as it was in the Soviet Union, or by the innate inability of a population to produce goods through labor, as seen in Detroit and Haiti. Conservatives are correct to pin the blame on Marxism for the economic failure in the USSR. They are incorrect to pin the blame on Marxist dogma in Detroit and Haiti.

• Manipulating money with multiculturalism

Peoples of sub-Saharan Africa do not suffer in poverty for lack of natural resources. Rather, their economic failure is due to their inability to engage in productive labor.

The reason Mexico, Central America, and South America fall behind North America economically is because the people who populate those regions are not as competent in their ability to affect productive labor.

Note, for example, that the Falkland Islands have the highest standard of living in South America in spite of the fact that the islands have the highest cost of living. How is that possible? It is because the people who inhabit the islands are genetically predisposed to be more efficient and effective in intelligent productive labor. Think of the Falklands as an island of intelligence, or a bit of North America existing in South America.

The evidence is empirical and, therefore, logically undeniable: Some people groups engage in less efficient productive labor and, therefore, have less stuff. The disparity in living standards may not be caused by a lack of physical labor, but a deficiency in intellect that constrains both innovation and the ability to engage in the most efficient use of labor. In short, simple labor trumps laziness, productive labor trumps simple labor, and intelligent productive labor trumps mere productive labor.

Such thoughts are anathema to Marxism. Its moral sensitivities demand that we all should possess the same amount of stuff.

Marxism loathes economic disparities because it confuses disparities with depravities. The Marxist mantra is that the obliteration of disparity will erase depravity. Granted, such thinking is idiotic, but that’s what they believe. Still, Marxism can’t deny the obvious fact that certain people groups are innately more efficient at productive labor and are, therefore, wealthier.

A portrait of Karl Marx.

A portrait of Karl Marx

Though severely crippled in Russia, Marxism still prevails in the marketplace of ideas, particularly in the West. Void of reason or logic, it seeks to appeal directly to the innate altruism of the most productive people group — White people — by convincing us that using such phrases as “the most productive people group” — though painfully obvious — is somehow immoral. The quest of Marxism, then, is to displace our cognizance of reality through emotional mind manipulation. If Marxism can’t convert us intellectually, it will convert us emotionally. And it is succeeding.

The ideology of Marxist moralism thrives as cultural Marxism and serves as the gateway to economic Marxism.

• Thinking requires thinking

The ultimate Marxist objective is to erase economic disparity. There stands a seemingly insurmountable obstructive barrier that prevents Marxism from achieving its ideal of economic parity: Lots of smart White people.

Without the benefit of a deadly virus that would affect only peoples of European descent, Marxism favors an assault on the collective mindset of White folks.

Given its propensity for mind manipulation and comprehension of collectivist thought, Marxism has set about to dislodge the rational-thinking barrier from the masses of White Americans and replace it with reality-denying neurosis. And again … it is succeeding.

Marxism cannot effectively appeal to the intelligence of individual White people because its premise, as earlier noted, is blatantly idiotic. Rather, Marxism bypasses White intelligence and appeals to our emotional center which, when activated, nearly always overrides our intellect. The outcome is predictable: In spite of our intelligence, we respond like thoughtless, irrational dotes. We have, in fact, surrendered to the emotional appeal of Marxism.

• Protecting the productive class

The emotional bulldozers that raze the intellectual structures embedded in the brains of White Americans include guilt (White privilege), shame (often termed ‘white supremacy’), and dubiety (what Judge Learned Hand described as ‘that ever-gnawing inner doubt as to whether you’re right.’)

We have allowed the media to apply mental agitation to change our minds. We no longer think rationally … we think emotionally.

The reality that White people have delivered boatloads (literally) of innovation that has enhanced the lives of billions of Non-whites is never acknowledged. Why? Because that acknowledgement is a function of the intellect. Intelligence works against the Marxist mantra. The fact that the displacement of White innovation with the Marxist mantra will be devastating to Non-whites is never considered. Again, such thinking requires thinking. And thinking destroys Marxist myths.

[Read: It's A Wonderful Race]

• Relation between ego and economics

The most efficient bulldozer that displaces rational thinking among White Americans is often overlooked. It is Saul Alinsky’s Rule Number Four which states, “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

Our egos seldom operate concurrently with our intellects. Ridicule attacks our egos and prods us to take defensive postures that defy reason. White Americans would eagerly chuck Western culture under the bus rather than endure the humiliation of being falsely ridiculed as “racists”.

We fear and despise ridicule because its negative social ramifications are often severe. No one wants to associate with a person who is inflicted with social cholera. The effect of ridicule is stigmatization that isolates one from others and limits their influence. Hence the term, “cooties.”

The end analysis is that White Americans emotionally adapt to Marxism by adopting such nonsense as Affirmative Action and the multiple forms of government-forced integration that undermine the innovative productive labor that is the standard of our free-market economy.

• Applied intelligence trumps emotional manipulation

Our defenses include a simple awareness that emotionalism is a sorry replacement for intelligence, and that rational thinking is, in the end, superior to the recoil inherent to assaults on our egos through the ploy of ridicule.

It is incumbent upon us, and our prodigy, to defend both our freedom of association and our free market economy where the innovative and productive labor standard is the most efficient means to deliver prosperity, well-being, and enhanced lives to all.

To do otherwise is abject racism.  >http://dailykenn.blogspot.ca

(For added emphasis, all underlined, bolded words and links by ELN Editor)

Also Read:

“I Am a WHITE Man!”

“White Pride” DENIED Trademark

******************************

Understanding Money

Economic Plan of Germany’s NSDAP

Why We Deny Reality

From DailyKenn.com

I recall the first time I viewed VDare.com.

It was years ago when the site was still in its old cumbersome and difficult to read format. My mind was awash with guilt and foreboding as I realized, to my shock and horror, that I had landed on one of those “racist”, “white supremacist” websites. I shirked away in sullen guilt, overwhelmed with shame that I had allowed myself to cast a glimpse at such disgusting content … even though I hadn’t actually read it.

Later, I learned my assessment of VDare.com was wrong. That false impression was subtly implanted in my mind by external sources, critics whose agendas were contrary to those of American patriots.

