We bow to the “God of Multiculti“, our Police Commissioners tip-toe with nervous apprehension when faced with the daily realities on how to accommodate this new religion, and are extremely nervous as to how to deal with strange peoples from strange lands bringing with them strange customs.
The Police, too … have been unwittingly seduced, and have been known to kneel in strict observance in reverence to this unholy religion. The ordinary Policeman or Women? Well … theirs is not to question why, or they will face a disciplinary board faster than their feet can touch the ground.
Our government also seduces its own people to give up their ethnic uniqueness and identity, and instead, are encouraged to wallow like swine in this festering mish-mash of a violent Multi-Culti society.
The island people are speechless and stand in awe, unaware that their day to day perceived freedoms are non-existent, but they are unknowingly moulded and cunningly crafted to ensure unwanted Multiculturalism is thrust upon them without dissent. We are not alone; many other western countries are now plagued by the effects of its poisonous tentacles.
“We must embrace diversity and enrichment” shout the New Architects; more expressions from Mr. [George] Orwell’s world of (the novel) “1984″?
But in truth, what do these words actually mean? They are just words, because in truth, these people do NOT WANT to diversify, and 3rd world violence does NOT “enrich” a civilised nation. The invaders do not even diversify with other imported “exotic” cultures, thus we see the appearance of Ghetto’s, — sorry — visible-ethnic-minority clusters in many of our decaying major cities as experienced in many of Europe’s once peaceful cities. I repeat … it is a cruel illusion.
If approximately 4,000 of our own people who have been murdered by these ‘Enrichers’ who have been invited into OUR country to “enrich” and share our culture … then it IS an illusion.
The establishment and Police will not warn the people of this silent, murder by stealth of its own people because it smacks of institutionalised racism. The lives of our people are easily expendable and any serious dissent can be kept in check by threats of incarceration; a small price to pay to foster uncertainty upon them to meekly accept this new Muti Culti religion.
If our government is forced to bring out strict laws to enforce this Multi Culti religion, then it’s obvious it is unwanted by its own people. Just as there are strict laws to protect our people against Murder, Rape and Paedophilia, it is just another evil. What makes it even more obscene is that the government that enforce it — are also our own people.
So what is its aim? Like “Winston Smith“ in Orwell’s (novel) prophesies of “1984″ (written in 1948) — I thought I knew — but it is too complex for me to understand. There are too many variables; it is protean in its concept. I sometimes wonder if the government have unleashed a terrible Genie out of the bottle and they now realise that in the very near future they will not be able to control this evil monster, thus we are seeing our security and intelligence services being beefed up.
They are now employing increasing numbers of these same invaders to help warn and combat the threats — which mark my words — will one day turn our streets into 1st world killing grounds.
So where are the violent threats coming from — our own people?
Most certainly not … but from the very people who are part of this multicultural illusion, the armies of the Genie. Keeping the stopper on the bottle would have saved at least 4,000 of our people’s lives. But it just proves who cares? The perpetrators are STILL in power.
The future “Winston Smith” might not be surprised to be stopped in the street one day by a officer in a blue uniform, speaking brokenEnglish, wearing medals and ribbons for devotion and loyalty to the Federation and on his shoulder a identification patch with the letters EQRG (Eurabia Quick Response Group) surrounded by yellow stars. By then, as Orwell’s “Winston Smith” found out much to his consternation, it will be too late, he thought he knew who his enemies were too, but the hidden enemy were his own people. > Source
In one of the more outrageous recent cases of the “pot calling the kettle black”, the blacks-onlyMetropolitan Black Police Association (BPA) has again … accused the Metropolitan Police of London, England, of being “institutionally racist.”
Metropolitan Police officers in London’s Trafalgar Square
This cry of “institutional racism” is nothing else but NON-whites decrying the fact that they tend to be stopped, searched and arrested more often than Whites. The reason for this is, of course, because as a statistical average, NON-whites commit more crime than Whites.
However, rather than admit this obvious fact, NON-white organisations such as the “Metropolitan Black Police Association” and White liberals, will prefer instead … to blame White people. This tactic is used the world over to excuse high NON-white crime rates (in White countries), or even failure to perform properly at any level in western society.
[What’s the percentage (%) of WHITE PEOPLE on Earth? ANSWER.]
The irony of a blacks-only organisation calling another body “institutionally racist” is also lost on these people, who genuinely think that only they have the right to organise along racial grounds. If any London police officials had to set up a “Metropolitan White Police Association” they would be drummed out of the force as “racist.”
According to the black police organisation, “Institutional racism is not about labelling individuals racists, but rather police practice and procedures that bring about disproportionate outcomes for black and minority ethnic communities and police personnel.”
In other words, black members of the force don’t do as well in the tests and courses set out to achieve promotion within the police—and therefore Whites are to blame.
