ELLIOT LAKE News

Political INcorrect Constructs Arranged To Awaken Slumbering Minds…

Archive for the category “racism”

Leftists/Conservatives Equally Guilty

By Vanishing American

English: Assemblyman Rory Lancman, Public Advo...

Assemblyman Rory Lancman, Public Advocate Bill De Blasio, and New York City Councilman Brad Lander.

Both Sides Do This

The left-wing columnist named Richard Cohen is being pummeled by some of his liberal brethren for making certain observations about Bill De Blasio, New York City mayor-elect, and his family. This is causing Schadenfreude by some on the pro-White right.

But this is just what we see on the ‘respectable right‘, where they police conservatives and Whites, in general, to find any evidence of ‘racist‘ speech or actions. I would expect that most of the media leftists who are calling for Cohen’s head are White or Whitish. So this is just another case of Whites turning on each other to prove their own virtue and innocence regarding these radioactive racial issues.

This is just a consequence of ‘diversity‘, this mandated and enforced state of living amongst Others. We cannot discuss freely amongst ourselves lest some holier-than-thou fellow White excoriates us for not toeing the PC (political-correct) line.

Diversity leads to conflict among the people of a host nation which has many people of disparate groups living within their territory. Some people, for whatever reason, will defend unknown outsiders in preference to their own kin and neighbors, or even family members.

As it stands now, blacks are the people who have the most advocates and militant defenders amongst Whites. Ever since the Civil Rights Revolution, Whites have been subtly and not-so-subtly mobilized to defend blacks, particularly, in a knee-jerk fashion against even the slightest criticism. Whites defend blacks more ardently than they would ever defend their own, perhaps even their own family, as witness the case of the late Amy Biehl and her indoctrinated parents.

Suppose, just suppose … that some impartial alien from another planet were to observe our society. What would such a stranger make of the situation amongst our people, where so many of us behave like programmed robots in offering a defense of those who are hostile and inimical to us … often at the expense of ourselves, our kin and neighbors?

But, we have no such impartial observer to tell us how bizarre and unnatural this behavior is; the allegedly objective people we call “psychologists” are of no use because they, too, are under the PC spell — and ”spell” is not an inappropriate word. The philosophers and clergy also are infected with this strange xenophilia, and are also prone to join the hordes who go around calling “racist!” … in response to any mention of unmentionable truths.

Republican and Democrat are also infected with this mania, or (are) under this programming, and one side is only better in only the slightest sense. Almost everyone is part of this xenomania to a greater or lesser extent; Republicans manifest it in different ways, and cater to different ”others”. But only a few seem to have been mysteriously inoculated against it, and they are the only ones who offer any hope in this situation.

In the meantime Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, other, practically all the politicians and media are party to this mutual witch-hunting. When will enough be enough?  >Source: http://vanishingamerican.blogspot.ca/2013/11/both-sides-do-this.html

[For added emphasis, links, underlined, bolded and italicized words by ELN Editor]

Lib/Leftists Are “Racists”

Also Read:

Toronto Police “Losing Face”

Muslim Violence in Canada

Muslims in Canada

**************

Muslim Immigration

Jane Gardener Speaks Her Mind

Has DENMARK Learned a Lesson?

…and, should the Danish people tolerate this type of raucous behaviour from foreigners demonstrating on their city’s ancient streets for causes they could probably care less?? These intrusive foreigners have accomplished nothing with these fruitless demonstrations, but have earned the wrath of their Danish benefactors who feed, house and clothe these ungrateful malcontents.

 

Did YOU Know?

A Black family born in a white-ruled nation is forced to live in poverty-stricken conditions because:

1) … the unemployed father is DENIED his sovereign right to lawfully seek employment in the nation’s job market because of his swarthy complexion. “Employment-equity/affirmative action” exists to serve only the White majority population … not the Black minority.

2)… the Black family is DENIED access to social welfare benefits and forced to live “rough” on city streets, or in makeshift, unsanitary squatter camps without running water, nor with proper toilet facilities, or they’re forced to live in rural barns alongside pigs and other farm animals.

Additionally, and further out into the country’s expanse of rural farmland, hard-working Black farmers and their families are systematically being slaughtered to death without remorse by marauding, blood-thirsty White murderers plundering their isolated homes. The Black Women and children are often raped and tortured in the most gruesome, gut-wrenching manner.

Now, you’d be correct to ask … something is not quite right here?!

That’s because NONE of this described scenario is true!

But – reverse the racial components — and you’ll discover the events described … are actually occurring to White people in today’s Black-run South Africa.

In fact, many North American and European household pets (cats and dogs) are treated better, and enjoy a higher standard of living than what impoverished White people receive in South Africa.

You will not find these noteworthy stories reported in western newspapers, or by listening to your television news reader … so read on and validate this deliberately suppressed news for yourself.

**************************************


***************************************

(Note: The term “Afrikaners” (Boer) refers to WHITE PEOPLE born, raised, or living in South Africa … whose first language is Afrikaans and whose original ancestors were Dutch Europeans … the very White people responsible for inventing, building and successfully establishing the country itself.)

White South Africans Fighting Back!

Read:

South African Killing Fields

“Kill the Boer, Kill the Farmer”

South African Child SEX-SLAVES

****************************

White South Africans DENIED Jobs

****************************

White GENOCIDE In South Africa

South Africa – GENOCIDAL Slaughter-House

*******************************

South African BLACK Empowerment

… other South African news items
are found in the “Category” link
in the right side-bar, or click HERE.

For more updated South African
news items on this subject
matter, check out:

http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.ca/

The Value of “Money”

From DailyKenn.com

How Money Works

Marxism Utilizes Multiculturalism To Manipulate Our Economy

The original money was labor that produced something of value.

One neighbor would help the other hoe his garden, and the other would help him patch his chicken coop. Productive labor was the original exchange medium.

The red color of beets comes from betalain pig...

Red Beets

The stuff produced by labor was as valuable as the work itself. One would spend a day in the field raising beets. Then, when he needed eggs, he would trade ten beets for ten hen’s eggs from his neighbor.

Stuff — such as beets and eggs — was the exchange medium that represented productive labor, which is defined as the production of marketable goods or services.

Gold Key, weighing one kilogram is used to acc...

Precious metals (gold and silver) eventually became the preferred item to exchange. It could be weighed precisely, couldn’t have an unexpected rotten center, and couldn’t break on the way home. Furthermore, it could be saved indefinitely.

Kings began controlling the circulation of precious metals. They would forge pre-weighed units as ‘coins‘ and have their image stamped on each one to validate authenticity. One coin would be worth five beets or a dozen eggs, or a day in the field. Everyone knew the value of each coin.

Productive labor was the standard that gave coins value. A coin represented the stuff that represented productive labor.

Banks and governments that owned and controlled gold and silver began offering notes that represented their coins that represented stuff that represented productive labor. Notes issued by the British government were called pounds, an etymological throwback to the weight of sterling silver. American notes were called dollars.

