Sovietizing Western Nations

By Sarah, Maid of Albion

Bernard Hogan-Howe, the newly appointed state apparatchik in charge of the London Metropolitan

Labour Conference Police Protection

police assures us, that “racists” will be “driven out of the police” whilst revealing that 10 officers are currently under investigation of suspicion of the most “heinous” thought crime of our age.

Last week, writing in the London Evening Standard, former deputy editor of the Independent and sometime speech writer for Prime Minister David Cameron, Ian Birrell snarled that “racist” policemen should be “rooted out”, “prosecuted” and “lose their precious pensions”.

Indeed, Mr Birrell addressed his subject which such furious, staring-eyed zealotry, that one suspects only fear of exposure prevented him from adding that they be transported to some gulag in a remote part of Wales, or the Scottish highlands for forced re-education and recreational rock-breaking.

Meanwhile, a young man still languishes in prison for the offence ofsending an ideologically-incorrect tweet, whilst the one-time captain of the England soccer team, John Terry awaits prosecution for allegedly calling a black footballer “black”, and Terry has already been stripped of his captaincy, showing when it comes to “racism”, an accusation alone is deemed grounds for punishment, whether guilty or not.

Elsewhere, a young mother (Emma West) is out on bail after some informer turned her in via the internet when she expressed an objection to the forced invasion of her homeland.

We are regaled with shocking accounts of racially “insensitive” words, thoughts and deeds. Nightly, earnest young reporters appear on our televisions, and usually standing outside courts, police stations or football fields reporting on some politically incorrect quip as if it were equivalent to the napalm bombing of a hospice.   (Which they probably think of its equivalency.)

Across the Atlantic Ocean in America, news channels such as CNN, or “we are Treyvon” as they have probably re-branded themselves by now, have taken to reporting an almost Lewis Carroll-style alternative reality where a man’s colour and ethnicity can be changed at the will of a metanarrative (For example Hispanics and Cherokee Indians can suddenly morph into “evil” White men just to suit an agenda).

Meanwhile alleged “victims” are transformed into angelic twelve year old versions of themselves. All this parallel universe chicanery is performed in an effort to “root out” the very same legendary (White) “racists” who are being hunted down by Commissioner Hogan-Howe and Ian Birrell here (in England).

At the same time hugely popular writers and commentators such Pat Buchananor John Derbyshire, who dare to speak truths which must not be spoken, are summarily dismissed, pilloried and have their livelihoods destroyed.

Of course, we have seen this all before in other times and in other places (U.S.S.R.) where ideological offenders and “thought criminals” were subjected to show trials and highly publicised prosecutions, and then called “enemies of the state“.

Now they are held up as evil, hate-fuelled “enemies of the multicultural fantasy” which has become the obsession of the state.

Now, as then, “thought criminals” must be purged from our institutions and positions of trust, then broken, punished and forced to confess and beg a forgiveness, which is seldom, if ever granted.

Now, as then, victims are judged to be offenders and punished for the crimes committed against them.

Now, just like then, fake realities are created to act both as parables of the new (state) religion, and as truncheons, with which the state can batter its terrorised population into acquiescence.

Just as then, we are required to pay lip service to an orthodoxy which we do not agree with, which frightens us, and which we know to be flawed, and only dare speak our true thoughts to our most trusted friends in hushed tones and in private.

As happened then, abject failures held together only by state terrorism are presented by an obedient and craven state media as glorious “successes”, which fool only those who wish to be fooled, but which few, if any, dare challenge.

What we are seeing, in effect is the Sovietisation of the West.

The Sovietisation of the United Kingdom was the subject with Dr Frank Ellis, then a lecturer at Leeds University, before the university attempted, but failed to purge him for expressing his disobedient views addressed in 2001 following the release of that most Stalinist and Orwellian of documents, The Macpherson report into the murder of Stephen Lawrence.

In his outstanding analysis of the report, Frank Ellis exposed the agenda driven fanaticism and false reality which influenced the Macpherson inquiry and its recommendations. and detailed how its purported attempts to combat racism, were in reality an outright, and so far, successful attack on the existing British society, its native people and our culture.

As Frank Ellis says:

“The near unanimous acceptance of its [the report's] assumptions and conclusions by the Labour government represents a major victory for those who are striving to undermine long-established British institutions and accomplish the final destruction of the United Kingdom “

When explaining the process of Sovietisation, of which the Macpherson report is part, Dr Ellis describes the fate of the Kulaks, the middle-class Russian peasants who Stalin sought to exterminate, and who, as a result, died in their millions.

On reading this, I then suggested that we, the White race, were being set up as the Kulaks of the 21st Century, and Frank told me that Jared Taylor of American Renaissance had also reached that exact same conclusion.

I leave it to you… to make your own assessment.

Now eleven years on, it is quite striking how relevant Frank’s analysis of the Macpherson report remains today, and how many of Frank’s predictions have come to pass.

Frank’s review of this poisonous document is a very important and valuable resource, which I urge you all to re-read and which I hope Nationalist bloggers will link to.

Because of this, I have given it pride of place, as the first article I have added to a new site which I have set up for Frank’s writings, linked below:

The Macpherson Report: “Anti-Racism” Hysteria and the Sovietization  the United Kingdom by Dr Frank Ellis

>Source

Telling It Like It Is!

The following excerpts are taken from an open letter written to Prime Minister David Cameron of Great Britain concerning the crucial question of mass 3rd-world immigration and its negative effects on the indigenous British people and their homeland. However, this letter could have been addressed to any “leader” of a White western country, and yet, still maintained the integrity of the message. It’s recommended that you read the full letter HERE.

From Dr. Frank Ellis

Dear Mr Cameron:

Once again, I am compelled to write to you on the subject of immigration and the related ills which are gnawing away at the fabric of British society and destroying us. Having read your speech, I can say that there are parts which show some awareness of the immigration threat, for example, the connection with the welfare state. Whether of course you act is another matter.

The long-suffering, white indigenous population has heard the cry of “It’s time to get tough on immigration” so many times before, and on each occasion, nothing has happened. Once any election is out of the way the immigration assault on our way life continues its relentless path. Nothing is done to stop the invasion. Whole neighbourhoods are taken over by immigrants and we whites are supposed to pretend that we are being blessed, when in fact we are being dispossessed.

[...]

The reason that ‘immigration is a hugely emotive subject’ is because any attempt to criticize mass immigration has been portrayed by the political caste to which you belong, the BBC, the Guardian-reading classes, the universities, and what is erroneously referred to as the “teaching profession”, as something too dreadful even to contemplate.

The implicit, often quite explicit assumption, has been that any person who criticizes the level of immigration, or who resents the changes that have been imposed on Britain without the consent of the indigenous population, is some kind of Nazi, hell bent on mass murder. Those of us who have attacked the insane levels of immigration have not just made assertions: we have offered compelling arguments to which the BBC, to take just one example, has responded with hysteria and vitriol.

[...]

The filters of BBC censorship and of other monopoly stream media outlets through which anything to do with race, multiculturalism, immigration and crimes carried out by immigrants must pass before anything is broadcast or put in print mean that the grim truth is never fully placed in the public domain or only hinted at, as for example when the BBC reports violent black behaviour in London.

Strangely, Britons were rejecting multi-racialism as far back as1958, and still do today!!

Ever since 1948, immigration has been an issue in Britain, punctuated by race riots and culminating in the Islamic terrorist attacks of Thursday 7th July 2005. Successive governments have tried to ram race-is-a fiction, we-are-the-world and multiculturalism down our throats, and when we have retched and vomited this poison out of our bodies, politicians have then resorted to legal and administrative sanctions against us; they have indoctrinated our children to hate their country, its heroes, its past; they have turned children against their parents; they preach hatred of whites; they encourage immigrants to mock us and to take over our towns, cities and neighbourhoods; and our (soldiers) returning from Iraq and Afghanistan are spat at and reviled by immigrants as war criminals.

[...]

As for what you call ‘good immigration’ you claim – politicians always do – that ‘Our country has benefitted immeasurably from immigration’… That is news to me.

When I go through large parts of Britain – Bradford, Slough, Leicester, Birmingham, Leeds and whole swathes of London – I am assailed by sights and sounds that might be appropriate in the Third-World but do not belong in England. Third-World immigrants recreate theThird World in First-World countries.

When I go to large parts of England I do not wish to see masses of black and brown faces, bizarre clothing, hordes of immigrant children, freakish behaviour, to hear the invasive cacophony of non-European languages and to see whole streets that look as if they belong in Islamabad or Mogadishu. I do not feel enriched by “diversity” or multiculturalism.

[...]

The real problem is the mass influx of poorly or dubiously qualified or unqualified Indians, Pakistanis, sub-Saharan Africans, Somalis and Turks and others, whose sole contribution is to overpopulate Britain and whose customs, religion and high levels of welfare dependency represent a massive drain on the public purse.

When one takes into account the social, economic and displacement costs borne by the white indigenous population and the huge emotional and psychological stress inflicted on whites by the presence of large numbers of non-white aliens in their country, there are no substantial benefits at all from mass immigration, especially from India, Pakistan, Sub-Saharan Africa, Somalia and the Middle East. Mass, non-white immigration is a curse.

[...]

What are (staff) people from Uganda, India and Pakistan doing in large numbers in British hospitals? Britain is quite capable of providing enough staff from the indigenous population. Our training is superior as well. The countries you mention are not exactly known for high standards and good training.

The Indian examination system is corrupt and riddled with cheating such that fake degrees and other professional qualifications are easily obtainable at the right price. Pakistan is a Third World slum whose sole export to this country has been terrorism, welfare parasitism and immigrant invaders. Uganda is a sub-Saharan, third-world basket case. Do you really expect me to believe that any training such as it is in Uganda meets First World standards, and that lives are not being put at risk by employing Africans?

[...]

For how much longer are you and Trevor Phillips going to tell us that more time is needed so that integration can work, or should I say, be made to work, at the expense of the white, indigenous population? Integration can never work because most of us have a healthy and wholesome sense of who we are and what we cannot be or become. The natural resistance we manifest frustrates the ambition of the diversophiles, so harsh and repressive legislation must be enacted so that opposition can be bullied and intimidated into silence.

[...]

You want openness. Here it is: I do not want to live in a community where I am confronted with hordes of black and brown faces on the streets of our towns and cities; I do not want to socialise with non-white immigrants; if by mistake I walked into a pub full of non-whites, I would leave immediately; I do not want to have to work with these people if it can be avoided; I avoid non-white immigrants at every possible opportunity (if dealing with them is unavoidable, I am polite no more no less); I do not want my children to have to endure the presence of huge numbers of non-white immigrants in their schools; I do not want to be preached to by diversity propagandists, telling me against all the evidence and the screams of my soul that diversity is some kind of blessing (it is nothing of the sort).

JAPAN Prefers Racial Homogeneity

JAPAN Simply Rejects Mass Immigration

Diversity is bestial, hateful and loathsome: it is a psychological weapon of war which has been deployed against the white peoples of the world in order to undermine their natural sense of racial and cultural separation, their identity, their natural and proper sense of superiority across the entire spectrum of human endeavour. Diversity is a collectivist (Culture Marxist) refuge for the failure, the loser, the envious and the nation hater-killers.

God bless England, Ireland (both sides of the border), Scotland and Wales.

Yours sincerely, Frank Ellis       -Source

ALSO READ:

How To Colonise Britain

So, This Is England 2009?

How Britain Destroyed Itself

Immigrants Flooding Into Britain

By Andrew Green

Just occasionally a series of events crystallises public opinion and transforms the political landscape. That is what has happened with immigration in the past fortnight. Three events stand out.

The crucial wake-up call was publication of the government’s latest population forecasts. They were truly shocking. They showed that, if immigration continues at the level the government now assumes, the population of the UK will grow by more than 10,000,000 people in the next 25 years – that is equivalent to 10 cities the size of Birmingham; 70% of the increase will be due to immigration.

The public were taken aback by these numbers. They are now beginning to realise that we face the most critical decision for a generation. Not since the referendum on the Common Market in the 1970s have we confronted a decision that will so greatly affect the lives of our children and grandchildren. Do we set about a massive building programme, constructing a virtual Birmingham every 2½ years and do we accept the fundamental changes to our society that will flow from immigration on this scale? Or do we take action now to cut immigration sharply?

Image via Wikipedia

Next was David Cameron’s (photo) decision to speak about immigration for the first time in two years. His speech on Monday called for a “grown-up” debate, set out the dilemma in measured terms and outlined Conservative proposals for both an annual limit to immigration and, importantly, a substantial reduction in numbers.

He clearly struck a chord. It was not long before we had Labour and Conservatives competing to sound tough on immigration – an extraordinary transformation from the days when people hardly dared mention the topic for fear of being accused of “racism“.

The third event – if such it be – was the farcical episode when the government’s count of the new jobs taken by foreigners changed three times in a day, ending up roughly double where it began. The outcome was another blow to confidence in the government’s ability to manage immigration.

The genie is now well and truly out of the bottle. Public opinion is extremely strong – 80% disbelieve the government’s honesty and competence; 75% want to see an annual limit; two-thirds fear that our culture is under threat. Only one in three believe that immigration brings economic benefit to Britain.

The immigration lobby claims there is little that the government can do. It is all down to some mysterious force called “globalisation”. They are wrong. In fact, immigration to the UK took off in 1997. The prime cause was a series of policy errors by the present government. First, it abolished such border controls as it inherited. Then it trebled the number of work permits to 150,000 a year, plus dependents. Finally, it hopelessly miscalculated the inflow of east Europeans.

These policies can and should be reversed. The government could use its much-vaunted “points-based system” to throttle back sharply on work permits. The Australians, who have such a system, set a ceiling on immigration. So should we. >>MORE

ALSO READ:

Revving Engine Is RACIST

Police Drug Enforcement Is RACIST

“Institutional Racism” In Britain

RACISM – The New Witchcraft Hysteria

………………….and More “Racism” Hysteria

Britain’s Reverse Racism

“Common Purpose” Is To Brainwash

Britain’s Immigration Fiasco

Vanishing England

The Great Escape From Britain

Related articles

• (MONITOR) Damian Green says Britain has become addicted to importing immigrants rather than training domestic workers #immigration (dreadnoughtuk.wordpress.com)