In addition, the BPA has blamed the (White) police for not recruiting enough NON-whites, implying that it is once again White peoples’ fault that blacks, Pakistanis, Chinese and the huge mixture of races in London, shy away from joining law enforcement.
According to the BPA, the “2011 census indicated that over 40% of Londoners were from BME backgrounds, whilst only 10% of MPS police officers were from BME communities.” (Note: Typically, they have their figures wrong. The latest UK census showed that 54% of Londoners were from ‘Black and Minority Ethnic’ –BME—communities).
“These officers disproportionately hug the lower ranks, face significantly slower rates of career progression and are over-represented in disciplinary actions, in comparison to their White counterparts,” the BPA continued.
Note once again, the “blame whitey” phenomenon. Because NON-white police officers commit more internal offenses, and are thus “over-represented in disciplinary action,” it is White peoples’ fault—not that of the offending officers.
This situation, the BPA claims is “unsustainable, as it severely impacts on police legitimacy and more importantly erodes trust and confidence in BME communities.”
The logic is breath-taking, and possibly only the arrogance exceeds its stupidity. The BPA is saying that because NON-white police officers commit more internal offenses than White officers, and do poorly on internal promotional exams, the rest of the NON-white community blames White people for “racism” and therefore does not trust them.
The madness goes on: Superintendent Leroy Logan, chair of the Met BPA (Metropolitan Black Police Association) charitable trust, said … before the (Police) force could consider itself free of “institutional racism“, it must tackle the continuing disproportions in the treatment of minority Londoners.
“The real litmus test is still the vexed issue of stop and search and its disproportionality in black and minority ethnic (BME) communities, because so many people perceive that the police are involved in racial profiling?”
Metropolitan Police Service helmet
A recent review of “stop-and-search policing” in London found that black “youths” are up to six times more likely to be stopped than Whites, and that in “authorised localised stops” under section 60 of the 1994 Public Order Act, NON-whites are 28 times more likely to be stopped.
Once again, this is because the evidence is clear that those communities commit more crime, not because of “White racism.” >Source: Western Spring U.K.
(Added for emphasis are all Bold and underlined words, with added links by ELN Editor)
Throughout history there have always been people who were right, and usually a “majority” that were wrong, on any single issue. Defenders of institutionalized ignorance argue constantly that truth is “relative”, and that they should not be criticized for having their own “opinions”.
Sheople
They use this relativism as a cover for their unwillingness to admit a lack of knowledge. I would ask them if they believe that they are always right? That they have nothing to learn? If the truth is “relative”, if morality and principle are “gray”, then who in their mind has ever been wrong? It would seem that the only people they view as absolutely amiss are those who confront the establishment. Those that question the system they are so addicted to.
What they fail to understand is that their “opinions” were never theirs to hold. What they believe has merely been conditioned into them. They are willing to embrace the system no matter how unjust, because their entire identity is predicated on its continued existence. We do not admonish people necessarily because they are unaware (all of us were unaware at one time or another), but we do admonish them for denying the blatant facts in order to avoid admitting that they are wrong, and that they have perhaps been duped by the establishment. So, what do we call those people who remain willfully ignorant (or comfortably oblivious) in the face of the facts and follow along with the herd (the mainstream) to the detriment of the truth?
We call them sheeple…
The term “sheeple” has quickly become a word that defines an era. It is not just a tool for ridicule, though it does indeed seem to hurt the feelings of the ignorant and unaware, which to my mind, is a good thing (If they can feel shame over their factual inadequacies, then perhaps one day they can be redeemed). No, there is much more going on here…
When one is surrounded by blatant absurdity and total loss; loss of freedom, loss of compassion, loss of humanity, that person needs a way to describe the horror. A way to shed light on the dark insanity of it. A way to remove the barriers of confusion and build a clear path to reason. He needs to quantify the threat, so that he can move beyond it, and towards understanding.
[...]
It is the greatest and most exploitable weakness of man; our willingness to sacrifice anything in order to avoid admitting we know nothing. This is the philosophical slum of the common “sheeple”. It is pathetic, and it is ugly, and it is a rampant plague upon the world in the year of 2013.
Pointed guns, no legal right to entry, no search warrants. Get out of your own homes and put your hands up!! This is America, today! More here.
The time is coming, very soon I believe, when the sub-populous of “sheeple” will be used as cannon fodder to institute change in America on an unprecedented scale. It has happened many times throughout history.
The establishment, seeking unlimited power, brandishes the dimmer subsections of the citizenry like a political Louisville Slugger, swinging them about wildly in an attempt to smash the ideological enemies of the state. Often, the “sheeple” are oblivious to the fact that they are being used as a weapon against liberty, and against truth. They only know that they must participate to “survive”, even if that survival ends up being a hollow and meaningless life.
Institutionalized Laziness
Some “sheeple” are not ignorant because they are unintelligent. Rather, they are ignorant because they refuse to expend any energy in discovering the facts of their world. They have become used to the idea of being “taught”, rather than going out to learn for themselves. It is easier to be told what to think than it is to develop one’s own world view. “Sheeple” often state that they “just want to be left alone”, and “don’t want to think about the troubles of the world”, yet nearly all of them, at the same time, want to feel as though they have an effect on the future. They want the benefits of a sound and balanced society but don’t want to put in the work to make such a society possible. They want “other people” to make the system work, and “other people” are certainly willing to take advantage of sheeple inaction. Tyranny cannot exist unless people willingly hand over their personal responsibilities to the system. “Sheeple” make oligarchy and dictatorship possible.
Arrogance Without Merit
I have met many people in my life that are not fully aware of how their world works or why terrible things happen to them. This by itself is not necessarily bad. If one is able to accept that he needs to learn more, then he has far surpassed most of society in the strength of his character. Unfortunately, sheeple do not share this attitude. They not only lack remedial knowledge on most issues, they are also unwilling to admit it, and, even viciously attack those who DO have substantial information.
Is this due to an inferiority complex? Possibly. They are so invested in the mainstream world view as presented by media entities and government that they take it as gospel. They live the mainstream ideal, but, secretly, they harbor doubts. They know that they do not have the capacity to defend the system if confronted by an intelligent and well-versed opponent, and so, they develop a demeanor of arrogance and contempt for those who question it. This uppity manner is a defense mechanism meant to hide the weakness of their arguments. Combined with Ad hominem attacks, distraction, and physical threats, sheeple try to ward off critics so they do not have to engage in a legitimate debate they know they will lose.
Always Worried What The “Majority” Thinks
“Sheeple” are steeped in the realm of the mainstream. So much so, that they have become nothing but a cog in the machine of the collective mind (or hive mind). Their entire existence is predicated on blind faith in the system. If the system is proven to be flawed, then THEY are proven to be flawed by extension. They will ignore all reason and defend the system wildly, as if trapped by some cult, because their fragile identity is dependent upon the continued prosperity of the establishment.
“Sheeple” are in most cases motivated by nothing but fear. In their early years they likely either caved to the force of peer pressure and learned to diminish their personal pain by constantly conforming to the majority view. Or, they sought inclusion in the majority very early on and became addicted to the power that the collective is able to wield over others. In either case, they never actually questioned whether or not the “majority” was right in its behavior. Instead, they decided at some point in their life that the majority is ALWAYS right … simply because it is the majority.
[...]
Predictable Responses
“Sheeple” are highly predictable two-dimensional creatures. When confronted with their own failings, they will follow a pre-programmed list of responses meant to divert and confuse discussion.
They will claim that “everyone thinks they are smarter than everyone else”, and that really, the “truth is relative”. History does not support this twisted view, however. There are always moments in which some people are morally and intellectually correct, while many others are dangerously misguided. Some people make decisions that lead to chaos and destruction while others make decisions that lead to prosperity and creation. The truth, the cold hard truth, is NOT relative. It is unyielding, it is uncompromising, and it is final. To be successful as human beings requires us to be on the right side of truth more often than we are not. To assume that the truth is “malleable” to our particular desires of the moment is to always be on the wrong side.
“Sheeple” rely primarily on character assassination and belligerent disregard for logic in order to derail debate. They do not attack your position so much as they attack you personally. They scoff, they giggle, they taunt like children, but when it’s all over … they usually say very little of any substance.
Finally, they will use the weapon of majority opinion as a get-out-of-jail-free card, and in most cases this is not a ploy. They really do believe that if the larger percentage of the public accepts a conviction, then that conviction automatically becomes fact. Their goal, therefore, is to constantly ride the wave of majority opinion so that they will always be in a position of “righteousness”. Of course, this way of thinking has in the past led to some of the worst atrocities in recent memory. The collective mind has no concern for individual freedom, including the freedom to live in peace. Physical and psychological violence in the name of conformity is very common in such cultures. >to Full Article
… from NineNews, Justice Betty King says there have been numerous examples of African refugees coming before the (Australian) courts for offences linked to excessive consumption of alcohol.
Economic Refugee from Sudan
She says many young Africans appear to be spending their days drinking (alcohol) because they have nothing to do, and are seemingly dispossessed.
[ELN Editor's Note:Of course, they are "seemingly dispossessed" because these 3rd world illiterates are wholly incompatible to living with White Europeans. They inevitably suffer from the "envy complex" which they can never achieve, so they begin stewing in a cauldron of hatred which eventually boils over, and is unleashed against their White benefactors.