Fortunately, my curiosity drove me to investigate. I discovered that the web site’s publisher, Peter Brimelow, was a highly respected and well-known investment guru. He was hardly one of those hooded hillbilly caricatures concocted by the left. Furthermore, Brimelow is not even from the South.  He is of British birth.

My second look at VDare.com included a few moments of actually reading the content. Still a bit of flush tinged my face from residual brainwashing encounters that flood the media, I tepidly proceeded only to learn that VDare.com had been grossly misrepresented. It’s content had little to do with race, but focused instead, on immigration. Racial aspects were, of course, included.

What I previously presumed to be brain poison turned out to be the cure for latent traces of Marxism that tainted my otherwise libertarian-conservative brain. A lust for reality and quest for truth compelled me to continue to visit the site almost daily.

In time I discovered other web sites, such as Amren.com and the coarser, but honest (Stuff Black People Don’t Like)  SBPDL.com, and the more docile but ever-so-sexy AngryWhiteDude.com. No longer restrained by chains of guilt, I was free to explore in search of simple truth.

A question arises:

Where does the guilt sensation come from when we encounter bits of reality that conflict with the prevailing cultural Marxist agenda? Who laid the mental track that our minds are to run on? Why are we awash with guilt when we allow ourselves to consider reality regarding racial and other matters? Why did our great-great-grandparents thinks so differently? Are we truly enlightened? Or has our thinking been dulled and darkened?

Our environment, particularly entertainment television and cable news, are an ongoing sensitivity class that instructs us what to think and what thoughts are taboo. When public figures defy those taboos (think Michael Richards and Don Imus), they are presented to us as demonic examples; evidence that abject evil still exists in this world in the form of racism (always White racism!) Their sins are greatly exaggerated while more serious racism — such as the epidemic of black-on-white violent crime — is ignored. In time our minds are molded so efficiently that we think their thoughts are our thoughts and, eventually, they actually become our thoughts.

We become so sensitized that we shirk in horror at the slightest suggestion of “racism”, even where it does not exist. Liberals use this to their advantage. The so-called “race card” is effectively used as a noose that drags us about at will.

We live in perennial fear of being labeled a “racist”.

Our fear is then channeled by projecting it back on the source by denial. Our denial is often expressed as sarcasm and ridicule (and occasionally anger).

Nonetheless, reality remains.   >Source

Also Read:

Mass Mind-Control Through Media (MSM)

Hierarchy of Multi-culturalism 

************************

“Useful Idiots”

WAKE UP! Canada

White People Are Hypocrites

*************************

“Racism” is NOT Sinful

The Right To Discriminate

Muhammad Ali Spoke The Truth

The Late, Great U.S.A.

White Americans as percent of population, Cens...

White Americans as a PERCENT of population, Census 2000.

By Irish Savant

Ok, I admit it.

I’m becoming a bore on the subject, but not a day goes by in which the spiralling degeneration of the USA towards Turd World status doesn’t blow my mind.

The economic side of it is just one example, of course, as is the programmed re-engineering of the country’s racial makeup.

But the Mugabe-like financial profligacy, the blatant and unapologetic ignoring of legal and Constitutional constraints, waging undeclared wars, grotesque forms of nepotism, plummeting educational standards — and most of all — the acquisition by the state, of powers which arguably rival those of Stalin’s USSR.

Then there’s the media which is just a mouthpiece for whatever regime is in power, while behind that regime, the Real Government operates with indifference to the people’s needs. Add in what appears to be the general lack of criminal accountability and you have … Mexico. or Brazil.

[Now, more FORCED racial integration costing BILLION$ ... HERE.]

I could go on and on. What really staggers me is the speed with which it’s happening. We’re talking about a country being fundamentally transformed in the space of a couple of generations. I personally have never seen anything remotely like it … even historically. What was — allowing for all its faults — the world’s greatest country, is breaking down before our eyes.

It’s scary.  >>read MORE

See Astonishing U.S. Immigration Numbers

Also Read:

Message to American White People

White Americans – An Endangered Species

**************************************

What If “THEY” Left?

Immigrants & Welfare

Middle-class Worker Bees

The Coming Retirement Crisis

***************************

100+ Million NON-whites in U.S.A.

ILLEGAL Immigrants Don’t Come Cheap

‘California Dreaming’ Towards De-construction

The Betrayal of Canada

Ricardo Duchesne,
Professor of Sociology, UNB
Author of “The Uniqueness of Western Civilization

English: Flag of Canada over country contour F...

From Immigration Watch Canada

Last year, Maclean’s (Magazine July 9) had a front cover story “How Canadian Are You?” — bumptiously announcing that Canadians have earned the right to brag as a people with a great culture.

It offered an endearing “Canada Day Special” quiz for readers to determine how Canadian they were.

How much do you weigh? How many servings of veggies do you eat a day? How many times a week do you have sex? Should the NHL ban fighting? How many partial curl-ups do you do in one minute? If you scored between 20 and 25, you earned “bragging rights,” you are “a quintessential Canadian.” But if you scored between 5 and 9, you are lacking in “Canadian pride,” you are not in the right country.

This is what contemporary Canadian identity has become after five decades of mass immigration combined with endless pageants to multiculturalism. The idea that Canada has no other identity (other) than ethnic diversity has been encrypted into our brains starting with Pierre Trudeau’s announcement in Parliament in 1971:

English: Pierre Trudeau speaking at a fundrais...

Pierre Trudeau in Montréal, Québec.

“We believe that cultural pluralism is the very essence of Canadian identity. Every ethnic group has the right to preserve and develop its own culture and values within the Canadian context. To say we have two official languages is not to say we have two official cultures, and no particular culture is more ‘official’ than another.”

[Editor’s Note: The often-quoted Cicero stated over 2,000 years ago:

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
Cicero

According to Trudeau, every ethnic identity in the world is, and can become equally “Canadian“.

The British and the French are no more important to the making of Canada’s identity than the Chinese, Muslim, Mali, or Latino “Canadian”. “Racism and bigotry” were a “large part” of Canada’s “official” history and tradition as a European nation. This once-official view will no longer be tolerated.

The “White Canada” policy laid down in the Immigration Act of 1910, and extended in the Immigration Act of 1952 … ended in the Immigration Regulations of 1967, when a non-racial set of admission criteria was adopted.