Banks then allowed checks that represented notes that represented coins that represented stuff that represented productive labor.

Banks have now gone a step further. They allow electronic bytes that represent… What?

Economists consider the money supply to consist of fiat money, that is, it’s backed by nothing.

Checks are nearly obsolete. Notes (dollars) are used less frequently. Gold and silver coins have long since been displaced by cheap metals, and the gold standard that underpinned the value of currency is no longer applied.

• The Productive Labor Standard still stands

When you access your bank account via the Internet to view the digital numbers on your computer screen, those electronic bytes represent the dollar notes that once represented precious metal coins that represented stuff that represents productive labor.

Your productive labor is literally converted to digital units displayed on your computer screen as recorded on the bank’s computer.

If we suppose those digital numbers represent gold and silver stacked up in the bank’s vaults (or stacks of paper that once had the same value as gold and silver), we are mistaken. They represent our productive labor.

When someone uses a government-issued EBT card, they are purchasing goods and services with someone else’s productive labor. That productive labor was taken from the worker and redistributed to a non-worker.

• The Value of Productive Labor

The value of the electronic bytes that we send over the Internet is determined by mutual consent. The value of currency is actually nothing more than the total consensus of those who use it as a means of trade, sans tampering by the Federal Reserve.

That mutual consent, no longer based upon a standard of precious metal, is still — ultimately — driven by productive labor and the value of the stuff it produces.

The standard that endues money its value is the productive labor it represents. It doesn’t matter if the medium of exchange is beets, eggs, bits of gold, slips of paper with presidents’ heads printed thereon, or computer bytes. Productive labor is, ultimately, the underlying medium of exchange. When productive labor fails, economies fail.

Flag of the Soviet Union

Flag of the former Soviet Union (USSR)

The failure of Marxist theory in the old Soviet Union is that it squashed the profit motive that drives productive labor. When Russians stopped producing stuff, their economy floundered. It also explains why geographical regions such as Detroit and Haiti languish in economic depravity and disparity: The people who live in those areas are not efficient in productive labor.

Productive labor is now, and has always been, the medium of exchange. That medium of exchange can be rendered ineffective by government tampering, as it was in the Soviet Union, or by the innate inability of a population to produce goods through labor, as seen in Detroit and Haiti. Conservatives are correct to pin the blame on Marxism for the economic failure in the USSR. They are incorrect to pin the blame on Marxist dogma in Detroit and Haiti.

• Manipulating money with multiculturalism

Peoples of sub-Saharan Africa do not suffer in poverty for lack of natural resources. Rather, their economic failure is due to their inability to engage in productive labor.

The reason Mexico, Central America, and South America fall behind North America economically is because the people who populate those regions are not as competent in their ability to affect productive labor.

Note, for example, that the Falkland Islands have the highest standard of living in South America in spite of the fact that the islands have the highest cost of living. How is that possible? It is because the people who inhabit the islands are genetically predisposed to be more efficient and effective in intelligent productive labor. Think of the Falklands as an island of intelligence, or a bit of North America existing in South America.

The evidence is empirical and, therefore, logically undeniable: Some people groups engage in less efficient productive labor and, therefore, have less stuff. The disparity in living standards may not be caused by a lack of physical labor, but a deficiency in intellect that constrains both innovation and the ability to engage in the most efficient use of labor. In short, simple labor trumps laziness, productive labor trumps simple labor, and intelligent productive labor trumps mere productive labor.

Such thoughts are anathema to Marxism. Its moral sensitivities demand that we all should possess the same amount of stuff.

Marxism loathes economic disparities because it confuses disparities with depravities. The Marxist mantra is that the obliteration of disparity will erase depravity. Granted, such thinking is idiotic, but that’s what they believe. Still, Marxism can’t deny the obvious fact that certain people groups are innately more efficient at productive labor and are, therefore, wealthier.

A portrait of Karl Marx.

A portrait of Karl Marx

Though severely crippled in Russia, Marxism still prevails in the marketplace of ideas, particularly in the West. Void of reason or logic, it seeks to appeal directly to the innate altruism of the most productive people group — White people — by convincing us that using such phrases as “the most productive people group” — though painfully obvious — is somehow immoral. The quest of Marxism, then, is to displace our cognizance of reality through emotional mind manipulation. If Marxism can’t convert us intellectually, it will convert us emotionally. And it is succeeding.

The ideology of Marxist moralism thrives as cultural Marxism and serves as the gateway to economic Marxism.

• Thinking requires thinking

The ultimate Marxist objective is to erase economic disparity. There stands a seemingly insurmountable obstructive barrier that prevents Marxism from achieving its ideal of economic parity: Lots of smart White people.

Without the benefit of a deadly virus that would affect only peoples of European descent, Marxism favors an assault on the collective mindset of White folks.

Given its propensity for mind manipulation and comprehension of collectivist thought, Marxism has set about to dislodge the rational-thinking barrier from the masses of White Americans and replace it with reality-denying neurosis. And again … it is succeeding.

Marxism cannot effectively appeal to the intelligence of individual White people because its premise, as earlier noted, is blatantly idiotic. Rather, Marxism bypasses White intelligence and appeals to our emotional center which, when activated, nearly always overrides our intellect. The outcome is predictable: In spite of our intelligence, we respond like thoughtless, irrational dotes. We have, in fact, surrendered to the emotional appeal of Marxism.

• Protecting the productive class

The emotional bulldozers that raze the intellectual structures embedded in the brains of White Americans include guilt (White privilege), shame (often termed ‘white supremacy’), and dubiety (what Judge Learned Hand described as ‘that ever-gnawing inner doubt as to whether you’re right.’)

We have allowed the media to apply mental agitation to change our minds. We no longer think rationally … we think emotionally.

The reality that White people have delivered boatloads (literally) of innovation that has enhanced the lives of billions of Non-whites is never acknowledged. Why? Because that acknowledgement is a function of the intellect. Intelligence works against the Marxist mantra. The fact that the displacement of White innovation with the Marxist mantra will be devastating to Non-whites is never considered. Again, such thinking requires thinking. And thinking destroys Marxist myths.

[Read: It's A Wonderful Race]

• Relation between ego and economics

The most efficient bulldozer that displaces rational thinking among White Americans is often overlooked. It is Saul Alinsky’s Rule Number Four which states, “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

Our egos seldom operate concurrently with our intellects. Ridicule attacks our egos and prods us to take defensive postures that defy reason. White Americans would eagerly chuck Western culture under the bus rather than endure the humiliation of being falsely ridiculed as “racists”.

We fear and despise ridicule because its negative social ramifications are often severe. No one wants to associate with a person who is inflicted with social cholera. The effect of ridicule is stigmatization that isolates one from others and limits their influence. Hence the term, “cooties.”

The end analysis is that White Americans emotionally adapt to Marxism by adopting such nonsense as Affirmative Action and the multiple forms of government-forced integration that undermine the innovative productive labor that is the standard of our free-market economy.

• Applied intelligence trumps emotional manipulation

Our defenses include a simple awareness that emotionalism is a sorry replacement for intelligence, and that rational thinking is, in the end, superior to the recoil inherent to assaults on our egos through the ploy of ridicule.

It is incumbent upon us, and our prodigy, to defend both our freedom of association and our free market economy where the innovative and productive labor standard is the most efficient means to deliver prosperity, well-being, and enhanced lives to all.

To do otherwise is abject racism.  >http://dailykenn.blogspot.ca

(For added emphasis, all underlined, bolded words and links by ELN Editor)

Also Read:

“I Am a WHITE Man!”

“White Pride” DENIED Trademark

******************************

Understanding Money

Economic Plan of Germany’s NSDAP

S.O.S. – Saving Our Selves


For us!

************************************************
Against us!

************************************************

Also Read:

Dispossessing  White Europeans

Our Land, Our Culture!

Telling It, Like It Is!

**************

Racial Diversity, NOT!

Racial Diversity – The CON Game

**************************

The Betrayal of Canada

South Africa – Blacks vs Whites

by Alex Newman

Even as the world’s most prominent expert on genocide warns that South Africa’s European-descent Afrikaner (White) population is on the verge of government-linked extermination, the virulently racist U.S.-based “New Black Panther Party” [had] a delegation visiting the so-called “Rainbow nation” — a country now ruled by a president who openly sings about murdering Whites.

English: South Africa (orthographic projection)

Country of SOUTH AFRICA

The N.B.P.P. (New Black Panther Party) and its leadership have regularly called for genocide against White South Africans as well, so critics of the visit are expressing alarm, concerned that the officially recognized hate group is agitating for further ethnic cleansing while collaborating with genocidal elements within the regimes ruling South Africa and Zimbabwe.

[Read: Did YOU Know?]

On the N.B.P.P.’s official website, the New Black Panthers boast about their “historic” trip to Marxist-ruled Zimbabwe and South Africa, which the anti-white and anti-Semitic organization refers to as “Azania.”

During broadcasted conference calls about the visit posted online, members and leaders of the group were caught plotting to accelerate the elimination of European-descent South Africans from their homeland. On the call, participants claimed they would “raise up a black army” and offer military training, bragging about collaborating with people who have murdered Whites, and calling for more racist killings.

The NBPP did not return a request for comment from The New American. However, according to a statement released online, the vaguely outlined purposes of the visit, apparently include creating a better future, as well as uniting African and black countries. In reality, as the group’s publicly available radio shows and frequent genocidal remarks demonstrate, the true purpose of the ongoing visit is more likely to help pursue the ultimate extermination of all European-descent Africans from the region.

Original caption: President of Zimbabwe Robert...

President of Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe

The official NBPP statement, which was filled with spelling and grammar mistakes, also indicated that the “home coming visit” was being coordinated with the All-African People’s Revolutionary Party (A-APRP) and brutal dictator Robert Mugabe’sZimbabwe African National Union – Patriotic Front” (ZANU–PF). The socialist so-called “Pan African Congress” also played a role in arranging the trip, which includes NBPP members from various countries including the United States and goes from March 19 until the 27th.

This is not just a visit but a historic journey that may UNITE AFRICAN/BLACK Nation’s [sic],” the group said on its website. “It is a visit in which, 20 and 30 years from now, men and women will speak about it and write of it [sic]. To all my brothers and sisters we ask each and everyone [sic] of you to give your full support to make this historic journey a success, wherever you are, support us spiritually, physically, especially financially [sic] if you can please contact and Support the Revolutionary Roots tour 2013 [sic].”

Critics and Afrikaner activists, however, are frightened by the “historic” visit, pointing to the NBPP’s history of calling for the extermination of whites — something that, according to Genocide Watch, is already in the planning phases in South Africa, probably with official help from the ruling African National Congress (ANC) and South African Communist Party (SACP) regime.

In Zimbabwe, White farmers have already been eliminated under the Mugabe regime, oftentimes enduring barbaric torture and murder … as the despot and his minions sought to “redistribute” the wealth. Today, the nation is starving to death, dependent on international aid after the economy imploded.

As late as last year, the NBPP were openly calling for genocide against White South Africans on the radio. “We give them 24 hours in South Africa to get out of town by sundown. I say, if they don’t get out of town, we kill the men, we kill the women, we kill the children, we kill the babies, we kill the blind, we kill the cripple,” former NBPP National Chairman Khalid Muhammad, who led the group until his death in 2001, said in a speech that was re-broadcasted by the organization on its radio program as late as August of last year. “I say God d[***]it we kill them all…. If they are white, kill ’em all.”

Muhammad, who worked for Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam prior to assuming power at the NBPP, also explained why he thought White woman and children needed to be murdered, too.

Why kill the women? Why kill the babies? They are just innocent blue-eyed babies? Because God d[***]it they are going to grow up one day to rule your babies. Kill them now,” he fumed. “Why kill the women in South Africa? I say kill the women because the women are the military manufacturing center, and every nine months they lay down on their backs and reinforcement rolls out from between their legs. So shut down the military manufacturing center by killing the White woman.”

Of course, even before the NBPP arrived in Southern Africa, opponents of the visit were trying desperately to halt it. A petition to deny visas to the delegates was signed by hundreds of South Africans.

Jan van Riebeeck arrives in Table Bay in April...

Jan van Riebeeck arrives in Table Bay [April, 1652]

 The petition cited NBPP statements about the true purpose of its visit: “To ignite the continent in self-determination and drive out blood sucking colonizers robbing our motherland.” Other critics pointed to NBPP claims that the mission was to bring the late chairman’s vision — genocide of all Whites, many of whose descendants arrived there hundreds of years ago — to fruition.

Friends for Humanity, a U.S.-based non-profit human rights group dedicated to raising awareness about the genocidal preparations in South Africa, said it “strongly objects” to the “revolutionary tour” by NBPP members. “Their deliberate hate speech and incitement to murder towards the already-marginalized European minority in South Africa should not be tolerated,” co-founder Sonia Hruska, a former consultant for the Mandela administration, told The New American on behalf of the group.

The European minority in South Africa is already facing level 6 out of 8 on the genocide scale [developed by Genocide Watch] and is also subjected to the ANC regime’s second transition, which is defined as a radical call to finalize ‘economic freedom.’ ”

Hruska pointed to the vicious ANC-Communist Party government-mandated discrimination faced by the European-minority in business, trade, employment, education, and more.

“Their defense mechanisms have been removed through disarmament and the removal of the effective policing structures that protected them, which places them in grave danger of being tortured and attacked,” she added, saying that especially troubling is the NBPP’s declared goal of exterminating whites. “This incitement to genocide cannot be tolerated and we wish to call on readers to take action to boycott and condemn this visit.

English: Boer guerrillas during the Second Boe...

Boer guerrillas during the Second Boer War 1899-1902

Thousands of South African families, Hruska continued, “are already mourning the brutal torture, rape and murder of family members as per the New Black Panther vision.”

She also pointed out that NBPP members in South Africa are calling for the use of brutal tactics to bring about Khalid Muhammad’s vision of genocide including barbaric, unimaginable torture.

It is unthinkable that people want to practice such inhumane torture methods, but unfortunately it is already in use and many European-minority victims and their families can attest to that,Hruska explained, referring to the barbaric terrorism being perpetrated against White South Africans. “We have a collective responsibility to eradicate such behavior, starting by strongly objecting to such incitement of genocide and by refusing to accept this in any form.”

International Afrikaner Society President Hannes Louw echoed those remarks in a statement to The New American.

Today Afrikaners are not only being tortured, raped and brutally murdered but they also victims of a well-coordinated set of actions aimed at the destruction of the essential foundations of Afrikaner life in South Africa,” Louw said. “The objectives of this Afrikanercide are the disintegration of political and social institutions, of culture, of language, of economic existence, the destruction of the personal security, liberty, dignity, and ultimately extermination of Afrikaner people in South Africa.”

Louw said the society has taken note that the racist NBPP’s goal is to fulfill the legacy of its former chairman — the total extermination of all Whites in Southern Africa, as he himself declared. Given the history of the political groups in South Africa and Zimbabwe that organized this excursion, Louw wondered if the visit might be related to the ongoing targeted extermination of innocent and predominantly White Christian Afrikaners. Based on the NBPP’s own statements, most analysts assume that it is.

Edmund Burke’s observation that all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing is still very relevant today,” the International Afrikaner Society chief said. “We call on all Americans and Afrikaners alike, familiarize yourselves with the situation in South Africa and take action to stop the evil that is currently taking place in what was once the light of Africa.”

Of course, South Africans are not the only ones dealing with NBPP problems. After the shooting of Trayvon Martin in Florida, for example, the group threatened to start a race war and murder White Americans simply because of the color of their skin.

Before that, the group’s members were caught on video violating federal law by standing outside of polling places with weapons and intimidating voters — a crime that drew outrage from across the political spectrum when (Black) Attorney General Eric Holder’s Justice Department refused to prosecute it.

The NBPP is a recognized hate group that is explicitly anti-Semitic and anti-white,” explained the federal U.S. Commission on Civil Rights in a 2010 report entitled Race Neutral Enforcement of the Law? DOJ and the New Black Panther Party Litigation.

Party members often appear in public wearing paramilitary uniforms and carrying weapons. According to Party rules, all panthers must learn to operate and service weapons correctly. In addition, officials are given military titles and the Party advocates armed struggle and violence against its enemies.”

As Zimbabwe continues its brutal descent into ruin, it appears that Mugabe, the NBPP, and powerful elements of the South African ruling establishment hope to see the same phenomenon in South Africa. The ANC-Communist Party regime has become famous for murdering its black opponents in the most barbaric ways imaginable.

Meanwhile, many thousands of European-descent Africans (Whites) — especially farmers, who are being targeted with increasing ferocity and regularity — have already been massacred since 1994. If the NBPP and its racist allies get their way, the rest will soon follow.  >Source

Alex Newman, a foreign correspondent for The New American, is currently based in Europe. He can be reached at: anewman@thenewamerican.com

For our South African readers, check out:

http://ozziesaffa.blogspot.co.nz/

http://www.censorbugbear.org/

Also Read:

South Africa – Genocidal Slaughterhouse

South African Child Sex Slaves

“Kill the Boer, Kill the Farmer”

*******************************

White South Africans DENIED Jobs

South African Killing Fields

The REAL South Africa

**********************

Blacks LESS Intelligent?

Black IQ Differences

Related articles

South Africa – Genocidal Slaughterhouse

Yasir Habib Khan

SOUTH AFRICA is fast-becoming a living slaughter house (butchery) for White People, as around 75,000 White-descent people mostly in urban areas — have been MURDERED since 1994, a period when apartheid breathed last and democracy dawned in South Africa.

[Ex-South African (now Australia) reports on this atrocious story.]

According to statistics, the White population which stands at approximately 4.6 million (9% minority race) is suffering the worst White genocide in comparison to other parts of the world.

There are 40,000 mostly White commercial farmers in South Africa. Since 1994, over 4,000 farmers and family members have been murdered in thousands of farm attacks, with many being brutally tortured and/or raped. Some victims have been burned with smoothing irons or had boiling water poured down their throats.

[ONE of thousands of farm murders: South African Killing Fields]

Compare that to the 7,518 Black people that were murdered by the Apartheid government, which comes to a percentage of 0.02% of the Black population. The murder ratio of White people is reaching at an alarming stage

So much so, White bloodshed runs amok in government protection. The ANC (African National Congress) government has promoted hate speech that constitutes “incitement to genocide.”

The Ex-President of the ANC Youth League, Julius Malema, revived the “Kill the Boer (white), Kill the Farmer” hate-song at ANC rallies, until it was declared to be hate speech by a South African judge, and Malema was enjoined from singing it.

http://www.dailystormer.com/south-african-politician-promises-not-to-genocide-whites/


Convicted TERRORIST, Nelson Mandela

For other reasons, Malema was later removed as ANCYL President. His followers continue to sing the hate song, and the Deputy President of the ANCYL has called for “war,” against “White settlers.”

CAPE TOWN/SOUTH AFRICA, 10JUN2009 -Jacob Zuma,...

Jacob Zuma, President of South Africa at the Opening Plenary on Africa and the New Global Economy at the World Economic Forum on Africa 2009

After the judge’s injunction to halt singing of the hate song, even the President of South Africa, ANC leader Jacob Zuma, himself, began to sing the “Shoot the Boer” song.

Since Zuma began to sing the hate song on 12 January 2012, murders of White farmers increased every month through April 2012, the last month for which there are confirmed figures.

There is thus strong circumstantial evidence of government support for the campaign of forced displacement and atrocities against White farmers and their families.

Tony Grieg, chairman of Genocide Watch, told The South Africa News “It is true that White people still riding high. They run the economy. They have a disproportionate amount of influence in politics and the media. They still have the best houses and most of the best jobs. All of this is true but it is not the only picture.

Working-class White people, most of them Afrikaans-speakers, are going through an intense crisis. But people will not read about it in the newspapers, nor see it reported on television because their plight seems to be something arising out of South Africa’s bad old past – a past which everyone, Black and White, would like to forget.

According to one leading political activist, Mandla Nyaqela, this is the after-effect (revenge?) of the huge degree of “selfishness and brutality” which was shown towards the Black population under apartheid. “It is having its effect on Whites today, even though they still own a share of South Africa’s wealth which is entirely disproportionate,” he said.

Ernst Roets, a leading Afrikaans campaigner from the AfriForum organisation, visited a White squatter camp outside the country’s capital, Pretoria.

It has been set up on the property of a sympathetic White farmer and is called, optimistically, Sonskyn Hoekie – Sunshine Corner. There are broken-down cars and bits of discarded furniture everywhere. Beyond the wooden shacks lie ditches and pools of dirty, stagnant water where mosquitoes breed. Two (2) basic toilets serve the whole camp.

[Editor's Note:  Considering our own OVER-generous welfare states in North America and Europe, many readers may be shocked to learn that South Africa DENIES welfare benefits to White citizens of that country. But it gets worse. As a result of South Africa's legally-approved "affirmative action" laws, WHITE South Africans -- despite their 9% racial-minority status -- are the very people being discriminated against when they seek employment.

Sonia Hruska (a former Mandela supporter) says: "As a business owner, I can get 25 years in jail time if I employ a White person, for instance. It is totally ridiculous; you cannot have imagined that affirmative-action could have gone so far”

So there you have it ... White citizens -- whose own ancestors designed, built, and then successfully governed a modern 1st world nation up to 1994 when the Blacks were handed a prosperous and well-run nation -- are now denied the means to support themselves through race-discriminating laws, followed by official refusal of government welfare benefits to help house and feed their now destitute families.

But you won't read of their plight in Western newspapers.

 However -- and I've used this comparison before because it's so apt -- you'll more likely read about a heavily-armed Israeli soldier stubbing his toe while chasing down some rock-throwing, 12 year old Palestinian kid before you read any news that paints the Black-run South African gov't in a bad light.

For comparison, read about this news story of a Black Haitian immigrant/refugee? in the United States who has no job, yet possesses 3 EBT (welfare card$), drives a 2006 Cadillac car for which she was arrested for drunk driving, and accuses American cops as "racists".  An editorial opinion piece of this story HERE. ]

According to Roets there are 80 White squatter-camps – many of them bigger than this – just in the Pretoria area alone. Across South Africa as a whole, he believes there could be as many as 400,000 poor Whites living in conditions like these.

Sonskyn Hoekie has no water and no electricity. The inhabitants live on two hand-out meals of maize porridge a day, which is provided by local volunteers. There is no social security for them, no lifeline – any more than there was for non-whites when apartheid ruled.

Ernst Roets’s organisation has published the names of more than 2,000 people who have died over the last two decades. The government has so far been unwilling to make solving and preventing these murders … a priority.

I went to a little town called Geluik – happiness.  A few weeks ago gunmen burst into the farm shop there and opened fire, killing one farmer outright and wounding one of his sons and a shop worker.

They stole next to nothing. It seemed to be a deliberate, targeted killing. Soon afterwards … the son also died of his wounds.

Belinda van Nord, the daughter and sister of the men who died, told me how dangerous the lives of White people in the countryside have become. The police, she said, had seemed to show little interest in this case.

[Norwegian foreign student almost stabbed to death ... story HERE.]

In the little graveyard where her father and brother are now buried there are two other graves of farmers recently murdered.

The wonderful landscape which surrounds it has become a killing ground. There used to be 60,000 White farmers in South Africa.  In only 20 years that number has been halved.   >Source

For updated news on South Africa:  http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.ca/

Also Read:

White South Africans DENIED Jobs

White GENOCIDE in South Africa

S.A. Child Sex Slaves

*****************

Canada Accepts WHITE South African Refugee

South African Black EMPOWERMENT

Create an email alert for elliot lake blogurl:

Add a blog search gadget for elliot lake blogurl:

Why We Deny Reality

From DailyKenn.com

I recall the first time I viewed VDare.com.

It was years ago when the site was still in its old cumbersome and difficult to read format. My mind was awash with guilt and foreboding as I realized, to my shock and horror, that I had landed on one of those racist, white supremacist websites. I shirked away in sullen guilt, overwhelmed with shame that I had allowed myself to cast a glimpse at such disgusting content, even though I hadn’t actually read it.

Later, I learned my assessment of VDare.com was wrong. That false impression was subtly implanted in my mind by external sources, critics whose agendas were contrary to those of American patriots.

Fortunately, my curiosity drove me to investigate. I discovered that the web site’s publisher, Peter Brimelow, was a highly respected and well-known investment guru. He was hardly one of those hooded hillbilly caricatures concocted by the left. Furthermore, Brimelow is not even from the South. He is of British birth.

My second look at VDare.com included a few moments of actually reading the content. Still a bit of flush tinged my face from residual brainwashing encounters that flood the media, I tepidly proceeded only to learn that VDare.com had been grossly misrepresented. It’s content had little to do with race, but focused instead, on immigration. Racial aspects were, of course, included.

What I previously presumed to be brain poison turned out to be the cure for latent traces of Marxism that tainted my otherwise libertarian-conservative brain. A lust for reality and quest for truth compelled me to continue to visit the site almost daily.

In time I discovered other web sites, such as Amren.com and the coarser, but honest (Stuff Black People Don’t Like)  SBPDL.com, and the more docile but ever-so-sexy AngryWhiteDude.com. No longer restrained by chains of guilt, I was free to explore in search of simple truth.

A question arises:

Where does the guilt sensation come from when we encounter bits of reality that conflict with the prevailing cultural Marxist agenda? Who laid the mental track that our minds are to run on? Why are we awash with guilt when we allow ourselves to consider reality regarding racial and other matters? Why did our great-great-grandparents thinks so differently? Are we truly enlightened? Or has our thinking been dulled and darkened?

Our environment, particularly entertainment television and cable news, are an ongoing sensitivity class that instructs us what to think and what thoughts are taboo. When public figures defy those taboos (think Michael Richards and Don Imus), they are presented to us as demonic examples; evidence that abject evil still exists in this world in the form of racism (always White racism!) Their sins are greatly exaggerated while more serious racism — such as the epidemic of black-on-white violent crime — is ignored. In time our minds are molded so efficiently that we think their thoughts are our thoughts and, eventually, they actually become our thoughts.

We become so sensitized that we shirk in horror at the slightest suggestion of racism, even where it does not exist. Liberals use this to their advantage. The so-called “race card” is effectively used as a noose that drags us about at will.

We live in perennial fear of being labeled a racist.

Our fear is then channeled by projecting it back on the source by denial. Our denial is often expressed as sarcasm and ridicule (and occasionally anger).

Nonetheless, reality remains.   >Source

Also Read:

Mass Mind-Control Through Media (MSM)

Hierarchy of Multi-culturalism 

************************

“Useful Idiots”

WAKE UP! Canada

White People Are Hypocrites

*************************

“Racism” is NOT Sinful

The Right To Discriminate

Muhammad Ali Spoke The Truth

The Betrayal of Canada

Ricardo Duchesne,
Professor of Sociology, UNB
Author of “The Uniqueness of Western Civilization

English: Flag of Canada over country contour F...

From Immigration Watch Canada

Last year, Maclean’s (Magazine July 9) had a front cover story “How Canadian Are You?” — bumptiously announcing that Canadians have earned the right to brag as a people with a great culture.

It offered an endearing “Canada Day Special” quiz for readers to determine how Canadian they were.

How much do you weigh? How many servings of veggies do you eat a day? How many times a week do you have sex? Should the NHL ban fighting? How many partial curl-ups do you do in one minute? If you scored between 20 and 25, you earned “bragging rights,” you are “a quintessential Canadian.” But if you scored between 5 and 9, you are lacking in “Canadian pride,” you are not in the right country.

This is what contemporary Canadian identity has become after five decades of mass immigration combined with endless pageants to multiculturalism. The idea that Canada has no other identity (other) than ethnic diversity has been encrypted into our brains starting with Pierre Trudeau’s announcement in Parliament in 1971:

English: Pierre Trudeau speaking at a fundrais...

Pierre Trudeau in Montréal, Québec.

“We believe that cultural pluralism is the very essence of Canadian identity. Every ethnic group has the right to preserve and develop its own culture and values within the Canadian context. To say we have two official languages is not to say we have two official cultures, and no particular culture is more ‘official’ than another.”

According to Trudeau, every ethnic identity in the world is, and can become equally “Canadian”.

The British and the French are no more important to the making of Canada’s identity than the Chinese, Muslim, Mali, or Latino “Canadian”. “Racism and bigotry” were a “large part” of Canada’s “official” history and tradition as a European nation. This once-official view will no longer be tolerated.

The “White Canada” policy laid down in the Immigration Act of 1910, and extended in the Immigration Act of 1952 … ended in the Immigration Regulations of 1967, when a non-racial set of admission criteria was adopted.

According to those Regulations, the Act of 1952 was unpardonable. Today, few care to consider that the justification behind the “White Canada” immigration policy was the preservation and cementation of the primary role of Canada’s founding peoples of European origin. The idea that other peoples (who had taken no part in the settlement efforts and in the centuries-long creation of the institutions and infrastructure of Canada) might simply arrive in mass numbers to claim Canada as equally their own was anathema to Canadians before the establishment of multiculturalism.

The new 1967 immigration regulations emphasizing skill and education rather than ethnic origins were not brought on by popular demand, or even parliamentary debate and initiative, but by senior Ministers and Cabinet officials who “did not trust the average Canadian to respond in a positive way on this issue” (Hawkins, p. 63).

Gallup polls in the 1960s showed that only about one-third of Canadians thought that Canada should bring new immigrants, and over 60% thought that the fairly low levels of Asian immigration (at the time) were already too high.

In complete disregard to Canadian popular wishes, the borders of Canada were set wide open in the 1980s to immigrants from Asia, Africa, the Caribbean, Central and South America and the Middle East, under the directives of the major (political) parties, the media, tenured academic radicals, and business elites.

The number of immigrants coming each year into Canada since the early 1990s has been staggering, roughly 225, 000 and 260,000 immigrants per year, mostly from NON-European nations (85%+- NON-whites).

From 1981 to 2001, (Canada’s) visible-minorities increased more than threefold (almost 400%) from 1.1 million people, or nearly 5% of the population, to 4.0 million people, or 13% of the population.

By 2011 the foreign-born population of Canada stood at 20.6 per cent. Settling mostly in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver, immigrants have radically transformed the cultural composition and socio-ethnic dynamics of Canada’s major cities.

English: Toronto: Skyline, left side the Canad...

TORONTO – Canada’s Largest City

By 2017, it is expected that 50% of Toronto’s population will be immigrants, up from 44% in 2001.

In Vancouver, the proportion is projected to be 44%.

Other cities such as Calgary, Edmonton, Winnipeg, Saskatoon, Regina and Ottawa are also seeing their traditional European milieu changed by an ever rising tide of visible majorities.


Oh, Canada – Wake Up!

Today, the mainstream media (MSM), and the academic world take great pleasure in labelling our immigration policy prior to 1967 — as “racist and exclusionary”. But this is a cultural Marxist assessment of Canadian perceptions, their culture and ethnicity.

Canadians then, were part of a Western world committed and strongly attached to the idea that every individual citizen of Canada should be treated equally under the law without discrimination based on race, national origin, or religion. They were not “racist”, but merely ethnocentric — that is — a people with a natural and normal preference for their own ethnic traditions.

Ethnic groups throughout the world exhibit a preference for their own culture, and a disposition to judge other cultures by the standards of their own religion and customs. But today in the Western world, ethnocentrism is looked down upon as an attitude that contravenes the “universal brotherhood of humanity” to be manifested in Western multiethnic and multicultural societies.

As diverse ethnic groups come into contact with one another within Western countries, our liberal elites bow to the importance of “understanding” other cultures and overcoming one’s ethnic prejudices. Europeans still exhibiting strong attachments (to their age-old cultures) are said to be bogged down by “irrational fears”.

But recent scientific research shows otherwise: ethnocentrism is a healthy and practical evaluation of one’s ethnic identity and interests consistent with evolutionary theory and cultural sophistication. This is the argument ethnocentric individuals can opportunely take from a scientific paper published in Psychological and Cognitive Sciences (January 2011), with the fitting title: “Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism”. Written by a research team at the University of Amsterdam, directed by Dr. Carsten de Dreu, this article shows that oxytocin is a human molecule associated with in-group favoritism and out-group derogation.

Through a series of experiments in which participants were administered doses of oxytocin, the researchers learned that “a key mechanism facilitating in-group cooperation is ethnocentrism, the tendency to view one’s group as centrally important and as superior to other groups” at the expense of an out-group.

How, then, did European Canadians come to accept the idea that it is “racist” and “xenophobic” to exhibit preference for one’s own ethnicity and heritage, while believing, at the same time that every NON-European ethnic group has a right to preserve its own culture inside Canada?

How did Canadians come to believe that their identity can be proudly captured in answers to such banal Macleans (Magazine) questions as “How many rooms does your house have per person?” There is no space here to address these questions. Suffice it to respond — to those who claim that multiculturalism was in origins and essence a “quintessentially Canadian” idea and policy — that the relentless promotion of diversity and mass immigration, despite some variations, has been a Western-wide phenomenon since the 1960s.

The American President Lyndon B Johnson signed the Immigration Act of 1965, which led to a tremendous surge in immigration from Mexico and Asia in the decades that followed. Eight years later the “White Australia Policy” came to an end, resulting in a massive influx of ethnocentric Asians.

Western European nations have also seen their cultures awash in immigration and diversity. The British Nationality Act of 1948 affirmed the right of Commonwealth citizens (including those of newly independent Commonwealth countries like India) to settle in the United Kingdom.

Commonwealth immigration rose from 3,000 per year in 1953 to 46,800 in 1956 and 136,400 in 1961 Some restrictions were introduced in the 60s and 70s including the British Nationality Act, which required migrants to have a “substantial connection with the United Kingdom” by birth or ancestry to a UK national.

Nevertheless, in the 1970s, averages of 72,000 immigrants were settling in the UK every year from the Commonwealth; and in the 1980s and early 1990s around 54,000 per year, rising to around 97,000 by 1999. About half the population increase in Britain between the 1991 and 2001 censuses was due to foreign-born immigration.

By 2012, White British had dropped from 87.5% of the population in 2001 to 80.5%.

White Britons in London – in 2012 – accounted for less than half (44.9%) of its population, and more than one in three London residents is foreign-born. As the country was flooded with immigrants, diversity was strenuously enforced through incessant media campaigns including the transformation of the entire curriculum from pre-kinder onwards away from any historic pride in the British heritage. Similar changes have been brought by liberal elites in France, Spain, Italy, Sweden, Denmark, and increasingly as well in Norway, Switzerland, and Ireland.

[See: Perils of Racial Diversity]

Some will argue that these changes were “sensible” components of worldwide trends toward “globalization”, free trade and free capital mobility. The fact is that if economic globalization was naturally accompanied by the “free” mobility of people, then we should have also seen major demographic-ethnic changes in Asia, and the world generally.

Asia’s now advanced economies have seen international trade, investment and finance represent ever growing portions in their economies, but in total contrast to the countries of North America and Europe, Asia has not seen migrants grow as a share of its population. In fact, immigrants have accounted for a mere 1.4-1.6% of Asia’s population over the past 20 years. Moreover, contrary to the argument that immigration has been a necessity brought on by low fertility rates and ageing of the populations of the West, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and other Asian countries have fertility rates below replacement, even lower than Canada’s and some of Europe’s countries: at 1.4, 1.2, 1.2, and 1.1 respectively. And the proportions of their populations above the age of 65 are very high and rising.

The question thus stands: Why are European-created nations the only ones experiencing mass immigration and multiculturalism? Some may point to the youth-centered counterculture emerging in the 1960s questioning the values of anyone over thirty — that is to say — the values of the silent majority of Canadians who felt comfortable with the Immigration Act of 1952.

Writers, actors, and producers across the West, whether in fiction, theatre, or film, broke old taboos against sexual explicitness, graphic violence, homosexuality, and divorce. The civil rights movement in the United States, exotic guerilla movements in the Third World, Aboriginal Rights, Quebec nationalism, opposition to the war in Vietnam, and the complete takeover of Canada’s universities by cultural Marxists, were components of the 1960s political atmosphere.

However, if I had to choose one reason why Western countries decided to negate their European heritage and ethnicity, I would say it was the twin ideologies of universalism and egalitarianism. By universal egalitarianism, I mean the idea that humans are essentially the same everywhere, and that our ethnicities and cultural ancestries are either superficial, or easy to transform through proper instruction in the acquisition of modern “universal values” such as civic equality, tolerance, affluent civility, and democratic participation.

The notion that the liberal elites in the West represented the highest ideals of humanity had become conventional thinking in the 60s. The West was ahead of other cultures in the institutionalization of these universal values; it was the moral obligation of Western elites to showcase these values to the world. Humanity could be united under these values with different ethnic groups co-existing and interbreeding in the same lands in an atmosphere of liberal affluence.

These ideas preceded the 1960s with roots going back to the Enlightenment and perhaps even Christianity. The senior government officials who introduced non-racial immigration rules in Canada in the 1960s were influenced by the ideas which led to the creation of the United Nations and a multiracial Commonwealth.

The UN Declaration of Universal Human Rights in 1948, the UNESCO statements on race (1950, 1951, 1964, 1967), with their language about a common humanity, which arose directly from the experience of Nazism, made some politicians uncomfortable with a Canada acting on the world stage as a democratic and liberal nation while excluding non-Whites from its borders. The Immigration Act of 1952 seemed old, exclusionary, and illiberal.

This love for a future non-ethnocentric humanity, projected onto a benign future that was not real, entailed a growing dislike and intolerance for the actual Canadian population of European ethnic origin. In 1971, this European population constituted about 96% of Canada’s demography. This existing European population still sympathized with Mackenzie King’s 1947 announcement in the House:

“The people of Canada do not wish, as a result of mass immigration, to make a fundamental alteration in the character of our population. Large-scale immigration from the Orient would change the fundamental composition of the Canadian population.”

But liberal elites, as the radical 1960s spread, were determined to re-engineer the souls of average Canadians. There was no national debate on multiculturalism and mass immigration. Canadian immigration policy proceeded, for the most part, by way of non-transparent regulations, executive directives, and administrative discretion … not by legislative action.

Immediately after Trudeau’s 1971 announcement, numerous programs were implemented:  multicultural grants, ethnic development programs, funds for the writing of the NON-European ethnic histories, support for Canadian ethnic studies “to set the record straight” by reflecting Canada’s diverse cultural traditions and the contributions of non-British and non-French to Canada’s identity and history. All ethnic groups were to be seen as equal to the making of Canada. Never mind the actual historical and political fact of the two founding peoples of Canadian Confederation!!!

With grants freely available, there was, in the words of one observer, an “explosion of academic research into ethnicity.” Between 1971 and 1982, 88 scholarly works on cultural minorities were published in Canada, as well as numerous collections of papers ; many symposiums on Canadian ethnic groups and relations were held. A new discipline, “Canadian Ethnic Studies,” was born, soon to proliferate throughout the halls of academe. This was just the beginning of a “bonanza of remarkable proportions” in the promotion of multiculturalism through every level of society.

In June 1984, the Conservative Leader Brian Mulroney told a cheering crowd that his party now stood for multiculturalism and would not allow itself to be called “the Party of White Anglo-Saxon Protestants”. Multicultural diversity — he said — was an absolutely obligatory part of Canada’s national identity and to reject it … was to reject Canada.

He then outlined future changes his party intended to implement in the hiring policies of the federal government, services in non-official languages, more funds for the preservation and advancement of NON-European cultures and greater efforts to “stamp out racism wherever it rears its ugly head.”

This stamping out was directed singularly against the British people and their legacy in Canada. The French in Quebec had successfully managed to portray themselves — from the 1960s onwards — as an oppressed minority within Canada with its own legitimate identity seeking a new constitutional deal framed against Anglo Canada. It was the British, and then the Europeans who had assimilated to English Canada, who were being asked to relinquish any sense of culture deeply grounded in ethnic bonds, ancestry, and homeland.

The ethnicity of Quebecers, and of Native peoples, could be viewed in primordialist terms as deeply rooted in their lands, communities, histories, and customary identities. But normal British and English Europeans were prohibited from binding themselves to a geographical and cultural “homeland”.

Their ethnicity was to be de-linked from a homeland called “Canada”. There was no such a thing as a Canadian identity that could be linked primordially to the British or the English-Europeans. The European-Canadian identity was to be witnessed only in multicultural tolerance, pluralist values, democracy, and diversity. But since these values were “universal” — for “humanity” – they would not be seen as uniquely British or European.

To the contrary, these values would be used against any British sense of identity for the sake of protecting and promoting the ethnic pride of NON-Europeans.

Asians, Blacks, and Latinos had the right to preserve their own ethnic roots and culture in a “multicultural” Canada. They would have hyphenated identities such as “I am really Chinese, but I live in mosaic Canada,” or “I have ethnic Chinese roots, but I identify with Canadian diversity and democracy.”

Since the British were allegedly the agents of “racist” and exclusionary immigration practices, and whereas the immigrants (including the millions who were not yet in Canada) were the “victims” of such practices … multiculturalism, thus worked necessarily as a force against British identity, and as a force for non-European identities.

To this day — every day – media pundits and self-righteous academics insist that “racism” is experienced by immigrants of visible status, and that a “major goal of multiculturalism must be to eliminate racism.”

Forget that visible immigrants come from illiberal, racially ranked, and backward cultures, and that individual rights and non-racial discrimination policies were unique legacies of the British, and that visible immigrants in Canada are far more uncomfortable with other visible groups, than are European Canadians.

The point is … that “racism” per se, has been inexorably tied to the ethnocentrism of British/European Canada, and so the elimination of “racism” requires the eradication of British and European identity. Some iconic symbols and practices such as the maple leaf, hockey players, and calendar photographs of Lake Louise may be allowed. The Maclean’s ‘Canadian’ “with bragging rights” should ask for no more.

Perhaps on Canada Day, rather than celebrating the dispossession of European Canadians and their transformation into “quintessentially” deracinated characters, we should critically examine the unfounded notion that European ethnocentrism, and only European ethnocentrism, amounts to “ethnic cleansing”, “fanaticism,” and “violence” against outsiders (Kelley and Trebilock, p. 471).

Japan, Korea, and many other countries, have a very high degree of ethnic homogeneity, as do some Nordic European countries (Finland, Norway, and also Switzerland), but none of them are engaged in wars of exclusion and violence against other ethnic groups.

Ending mass immigration and multiculturalism in the West is not an act of exclusion and racism. It is the other way around : these policies have amounted to acts of exclusion and dispossession against the historic British and European peoples of Canada. Our cooperative nature is intrinsically connected to our in-group nature. Ethnocentrism means loyalty and commitment for one’s group; it does not entail “hatred” and “rancour” against other groups. The scientists Carsten de Dreu et al. observe 2011), in fact, that the tendency for in-group members is to favour their own rather than to hate outsiders:

“[T]here is good reason to believe that the in-group prejudice effect is far more basic to human life than is the out-group hate prejudice effect, and research on human ethnocentrism supported this positive-negative asymmetry of social discrimination. “

The multiculturalists are the ones who have infused politics with an intolerant ideology in which anyone proud of his European heritage, and refusing to join the multiculti choruses … is despised as a “xenophobic” outsider. The irony of creating a “universal humanity” is that it has required the dehumanization of the British people, or any other particular European group, wishing to retain its identity.

Multiculturalists advocate in-group favoritism for immigrants and cultural Marxists, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, out-group hate for those Canadians who love their European heritage.

They have demonized the European founding peoples of Canada as an out-group, an enemy of “humanity”, to be eradicated for the sake of NON-European “diversity”, and the creation of a new species inside Canada and the West.

Their position runs counter to the natural, healthy and rational ethnocentric prejudices of humans. It also runs counter to the actual ethnic diversity of the peoples of the earth. Why would the Japanese, Koreans, and Pakistanis want their countries to look like “diverse” Toronto?

Let us defend European ethnocentrism in the name of human nature and the true diversity of the peoples of the planet.  >Immigration Watch Canada

(For added emphasis,  underlined Bolded words and links are by ELN Editor)

Also Read:

“Useful Idiots”

How To Destroy a Nation

Importing BLACK Violence

Importing Jamaican “Culture”

Canada’s BLACK Population

*************************

Police Surrender To “Diversity”

Canadians Betrayed By Politicians

White People Under Relentless Attack

Teaching Moments in Black Violence

White intolerance is preferred to indifference
by DailyKenn.com

Four videos emerged this week that should shock White Americans to rid themselves of their neurotic white-guilt mindset. Sad to say, our minds are so fogged with inverse reasoning that reality is simply not within reach.

A black thug kicks in the head
of a little white boy as white
Americans indulge in guilt.

The first video was recorded at a rec center in Pittsburgh. Two Black males assaulted a slightly-built teen. The White boy was beaten to the sidewalk where one of his attackers repeatedly attempted to kick in the head of his victim [view videos at source].

The second video was recorded at a middle-class home in New Jersey. A huge Black male intruder assaulted a young White mother as her 3-year-old daughter helplessly watched the assault. The White victim was shoved down a stairwell while the Black attacker rampaged through the home. The video was captured by a nanny-cam [view video].

A White mom is beaten in her own
home by a Black intruder.

The third video was recorded in a court in Sanford, Florida where Black witness Rachel Jeantel admitted that racial slurs, such as “creepy-ass cracker” were common in the Black community. Jeantel was the star witness for the prosecution in the George Zimmerman self-defense trial.

Paula Deen weeps, but not for the little
boy whose head was kicked in or the
mom who was beaten in her own home.

The fourth video may have been the most shocking of all. It was recorded at the studios of the ‘Today’ show. TV personality Paula Deen openly wept as she apologized to the nation for using a racially-charged pejorative term to describe a Black male who pointed a gun at her head 30 years ago during a holdup at a bank where Deen was working at the time.

No tears were shed for White children who are routinely assaulted by Black thugs. No tears were shed for young White mothers who are beaten in the security and safety of their own homes. Only tears of politically-correct white guilt are offered.

Are we crazy? Indeed we are.

Viewing Whites with disdain as ‘crazy
ass crackers‘ is common in the
Black community.

Our children are literally being stomped to the ground by Black thugs, our moms are being brutally beaten in the security of their own homes, and the Black community expresses its contempt for us with a chorus of racially-charged pejoratives such as ‘cracker.’ Our response is to openly weep in remorse of our White-guilt.

It is neurotic behavior on a national scale. It is an abject denial of reality and a displacement of truth with myth that we accept without question. Our minds are so saturated with Hollywood nonsense that we have abandoned objective thinking. In fact, many Whites who read this article, do so while shirking in shame by virtue of the fact that they are exposing their thoughts to the reality of black-on-white violence.

We fail to recognize that Jim Crow was a rational response to Black crime as witnessed in the first and second videos. Racial segregation was never meant to harm Blacks. Rather, it was intended to protect Whites from vicious attacks as seen in those two videos. It was a reasonable acknowledgement of the hatred for Whites that clouds the mindset of the Black community.

The Jim Crow era was a time when Whites tolerated Blacks, but they refused tolerate black crime and violence. Such intolerance is demonized by cultural Marxism and miscast as White “racism”. In reality, however, intolerance of Black crime is preferred to indifference to Black violence raining down upon White children and moms.

The ultimate tragedy is that White Americans are so delusional that our culture has become distorted beyond recovery. The abuse of White people will only become worse.  >Source

Same Video – but the less “sanitized” version of the MSM.

Also Read:

Crime & Race

Importing Black Violence (Canada)

AUSTRALIA Meets With Black Crime

Post Navigation

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 94 other followers

%d bloggers like this: