It may be helpful to mute the sound until 11:35 when Jared Taylor speaks.
Are you still brainwashed by those false Orwellian and nonsensical slogans asserting “Diversity is Our Strength“?
Multiculturalism/Multi-Racialism is a planned and sinister strategy designed to destabilize all White western countries. And it’s working!
All White western nations seem to be simultaneously inundated with incompatible Peoples and religions from 3rd world countries, whether during times of good or bad economic climates. That should be a clue to any rational thinking person who believes needless mass-immigration policies are a benefit to western economies. Not so!
It took centuries of wars, blood, sweat and tears for tribal fiefdoms and kingdoms to morph into individual European nation states that eventually became world economic power-houses on their own initiatives.
Why introduce poor, incompatible 3rd world immigrants to today’s European-based countries on such a massive scale…. unless, the objective is to create chaotic conditions that disrupts the natural equilibrium of a country.
One country’s strong cohesive force consisting of ONE People, ONE Culture, ONE Race, and ONE Language united in their national song, can be a powerful experience as seen in this video.
Note: The audio ceases during the last 30 seconds at 4:28
[P.S. From the 7,000,000,000 people on earth, the total percentage (%) of WHITE people is....? Answer.]
How do we explain the phenomenon of ‘young white trash‘ imitating Black gangs (in Britain’s recent riots)?
“Well, the answer is simple and can be clearly identified by the reaction of the police, the media and the government to the riots. What was the reaction? It was to:
(1) leave the Blacks to riot, loot and burn;
(2) crack down hard on any Whites who dared to share their faces to defend themselves and their property e.g. Enfield (1000 police vs 200 Whites was one example);
(3) praise gangs of Sikhs and other Asians who gathered to fight any rioters and carried swords and other weapons to do so — their photographs appeared all over the place, and articles were written comparing them favourably over the Whites (they know how to handle the rioters better than we do – and there was even an article in the DT saying that immigrants love this country more than we do);
(4) minimize the involvement of Blacks in the rioting (the BBC were particularly bad at this);
(5) maximize the involvement of Whites (the BBC again – but pretty much all the other media as well);
(6) interview as many Blackvictims, shopkeepers and community leaders as possible (the politicians in particular did this).
I could go on but you get the point.
What all this indicates is a culture which has existed for decades now — that of excusing almost anything non-whites (Blacks, Muslims and other immigrants) do – even including burning and looting our cities – where they get preferential treatment in (apparently) practically every walk of life. This culture is enshrined in law and rigorously enforced by the courts.
In fact, the more violent and intolerant the Blacks and other minorities become, the more money we throw at them. The more we try to ‘understand‘ them, the more ‘inter-community harmony groups‘ we help establish for them, and then more “advisers” are appointed in our government, councils, police and so forth.
There is no doubt about it; WHITES are treated as an underclass in their own country.
Is it any surprise that uneducated White youths look at all this and see everyone (from the media, to the government, to the courts, etc.) almost KISSING THE ARSES OF IMMIGRANTS (excuse the language but we must be honest about this,) and conclude that the obvious thing is to almost become an immigrant themselves to receive such lavish government attention, plus generous monetary rewards.
And there you have it. If you want to solve these problems the answer is simple. DON’T TREAT THE INDIGENOUS WHITE PEOPLE AS AN UNDERCLASS (in their own country). You have stolen their self-respect. I suggest that you give it back to them.
You (the government, the media and so on) can stick that in your ‘consultation exercise‘ pipe and smoke it.” -Source-
This paper reviews some of the key facts about productivity. And it notes that immigration is never mentioned as a factor tending to depress productivity. It then goes on to apply the methodology of growth accounting to calculate an estimate of the impact of recent immigration on productivity. This in turn calls into question the wisdom of the Government’s immigration policies as part of any evidenced-based strategy to improve the living standards of Canadians.
[...]
Productivity growth in Canada has increasingly been falling behind that in the United States. While GDP per worker in current US dollars is not the best measure of productivity as it incorporates inflation as well as real increase in output, it is often used for purposes of comparison. By this measure, the productivity gap between Canada and the United States, after remaining relatively stable for decades up to 1983, began to rise significantly thereafter with the increase accelerating after 2000.
In spite of all the recent attention on Canada’s relatively slow productivity growth, the important issue of the implications of the poor labour market performance of recent cohorts of immigrants for productivity growth has yet to be analyzed and quantified as a possible factor.
[...]
The 2006 census data revealing the poor labour market performance of recent cohorts of immigrants are cause for concern, especially when combined with the continued high level of immigration after 2005, which is planned to persist indefinitely in the future. Growth accounting suggests that immigration will continue to have a large and growing negative impact on labour productivity, which will only cease when the immigrants that are selected and admitted are able to earn at least as much as non-immigrants.
Given that the largest proportion of immigrants are NOT selected based on their skills, but rather are dependents of economic class immigrants, family class immigrants or refugees, it doesn’t appear likely that new immigrants will earn as much on average as non-immigrants in the foreseeable future. Thus immigration can be expected to exert a continued depressing effect on productivity.
As an aside, it will unfortunately no longer be possible to monitor the impact of immigration on productivity using the census as the data on the earnings of immigrants utilized in this paper comes from the census long form which is being eliminated in the 2011 census.
But, at least for the present, the data from the 2006 census provides a clear indication that from an economic point of view Canada’s immigration program has lowered productivity growth and has contributed significantly to the growing productivity gap with the United States.
[...]
The fly in the ointment is that only 17% of immigrants are actually selected under the skilled worker program, and that they bring with them or sponsor family members who do not have the same level of skills, and who usually perform worse in the labour market.
To actually increase productivity, immigrants have to be more productive than existing workers in Canada, which, given that earnings reflect productivity, means that they must earn more than existing workers. If the Government were to only admit such immigrants, it could justifiably claim that immigration policy was productivity enhancing.
However, since there is no indication that the Government only intends to admit immigrants likely to achieve a higher than average level of earnings, there is no way that the government’s proposed immigration policy can conceivably be portrayed as helping to lower the Canada-U.S. labour productivity gap.
A Final Word
Don’t believe anyone when they tell you that immigration is raising productivity, or that it is likely to reduce the Canada-U.S. productivity gap. A careful analysis of the data using the standard analytical tool of growth accounting in the most simple and straightforward way possible, shows that this just isn’t true. As the American humorist who called himself Artemus Ward said, “It ain’t so much the things we don’t know that get us in trouble. It’s the things we know that ain’t so”. >to Full Article
This is not a titillating novel, nor a light read, but a serious attempt to uncover EU (European Union)schemes to destroy our European civilisation and replace it with Islam. I have put in lots of links because I want others to research this too, and I hope, write up what they find.
There were a series of secretive European Union-agreements with ten European and North African Countries. It is a series of meetings from The Barcelona Agreement to the Euro Mediterranean Declaration of 1995. The following is an abstract with links so readers can check my sources and I hope pursue their own research and writing.
The Euro Mediterranean Declaration was agreed by the EU, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan, the Palestinian Authority, Syria, Lebanon, Turkey and Israel ……..
Multiculturalism is to be respected in order to promote tolerance between different ethnic groups in society. The importance of a resolute common campaign against racism, xenophobia and intolerance is emphasized. This was predicted by Vladimir Bukovskyfrom secret documents he filmed in The (Communist Russian) Kremlin.
The EU Offers the Populations of 9 (nine) Muslim Countries Free Movement of Goods, Services, Capitaland People into the EU.
In return for concrete political and economic changes the EU offers integration in the expanded internal market of the EU, and the possibility to obtain free movement for goods, services, money and people.
“We will tackle stereotypes and prejudices and ignorance and change the daily ‘news journalism‘ to portray every-day life of ordinary people, which can create identification and fascination – and intercultural understanding. We will tackle our stereotypical images of people from foreign cultures and make new experiments with pictures in public places, in the media, and advertising.
And we will have common projects with people from other cultures. We will develop the intercultural skills of journalists, school pupils and artists and exchange people from these groups with (Muslim) colleagues. We will manage art and cultural productions. We will train the school teachers and influence their education to be multicultural.
And we will influence the curricula of the schools to become multicultural by means of revision of existing textbooks and educational materials.
Statism is a doctrine that maintains, that your life, money and property are not yours… but the property of the state. A statist is any person who upholds this doctrine and/or supports its implementation.
A statist knows that he cannot get away with—at least, not yet—openly declaring that your life, money and property are not yours, so he advances these ideas by implicit means.
Statists enact laws that forbid you from taking certain actions altogether or only if you have their permission—and the idea is: if you may only act by permission, you do not have a right to your life.
Statists, through their regulations, decide how much of your money you will be allowed to keep—and the idea is: if you do not have the right to decide how your money is spent, your money is not yours.
Statists issue decrees restricting how you may use your property—and the idea is: if you do not have the right to control the use and disposal of your property, your property is not yours. These are the indirect means by which statists promote and carry out their ideas.
An adult statist is grown up, physically, but in a state of self-arrested, stunted, mental development. His worldview is that of a child who can only do what his parents permit and who is dependent on his parents for everything.
In the adult world, he seeks to forcibly impose this view on others. You are the child and the state, run by statists, is the parent. The statist may do anything he wants, while you may only do what the statist permits—bringing us a complete reversal of the way it should be. In fact, you should be free to do whatever you want (so long as you do not violate the right of another to do the same), while government officials should only be able to do what the law specifically permits—and no more.
The irony of it all is the fact that statists, left to their own devices, are impotent, powerless to harm you. The power that they wield comes from the willing support of their victims, from the very people they control, from any and all who earn a living and produce the financial and material means statists use to regulate others.
All that it would take for statists to lose this power over you, is to stop supporting them. A statist’s greatest fear is your discovery of this fact.
In his impotence, a statist seeks to escape the terror of facing reality by ruling the competent, the capable—those who do face reality. In a free society, statists would only be able to rise to the level of their ability, which, for most, would not be very far. In a statist society, their ability to produce is irrelevant. They can rise to the extent to which they are able to forcibly harness others—taking statists to heights impossible to them in a free society.
A statist hates self-reliance, so he forces you to rely on others and others to rely on you. He will use anyone and anything to control you and force you into dependence: your children, your elderly parents, your neighbors who have fallen on hard times, your friends who are ill. Every human problem or disaster is an opportunity to be capitalized upon by a statist—another chance to enlarge his powers.
A statist is that schoolyard bully, or one of his equal during your childhood years. But now he is grown up, all dressed up in a suit. The only way he can allay his constant anxiety and dread is through the control and intimidation of others. He doesn’t want to conquer nature…. but only other men. He wants to cheat reality, not abide by it. He wants to get away with living… not live his life on his own.
A statist only has self-identity if the eyes of others are focused on him. He only feels alive if is he is part of some group, so he forces others into adoring, dependent herds who must curry his favor to survive.
A statist hates the independent mind, since he doesn’t have one of his own. He can’t really think…..he can only manipulate words, ideas that are cut off from reality, emotions and other people—these are his only reality. To a statist, reality is not real—thus, the truth doesn’t matter. Lies, deception—and the truth, on occasion—are interchangeable tools, one as valid as another, to be used to pander to the worst in man: the desire for the unearned.
A statist is that mooching relative, now a bureaucrat, for whom there can never be enough handouts. He is a panhandler with a gun who despises your charity as an insult, but claims your money as a right. He is a criminal who has gone from bad to worse: an armed robber doesn’t try to convince you that he is taking your money for your own good, but a statist politician does.
Such is the face and soul of a statist.
Before you vote for another statist politician, ask yourself this: would you—and take this literally—sign a legal document giving control over you life, money and property to another person—let’s say, to your Congressman? I doubt it. I doubt if even many of the witless supporters of statism would do this, yet this is precisely what you effectively do when you support statism. When you vote for statist politicians, you give them a proxy, a power of attorney of sorts, to carry out their ideas in practice, to vote away some part of your life, money and property.
The liberation of your life and the recognition of your right to it—to live it without seeking anyone’s permission—will only come once you revoke that proxy given to statists. Once this occurs, the rebirth of freedom will begin in earnest. >Source
(The above 50,000,000 (millions) figure is NOT a joke, nor a misprint – ELN Editor
[What’s the percentage (%) of WHITE people on Earth? Answer.]
A European Union Job Centre for AFRICAN migrants seeking work in Europe has been SECRETLY opened in the West African state of Cape Verde.
The project is the second phase of a Brussels tax-funded plan to invite more than 50,000,000 (million) AFRICAN workers into Britain, and other members of the 27-nation EU bloc.
The “advice” centre, based in the island nation’s poverty-stricken capital Praia, follows a similar (European) JOB CENTRE opened in the desertAfrican state of Mali in October.
The project is part of the EU’s controversial plan to “help” AFRICANS find work legally in Europe.
The centre will provide details of job opportunities in EU (European Union) states, including Britain, and provide training and support for potential migrants. It is being heralded as a “pilot scheme”by EU officials for OTHER job centres across Africa and Eastern Europe.
But last night the timing of the scheme to invite a new wave of migrant workers to Europe was called into question as tens of thousands fear for their jobs across Britain and other EU states in the gloomy economic climate.
UKIP leader Nigel Farage asked:
“What the devil are we doing OPENING UP JOB CENTRES IN AFRICA when we have 400,000 projected to lose their jobs in the UK in the next six months?”
Matthew Elliott, of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “As people all over Britain and Europe face redundancy and unemployment as the recession bites, it is ludicrous that the EU is frittering away taxpayers’ money on such inappropriate schemes.”
The project is part of EU Commissioner Louis Michel’smaster plan for the “mobility” of workers between African states and Europe. (All BOLD typeface by ELN) -Source-
Coming to a town near YOU — and destroying 1500 years of European History
Thousands of educated indigenous IRISH people are forced to seek jobs in other Western countries, yet hordes of illiterate Black African immigrants are granted entry???
A British citizenship ceremony in 2005, at the London Borough of Tower Hamlets. The Mayor of Tower Hamlets is shown. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
By Anthony Milne
The problems of multi-culturalism in Britain are now doing enormous harm to the professional classes. Journalists, priests, politicians and professional specialists of all kinds live in perpetual fear that one of the biggest ideological experiments of all time….. getting different races and nationalities to live together in one homeland – will sooner or later break down into vicious sectarianism.
Many parts of the liberal establishment are now becoming extremely uneasy about the reckless and unthinking way in which the Government shows its determination to carry on with its policy of only barely restricted immigration, regardless of what people want or what is in the interests of the nation.
The Government itself, by getting involved in fraudulent immigration scams, is damaging political life, and will lower the quality of aspiring future MPs, attracting only oddballs and traitors.
Town planners, actuaries and demographic experts working at the Office for National Statistics (ONC) and the National Audit Office (NAO) are in danger of having their reputations damaged because of the relentless pressure on them to disguise or gloss over uncomfortable social facts. The ten-year census which social commentators rely on has lost all credibility, since millions do not fill in the census form truthfully.
For similar reasons, writers who make a living out of promoting conspiracy theories alleging that every aspect of our daily lives is being electronically monitored by the ‘secret state’ are made to look foolish when it is openly acknowledged that the ‘Big Brother’ authorities have no idea how many tens (or hundreds) of thousands of people illegally enter or leave the country every year.
Equally lacking in credibility is the parallel argument that a secret Illuminati of global ruling élites are conspiring to set up a one-world police state to rule us all with a rod of iron, since so many migrants around the world are on the move that quite the opposite will soon take place: total racial and cultural anarchy and rampant intifada-like lawlessness.
Local Authorities in the Dark
For example, even on the local level most authorities now do not know who is living in their boroughs, since the council tax form sent to every household depends upon volunteered information. People drop themselves off the electoral roll, and there is no follow-up check by council officials. The NAO recently said that Labour’s figures on immigration and asylum are misleading and highly suspect, with hundreds of thousands of immigrants not accounted for. Researchers say there are no figures, or even estimates, available for illegal immigration, since many entrants are avoiding being counted as asylum claimants by simply overstaying their work or student visas.
District and county registrars have also been badly affected by illegality. A huge bogus marriage racket is now in existence, whereby foreigners who have been ‘granted’ British citizenship can confer permanent domicile rights on thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of yet more foreigners simply by ‘marrying’ them in a registry office under the gaze of a hapless registry clerk who suspects that he is being drawn into a criminal racket but can do nothing about it.
Illegal positive discrimination in housing, in the medical profession and in police recruitment policies is becoming commonplace. Chief constables are fast-tracking ethnic-minority officers to promotion in a bid to make police forces “more representative of the communities they serve” – which is proof that the police are now focusing on politically correct ideals rather than enforcing the law without fear or favour. But they are making a great mistake in deploying black officers in multi-racial areas, since race, instead of being downplayed, is actually thereby played up. In addition, the policy hints that black youths have disproportionate criminal tendencies, and can relate only to black officers who have some “understanding” of these tendencies!
Effects of white flight
Housing patterns are becoming seriously distorted nationwide because in some cities white flight has become a self-fulfilling prophecy. The arrival of ethnic minorities in a white area is associated with falling house prices, sparking a mad rush for people to get out before they lose too much money. But this is seldom commented on by housing economists.
Sociology is no longer a serious investigative subject, since its published output is dominated by politically correct sloganising. The last thing sociologists will do is talk about the number of foreigners living in this country, where they come from and why they have the right to live here permanently.
Journalists also suspect that they are being blatantly manipulated, soviet-style, as when it was revealed in late May that the Home Office was planning a major spin to neutralise ‘bad news’ about immigration and asylum.
This was an unpleasant example of a highly political strategy to use millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money to place ‘positive’ stories about immigrants with friendly media organisations. Thus the link between media and political elites, as a conspiracy against the British people, was openly revealed by the press itself. Reference was made to a major advertising campaign designed to imply that “immigration is good for Britain.” A typical Politburo document was issued with the aim to “communicate the impression of a system under more control,” rather than actually to get it under control. “The challenge,” we read, “is in finding new ways to package and communicate these issues in a way that makes it easier for people to see the big picture… We need a consistent message in this area.”
Similarly, foreign correspondents in the media, who report daily on the growth of rebel movements around the world, along with the never-ending ethnic and tribal warfare everywhere, must somehow imply that Britain is a special case because such tribalism is never likely to occur here, so it’ll be perfectly safe to go on letting in the foreign tribes! The Metropolitan Police chiefs in London, constantly issuing hair-raising alarms about possible terrorist attacks in the capital, never for one moment suggest that undocumented and unknown foreigners should not be allowed into the country under any circumstances.
Terrorist Friendly Lawyers
The legal profession now has a negative media image: the image of crooked lawyers trying to prevent terrorists and Islamic racists from being brought to book. Judges are increasingly subjected to politically correct ‘guidelines’, one of which is that they must avoid using phrases such as ‘asylum-seekers’ or ‘second-generation immigrants’ because this is likely to cause offence to such people! Both the terms ‘coloured’ and ‘mixed-race’ are considered either offensive or “slightly pejorative.”
Sir Bernard Crick was once an esteemed political philosopher and author of a biography of George Orwell. His credibility is now on the line because he used Orwellian phrases such as ‘citizenship’, and was heard to hurl abuse at Sir Andrew Green and his Migrationwatch organisation. Sir Bernard apparently believes that ‘Britishness’ is defined nowadays only by political or legal criteria (the jus soli principle). In other words, Britain has become a virtual South Africa, where ‘Whites’, ‘Blacks’ and ‘Coloureds’ live together in a single territorial zone that has been stripped of its historic identity. This is despite the fact that every single town and district in the land has been named after British local history, and all have been built by the British themselves.
Yet the current national dialogue about citizenship is becoming more problematic for the ethnic minorities, not less. Many of them are recent arrivals and speak foreign languages, so cannot join in the debate about continued migration without some feeling of ambivalence about it. This is the one aspect of life in Britain in which they remain ‘excluded’.
And the more immigrants come here to live the more these existential problems will grow and fester. Britain now suffers from glaring, visible incongruities that it didn’t have some 30 years ago:different races, many wearing traditional attire, can be seen strolling about British suburban streets, looking as if they are going to a fancy-dress party. This madness arises from the schizoid notion of ‘multiple identities‘.
Race is about national origins
But there is nothing ‘multiple’ about race. Race indicates national origins, and this is why the rules are frequently changing in order to get round the problem or to avoid embarrassment or hurt to people’s feelings. Black people don’t do themselves any favours by voting for black MPs just because they cannot identify with the white (i.e. indigenous British) ones. This raises the awkward question of why they bothered migrating here at all, and whether they truly believe that ‘Britishness’ is a race-free concept.
On the other hand, many BLACKS, wanting to enjoy the fruits of white western civilisation (but not being able to create it themselves), want to live amongst White people and become honorary Whites. The black TV broadcaster clearly gets more status by broadcasting in a White society than he would in a black society!
There is still no final arbiter on this wretched matter, since no community – the indigenous or the diaspora – has decided how Britain is to be defined. At the moment it is the white British themselves who are changing the rules on an ad hoc basis – sometimes Britain is a multi-cultural, sometimes a multi-racial and sometimes a multiple-identity country.
But we must be forewarned. A mixed-up society like Britain cannot function satisfactorily without becoming more authoritarian, because there will be an obvious need to repress or contain cultural tensions, and to brainwash and indoctrinate people. Unless there is drastic change, life in Britain (Canada, Australia, N.Z. & U.S.A.) will be exceedingly unpleasant in the future.
Maynard Brazeal…the retired Director of the Kansas Law Enforcement Training Center told me privately…….. that the moral character of the men and women he was preparing for a career in law enforcement would determine if America remained free or would be under police-state conditions.
Mr. Brazeal is one of those few exceptionally talented men who knew police work well and also knows that society’s thin line between jungle rule and ordered society is but one riot away from catastrophe.
[…]
I will suggest that you consider my view of our near term future. It is a future nearly upon us. It will test character, strength and the dispensation of street justice by police officers at all levels beyond anything Maynard, Jim or I have thus far experienced.
We are re-entering the “dark ages” as my neighbor Nancy Levant has stated. She is also a hero in this struggle to wake up Americans to our coming disaster. When the time comes to begin enforcing the decrees and the full agenda of the new world order, our friends in law enforcement will have a very tough set of choices to make.
[…]
Police officers will be given the ultimate responsibility to see that each one of us is carrying out the dictates of the government. They will do so because they have sworn to uphold the “law.” Ultimately, the “law” will be what politicians and corrupted courts say [what] it is.
[…]
Officers who have survived extreme background checks for compatibility with authority dictates and those who have proven that they will carry out ANY order given, will use this new definition of “character” to justify the investigation, arrest, detention, prosecution and imprisonment of “enemies of the state.”
[…]
Police officers at all levels have a sworn duty to resist this coming event (police-state suppression) with all the information, real constitutional authority to resist and guidance from servants of the public mentality, Chiefs and Sheriffs across this nation.
[…]
As that drama begins to unfold, as the government becomes the master of all and the people literally become the slaves, then I will abandon my efforts to educate, train and encourage my fellow citizens for peaceful change.
The time is now.
This must happen now, if we are to believe that our men and women who wear the badge and have given their oaths will be there at that moment to truly defend us from the criminals who have given the “orders” to arrest the innocent.
If our police forces, acting on what they believe is the right thing, ordered by thugs in our government to do the wrong thing, carries out those illegal and freedom killing final orders, then there WILL be bloodshed on a scale not seen in our nation before.
Deputy Barney Fife asks Andy Griffith – “WHAT HAPPENED TO US, ANDY?”
[…]
I pray to God that Maynard Brazeal was right when he said that thecharacter of the men and women in uniform will ultimately determine whether we live free or in a police state. I am counting on you, my friends in law enforcement. Please do not let your country down.
[Here in Canada, the clearest illustration of the above scenario can be found in CALEDONIA, Ontario where the Ontario Provincial Police [O.P.P.] are handcuffed to a political agenda that is wreaking havoc on their credibility to enforce the law with equal dispensation.
Police-State tactics of outright intimidation by the O.P.P. of an outspoken critic of the “two-tiered” justice system resulted in a dissenting law-abiding Canadian citizen being jailed overnight without charges for carrying out his sovereign right to place our national flag on a pole! –ELN Editor-] More here:HERE
United Nations, Human Rights Charter, Article 19 states: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”
[Most people] “confuse the dreary recitation of politically correct gibberish with sensitivity that they think they have arrived at through their own value clarification”. –Tomislav Sunic
"Rather than love, than money, than fame, give me TRUTH." — Henry David Thoreau
"Happiness is not the goal of existence, but the byproduct of a life well lived and the purpose of life is TRUTH... not pleasure".
"For most people, the desire not to deviate too far from the herd, prevents them from telling the truth they really feel inside. What would the neighbors think?" -- John Kaminski
Current Weather
~~~~~ ELLIOT LAKE NEWS & VIEWS is a Blog helping to slay the many-headed dragon of "political correctness" with the effective weapon called TRUTH.
Subjects pertaining to mass 3rd-world immigration, multi-culturalism and racial identity are are given special priorities here, and from which material you may either accept or reject at your personal discretion.
Opinions are accepted without ad hominem attacks or insults. Personal responses to any commentary or questions will be kept to a bare minimum due to time constraints.
Miscellaneous
> All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed.
Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer
German philosopher (1788 -1860)
The truth that makes men free is for the most part the truth which men prefer not to hear.
“In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” -Orwell
To get the oil price, please enable Javascript.
![[Most Recent Charts from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_usoz_4.gif)