According to those Regulations, the Act of 1952 was unpardonable. Today, few care to consider that the justification behind the “White Canada” immigration policy was the preservation and cementation of the primary role of Canada’s founding peoples of European origin. The idea that other peoples (who had taken no part in the settlement efforts and in the centuries-long creation of the institutions and infrastructure of Canada) might simply arrive in mass numbers to claim Canada as equally their own was anathema to Canadians before the establishment of multiculturalism.

The new 1967 immigration regulations emphasizing skill and education rather than ethnic origins were not brought on by popular demand, or even parliamentary debate and initiative, but by senior Ministers and Cabinet officials who did not trust the average Canadian to respond in a positive way on this issue (Hawkins, p. 63).

Gallup polls in the 1960s showed that only about one-third of Canadians thought that Canada should bring new immigrants, and over 60% thought that the fairly low levels of Asian immigration (at the time) were already too high.

This clip was taken when the City of Toronto was overwhelming White with few racial minorities (mostly Chinese):

In complete disregard to Canadian popular wishes, the borders of Canada were set wide open in the 1980s to immigrants from Asia, Africa, the Caribbean, Central and South America and the Middle East, under the directives of the major (political) parties, the media, tenured academic radicals, and business elites.

The number of immigrants coming each year into Canada since the early 1990s has been staggering, roughly 225, 000 and 260,000 immigrants per year … mostly from NON-European nations (85%+- NON-whites).

From 1981 to 2001, (Canada’s) visible-minorities increased more than threefold (almost 400%) from 1.1 million people, or nearly 5% of the population, to 4.0 million people, or 13% of the population.

By 2011 the foreign-born population of Canada stood at 20.6 per cent. Settling mostly in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver, immigrants have radically transformed the cultural composition and socio-ethnic dynamics of Canada’s major cities.

English: Toronto: Skyline, left side the Canad...

TORONTO – Canada’s Largest City

By 2017, it is expected that 50% of Toronto’s population will be immigrants, up from 44% in 2001.

In Vancouver, the proportion is projected to be 44%.

Other cities such as Calgary, Edmonton, Winnipeg, Saskatoon, Regina and Ottawa are also seeing their traditional European milieu changed by an ever rising tide of visible majorities.


Oh, Canada – Wake Up!

Today, the mainstream media (MSM), and the academic world take great pleasure in labelling our immigration policy prior to 1967 — as “racist and exclusionary”. But this is a cultural Marxist assessment of Canadian perceptions, their culture and ethnicity.

Canadians then, were part of a Western world committed and strongly attached to the idea that every individual citizen of Canada should be treated equally under the law without discrimination based on race, national origin, or religion. They were not “racist”, but merely ethnocentric — that is — a people with a natural and normal preference for their own ethnic traditions.

Ethnic groups throughout the world exhibit a preference for their own culture, and a disposition to judge other cultures by the standards of their own religion and customs. But today in the Western world, ethnocentrism is looked down upon as an attitude that contravenes the “universal brotherhood of humanity” to be manifested in Western multiethnic and multicultural societies.

As diverse ethnic groups come into contact with one another within Western countries, our liberal elites bow to the importance of “understanding” other cultures and overcoming one’s ethnic prejudices. Europeans still exhibiting strong attachments (to their age-old cultures) are said to be bogged down by “irrational fears”.

But recent scientific research shows otherwise: ethnocentrism is a healthy and practical evaluation of one’s ethnic identity and interests consistent with evolutionary theory and cultural sophistication. This is the argument ethnocentric individuals can opportunely take from a scientific paper published in Psychological and Cognitive Sciences (January 2011), with the fitting title: “Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism”. Written by a research team at the University of Amsterdam, directed by Dr. Carsten de Dreu, this article shows that oxytocin is a human molecule associated with in-group favoritism and out-group derogation.

Through a series of experiments in which participants were administered doses of oxytocin, the researchers learned that “a key mechanism facilitating in-group cooperation is ethnocentrism, the tendency to view one’s group as centrally important and as superior to other groups” at the expense of an out-group.

How, then, did European Canadians come to accept the idea that it is “racist” and “xenophobic” to exhibit preference for one’s own ethnicity and heritage, while believing, at the same time that every NON-European ethnic group has a right to preserve its own culture inside Canada?

How did Canadians come to believe that their identity can be proudly captured in answers to such banal Macleans (Magazine) questions as “How many rooms does your house have per person?” There is no space here to address these questions. Suffice it to respond — to those who claim that multiculturalism was in origins and essence a “quintessentially Canadian” idea and policy — that the relentless promotion of diversity and mass immigration, despite some variations, has been a Western-wide phenomenon since the 1960s.

The American President Lyndon B Johnson signed the Immigration Act of 1965, which led to a tremendous surge in immigration from Mexico and Asia in the decades that followed. Eight years later the “White Australia Policy” came to an end, resulting in a massive influx of ethnocentric Asians.

Western European nations have also seen their cultures awash in immigration and diversity. The British Nationality Act of 1948 affirmed the right of Commonwealth citizens (including those of newly independent Commonwealth countries like India) to settle in the United Kingdom.

Commonwealth immigration rose from 3,000 per year in 1953 to 46,800 in 1956 and 136,400 in 1961 Some restrictions were introduced in the 60s and 70s including the British Nationality Act, which required migrants to have a “substantial connection with the United Kingdom” by birth or ancestry to a UK national.

Nevertheless, in the 1970s, averages of 72,000 immigrants were settling in the UK every year from the Commonwealth; and in the 1980s and early 1990s around 54,000 per year, rising to around 97,000 by 1999. About half the population increase in Britain between the 1991 and 2001 censuses was due to foreign-born immigration.

By 2012, White British had dropped (from 87.5% of the population in 2001) to ONLY 80.5%.

White Britons in London — in 2012 – accounted for less than half (44.9%) of its population, and more than one in three London residents is foreign-born. As the country was flooded with immigrants, diversity was strenuously enforced through incessant media campaigns including the transformation of the entire curriculum from pre-kinder onwards away from any historic pride in the British heritage. Similar changes have been brought by liberal elites in France, Spain, Italy, Sweden, Denmark, and increasingly as well in Norway, Switzerland, and Ireland.

