… from NineNews, Justice Betty King says there have been numerous examples of African refugees coming before the (Australian) courts for offences linked to excessive consumption of alcohol.
Economic Refugee from Sudan
She says many young Africans appear to be spending their days drinking (alcohol) because they have nothing to do, and are seemingly dispossessed.
[ELN Editor's Note:Of course, they are "seemingly dispossessed" because these 3rd world illiterates are wholly incompatible to living with White Europeans. They inevitably suffer from the "envy complex" which they can never achieve, so they begin stewing in a cauldron of hatred which eventually boils over, and is unleashed against their White benefactors.
For example, the violent behaviour patterns seen in this video, and perpetrated against ordinary Australians gathered together for a festive occasion, would never have happened had they been WHITE South African refugees. Instead, we have the usual Blackforeign thugs wreaking uncontrolled havoc on taxpaying citizens who help feed and clothe these incongruent invaders.
The TV series “Star Trek” is noted for having a very wise and sensible “Prime Directive” inserted in their script that states:
“As the right of each sentient species to live in accordance with its normal cultural evolution is considered sacred, no Star Fleet personnel may interfere with the healthy development of alien life and culture. Such interference includes the introduction of superior knowledge, strength, or technology to a world whose society is incapable of handling such advantages wisely.
Star Fleet personnel may not violate this Prime Directive, even to save their lives and/or their ship unless they are acting to right an earlier violation or an accidental contamination of said culture. This directive takes precedence over any and all other considerations, and carries with it the highest moral obligation.”
The “contamination” taking place in our own White western cultures — is by no means, accidental. On the contrary… it’s a policy with deliberate intent. Editor]
Justice King said Boronika Gam Hothnyang, 25, not only wasted the life of William Awu when she stabbed him to death, but also wasted her own life.
Both Hothnyang and Mr Awu, 26, had fled war-torn Sudan hoping for a better life in Australia.
[Are you fed-up of having to read, ad nauseam, this journalistic drivel of "hoping for a better life" nonsense? There are over 7,000,000,000 (billion) people who occupy this planet today, yet it seems the 8% White proportion are always obligated to taking care of the ungrateful "others" whose ratio exceeds our own by 12 to 1 . ... ELN Editor]
Hothnyang stabbed Mr Awu, who was her friend, once in the chest as he sat passed out in a chair at her Dandenong home. [LOL! Australia has very strict gun laws, but knives are readily available---ed]
Justice King described the crime as inexplicable, but noted Mr Awu, a talented drawer, had earlier sketched Hothnyang in a caricature in which she was overweight.
The judge said the murder was a tragic waste of life that was all too common.
“It is a disturbing matter to note that you and the persons with whom you were gathered, including the deceased, are not the first, second, third or even fourth of similar groups of Sudanese or other African refugees that have come before the courts on serious charges which can be directly linked to the consumption of large quantities of alcohol,” Justice King said.
“All of this is such a sad reflection on our society that we have groups of seemingly dispossessed men and women who have been brought here as refugees with little or nothing to do except drink their days away.”
More illiterate, 65 IQ Sudanese refugees being prepared to re-locate to AUSTRALIA!?
As is to be expected … NO mention of where they get the money to get drunk while they are doing nothing — the Australian taxpayer.
And, for their welcoming deed in this woman’s case, the murderer has 3 kids that will surely now be taken care of by—you guessed it!—the Australian taxpayer, as she (the murderer) does time in the slammer.
For more on the problems Australia is having with refugees, asylum seekers and illegal aliens visit our Australia category with its 93 previous posts. >Source: Refugee Settlement Watch
During the great fratricidal wars that smashed Europe withthe optimistic belief in unswerving human progress during the early part of the 20th century, a parallel conflict tore Australia asunder. It comprised of the two fiercely-fought campaigns that preceded referenda on conscription.
Flag of AUSTRALIA
A factor that wove through these political battles, and arguably proved to be the clincher for the “NO” camp, was the fear of NON-white labour would be needed to fill the vacuum created by shipping reluctant Australians off to the European slaughterhouses.
A further horror filling Australian minds, was that of the miscegenation that would be brought in to train NON-white labour forces. This would be — according to the thinking of the day — nothing less than an offence against nature itself. These were fears that the opponents of conscription, including Ben Chifley, the man who would become one of Australia’s few truly legendary prime ministers, and who had not the least qualms in exploiting.
Ben Chifley
The population was then 98%White. Australia was also unashamedly, unapologetically, and by today’s perverted standards … damnably ‘racist’.
How did the Australia of those days become the Australia of today — which to Australians of the early 20th century would no doubt see a monstrous, nightmare world, which if it could be glimpsed then – be understood in terms of an armed invasion and a conquest that would have been resisted to the last bullet?
A reasonable answer would be one provided by some historians in their explanation for the collapse of civilizations. This theory sees such collapses preceded by the collapse in the value system of the hapless society. Inextricably connected to its value system is a people’s belief in itself, which, once proud and implicit, becomes eroded to the point of despair and nihilism. This phenomenon can be most graphically seen in the fate of indigenous people whom history’s trajectory has brought into head-on collision with technologically advanced civilizations.
The difference between the collapse of previous civilizations, and the teetering structure of modern Western (White) civilization, is that the latter is fueled by a collective death-wish. After reaching undreamed pinnacles of modernity while uplifting the rest of the world with it, the White race now flagellates itself for its very success. This susceptibility appears to be a peculiarly White characteristic, linked no doubt, to the universal altruism inherent in Christianity, which for two thousand years, monopolized the spiritual life of the West.
No other race exhibits this fatal flaw. It also appears that no other race has any qualms in benefiting from the exploitation of this fatal flaw. The thinking would go something like this: If indeed the White race is intent on sacrificing itself on the altar of brotherly love, who are we to object? If Western man cannot be prevented from poisoning himself with White guilt over his perceived sins against the rest of humanity, might we not strengthen the poison in order shorten the suffering and hasten his end?
Whereas the chosen weapons of “mass self-destruction” in Europe and the U.S. are, respectively, Islamisation and Mestizo reconquista while Australia has opted for ‘Asianisation’.
This process was once relegated to the realm of conspiracy theory; only “nutters and crack-pots” could possibly believe that such a thing could be happening. But as the racial transformation became self-evident on the streets of our major cities, and with the overflow siphoned off to our country towns, the social engineers with their god-complexes, could no longer keep their evil secret. ‘Australia is changing. We’re an anomaly as a European country in this part of the world. There’s already a large and growing Asian population in Australia and it is inevitable, in my view, that Australia will become a Eurasian country… I happen to think that’s desirable.’ So said Bill Hayden as Australian Foreign Minster in 1983.
But even with the emperor now seen to be wearing no clothes and mocking the Australian people for their gullibility, the racial transformers had little to fear. Their faith in the efficacy of Fabian gradualism was well placed. There is a little understood, but self-evident component of human nature that allows just about any crime to be perpetrated against people just as long as it’s done slowly and accompanied by constant assurances that it is being done for the victim’s own good.
It seems to matter little, that before it was done, the most emphatic promises were made that it wouldn’t be done.
At least since the 1850s when the Chinese swarmed in seeking our gold, the collective Australian psyche has been plagued by a fear of the swarming hordes to our north. It was little wonder then, that a ripple of unease spread throughout the country upon the arrival of the first ‘boat people’ fleeing Vietnam in 1975. This reaction, we were instantly informed, was little more than to be expected from a nation of entrenched insularity and xenophobia. It was thought “the height of embarrassing, girlish silliness”. What could be so threatening about a few leaky boats and their pitiful human cargoes? There may even be more of them. But given we were part of the team responsible for raining death and destruction on their country, did we not have a moral responsibility to offer refuge to those fleeing the wreckage?
As more and more boats arrived, our fears were similarly assuaged in the fashion of a parent soothing an upset infant. Those who thought they may have been witnessing a thin edge of a wedge, were dealt with in a slightly sterner manner.
Asian immigration, — it was proclaimed — would never be more than a “thin trickle“; it was negligible and it would be a sheer impossibility for it to have the slightest effect on the racial make-up of the nation. So there! Get over it!
It goes without saying — that such blatant lying could not have blinded almost an entire population to what they were seeing with their own eyes in the years to come — without the aid of some fearfully powerful instruments of persuasion in the form of the mass media: TV, Radio, Newspaper and film, bolstered, of course, by the indoctrination that had subsumed the various levels of formal education. This was propagandizing raised to the level of a reality constructed to the specifications of those with most to gain.
Not only was acceptance of the Australian people’s replacement by alien races being manufactured, but so was the complacency surrounding the shipping off of the jobs not already taken by foreign workers to the lands they had just come from. Although this culminated in a virtual de-industrialization, the Australian people were naturally told that this also was for their “own good”. Generally speaking, they were not to know of something called the Lima Agreement that bound the country to a siphoning off of its wealth. It was signed in 1975 by an Australian government enthusiastically supported by the so called “Opposition parties” and said in part:
‘developed countries should assist the developing countries in raising the competitiveness of their production . . . they should adopt . . . elimination or reduction of tariff barriers in order to ensure increased exports of manufactured and semi-manufactured products . . . from developing countries ….
‘Special attention should be given to the least developed countries, which should enjoy a net transfer of resources from the developed countries in the form of technical and financial resources as well as capital goods’.
If the Australian people had been paying close attention to these goings on, they may have noted an odd contradiction. After decades of being lectured to on the evils of Communism, here was Communism being ratcheted up several orders of magnitude far greater than anything KarlMarx could ever have dreamt of. Instead of individuals or social classes having their wealth redistributed to the needier, here were entire nations involved in the redistribution. “From each according to his ability and to each according to his need” … indeed.
The process of unrelenting dispossession was not perfectly smooth. If perfect smoothness was — in fact — in the interests of those channeling history; perhaps the odd ruffle may have added a dab of paint to the fading image of ‘democracy’, and the odd ruffle was there.
Usually erupting and then slowly disappearing like pimples, one ‘pimple’ proved a little more difficult to remove. This was the outburst of nationalist resentment unwittingly given rise to by an amateur politician named Pauline Hanson. Largely a creation of the media after her star-quality newsworthiness was realized, this shooting star’s trajectory became so steep that the liberal establishment, and assorted hangers-on, were shaken out of their smug complacency by a social earth-tremor. When all else had failed: ridicule, vilification, character-assassination was employed, and the problem solved by Pauline being jailed, and becoming, in fact, a political prisoner.
Like a cattle prod to keep the human cattle in line, the charge of ‘racism’ showed no sign of losing its almost magical potency. Racism had become the cardinal sin of the United Nation’s endorsed religion, and rapidly superceded Christianity. ”Racism” had become expertly linked with ‘Hate’, the first emotion to be effectively outlawed. If ‘Hate‘ could in any way be seen as the motive for a crime, the “crime” was then deemed far more heinous than the same crime committed for a different motive.
Australians, like other members of the White family in far flung corners of the world, had been taught that their race was really the only one capable of the crimes of “racism and hate”. There were isolated instances of other races straying into these forbidden areas, but they were such an anomaly, as to require a different term, that of reverse racism. This cemented in place the concept of White ”racism” being the original sin.
Australians moreover, after being thoroughly drenched in guilt regarding their ‘invasion’ of the (primitive) continent on which they had constructed a modern civilization, and the ‘genocide’ of the original inhabitants, are then encouraged to reflect on the hurt they had inflicted on the people they had once thought of as the ‘yellow peril’. There was of course only one way to atone for this, and that was to reverse the thinking that had informed ‘White Australia’ by opening the flood gates, thereby creating a “Yellow” Australia.
This also could be seen as an act of appeasement, as an Asian invasion was a historical inevitability just biding its time. Better to pre-empt the inevitable, and hope to gain kinder terms of surrender. This logic could easily be seen as a variation of the thinking made famous during the Vietnam War: ‘we had to destroy the village in order to save it’.
Being amongst the inventors of racism, it perhaps does not occur to many Australians, that the people we have slighted so long, could be capable of harbouring similar dark thoughts by themselves. These innocents would benefit hugely from a perusal of The Asian Mind Game by Chin-ning Chu, an international lecturer and expert on Asian psychology. She writes:
‘To some racially-sensitivewestern readers, discussions of the characteristics of separate ethnic and national groups might seem to border on “racism”. The Asian concept of racism is very different than the western concept. Concepts of racial superiority have never been questioned as they have been in the West. There are strong feelings among the Chinese, Japanese and Koreans on the subject of racial superiority even though the peoples are very closely related from an evolutionary standpoint. The idea that one people is racially superior to another is almost universally acknowledged. Whether that race is Chinese, Korean or Japanese depends on whether you’re listening to a Chinese, Korean or Japanese person expound his views on the subject.
‘Asians do not have the same sensitivity to racial issues as do Americans [or Australians]. The issue is not as emotionally charged for them. Asians regard it as natural to feel that their race, their nation … are better than yours.
Westerners exhibit most of these same attitudes and refer to them in mildly pejorative terms as “chauvinistic”, “nationalistic”, “provincial”. But “racist” is a very ugly word in English, even though it often only expresses the same common weakness of mankind to believe that mine is better than yours.’
‘Asians do not feel guilty about thinking in racial terms, but they do understand that westerners … do. They will often use accusations of racism to disarm their Western opponents. The same Japanese politicians who loudly impute racist motives to American criticism of Japan believe implicitly that they are racially superior to Caucasians, and also to their Korean and Chinese neighbours. They will never admit these beliefs to a Westerner, but among Asians, thinking in racial terms is too commonplace to bother with denial or guilt.’ [Italics mine]
It would seem that Australians, along with the rest of the European racial family have been patiently indoctrinated into a state of what psychiatrists term ‘cognitive dissonance’. This happens when two conflicting ideas are retained in the mind at the same time with the resulting frustration being kept largely below the level of consciousness.
Australians could not be unaware that people of other races exhibit racist tendencies, but are yet led to believe that these are so inconsequential as to be non existent. By the same token, Whites have been hypnotized into believing that multi-racialism/multiculturalism will lead to “paradise” on Earth, but seldom do they wonder why only White homelands are the only recipients of such “wondrous” gifts. Here is another glaring contradiction that rarely sees the light of consciousness: If, it seems Whites are considered worthy of the multicultural experiment because they alone have attained a higher moral standard — is this not paradoxically the height of true racism and arrogance?
Such questions often float over the heads of Australians like puffy and unnoticed clouds on a balmy summer’s day. Citizens of the ‘Lucky Country’ tramp obediently off to polling booths at regular intervals blithely unaware that the stooges they vote into power are simply branch managers of the New World Order.
Voters cannot conceive of their country’s sovereignty being all but leached away by the signing of an untold number of international treaties and agreements. They watch, for example, politicians from Team A and Team B pretending to argue over immigration policy when control was long ago ceded by both teams via the signing of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination which is effectively interpreted to mean that Whites need not apply.
White Australian
And so — as blissfully ignorant as cattle being herded towards the gates of the slaughter-house, Australians continue to watch mind-rotting television — dress like clowns in the colours of their preferred football teams — read the news selected for them by newspaper owners — and thrill to the antics of celebrities, while their own birthrights and heritage are quietly slipped out from under them — it seems that only a miracle can save them. >Source
Results from the2011 Australian Census reveal that — for the first time in that nation’s history — the majority of migrants are now arriving from Asia instead of Europe. Indians and Chinese have become the fastest growing sections of the Australian population.
2011 Australian census
Between 2006 and 2011 the number of Australian (P.R.) permanent residents born in Indiaincreased by100%, those born in Chinaincreased by54%, while those born in the Philippinesincreased by42%. These startling figures do NOT include the off-spring of Indian/Chinese parentages born in Australia.
The Census also revealed that other NON-White immigrant groups are also expanding rapidly, including various Africangroups.
[What is the percentage [%] of the world’s NON-white population? ANSWER]
All of this… is dismal news for White Australians and, indeed, for White people everywhere. Unfortunately, these figures only mirror what is happening throughout the
In just a few decades… these malignant policies have transformed Western societies to the detriment of their European-derived populations and culture. It is a remarkable fact that this revolution in immigration, and social policy throughout the West, occurred at around the same time (1962-1973), and that in all countries these changes reflected the attitude of elites… rather than the great mass of citizens.
Changes in immigration policy and the imposition of multiculturalism were imposed on resentful European populations despite overwhelming popular opposition to NON-European immigration.
The driving force behind this totally undemocratic shift in policy was the Jewish intellectual movements and ethno-political activism that Kevin MacDonald documented in The Culture of Critique. For those aware of the pivotal role of Jews in driving the demographic and cultural transformation of the United States, the story of the Jewish role in radically re-engineering Australian society… will have a depressingly familiar ring to it.
(Below are excerpts from Part 4 of 5 parts) H/T to Incogman.net
Australian Jewry, now just one ethnic group among many in a “multicultural” society, remains, as Rubinstein observes, “one of the best organised Diaspora communities in the world and is frequently at the forefront of ethnic and multicultural affairs in Australia.”[i] The one-time editorial committee member of the Australian Jewish Democrat, Miriam Faine, got right to the heart of the Jewish support for large-scale NON-white immigration and multiculturalism when she noted that:
“The strengthening of multicultural or diverse Australia is also our most effective insurance policy against anti-Semitism. The day Australia has a Chinese Australian Governor General I would be more confident of my freedom to live as a Jewish Australian.”[ii]
Comments like these make it clear that the Jewish promotion of NON-white immigration and multiculturalism has been first and foremost, a form or ethnic strategizing (or White Genocide) concerned with preventing the development of a mass movement of so-called “anti-Semitism” in Australia, and other Western societies.
[...]
Pauline Hanson
The first genuine challenge to the politically-correct consensus (of bipartisan support for non-racially discriminatory immigration and multiculturalism) was the emergence of Pauline Hanson and her One Nation Party in the 1990s. Hanson was unexpectedly elected as the member for the previously safe Labor electorate of Oxley in the state of Queensland in 1996. In her maiden speech to parliament she launched a strong attack on official multicultural policies, stating that:
Immigration and multiculturalism are issues that this government is trying to address, but for far too long ordinary Australians have been kept out of any debate by the major parties. I and most Australians want our immigration policy radically reviewed and that of multiculturalism abolished. I believe we are in danger of being swamped by Asians. Between 1984 and 1995, 40% of all migrants coming into this country were of Asian origin. They have their own culture and religion, form ghettos and do not assimilate. Of course, I will be called ‘racist‘, but if I can invite whom I want into my home, then I should have the right to have a say in who comes into my country.
A truly multicultural country can never be strong or united. The world is full of failed and tragic examples, ranging from Ireland to Bosnia to Africa and, closer to home, Papua New Guinea. America and Great Britain are currently paying the price. Arthur Calwell was a great Australian and Labor leader, and it is a pity that there are not men of his stature sitting on the opposition benches today. Arthur Calwell said: Japan, India, Burma, Ceylon and every new African nation are fiercely anti-White and anti one another. Do we want or need any of these people here? I am one red-blooded Australian who says no, and who speaks for 90% of Australians. I have no hesitation in echoing the words of Arthur Calwell.
Her speech created a nation-wide sensation. Despite frantic efforts to paint her as an “evil racist”, her electoral popularity soared. The subsequent formation of Pauline Hanson’s One Nation Party swiftly led to success in the June 1998 Queensland election.
As in the United States, individuals and groups who challenge the politically correct consensus of open door immigration and multiculturalism in Australia are “regularly monitored by the Jewish media and the B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation Commission” – the Australian equivalent of the ADL.[vii] In an effort to shame and intimidate Hanson’s supporters, the B’nai B’rith obtained a list of the 2000 people associated with the One Nation Party and had it published in the Australia/Israel Review under the headline “Gotcha! One Nation’s Secret Membership List.”[viii] In keeping with the tactics of organized Jewry throughout the Western world, the attempt by Hanson and her supporters to ensure that White Australia retained demographic, political and cultural control of Australia was represented as “racist, immoral, and indicative of psychiatric disorder”. >>Original Source for all 5 parts.
By definition, refugees are people who claim persecution, leave their home country (where the “persecution” occurred) and seek asylum in a safe country. They are not supposed to use “safe countries” as hopping off places for a better deal somewhere else, and that is what is happening with increased frequency worldwide. (Search ‘Malta’ here at RRW to learn more about how that came to be.)
Nothing steams me more than the fact that, we, and other western countries are now taking Black AFRICAN “refugees” from South Africa who claim that the Rainbow Nationis “not safe” for them. Yet, heaven help the truly persecuted Whites in South Africa.
I’ve written many posts over the years trying to expose the Rainbow Nation multicultural nirvana myth, but it seems that no one in the media is willing to face the reality of what the Rainbow Nation is! Here is how wikipediadescribes the term “Rainbow Nation“. What a joke!
Rainbow Nation is a term coined by Archbishop Desmond Tutu to describe post-apartheid South Africa, after South Africa’s first fully democratic election in 1994.
The phrase was elaborated upon by President Nelson Mandela in his first month of office, when he proclaimed: “Each of us is as intimately attached to the soil of this beautiful country as are the famous jacaranda trees of Pretoria and the mimosa trees of the bushveld – a rainbow nation at peace with itself and the world.”
The term was intended to encapsulate the unity of multi-culturalism and the coming-together of people of many different nations, in a country once identified with the strict division of white and black.
Surprise! Tribalism is alive and well in South Africa, and diversity does not bring strength!
Here is the story that caught my attention about Australia (and other western countries) taking “refugees” from South Africa. It begins and ends with the story of Congolese “asylum seekers” who have lived in South Africa for a decade (five of those years have been spent trying to get out).
After five years of hoping and waiting, Marie*, her husband Simeon* and their three children, refugees from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, finally received a phone call telling them to pack their bags as they would be leaving South Africa for Australia at the end of the month.
Simeon was unconcerned by the short notice. “We’ve been ready for so long,” he told IRIN from the UN Refugee Agency’s (UNHCR) offices in Pretoria, where the family had just found out the name of the (Australian) city they would be restarting their lives in. “Brisbane,” said Marie, testing the word on her lips for the first time. “Do you know where that is?”
The xenophobic violence that South Africa is experiencing is not coming from the White population, but in many cases, is leveled at White (citizens) as well as black African “foreigners.” Of course, news reports never make that clear. They can’t bring themselves to say that the Blacks of Nelson Mandela’s supposedly victimized South Africa are now persecuting other (Blacks)!
Until a wave of xenophobic violence against foreigners erupted in South Africa in 2008, the country was considered fairly progressive in its treatment of refugees and asylum seekers, and as having little need for resettlement. Since that time, most of the cases that UNHCR refers for resettlement are victims of continued xenophobic attacks, many of them Somalis attempting to run businesses in low-income (South African) areas where their presence is viewed as a threat by local traders.
The Congolese family was rejected by the US and Canada before being “welcomed” by Australia (see previous postabout Australia increasing its refugee numbers). The UN went shopping for a country which would take them.
For a refugee desperate to escape an intolerable situation and make a fresh start, the process can feel endless, particularly if it concludes with a rejection. Dermegerditchian said more than 90% of the cases that UNHCR submits for resettlement in the southern Africa region are accepted, but Marie and her family were rejected by both the US and Canada before Australia agreed to take them.
Marie is convinced that they were rejected because two of their children suffer from haemophilia, a genetic disorder that impairs the body’s ability to control bleeding, but Dermegerditchian was reluctant to speculate. “Resettlement countries have their own criteria; they only inform us of the reasons for denial in general terms,” he said. “In some cases UNHCR needs to reinterview the refugee to make sure their stories are consistent. If we can’t find a problem, we resubmit their case to another country.”
After years of joblessness, denial of medical treatment for their children, and what they describe as “constant xenophobia” from their neighbours, Marie and Simeon’s relief to be leaving their home of the past decade is palpable. “The fact that they’re welcoming us [in Australia] – it frees you psychologically,” said Simeon. >Source
THE social unrest experienced during the Cronulla riots could be replicated in the Melbourne suburbs due to high levels of crime among Sudanese and Somali-born residents, police have warned.
A Somali man
(African) Sudanese and Somali-born Victorians (residents of the State of Victoria, AUS) are about five times (500%) more likely to commit crimes, official figures show, with assault and robbery the most common offences illustrating a trend of increasingly violent robberies by disaffected African youths. [Not "disaffected", but entirely incompatible with White Australians - Editor]
”We’ve got to fix this now and make sure it doesn’t continue, so the kids who are now 10 years old aren’t in this offender bracket in five years’ time. So we don’t get the Cronullas happening,” the Victoria Police Deputy Commissioner, Tim Cartwright, said. ”[At Cronulla] you had a big chunk of the community disengaged and coming to a point where you have large-scale civil unrest. That’s abhorrent to us, to think we would have that.
”You look at the UK riots and you think ‘we don’t ever want to go there, we don’t ever want to see segments of our community saying they just don’t care what the rest of the community does.’ In the longer term, the challenge for us is to fix that.”
[Too late, Deputy! It's a proven fact throughout every White western nation where incompatible Black Africans are allowed entry, their crime rates will inevitability soar... as expected by reasoning observers -- ELN Editor]
The police statistics show that the rate of offending among the Victorian Sudanese community is 7109 (crimes) per 100,000, while for Somali people it is 6141 per 100,000.
The figure for the wider community is 1301 per 100,000.
The overall proportion of crimes statewide committed by the Sudanese and Somali communities is only 0.92 per cent and 0.35 per cent and people arrested and charged may falsely identify themselves as being from those communities.
For Sudanese and Somalis, assault offences are the most common type, constituting 29.5% and 24.3% of ALL offences.
[“Experience, practically everywhere in the world, tells us that an expanding BLACK population is a sure-fire recipe for increases in crime, violence and a wide range of other social problems” -- Professor Andrew Fraser WARNED us all in 2005]
[There were good reasons in maintaining Australia's White immigration policies. Common sense dictates that MULTI-racialism destabilizes homogenous societies to the degree of what we see happening every day in our White European-based nations. Only the thoroughly brainwashed, ultra-liberal dupes would say otherwise and cry "racism" in defense of their warped thinking. Another example of this debasing immigrant/refugee "invasion" taking shape... is SWEDEN with its 9 million people. -ELN Editor]
”Property is one of the issues, so they’re stealing iPhones, or money, or things of value,” Mr Cartwright said.
”But there’s also a concerning trend of violence, violence that’s not needed. So, once they’ve got the property, the violence continues (after the robbery). Maybe there’s a thrill in it, maybe a bit of revenge, but it’s coming out of a lot of groups, not just the Africans.” >Source
I am a White man – and I have realised that I am constantly judged for that by other White-skinned people who have a problem with the fact that I am proud to be a White man.
Let me repeat that first sentence – “I am a White man.”
Does that make you feel a little uncomfortable if you are also a White man? What if I said, “I am a White guy”, instead? Sound more acceptable to you – a bit more friendly? Have you ever wondered why? If you are a White man/guy, do you feel the colour of your skin, or do you just feel normal? Why have we been made to feel guilty because we are White?
[The world population is 7,000,000,000.What is the percentage (%) of WHITE people on Earth?ANSWER.]
Me? I just feel normal and don’t think about the colour of my skin until I realise that I am being judged for being a ‘White Man.” But like I said, I am proud to be a White Man, although I have given some thought to why that appellation makes me feel momentarily uncomfortable.
So what if you are not a White man? Maybe you are a not actually a Black man – just not a White man – a NON-white? Does that appellation make you feel a bit angry – with “White Men?” They can’t be held responsible that you are not White. Does this have some sort of deeper meaning for you? You need to ask yourself… why? I imagine that what I am going to write about here will make both Black and White people feel uncomfortable, that is, unless they have given this issue a bit of thought, and are comfortable with who you are.
This goes particularly for the White Guys who have been indoctrinated to feel some misguided guilt about being a who and what we are – “White Men.”
But it’s not my actual skin colour that I am proud of, because it tends to be a bit blotchy pink, and let me say here, that I am definitely not ashamed of it – either practically or metaphorically – but it is my culture that I’m proud of.
You may call it “White Culture,” and that’s fine with me. In fact, I am much more conditioned by my culture than my skin colour. My culture is so complex that it is not really understood by many of my compatriots – let alone NON-white people.
I have heard well-educated people say that we don’t have a culture. How incredibly stupid of them. Let me say here again, that I am very proud of it and I believe it is the most advanced and the most important culture on planet earth. For example – to compare Polynesian culture to “White Culture” is to compare the space shuttle to a dugout canoe. It is this global culture that would be first to communicate with extraterrestrials – if they exist.
My culture is many things, but I consider it global – the most advanced ever – and the only culture that can save humanity from its own stupidity.
I am a New Zealander, and here in New Zealand they have this dream of being able to boast of a “different,” a “Polynesian,” a “Pacific” culture. But the sad fact is, that this – also called “Kiwi” culture — can only exist as part of the Global Western European (White) Culture.
That global culture gives my “Kiwi” culture all the things that it needs to function, to think about itself and “grow.” It has some Polynesian input but that is entirely superficial. This will always cause difficulty for the Political Correct liberals because they really, really want to shrug this off and pretend that the membership in the global, and therefore “White” culture is less important, and that their Maori/Polynesian dimension supersedes it.
In their heart of hearts, they know every moment that they are completely wrong because the Polynesian culture died 150 years ago, and all that is left of it is superficial nonsense, which is actually acceptable to those PC liberals. Much of Polynesian culture is absolutely unacceptable to them and their “White” culture has expunged those things from both memory and in some cases history.
An illustration of that, is that part of that Polynesian culture included cannibalism and infanticide and incest, all bound up with constant murderous attacks on rival tribes, all of which is absolutely anathema to the liberals who nevertheless vehemently support concepts of bi-culturalism and multiculturalism. The global “White” culture has unequivocally banned many of the cultural practices of the Polynesians, and rightly so. They were uncivilised. Now there is a basic confusion right there. They know this is true and this truth really upsets them.
So what about my “Global” culture? Well I was born in the south Pacific to a White European family that has been in these parts for 4 generations, but I still identify with the cultures of the “White” nations of Europe, and I have to say, not even slightly with stone-age Polynesian cultures.
The idea of multiculturalism has spread like a miasma, and to people like me, it is a cultural disaster for the human race and is developing into an impending catastrophe.
The thing about my culture that is also important, is that I don’t necessarily believe that one needs to be White to be part of it – but one does need to realise that it is – actually – White – and came directly out of White ingenuity, creativity, resourcefulness, originality, and inventiveness.
I believe that the basic problem existing between “Whites” and NON-whites” is that all races realise in their heart of hearts that “White” civilisation is not only a superior culture, it is unlikely to be superseded in achievement by any other earthly race or culture.
To be a true part of it, one needs to be educated and civilised and most of all – secular. One can still have religion, but the religion must really be a private matter. As soon as one’s religious belief becomes something that requires the wearing of regalia, the making of laws, and the imposition of it on others, then its adherents fall outside the Western Global Culture. It should be recognised by all, that “White” culture was born in Europe, migrated to the North America, Australia and New Zealand.
ONE People, ONE Culture, ONE Race, and ONE Language united in their national song, can be a powerful experience as seen in this video.
Note: The audio ceases during the last 30 seconds at 4:28
Out of White culture – my culture – came the disciplines of law, arts, finance, engineering, science, mass transport, exploration – and tolerance of other cultures. That makes it the most important on the planet, and as it happens – the one culture that most people want to belong to and emigrate to. But more important is the White attitude to learning, education, progress and humanity.
Emerging out of Global White Western Culture is a level of learning and education and moral ethos that engendered tolerance. But tolerance, like many other things in life, needs to be tempered with moderation. It is the human condition, that when met with too much tolerance for bad behaviour, you will become cynical towards those who offer you excessive tolerance and your behaviour towards them will become difficult and bad. You will display contempt for the fact that they are apparently too weak.
In our modern global society we have become so tolerant that we are actually tolerant of the intolerance of others – of people who are invadingour place on this planet and ruining it.
At the same time, we have become (as a society) intolerant of those of our own culture, and who express misgivings about this, and the damage it does to our society, our people and the future of humanity. They call us “White Supremacists” – and they never let a good debate replace a nasty name.
Some among us can see down the path of time and can accurately predict what the outcome will be. Disaster! It is very clear to me, and has been for four decades that multiculturalism was going to have a bad, bad outcome.
In 2011, the leaders of Germany, France, Belgium, Holland, Denmark and Switzerland have all come out and condemned multiculturalism, as not just a failure, but anabject failure, a disaster that is going to have grave repercussions in the coming years.
The human race is doomed to a disaster of global proportions that will make the Second World War seem like a walk in the park. We can only hope for the sake of humanity, that the so-called “White” people can survive – because they will be the only ones who might rebuild civilisation. -Source
“The goal of abolishing the white race, is, on its face so desirable, that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists. Make no mistake about it, we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed–not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.” – JEWISH studies professor, Dr Noel Ignatiev
WHITE (Australian) students are fleeing public schools, leaving behind those of Aboriginal and Middle Eastern origin, a secret report by high school principals reveals.
The NSW (New South Wales) Secondary Principals Council conducted a confidential survey which raises serious concerns about “white flight” undermining the public education system and threatening social cohesion. Some teachers and principals have described it as “de facto apartheid”.
The findings are backed by research from the University of Western Sydney, which has identified evidence of racial conflict in schools in the wake of the Cronulla riots. It also suggests students of Anglo-European descent are avoiding some schools with students of mainly Asian background.
Not only have some public schools lost enrolment; they have become racially segregated. In pockets of rural and remote NSW, Aboriginal students fill public schools and white students attend Catholic and other private schools in the same town.
Around Sydney, the parents of some Anglo-European students are avoiding what they perceive as predominantly Lebanese, Muslim and Asian schools.
In New England, in towns such as Armidale, white middle-class students are flocking to Catholic and independent schools.
In their report, principals say this is so the students can “get away from their local school”.
“This is almost certainly white flight from towns in which the public school’s enrolment consists increasingly of indigenous students,” the report says. “The pattern is repeated in the Sydney region. Based on comments from principals, this most likely consists of flight to avoid Islamic students and communities.” >to Full Article
The brutal bashing of a young (White) man at Sunshine train station in Melbourne (Australia) (sign-in video here) has highlighted the problems of crime associated with the immigration of large numbers of BLACK Africansinto Australia. [1]
Professor Andrew Fraser WARNED us all in 2005 about these dangers, when he said:
“Experience, practically everywhere in the world, tells us that an expanding BLACK population is a sure-fire recipe for increases in crime, violence and a wide range of other social problems” [2].
Fraser was persecuted by the so-called “Human Rights” industry for telling the truth.
[...]
Whilst every society, ethnic group and race all have a percentage of people that commit violent crimes, research shows us that this percentage is significantly higher amongst Black African males; to be quite clear, this does not mean that all of them are violent criminals, but that – compared to the general population – a higher percentage of Black African males are more likely to commit crimes of violence. This is a fact, as shown by crime statistics in countries such as Australia, England and the USA. [3]
U.S. Pop. – Black Americans 12.5% Vs White Americans 63%
[Black Males (14 to 49 yrs.) account for 3% of the U.S. population but commit 52% of ALL murders!]
Newspaper reports in Australia have confirmed the higher crime ratesof Black Africans. For instance, the Herald Sun revealed that whilst the general rate of alleged crimes was 1 in 85… the rate for SOMALIANS was 1 in 23.
Political multiculturalists may offer all sorts of excuses as to why the Black African crime rate is so much higher, blaming poverty, war trauma, etc., but the fact remains that their crime rate is indeed higher. [4]
This is not a matter of faceless “statistics”, but of real people suffering as victims of crime – it is about real people being hurt, disabled and killed. These higher crime “statistics” could mean your brother is bashed, your sister is raped, or your friend is murdered. Higher crime rates are about real people.
Perth, Australia – RacistBlack Africans Attack White Australian
If we can choose between bringing in compatible immigrants with a European background and low crime rate, or incompatible African people (mostly asylum seekers) with a high crime rate….. who wouldchoose the high crime option??
The fact is that political multi-culturalists are extremists. They would rather have thousands of more Australians being bashed, raped or murdered rather than admit their mistake, and halt the immigration of BLACK AFRICANS!
Who is to blame? It’s the politicians and multiculturalists who are the problem. It is high time that we dumped the extremist ideologies of political multiculturalism and political correctness. It’s time that we started to protect Australians – and protect our nation’s future. -Source
White Australian Policies worked well until “The Tribe” interfered.
A scene from Australia’s past BEFORE the multi-racial invasion from 3rd world countries
United Nations, Human Rights Charter, Article 19 states: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”
[Most people] “confuse the dreary recitation of politically correct gibberish with sensitivity that they think they have arrived at through their own value clarification”. –Tomislav Sunic
"Rather than love, than money, than fame, give me TRUTH." — Henry David Thoreau
"Happiness is not the goal of existence, but the byproduct of a life well lived and the purpose of life is TRUTH... not pleasure".
"For most people, the desire not to deviate too far from the herd, prevents them from telling the truth they really feel inside. What would the neighbors think?" -- John Kaminski
Current Weather
~~~~~ ELLIOT LAKE NEWS & VIEWS is a Blog helping to slay the many-headed dragon of "political correctness" with the effective weapon called TRUTH.
Subjects pertaining to mass 3rd-world immigration, multi-culturalism and racial identity are are given special priorities here, and from which material you may either accept or reject at your personal discretion.
Opinions are accepted without ad hominem attacks or insults. Personal responses to any commentary or questions will be kept to a bare minimum due to time constraints.
Miscellaneous
> All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed.
Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer
German philosopher (1788 -1860)
The truth that makes men free is for the most part the truth which men prefer not to hear.
“In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” -Orwell
To get the oil price, please enable Javascript.
![[Most Recent Charts from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_usoz_4.gif)
