Japan’s Own 9/11 – Fukushima

By JIM STONE

Japan's Fukushima Nuclear Plant Explosion

 

NEW ULTRA HIGH-RESOLUTION FUKUSHIMA PHOTOS

I had these (aerial photos) from the beginning, and upon reviewing them, they have such a high forensic value that I am letting them out now. These are very close to “as good as it gets“.

ARCHIVE, RE-POST, GET (THESE PHOTOS) OFF THIS SITE AND SAVED AND POSTED ELSEWHERE…. NOW!

This is because they so clearly DEBUNK the official story that they need distributed protection. For bandwidth considerations, I am posting the two most pertinent ones first. 

Fukushima from ABOVE & Fukushima from the FRONT

These are important photographs because you can sit down, analyze them and see exactly what really happened in Japan.

I did not realize how much my scaled down versions was left out, and when I looked closely at the ultra high res versions, I realized that I had made a mistake by not posting them the very first day. As it was, what I had posted to begin with was much more clear than anything else on the web.  >SOURCE

Related articles

• WSJ: “An eerie quietness” in Fukushima says top biologist – Bird population dropped twice as much as after Chernobyl – “Disturbing development” (enenews.com)
• Author, farmer expose manipulation of radiation data – “Employees wash monitoring post by high-pressure water and changed the whole soil” (enenews.com)

State Enforced Miscegenation

By Kathleen Moore

 

 

 

I am finally doing a little research on a key man behind the PanEuropa movement, one of the root causes responsible today for the advancing elimination of the nation-state in Europe (as in America) and their respective founding peoples.  Wikipedia at the outset says:

 

 

 

 

“Coudenhove-Kalergi complemented his liberal views of the political role of the Jews with distinctive advocacy of race mixing (or miscegenation). In his book Praktischer Idealismus (Practical Idealism) he wrote:

 

 

 

“The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.”

 

 

 

 “Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility by the Grace of Spirit. This happened at the moment when Europe’s feudal aristocracy became dilapidated, and thanks to Jewish emancipation. … ”

 

 

 

In fact, the Ancient Egyptians were comprised of several races, including red, white and black, and they therefore do not stand as a precedent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

What stands out for me today, in the (French President) Sakozy videos, are the following elements from that passage of Kalergi’s: “race-mixing”, “classes,” “artificial selection process”.

 

 

 

Kalergi is writing in 1925.

 

 

 

Charles Darwin published “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life” on 24 November 1859, a work of scientific literature considered to be the foundation of evolutionary biology. _

 

 

 

For the sixth edition of 1872, the title was shortened to “The Origin of Species”. Darwin’s book introduced the scientific theory that populations evolve over the course of generations through a process of “natural selection”. It presented a body of evidence that the “diversity” of life arose by common descent through a branching pattern of evolution.

 

 

 

It seems to me that what we are looking at in the views of such as Kalergi – whether he understood it or not, or perhaps was being duplicitous – is a reverse-engineering of human societies by means of “artificial selection” (the tool of livestock breeders, or breeders of poodles and lapdogs).

 

 

 

In reality, the goal or object is not a “diversity” of life “by common descent through a BRANCHING pattern of evolution”, but a REDUCTION of human racial, cultural and social “diversity” toward MASS UNIFORMITY. Thus, the unnatural goal is precisely to ELIMINATE “diversity” while disguising it as a laudable thing called “pluralism”, for example. But mass uniformity is NOT a quality of nature!

 

 

 

Neither does the socialist welfare state (advancing at the same time as this fast-tracked program of racial DIS-similarity) and which eliminates competition, qualify as a tool of social Darwinism. It is precisely anti-natural because it eliminates the very competition that in the view of evolutionists supposedly leads to “survival of the fittest” and to a natural improvement of species.

 

 

 

Kalergi’s program also presumes that Darwin has discovered a final scientific truth that is unrevisable; his kind of “artificial” tinkering thus may be fatal to other realities of nature that we may be unaware of.

 

 

 

If they keep on going, we should perhaps look like paramecia, and then like organic molecules, and then like primeval soup among the rocks again, if this artificial reductionism is a value in itself that must continue back to unknown “Origins”.

 

 

 

I think there is a hidden value here that could best be expressed as “elimi-NATION”. In other words, this road to mass uniformity falsely disguised as Darwinism is really a power grab by the self-appointed social controllers.

 

 

 

One may just as well call the specific “artificial” introduction of a new breed of bull to his cow by the farmer as “diversity”.

 

 

 

In the Sarkozy-sponsored program of forced “racial interbreeding” (métissage) to eliminate the White-race French people, it has no real meaning in and of itself except to misleadingly label a transient stage; for its non-admirable goal aims at breeding OUT both racial & cultural “diversity”. And, no doubt, diversity of views and tastes, which conceivably would result in more amenable and socially controllable populations, i.e., “lapdogs”. Or, the human term, slaves.

 

 

 

One might employ an “artificial selection process” to build a human master race. One might equally use it to build BOTH a slave race and a master race, simultaneously; for example, if one particular race has contrived to place itself behind nuclear-protected borders while simultaneously using DNA discrimination to keep its own species “pure”, while actively pushing mass-”métissage” for the rest of us.

 

 

 

If it is despicable to consciously use an “artificial selection process” to build a master race, is it less despicable to use it to build a slave race? For, to me, this is the essence of the command by socio-political race-farmer Sarkozy to the White French people to interbreed — failing which, “the State” will introduce measures “more coercive” than his public orders.

 

 

 

What would those coercive measures be? Mass-starvation and denial of jobs and aid to Whites… as in South Africa?

 

 

 

How about involuntary forced insemination? If they can do it with cows and dogs, what will stop them doing it to humans?

 

 

 

And why should we not call this program the Fourth Reich?

 

 

 

Kathleen Moore
HABEAS CORPUS CANADA
The Official Legal Challenge
To North American Union
http://www.habeascorpuscanada.com
Blog: http://habeascorpuscanadacomments.blogspot.com

 

 

 

ALSO READ:

 

 

 

FRANCE Is Falling Fast

 

 

 

Destroying FRANCE Through Hybridization

 

 

 

****************************************

 

 

 

U.S. White Minority SOON

 

 

 

The Racial Spoils System

 

 

 

Anti-White Police Hiring

 

 

 

Related articles

 

 

 

• School Forces White Kids to Sit with Minorities (mackquigley.wordpress.com)
• Muhammad Ali Speaks The Truth (1971) (elliotlakenews.wordpress.com)

 

“Racist” Pre-School Children

Image via Wikipedia

Tristin Hopper, National Post

Along with finger-painting and story time, Canadian preschools are also spilling over with ethnic tension, according to a study released by Concordia University.

“We found Asian-Canadian and French-Canadian (White) children seemed to prefer interacting with kids of the same ethnic background,” said report co-author Nadine Girouard in a Tuesday release.

At mixed-race daycares throughout Montreal, researchers took Asian-Canadian children and French Canadian (White) children, ranging in age from three to five years old, and paired them up in rooms with “attractive toys” such as a marble track, or a Sesame Street-themed playhouse.

When put in with members of the same race, children happily played together. When mixed with different races, however, the children usually opted to play alone. Preschoolers “express a preference for same-ethnic interactions,” reads the study.

The revelation is nothing new. For more than 60 years, psychologists have been finding evidence of barely-toilet-trained children exhibiting prejudicial tendencies.

In the late 1940s, American psychologists Kenneth and Mamie Clark tried to gauge the inherent prejudices of children by showing them black and white dolls and asking which was better. Whether the child was white or black, the child “indicated a clear-cut preference for white.” “It is clear that the Negro child, by the age of five is aware of the fact that to be colored in contemporary American society is a mark of inferior status,” the pair wrote.

Their research was ultimately a factor in the 1954 US Supreme Court Decision to de-segregate public schools. In subsequent American studies, researchers have found black and white children self-segregating as early as kindergarten.

[Read: Students Learn To "White Flight" ]

Prejudice in children first starts to crop up right around the age of three or four (years), says Frances Aboud, a McGill University psychology professor specializing in the development of “racism” in children. The first time children come up against different ethnicities, their initial reaction is “nobody in my family looks like that,” says Ms. Aboud. “Sometimes kids even go so far as to say that a child is intentionally trying not to look like him,” she says.

The Montreal study attributes the rift between the Asian-Canadian and French Canadian (White) children to nothing more than cultural awkwardness. Rather than being driven apart by animosity, the two groups are simply baffled by one another. Raised in a culture of social restraint, the Asian-Canadian children were more likely to try to interact non-verbally with the French-Canadians by silently “cooperating” in playing with a toy. French-Canadian children, meanwhile, would try to engage their Asian-Canadian playmates in conversation. After a few confusing minutes, the two children usually found it easier to part ways….. and play in silence.

(……and now the politically-correct salve is applied, so as not to offend anyone’s feelings…Ed.) 

However, the “beauty” of the Montreal study, says Ms. Girouard, is that the Asian-Canadians and French-Canadians ultimately learned to overcome their differences and play together. “Children found mutually satisfactory and effective means of engaging one another,” reads the study. Once-subdued Asian-Canadians began to talk louder and (White) French-Canadians responded by quieting down. “Each was able to import the culture of the other,” says Ms. Girouard. “Children, regardless of their ethnicity, want to play together and understand each other.”  -Source

ALSO READ:

“Racism”  Is Not Sinful

Race Diversity – But Why?

Is Racial Separation Immoral? 

Is Racial Diversity Good for Canada?

***********************************************

Racial Diversity – A CON Game

The Dreaded “Racist” Label

****************************************

Minority Whites Fighting Back

Students Learn To “White Flight”

Black Culture Retarding White Kids

British Schools Brainwashing Students

 

 

Related articles

• Do Preschoolers Prefer Playmates of Same Ethnicity? (sciencedaily.com)

What is Miscegenation?

mis·ceg·e·na·tion

–noun

1. …heterosexual marriage/cohabitation between different races….usually a black/white coupling in the U.S.

2. …interbreeding between members of different races.

3. …the mixing or a mixture of races by interbreeding.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Richard D. Fuerle

Erectus Walks Amongst Us
…excerpts from Chapter 29

[...]

No dog lover would want all the breeds of dogs to interbreed, so that all dogs are mongrels. No breeder of race horses would want his thoroughbreds to breed with common riding ponies. No garden lover wants all his flowers to come in only a single color or shape, or his tomatoes or apples in only a single variety, and no oenophile (wine lover) would want only a single red wine and a single white wine to choose from.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Only those driven mad by the maladaptive ideology of egalitarianism, cheer the loss of diversity that results from their demands for more of it. ⁶ To borrow from the anti-racists, one might call the end result of miscegenation, “Life without rainbows.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Egalitarians love diversity so much that they insist that everything – our corporations, restaurants, hotels, neighborhoods, schools, television, movies, and textbooks ⁷ must all be diverse – everything, that is, except people, who must miscegenate to become the same and therefore equal.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

They were overjoyed in 2003 when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled ⁸ that “diversity” (i.e., racial quotas) is so important that colleges can legally violate the Fourteenth Amendment, ⁹ but only for 25 yrs, by discriminating against Eurasians in order to achieve diversity in their student bodies. But their love of diversity is different from the love others have for it.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Egalitarians love diversity not as an end, but as a means. They do not want to preserve the diversity of the peoples of this planet; they want to destroy it. Making all human contact diverse is simply their means for destroying human diversity. Mix the races physically, and they will mix biologically on their own. ¹⁰ Diversity to destroy diversity.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The loss of biological diversity, which most of us would not wish on the living things we love and value, egalitarians wish upon man himself.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Some egalitarians openly encourage miscegenation, while others even condemn the failure to miscegenate as “racist,” ¹¹ and still others argue that everyone might as well miscegenate because everyone is already a mixture.

In the sense that the races share most alleles (as do people and chimps), everyone is a mixture but, as we shall see in the next chapter, there are major differences between (1) people within a population interbreeding and (2) people from very different populations interbreeding.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It is not necessary to involve the government in people’s intimate
decisions in order to reduce miscegenation and preserve the uniqueness of the Earth’s peoples. People themselves, given their freedom, can accomplish this. They can segregate themselves, as suggested in Chapter 31. ¹²

They can boycott movies, television, and books that show, or advocate miscegenation. And they can ostracize those who practice, encourage, or condone it. Parents can disapprove of their children dating inter-racially and withhold benefits, such as weddings, gifts, inheritances, and social support from children who defy their wishes and reject their own people as mates.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

They can cite statistics showing that they are many times as likely to get a STD (sexually transmitted disease) from a black person as from a white (Chapter 12, Note (4)) and, for females, many times as likely to be beaten, raped, and murdered. ¹³ Many things can be done but, until people come to believe that it is desirable and morally good to preserve their own genetic heritage, nothing will be done.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The race mixers love to point out that White men fear that black men will take “their” women. Of course, they fear that; ¹⁴ for a White man, it’s a significant loss in fitness. The biological purpose of a male of any species is to pass on his alleles, and the principal way he does this is by impregnating females. But he gets a big bonus if he impregnates a woman who already has more of the same alleles that he has, i.e., someone of the same race (Chapter 8, FN 4), and his fitness falls if he lets someone of another race impregnate “his” women (and similarly for women).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This biological purpose implies, of course, that he must not only compete against other men, particularly men of a different race, but win that competition. If he does not even try to win and, indeed, facilitates his own failure, then his unique collection of alleles, including the alleles that made him a biological loser, are out of the game. ¹⁵

[...]

Another way of looking at miscegenation is from the viewpoint of eugenics. If blacks and whites engage in miscegenation, the mulatto progeny will have characteristics of both races. ¹⁸ Will the two races regard the mullatos as “improved” children? Although there are no polls on this question, other evidence suggests that more blacks would see it as an improvement than whites. ¹⁹ As we have seen, blacks are genetically primitive humans, who have evolved a lesser distance away from our ape LCA. They have alleles that are many millions of years old – chimpanzees and gorillas have them, but Eurasians do not (Chapter 16, FN 17). Admitting those and other primitive alleles into the White genome would undo hundreds of thousands, if not millions of years of White evolution. ²⁰ Both blacks and Whites regard the primitive features of blacks as undesirable (p. 96). Both White and black children prefer playing with White dolls. ²¹ And the push behind integration has been blacks wanting to be around Whites… not Whites wanting to be around blacks.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Mulattos resent the fact that they can never be “White,” and must accept a lower status as a “black.” They become hostile towards Whites, who are the higher status group, even though they would have an even lower status if they were not partly White. Thus, Whites who have mulatto children create enemies of Whites, including themselves, another reason for Whites to oppose miscegenation. ²²

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[From the 7 Billion worldwide population, what percentage (%) are WHITE PEOPLE ?   ANSWER]

Most mixed race breeding occurs at the margins, where a White woman is undesirable to White men (overweight, ugly, old, addicted to drugs, mentally ill, low IQ, etc.) or has been rejected by a White man, resulting in a deep hatred of all White men…. or the black man may be rich and/or famous (e.g., Tiger Woods, O.J. Simpson), though there are some cases where the explanation is not readily apparent (e.g., blond German model Heidi Klum). >…continued HERE.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ALSO READ:

Diversity – A Con Game

Black/White IQ Differences

To Recognize Racial Differences

JAPAN Prefers Racial Homogeneity

JAPAN Simply Rejects Mass Immigration

Related articles

• Is Multi-Culti A CULT? (elliotlakenews.wordpress.com)
• WHEN THERE’S NOT ENOUGH MISCEGENATION: Skulls of early humans carry telltale signs of inbreeding, s… (pjmedia.com)
• Another miscegenation slaughter (topconservativenews.com)

ChemTrails Are Poison Trails

[...]

For more than a decade, first the United States and then Canada’s citizens have been subjected to a 24/7/365 day aerosol assault over our heads made of a toxic brew of poisonous heavy metals, chemicals, and other dangerous ingredients.

NONE of this was reported by any mainstream media. The US Department of Defense [DOD] and military have been systematically blanketing all our skies with what are known as Chemtrails (also known as Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering). (2) These differ vastly from the usual plane contrails that evaporate rather quickly in the sky.  Chemtrails do not dissipate. Rather, planes (fitted with special nozzles) release aerosols “lines” in the sky that do not evaporate.

Multiple planes are deployed, flying parallel (or often “checkerboard” patterns) overhead; and soon the sky is blanketed with many grayish-white lines [miles and miles long, although this is changing]. At first, these lines are thin; but soon they expand and, in a short time, merge together. Our once-blue sky has vanished and has been replaced by a grayish-white toxic haze that blots out and greatly diminishes our usual sunshine.

Military and commercial planes are involved in more than 60 secret operations. Last year, when I flew across the country, I saw a United Airlines jet (flying below us at about 37,000 feet) spraying a black aerosol that went for miles and miles across the sky. This clandestine program now includes aerosol-spraying planes in North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand [all NATO countries].

Hundreds (if not thousands) of people have called and written their public officials to get answers. Replies from US and Canadian officials are not forthcoming; or, if they do reply, queries are dismissed. This remains an ongoing, deliberate cover-up. No one is held accountable, while we continued to be poisoned daily. This is not the first time, however, that citizens are being used as experimental laboratory test subjects. The US government and its military have a very long and sordid history of using us, without informed consent, in this illegal manner. As Carole Pellatt notes:

‘The U.S. military has been spraying chemical and biological weapons in open air testing over civilian populations since the 1940’s. They are called “vulnerability tests”. This is not a controversial statement. The military has admitted to this practice on many occasions and there’s plenty of documentation from the government to corroborate it. There is also documentation of intentional, experimental releases of radiation on civilian populations. Unfortunately, this information tends to surface long after it could have saved lives, or eased the suffering of victims.’

[...]

Numerous tests have been done to verify that these poisons are off the scale in their toxicity. They are documented in our water, in our soil, and in our air. For more than 10 years, researcher Clifford Carnicom has been valiantly and systematically reporting on the various detrimental aspects of these aerosols –and what they are doing to our entire environment, as well as our blood.(6) Various “sky watch” groups also have been carefully documenting and diligently reporting about these daily assaults.(7)

With all these poisons surrounding our every breath, it is not surprising to see a dramatic increase in illnesses. There are numerous reports of the increase in cardiac deaths and upper respiratory illnesses (asthma, chronic bronchitis, lung cancer, and often multiple chronic illnesses). Chemtrails toxicity has already dramatically affected our deteriorating “collective health.” The significant increase in heart disease and various upper respiratory illnesses has been linked to a vast increase in “particulate matter” in our air.  -To Full Report

ALSO READ:

German TV Exposes Chemtrails

Chemtrails Are Poisoning Our Sky

Chemtrails – Spraying Our Sky

Military Cover-Up

Related articles

• Swedish official admits toxic ‘chemtrails’ are real, not a wild conspiracy theory (talesfromthelou.wordpress.com)

The De-Population Agenda

TEHRAN (Press TV) — Leuren Moret is an American independent scientist and international expert on radiation and public health issues.

She has devoted her life to awakening the public to the destructive consequences of the depleted uranium munitions used by the U.S. military and has made relentless efforts to stop the United States from destroying the environment.

Following is the text of a Press TV interview with Leuren Moret published on October 25/07:

Q: The U.S. is using DU weapons in violation of international treaties. Why is the international community not forcing the U.S. to stop the use and production of such weaponry?

A: I’ve asked that question many times myself. With the demonstrated total and complete failure of international judicial remedies — by the International Criminal Court and the world court — to enforce the 1925 Geneva poison gas protocol, the Geneva and Hague conventions, international agreements and other treaties, and the failure of depleted uranium weapons to meet the standards (in four out of four categories) of legality under international law, it is clear that the international judicial system is morally and procedurally bankrupt. In other words, international laws and treaties are meaningless and/or selectively enforced. Just like the U.S. nuclear weapons labs where I have worked, they selectively enforce the rules only when they want to ‘get someone’, in other words, they unfairly target and enforce laws that may be on the books, but are ignored.

And that has been true throughout the nuclear project since the end of WWII when atomic bombs, weapons of mass destruction, were dropped on living civilian populations in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, the only two Christian cities in Japan.

And that was a case of Christians dropping the first atomic bombs on Christians.

Those first atomic bombs were weapons of mass destruction and they were illegal in every sense of the law.

They were dropped without the consent of the scientists who developed them, without the consent of the political leadership (with the exception of President Truman who was talked into it by one man — Col. Henry Stimson, Sec. of War and a Wall Street banker and member of Skull and Bones), and with the strongest opposition coming from the U.S. military leadership — especially General Leslie Groves who was in charge of developing atomic bombs as head of the Manhattan Project.

The decision to drop two atomic bombs was made by one man — Colonel Henry Stimson — a Wall Street banker with ties to (Winston) Churchill and the city of London bankers. It’s always the international bankers who are engineering these horrific wars and the development of ever more horrific technologies of war.

However the hypocrisy of the U.S. government must also be addressed. Depleted uranium munitions meet the definition of WMDs under U.S. Federal Code in 2 out of 3 categories, and they violate U.S. military law because the U.S. is a signatory to the Geneva and Hague conventions. If the U.S. government is so worried about Iran being a nuclear threat, then why did Henry Kissinger give Iran nuclear power plants, and President Gerald Ford give Iran plutonium?

September 16, 2005, in the UN General Assembly, President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela said:

“We could, on the basis of national realities, exchange knowledge, integrate markets, interconnect, but at the same time we must understand that there are problems that do not have a national solution: radioactive clouds, world oil prices, diseases, warming of the planet or the hole in the ozone layer. These are not domestic problems.”

And on September 17, 2005, in the UN General Assembly President Ahmadinejad of Iran eloquently brought the depleted uranium issue to the table:

“Ironically, those who have actually used nuclear weapons, continue to produce, stockpile and extensively test such weapons, have used depleted uranium bombs and bullets against tens and perhaps hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, Kuwaitis, and even their own soldiers and those of their allies, afflicting them with incurable diseases, blatantly violate their obligations under the NPT, have refrained from signing the CTBT and have armed the Zionist occupation regime with WMDs, are not only refusing to remedy their past deeds, but in clear breech of the NPT, are trying to prevent other countries from acquiring the technology to produce peaceful nuclear energy. All these problems emanate from the fact that justice and spirituality are missing in the way powerful governments conduct their affairs with other nations. “

A third courageous world leader has also recognized that depleted uranium global pollution is the most important issue today, for example Dr. Mahathir Mohamed, former prime minister of Malaysia. He held an international war crimes conference February 5-7, 2007, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, attended by 5000 people.

The issue of radioactive weapons and depleted uranium played an important role at this conference.

So we have three world leaders now who have spoken out about the horror and illegality of depleted uranium weaponry. But the NATO countries are silent and complicit in the poisoning of Iraq, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, and Lebanon with their illegal weapons. The approximately 5000 U.S. bunker buster bombs that Israel bombed Lebanon with, in the July 2006 attack. Dr. Chris Busby has reported evidence of not only depleted uranium in the bomb craters along the Lebanon/Israel border, but also traces of deuterium, high levels of uranium 235, and neutron activation products that quickly decayed within 3 weeks. The analyses were done at the British Government Radiation Laboratory at Harwell, so they must be correct.

Those anomalous radiation fingerprints suggest that 4th generation nuclear weapons were also included in the bunker buster dirty bombs. In other words, the U.S./Israel are now carrying out two nuclear wars from within the same bomb — or shall we call it the new ‘super nuker.’ What hypocrisy for the U.S. to cry ‘terrorist’ about Iran, when U.S. bombs delivered by Israeli jets are nuking Lebanon, Israeli citizens, and everyone in the region. Well, it is well known in America that the victimizer always turns himself into the victim.

The truth is that the ‘nuclear states’ have, and are using, nuclear weapons for blackmailing weaker countries in order to depopulate them and steal their mineral resources. It’s just that simple. >>Full Article HERE

ALSO READ:

“News” vs Propaganda

Mass Media: Smoke & Mirrors

By Conquest Or Consent

Inside Report On Fluoridated Water

By Ronald Parks

I have been working for the water department for 26 years and your clip art is one of the reasons I stopped drinking the water.

One of the first jobs I was given when I came to work here… was to restart the fluoride pumps. The operators were getting erratic readings in their samples. By erratic, I don’t know if they meant too much, or too little fluoride. So I went and checked out the pumps and saw where the fluoride had been leaking out of a pipe fitting and the pump head had stopped pumping.

Where it had leaked and dripped onto the concrete pedestal, the fluoride ate a hole right through the concrete. I tightened all the fittings. This piping system is made out of PVC pipe because the fluoride will eat right through, not only concrete, but iron pipe as well. I then proceeded to take the pump head apart to see why it stopped pumping.

Being new, nobody bothered to tell me how corrosive fluoride was or how dangerous. It burned the cuts on my hands (I’m a mechanic and I get cuts on my hands) and the fumes irratated my eyes.

The inside of the pump was all black and gunked up. The ‘Master Mechanic’ told me to just clean it up, that it was nothing more than ‘tar’ and once cleaned it will work fine. So I cleaned it up and put it back together and it worked fine.

The one thing that bothered me after I was done was that no operator came behind me to make sure the calibration on the pump was correct, that they were actually dosing the system with the correct amount of fluoride. But, being the new guy and needing a job, I said nothing and I also figured these guys had been here awhile and knew what they were doing.

I decided to check the system from tank to insertion point to learn how the system works. There were a few leaks throughout which had also eaten into the concrete floor. I looked inside the tanks and saw that they were metal tanks with a rubber lining on the inside. I asked my boss about that, and he said the lining was to prevent the fluoride from eating through the tank.

Years later I found out that the lining was actually deteriorating over time and that black gunk was the results of the deterioration. So I figured that if fluoride can do that to rubber and concrete, I really didn’t want that stuff in my body.   http://rep5355.wordpress.com/history-writings/

ALSO READ:

Fluoridated Drinking Water Is POISON

 

 

Other Source Material:

U.K. Councils Against Fluoridation

http://www.preferrednetwork.com/FLUORIDE_STUPIDITY.htm

www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_6422.cfm

www.fluoridealert.org

Related articles

• Wichita voters reject fluoridated water (kansas.com)

Big Pharma Drugs Linked To Killings

By Mike Adams

America seems shocked that, yet again, a young male would pick up an assault rifle and murder his fellow citizens, then take his own life. This is what happened last night in Omaha, Nebraska, where the 19-year-old (Robert) Hawkins killed himself and eight other people with an assault rifle. Those lacking keen observation skills are quick to blame guns for this tragedy, but others who are familiar with the history of such violent acts by young males instantly recognize a more sinister connection: A history of treatment with psychiatric drugs for depression and ADHD.

It all started in Columbine, Colorado, when Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold massacred their way into the history books on April 20, 1999 by killing 12 and wounding 23 people. The mainstream media virtually glorified the event, yet utterly failed to report the connection between violence in young men and treatment with psychiatric drugs. (Both Harris and Klebold were taking antidepressant drugs.)

It’s a little known fact that antidepressant drugs have never been tested on children nor approved by the FDA for use on children. It is well established in the scientific literature, however, that such drugs cause young men to think violent thoughts and commit violent acts. This is precisely why the U.K. has outright banned the prescribing of such drugs to children. Yet here in the United States — the capitol of gun violence by kids on depression drugs — the FDA and drug companies pretend that mind-altering drugs have no link whatsoever to behavior.

Enormous evidence linking mind-altering drugs with violent acts

In 2005, I reported on this site that Eli Lilly had full knowledge of a 1200% increase in suicide risk for takers of their Prozac drug, a popular anti-depressant SSRI medication. (See http://www.newstarget.com/003086.html )

In 2006, we reported the results of a study published in the Archives of General Psychiatry showing that teens taking antidepressant drugs are more likely to commit suicide (and to be “successful” at completing the act). See http://www.newstarget.com/020643.html

On September 11, 2006, I reported on the link between antidepressant drugs and violent behavior yet again. (See http://www.newstarget.com/020394.html ) In that article, I explained, “If you’re going to alter the brain chemistry of these children, you had better be prepared for the results. The result we’re seeing now is mass killings. Elsewhere around the world, where children aren’t doped up on all these drugs, we don’t see this kind of behavior. This is what happens when you change children’s brain chemistry; you get these results…”

The very next day, we published a report about the anti-depressant drug Paxil doubling the risk of violent behavior. (See http://www.newstarget.com/020406.html ) In that article, I stated, “This finding helps explain why school shootings are almost always conducted by children who are taking antidepressants. We also know that SSRIs cause children to disconnect from reality. When you combine that with a propensity for violence, you create a dangerous recipe for school shootings and other adolescent violence.

In April of this year, I also reported on the link between antidepressant drugs and the Virginia Tech shooting. See http://www.newstarget.com/021798.html

What I said in that article has urgent application right now, following the Omaha shooting:

A study published in the Public Library of Science Medicine (an open source medical journal) explored these same links in detail. (See Antidepressants and Violence: Problems at the Interface of Medicine and Law, by David Healy, Andrew Herxheimer, David B. Menkes)

The authors note that “Some regulators, such as the Canadian regulators, have also referred to risks of treatment-induced activation leading to both self-harm and harm to others” and the “United States labels for all antidepressants as of August 2004 note that ‘anxiety, agitation, panic attacks, insomnia, irritability, hostility, aggressiveness, impulsivity, akathisia (psychomotor restlessness), hypomania, and mania have been reported in adult and pediatric patients being treated with antidepressants for major depressive disorder as well as for other indications, both psychiatric and nonpsychiatric’”.

In other words, the link between antidepressants and violence has been known for years by the very people manufacturing, marketing or prescribing the drugs. As the author of the study mentioned above concluded, “The new issues highlighted by these cases need urgent examination jointly by jurists and psychiatrists in all countries where antidepressants are widely used.”

That was last year, well before this latest shooting. The warning signs were there, and they’ve been visible for a long time. Medical authorities can hardly say they are “shocked” by this violent behavior. After all, the same pattern of violence among antidepressant takers has been observed, documented and published in numerous previous cases.

http://www.newstarget.com/020279.html

(Click the cartoon for the full-sized version.)

Not surprised at what happened in Omaha

The people of Omaha may be surprised at what happened there yesterday, but I’m not. Why? Because the shooter, Robert Hawkins, had a history of being “treated” for both depression and ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder). (Source: Associated Press)

And what is the standard American psychiatric “treatment” for these conditions? Mind-altering drugs, of course.

ADHD, for example, is treated with a drug that used to be an illegal street drug called “speed.” It’s an amphetamine, and recent research published in the August, 2007 issue of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry reveals that Ritalin and other ADHD drugs actually stunt the growth of children, causing their brains and bodies to be physically altered. (Seehttp://www.newstarget.com/021944.html )

Depression, of course, is treated with SSRI drugs, none of which have ever been safety approved by the FDA for use on children or teens. In other words, the use of these drugs on teenagers is a grand, mind-altering medical experiment, and what we just witnessed in Omaha is one result of that experiment.

There will be more. I hate to be accurate about this grisly prediction, because I grieve for the families of those lost to pharmaceutically-induced violence, but the truth is that until we stop drugging our children with psychotropic drugs, the shootings are not going to stop.

Big Pharma is to blame for this one, not the manufacturer of the gun. That gun has a trigger, you see, and the trigger was pulled by a finger. The finger was connected via a series of nerves to a brain, and that brain was altered by psychotropic drugs. The brain wasn’t functioning like a normal, healthy, well-nourished brain; it was functioning like a zoned out “zombie” brain permanently distorted by psychiatric drugs.

Sending a teenager out into the public doped up on mind-altering drugs that we KNOW are linked to violence — and jacked up on junk foods (he worked at McDonald’s) — is a certain recipe for disaster. Big Pharma executives, drug reps and the irresponsible psychiatrists who dish these pills out to teenagers might as well have just walked right into the mall and set off a bomb themselves. These are the people ultimately responsible for the tragedy in Omaha. Hawkins may have pulled the trigger, but modern psychiatry drugged him with violence-inducing chemicals. The fact that such drugs promote violence isn’t even disputed. It’s printed right on the warning labels of those drugs!

And as sad as this tragedy is for all those affected by this medication-induced violence, the truly sad part is that America still hasn’t learned this lesson. If you drug the children with chemicals that cause violence, you’re going to see more shootings. It’s as simple as that. And if you take away the guns, you’ll see bombs, knives or machetes used in these attacks. When disturbed young boys are doped up on psychotropic drugs that promote violence — and they’re drugged by the hundreds of thousands — it’s like playing a national game of Russian roulette (with apologies to Russia). Sooner or later, another kid whose mind has been altered by Ritalin, Prozac or some other drug is going to walk into yet another school or mall and start killing people. This kind of behavior is a direct product of chemical-based psychiatric “treatment.”

The criminals running modern psychiatry

In fact, I predict we’ll see another such shooting in the next 30 days, if not sooner. And yet, even with the increasing frequency of these events, the unholy alliance between Big Pharma and the immensely evil psychiatric industry will continue. Yet more children will be put on mind-altering drugs that stunt their growth, alter their brain chemistry, and turn them into mind-numbed massacre drones who acquire dangerous weapons and open fire in public places.

The psychiatric industry, though, thinks that yet MORE children need “treatment” with drugs for ADHD and depression. In fact, an industry press release recently claimed that only one-third of those children “suffering” from ADHD are receiving appropriate “treatment” for the condition. Of course, those are just code words for “drugging the children with high-profit pharmaceuticals.” When the psychiatric authorities say “treatment,” what they mean is “more drugging.”

Want to learn the horrifying, yet true, history of modern psychiatry? Check out http://www.CCHR.org – the Citizens’ Commission on Human Rights. They have a documentary so downright shocking that I couldn’t even finish watching the whole thing. It’s called Psychiatry: An Industry of Death.

Also be sure to check out the shocking book by Kelly Patricia O’Meara called Psyched Out: How Psychiatry Sells Mental Illness and Pushes Pills That Kill. This book explains exactly why kids like Robert Hawkins who have been treated with psychiatric drugs end up shooting innocents.

So what’s the solution to all this? Robert Hawkins could have been healed with a radical change in diet that supports healthy brain chemistry. His parents or caretakers should have stopped the junk food, ended the medication and put him on raw, living foods and daily superfood smoothies, fresh vegetable juices, raw nuts and seeds and other wholesome, non-processed foods. Nutrition is the single most powerful factor determining healthy moods and behavior, and virtually all young men who commit violent acts (including the vast majority of those imprisoned in the U.S. today) suffer from wild nutritional deficiencies.

Robert Hawkins could have been a healthy, stable and normal kid with the help of some real food, real nutrition and real love from a supporting family. Instead, he lived on junk food, worked at McDonald’s and took medication pills as directed by his psychiatric doctor. The results speak for themselves: This recipe of processed food and mind-altering drugs created a monster, and yesterday in Omaha, that monster exploded in a rage of violence.

If we don’t learn from all this and stop drugging our nation’s children, then those innocents in Omaha will have died in vain. And I ask the question: How many more innocent Americans must pay the price for medication-induced violence?

Ask yourself one question: Why does the FDA continue to allow these dangerous drugs to be prescribed to children and teens when 1) They have never been tested on children or teens, and 2) Other countries have already banned the prescribing of these drugs to children and teens?

Story Notes: The Associated Press originally reported Hawkins’ age as 20 years old, but corrected it to 19 years old following a correction by local police. Hawkins was not reported to have been taking medications at the precise time of the shooting, but his caretaker, Debora Maruca-Kovac, said that “he had been treated in the past for depression and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.” We do not know exactly which drugs Hawkins had been treated with in the past, and we hope the names of those drugs will surface in future reports on this tragedy.

http://www.newstarget.com/022330.html

ALSO READ:

Aspartame Alert

Be Aware Of Health Consequences

 By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.

On November 14, 2007 the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate voted for HR 1429, Head Start reauthorization. In the House version, there was a good parental consent provision. However, when the final conference report was adopted, it was the Senate version that was included. Unfortunately, this version only requires written parental consent “before administration of any non-emergency intrusive physical examination of a child….” Obviously, this is a green light for any non-emergency intrusive “mental” examination of a child. Parents across this nation should be alarmed about this action by Congress. Regrettably, President Bush is expected to sign this legislation which deliberately omits parental consent for mental health screening of young children.

In previous parts of this series, I have mentioned how fluoride in our water affects mental health. Research by Prof. Roger Masters of Dartmouth University has shown a relationship between silicofluorides in water supplies and a higher rate of crime and violent behavior. This is because silicofluorides increase the uptake and absorption of lead from the environment, and lead alters brain chemistry causing loss of self-control. Hydrofluorosalicic acid (which, unlike sodium fluoride, has never been tested for health safety in water supplies) is used in 90% of our government-supplied drinking water. Eliminating this (because the benefit of fluoride is only topical anyway) would reduce crime and violence in the U.S., saving our health and a tremendous amount of money, too.

Also in previous parts of this series, I have related that mercury in vaccines has adversely affected people’s mental health. This isn’t hard to understand, as mercury is a neurotoxin. In 1999, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the U.S. Public Health Service actually requested that all mercury-containing thimerosal be removed from vaccines. Despite this, on September 26, 2007, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rejected a petition to add new restrictions to thimerosal, even though there’s a growing body of evidence suggesting a connection between mercury and autism. In fact, if you listed the symptoms for mercury poisoning and autism, they are strikingly similar. Today, most doses of flu vaccine still contain thimerosal.

Today, 1 in 166 children have been diagnosed as having autism compared to 1 in 10,000 just a few decades ago. Actually, one shouldn’t be surprised, because young children today receive multiple shots at the same time, so that the total level of mercury they receive is greater than public health officials just a few years ago said was safe!  >>MORE

ALSO READ:

De-Population By Medicine

Most Unnecessary Surgery – Circumcision

The Case Against Circumcision

By Paul M. Fleiss, M.D.

Circumcision started in America during the masturbation hysteria of the Victorian Era, when a few American doctors circumcised boys to punish them for masturbating. Victorian doctors knew very well that circumcision denudes, desensitizes, and disables the penis. Nevertheless, they were soon claiming that circumcision cured epilepsy, convulsions, paralysis, elephantiasis, tuberculosis, eczema, bed-wetting, hip-joint disease, fecal incontinence, rectal prolapse, wet dreams, hernia, headaches, nervousness, hysteria, poor eyesight, idiocy, mental retardation, and insanity.

In fact, no procedure in the history of medicine has been claimed to cure and prevent more diseases than circumcision. As late as the 1970s, leading American medical textbooks still advocated routine circumcision as a way to prevent masturbation. The antisexual motivations behind an operation that entails cutting off part of the penis are obvious.

The radical practice of routinely circumcising babies did not begin until the Cold War era. This institutionalization of what amounted to compulsory circumcision was part of the same movement that pathologized and medicalized birth and actively discouraged breastfeeding. Private-sector, corporate-run hospitals institutionalized routine circumcision without ever consulting the American people. There was no public debate or referendum. It was only in the 1970s that a series of lawsuits forced hospitals to obtain parental consent to perform this contraindicated but highly profitable surgery. Circumcisers responded by inventing new “medical” reasons for circumcision in an attempt to scare parents into consenting.

Today the reasons given for circumcision have been updated to play on contemporary fears and anxieties; but one day they, too, will be considered irrational. Now that such current excuses as the claim that this procedure prevents cancer and sexually transmitted diseases have been thoroughly discredited, circumcisers will undoubtedly invent new ones. But if circumcisers were really motivated by purely medical considerations, the procedure would have died out long ago, along with leeching, skull-drilling, and castration. The fact that it has not suggests that the compulsion to circumcise came first, the “reasons,” later.

Millions of years of evolution have fashioned the human body into a model of refinement, elegance, and efficiency, with every part having a function and purpose. Evolution has determined that mammals’ genitals should be sheathed in a protective, responsive, multipurpose foreskin. Every normal human being is born with a foreskin. In females, it protects the glans of the clitoris; in males, it protects the glans of the penis. Thus, the foreskin is an essential part of human sexual anatomy.

Parents should enjoy the arrival of a new child with as few worries as possible. The birth of a son in the US, however, is often fraught with anxiety and confusion. Most parents are pressured to hand their baby sons over to a stranger, who, behind closed doors, straps babies down and cuts their foreskins off. The Billion-dollar-a-year circumcision industry has bombarded Americans with confusing rhetoric and calculated scare tactics.

Information about the foreskin itself is almost always missing from discussions about circumcision. The mass circumcision campaigns of the past few decades have resulted in pandemic ignorance about this remarkable structure and its versatile role in human sexuality. Ignorance and false information about the foreskin are the rule in American medical literature, education, and practice. Most American medical textbooks depict the human penis, without explanation, as circumcised, as if it were so by nature.

[...]

Circumcision is almost unheard of in Europe, South America, and non-Muslim Asia. In fact, only 10 to 15 percent of men throughout the world are circumcised, the vast majority of whom are Muslim. The neonatal circumcision rate in the western US has now fallen to 34.2 percent. This relatively diminished rate may surprise American men born during the era when nearly 90 percent of baby boys were circumcised automatically, with or without their parents’ consent.

[...]

No one has the right to cut off any part of someone else’s genitals without that person’s competent, fully informed consent. Since it is the infant who must bear the consequences, circumcision violates his legal rights both to refuse treatment and to seek alternative treatment. In 1995, the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics stated that only a competent patient can give patient consent or informed consent.⁶⁷ An infant is obviously too young to consent to anything. He must be protected from anyone who would take advantage of his defenselessness. The concept of informed parental permission allows for medical interventions in situations of clear and immediate medical necessity only, such as disease, trauma, or deformity. The human penis in its normal, uncircumcised state satisfies none of these requirements.

Physicians have a duty to refuse to perform circumcision. They also must educate parents who, out of ignorance or misguidance, request this surgery for their sons. The healthcare professional’s obligation is to protect the interests of the child. It is unethical in the extreme to force upon a child an amputation he almost certainly would never have chosen for himself.

Common Sense

To be intact, as nature intended, is best. The vast majority of males who are given the choice value their wholeness and keep their foreskins, for the same reason they keep their other organs of perception. Parents in Europe and non-Muslim Asia never have forced their boys to be circumcised. It would no more occur to them to cut off part of their boys’ penises than it would to cut off part of their ears. Respecting a child’s right to keep his genitals intact is normal and natural. It is conservative in the best sense of the word. >>Full article HERE

“Routine circumcision of babies in the United States did not begin until the Cold War era. Circumcision is almost unheard of in Europe, Southern America, and non-Muslim Asia. In fact, only 10 to 15 percent of men throughout the world are circumcised.”

“The natural penis requires no special care. A child’s foreskin, like his eyelids, is self-cleansing. Forcibly retracting a baby’s foreskin can lead to irritation and infection. The best way to care for a child’s intact penis is to LEAVE IT ALONE.”

Editor’s Note: The following commentary comes from this SOURCE , so I’m including it as an extension to the above. 

“(Bobby) Fischer is sincere in his disappointment towards Jew, but he doesn’t understand that they cannot convert to Christianity. More then 2 millennium ago the Jewish elite came up with a conceptual plan to rule the planet. They devised to religions. Christianity-the religion for slaves and Judaism-religion for slave watchers. In order to organize Jews they developed a ritual-circumcision. Yes, this ritual is used by Muslims when their kids rich the age of 12-14 year. The Jews do it on the 8th day. This exactly when a human brain develops and opens chakras. So, why on the 8th day, not on the 5th day or 231st day? Within the first 14 days a human sole opens up all 7 chakras. Within 8 days a human sole opens only 3:

muladhara-instinct, survival, security and health
svadhisthana-sexual energy, sex hormones and reproductive instincts, etc. (Are you curious now who runs the sex and porn industry?)
manipura-power, control, carrier, confidence, etc.
And all of a sudden a little boy experiences pain in the most sensitive organ. It creates a “noise” in the brain and does not develop other chakras:

anāhata-love, compassion, devotion
viśuddha-creativity, harmony, internal voice of truth
ājñā-intuition, intellectus, higher level of conscience,
sahasrāra-connection to cosmos, complete freedom

As you can see, the absence of viśuddha allows Bernanke to look straight into the camera and lie to millions of people, just like it did his predecessor Greenspan. That’s why when these people loot nations they do not burden themselves with the internal voice of truth, compassion and other garbage.

These feelings are simply not available to these people. But Jewish women do not undergo this cruel procedure as you notices they have no place in Jewish business. All business among Jews and Goiym is done by men. So the simple solution to the problem is to confiscate looted wealth and return it to looted nations.

Stop this cruel procedure and the Jews will return to natural cycle of being normal people, instead of being biological robots serving the ruling elite-who as you guessed do not follow any religions, but their own occult knowledge. That’s why you will never see Rockefeller or Rothschild in a synagogue or church. Ah, most importantly – no need for gas chambers and concentration camps.”