[See: Perils of Racial Diversity]

Some will argue that these changes were “sensible” components of worldwide trends toward “globalization”, free trade and free capital mobility. The fact is that if economic globalization was naturally accompanied by the “free” mobility of people, then we should have also seen major demographic-ethnic changes in Asia, and the world generally.

Asia’s now advanced economies have seen international trade, investment and finance represent ever growing portions in their economies, but in total contrast to the countries of North America and Europe, Asia has not seen migrants grow as a share of its population. In fact, immigrants have accounted for a mere 1.4-1.6% of Asia’s population over the past 20 years. Moreover, contrary to the argument that immigration has been a necessity brought on by low fertility rates and ageing of the populations of the West, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and other Asian countries have fertility rates below replacement, even lower than Canada’s and some of Europe’s countries: at 1.4, 1.2, 1.2, and 1.1 respectively. And the proportions of their populations above the age of 65 are very high and rising.

The question thus stands: Why are European-created nations the only ones experiencing mass immigration and multiculturalism? Some may point to the youth-centered counterculture emerging in the 1960s questioning the values of anyone over thirty — that is to say — the values of the silent majority of Canadians who felt comfortable with the Immigration Act of 1952.

Writers, actors, and producers across the West, whether in fiction, theatre, or film, broke old taboos against sexual explicitness, graphic violence, homosexuality, and divorce. The civil rights movement in the United States, exotic guerilla movements in the Third World, Aboriginal Rights, Quebec nationalism, opposition to the war in Vietnam, and the complete takeover of Canada’s universities by cultural Marxists, were components of the 1960s political atmosphere.

However, if I had to choose one reason why Western countries decided to negate their European heritage and ethnicity, I would say it was the twin ideologies of universalism and egalitarianism. By universal egalitarianism, I mean the idea that humans are essentially the same everywhere, and that our ethnicities and cultural ancestries are either superficial, or easy to transform through proper instruction in the acquisition of modern “universal values” such as civic equality, tolerance, affluent civility, and democratic participation.

The notion that the liberal elites in the West represented the highest ideals of humanity had become conventional thinking in the 60s. The West was ahead of other cultures in the institutionalization of these universal values; it was the moral obligation of Western elites to showcase these values to the world. Humanity could be united under these values with different ethnic groups co-existing and interbreeding in the same lands in an atmosphere of liberal affluence.

These ideas preceded the 1960s with roots going back to the Enlightenment and perhaps even Christianity. The senior government officials who introduced non-racial immigration rules in Canada in the 1960s were influenced by the ideas which led to the creation of the United Nations and a multiracial Commonwealth.

The UN Declaration of Universal Human Rights in 1948, the UNESCO statements on race (1950, 1951, 1964, 1967), with their language about a common humanity, which arose directly from the experience of Nazism, made some politicians uncomfortable with a Canada acting on the world stage as a democratic and liberal nation while excluding non-Whites from its borders. The Immigration Act of 1952 seemed old, exclusionary, and illiberal.

This love for a future non-ethnocentric humanity, projected onto a benign future that was not real, entailed a growing dislike and intolerance for the actual Canadian population of European ethnic origin. In 1971, this European population constituted about 96% of Canada’s demography. This existing European population still sympathized with Mackenzie King’s 1947 announcement in the House:

“The people of Canada do not wish, as a result of mass immigration, to make a fundamental alteration in the character of our population. Large-scale immigration from the Orient would change the fundamental composition of the Canadian population.”

But liberal elites, as the radical 1960s spread, were determined to re-engineer the souls of average Canadians. There was no national debate on multiculturalism and mass immigration. Canadian immigration policy proceeded, for the most part, by way of non-transparent regulations, executive directives, and administrative discretion … not by legislative action.

Immediately after Trudeau’s 1971 announcement, numerous programs were implemented:  multicultural grants, ethnic development programs, funds for the writing of the NON-European ethnic histories, support for Canadian ethnic studies “to set the record straight” by reflecting Canada’s diverse cultural traditions and the contributions of non-British and non-French to Canada’s identity and history. All ethnic groups were to be seen as equal to the making of Canada. Never mind the actual historical and political fact of the two founding peoples of Canadian Confederation!!!

With grants freely available, there was, in the words of one observer, an “explosion of academic research into ethnicity.” Between 1971 and 1982, 88 scholarly works on cultural minorities were published in Canada, as well as numerous collections of papers ; many symposiums on Canadian ethnic groups and relations were held. A new discipline, “Canadian Ethnic Studies,” was born, soon to proliferate throughout the halls of academe. This was just the beginning of a “bonanza of remarkable proportions” in the promotion of multiculturalism through every level of society.

In June 1984, the Conservative Leader Brian Mulroney told a cheering crowd that his party now stood for multiculturalism and would not allow itself to be called “the Party of White Anglo-Saxon Protestants”. Multicultural diversity — he said — was an absolutely obligatory part of Canada’s national identity and to reject it … was to reject Canada.

He then outlined future changes his party intended to implement in the hiring policies of the federal government, services in non-official languages, more funds for the preservation and advancement of NON-European cultures and greater efforts to “stamp out racism wherever it rears its ugly head.”

This stamping out was directed singularly against the British people and their legacy in Canada. The French in Quebec had successfully managed to portray themselves — from the 1960s onwards — as an oppressed minority within Canada with its own legitimate identity seeking a new constitutional deal framed against Anglo Canada. It was the British, and then the Europeans who had assimilated to English Canada, who were being asked to relinquish any sense of culture deeply grounded in ethnic bonds, ancestry, and homeland.

The ethnicity of Quebecers, and of Native peoples, could be viewed in primordialist terms as deeply rooted in their lands, communities, histories, and customary identities. But normal British and English Europeans were prohibited from binding themselves to a geographical and cultural “homeland”.

Their ethnicity was to be de-linked from a homeland called “Canada”. There was no such a thing as a Canadian identity that could be linked primordially to the British or the English-Europeans. The European-Canadian identity was to be witnessed only in multicultural tolerance, pluralist values, democracy, and diversity. But since these values were “universal” — for “humanity” – they would not be seen as uniquely British or European.

