A once stable, homogeneous nation, … now gone forever!
Circa Late 1950s
A once stable, homogeneous nation, … now gone forever!
Circa Late 1950s
Former Canadian prime minister, Pierre Trudeau was conveniently “placed” in office by Lester B. Pearson, whose Soviet activities are mentioned in this link:
I also recently put online a 1971 piece by Alan Stang, and which I feel is extremely credible:
Paul Hellyer, who founded the Canadian Action Party (CAP), was Pearson’s right-hand man, and was also close to Trudeau. It would be naive to think that two Communists like Pearson and Trudeau would entrust Canada’s national security to a man who was not also on their Communist team.
[Related: Canadian Politics - A Charade
Paul Hellyer is now chasing “aliens” and demanding that we earth people “partner” with aliens to advance technologically. His political party, the CAP, was led for many years by Connie Fogal Rankin who was hand-picked by Hellyer, and a Communist. Together with her husband, devout Stalinist Harry Rankin — who lied under oath to become a lawyer — ran Vancouver’s only Communist municipal party.
When Harry died in 2002, Connie hired a choir to sing at his funeral. The choir sang the Communist anthem, the “International”, not our national anthem of “O Canada”. Of course, the International is a reference to Communist globalism also known as world government.
Connie’s work leading Hellyer’s party has been chiefly directed towards deflecting Canadians away from any viable opposition to North American Union — the annexation of Canada to the USA and Mexico in a Communist regional union, and a step towards a Communist world government.
They appear to be copying the successful scam of Commissar Trudeau, who:
[a] worked underground to stir up “radical” Quebec separatism;
[b] worked with one of the two FLQ terrorist leaders, Pierre Vallieres, who was a Director of Trudeau’s magazine, CITE LIBRE (Free City);
[c] worked underground with other Quebec Cabinet ministers in Soviet Pearson’s federal government to devise a plan requiring the creation of a “separatist” party, so it could be “fought” in a battle to “save” Canada.
That party was indeed created and led by Trudeau’s friend Rene Levesque — who was raised a Communist by his father.
The party is the PARTI QUEBECOIS, and Rene Levesque followed Trudeau’s lead and command every step of the way to the 1980 referendum… a communist ploy to destroy Canada by imposing on all of Canada the system then unfolding in Europe, which was then the European Economic Community, and today has become the European Union.
A number of credible individuals are warning us that the EU is the new Soviet Union. See Vladimir Bukovsky, Charlotte Iserbyt and the late Vilius Brazenas, to name just three.
The North American Union is modeled on the European Union and is thus to be the North American Soviet Union, which explains why Hellyer’s fake party to “save” Canada is trying to get a “referendum” on it to introduce a “yes” option which the constitution forbids as treason.
Meanwhile, Hellyer’s best pal is a former U.S. military man who psychically channels aliens; and the executive team behind Hellyer’s party is led by a president who teaches the URANTIA Book religion — a faith based on a book written in the 30s by an infamous member of the Kellogg family — which teaches that earth requires world government and must be federated into a galactic society composed of planets full of aliens who also each have world government. I’ve made fun of Hellyer and his Communist crowd of numb-nuts here:
Communists and Theocratic Globalists want to “save Canada”: http://canadiansovietactionparty.50webs.com (best viewed in Internet Explorer for the animated aliens).
“Soviet” supporting documents for that spoof site are here:
http://northamericansovietunion.blogspot.com, including a link to the newspaper article on the “International” being sung at Rankin’s funeral.
For more on Trudeau and our illegal referendums, read my 2008 newsletter, and my blog:
HABEAS CORPUS CANADA
The Official Legal Challenge
To North American Union
Europe’s Light is not merely dying, it is being snuffed out.
While we citizens struggle with this, like swimmers in the flood, disoriented and kicking about for a hand-hold as we belatedly realize we are going under, the politicians have always known they were going to do this to us.
Not long after the birth of Responsible Government in Canada, our London-based elites were already conspiring to overthrow it and recover their iron-fisted feudal hold on a society — that being so new to freedom — hardly knew how to use or keep it.
We are therefore losing our western democracies before they have been able to grow into “traditional” institutions.
As for the academics, they know what is happening. For them, there is no question, as there is for many of us who are still in denial as the Titanic ominously shifts her load.
I translated an article by one of those academics to give you a taste of what we are in for: (temporary url: http://christmasdreamthemes.com/home/audentes/public_html/comment-aire/?p=75)
DEMOCRATIC SOVEREIGNTY OR GLOBAL GOVERNANCE?
If you are at all concerned with the survival of democracy, representative and responsible government, and the continued existence of Canada as created in 1867 by its founding peoples, I think you will want to read this article which I translated this morning.
The original author, John Fonte, speaks of “post-democracy emerging from democracy”. I wonder if he just couldn’t spit out the word “totalitarianism”, which does not “emerge from” liberal democracy, it’s retrogressive; it is the reversal of civilization, and the end of individual rights and freedom.
– Kathleen Moore for HABEAS CORPUS CANADA
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Exclusive English translation from the French original* is by Kathleen Moore for Habeas Corpus Canada:
Democratic Sovereignty or Global Governance?
August 23, 2004
by John Fonte
At its opening session in September, France will pass a law prohibiting the wearing of the Islamic veil and all other religious insignia at public schools.
My country, the United States of America, has complained of the discriminatory character of such a law. The French notion of “secularism” may not be compatible with the American notion of religious pluralism, but it is an integral part of the French national and democratic tradition, and is applied in the context of a democratic nation-state.
The principle of democratic sovereignty implies that the United States must not highhandedly oppose the internal policies of (other) nation-states. Thus, the American government should not have condemned the French law on secularism. In the same fashion, the French government must keep silent on the question of the death penalty in the United States.
This debate puts democratic sovereignty in question. The great ideological conflict of the 21st century will be between democratic sovereignty and global governance. The notion of democratic sovereignty implies that power resides in the liberal-democratic nation states where citizens elect representatives who are responsible to the voters. Citizens of the democratic nation-states are equal before the law and exercise full freedom of expression.
The notion of global governance implies that power resides in non-elected transnational institutions and in courts which escape the control of nationally elected governments. Equality of individuals is replaced by membership in a racial, ethnic, linguistic or religious sub-national and/or transnational group in which groups called “victims” (racial, ethnic, linguistic, sexual minorities, women, immigrants…) are endowed with special privileges which flout the principle of equality. Under transnational pressure, anti-racist laws forbidding “hate speech” weaken liberty of expression.
Unfortunately, the 21st century may well become a “post-democratic” century, a century in the course of which liberal democracy will be slowly, almost imperceptibly, replaced by a new form of global governance.
The ideology and the institutions of global governance already exist and are being rapidly developed. The philosophical foundation of global governance is based on the fact that all individuals on the planet are protected by human rights. International law is the supreme authority which determines these rights while international treaties establish and develop new laws and norms.
The international institutions (the United Nations and the World Bank, for example) control, negotiate and manage the international laws and treaties at various levels. Non-governmental international organizations (NGO’s) claim to represent “global civil society” or the “peoples” of the planet.
The regime of global governance is promoted and managed by interconnected transnational networks of elites composed of international lawyers and judges, activists of the NGO’s and of the United Nations, and other functionaries belonging to international organizations, the directors of international corporations and a number of supporters in the governments of the nation-states. The “progressive transnationals”, leftist Yuppies, and multinational corporations of the right are equally represented among these elites.
Contrary to democratic sovereignty, global governance does not offer direct responses to the fundamental questions of political science: Who governs? Where is the seat of authority? Who sanctions the legislation? The NGO’s that participate in drafting global treaties with democratic governments are essentially non-elected pressure groups, responsible to no one but themselves. The strength of the post-democracy is based in large part on its non-transparency.
By hiding the reasons and the manner in which political decisions are taken, these decisions become irreversible. For example, global governance does not give the “governed” any significant democratic means of rejecting the decisions they oppose, but which their new “masters” have nonetheless imposed upon them without their consent. And how can these “masters” be replaced? Global governance provides no democratic answer to these questions.
Global governance is implicitly a grand ideological scheme (and a Utopian project with universal ambitions). This system is post-democratic to the extent that it emerges from democracy but transcends it, in the same manner that “post-modernism” emerged from modernity but transcends it.
The European Union is the model for post-democratic governance. If there is one point on which both the friends and the enemies of the European Union agree, it is on subject of its “democratic deficit”. Many will admit that inside the [European] Union, the power is, to a great extent, exercised by non-elected transnational bureaucrats, and frequently contrary to the preferences of the national majorities.
Nonetheless, democracy may conquer post-democracy. The first step is to recognize the reality of the post-democratic threat. The United States, France and other democratic nation-states must undertake to promote the principle of democratic sovereignty inside the institutions of the liberal-democratic nation-state.
Democratic sovereignty is compatible with the morality of the Age of Enlightenment and the 18th-Century revolutions in France and The United States. It is compatible with the idea of “government with the consent of the governed” where state power is defined and circumscribed by a Constitution, which is the ultimate source of democratic legitimacy. To renounce democratic sovereignty without the consent of the people is not compatible with true democracy. In the end, anyone seriously concerned with democracy and the rights of man must have democratic sovereignty as their core value.
* Historian John Fonte is the current Director of the American Common Culture and a researcher at the Hudson Institute in Washington DC. He has worked for the American Education Ministry on the development of standards (for teaching?) national history. This article is an extract from his essay, “Democracy’s Trojan Horse”, published in The National Interest in the summer of 2004. (This segment translated [into French] by the American, Dan Gorlin. Translated back into English by Kathleen Moore for Habeas Corpus Canada, 25-26 April 2011.)
This article appeared in the August 9, 2004, Le Figaro (Paris).
Here is a link to the FRENCH article which I have translated, above: “Souveraineté démocratique ou gouvernance globale?” – John Fonte: http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details&id=3447
John Fonte is a senior fellow and director of Hudson’s Center for American Common Culture.
Links for John Fonte:
John Fonte – Biographical note at Hudson Institute: http://www.hudson.org/learn/index.cfm?fuseaction=staff_bio&eid=fontjohn
Essay: “Democracy’s Trojan Horse” – http://nationalinterest.org/article/democracys-trojan-horse-1155
Essay: “Global Governance vs. the Liberal Democratic Nation-State: What Is the Best Regime?” – http://www.globalgovernancewatch.org/resources/global-governance-vs-the-liberal-democratic-nationstate-what-is-the-best-regime-2 (you can download a free PDF)
Here is a link to the FRENCH article which I have translated, above: “Souveraineté démocratique ou gouvernance globale?” – John Fonte: http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details
By Mister Fox
The dominant ideology in Western nations is built around multi-racialism or anti-racism, and is a variant of Nazism. The motive is to push “Whites” out of their own communities, and it is done by deceit, and against democratic principles or rule of law.
More than 50 million (50,000,000) AFRICAN workers are being brought to EUROPE in a SECRET immigration agreement.
[What’s the percentage (%) of WHITE people on Earth? Answer.]
This is the most evil plan against humanity hatched in Europe, since the Nazis herded Jewish people into the gas chambers, and the Soviets starved 5 million Kulaks, and is likewise, meant to destroy a people: the whole of western Europe and her people and has been implemented by the evil E.U.
This ideology is totalitarian with only one viewpoint allowed. It is very intolerant of any complaint about the cruelty and injustice of it and brands dissidents as “haters”, “bigots, “fascists” or “Nazis” which de-humanises the victims, and, so the authorities can harass and push Whites out without any conscience because we are all “racists”.
A “job centre” funded by money misappropriated from (British) tax-payers has been opened in Mali, and was the beginning of “free movement of people in Africa and the EU (Europe)”.
EU economists claim Britain and other EU states will “need” 56 million (56,000,000!) immigrant workers between them, by 2050, to make up for the “demographic decline” due to falling birth rates and rising death rates across Europe. This is the betrayal of British people whose jobs are being sent abroad, and whose children are facing unjust competition from imported labour.
Moreover, if we were not transferring billions of pounds in aid to elites in the Third World, and billions more as UK subscriptions to the UN and the EU, we might well be able to give our own people a better pension. which are due to be cut.
The Portugal Declaration urges the EU (European Union) to assist African governments in setting up migration information centres “to better manage labour mobility between Africa and the EU”.
The first job centre was opened in Bamako, capital of Mali, on Monday the 6th of October. More centers are to open soon in other west African states… then in north Africa.
These immigrant African people are prepared for immigration with clothes and language lessons by The British Council.
African lawyer Dele Oguntimojou wrote:
“(you) do not know how the youth in the poor African village is being seduced by lush advertising to shed his native dress for blue jeans; to re-tune his ears from the traditional hi-life to the drum and bass of hip-hop and Brit pop. Even now the British Council is busy across Africa training the next generation of immigrants in the language of the destination country.”(2)
There was an expose` in November 2006 that the (British) Government was advertising for immigrants in a Foreign Office pamphlet distributed from Embassies around the world.
‘Multicultural Britain – A Land Of Immigrants’ encourages immigrants to come here because of the Human Rights Act which gives them privileges (over British natives) and well-paid jobs. Illustrated with photos of smiling NON-whites, it is an invitation to people to immigrate here. (3)
Racial Awareness Training is a method of brainwashing that local councils send their employers, employees and decision makers on to be conditioned in correct thinking: “to challenge individual prejudices and values and change them”. It stemmed from the ideas of the American Judith Katz who held that “racism is inherent in whites”.
The police are being turned into a race-gestapo. Judge Mapherson began his investigation into the murder of Stephen Lawrence prejudiced against the police. With his mind already made up, he used British law as social engineering to mould the police into an anti-racist, thought-police.
They (already) knew what their conclusion was going to be — and the idea was not to ascertain the facts of a case — but to reach the right conclusion. This further made our law totalitarian: Recommendation 12 states, “A racist incident is any incident, which is perceived to be racist by the victim, or any other person“.
Recommendation 13 adds, “That the term ‘racist incident’ must be understood to include crimes and non-crimes in policing terms. Both must be investigated with equal commitment”. So, now we can be investigated for committing a “NON-crime”.
The labeling of dissidents as “racists”, “bigots”, “haters” etc., is de-humanisation and setting us up for persecution for not conforming to establishment diktats. It is pure totalitarian thinking straight from Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union: if anybody speaks out against being dispossessed, then they are persecuted by the state. [...]
“I hate White people”
By Mister Fox
This is not a titillating novel, nor a light read, but a serious attempt to uncover European civilisation and replace it with Islam. I have put in lots of links because I want others to research this too, and I hope, write up what they find.schemes to destroy our
There were a series of secretive European Union-agreements with ten European and North African Countries. It is a series of meetings from The Barcelona Agreement to the Euro Mediterranean Declaration of 1995. The following is an abstract with links so readers can check my sources and I hope pursue their own research and writing.
The Euro Mediterranean Declaration was agreed by the EU, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan, the Palestinian Authority, Syria, Lebanon, Turkey and Israel ……..
Multiculturalism is to be respected in order to promote tolerance between different ethnic groups in society. The importance of a resolute common campaign against racism, xenophobia and intolerance is emphasized. This was predicted by Vladimir Bukovsky from secret documents he filmed in The (Communist Russian) Kremlin.
[Also, see this series of short videos]
The EU Offers the Populations of 9 (nine) Muslim Countries Free Movement of Goods, Services, Capital and People into the EU.
In return for concrete political and economic changes the EU offers integration in the expanded internal market of the EU, and the possibility to obtain free movement for goods, services, money and people.
“We will tackle stereotypes and prejudices and ignorance and change the daily ‘news journalism‘ to portray every-day life of ordinary people, which can create identification and fascination – and intercultural understanding. We will tackle our stereotypical images of people from foreign cultures and make new experiments with pictures in public places, in the media, and advertising.
And we will have common projects with people from other cultures. We will develop the intercultural skills of journalists, school pupils and artists and exchange people from these groups with (Muslim) colleagues. We will manage art and cultural productions. We will train the school teachers and influence their education to be multicultural.
And we will influence the curricula of the schools to become multicultural by means of revision of existing textbooks and educational materials.
….continue to Full Article HERE.
…and, Utopian race-mixers would have an apoplectic fit upon seeing this beautiful race of people seen in the video below.
Note: The audio ceases during the last 30 seconds at 4:28
ONE People, ONE Culture, ONE Race, ONE Nation, ONE Language United in Song
“Germany now has a Turkish Party representing the millions of Turks who have flooded into the country. These Turks will be joined by a vast army of their compatriots if the traitors in the European Commission get their way and Turkey (and Asian land) joins the EUROPEAN Union. In Spain, vast numbers of sub-Saharan Africans are taking up housing, and crippling vital services, yet those who state that it is wrong for our own to be treated as second class citizens in our own lands, are shrieked at as bigots. In France, there is a crackdown on pro-French groups who dare to speak out in defence of France, and against the handing over of entire cities to Third-World immigrants. The pattern is repeated across Europe, and it is deliberate. Governments which serve the internationalist agenda are deliberately destroying our lands and targeting our people for genocide.” >Rufus
…and what’s happening in SWEDEN?
“Africans Waiting To Crash The European Gate”
(The above 50,000,000 (millions) figure is NOT a joke, nor a misprint – ELN Editor
[What’s the percentage (%) of WHITE people on Earth? Answer.]
A European Union Job Centre for AFRICAN migrants seeking work in Europe has been SECRETLY opened in the West African state of Cape Verde.
The project is the second phase of a Brussels tax-funded plan to invite more than 50,000,000 (million) AFRICAN workers into Britain, and other members of the 27-nation EU bloc.
The “advice” centre, based in the island nation’s poverty-stricken capital Praia, follows a similar (European) JOB CENTRE opened in the desert African state of Mali in October.
The project is part of the EU’s controversial plan to “help” AFRICANS find work legally in Europe.
The centre will provide details of job opportunities in EU (European Union) states, including Britain, and provide training and support for potential migrants. It is being heralded as a “pilot scheme”by EU officials for OTHER job centres across Africa and Eastern Europe.
But last night the timing of the scheme to invite a new wave of migrant workers to Europe was called into question as tens of thousands fear for their jobs across Britain and other EU states in the gloomy economic climate.
UKIP leader Nigel Farage asked:
“What the devil are we doing OPENING UP JOB CENTRES IN AFRICA when we have 400,000 projected to lose their jobs in the UK in the next six months?”
Matthew Elliott, of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “As people all over Britain and Europe face redundancy and unemployment as the recession bites, it is ludicrous that the EU is frittering away taxpayers’ money on such inappropriate schemes.”
Coming to YOUR town — and destroying 1500 years of European History
Thousands of educated indigenous IRISH people are forced to seek jobs in other Western countries while being replaced by hordes of unskilled, illiterate Black African BOGUS “refugees” foolishly welcomed into Ireland!? What madness!
A productive White man’s story in how he was deported and banned from Ireland while they give preference to “enrichers” having the the world’s lowest common denominator.>> Read: Blacks LESS Intelligent
One frustrated British woman’s profanity-lace diatribe in the video below demonstrates the seething anger that many Britons feel today, but most are too afraid to openly express themselves … as did Emma West.
SWEDEN has the highest incidence of reported rapes in Europe — twice as many as “runner up” the UK, a new study shows.
Researchers behind the EU study, which will be presented on Tuesday, conclude that rape appears to be a more common occurrence in Sweden than in continental European countries.
In Sweden, 46 incidents of rape are reported per 100,000 residents. This figure is double as many as in the UK which reports 23 cases, and four times that of the other Nordic countries, Germany and France. The figure is up to 20 times (20X) the figure for certain countries in southern and eastern Europe.
A report from the organization Save the Children told that Swedish girls are scared of being raped, a possibility that appears very real to them. A survey carried out among ninth-grade boys in the IMMIGRANT-DOMINATED suburb of Rinkeby (Sweden) showed that in the last year, 17% of the boys had forced someone to have sex, 31% had hurt someone so badly that the victim required medical care, and 24% had committed burglary or broken into a car. Sensational statistics, but they appear to have been published only in a daily newssheet that is distributed free on the subways.
“It is not as wrong raping a Swedish girl as raping an Arab girl,” says Hamid, in an interview about a gang rape involving a Swedish girl and immigrant perps. “The Swedish girl gets a lot of help afterwards, and she had probably f**ked before, anyway. But the Arab girl will get problems with her family. For her, being raped is a source of shame. It is important that she (Arab girl) retains her virginity… It is far too easy to get a Swedish whore… girl, I mean;” says Hamid, and laughs over his own choice of words. “I don’t have too much respect for Swedish girls. I guess you can say they get f**ked to pieces.”
In an article from June 2007 with the title “Summertime — rape time,” Aftonbladet, one of the largest dailies in Scandinavia, linked the spike in rapes during the summer to the warm weather. The official number of rape charges in Sweden has more than quadrupled during one generation, even more for girls under the age of 15. If this is due to the warm weather, I suppose the Scandinavian rape wave is caused by global warming? The fact that a greatly disproportionate number of the suspects have an immigrant background according to statistics from neighboring Norway and Denmark is purely coincidental, no doubt. Read MORE….
Gang Raping Muslims in AUSTRALIA, too!
…and, a ‘good news’ European video
…and check out Sweden’s http://cavatus.wordpress.com/
Switzerland‘s migration authority initiated and directed the campaign, which has included producing a promotional film during the past few months meant to scare away potential illegal immigrants, according to German business daily Handelsblatt.
The paper reported on Monday, Nov. 26, that a spokesperson for Switzerland‘s Federal Migration Office in Berne confirmed the ad was being shown on television in Cameroon and Nigeria, and may soon be aired in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
The Geneva-based International Organization for Migration (IOM) said it had actually produced the campaign, which was funded by the Swiss migration office. The aim of the campaign is to “give a more balanced view of irregular migration networks,” IOM spokesman Jean-Philippe Chauzy told AFP news agency.
Some African migrants pay thousands of dollars to smuggling networks who promise them that life in Switzerland or other European countries will be easy, without warning them of the risks of exploitation, poverty and deportation they will face, Chauzy said.
Many others die in their attempts to flee African countries by water.
“Stay home, since Europe is not the continent of milk and honey.
No one’s waiting for you there,” Handelsblatt summarized the message of the film to be. “Fleeing does not mean starting a new life,” the last sentence of the film states. >>MORE