For example, the violent behaviour patterns seen in this video, and perpetrated against ordinary Australians gathered together for a festive occasion, would never have happened had they been WHITE South African refugees. Instead, we have the usual Blackforeign thugs wreaking uncontrolled havoc on taxpaying citizens who help feed and clothe these incongruent invaders.
The TV series “Star Trek” is noted for having a very wise and sensible “Prime Directive” inserted in their script that states:
“As the right of each sentient species to live in accordance with its normal cultural evolution is considered sacred, no Star Fleet personnel may interfere with the healthy development of alien life and culture. Such interference includes the introduction of superior knowledge, strength, or technology to a world whose society is incapable of handling such advantages wisely.
Star Fleet personnel may not violate this Prime Directive, even to save their lives and/or their ship unless they are acting to right an earlier violation or an accidental contamination of said culture. This directive takes precedence over any and all other considerations, and carries with it the highest moral obligation.”
The “contamination” taking place in our own White western cultures — is by no means, accidental. On the contrary… it’s a policy with deliberate intent. Editor]
Justice King said Boronika Gam Hothnyang, 25, not only wasted the life of William Awu when she stabbed him to death, but also wasted her own life.
Both Hothnyang and Mr Awu, 26, had fled war-torn Sudan hoping for a better life in Australia.
[Are you fed-up of having to read, ad nauseam, this journalistic drivel of "hoping for a better life" nonsense? There are over 7,000,000,000 (billion) people who occupy this planet today, yet it seems the 8% White proportion are always obligated to taking care of the ungrateful "others" whose ratio exceeds our own by 12 to 1 . ... ELN Editor]
Hothnyang stabbed Mr Awu, who was her friend, once in the chest as he sat passed out in a chair at her Dandenong home. [LOL! Australia has very strict gun laws, but knives are readily available---ed]
Justice King described the crime as inexplicable, but noted Mr Awu, a talented drawer, had earlier sketched Hothnyang in a caricature in which she was overweight.
The judge said the murder was a tragic waste of life that was all too common.
“It is a disturbing matter to note that you and the persons with whom you were gathered, including the deceased, are not the first, second, third or even fourth of similar groups of Sudanese or other African refugees that have come before the courts on serious charges which can be directly linked to the consumption of large quantities of alcohol,” Justice King said.
“All of this is such a sad reflection on our society that we have groups of seemingly dispossessed men and women who have been brought here as refugees with little or nothing to do except drink their days away.”
More illiterate, 65 IQ Sudanese refugees being prepared to re-locate to AUSTRALIA!?
As is to be expected … NO mention of where they get the money to get drunk while they are doing nothing — the Australian taxpayer.
And, for their welcoming deed in this woman’s case, the murderer has 3 kids that will surely now be taken care of by—you guessed it!—the Australian taxpayer, as she (the murderer) does time in the slammer.
For more on the problems Australia is having with refugees, asylum seekers and illegal aliens visit our Australia category with its 93 previous posts. >Source: Refugee Settlement Watch
******************************************************************************
Latest: Two BLACK Thugs Shoot Baby In Stroller Editor’s Note: If two White teens had fired a bullet into the head of a Black baby, that story would have gone viral across the nation in 2 hours.
Anna TreeOf course, multiculturalism is a cult containing all the religious zeal of promoting salvation!
The word “salvation” implies we are in danger, need help and/or need to be rescued. This is not true! We don’t need multiculturalism, it is no salvation; in fact, it has the opposite affect by destroying and killing us.
Like other cultists, liberalists are willing to die for their faith of multiracialist/moral relativism/political correctness dogmas.
Miscegenation is the suicide of one’s own race. A mixed marriage kills half of one’s genes and one’s image (your descendants are forever different from you). It’s Avraham smashing the idols all over again, although this time around, Whiteness being the false god (or false gods of different white skin tones, eyes colors, hair color, with or without freckles, etc).
Liberalists can redeem themselves by brainwashing their kids to miscegenate, or at least adopt NON-white children to take the place of a White child. Liberalism’s martyrs are not those beaten or killed by blacks or muslims. Their best saints and martyrs willingly commit cultural and/or racial suicide, and by helping, converting, adopting or marrying other races for the glory of the liberalist faith, or strongly promote liberalism by brainwashing new victims, or by giving money to their “glorious” cause.
Liberalists themselves may not be ready to be directly tortured, executed or killed, but, nevertheless, they willingly choose to have no children, adopt NON-white children or miscegenate … same result.
Their liberalized actions, whether in elections, opinions, pathological altruism, or through their jobs – from the judge who frees illegal immigrant criminals to the equally indoctrinated teacher who brainwashes our kids — puts others in harm’s way. Usually, those ”others” are poorer Whites who don’t have the money to live in White neighborhoods, or send their kids to White schools, etc, and notably poorer because their jobs were outsourced to NON-white countries through liberalism, or given away to NON-whites, or illegal foreign nationals in their own towns and cities.
Other religious aspects: evangelism, “new” world view, new institutions or converting existing universities into temples, new morals, quasi witchhunts/inquisitions of dissidents, censuring books, etc… and, blind faith and the concept of “salvation”.
Liberalism is a set of beliefs suggesting that ”all races are equal“, racial diversity is “sacred“, Whites are “evil“, race-mixing is the ultimate purpose of the universe, and so on. >Source
The boy was a victim of what the liberals call ‘diversity’, which is the code name for the hatred of the White race, and the worship of the colored races. Our children are being taught to hate themselves, and to expect a life of torture at the hands of the savage races of color. And a false universalism in the Christian churches is responsible for the suicide of the White race: because the church men have called the love of one’s kith and kin, the only type of love that can connect us to Him, ‘racist and heinous’. Without their racial backbone the European people are without a soul”:
‘There is nothing remotely noble about multiracialism as the Press would have it [ed. I would add “as the clergy would have it” as well]. On the contrary, it is loathsome and sinister. It is not Godly but Devilish: an offense against the Creator. To espouse it means that one despises one’s own race, one’s own wife and children, and their children in turn. This means that one cannot venerate or respect anything at all. To espouse multiracialism is not evidence of love, but of the very opposite of it.’ -Anthony Jacob
“That is the crux of the matter. Diversity is based on the hatred of one’s own people, one’s own parents, wife, children, and grandchildren.
A cousin of mine, on a recent visit, was waxing nostalgic about her parents, her grandparents, and the love that once was there when they were alive. She talked sadly of her nephew who had married outside his own race, and wondered what was happening to the world. But then she tried to be a good American“: ‘Oh well, I guess it’s all for the best, we have to adjust to progress.’
“Why must we adjust?” I asked her. “I have no intention of adjusting.”
(Toronto) City Hall’s vote Thursday night to reaffirm Toronto’s status of “sanctuary city” further legitimizes a section of society that has chosen to live outside it.
Night view of the Toronto City Hall (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Men and women who are euphemistically called “undocumented migrants” will continue to enjoy access to city services, underwritten by you, the taxpayer, without fear of their status being revealed to authorities. You know, those pesky authorities called border enforcement agents at street level and the Federal Department of Immigration at the national level. The very people whose job it is to ensure that those (foreigners) living in Canada are doing so because they are legally entitled to, rather than choosing to because the weather suits their clothes. Or their whim, their fancy or because it is all just too hard to return home (their own countries) and enter through the proper channels, like hundreds of thousands of legal migrants do every year. [Report Illegal Immigrants] Just why City Hall, with all the other manifest problems on its plate, has chosen to challenge Ottawa in this way … is uncertain.
Still, that’s what happens when you have the politics of personal vanity trumping the natural rule of law.
If it feels good and panders to a vocal minority, then just do it, regardless that it also untethered to the facts.
[...]
“Canada is an open and generous country,” Jason Kenney (Minister of Immigration) said. “All we ask is you respect our law … or go back to your country.
Jason Kenney, Canadian Minister of Immigration
“If you want to (legally) come to Canada , get in the same line as everyone else. Make a regular visa application.” Kenney touched on a fact often disregarded by those who would ignore the law and welcome every illegal immigrant who expressed a desire to tap into the full range of Toronto’s generous city services. “Legal immigrants to Canada have very little tolerance of those who cut the queue and cheat the system.” >Full Report
EMPLOYMENT EQUITY (Affirmative Action in the U.S.) was introduced to Canada in 1986 on the recommendation of a report chaired by Rosalie Abella, at that time a (province of Ontario) judge.
Visible Minorities of Canada (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Her report resulted in Employment Equity laws to promote Preferential Hiring in Canada’s public sector.
That campaign has since been followed by a similar campaign in Canada’s private sector. As a result of her work, probably hundreds of thousands of visible-minorities (NON-white foreigners) have been granted PREFERENCE in hiring practises.
(“Preferential Hiring” is code-speak for ANTI-WHITE hiring practices- Editor)
In a reply to Abella in 1998, Canadian academic Dr. Martin Loney published “The Pursuit of Division : Race, Gender and Preferential Hiring in Canada”.
The main point that Martin Loney made in the book was that Abella lacked empirical evidence for her conclusions. For example, Loney stated that some visible minority groups were actually doing better than White Canadians, so it was incorrect to conclude that Visible Minorities suffered from “systemic discrimination”.
Furthermore, many Canadians who are aware of these effects would say that Employment Equity (E.E.) legislation has created a much more serious problem … because it has institutionalized “systemic discrimination” AGAINST Canadian-born White males.
In summary, the report done by Rosalie Abella has created a Canadian Holocaust. Its inaccurate conclusions have been used to elicit guilt fromCanadians, to justify Canada’s unnecessary high immigration intake, and to intimidate those who question that high intake. Its effects may dwarf the effects of the European Holocaust which Abella’s parents escaped. For the record, Abella was born in a Displaced Person’s (DP) Camp in Stuttgart, Germany on July 1, 1946. Her (JEWISH) family arrived in Canada as refugees in 1950.
Who is behind all this enforced “multiculturalism”??
To make up for the damage that Employment Equity (EE) laws have done, Canada needs to conduct a sweeping investigation to determine the number of people who have been hired because of these ill-considered laws. This legislation has been implemented by not only federal, provincial and municipal governments, but also by much of Canada’s private sector.
As an introduction, we present a few examples (from data provided by The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat) of the effects of E.E. in Canada’s federal civil service.
As of March 31 1999, about 13 years after E.E. laws began, the Public Service of Canada (PSC) employed 178,340 people. From that total, 91,856 were women, 5124 were Aboriginals, 8137 were people with disabilities, and 10,557 were persons in a Visible Minority Group.
No data was available to show the number of women and other groups employed before 1999, but the fact that women in 1999 comprised over half of the total number of federal employees is striking. However, it was already evident that Visible Minorities (most of whom were probably newly-arrived IMMIGRANTS) were being granted more preferences than Aboriginalsand the Disabled … of whom most are Canadian-born.
As of March 31, 2011, the Public Service of Canada (PSC) employed 202,631. Of that total, 111,051 were women, 9486 were Aboriginal, 11,388 were Persons with Disabilities, and 22,998 were Visible Minorities.
It is worth noting that from 1999 to 2011, the PSC increased in size by 24,291. It is even more worth noting that Visible Minority employees INCREASED by 12,441 … or about 50% of the total increase.
This significant increase is probably a result of a concerted effort by the Public Service of Canada (the PSC) to hire Visible Minorities. It should be noted that the Visible Minority hiring is possibly even larger than reported because Visible Minority employees – in applying for a PSC job – are not required to declare that they belong to a Visible Minority group.
Again, the raw numbers also show that Visible Minorities increased their representation far greater than Aboriginals and Persons with Disabilities. .
Many Canadians would agree that the P.S.C. should make a very strong effort to hire Canada’s own Aboriginals, and its Disabled CITIZENS. However, many would also agree that giving preference to Visible Minorities (VM) who are FOREIGN-born, compounds the first mistake of bringing these IMMIGRANTS to Canada.
This is “placing the cart before the horse”, when a just-arrived FOREIGNER from some 3rd-world hell-hole, lands a solid job in OUR Canadian government … while an under-employed, Canadian-born private sector employee has the monotonous task of running this immigrant’s groceries through a checkout counter at a minimum-wage job in a Canadian grocery store!
Visit any provincial or federal government office in a major Canadian city, and count the number of Visible-Minorities working there. You’ll be unpleasantly surprised.
Most Canadians correctly believe that access to a job is an essential part of being born here. Similarly, they think that Canada should not be acting as an employment agency for the world’s unemployed people. By doing this, Canada inevitably DENIES jobs to our own Canadian-born citizens.
Another major concern that Canadians have about Employment-Equity is (state) security. It is common sense that Canada should be very cautious about people who come from countries that are interested in acquiring secret and strategic information about Canadian high tech and resource businesses, or information on Canada and its NATO allies. But there is little evidence that Canada has exercised any caution is employing these (foreign-born) immigrants in sensitive departments.
For example, it is worthwhile noting that the percentage of Visible Minorities (VM) employed in departments such as CITIZENSHIP and IMMIGRATION is high. This department makes major immigration policy decisions, issues visas, and is supposed to uphold the interests of Mainstream Canada.
Yet, the percentage of Visible Minorities is 18.8% (850 of a total of 4514 employees). How much is the presence of these VM employees stifling the expression of very real concerns that mainstream Canadian Citizenship and Immigration employees have?
In the PASSPORT Department, where fraud has been a serious problem in the past, the percentage of Visible Minorities is 19.5% (478 of a total of 2447 employees).
Anyone having visited the Richmond (British Columbia) PASSPORT OFFICE will be shocked to see that employees are overwhelmingly, and probably newly-arrived Chinese IMMIGRANTS themselves. Has this increased the potential for fraud?
ONLY Canadian-born citizens should be employed in such sensitive positions as in our CANADIAN PASSPORT offices or Canada’s CITZENSHIP and IMMIGRATION ministry!Just these two examples would find favour with the 6th Century Chinese General SUN TZUshould he had strategized a method of infiltration into a foreign nation. >ELN Editor
On Canada’s IMMIGRATION and REFUGEE BOARD, where crucial decisions are made to give foreigners refugee status, and eventual permission to bring in very large numbers of potentially fake relatives, the percentage of Visible Minorities is 26.8% (223 of a total of 833 employees). Has ANYONE asked a question about this?
That would be considered ‘racist‘ to question anything of the sort … from guilt-infested White Canadians!
The percentage of Visible Minorities in department of HUMAN RESOURCES and SKILLS DEVELOPMENT may seem small at 12.7% … but also note this translates to 2935 of a total of 23,092 employees. This large number is part of a department which allowed about 400,000 Temporary FOREIGN Workers (TFW’s) to work in CANADA in 2012.
In the past few months, Canadians have learned that this department has permitted mainland Chinese miners to be stealthily imported to fill T.F.W. jobs which several hundred Canadian applicants were DENIED. This case should make clearer the point … that employers are probably widely abusing the TFW program. Have some (ETHNIC) employees with ethnic connections to these employers assisted some of these employers?
Gullible WHITE Canadians would never think otherwise in our dumbed-downed, political-correct society.
The percentage of Visible Minorities employed in the CANADA BORDER SERVICES AGENCY (CBSA) is also 12.7%, but the raw numbers are very high (1750 out of a total of 13,831 employees).
This department is responsible for investigating IMMIGRATION fraud. It is no exaggeration to say that immigration fraud is rampant, mainly because the backgrounds of most of the immigrants who enter Canada are not being checked.
We know when fraud is reported, this department (CBSA) does not even bother to investigate a very large number of cases. Has this department ever asked the question whether loyalties of some of its (foreign-born) employees lean more to their country of origin … than to Canadians?
How many unemployed/under-employed and qualified Canadian-born citizens have been DENIED these government jobs in our own public sector just to fill a quota with NON-white FOREIGNERS, you may ask. (Just ONE EXAMPLE)
These are “not jobs that Canadians refused to do”, yet these sought-after jobs are unfairly doled out to people whose place of residence was in INDIA, CHINA, PAKISTAN, the Phillipines or other 3rd world countries until just a few years ago. (Another EXAMPLE) Plus, there’s 5,000 additional legal immigrants (87% visible-minorities) arriving every week!
Aside from those special government jobs that should always be restricted to Canadian-born citizens, maybe then, we could offer Canada’s foreign-born residents an open invitation to OUR government job sector, BUT only after having had legal residence for a minimum of 12 years! Although, before even that happens, only qualified Canadian-born citizens must (not should) be given top priority in any government job placement in their OWN country!
In a reverse scenario, their countries’ often corrupt governments would never grovel to “political-correctness” by hiring foreign-born Whites to work in their passport offices, or their border control stations, or their international airports, or their immigration departments … if their own citizens were available.AND … they would be right to do so!
ELN Editor
In summary … a sweeping investigation of the entire Employment Equity program would give Canadians a much better picture of what has actually occurred, and probably produce convincing evidence that the Visible Minority section of E.E. should NEVER have been implemented … and should be ended A.S.A.P. – Source
Video insertions, plus (Parenthesized), CAPITALIZED, underlined , italicized words and commentary are by ELN editor for highlighting purposes.
White People amount to only 8% of the World’s Population, and just 2% are WHITE women of child-bearing age!
[Proportion of Visible Minorities for ALL of CANADA, 1981-2001--Stats Canada]
(June 2013 is the release-date for Canada’s Visible-Minority numbers compiled in the 2011 census. V.M.s are expected to reach an unprecedented 19% of Canada’s population of 35 million people.
White Canadian numbers are REDUCED in direct proportion to these INCREASED percentages. It took only 3 decades for Canada’s traditional 95%White majority to fall to about 80%. Your White children and future grandchildren are now expected to be a minority race themselves before the end of this century – if these current immigration trends are not stopped immediately.
There may be hope, if more Europeans are awakened.
The video at the bottom of this post is from an earlier time before Marxist-inspired “political-correctness” began suppressing freedom of speech.
Muhammad Ali (born Cassius Clay, Jr.) is a most noteworthy man when speaking very candidly about miscegenation in the 1971 BBC interview .
The White British interviewer didn’t capture the basic essence in this race-mixing dialogue with Ali, and instead assumed the role of appearing noblesse oblige who failed to “keep it real“.
I use the term “noblesse oblige” loosely and with a derisive tone … meaning he played a condescending role tainted with an accepted hypocritical stance before a public audience.
“Noblesse oblige” is a French noun sometimes used to imply that people with wealth, power, or prestige have certain responsibilities attached to their influence. Then the false premise of “white guilt” is added to the mix, and extended towards “victim” minority races living in White societies. (In reality, NON-whites account for 92% of the world’s 7 BILLION people, so why should the remaining 8% White-minority race harbor such foolish notions as “white guilt“??)
During one segment of the interview, Ali may have suppressed the urge of calling the BBC host a sycophantic White hypocrite … but, he only resorts to “you’re on the show, you gotta say that”. Pathetically, the BBC host becomes immediately defensive — and unconvincingly — blurts out “that’s not true” while casting a glance at his live audience in a desperate move for moral support.
Imagine the scene if Ali had ensnared the BBC interviewer with this question: … “would you marry a black woman and subsequently spawn a few mulattoes that didn’t quite share your skin tone“? The White hypocrite would have unquestioningly answered “yes” knowing full-well he was lying, and with a straight face. White liberal hypocrites will always command that you “do as I say, not as I do“.
Imagine a White man having spoken as honestly as Muhammad Ali did in 1971 — or, especially today. There’s no doubt he’d be repeatedly maligned with slurs of “racist” “racist”.
After viewing the 3 minute video below, check out these examples of misplaced altruism … or is that competitive altruism tinged with a healthy dose of narcissism, rather than any genuine concern for those “poor victims” they purport to “save”?? Then, again, perhaps it’s the latest Hollywood-craze designed to reinforce guilt-ridden Whites into following tinsel town’s latest fashion statement.
The word “racism” is a weapon which works on an emotional level to keep the peoples of the world focused on an illusion. Until the last century, the word “racism” didn’t even exist. The word has become another tool of our oppressors, but what does it really mean?
To the non-thinking liberal, the word “racism” provokes feelings of anger at perceived oppression, resulting due to skin colour. This, of course, is exactly what the International Enemy wishes to convey. The powers-that-be have so crafted their politically-correct words of warfare, that the brain-washed liberals who populate much of the West, have come to believe that only NON-Europeans (“NON-whites”) can be oppressed — and thus — that Europeans can be the only people capable of mistreating others due to racial identity. This — like all aspects of “Political Correctness” — is absolute nonsense.
When liberals use the word “racism”, they unconsciously think of hostile actions founded on a belief in “racial supremacy”.
They conjure up, in their own minds, images of hooded (White) Europeans in the USA wearing the robes of the Ku Klux Klan, burning crosses and lynching Africans. This imagery leads to anger, and is focused entirely upon anyEuropeans who dare question the “wisdom” of multiculturalism. Leftists don’t even consider the fact that many non-Europeans also have no desire to see their people destroyed in the multi-culti ‘melting pot.’
For liberals, the plight of the people of Tibet is a tragedy. Indeed it is.
However, the people who chant “Free Tibet“, and who campaign to have the Chinese withdraw from that occupied nation, recoil in horror at the suggestion that all colonisation should be ended wherever it occurs. The occupied territories in Europe are of absolutely no interest to the wilfully blind liberal bigots, who can only perceive tyranny when the victims have non-White skin.
If Tibet was a European land, the liberals would be shrieking hatred for the indigenous population who wish to hold on to their identity. Those who rejoiced at the end of the British Empire in India idolise those who fought to make the British quit India and restore that land to its people; but they would happily lynch those who argue that the colonists from Pakistan who have swamped many English cities should quit Europe!
Liberals have been poisoned by the ideology of the International enemy, to the point where they have become consumed by self-hatred; which, to use their own term, is nothing but ‘racism’ – racial hatred of their own kind. [ ... ]
However, there is one people which stands out from the rest of humanity; a people led by lunatics who not only believe in Racial Supremacy, but who believe in an all-powerful invisible entity which hates everybody except them, and which will deliver all humanity into slavery to serve these megalomaniacs. That one people — does not come from Europe! >continue to Full Article
United Nations, Human Rights Charter, Article 19 states: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”
[Most people] “confuse the dreary recitation of politically correct gibberish with sensitivity that they think they have arrived at through their own value clarification”. –Tomislav Sunic
"Rather than love, than money, than fame, give me TRUTH." — Henry David Thoreau
"Happiness is not the goal of existence, but the byproduct of a life well lived and the purpose of life is TRUTH... not pleasure".
"For most people, the desire not to deviate too far from the herd, prevents them from telling the truth they really feel inside. What would the neighbors think?" -- John Kaminski
Current Weather
~~~~~ ELLIOT LAKE NEWS & VIEWS is a Blog helping to slay the many-headed dragon of "political correctness" with the effective weapon called TRUTH.
Subjects pertaining to mass 3rd-world immigration, multi-culturalism and racial identity are are given special priorities here, and from which material you may either accept or reject at your personal discretion.
Opinions are accepted without ad hominem attacks or insults. Personal responses to any commentary or questions will be kept to a bare minimum due to time constraints.
Miscellaneous
> All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed.
Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer
German philosopher (1788 -1860)
The truth that makes men free is for the most part the truth which men prefer not to hear.
“In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” -Orwell
To get the oil price, please enable Javascript.
![[Most Recent Charts from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_usoz_4.gif)