To the contrary, these values would be used against any British sense of identity for the sake of protecting and promoting the ethnic pride of NON-Europeans.

Asians, Blacks, and Latinos had the right to preserve their own ethnic roots and culture in a “multicultural” Canada. They would have hyphenated identities such as “I am really Chinese, but I live in mosaic Canada,” or “I have ethnic Chinese roots, but I identify with Canadian diversity and democracy.”

Since the British were allegedly the agents of “racist” and exclusionary immigration practices, and whereas the immigrants (including the millions who were not yet in Canada) were the “victims” of such practices … multiculturalism, thus worked necessarily as a force against British identity, and as a force for non-European identities.

To this day — every day — media pundits and self-righteous academics insist that “racism” is experienced by immigrants of visible status, and that a “major goal of multiculturalism must be to eliminate racism.”

Forget that visible immigrants come from illiberal, racially ranked, and backward cultures, and that individual rights and non-racial discrimination policies were unique legacies of the British, and that visible immigrants in Canada are far more uncomfortable with other visible groups, than are European Canadians.

The point is … that “racism” per se, has been inexorably tied to the ethnocentrism of British/European Canada, and so the elimination of “racism” requires the eradication of British and European identity. Some iconic symbols and practices such as the maple leaf, hockey players, and calendar photographs of Lake Louise may be allowed. The Maclean’s ‘Canadian’ “with bragging rights” should ask for no more.

Perhaps on Canada Day, rather than celebrating the dispossession of European Canadians and their transformation into “quintessentially” deracinated characters, we should critically examine the unfounded notion that European ethnocentrism, and only European ethnocentrism, amounts to “ethnic cleansing”, “fanaticism,” and “violence” against outsiders (Kelley and Trebilock, p. 471).

Japan, Korea, and many other countries, have a very high degree of ethnic homogeneity, as do some Nordic European countries (Finland, Norway, and also Switzerland), but none of them are engaged in wars of exclusion and violence against other ethnic groups.

Ending mass immigration and multiculturalism in the West is not an act of exclusion and racism. It is the other way around : these policies have amounted to acts of exclusion and dispossession against the historic British and European peoples of Canada. Our cooperative nature is intrinsically connected to our in-group nature. Ethnocentrism means loyalty and commitment for one’s group; it does not entail “hatred” and “rancour” against other groups. The scientists Carsten de Dreu et al. observe 2011), in fact, that the tendency for in-group members is to favour their own rather than to hate outsiders:

“[T]here is good reason to believe that the in-group prejudice effect is far more basic to human life than is the out-group hate prejudice effect, and research on human ethnocentrism supported this positive-negative asymmetry of social discrimination. “

The multiculturalists are the ones who have infused politics with an intolerant ideology in which anyone proud of his European heritage, and refusing to join the multiculti choruses … is despised as a “xenophobic” outsider. The irony of creating a “universal humanity” is that it has required the dehumanization of the British people, or any other particular European group, wishing to retain its identity.

Multiculturalists advocate in-group favoritism for immigrants and cultural Marxists, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, out-group hate for those Canadians who love their European heritage.

They have demonized the European founding peoples of Canada as an out-group, an enemy of “humanity”, to be eradicated for the sake of NON-European “diversity”, and the creation of a new species inside Canada and the West.

Their position runs counter to the natural, healthy and rational ethnocentric prejudices of humans. It also runs counter to the actual ethnic diversity of the peoples of the earth. Why would the Japanese, Koreans, and Pakistanis want their countries to look like “diverse” Toronto?

Let us defend European ethnocentrism in the name of human nature and the true diversity of the peoples of the planet.  >Immigration Watch Canada

(For added emphasis,  underlined Bolded words and links are by ELN Editor)

http://www.dailystormer.com/council-of-european-canadians-an-excellent-website-in-defense-of-the-people-and-culture-of-the-west/

Also Read:

“Useful Idiots”

How To Destroy a Nation

Importing BLACK Violence

Importing Jamaican “Culture”

Canada’s BLACK Population

*************************

Police Surrender To “Diversity”

Canadians Betrayed By Politicians

White People Under Relentless Attack

New Zealanders Against Asian Invasion

By Shawn McAvinue

A Christchurch-based right-wing political party has delivered anti-Chinese government flyers in the South (Island) as it prepares to form Otago branches.

The location of Dunedin in New Zealand.

And a Malaysian mother fears the flyer – [titled] CHINA – A Threat to New Zealand? – will “stir negative sentiments” towards Asian immigrants living in Dunedin.

Former National Front director Kyle Chapman said he sent about 1000 anti-Chinese Government flyers to Dunedin for supporters to put in letterboxes. The supporters “reported back” that all the flyers had been delivered in Dunedin, he said.


China: 1,360,000,000 (BILLION) People Vs. (tiny) New Zealand: 4,470,000 People. Guess WHO wins!?

“New Zealand’s population has passed the 4.5 million mark, according to Statistics New Zealand.  [...] During the seven years between censuses — the Chinese population increased 16% to 171,000 —  the number of Indians increased 48% to 155,000 — and Filipinos more than doubled (100%) to 40,000.

New Zealand (especially Auckland) are now classified as “super diverse“, said Massey University humanities and social sciences research director Professor Paul Spoonley.

“That has two aspects. One is the size of the non-majority populations (NON-whites) – the fact that 23% of Auckland is Asian – they’re a very significant non-majority population. The other aspect is the number of immigrant and ethnic communities.”

The newly-formed political party, the Resistance Party, was recruiting members and forming branches across New Zealand, he said. Mr Chapman, who contested the Christchurch mayoralty unsuccessfully in 2005, said he planned to “establish a leadership” in Dunedin soon.

Official logo of Dunedin

Official logo of Dunedin

We have membership and committees being formed in about 22 towns and cities right now, including Dunedin, North Otago, Central Otago and Southland.”

He planned to visit all the South Island branches, including Dunedin, by the end of the year, he said. If an Asian family living in Dunedin was offended by the flyer, then they had emigrated to the wrong country, he said.

If they can’t accept that we are in a free country, in a free society, with free speech, then they really came to the wrong country. If they want to go to a country that is full of fear, where people aren’t allowed to speak out, they really need to go back to whatever country they came from.”

Also read: http://www.dailystormer.com/voice-of-albion-interview-with-new-zealand-white-nationalist-kyle-chapman/

A Dunedin (immigrant) mother of five (5 children), who did not wish to be named for fear of retribution, said she emigrated from Malaysia to Dunedin (N.Z.) in 2002, and the family had never experienced “racial abuse” until she found the flyer in her letterbox earlier this month. “I’ve never encountered ‘racism’ in this lovely, peaceful city. The weather is cold but the people are warm.

[Editor's Note: The word "racism" has lost all meaning of its original definition. In addition, this 'word weapon' is fast losing its potency as a slur against White people who only care about the continuance of their own existence as a separate race.]

The flyer had unfairly targeted Chinese citizens because they — like many other Asian immigrants — had invested their “hard earned life savings” in New Zealand. She and her husband had bought a home in Dunedin and raised five honest hard-working children, she said.

She read the blog mentioned on the flyer (http://rwrnz.blogspot.co.nz/) and was “appalled” and feared the flyer would “stir negative sentiments” towards Asians living in Dunedin.

Race Relations Commissioner Dame Susan Devoy said the Human Rights Commission would work with police to provide assurance to those upset and offended by the flyer and blog.

Who wouldn’t feel threatened by this kind of material? It presents a hateful view of law-abiding people. It is unfair and based on ignorance, intolerance and prejudice,” Dame Susan said.

[ELN Editor's Note: There is nothing "hateful" in defending your own tribal rights in your own country being flooded with incongruent foreigners. The "Dame" should feel more "threatened" by the stirring Chinese interest in establishing their own exclusive political party ... on New Zealand soil!]

English: Chinese gates at Dunedin, New Zealand

Chinese gates at the gates of Dunedin, New Zealand

 Read: Chinese IMMIGRANTS Start Political Party in NZ   Here is an excerpt:

A group of CHINESE IMMIGRANTS, upset that no Chinese candidate has been put forward by the main parties, will today launch a well-financed New Citizen Party campaign.

Party co-founder Stephen Ching, a former Labour candidate, said the party had powerful backers (Communist Chinese Government??  – Editor) including the man who was behind the failed Crafar farm bid, Jack Chen“. >Source

[Editor’s Note:  Dear readers, are you able to see what is happening here?! A distinct racial block of emboldened FOREIGNERS desire to establish their own exclusive political party in the sovereign nation of New Zealand after New Zealanders graciously welcomed them into THEIR home!

Imperialist Tribal Politics are driving these arrogant Chinese COLONIZERS to “take over the reins” of New Zealand. They’re preparing to own and operate New Zealand on their terms … and this, after only 25 years of a mass Asian influx! Yet, after reading this latest link (below) it appears that traditional European Kiwis are still asleep and not awoken up to the reality of colonization through immigration.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/opinion/10187254/Immi-what-Hysteria-over-immigration-falls-flat

Make no mistake in thinking otherwise, because it is your European and Maori childrens’ future that is in jeopardy. The “Trojan horse” is firmly inside your sovereign gates, and getting stronger for every year that you tolerate the influx of mass 3rd-world immigration.]


“New Zealanders”???
[Auckland's population base has plummeted to only 52% White European against a rising  29% Asian, 11% Pacific, 8% Mäori and 2% Other]

New Zealand is not alone when Chinese IMMIGRANTS seek out their own political power base.

Read: New CHINESE Political Party in CANADA, too!

& Emboldened Minorities “EYE” Canada]

Senior Sergeant Kelvin Lloyd, of Dunedin, said anybody distributing material that could “incite a racial issue” should be careful.

English: 2003–2004 Mitsubishi Diamante (TL) VR...

Near Dunedin Central police station, Dunedin, New Zealand.

It is something we would take a very dim view of.”

[Take a moment, Mr. police sergeant, to reflect back in history when Maoris were mass colonized by Europeans, thus ending in their DISPLACEMENT, too!

Aiding and abetting the invading COLONIZERS won't find favour with your future progeny whose White heritage will become massively overwhelmed by China's human exports. > ELN Editor]

Also read:

http://www.dailystormer.com/maximum-enrichment-white-genocide-in-new-zealand-praised-by-media/

On a side note … look for the usual ANTI-white theme being broadcast in this New Zealand T.V. commercial (seen below) that readily “could incite a racial issue” … if White New Zealanders woke up and read between the lines in this blatant propaganda clip.

Clues to look for:

CHINESE family are happily, happily, and exclusively displayed front and centre for the first 33 seconds (remember, this is NEW ZEALAND … not China!).

Single White female sitting across from a smiling, healthy NON-white (foreign?) man making eye-contact. She responds with “an interest” by running her hand through her hair, until another White female takes a seat near her NON-white ‘husband’. (She is wearing a wedding ring) Then a subtle and disappointed “oh well” look … is cast in the first White woman’s eye.

The next-to-last scene shows a helpless and invalid White man bound to a wheel-chair politely allowing the White woman through the doors, but she walks off without hardly a passing glance at the courteous, White stranger of her own race.

The final scene shows the miscegnational (race-mixing) couple walking away from the train, plus the Chinese family (once again) … displayed in the background.

Edward Bernays would be proud of the producers of this ANTI-White propaganda clip. CLICK: http://elliotlakenews.wordpress.com/2011/08/28/anti-white-media/

MORE on this video here:

http://irishsavant.blogspot.ca/2014/04/a-textbook-brainwashing-case-study.html

In 2011, a group called Right Wing Resistance, headed by Mr Chapman, was investigated after pamphlets urging people to “Stop the Asian Invasion” were distributed in Auckland and Christchurch.  >Otago Daily Times

Also Read:

“I Am a WHITE Man!”

How To Destroy A Nation

Declining Western Nations

Dangerous Reality of “Diversity”

*******************************

“If You’re BLACK, Go Back”!

SWEDISH Liberalism on Fire

Last Call For White BRITAIN

AUSTRALIA’s Declining White Population

 

The C.B.C. – The Nation’s Question

A National Broadcaster Must Be Non-Partisan on ALL Issues … Especially IMMIGRATION

From Immigration Watch Canada

A significant part of the Canadian population does not understand what is happening on the immigration issue. The obvious question that should be asked is … WHY?

