A friend of mine made the following comment as part of a discussion over at the Englisc Gateway forum, and it’s so good … I just had to Blog it here. The discussion surrounds the formation of new political and protest groups. By AelfredSeax:

Names, groups or amalgamations do not unite people … extraordinary circumstances do.

It does seem to be the same old faces creating new clubs, and relying on their pals from the last one to be their support. What they seem to be missing … is these ‘groups’ don’t bring people together in unity, not real unity anyway. I believe the reason that these groups don’t work, is because they are built on a negative. The whole focus of these groups are the negative affects on our people, highlighted time after time after time, which plays with the psyche – in a negative way. 

With so much negative energy, fragmentation, disagreement, and then confusion … are all that can come from it. All the negative affects are dwelled upon. But are real, viable and sustainable solutions discussed? ‘Allah is a peado’ and ‘Muslim scum off our streets’, [may] get some of the emotion across, but in a fairly childish and basic way. It’s not the kind of thing that would inspire me to get involved.

The everyday, head-down, pay-your-bills, keep-your-job (type of) Englishman knows the problems. He doesn’t need them chanted and put on placards. So, why should he join in on Saturdays to get kettled by Police while the UAF and Muslims throw missiles at him. So he can lose his job for being found guilty of a race crime, and after having achieved or furthered nothing?

What he wants … are solutions, he wants stability, he wants sanity restored, and he wants safety. It might sound unadventurous or even cowardly, but not everyone has an heroic streak. The further our nation and society is distorted, the more the Englishman will crave his simple needs. ‘Groups’ waving placards and shouting at Police and dirty students will only increase his despair.

What the Englishman is craving, is a community – a tribe. We are hardwired this way as humans, we need to belong to a functioning tribal unit. When the enemy started dismantling our nation they knew this very well. That is why they attacked the family-unit first, because every functioning tribe or community is built off a solid foundation of family and of kinship. Without kinship, altruism is lost, without altruism, we are individuals and no longer a tribe. Individuals working for a personal agenda are easy to manipulate and to tempt into selfish and anti-tribal ways.

This war was waged against us in a calculated way, and marching and shouting wont fix it. In fact, there is an argument that it could actually be making the situation worse. What we need to do is identify the damage – what went wrong – then we need to realistically think of that we can do to work towards rebuilding the affected areas. We will never vote in a political party that will repatriate NON-English people – far too much money and power is at stake for them to let us, their slave class, vote that out of their hands.

What we need to do is accept that it took many years to do the damage, and it will take a long time to fix it – as a Bricklayer I know that it takes much longer to build something than it does to dismantle it. But I also know a solid foundation makes for a sturdy structure. If we lay a sound foundation out for an alternative way of doing things to the madness of modern-day England, we can provide a beacon for others to rally to. As things get worse, the more people will see us as the shaft of light through the darkness, we will offer the vital tribe and kinship that has been smashed into bits … and taken from us.

[Race & Tribal Heritage: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JhAhY7qr0U&list=PLF603ABF92EA7EF75&index=42]

Our rich history and heritage has provided us with tribal structure, and has all the answers we need. We should try to remove ourselves as much as possible from the modern consumer society based on greed, and replace it with trade, barter and community. Our entire history is built upon it, there is no reason why it wouldn’t work. That much positive energy and forward motion couldn’t help but attract people jealous of our new found tribe. It would be starting again, we just need to make sure we have made a good enough start for when things get really messy.  >Source

Also Read:

Notting Hill Carnival

London Street Celebration

Entering 3rd World Britain

How Britain Destroyed Itself

Mogadishu On Our (British) Streets

***************************************

Telling IT, Like It Is

A Sense of Belonging

Who’s In Charge, Here?

Filed under: Britain, Immigration, Multi-Culti, Racial Minorities, White People Tagged: Britain, England, Heritage, Politics, Tribe, White nationalism, White Pride, White Tribalism ]]> http://elliotlakenews.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/reinstating-our-tribe/feed/ 2 ELN http://elliotlakenews.wordpress.com/2013/05/17/the-great-racial-divide/ http://elliotlakenews.wordpress.com/2013/05/17/the-great-racial-divide/#comments Fri, 17 May 2013 15:35:56 +0000 ELN http://elliotlakenews.wordpress.com/?p=7699 ]]> By Dr. William Pierce

[...]

There has been an enormous increase in the percentage of lawbreakers in America primarily because the social institutions that used to keep anti-social activity in check … have been destroyed: deliberately destroyed.

And this has gone hand in hand with the growth of liberal attitudes and liberal public policies.

An example: In 1930 there was a very strict policy of racial segregation almost everywhere in the United States, in the North as well as in the South. Blacks did not live in the same neighborhoods as Whites, they did not eat in the same restaurants, they did not go to the same schools, and for the most part, they did not work in the same offices and shops as Whites.

Drinking fountain on the county courthouse lawn, Halifax, North Carolina

Blacks who were found loitering in White neighborhoods, even in the daytime, were subject to arrest. Blacks and Whites did not mix socially, and so Blacks did not have much opportunity to commit crimes against Whites. Furthermore, Blacks understood that if they did commit crimes against Whites and got caught, there would be no mercy and no leniency. Punishment would be sure, swift, and severe.

[...]

The net result was that far fewer crimes against Whites were committed by Blacks, and so far fewer Blacks were in prison for offenses against Whites.

Now, the really interesting thing is that under these racially segregated conditions, Blacks also committed far fewer crimes against other Blacks. Why was that? Well, it was because Blacks had much more of a Black community, much more of a Black society of their own in America in 1930 … than they have today. They had their own schools, with their own teachers and principals. They had their own colleges. They were not flattered and pampered, or given all sorts of unrealistic expectations with the resulting frustrations. They understood their limits, what they were permitted to do, and what they were not permitted to do, what was expected of them and what was not expected. And, they adapted to their conditions moderately well.

Individual Blacks didn’t compare their conditions (achievements, or lack, thereof) to that of Whites, and as a result, become resentful and frustrated. Instead they compared their conditions to that of other Blacks. Their crime rate still was far higher than the White crime rate, but much lower than today’s figures.

Then the liberals, the egalitarians, set about removing all of the limits, setting aside all of the firm rules, abolishing the barriers between the Black society and the separate White society. They told the Blacks that they didn’t have to respect, or obey Whites any longer, that they were just as good as Whites, just as capable, and that they could enter White society and have everything the Whites had.

In February 1942, just a few weeks after the United States entered into WWII, White residents in Detroit responded to the government’s program of moving thousands of Blacks into the city and providing special housing for them, by organizing a posse of 1,200 armed men to block the entrance to one of these Black housing projects.

In June 1943, 26,000 White workers at Detroit’s Packard Motor Plant went on strike to protest the hiring of Blacks for factory jobs that had belonged exclusively to Whites. The strike turned into a riot, in which 29 Blacks and 6 Whites were killed. The government sent in Federal troops to protect the Blacks. However, Detroit was not the only American city where the Roosevelt government’s program to break down the barriers between the Black and White societies, had met with resistance from Whites.

[Today's (90% Black) Detroit city]

[...]

After World War II — under the Truman, Eisenhower, Johnson and Kennedy administrations — the government continued breaking down the barriers, continued to forcibly integrate the Black and White societies.

[...]

There was the forced racial integration of the public schools everywhere, often accompanied by bizarre programs such as forced busing for racial balance. And then there were various forced housing schemes intended to break up racially segregated neighborhoods. And there was forced “equal employment opportunity” — which, in fact, often was racially-biased hiring and promotion in favor of Blacks … under the guise of “affirmative action.”

[...]

Blacks also rioted during the 1960s — not in opposition to the government’s programs of forced racial mixing — but, because their expectations of equality were not satisfied.

The government and the Jewish media, and the liberals had been telling them for decades that they were just as good and just as capable, and just as deserving as White people, and that they could have an (equal lifestyle) as that of Whites. And when they found that most Blacks could not have everything Whites had, — when they discovered that a White life-style was not automatically forthcoming for them — they rioted and burned and looted on a huge scale. They burned Detroit and Newark, N.J. and Los Angles and Washington and 20 other American cities in the 1960s. 

The 2005 statistics show that offending rates for Blacks were more than 7 times (700%) higher than the rates for Whites.

The response of the government, the media, and the liberals to Black lawlessness was more of the same. The media and the liberals blamed both the Blacks‘ frustration and their explosions of rage on “White racism” and the government devised still more programs to force Blacks and Whites together.

But the old social constraints on Blacks were gone. They no longer had to address White people as “sir” or “ma’am.” They no longer feared, nor respected White people. And, most important, they no longer compared their own attainments with those of other Blacks, but now, with those of Whites … and the comparison infuriated them. So Black behavior took a drastic downturn, and Blacks began filling up the prisons.

SOUTH AFRICA

Just as in America … the liberals blamed Black criminality in South Africa on “White racism“. It was the effect of apartheid on Blacks which frustrated them and made them strike out at their fellow Blacks … the liberals explained. It was the White man “holding the Black man down”; it was the White man “forcing the Black man to live in crowded, dirty, and violent slums”; it was the White man “refusing to share his schools, his neighborhoods and his White women with the Black man” — that made the Black man behave in a criminal way, say the liberals. Take your foot off the Black man’s neck and treat him like a fellow human being, the liberals said to the White South Africans, and “his behavior will improve greatly“.

[...]

White people are nothing, if not gullible, and White South Africans are, if anything, even more gullible than White Americans. They listened to the liberals. They said to themselves, “yes, we’re being terrible to the Blacks by making them have their own, separate society and by policing them so strictly, and by not letting them go to school with us, or marry our women“. They felt guilty about apartheid. And so in 1994 they turned their country over to the Black majority in South Africa.

[...]

And the Black man’s behavior suddenly became much worse than it had been before. Not only did he begin raping, robbing, and murdering Whites on an unprecedented scale, but he also began committing more crimes against his fellow Blacks than ever before.

[Other Websites: Violence Against Whites

Stuff Black People Don't Like

Life in the Black townships has become much more violent and dangerous than it was prior to Black rule. And Blacks in rural areas are being burned and stoned to death by their fellow Blacks on charges of witchcraft and sorcery. When the Whites were in charge, they didn't tolerate that sort of thing. But now the Blacks are in charge, and many of them are wishing the Whites were running the country again. Crime is so bad that they long for apartheid again, a time when they felt much safer.

[...]

The same two things changed suddenly for Blacks in South Africa in 1994 as changed for Blacks in America over a period of several decades. White control was relaxed, and Black society lost its boundaries, as it was told to merge with White society.

And the results were very similar: an explosion of Black criminal behavior. The liberals, of course, have an explanation for Black behavior in South Africa, just as they do in the United States. It’s payback time, they say. The Blacks are still angry about having their human rights violated under apartheid, and that’s why they’re murdering White farmers and raping their White women, and stealing cars from White men … the liberals explain. It’s a little more difficult for the liberals to explain why the Blacks also are killing and robbing and raping more of their own people now.

[...] When Blacks are able to compare their condition, their attainments, their status with those of other Blacks, they can deal with it. When they begin comparing themselves with Whites, the result is frustration, resentment, anger, and criminal behavior.

And, I also should mention that the government’s attempt to force a multicultural society in America has resulted in an increase in criminal behavior on the part of Whites, too. >To Full Article

Also Read:

“Useful Idiots”

Closer To The Edge

Perils of Racial Diversity

************************

“I Am a WHITE Man”

White Tribal Thinking

Do Whites Have Rights?

“White Pride” DENIED Trademark

********************************

Blacks LESS Intelligent?

***********************

Crime & Race

Mob Violence In America

FRANCE Is Falling Fast

Importing Black Crime to CANADA

Black Violence Comes To IRELAND

AUSTRALIA Meets With BLACK Crime

Related articles

• Racial Segregation (vt2013group9.wordpress.com)
• Racial segregation in the UK. (politics.ie)

Multiculturalism, a new religion? Why not?

We bow to the “God of Multiculti“, our Police Commissioners tip-toe with nervous apprehension when faced with the daily realities on how to accommodate this new religion, and are extremely nervous as to how to deal with strange peoples from strange lands bringing with them strange customs.

The Police, too … have been unwittingly seduced, and have been known to kneel in strict observance in reverence to this unholy religion. The ordinary Policeman or Women? Well … theirs is not to question why, or they will face a disciplinary board faster than their feet can touch the ground.

Our government also seduces its own people to give up their ethnic uniqueness and identity, and instead, are encouraged to wallow like swine in this festering mish-mash of a violent Multi-Culti society.

The island people are speechless and stand in awe, unaware that their day to day perceived freedoms are non-existent, but they are unknowingly moulded and cunningly crafted to ensure unwanted Multiculturalism is thrust upon them without dissent. We are not alone; many other western countries are now plagued by the effects of its poisonous tentacles.

“We must embrace diversity and enrichment” shout the New Architects; more expressions from Mr. [George] Orwell’s world of (the novel) “1984″?

But in truth, what do these words actually mean? They are just words, because in truth, these people do NOT WANT to diversify, and 3rd world violence does NOT “enrich” a civilised nation. The invaders do not even diversify with other imported “exotic” cultures, thus we see the appearance of Ghetto’s, — sorry — visible-ethnic-minority clusters in many of our decaying major cities as experienced in many of Europe’s once peaceful cities. I repeat … it is a cruel illusion.

If approximately 4,000 of our own people who have been murdered by these ‘Enrichers’ who have been invited into OUR country to “enrich” and share our culture … then it IS an illusion.

The establishment and Police will not warn the people of this silent, murder by stealth of its own people because it smacks of institutionalised racism. The lives of our people are easily expendable and any serious dissent can be kept in check by threats of incarceration; a small price to pay to foster uncertainty upon them to meekly accept this new Muti Culti religion.

If our government is forced to bring out strict laws to enforce this Multi Culti religion, then it’s obvious it is unwanted by its own people. Just as there are strict laws to protect our people against Murder, Rape and Paedophilia, it is just another evil. What makes it even more obscene is that the government that enforce it — are also our own people.

So what is its aim? Like “Winston Smith“ in Orwell’s (novel) prophesies of “1984″ (written in 1948) — I thought I knew — but it is too complex for me to understand. There are too many variables; it is protean in its concept. I sometimes wonder if the government have unleashed a terrible Genie out of the bottle and they now realise that in the very near future they will not be able to control this evil monster, thus we are seeing our security and intelligence services being beefed up.

They are now employing increasing numbers of these same invaders to help warn and combat the threats — which mark my words — will one day turn our streets into 1st world killing grounds.

So where are the violent threats coming from — our own people?

Most certainly not … but from the very people who are part of this multicultural illusion, the armies of the Genie. Keeping the stopper on the bottle would have saved at least 4,000 of our people’s lives. But it just proves who cares? The perpetrators are STILL in power.

The future “Winston Smith” might not be surprised to be stopped in the street one day by a officer in a blue uniform, speaking broken English, wearing medals and ribbons for devotion and loyalty to the Federation and on his shoulder a identification patch with the letters EQRG (Eurabia Quick Response Group) surrounded by yellow stars. By then, as Orwell’s “Winston Smith” found out much to his consternation, it will be too late, he thought he knew who his enemies were too, but the hidden enemy were his own people.   > Source

WELCOME TO THE BRAVE NEW WORLD.

Excellent speech by Jared Taylor (1996)
<a href=”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TpJmb3fOqsI&list=PLF603ABF92EA7EF75″>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TpJmb3fOqsI&list=PLF603ABF92EA7EF75</a&gt;

Also Read:

Race Diversity? Why?

Multi-Racial IRELAND?

Destroying European Civilization

Multiculturalism – A DIVIDING Force

*************************************

“A Racial Program for the 20th Century”

50,000,000 Africans INVITED To Europe

******************************************

My Awakening Experience

Multi-Culti Used to Destroy National Identity

Also Read:

ANTI-White Media

AWM: ANTI-White Media (Blog)

TV Commercials Insult White People

**********************************

De-humanizing Men

ANTI-White Brainwashing

Guilt-Tripping WHITE People

******************************

Blacks LESS Intelligent?

Affirmative Action in Action

By INP

Old people make me sick.

Not all old people. Not Canadian old people. It’s those FOREIGN old people who fill up my Canadian city. They’re the ones who make me sick.

OK … maybe they don’t actually “make” me sick … but they certainly make it difficult to “get better”.

Getting better health-wise is more difficult when you have to wait in a hospital emergency waiting room BEHIND seventeen turbaned, or hijabed 70 year olds who arrived in Canada — YESTERDAY – under our ludicrous ‘family reunification’ program. (Not many old people arrive here from Scotland, France or Ireland to clog up our already over taxed health care system.  I don’t see too many of them.)

Old foreigners make me sick because they make me, and my elderly Canadian relatives wait AFTER them. We wait for doctor’s appointments, we wait for nursing home beds, we wait for chronic care, we wait for long term care, we wait for medical testing, we wait for essential surgery, we wait in emergency rooms, we wait and wait and wait BEHIND these queue-jumping old foreigners.

[See: Canadian Generosity Vs. Stupidity

Foreign Seniors Displacing Canadians]

Sometimes we wait so long that we die. And then we go to heaven. Where else would such generous, selfless compassionate people go? I hear that God has a special surprise for old Canadians who die waiting for medical treatment. They are reincarnated as the old parents of Federal Cabinet Ministers, and, they never have to wait for medical treatment again.

God also has a surprise in store for the people who immigrate to Canada, and then bring their old parents over to suck the life out of OUR health care system. I hear that God brings them back after death reincarnated as obese, blind, crippled old Liberals with renal failure and chronic pain who can’t find a family physician or a specialist.

Now that’s poetic justice. God’s humble way of giving the real, unhyphenated Canadians, who lived here all their lives — and who die waiting in line behind old foreigners – a bit of restitution and justice.

Every day, millions of Canadians, especially old Canadians – the ones who lived and paid taxes in Canada all their lives – are faced with long waiting lists for vital, essential medical services. And everyday, dozens, if not hundreds of old foreigners shuffle out of planes and ships onto Canadian soil for the very first time, and take a taxi to their children’s homes or apartments where they don’t work or pay taxes or contribute to Canada. They just wait patiently until that inevitable day when something goes wrong with their health. Then they simply call 9-1-1 and take that FREE ride in that FREE ambulance to the big shiny FREE hospital full of all the FREE equipment that will extend their lives, so they can use all the marvelous FREE stuff again and again.

Except its not free. It was bought with money, and it was bought with flesh and blood. Money from taxes paid over a lifetime by that sick old Canadian standing over there waiting patiently (like all good Canadians do) while the old foreigner receives their medical treatment first.

[See: No Punjabi, No Job for Canadian Nurse]

It was the flesh & blood from people who came here years ago (PHOTO), BEFORE everything was free, and who sacrificed to build a nation for their children. Now, their children (and children’s children) suffer and die while waiting in line behind recently-arrived old foreigners who have sacrificed nothing, and to whom we owe nothing.

German immigrants at Quebec City, Canada. (Circa 1910

Maybe the government hasn’t heard, but there is a demographic crises happening in all Western civilized nations. Canada is no exception. The population is aging. The ratio of young people to old – workers to retirees has never been larger in the history of our nation. It is thought that in 20 – 30 years there won’t be enough young people in Canada to support the huge number of old people.

Politicians know all about this. They know exactly what’s going on. Sadly, their need to curry votes in Canada’s ethnic communities is more important to them than the health and welfare of Canadian citizens. They allow old foreigners to flood into Canada, to the tune of 40,000 Foreign Oldsters a year (almost all from NON-white, 3rd world countries), because it is in their political interest.

Ethnic communities will vote for the politician that acts in their best interest. And they want mommy and daddy here with them — damn the cost to the rest of us. They might sympathise with sick Canadians, but they won’t pull mommy out of line so a Canadian can see the doctor first. They take care of their own first. Is it wrong for the rest of us to do the same?

The truth is that we don’t NEED any more old people. We are growing more than enough of our own. And yet the parasitical travesty that is our “family reunification program” continues unabated. In my view, no one over the age of 40 should be allowed to immigrate to Canada. We have too many old people to support already.

I have heard the plaintive arguments in favor of allowing immigrants to bring their old parents here to Canada as permanent residents. One argument is that many immigrants would simply go to some other country that allows family reunification. So what, I say. If they want to put their own interests above those of their Canadian benefactors, to hell with them. And legal immigrants who come to Canada can visit their parents in their OWN homeland, or bring them over for short visits. Our health care system will be less labored because of it.

Also, there are those immigrants who’re occasionally trotted out onto TV programs, moaning piteously with their sob stories that they “need” their old mother and father “to mind their six kids because they can’t afford child care”. Oh, cry me a river. Hey Akmed, try having one or two children like us normal Canadians, and you wouldn’t need to foist YOUR sick, old parents onto OUR health care system just to save yourself a few bucks in baby-sitting fees.

Old foreigners make me sick. Most of them have contributed nothing to this nation and have never worked a day in Canada in their lives. Now, after spending all their lives contributing to their own precious, foreign homelands, they drag themselves over to CANADA, the land of FREE (for them) healthcare. They expect tolerant, elderly Canadians to smile as they’re pushed aside, so they can line up in FRONT for home care, doctors appointments, nursing home beds, surgeries and other vital social services.

As I grow older I become more angry about this abuse of Canadian goodwill. Someday, I’ll be an old Canadian sitting in the ER (emergency room) surrounded by sick, old foreigners muttering quietly in their foreign language while they wait in line AHEAD of me for treatment. Well, they just better hope that I don’t have a terminal disease. Because, with nothing to lose, I might decide to take a few of them with me.

Kind reader, it’s time to start giving our OWN old people priority over foreigners. No one should work and pay taxes their entire lives in their OWN country, only to find themselves waiting BEHIND a bunch of old foreigners when requiring vital medical treatment. It’s just not right.   >Source

Also Read:

Health-Care CARD FRAUD

More Health-Care Cards Than People

***********************************

Canada Is Too Accommodating

Canada – Land of Pandering Fools

Canada Open To Immigrant Abuse

Related articles

• Insiders say Canada ‘scammed’ by foreign worker industry (cbc.ca)
• Temporary Foreign Workers Vs Canadian Citizens (elliotlakenews.wordpress.com)

If an ANTI-white American teacher or professor mentions some destructive effects of European exploration and settlement in the Western Hemisphere without mentioning the lessons that indigenous White Europeans received in destruction at the hands of Mongols, Turks, and Arabs for 900 years PRIOR to, and simultaneously with, the great European explorations in the 1400s, 1500s, 1600s, and 1700s,… then remind them about the great invasions, and their likely influence, on the mind-set of (today’s) Europeans.

Taizu, better known as Genghis Khan.

A critical tactic by white-hating people is “clock-setting” or “clock-starting.” This means that any narrative, or story about history, has a beginning point which is always arbitrary, and serves to deceive readers about history by selecting a beginning point that disadvantages one or another of the narrative’s participants.

An excellent example appeared on the 01/02/03 CounterPunch website in an essay by a professor of economics at Northeastern University named M. Shahid Alam. The relevant part is in the sixth paragraph which engages in “clock-starting” in 1492, as follows:

“Starting in 1492, the guns of the West have been pointed incessantly outward. For more than five hundred years, the steel of the Western sword, lance, gun and bomb have been planted in the bones and flesh of Africans, Australians, Asians and native Americans….Over 500 years, entire continents were devastated, societies over-thrown, their civilizations denigrated, their peoples decimated, herded into slavery and stranded without dignity.”

This is the Big Lie version of world history that is taught today at most universities and high schools in the USA. Professor Alam resolutely ignores the dangers and destructions facing White indigenous Europeans and cultures from the Asian-based Mongols, Asian-based Turks, and Asian- and African-based Arabs during the same time period.

Diverse White European cultures faced destruction many times before, and since 1492, but those parts of history are concealed by dishonest professors like Professor Alam whose only interest is in promoting a debased picture of White European histories, diversities, cultures, and societies that magically commenced in 1492. Incidentally, “1492″ and “five hundred years” are frequently code words that identify the Alam historical narrative.

The campaign of defamation against the diverse White American peoples has included the suppression in high schools and colleges, of knowledge about the invasions of Europe within historical memory, each of which had a profound and continuing impact on the shared perceptions of the diverse White American peoples. Young White Americans never learn of these profound influences on their histories, heritages, cultures, and diversities in our public schools.

For example, research reveals that the anti-Asian sentiment in California in the mid-1800s, included vivid memories of the great invasions and destruction of homes, hometowns, churches, states, and people by the Mongol Empire which wasn’t finally crushed until the time of Catherine the Great of Russia — when George Washington was president.

Catherine the Great – the most famous Russian Empress of German descent

True history would include the long-lasting and historically recent Mongol, Turkish, and Arab invasions into Europe that shaped the indigenous White European perceptions of each of the three peoples, and continues to frame those perceptions among many diasporic White Americans.

One centuries-long series of brutal militaristic invasions into Europe was the North African-based Arab, Berber, and Turkish incursions and slave-takings for 700 years in Southern and Western Europe that only ended in 1492.

Given that the generally ANTI-European and ANTI-Christian bias in Wikipedia, the reader may find there, a moderately accurate account of the Battle of Tours in 732 which marked the farthest invasion of Western Europe by Arabs.

MILLIONS of Spanish, Portuguese, French, Italian, and Sicilian peoples were slaughtered, or enslaved and sold at slave markets in Africa and Asia. There were no fewer than 4 major bloody Arab and Berber crusades into Southern Europe during this period.

Also — for centuries — Turkish warlords on the North African coast indulged in massive slave-taking operations and massacres of indigenous European peoples from Ireland, England, Scotland, Iceland, and all along the Adriatic, North Atlantic, and North Mediterranean coasts.

American shipping in the early years of the American republic was also oppressed by the Turkish warlords dwelling among the Arabs and Berbers along the North African coast.

A 2nd – centuries-long series — of plundering and butchering crusades was by the Asian Mongols and lasted for 550 years in Eastern and Central Europe.

Millions of Europeans were slaughtered or sold at slave markets in Asia. These invasions did not completely end until around the end of the American war for independence when Catherine the Great of Russia wiped out the last Mongol-installed khanate (kingdom) on the Crimean peninsula in 1783.

Dozens of European principalities and cities were destroyed by Mongol armies as they converted the populated plains and river basins of East and Central Europe into grazing grounds for horses and cattle.

More Europeans were killed by Mongols than those killed by Stalin, Hitler, and Napoleon combined. (You may also include Eisenhower, Roosevelt & Churchill in that group - ELN Editor)

The viciousness of the Mongol invasions is shown by the fact that they engaged in the first recorded biological warfare. European merchants at trading posts on the coast of the Black Sea were driven out when Mongols hurled dead bodies of victims of the Bubonic Plague (the Black Death) over the trading post walls. When the traders retreated to Venice, the Bubonic Plague accompanied them and led to death by disease of up to 50% of all Europeans in the mid-1300s.

A 3rd — centuries-long series — of marauding and vicious militaristic crusades into Europe was the Asian Turkish invasions and slave-takings in Central Europe for 500 years that ended only about 90 years ago with the collapse of imperial Turkey into its present boundaries. These imperialist crusades took the Turkish empire all the way to the coast of Italy and the walls of Vienna. (More) millions of Europeans were enslaved and sold at slave auctions in North Africa and Southwest Asia.

(Again), given the generally ANTI-European and ANTI-Christian bias in Wikipedia, the reader may find there a moderately accurate account of the Battle of Vienna in 1529 which marked the farthest invasion into Central Europe by Turks.

One depraved feature of the Turkish empire was the frequent slave roundup (“child levy“) throughout the Slavic nations, as far north as the city walls of Moscow and Warsaw. These were no simple, mercantile affairs like the Asian Arab slave-taking expeditions hundreds of miles into the east coast of Africa. These were well-financed and state-run roundups (child-stealing) of young Europeans (and often the murder of their parents). >Source

Also Read:

North American WHITE Slavery

Untold Story of WHITE Slavery

Related articles

• Protests Against White Separatism Group Planned at Park (amren.com)

In one of the more outrageous recent cases of the “pot calling the kettle black”, the blacks-only Metropolitan Black Police Association (BPA) has again … accused the Metropolitan Police of London, England, of being “institutionally racist.”

Metropolitan Police officers in London’s Trafalgar Square

This cry of “institutional racism” is nothing else but NON-whites decrying the fact that they tend to be stopped, searched and arrested more often than Whites. The reason for this is, of course, because as a statistical average, NON-whites commit more crime than Whites.

However, rather than admit this obvious fact, NON-white organisations such as the “Metropolitan Black Police Association” and White liberals, will prefer instead … to blame White people. This tactic is used the world over to excuse high NON-white crime rates (in White countries), or even failure to perform properly at any level in western society.

[What’s the percentage (%) of WHITE PEOPLE on Earth?  ANSWER.]

The irony of a blacks-only organisation calling another body “institutionally racist” is also lost on these people, who genuinely think that only they have the right to organise along racial grounds. If any London police officials had to set up a “Metropolitan White Police Association” they would be drummed out of the force as “racist.”

According to the black police organisation, “Institutional racism is not about labelling individuals racists, but rather police practice and procedures that bring about disproportionate outcomes for black and minority ethnic communities and police personnel.”

In other words, black members of the force don’t do as well in the tests and courses set out to achieve promotion within the police—and therefore Whites are to blame.

In addition, the BPA has blamed the (White) police for not recruiting enough NON-whites, implying that it is once again White peoples’ fault that blacks, Pakistanis, Chinese and the huge mixture of races in London, shy away from joining law enforcement.

According to the BPA, the “2011 census indicated that over 40% of Londoners were from BME backgrounds, whilst only 10% of MPS police officers were from BME communities.” (Note: Typically, they have their figures wrong. The latest UK census showed that 54% of Londoners were from ‘Black and Minority Ethnic’ –BME—communities).

“These officers disproportionately hug the lower ranks, face significantly slower rates of career progression and are over-represented in disciplinary actions, in comparison to their White counterparts,” the BPA continued.

Note once again, the “blame whitey” phenomenon. Because NON-white police officers commit more internal offenses, and are thus “over-represented in disciplinary action,” it is White peoples’ fault—not that of the offending officers.

This situation, the BPA claims is “unsustainable, as it severely impacts on police legitimacy and more importantly erodes trust and confidence in BME communities.”

The logic is breath-taking, and possibly only the arrogance exceeds its stupidity. The BPA is saying that because NON-white police officers commit more internal offenses than White officers, and do poorly on internal promotional exams, the rest of the NON-white community blames White people for “racism” and therefore does not trust them.

The madness goes on: Superintendent Leroy Logan, chair of the Met BPA (Metropolitan Black Police Association) charitable trust, said … before the (Police) force could consider itself free of “institutional racism“, it must tackle the continuing disproportions in the treatment of minority Londoners.

“The real litmus test is still the vexed issue of stop and search and its disproportionality in black and minority ethnic (BME) communities, because so many people perceive that the police are involved in racial profiling?”

Metropolitan Police Service helmet

A recent review of “stop-and-search policing” in London found that black “youths” are up to six times more likely to be stopped than Whites, and that in “authorised localised stops” under section 60 of the 1994 Public Order Act, NON-whites are 28 times more likely to be stopped.

Once again, this is because the evidence is clear that those communities commit more crime, not because of “White racism.” >Source: Western Spring U.K.

(Added for emphasis are all Bold and underlined words, with added links by ELN Editor)

Also Read:

Police Racial Discrimination

British Police Self-Destructing

Wanted: Less Qualified Police

“And You Call ME … A Racist“

****************************

Toronto Police “Losing Face”

Police Uniforms NOT Uniform

****************************

Blacks LESS Intelligent?

Group (Race) Differences Are Real

[...]

Throughout history there have always been people who were right, and usually a “majority” that were wrong, on any single issue. Defenders of institutionalized ignorance argue constantly that truth is “relative”, and that they should not be criticized for having their own “opinions”.

Sheople

They use this relativism as a cover for their unwillingness to admit a lack of knowledge. I would ask them if they believe that they are always right? That they have nothing to learn? If the truth is “relative”, if morality and principle are “gray”, then who in their mind has ever been wrong? It would seem that the only people they view as absolutely amiss are those who confront the establishment. Those that question the system they are so addicted to.

What they fail to understand is that their “opinions” were never theirs to hold. What they believe has merely been conditioned into them. They are willing to embrace the system no matter how unjust, because their entire identity is predicated on its continued existence. We do not admonish people necessarily because they are unaware (all of us were unaware at one time or another), but we do admonish them for denying the blatant facts in order to avoid admitting that they are wrong, and that they have perhaps been duped by the establishment. So, what do we call those people who remain willfully ignorant (or comfortably oblivious) in the face of the facts and follow along with the herd (the mainstream) to the detriment of the truth?

We call them sheeple…

The term “sheeple” has quickly become a word that defines an era. It is not just a tool for ridicule, though it does indeed seem to hurt the feelings of the ignorant and unaware, which to my mind, is a good thing (If they can feel shame over their factual inadequacies, then perhaps one day they can be redeemed). No, there is much more going on here…

When one is surrounded by blatant absurdity and total loss; loss of freedom, loss of compassion, loss of humanity, that person needs a way to describe the horror. A way to shed light on the dark insanity of it. A way to remove the barriers of confusion and build a clear path to reason. He needs to quantify the threat, so that he can move beyond it, and towards understanding.

[...]

It is the greatest and most exploitable weakness of man; our willingness to sacrifice anything in order to avoid admitting we know nothing. This is the philosophical slum of the common “sheeple”. It is pathetic, and it is ugly, and it is a rampant plague upon the world in the year of 2013.

Pointed guns, no legal right to entry, no search warrants. Get out of your own homes and put your hands up!! This is America, today! More here.

The time is coming, very soon I believe, when the sub-populous of “sheeple” will be used as cannon fodder to institute change in America on an unprecedented scale. It has happened many times throughout history.

The establishment, seeking unlimited power, brandishes the dimmer subsections of the citizenry like a political Louisville Slugger, swinging them about wildly in an attempt to smash the ideological enemies of the state. Often, the “sheeple” are oblivious to the fact that they are being used as a weapon against liberty, and against truth. They only know that they must participate to “survive”, even if that survival ends up being a hollow and meaningless life.

Institutionalized Laziness

Some “sheeple” are not ignorant because they are unintelligent. Rather, they are ignorant because they refuse to expend any energy in discovering the facts of their world. They have become used to the idea of being “taught”, rather than going out to learn for themselves. It is easier to be told what to think than it is to develop one’s own world view. “Sheeple” often state that they “just want to be left alone”, and “don’t want to think about the troubles of the world”, yet nearly all of them, at the same time, want to feel as though they have an effect on the future. They want the benefits of a sound and balanced society but don’t want to put in the work to make such a society possible. They want “other people” to make the system work, and “other people” are certainly willing to take advantage of sheeple inaction. Tyranny cannot exist unless people willingly hand over their personal responsibilities to the system. “Sheeple” make oligarchy and dictatorship possible.

Arrogance Without Merit

I have met many people in my life that are not fully aware of how their world works or why terrible things happen to them. This by itself is not necessarily bad. If one is able to accept that he needs to learn more, then he has far surpassed most of society in the strength of his character. Unfortunately, sheeple do not share this attitude. They not only lack remedial knowledge on most issues, they are also unwilling to admit it, and, even viciously attack those who DO have substantial information.

Is this due to an inferiority complex? Possibly. They are so invested in the mainstream world view as presented by media entities and government that they take it as gospel. They live the mainstream ideal, but, secretly, they harbor doubts. They know that they do not have the capacity to defend the system if confronted by an intelligent and well-versed opponent, and so, they develop a demeanor of arrogance and contempt for those who question it. This uppity manner is a defense mechanism meant to hide the weakness of their arguments. Combined with Ad hominem attacks, distraction, and physical threats, sheeple try to ward off critics so they do not have to engage in a legitimate debate they know they will lose.

Always Worried What The “Majority” Thinks

“Sheeple” are steeped in the realm of the mainstream. So much so, that they have become nothing but a cog in the machine of the collective mind (or hive mind). Their entire existence is predicated on blind faith in the system. If the system is proven to be flawed, then THEY are proven to be flawed by extension. They will ignore all reason and defend the system wildly, as if trapped by some cult, because their fragile identity is dependent upon the continued prosperity of the establishment.

“Sheeple” are in most cases motivated by nothing but fear. In their early years they likely either caved to the force of peer pressure and learned to diminish their personal pain by constantly conforming to the majority view. Or, they sought inclusion in the majority very early on and became addicted to the power that the collective is able to wield over others. In either case, they never actually questioned whether or not the “majority” was right in its behavior. Instead, they decided at some point in their life that the majority is ALWAYS right … simply because it is the majority.

[...]

Predictable Responses

“Sheeple” are highly predictable two-dimensional creatures. When confronted with their own failings, they will follow a pre-programmed list of responses meant to divert and confuse discussion.

They will claim that “everyone thinks they are smarter than everyone else”, and that really, the “truth is relative”. History does not support this twisted view, however. There are always moments in which some people are morally and intellectually correct, while many others are dangerously misguided. Some people make decisions that lead to chaos and destruction while others make decisions that lead to prosperity and creation. The truth, the cold hard truth, is NOT relative. It is unyielding, it is uncompromising, and it is final. To be successful as human beings requires us to be on the right side of truth more often than we are not. To assume that the truth is “malleable” to our particular desires of the moment is to always be on the wrong side.

“Sheeple” rely primarily on character assassination and belligerent disregard for logic in order to derail debate. They do not attack your position so much as they attack you personally. They scoff, they giggle, they taunt like children, but when it’s all over … they usually say very little of any substance.

Finally, they will use the weapon of majority opinion as a get-out-of-jail-free card, and in most cases this is not a ploy. They really do believe that if the larger percentage of the public accepts a conviction, then that conviction automatically becomes fact. Their goal, therefore, is to constantly ride the wave of majority opinion so that they will always be in a position of “righteousness”. Of course, this way of thinking has in the past led to some of the worst atrocities in recent memory. The collective mind has no concern for individual freedom, including the freedom to live in peace. Physical and psychological violence in the name of conformity is very common in such cultures.  >to Full Article

Also Read:

Militarizing Police Forces

Police-State Enforcers

Police Professionals in RETREAT

Related articles

• We the Sheeple (lewrockwell.com)

*******************************************************************************************

Now, “Adolf Hitler” returns with a few words of his own!

If youtube suddenly removes this politically-incorrect video — as they often do — viewers have a backup source here: http://trutube.tv/video/6002/AntiRacist-Hitler

Also Read:

“A Racial Program for the 20th Century”

The Harold Rosenthal Interview

Tail Wagging the Dog

For a more in-depth analysis and description of Nationalist Germany before 1945, readers are encouraged to read these informative websites to learn the hidden truth.

http://justice4germans.wordpress.com/

http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/welcome.html

Any seasoned traveller will attest to the fact that Heathrow (International Airport)  is a dreadful place.

Grossly inefficient, badly run, incomprehensible work practises. In any good airport transfer passengers will merely exit one plane and head for the appropriate gate to embark on the next one. No need for customs or passport formalities as one remains ‘airside’, which infers that all relevant controls are in place. But today, by the time I had landed at Terminal 4, to embarking at Terminal 1, I had to go through no fewer than four security checks.

And here’s the rub.

The “security” was provided by a scurvy bunch of mad-eyed, bearded Muslim fanatics — burkah clad Afghans (and) Blacks who seemed to have just emerged from the jungle. It’s not allowed, but to underline my point I discreetly photographed a representative sample, shown here.  Do you need further proof?

Yes, the specimens you see here … force blond and blue-eyed English girls (to go) through humiliating ‘security’ tests … remove your shoes, come over here while I grope your private parts, go back again through the scanner. Brandishing their security clearance, in the event of, even a weary sigh from the victims.

Osama bin Laden in 1997

As I went through yet another ‘security’ procedure, this time performed by an Osama bin Laden look-alike, contemplating as I did, the virtual certainty of my luggage getting mislaid (it did!) … I sighed that this was like a Turd World airport.

And then the penny dropped with a loud clang. It IS a Turd World airport, for Chrissake! Because with close to 80% of the staff there emanating from South Asia or Africa … by definition … it IS Turd World.

 How come that never dawned on me before?  >Source

Also Read:

Entering “3rd World” Britain

How Britain Destroyed Itself

Perils of Racial Diversity

*********************

Message to White Americans