Millions of media words were readily made available to the British public in reporting the Stephen Lawrence case since his 1993 stabbing death.

Mainstream media has essentially made a martyr out of the Black victim in this case, while White British murder victims killed by Black and Asian minorities are deemed not worthy of wide publicity. Violent crimes, including murders instigated by racial minorities towards Whites are simply not given enough national exposure, but they may receive 18 seconds of local coverage.

This entire Stephen Lawrence saga has not only cost police careers, but also concluded that London’s Metropolitan police force was “institutionally racist”  as stated by the infamous Macpherson Report.

Long standing British Laws that stood the test of time for hundreds of years were changed when it was  recommended the double jeopardy rule be abrogated in murder cases to allow a retrial upon “new and compelling evidence“.  Incredibly, that became law in 2005.

A “honey pot” in the name of the Stephen Lawrence Charitable Trust was also established for purposes of fund-raising, but no link will be provided here.

In total, the media frenzy helped propel this case to stratospheric levels of publicity and cost taxpayers tens of millions of British pounds over the years.

The Stephen Lawrence case is so well-known that his name has become a British household word since those early days in 1993, and whose body was transported and buried in Jamaica!

ALSO READ:

Slanted// MSM News

Crime, Race & Media

Independent Journalists – NOT!

***********************************

Media Bias On Race Reporting

Mainstream Media Silent On Horrific Murders

Related articles

• Two guilty of Stephen Lawrence murder in Britain (vancouversun.com)
• Wasting Police Time Pursuing “Thought Criminals”
• Stephen Lawrence murder case changed face of policing in Britain, says The Sun (thesun.co.uk)

WHO is this mystery man??

ALSO:

Deception Was My Job

Hierarchy of Multiculturalism

Related articles

• Yuri Bezmenov – Deception Was My Job (1 of 9) (newsworldwide.wordpress.com)

ALSO READ: 

The White Riddle

A White Racial Crisis

White Identity Politics

 “A Racial Program for the 20th Century” 

Multi-Culti Used To Destroy National Identity

************************************************

Truth, Heresy, & Heroes

Related articles

• “Useful Idiots” (elliotlakenews.wordpress.com)

These are a few questions that recur in my mind that I’ve never heard of anyone addressing:

Why are most White people unwilling to defend their own, or even to identify with their own folk, while at the same time many people have fierce allegiances to people of their own sex?

It seems almost as though the natural ethnocentrism or ethnoloyalty has been superseded by the loyalty to one’s sex.

For example, women in general are militantly pro-female and always touting the idea that ”it’s time for a woman president.” Women are often, dare I say it, female chauvinists who believe females are morally superior and naturally ”wise” and peaceful, therefore they should be in leadership positions.

Why is this loyalty to one’s own sex not considered “sexism”, as loyalty to one’s race is ”racism”?

Photo H/T: http://www.wvwnews.net/

Again, many people in our society today identify more with their favorite sports team than with their actual folk or tribe/clan, or ethny. Do these things take the place of kin loyalty or clan/tribe loyalty?

Another thought: why is it OK for homosexuals to be averse to the opposite sex, and prefer only those of their own sex and appearance, while it is called “xenophobic”  to prefer our own people or kin group… to those unlike us?

It almost seems as if there is something gone awry with the ‘wiring’ of many people today. The natural order of things is overturned, and people call it “good”.  -Source

[Editor’s Note: To further elaborate on the phenomenon described by Vanishing American… why do supposedly grown adults still act in the manner of 14 yr. olds who paint their faces with colors or wear jerseys representing their favorite team sport franchises? Many grown men appear to be fighting the clock and prefer to remain in a state of delayed adolescence that supposedly abrogates  their responsibility to reach for mature adulthood.

Do they have the wherewithal to question themselves as to why they maintain these juvenile behavior patterns at an age, when perhaps, it’s time to prepare themselves for growing into a maturity level equal to their own age? Could team sporting events be “bread and circus” events designed to keep the gullible masses distracted from more important issues happening around the world? And look at the above photo again. If that pathetic scene demonstrates the role of male masculinity in today’s world, then I submit we’re in deep trouble.

But having said that, there are other contributing factors that may have led us away from “the natural order of things“.

Numerous print and television stories are revealing how our hormones are being altered by various chemicals in the food we eat, the water we drink, and in the air we breathe. In addition, we’re bombarded with daily television scenes of effeminate men portrayed as somewhere between a male and a female, or emasculated white males under the authority of racial minorities or women, and often both… a Black woman!

The Hollywood executive crowd works overtime in snuffing out White masculine role-playing in their propaganda studios. Try counting the number of times when television shows match two or three White males working together without the token Black man, Black woman, or White woman playing the authoritative role in their hierarchical role playing.

White males may sense they’re under attack, but many are unable to articulate their thoughts, or are afraid to voice support in defending their own race in fear of being labelled “racist“.

White people, especially White heterosexual males need to overcome their mind-numbing “political correct” ideologies and re-assert their role in this game before they’re replaced by fast approaching ethnic minorities who operate under the guise of supporting their own group interests in our diminishing White nations.

ALSO READ:

More Mass Media Manipulation

Kathleen Moore

IT IS NOT “RACIST” TO BE WHO YOU ARE

If we equate “racial diversity” with multiculturalism, and I think we must, it’s not good for Canada.

The first and biggest problem is that it is the OPPOSITE of our quasi-legislative FEDERALISM. What is that?

Well, had there been a “legislative” union of the British North American colonies in 1867, we would have ONE Parliament and no provincial Legislatures. Instead, we had a quasi-legislative union in 1867. Acting as a WHOLE nation in federal elections, we send one set of elected representatives to the Parliament to make law for Canada.

Acting as LOCAL peoples, each in our “reserved” territory, also called a “section” or a Province, we EACH send another set of elected representatives to our respective Legislatures.

UNION would not have been agreed to by the Founding Peoples in 1867 had it NOT been Federal, with a unique Legislature for each colony to maintain and advance its own interests, LOCALLY.

Confederation is therefore about LEGAL SEPARATISM under which each founding people was expected to have majority control of its territory, and thus of its culture and its laws, along with joint control of immigration with the central Parliament.

Multiculturalism is NOT CANADIAN federalism and it’s NOT a harbinger of legislative union, because it’s not about oneness, it’s a buckshot immigration policy which scatters hundreds of other races and cultures all across Canada, giving them priority over Canadians. Multiculturalism shoots holes into the national fabric of the federal nation, as well as into the local fabric of every “section” or province.

French Canadians recently took to the streets to PROTEST against multiculturalism and all of its ideological and structural underpinnings, including forced public and private indoctrination in the ideology of normative pluralism, represented in the video description below by the Religion and Ethics course:

The video uploader wrote this description in French (English translation below):

Marche contre la dénationalisation 2011 à Montréal.

Qu’est-ce que la dénationalisation ?

La dénationalisation se décrit par la tentative de négation et de remplacement de l’identité historique du peuple canadien-francais au Québec. Elle représente les politiques gouvernementales du multiculturalisme fédéral et de l’interculturalisme provincial, ainsi que les moyens utilisés pour mettre celles-ci en application. Entre autres, l’immigration massive, le cours d’Éthique et Culture Religieuse (ECR), la carence délibérée de cours d’histoire nationale dans nos écoles et le non-respect de la loi 101 sont des agents de la dénationalisation de notre peuple.

TRANSLATION:

March against de-nationalization in 2011 in Montreal.

What is de-nationalization?

De-nationalization is the attempt to negate and to replace the historic identity of the French Canadian people of Quebec. It represents the governmental policies of multiculturalism and provincial inter-culturalism, as well as the means employed to put these policies into application.

Amongst others, massive immigration, the public school course in “Ethics and Religious Culture” (ECR), the deliberate omission of a course in national history in our schools, and the non-respect of Law 101 [protecting the French language], which are agents of the de-nationalization of our (French Canadian) people.”

* * *

“De-nationalization”

Should we be concerned about French Canadians referring to themselves as a people, as a “nation” being denationalized? Isn’t it “separatism”? Not at all. IT’S CONFEDERATION. And here’s why. Official, LEGAL “separation” of the Founding Peoples under distinct Legislatures is what Confederation was about for ALL Founding Canadians. It gave us a country to share, as ONE political nation, and PROVINCES as our home turf to govern ourselves on our own terms, and preserve and develop our respective Founding (French & English) cultures and racial nations.

Although there are racial minorities in each Province, which is inevitable, the whole purpose of the Provincial Legislatures in 1867 was to give LOCAL INDEPENDENCE to each Founding People. This is more clear from a quote from 1867.

On the very first “Canada Day”, July 1st, 1867, Le Minerve, the newspaper mouthpiece of George Etienne Cartier, wrote as follows to describe the new Confederation: [TRANSLATION]

“Such is the meaning that must be attached to this Constitution. In it, we see the recognition of the French-Canadian nationality; we form a State within the State, with full enjoyment of our rights, and the formal recognition of our independence.”

Source: Studies on the Canadian Constitution and Canadian Federalism, The Constitution Act, 1867, the Confederation Debates and Provincial Autonomy. Claude Bélanger, Department of History, Marianopolis College – Last revised: 26 February 2001

These same LEGAL recognitions apply to ALL Founding Canadians and their natural heirs to whom Confederation belongs. We need to learn from our French-Canadian allies in Canada, who thankfully are not too politically correct, too intimidated, or too shy to take to the streets with their LOCAL FLAG which represents THEIR Founding People, and STAND UP FOR THEMSELVES.

As Canadians, we must also stand up for EACH OTHER and our true Constitutional Alliance, which in 1867 gave birth to CANADA, not to Africa, not to India, not to China, not to Cuba; but to a new FEDERATION, unique in the world, and the intended home “for all time to come” of its own unique and distinct Founding Peoples.

Kathleen Moore

HABEAS CORPUS CANADA
The Official Legal Challenge
To North American Union
http://www.habeascorpuscanada.com
Blog: http://canadian-state-of-the-union.blogspot.com

ALSO READ:

Hérouxville, Quebec

“Little Guy” Battles Political Correctness

************************************************

 Useful Idiots

What Is STATISM?

Political Correctness Run Amok

***********************

Canada Is Too Accommodating

Canada – Land of Pandering Fools

Canada Open To Immigrant Abuse 

Related articles

• Canadians Must Awaken Soon (elliotlakenews.wordpress.com)
• Government Disloyal To Own Citizens (elliotlakenews.wordpress.com)
• …and from FRANCE http://penserrendlibre.wordpress.com/

Kalispell, Montana, USA

[Editor's Note: The following snippet is taken from Pioneer Little Europe Blog located in Kalispell, Montana whose purpose is to draw attention to the concept of creating racially conscious White communities.]

Only Whites can NOT have a racial space of their own……..

[Read: "White Pride" DENIED Trademark

Though having been aware of this for some time, I've recently noticed that several media stories have surfaced showing how different ethnic groups are allowed to have their own living space, schools and so forth without ending up on the cover of the SPLC Intelligence Report.

In Toronto, Canada they approved of a Black focused public school that features a curriculum and teaching environment oriented around Black history and culture.

Now, I don't disagree with this approach. I believe in a racial soul that reflects the drastic differences in the art, music and religion of different peoples.

Black women are often the hardest hit by the multicultural, pro-race mixing agenda. Ever notice how often Black women straighten their naturally curly hair to have it appear to that of European women?

How angry it makes me that little Black girls only see Black women who have European features with straight hair as images of attractiveness in their race.

Young Black girls must also notice the overwhelming number of successful Black men who choose White blond women as their wives. I can't imagine how painful that is to a lovely dark-skinned, curly haired little Black girl. She grows up believing the only way she can attract the men of her own race is to try to appear less Black.

It seems that all racial groups, other than Whites, are encouraged and congratulated by the controlled media to have their ethnic identities protected. In New Jersey, school bus drivers are forced to work on Thanksgiving in order to accommodate the Orthodox Jewish students. I assumed that Thanksgiving Day was an American holiday for all Americans to celebrate and share on this festive day, but perhaps I was wrong.

Also, scholarships that are specifically race-related, and the lack of White or European civil rights classes in most high schools and colleges, may help you understand my point. We only want what other races are encouraged to have, our own place in this world where we can evolve as a race and a culture.  -Source

ALSO READ:

End of White America

WHITE Americans – An Endangered Species

**************

“Useful Idiots“

Canada’s Black Population

Is Burlington TOO White?

Cultural Death By Immigration (Canada)

*******************************************

Telling It Like It is!

The “Tolerance” Game

Related articles

• White Tribal Instincts (elliotlakenews.wordpress.com)
• “Reverse” Racism In AUSTRALIA (elliotlakenews.wordpress.com)
• Academic Cowardice In Race Debate (torontonews.wordpress.com)

Kathleen Moore

Europe’s Light is not merely dying, it is being snuffed out.

So is Canada’s Light, although we’re only now catching up. The natural peoples and races are being swept from their ancient territories by flood gates of so-called multiculturalism.

While we citizens struggle with this, like swimmers in the flood, disoriented and kicking about for a hand-hold as we belatedly realize we are going under, the politicians have always known they were going to do this to us.

Not long after the birth of Responsible Government in Canada, our London-based elites were already conspiring to overthrow it and recover their iron-fisted feudal hold on a society — that being so new to freedom — hardly knew how to use or keep it.

We are therefore losing our western democracies before they have been able to grow into “traditional” institutions.

As for the academics, they know what is happening. For them, there is no question, as there is for many of us who are still in denial as the Titanic ominously shifts her load.

I translated an article by one of those academics to give you a taste of what we are in for: (temporary url: http://christmasdreamthemes.com/home/audentes/public_html/comment-aire/?p=75)

DEMOCRATIC SOVEREIGNTY OR GLOBAL GOVERNANCE?

Translator’s Foreword

If you are at all concerned with the survival of democracy, representative and responsible government, and the continued existence of Canada as created in 1867 by its founding peoples, I think you will want to read this article which I translated this morning.

The original author, John Fonte, speaks of “post-democracy emerging from democracy”. I wonder if he just couldn’t spit out the word “totalitarianism”, which does not “emerge from” liberal democracy, it’s retrogressive; it is the reversal of civilization, and the end of individual rights and freedom.

– Kathleen Moore for HABEAS CORPUS CANADA

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

Exclusive English translation from the French original* is by Kathleen Moore for Habeas Corpus Canada:

Democratic Sovereignty or Global Governance?

August 23, 2004

by John Fonte

At its opening session in September, France will pass a law prohibiting the wearing of the Islamic veil and all other religious insignia at public schools.

My country, the United States of America, has complained of the discriminatory character of such a law. The French notion of “secularism” may not be compatible with the American notion of religious pluralism, but it is an integral part of the French national and democratic tradition, and is applied in the context of a democratic nation-state.

The principle of democratic sovereignty implies that the United States must not highhandedly oppose the internal policies of (other) nation-states. Thus, the American government should not have condemned the French law on secularism. In the same fashion, the French government must keep silent on the question of the death penalty in the United States.

This debate puts democratic sovereignty in question. The great ideological conflict of the 21st century will be between democratic sovereignty and global governance. The notion of democratic sovereignty implies that power resides in the liberal-democratic nation states where citizens elect representatives who are responsible to the voters. Citizens of the democratic nation-states are equal before the law and exercise full freedom of expression.

The notion of global governance implies that power resides in non-elected transnational institutions and in courts which escape the control of nationally elected governments. Equality of individuals is replaced by membership in a racial, ethnic, linguistic or religious sub-national and/or transnational group in which groups called “victims” (racial, ethnic, linguistic, sexual minorities, women, immigrants…) are endowed with special privileges which flout the principle of equality. Under transnational pressure, anti-racist laws forbidding “hate speech” weaken liberty of expression.

Unfortunately, the 21st century may well become a “post-democratic” century, a century in the course of which liberal democracy will be slowly, almost imperceptibly, replaced by a new form of global governance.

The ideology and the institutions of global governance already exist and are being rapidly developed. The philosophical foundation of global governance is based on the fact that all individuals on the planet are protected by human rights. International law is the supreme authority which determines these rights while international treaties establish and develop new laws and norms.

The international institutions (the United Nations and the World Bank, for example) control, negotiate and manage the international laws and treaties at various levels. Non-governmental international organizations (NGO’s) claim to represent “global civil society” or the “peoples” of the planet.

The regime of global governance is promoted and managed by interconnected transnational networks of elites composed of international lawyers and judges, activists of the NGO’s and of the United Nations, and other functionaries belonging to international organizations, the directors of international corporations and a number of supporters in the governments of the nation-states. The “progressive transnationals”, leftist Yuppies, and multinational corporations of the right are equally represented among these elites.

Contrary to democratic sovereignty, global governance does not offer direct responses to the fundamental questions of political science: Who governs? Where is the seat of authority? Who sanctions the legislation? The NGO’s that participate in drafting global treaties with democratic governments are essentially non-elected pressure groups, responsible to no one but themselves. The strength of the post-democracy is based in large part on its non-transparency.

By hiding the reasons and the manner in which political decisions are taken, these decisions become irreversible. For example, global governance does not give the “governed” any significant democratic means of rejecting the decisions they oppose, but which their new “masters” have nonetheless imposed upon them without their consent. And how can these “masters” be replaced? Global governance provides no democratic answer to these questions.

Global governance is implicitly a grand ideological scheme (and a Utopian project with universal ambitions). This system is post-democratic to the extent that it emerges from democracy but transcends it, in the same manner that “post-modernism” emerged from modernity but transcends it.

The European Union is the model for post-democratic governance. If there is one point on which both the friends and the enemies of the European Union agree, it is on subject of its “democratic deficit”. Many will admit that inside the [European] Union, the power is, to a great extent, exercised by non-elected transnational bureaucrats, and frequently contrary to the preferences of the national majorities.

Nonetheless, democracy may conquer post-democracy. The first step is to recognize the reality of the post-democratic threat. The United States, France and other democratic nation-states must undertake to promote the principle of democratic sovereignty inside the institutions of the liberal-democratic nation-state.

Democratic sovereignty is compatible with the morality of the Age of Enlightenment and the 18th-Century revolutions in France and The United States. It is compatible with the idea of “government with the consent of the governed” where state power is defined and circumscribed by a Constitution, which is the ultimate source of democratic legitimacy. To renounce democratic sovereignty without the consent of the people is not compatible with true democracy. In the end, anyone seriously concerned with democracy and the rights of man must have democratic sovereignty as their core value.

____________
* Historian John Fonte is the current Director of the American Common Culture and a researcher at the Hudson Institute in Washington DC. He has worked for the American Education Ministry on the development of standards (for teaching?) national history. This article is an extract from his essay, “Democracy’s Trojan Horse”, published in The National Interest in the summer of 2004. (This segment translated [into French] by the American, Dan Gorlin. Translated back into English by Kathleen Moore for Habeas Corpus Canada, 25-26 April 2011.)

This article appeared in the August 9, 2004, Le Figaro (Paris).

Here is a link to the FRENCH article which I have translated, above: “Souveraineté démocratique ou gouvernance globale?” – John Fonte: http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details&id=3447

John Fonte is a senior fellow and director of Hudson’s Center for American Common Culture.

Links for John Fonte:

John Fonte – Biographical note at Hudson Institute: http://www.hudson.org/learn/index.cfm?fuseaction=staff_bio&eid=fontjohn

Essay: “Democracy’s Trojan Horse” – http://nationalinterest.org/article/democracys-trojan-horse-1155

Essay: “Global Governance vs. the Liberal Democratic Nation-State: What Is the Best Regime?” – http://www.globalgovernancewatch.org/resources/global-governance-vs-the-liberal-democratic-nationstate-what-is-the-best-regime-2 (you can download a free PDF)

ALSO READ:

Diversity is NOT Strength 

Canadian Border Madness

More ANTI-White Practices 

****************************

How To Colonize Britain 

A Sense of Belonging 

Telling It Like It Is!

Related articles

• Illuminati Changes Name From”new World Order” to “Global” (powersthatbeat.wordpress.com)
• Sovereignty and globalisation – Council on Foreign Relations (mybetter4you.wordpress.com)

Here is a link to the FRENCH article which I have translated, above: “Souveraineté démocratique ou gouvernance globale?” – John Fonte: http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details

Image via Wikipedia

By Peter Stuyvesant

Until the 1970s there was NO significant NEGRO presence in Holland.

In the 1970s the first (immigrant) wave came from Surinam (South America), then in the 1980s the second wave from the Antilles (the Caribbean), and in the 1990s the third wave from Somalia (Africa). 

Since elites in the media and academic world never tire of saying that mass immigration is beneficial to the receiving country, it is good to put this thesis to the test using publicly available government sources and applying it to Negro migration.

In 2010 the research centre of Erasmus University of Rotterdam produced a report at the request of the Dutch government on the effects of public investment on the empowerment of (Black Caribbean) Antillean communities (141,000 immigrants) in Holland between 2005 and 2008.

[Read about: Holland, Michigan]

The local projects did not yield ANY positive results, and in some cases the situation was even worse than before any government intervention. The main problems are broken families, school dropout, unemployment, and criminality.

[...]

One of the consequences is that in 2008 there were 14 times (14X) more [Black] Antilleans in jail than native Dutch, if the figures are corrected to reflect their ratio of the population. The over-representation of the Antilleans in jail compared to their crime rate is mainly the result of the brutal violence that is a hallmark of (Black Caribbean) Antillean criminals.

SOMALI refugees don’t fare any better than their Black brethren from the Caribbean. The prospect of Somalis in Holland is so bleak that the integration report mentioned above tells us that the only “bright spot“  is that there are not so many of them!! (22,000 in ’09)

[ See: Shelbyville, TN & Somalis ]

[...]

Forty percent (40%) of Somali males aged 15–64 have no job and as a result they are registered as recipients of social welfare. The heavy reliance of broken families on social welfare is illustrated by the fact that 46% of Somali women rely on welfare.

[,,,]

Behavior, criminality and IQ

There has been a lot of investigation into the root causes of the failure of Negroid communities to achieve economic success.

[,,,]

The outcome was that more than half had an IQ of LESS than 85, indicating that their average IQ is below that of American Blacks (average 85 IQ) and implying that a substantial percentage are in the retarded range  (i.e., IQ < 70).

[...]

A glance at the world map with the average IQ per country indicates that this level of IQ is normal in among Blacks in the Caribbean, with average IQ’s ranging between 80 and 85, but significantly lower for Haiti, presumably because Haitians have relatively little admixture with Whites.

[...]

The groups are far more similar than different: both groups show the same Negroid culture of absent fathers, contempt for education, and a preference of criminality and idleness over work habits.

They are neither willing, nor able to make a contribution for the common welfare of Western countries. This should be a warning for advocates of Sub-Saharan (and Caribbean) immigration to America and Europe.  >to Full Report

ALSO READ:

Canada’s Black Population

AUSTRALIA Meets With Black Crime 

African Violence Comes To IRELAND

More African Refugees To Mid-America

********************************************

Blacks Less Intelligent?

More Fall-Out On Black IQ

Africa – World’s Begging Bowl

****************************

Crime & Race

Race, Crime & Media

News Omits Vital Facts

*************************

Importing Jamaican “Culture”

Black Culture Retarding White Kids

Canada’s Exploding BLACK Population (plus other minorities)

DATA FROM CANADIAN CENSUS ( 2011 figures are not yet available )

Canada’s greatest Black population INCREASE occurred between 1971 and 1991.

In 1971, only 34,400 Blacks resided in all of Canada. They were a mere 0.2 percent (or 1/5 of 1%) of our entire population, and most of them confined themselves to Toronto or Montreal. Our majority population was still about 98% White in that year. (Today in 2011, reduced to 81%)

Metro Toronto had a total population of 2.1 million in 1971 with a miniscule one-half of one percent (.5%) Black proportion in a city with a 97-98% White majority. (Today, Blacks have exploded to 8.5 percent of Toronto’s population, while the White proportion has been dramatically reduced to 53% in 2011.  Blacks are also vastly over-represented by huge margins in Toronto’s crime index figures, in our court systems, and in our prison populations.)

http://www.torontopolice.on.ca/homicide/mostwanted.php

By 2006 (35 yrs. later), and under the auspices of official multiculturalism, Canada’s Black population accelerated to an unprecedented 783,795 people which equates to over 2.2 percent of Canada’s population (23 times their numbers since 1971).

However, in more recent years, other NON-white groups have exceeded the Black numbers on a percentage basis (see short list below). These astounding increases of NON-whites [or visible minorities] are attributed to mass 3rd world IMMIGRATION into our country. This sudden policy switch from European-based sources to 3rd world countries happened without any viable explanation, nor with the consent of Canadians!

White Canadians were pre-empted before any protests could be mounted against this major racial transformation that was about to replace them.

“Hate laws” were set up just in time to thwart any opposition to this mass 3rd world immigration phenomenon, followed by “human rights” tribunals to punish opposing dissenters who disagreed with policies designed to displace them. “Political correctness“ was embedded into the psyche of Canadians, lest they utter forbidden statements unapproved by the state.  Anti-White employment equity policies were implemented in favour of visible-minorities in jobs and job promotions throughout our country, and at the expense more qualified White Canadians.

In fact, any notion of free speech has long since been removed from our everyday conversation except around one’s kitchen table and spoken only in hushed tones in today’s Canada. Essentially, Canadians are experiencing a White racial crisis, yet are forbidden to openly discuss the problem.

One could easily conclude of a conspiratorial attempt of genocide by this promotion of NON-whites into our traditional White country. But, we’re not alone in this practice, as European nations are also under the same relentless 3rd world immigrant assault, including the encouragement of miscegenation by their leaders.)

A small sampling of Canada’s expansion of (selected) NON-whites by percent between 2001-2006 (only 5 yrs.), with total numbers in brackets:

Latin American - 40.2%       ( 304,245 )
South Asian - 37.7%             ( 1,262,865 )
Filipino - 33.1%                      ( 410,695 )
Southeast-Asian - 20.6%  ( 239,935 )
Black - 18.4%                          ( 783,795 )
Chinese - 18.2%                     ( 1,216,570 )

(INCREASE IN BLACKS 1996 to 2006 was 36.6%)

So, what do these population numbers tell White Canadians about our future in our own country of just 34,000,000 people?

It simply says White Euro-Canadians are slowly being DISPLACED by exploding numbers of NON-white foreigners and their progenies!

From a historical perspective, it was our European forefathers who tilled the soil and farmed the land, mined the minerals, built roadways, railways, harvested huge tracts of forests. It was they, who later fought and died in European wars. And after each war,  it was they (military survivors) and their families who resumed their work activities by building our country and rapidly increasing our living standard immediately after WWII.

It was they, through blood, sweat and tears who laboured through long and difficult years to build a social welfare net designed to uplift themselves and their future generations.

Our social welfare plan was NOT intended to feed, clothe or shelter the world’s lying, cheating, and phony refugees who take advantage of our foolish generosity. Nor were our welfare agencies intended to provide undeserving foreigners with unearned, and perpetual monthly welfare cheques, nor free hospital care, nor free dental care at Canadian taxpayers’ expense. Many recent  foreign interlopers now live in conditions close to comfort zones usually reserved for ‘Royalty’ in their own 3rd world hell-holes.

So our gratitude rightfully belongs to our early English/French ancestors, and then followed by other European generations and their tax-paying progenies.

CANADA became a fully developed and modern 1st world nation long BEFORE all this unnecessary mass 3rd world immigration was imposed on us. In fact, today’s immigrants are a net drain on Canada’s “bottom line” that costs our country over $23,000,000,000 (billion) per year.

Visible minorities accounted for only 4.7% of Canada’s population in 1981.  By 1991 their numbers had DOUBLED to 9.4% of our population. Another ten years later in 2001, due to continued mass 3rd world immigration, their numbers had again stretched to 13.4%.

For the year 2011, visible minorities are expected to reach an unprecedented 19% of Canada’s population! Conversely, you find White Canadians rapidly DECLINING in population numbers.

[Proportion of Visible Minorities for ALL of CANADA, 1981-2001--Stats Canada] 

The unwarranted 5,000,000+ (five million immigrants!) who’ve entered our country in only the past 20 years, is the result of one of the greatest immigration deceptions ever perpetrated on Canadians.

Before WHITE Canadians are relegated to “visible-minority” status in their own country, the immigration doors must be slammed shut for the next two generations just to recover from this unprecedented betrayal of our own people, and,  in addition to saving $23 Billion every year.  Unfortunately, White identity politics is a form of “heresy” in today’s world, so it’s debatable whether this colour tide can ever be reversed.

ONE race, ONE culture, ONE Language, ONE people proudly singing their national song in Estonia.

Note: Audio stops during the last 30 seconds at 4:28, but feel free to play it over again… and again!

ALSO READ:

Happiest City In Canada

Is Burlington TOO White?

WHITE Males Need NOT Apply!

Canadian City Abhors “White Privilege”

Government Disloyal To Own Citizens

Canadians Duped On Multiculturalism

False Arguments Given For (“Needed”) Population Growth

************************************************************

“Useful Idiots”

How To Destroy A Nation 

WHITE Americans – An Endangered Species

**********************************************

…(almost) Everything You Wanted to Know About BLACKS But Was Afraid to Ask. 

Black School Principal Ousted From School 

Black Culture Retarding White Kids

Stuff BLACK People Don’t Like

1868 Description of Negroes

Black Racism

Thug Report 

*************

Crime & Race

Race, Crime & Media 

Blacks Less Intelligent?

More Fall-Out On Black IQ

****************************

“Racism” Is Not Sinful

The Right To Discriminate

Racial “Diversity” Is A Con Game

Multiculturalism – A Dividing Force

Is Racial Diversity Good For Canada?

ANTI-White Police Hiring

“Joys of Diversity”?? 

Sources:

Statistics Canada

http://goo.gl/6neSX

http://www.ualberta.ca/~jrkelly/blacksinCanada.pdf

Related articles

• More Anti-White Practices (elliotlakenews.wordpress.com)
• “Useful Idiots” (elliotlakenews.wordpress.com)
• Immigrants get fewer jobs, earn less (cbc.ca)
• Canada to Revoke Citizenship to Vincentians (repeatingislands.com)