All our major political parties have contributed to this lack of understanding by refusing to admit publicly, that Canada’s immigration intake (an average of 250,000 immigrants per year for the past 23 years) is both abnormal and unnecessary.

[Those 1 Million needless foreigners entering our country every four years -- of whom 85% are NON-white -- also drain Canadians of over $23,000,000,000 (Billion) per year!!  What’s the percentage (%) of WHITE people on this planet?  ANSWER  >ELN Editor]

In addition, all of our political parties have refused to acknowledge that most of this (immigrant) intake, as well as Canada’s “Temporary” Foreign Worker program, has caused significant negative consequences for Canadians.

[The number of immigrants allowed into France is around 180,000 per year, and in Canada it is closer to 250,000. As France’s population is around 65 million, and Canada’s is not much more than 1/2 that, the writing is clearly on the wall.

If things are left as they are, White Canada will eventually be swamped and destroyed; we must therefore make democracy work for us, by creating a political party that will put our interests first and foremost, before we find ourselves literally fighting for our very survival. >Read More.]

Almost all of our media — either do not understand what is happening on the immigration issue, or are involved in partisan reporting in favour of the immigration status quo. In other words, the media’s behaviour when dealing with the immigration issue is very similar to that of Canada’s political parties.

CBC

The CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) which receives close to $1 Billion yearly from Canadian taxpayers (to inform Canadians about their country and the world) has long taken a partisan, pro-status quo position on the immigration issue.

Although the CBC does some very good work on some issues, its work on the immigration issue testifies that it works diligently to mis-inform and deceive Canadians. This undermines much of the CBC’s good work and makes CBC listeners and viewers inevitably ask : “What is the CBC distorting, omitting or suppressing on other issues?”

[Read: CBC Faces a Reality Check]

The CBC may not have the majority of Canadians – as listeners or viewers — but its large tax-payer resources enable it to exist in publicly-paid for buildings and to use state-of-the-art broadcast facilities.

There, it can disseminate material, conduct research and do many things which the majority of other Canadian media cannot afford to do. The Canadian media who do not have access to these public resources often re-broadcast material from the news items that the CBC broadcasts. In re-broadcasting partisan CBC views … they magnify the damage done by the CBC.

The CBC is currently boasting that it has increased its share of Canadian listeners and viewers. Its partisan stance in favour of the immigration status quo continues and intensifies.

The CBC’s stance goes on, in spite of its own policy, 2.2.17 which is titled “Political activity”.

That policy clearly states that:

The CBC / Radio-Canada must remain and appear to remain impartial in carrying out its professional duties to the Canadian Public. It is essential that the CBC / Radio-Canada neither holds, nor appears to hold, a position on any matter of public concern or controversy.”

There is absolutely no doubt that many CBC reporters, hosts, producers and executives have taken a partisan stand in favour of the immigration status quo. Even a tiny sample of what the CBC does any day of the week on radio or television would show that the CBC acts as the virtual propaganda arm of Canada’s high immigration lobby.

Supposedly, the public can register complaints about CBC partisan activity with the CBC Ombudsman’s office. Accordingly, the public should expect the CBC’s Ombudsman to be a non-partisan arbitrator of complaints about CBC partisan behaviour. However, any member of the public who has complained to the Ombudsman’s office soon discovers that the Ombudsman, for example, dismisses all immigration-related complaints and gives almost robotic approval to virtually everything that the CBC broadcasts.

In recent judgements of four immigration-related complaints, CBC Ombudsman Kirk Lapointe and his successor, Esther Enkin, ruled that the CBC had not violated CBC policies. They ruled this way, in spite of the fact that the four cases in question were examples of CBC’s clear violation of its 2.2.17 “Political activity” policy.

Dozens of complaints could easily be registered every week across Canada of CBC partisan activity on the immigration issue. Anyone who has witnessed what is going on would see that the past and current Ombudsman go through mental contortions to justify all CBC work, no matter how outrageously partisan.

Like the CBC’s partisan policy of turning Canada’s public radio and television over to Canada’s immigration lobby, the CBC’s Ombudsman office is corrupt to the core. That office needs to be replaced by a completely independent complaints office because the CBC Ombudsman’s office is a clear failure. The Canadian Radio and Television Commission should be given this responsibility.

[However, if the CBC offends ISRAEL with just a word or two, that will cause  CBC's Ombudsman Esther Enkin to springboard into immediate action ... story HERE.  And another ruling by ESTHER ... HERE > Would ESTHER be of the Jewish persuasion?  >ELN Editor]

Current CRTC insignia

In addition, because the CBC is extremely partisan, clearly violating its own policy on “Political Activity”, and therefore abusing its role, the CRTC (Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission) should be given the power to dismiss CBC employees who practice partisan behaviour. At present, members of the Canadian public, which subsidizes the CBC, have no one to turn to when the CBC treats them with contempt.

To begin the process, and in the interest of fairness, the CRTC should collect data on the partisan activity of the CBC and Radio Canada over just the past year. It will be easy to find a large amount of extremely damning evidence. The CRTC should make full use of its existing power. It has the authority to grant the CBC a licence to broadcast.

There is an overwhelming body of evidence which supports the notion that the CRTC should add significant restrictions to any CBC licence it has granted or will grant to the CBC. Among those new rules should be a requirement that the CBC be non-partisan on the immigration issue. 

Second Logo (1958-1974)

CBC Logo from a more homogeneous and friendlier time(1958-1974).

If the CRTC looks only at the past month of CBC broadcasting, it will easily be able to justify an immediate censuring of the CBC . To ensure that the CBC remains held to account for its future behaviour, and to ensure that CBC listeners and viewers receive non-partisan coverage of the immigration issue (but other issues as well), the CRTC should introduce, as soon as possible, whatever other measures it considers necessary .  >Source

An example how brainwashed, gullible Canadians treat anyone with an opposing point of view in Halifax, Nova Scotia

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Now, for the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) in the U.K. … please read the following :

By Melanie Hall
The Telegraph, May 29, 2013
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/10085715/BBC-biased-towards-pro-immigration-lobby-says-study.html

ALSO:

“Useful Idiots”

WAKE UP! Canada

Canada’s Black Population

Canadians Duped On Multiculturalism

**********************************

Labour Shortage MYTH

Immigrants Need Not Apply

Immigrant Workers NOT Needed

Immigrants – ZERO Affect On Economy

***********************************

CBC Faces a Reality Check

Last Call for WHITE Britain


http://libertygb.org.uk/v1/

Also Read:

How To Colonize Great Britain

How Britain Destroyed Itself

Something Wrong in Britain

An Awakening Experience

**********************

“I Am a WHITE Man

Telling It, Like It Is

A Sense of Belonging

Britain’s “Reverse” Racial Discrimination

************************************

Flag of the United Kingdom, Union Flag (also r...

A once stable,  homogeneous nation,  … now gone forever!

Circa Late 1950s

MultiCulti – A New Religion?

James Albion

Multiculturalism, a new religion? Why not?

We bow to the “God of Multiculti“, our Police Commissioners tip-toe with nervous apprehension when faced with the daily realities on how to accommodate this new religion, and are extremely nervous as to how to deal with strange peoples from strange lands bringing with them strange customs.

The Police, too … have been unwittingly seduced, and have been known to kneel in strict observance in reverence to this unholy religion. The ordinary Policeman or Women? Well … theirs is not to question why, or they will face a disciplinary board faster than their feet can touch the ground.

Our government also seduces its own people to give up their ethnic uniqueness and identity, and instead, are encouraged to wallow like swine in this festering mish-mash of a violent Multi-Culti society.

The island people are speechless and stand in awe, unaware that their day to day perceived freedoms are non-existent, but they are unknowingly moulded and cunningly crafted to ensure unwanted Multiculturalism is thrust upon them without dissent. We are not alone; many other western countries are now plagued by the effects of its poisonous tentacles.

We must embrace diversity and enrichment” shout the New Architects; more expressions from [George] Orwell’s world of (the novel) “1984”?

But in truth, what do these words actually mean? They are just words, because in truth, these people do NOT WANT to diversify, and 3rd-world violence does NOT “enrich” a civilised nation. The invaders do not even diversify with other imported “exotic” cultures, thus we see the appearance of Ghetto’s, — sorry — visible-ethnic-minority clusters in many of our decaying major cities as experienced in many of Europe’s once peaceful cities.  I repeat … it is a cruel illusion.

If approximately 4,000 of our own people who have been murdered by these ‘Enrichers’ who have been invited into OUR country to “enrich” and share our culture … then it IS an illusion.

The establishment and Police will not warn the people of this silent, murder by stealth of its own people because it smacks of institutionalised racism. The lives of our people are easily expendable and any serious dissent can be kept in check by threats of incarceration; a small price to pay to foster uncertainty upon them to meekly accept this new Muti Culti religion.

Note: Professor Divine mentioned in this short TV interview … is BLACK.

If our government is forced to bring out strict laws to enforce this Multi Culti religion — then it’s only obvious — it is unwanted by its own people.

Just as there are strict laws to protect our people against Murder, Rape and Paedophilia, it is just another evil. What makes it even more obscene is that the government that enforce it — are also our own people.

So what is its aim? Like “Winston Smith in Orwell’s (novel) prophesies of “1984” (written in 1948) — I thought I knew — but it is too complex for me to understand. There are too many variables; it is protean in its concept. I sometimes wonder if the government have unleashed a terrible Genie out of the bottle and they now realise that in the very near future they will not be able to control this evil monster, thus we are seeing our security and intelligence services being beefed up.

They are now employing increasing numbers of these same invaders to help warn and combat the threats — which mark my words — will one day turn our streets into 1st world killing grounds.

So where are the violent threats coming from — our own people?

Most certainly notbut from the very people who are part of this multicultural illusion, the armies of the Genie.

Keeping the stopper on the bottle would have saved at least 4,000 of our people’s lives. But it just proves who cares? The perpetrators are STILL in power.

The future “Winston Smith” might not be surprised to be stopped in the street one day by a officer in a blue uniform, speaking broken English, wearing medals and ribbons for devotion and loyalty to the Federation and on his shoulder a identification patch with the letters EQRG (Eurabia Quick Response Group) surrounded by yellow stars. By then, as Orwell’s “Winston Smith” found out much to his consternation, it will be too late, he thought he knew who his enemies were too, but the hidden enemy were his own people.   > Source

WELCOME TO THE BRAVE NEW WORLD.

Excellent speech by Jared Taylor (1996)

Also Read:

Race Diversity? Why?

Multi-Racial IRELAND?

Destroying European Civilization

Multiculturalism – A DIVIDING Force

*************************************

“A Racial Program for the 20th Century”

50,000,000 Africans INVITED To Europe

******************************************

My Awakening Experience

Last Call For WHITE Britain

Multi-Culti Used to Destroy National Identity

Perils of Racial Diversity


H/t http://www.nationalprotectionism.com/

Declining Western Nations

BRITAIN

So, This is England?

An Awakening Experience

GANG RAPISTS Are Majority NON-whites

IRELAND

Ripe For “The Taking”

Black Violence Comes To IRELAND

Ireland’s Plummeting Literacy Rate

CANADA

Importing BLACK Crime

Canadians DUPED On Multi-Culti

Is Racial Diversity Good For Canada?

UNITED STATES

The Shelbyville, TN Experience

U.S. State of Maine – Somali community organizers: We demand our welfare money! Photo: Bangor Daily News

Gang Raping AFRICAN Refugees (New Hampshire)

Illegal Aliens Kill THOUSANDS Yearly

SOUTH AFRICA

South African Killing Fields

WHITE Genocide in South Africa

South African White Child Sex Slaves

SWEDEN

Sweden Tops In Rapes

Can Sweden Survive Multi-Racialism?

AUSTRALIA

Africans “Enriching” Australia

Australia Meets With Black Crime

NORWAY

Raped in Oslo, Norway

“ALL Rapes” By Foreigners (Norway)

DENMARK

Has Denmark Learned A Lesson?

FINLAND

Finland Heading Towards Disaster

ITALY

Italian Town Ejects Black Foreigners

GERMANY

Right Thinking in Germany

FRANCE

France Is Falling Fast

Post Navigation

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 107 other followers

%d bloggers like this: