In one of the more outrageous recent cases of the “pot calling the kettle black”, the blacks-onlyMetropolitan Black Police Association (BPA) has again … accused the Metropolitan Police of London, England, of being “institutionally racist.”
Metropolitan Police officers in London’s Trafalgar Square
This cry of “institutional racism” is nothing else but NON-whites decrying the fact that they tend to be stopped, searched and arrested more often than Whites. The reason for this is, of course, because as a statistical average, NON-whites commit more crime than Whites.
However, rather than admit this obvious fact, NON-white organisations such as the “Metropolitan Black Police Association” and White liberals, will prefer instead … to blame White people. This tactic is used the world over to excuse high NON-white crime rates (in White countries), or even failure to perform properly at any level in western society.
[What’s the percentage (%) of WHITE PEOPLE on Earth? ANSWER.]
The irony of a blacks-only organisation calling another body “institutionally racist” is also lost on these people, who genuinely think that only they have the right to organise along racial grounds. If any London police officials had to set up a “Metropolitan White Police Association” they would be drummed out of the force as “racist.”
According to the black police organisation, “Institutional racism is not about labelling individuals racists, but rather police practice and procedures that bring about disproportionate outcomes for black and minority ethnic communities and police personnel.”
In other words, black members of the force don’t do as well in the tests and courses set out to achieve promotion within the police—and therefore Whites are to blame.
In addition, the BPA has blamed the (White) police for not recruiting enough NON-whites, implying that it is once again White peoples’ fault that blacks, Pakistanis, Chinese and the huge mixture of races in London, shy away from joining law enforcement.
According to the BPA, the “2011 census indicated that over 40% of Londoners were from BME backgrounds, whilst only 10% of MPS police officers were from BME communities.” (Note: Typically, they have their figures wrong. The latest UK census showed that 54% of Londoners were from ‘Black and Minority Ethnic’ –BME—communities).
“These officers disproportionately hug the lower ranks, face significantly slower rates of career progression and are over-represented in disciplinary actions, in comparison to their White counterparts,” the BPA continued.
Note once again, the “blame whitey” phenomenon. Because NON-white police officers commit more internal offenses, and are thus “over-represented in disciplinary action,” it is White peoples’ fault—not that of the offending officers.
This situation, the BPA claims is “unsustainable, as it severely impacts on police legitimacy and more importantly erodes trust and confidence in BME communities.”
The logic is breath-taking, and possibly only the arrogance exceeds its stupidity. The BPA is saying that because NON-white police officers commit more internal offenses than White officers, and do poorly on internal promotional exams, the rest of the NON-white community blames White people for “racism” and therefore does not trust them.
The madness goes on: Superintendent Leroy Logan, chair of the Met BPA (Metropolitan Black Police Association) charitable trust, said … before the (Police) force could consider itself free of “institutional racism“, it must tackle the continuing disproportions in the treatment of minority Londoners.
“The real litmus test is still the vexed issue of stop and search and its disproportionality in black and minority ethnic (BME) communities, because so many people perceive that the police are involved in racial profiling?”
Metropolitan Police Service helmet
A recent review of “stop-and-search policing” in London found that black “youths” are up to six times more likely to be stopped than Whites, and that in “authorised localised stops” under section 60 of the 1994 Public Order Act, NON-whites are 28 times more likely to be stopped.
Once again, this is because the evidence is clear that those communities commit more crime, not because of “White racism.” >Source: Western Spring U.K.
(Added for emphasis are all Bold and underlined words, with added links by ELN Editor)
Any seasoned traveller will attest to the fact that Heathrow (International Airport) is a dreadful place.
Grossly inefficient, badly run, incomprehensible work practises. In any good airport transfer passengers will merely exit one plane and head for the appropriate gate to embark on the next one. No need for customs or passport formalities as one remains ‘airside’, which infers that all relevant controls are in place. But today, by the time I had landed at Terminal 4, to embarking at Terminal 1, I had to go through no fewer than four security checks.
And here’s the rub.
The “security” was provided by a scurvy bunch of mad-eyed, bearded Muslim fanatics — burkah clad Afghans (and) Blacks who seemed to have just emerged from the jungle. It’s not allowed, but to underline my point I discreetly photographed a representative sample, shown here. Do you need further proof?
Yes, the specimens you see here … force blond and blue-eyed English girls (to go) through humiliating ‘security’ tests … remove your shoes, come over here while I grope your private parts, go back again through the scanner. Brandishing their security clearance, in the event of, even a weary sigh from the victims.
Osama bin Laden in 1997
As I went through yet another ‘security’ procedure, this time performed by an Osama bin Ladenlook-alike, contemplating as I did, the virtual certainty of my luggage getting mislaid (it did!) … I sighed that this was like a Turd World airport.
And then the penny dropped with a loud clang. It IS a Turd World airport, for Chrissake! Because with close to 80% of the staff there emanating from South Asia or Africa … by definition … it IS Turd World.
Figures from the 2011 (U.K.) Census show that immigration of people from India, Bangladesh and Pakistan means that in some parts of London … fewer than 1 in 3 people are White.
Overall, the proportion of White people in Britain has fallen from 91% in 2001 to now 86% in 2011. The fall has taken place despite an influx of White immigrants from Poland.
The number of people who are mixed race has risen to more than 1m for the first time … from 664,000 to 1.2 million.
The number of Asian (meaning Indian, Pakistani) people in Britain has risen by two-thirds from 2.5 Million people to 4,200,000, while the number of Black people has risen from 1.1m to 1,800,000 people.
A growing force of belligerent MUSLIM Invaders who meet with no resistence in the once “great” Britain, except for this lone British woman.
The West Midlands also has a high proportion of minority ethnic groups, with 4.1% of people of Pakistani origin, 3.9% who were Indian and 1.5% who were Caribbean (Blacks).
The overall percentage of people identifying themselves as Cornish in England and Wales was just 83,000.
However, in Cornwall 1 in 8 people said their national identity was Cornish.
Wales was the least ethnically diverse place in England and Wales, with just 1% of people from ethnic minorities. >Source
Dateline AUSTRALIA: Much the same happening "Down Under".
(Bold print, Italics, parenthesis () and underlined… all by ELN Editor)
A BLACK murder victim’s family received 18 years of an unremitting police investigation into their son’s murder because the killers were presumed to be White.
Millions of media words were readily made available to the British public in reporting the Stephen Lawrence case since his 1993 stabbing death.
Mainstream media has essentially made a martyr out of the Black victim in this case, while White British murder victims killed by Black and Asian minorities are deemed not worthy of wide publicity.
Violent crimes, including murders instigated by racial minorities towards Whites are simply not given enough national exposure, but they may receive 18 seconds of local coverage.
This entire Stephen Lawrence saga has not only cost police careers, but also concluded that London’s Metropolitan police force was “institutionally racist” as stated by the infamous Macpherson Report.
Long standing British Laws that stood the test of time for hundreds of years were changed when it was recommended the double jeopardy rule be abrogated in murder cases to allow a retrial upon “new and compelling evidence“. Incredibly, that became law in 2005.
A “honey pot” in the name of the Stephen Lawrence Charitable Trust was also established for purposes of fund-raising, but no link will be provided here.
In total, the media frenzy helped propel this case to stratospheric levels of publicity and cost taxpayers tens of millions of British pounds over the years.
The Stephen Lawrence case is so well-known that his name has become a British household word since those early days in 1993, and whose body was transported and buried in Jamaica!
“I assume you have all your own teeth, the only essential requirement we ask of prospective British policemen these days? You do? Excellent, excellent, sign here, here and here. A thumbprint? Of course dear boy, a thumbprint is fine! And welcome to Britain… Constable Kaunda!”
Card-Board Cop On-Duty, Ethnic Minority, of course!
[...]
It really is true that St Vincent (Caribbean Island nation) has exacting requirements for its police recruits… and it really is true that the British police require next to nothing.
And the reason for this is staggeringly ironic — Britain has drastically lowered its police entry requirements, even to the point of overlooking criminal records, in order to recruit a higher proportion of ethnic minorities. The British police now recruit immigrants who are not even British citizens, provided they have indefinite leave to remain in the UK.
We do check whether a newly arrived immigrant from Somalia or the Sudan has a criminal record relating to rape, murder or genocide, but the reality is we have absolutely no idea as to the true identity of the man in question.
With our home-grown ethnic minorities, it is important that certain criminal records are overlooked because despite making up only a purported 10% of Britain’s population, they punch well above their proportional weight when it comes to criminality, thus ensuring their admittance as 25-30% (pdf) of the prison population, whilst a full 77% of young BLACK males have been arrested for suspected criminal offences and entered into the police database.
The irony of course is that the St Vincent Police Force, with all its stringent character requirements, recruits only nationals from St Vincent, who are, quite naturally… Black.
[...]
There was a time when the British police entry standards were as high as those of St Vincent. There was a minimum height requirement, 5 “O”-educational levels were needed, criminal records were not overlooked and physical fitness was a pre-requisite. But multiculturalism and socialism have turned the traditional and decent Britain of the recent past, on its head.
A quick glance at the Metropolitan Police Authority recruitment targets for 2009-10 reveals the liberal insanity that has taken over this now pitiful Island nation. A full 27% of all new police recruits MUST be “Black and minority ethnic” (B.M.E.)…. and 41% must be female.
West Midlands Police Authority has seized upon such directives with glee. What would once have been called racial and sexual discrimination against White males is now called Positive Action, which is why the police are able to recruit Black and ethnic minorities in far higher percentage terms than their population warrants.
White males will account for a mere 30% of new Metropolitan Police recruits over the next three years, but unfortunately for the powers that be, it is still White males who overwhelmingly apply to join.
[White British citizens STILL dominate their own landscape at 90%
of the population!]
The result is that they are simply turned away, and the reason given, with no hint of hypocrisy or shame, is because they are White. In 2006, two thirds of White males were turned down for interview by Gloucester Police, whilst every single ethnic minority and female was accepted (for interview).
Looking at the police recruitment site today is profoundly depressing.
The fact that no academic qualifications are needed becomes apparent when we are told that 60% of applicants fail at the first hurdle. Such large numbers suggest perhaps that the applicants were unable to translate Homer’s Iliad into modern Greek, but this, alas, is not quite the case. The 60% of aspiring plods weeded out at stage one are discarded because they lack the ability… to fill out the application form correctly!
Should you manage to gouge out your name, address, and conviction date correctly, you may be asked to progress to the next level, where your physical fitness will be evaluated. Gone are the days of running a mile in seven minutes and doing 50 push-ups. Today you need only be “reasonably fit and able to run short distances fairly quickly.” I assume this requirement is more geared toward escape than pursuit.
The next stage is whether or not you can actually speak the language of the people you wish to police. The only requirement here is that you have mastered enough English to “Write short reports and potentially give evidence in court.”
The London Metropolitan Police do not beat around the bush in terms of identifying potential recruits. They are not looking for burly yeomen who can face up to crowds of baying, drunken youths on Saturday nights, but people who display the correct political attitudes. Providing one is aged between 18 and 57 — yes, you read 57 yrs. old correctly — then the Met Police’s number one priority in personal qualities is Respect For Diversity.
This perverse pandering to ethnic minorities does not just stop there; it continues out into the streets where ethnic criminals are given the old softly-softly approach. Stop and Search is one of those thorny ethnic issues which so excite the liberal/left, who think it “racist” to disproportionately stop young Black males in order to frisk them for knives. Black parents, on the other hand, are all in favour of it, not wishing their sons to be stabbed to death in the epidemic of knife crime UK that is overwhelmingly Black on Black.
The police have an intriguing way to get around this. They simply stop White youths — in the full knowledge they are innocent — to provide a racial balance.
They also take instruction from young “streetwise” ethnic gang members, who despite a history of carrying weapons and assaulting police officers, tell the self-same police what street slang and behaviour they should adopt in order to be as inoffensive as possible whilst searching them for weapons they use to kill one another with. The police do this in order to “command respect.”
But Blacks do not sit at the top of the grievance tree in Britain. For such an elevated position at the peak of the racial/religious ziggurat, we must turn to Islam. It is proposed that British police officers should learn about Sharia law and the Koran, in order to better police the Islamic community.
Only because it is incumbent upon the police to further the relationship with those who wish to blow us up, and take our country over. Particularly with regard to “moderate Muslims” who have such a “hard time” living in democratic Britain, they are apparently forced to think of the police as their enemy.
[...]
Can it get any worse? Of course it can! How about dressing up”English” policewomen in full-on Muslim garb to better understand the utter hell that is the life of Muslim women living in “intolerant” Britain?
[...]
Members of a police force who could not swim would have been unthinkable a few years ago, but not so today, where it is easier to drop the swimming requirement from police training rather than appear discriminatory toward swathed sinkers.
As always though, there are consequences to such liberal perversities — witness the death by drowning of ten-year-old Jordan Lyon in 2007, whilst a police community support officer (PCSO)observed from the banksof the pond as he/she consulted their health and safety pamphlet, whilst a colleague ran to summon help. (True story!)
[...]
Another consequence unforeseen only by the liberal/leftists, is not just the sheer uselessness of people recruited from the bottom of the barrel, but also their slightly less than honest attitudes. In 2006, the Guardian reported on an internal London Metropolitan Police report which found complaints of corruption aimed at “Asian” officers to be ten times (10x) higher than complaints against their White colleagues.
Amongst the PCSOs, who were introduced to tackle anti-social crime whilst bolstering the recruitment rates of Blacks, Muslims, women and the transgendered…… gross misconduct cases account for 50% all cases within the forces, despite their making up only 20% of the recruits. They are employed ONLY to make up ethnic and minority numbers. In terms of crime fighting, they solve only one crime every four years and issue fines for anti-social behaviour at the rate of 1.5 per year.
And while the British police self-destruct in order to prove their non-racist credentials, their entire institution is still awash with cries of “racism” and “prejudice.”
Take the case of Assistant Chief ConstableAnil Patani, for example. When he was overlooked for promotion back in his sergeant days, he sued for racial discrimination. When he was promoted later in his career, he sued again, this time because he had been over-promoted because of his race, and was thus viewed with some bitterness by his colleagues who of course no longer liked him, indeed hated him.
Anil Patani’s finest moment came when he tried to prosecute Channel Four (T.V.) for inciting racial hatred by daring to produce and broadcast the “Undercover Mosques” programme.
Commander Ali Dizaei was once destined for the very top. Today, he is suspended under an impending charge of Perverting the Course of Justice. Dizaei’s whole career has been built around race.
He was President of the National Black Police Association, and race-advisor to the Home Secretary (does not race-advisor to Adolf Hitler sound more appropriate?) before his life became embroiled around corruption charges.
In 2008 Britain’s most senior Muslim officer, Assistant CommissionerTarique Ghaffur, sued his boss and Britain’s most senior police officer, Commissioner Ian Blair, over racism charges. Ghaffur was paid out and Sir Ian Blair resigned shortly afterwards. In the fallout that followed, the National Black Police Association (is there a White Police Association??) took out full page adverts in newspapers, asking that ethnic minorities cease applying to join the police.
The result of such insanity is that the police now manage a mere 6 hours a week actually out on their beat. They have effectively withdrawn from the streets, which have been taken over by lawless feral youths.
[...]
The tragic case of Fiona Pilkington is the saddest story I have read in many years.
A slightly backward mother, with variously backward children, poor Mrs Pilkington lacked the financial resources to live where liberal progressives live, and so was forced to share her life with the welfare-benefit classes whose morality has been destroyed by years of liberal progressive destruction.
Stones and bricks were thrown through her windows, and fireworks pushed through her letter box. Her young son was locked in a garden shed and threatened at knife-point while her daughter was subjected to verbal and physical abuse.
Poor, tormented, mentally tortured Fiona Pilkington called the Leicestershire Police 33 times over a ten-year period, but they never helped her. Not once.
Eventually she bundled her daughter and herself into her own vandalised family car, set fire to it, and departed to a place where one can only hope her tacit murderers will never gain admission, via its pearly gates.
[...]
Contrast this with another story published the same week. 71-year-old, disabled, German-born pensioner Renate Bowling was arrested, thrown into the back of a police van and prosecuted for assault. Why?
Because she had prodded a 17-year-old youth in the chest after he and his gang had thrown stones at her windows. When she caught him hiding behind a wall he called her a “f***ing German”, which one would have thought constituted a racial offence, and certainly would if Germans were not quite so annoyingly White and Aryan. The culprit was not arrested, of course.
Or what about the pensioner arrested for shouting at yobs who were stoning ducks on a canal…. or the retired military police officer who has erected an electrified fence around his home after police ignored his 999 calls as paving slabs were hurled into his garden….. or the woman advised by the police not to call them again as it would only escalate the problem despite the fact she had been punched to the floor of her own home by a gang of (ethnic?) youths?
And on and on and on.
It is unusual to get to the end of one day, let alone an entire week, without reading reports of women being assaulted, men being beaten to death by packs of liberally educated “youths”,…..and then innocents of the wrong race (White), religion or class being arrested by the police on matters of utter inconsequence.
[...]
The reason for the decline of the British copper is very simple. Britain’s socialist government has converted — under the cover of multicultural compassion — what was once the Great British Police Force into one that is useless when it comes to protecting law abiding tax-payers, but highly efficient as the virtual paramilitary wing of a political movement which has ordained indigenous White and middle-class citizens to be the enemies of the socialist state.
If you think that such a statement is paranoid, ask yourself why the police will not get involved in cases such as Fiona Pilkington’s, but speed to cases on full blues and twos when a religious, racial, gender, or class crime has been committed.
Ask yourself this. Why do the police only seem to take the type of crime seriously that the socialist government promotes as serious, and why so many of the Chief Constables (all of whom owe their positions to a slavish devotion to the Labour Party) have degrees in criminology and sociology which promote criminals as “victims” of social injustice.
[...]
The much-traduced British police are now protectors of the multicultural/socialist state rather than the protectors of the law-abiding general public.
If you are a member of the ruling elite, the police are not only your political servants, but also your personal bodyguards.
If, on the other hand, you are a member of the increasingly persecuted class, by which I mean traditionally WHITE British, irrelevant of income or education, then the police have at best abandoned you, or at worst become your enemy. -Source-
IMMIGRATION into Britain may now never be stopped, or even controlled because the politicians are the only people who can pass laws on the subject, but have lost too much power and influence.
In The New Élites – George Walden maintains that Britain is now in a Soviet-type grip of professional egalitarians whose power base lies in commerce, culture and the media. They can now control virtually all of public life. They are extremely mediocre in their abilities, and indeed brag about their ordinariness, but behind their anti-elitist rhetoric lies the old urge to dominate which is as powerful as that of their aristocratic forebears.
[...]
As Walden points out, the élites have always dominated mass societies, and there is a large academic literature on the subject. But in the past there was always a struggle between competing élites with opposing ideas. Britain’s new élites, are instead… virtually totalitarian.
No politicians of any party would now dare to openly propose to withdraw from the Geneva Refugee Convention, which has outlived its usefulness and is actually harming this country because the new élites would shout them down.
Further, the executive branch, in particular the immigration authorities, can do nothing to halt immigration unless there is a change of law initiated by the politicians. Lawyers in the immigration appellate system which is now a growing and monolithic money-spinner for many of them, have to tolerate perjury in court by illegal immigrants – whom they know to be lying – and having refused them asylum, still allow them to stay in Britain because they know that the authorities are simply incapable of removing them in the numbers required.
Decline in standards
The greatest present danger is the decline in journalistic standards, which the new élites have brought about. In earlier times, news reporters were taught not to comment in their copy and be balanced and fair-minded. Not any more.
The present mix of spin, personally biased opinion, public relations chat and celebrity gossip – often all crammed into one article – is now demanded of journalists by their paymasters. In the process they have resorted to lies and half-lies because they know they can get away with them if they express left-liberal opinions. They continually use pejorative adjectives when it comes to describing the Right – again because it is expected of them. Indeed they fear for their jobs if they fail in this regard. They are no longer journalists but Soviet-type propagandists. This is why the Right is always termed ‘extreme’, but never the Left.
Journalists’ names for parties
Journalists will often describe parties such as the BNP (British Nationalist Party), or Austria’s Freedom Party, as ‘anti-immigrant’ but will not conversely report other parties being ‘pro-immigrant’. They will increasingly point to the unpleasant consequences of race riots in Britain, but will not point to their cause: unbridled immigration.
They will sometimes approve of attempts to remove illegal immigrants, but are only too ready to publish pictures of weeping immigrant children and their mothers being forced onto ships and planes against their will, because their editors demand a more sentimental and ‘caring’ approach to news stories.
By using Non-neutral language, they print glaring paradoxes. An article in the national press that describes an immigrant borough as ‘vibrant’, or one which ‘celebrates diversity’, will be printed alongside stories about tribal butchery in Africa or communal murders in India.
Journalists were once cautioned about using non-sequiturs - stating facts but drawing incorrect conclusions from them. A classic non-sequitur says that ‘anti-immigration’ parties promote ‘hate’ because, as most immigrants are coloured (NON-white), White nationalist parties must therefore “hate coloured people” everywhere in the world. What is a legitimate criticism of an immigration policy, becomes instead, a personal attack on individual Black people in Britain. They pretend not to see the difference between one stance and another.
They write emotively and unthinkingly, and seem fearful and confused. Any talk of controlling immigration will stir up trouble in immigrant communities, so they maintain. They assume that ethnic minorities themselves want immigration to continue ad infinitum, so they avoid publishing criticism of immigration policies for fear of giving offence – offence to the ethnic minorities… NOT to the British host population.
This is partly because they appear not to know what being British is. They have gratuitously redefined Britain as some kind of off-shore Hong Kong, without reference to what the general public, academics and even the politicians themselves believe to be the true reality. Virtually none of the intellectuals who are supposed to be monitoring British society will use the term ‘multi-culturalism’ – a euphemism for multi-racialism.
[...]
The truth is that the growing cultural and linguistic chaos in this country, which the media élite gloss over, adversely impacts upon the immigrants themselves. It is they who are ‘multi-cultural’, not we. The Jamaicans looking like Africans, are now having to live in London streets side by side with real Africans, and the Whites can’t tell the difference.
Anglo-Indians are now having to rub shoulders with other Indians belonging to castes they would not normally wish to live next to… if they were back in India. There is even less ‘multi-culturalism’ going on between Blacks and Browns. Their one common denominator was the Commonwealth, but now all the talk is about ‘Europe’, and immigrants are no more European than they are British.
What is often forgotten is the vast architectural heritage into which the immigrants have come. Each street, borough and town in Britain was built by the British. Each, with just a tiny few exceptions, is named after local history, a history of the British.
This is bound to affect the self-esteem of the minorities: everyone wants to have a homeland they can call their own, and have a pride in their own culture and achievements. You can’t expect diasporas to have a pride in someone else’s culture or history.
America was deliberately created as a receptacle for diasporas, and the new in-comers could then create a new pride in ‘America’ (which was named not after a racial group but after an immigrant called Amerigo).
Our increasing multi-racialism will itself become a kind of self-imposed tyranny, and in the end our institutions will be utterly unreformable.
One of the great ironies of our time is that Eastern Europe, since the collapse of communism, is now freer than the West. Today it is in the West that criticism of racial or historical dogma can end the career of a scholar or politician, and even send him to prison. By contrast, in Eastern Europe and Russia, now the last enclaves of free White people, one can find plenty of books about race or historical revisionism. -Source-
How do we explain the phenomenon of ‘young white trash‘ imitating Black gangs (in Britain’s recent riots)?
“Well, the answer is simple and can be clearly identified by the reaction of the police, the media and the government to the riots. What was the reaction? It was to:
(1) leave the Blacks to riot, loot and burn;
(2) crack down hard on any Whites who dared to share their faces to defend themselves and their property e.g. Enfield (1000 police vs 200 Whites was one example);
(3) praise gangs of Sikhs and other Asians who gathered to fight any rioters and carried swords and other weapons to do so — their photographs appeared all over the place, and articles were written comparing them favourably over the Whites (they know how to handle the rioters better than we do – and there was even an article in the DT saying that immigrants love this country more than we do);
(4) minimize the involvement of Blacks in the rioting (the BBC were particularly bad at this);
(5) maximize the involvement of Whites (the BBC again – but pretty much all the other media as well);
(6) interview as many Blackvictims, shopkeepers and community leaders as possible (the politicians in particular did this).
I could go on but you get the point.
What all this indicates is a culture which has existed for decades now — that of excusing almost anything non-whites (Blacks, Muslims and other immigrants) do – even including burning and looting our cities – where they get preferential treatment in (apparently) practically every walk of life. This culture is enshrined in law and rigorously enforced by the courts.
In fact, the more violent and intolerant the Blacks and other minorities become, the more money we throw at them. The more we try to ‘understand‘ them, the more ‘inter-community harmony groups‘ we help establish for them, and then more “advisers” are appointed in our government, councils, police and so forth.
There is no doubt about it; WHITES are treated as an underclass in their own country.
Is it any surprise that uneducated White youths look at all this and see everyone (from the media, to the government, to the courts, etc.) almost KISSING THE ARSES OF IMMIGRANTS (excuse the language but we must be honest about this,) and conclude that the obvious thing is to almost become an immigrant themselves to receive such lavish government attention, plus generous monetary rewards.
And there you have it. If you want to solve these problems the answer is simple. DON’T TREAT THE INDIGENOUS WHITE PEOPLE AS AN UNDERCLASS (in their own country). You have stolen their self-respect. I suggest that you give it back to them.
You (the government, the media and so on) can stick that in your ‘consultation exercise‘ pipe and smoke it.” -Source-
Although the politicians are filled with faux horror at the chaos of the past week, I can’t help but think that this may have been a good week for these power-hungry predators. The calls being made are not those which would actually fix the problem, they are exactly those things which will make it worse.
They are saying that the police would have the power to close ‘social media’ or the Blackberry Messenger Service when they ‘need’ it,…. o.k., can you see the potential for abuse here? What happens if there are actual demonstrations against this government… will they close down Twitter and Facebook for it? Is this not what happened in Egypt in January and was condemned by the same politicos who are now suggesting this?
One thing about the past week that I found encouraging was the vigilante groups that formed in Enfield, and the other one in south London that was led by the EDL. They were patrolling their areas, preventing yobs from doing damage to their areas, their homes and their businesses.
Both of these white vigilante groups were condemned by the elites, and hateful slander was spread by the MSM (mainstream media), calling these groups ‘racist’. So I wonder…. is it worse to be racist or a looter? Well, it seems we already know the answer to that,…. thank you, Guardian!
Asians also came together to form vigilante groups, the Sikhs of Southall, the Turks of Haringey and the Muslims of Birmingham, but it seems that they are ok. According to the vile MSM, it is only when whites try to defend what is theirs, that it becomes a concern!
But I digress, the point is, it was good to see people doing something for themselves, doing something without having to wait for officialdom to allow them or waiting to get a licence (often against the wishes of the police, who seem to prefer that we allow gangs of hoodlums run amok, rather than seeing locals doing what the police should be doing!)
When the establishment has lost control, as happened this week, it was locals getting together and policing their areas that may have prevented mass looting in those areas, and perhaps had an effect on the duration of the riots. It is one thing to loot when one knows that one will not be stopped, it is something to think about when one knows the locals are waiting for one with baseball bats!
The establishment seems united in condemning this vigilantism, they seem to suggest that only the police, even if they don’t bother turning up, should be the only group that deals with criminals! Why is this? What possible problem can they foresee with these vigilante groups? It is true that they could get carried away if they caught a looter, but then, so what? They are not trained for riots, well yes, but then the police have not been all that effective this week either. I think the real reason for this disgust, is that the elites are horrified that the plebs are doing something for themselves.
This reminds the elites that the very same thing could happen to them, and seeing the economic carnage that has taken place this week, that could possibly not be too far away. They fear their own people, not the Sikhs or the Muslims or the Turks – they can be easily managed — but they fear the men of England, they fear them due to their own treason. The English are the real threat to their power, and if the English realise that they can band together and be a force, whether for good or ill, that could be the seeds of the downfall of our corrupt elites. >to Full Report
Enoch Powell - Former Member of Parliament in 1987
By Irish Savant
As England burns, let’s reflect on some warnings that Enoch Powell provided to us over forty (40) years ago (April, 1968).
“As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding. Like the Roman, I seem to see “the River Tiber foaming with much blood”.
That tragic and intractable phenomenon which we watch with horror on the other side of the Atlantic (U.S. race riots) but which there is interwoven with the history and existence of the States itself…. is coming upon us here, by our own volition and our own neglect. Indeed, it has all but come. In numerical terms, it will be of American proportions long before the end of the (20th) century.”
He then gave a picture of what the average Briton would face by the end of the (20th) century.
For reasons which they could not comprehend, and in pursuance of a decision by default, on which they were never consulted, they found themselves made strangers in their own country. They found their wives unable to obtain hospital beds in childbirth, their children unable to obtain school places, their homes and neighbourhoods changed beyond recognition, their plans and prospects for the future defeated; at work they found that employers hesitated to apply to the immigrant worker the standards of discipline and competence required of the native-born worker; they began to hear, as time went by, more and more voices which told them that they were now the unwanted.
“On top of this, they now learn that a one-way privilege is to be established by Act of Parliament; a law which cannot, and is not intended to, operate to protect them or redress their grievances, is to be enacted to give the stranger, the disgruntled and the agent provocateur the power to pillory them for their private actions.”
The net effect would be a “total transformation to which there is no parallel in a thousand years of English history”
Enoch Powell was simply trying to protect this 1968 scene, Carnaby Street, London from falling into the degenerative episodes as seen in the video below.
For this stunning perspicacity and honesty he was threatened with prosecution and hounded out of his Cabinet position. His career was finished. Long-standing friends abandoned him. The ‘conservative’ London Times described his words as ‘an evil speech’ calculated to ‘inflame racial passions’.
Compare what Powell said with the drivel the multi-cult establishment fed us. We all live together happily in a magic kumbaya land. Tell that to the terrified residents of North London and elsewhere.
Fittingly, I’ll leave the final words to the great man himself.
“We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependents, who are for the most part, the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre.”
I have just returned to London, where I have lived since I was 11 yrs. old.
I have been away for four years, living as an ethnic minority in a monocultural part of the world, amassing a host of stories to tell disbelieving friends. On the whole, I am glad to return.
I shan’t miss some locals’ assumptions that, being a white woman, if I was outside after dark and usually to walk the few metres between my house and the church, (that) I must be a prostitute eager to give them a blow job. I shan’t miss the abuse my priest husband received: the daubing of “Dirty white dogs” in red paint on the church door, the barrage of stones thrown at him by children shouting “Satan”.
He was called a “f***ing white bastard” more than once, though, notably, never when in a cassock. I will also not miss the way our garden acted as the local rubbish dump, with items ranging from duvets and TV sets, to rats (dead or twitching) glued to cardboard strips, a popular local method of vermin control to stem the large numbers of them which scuttled between the rubbish piled in gardens and on pavements.
Yes, I am very glad to have left (Birmingham),Britain’s second largest city.
For four years, we lived in inner-city Birmingham, in what has been a police no-go area for 20 years. We know that because some plain-clothed cops told us when they asked to use our vicarage as a stake-out to bust drugs rings that pervade the area. Having heard a parishioner’s tales of what his (Muslim) neighbours did to him, when he was wrongfully suspected of having grassed up a cock-fighting ring –we refused– explaining that we had to live here, they didn’t.
Even during this time we saw the area change. When we arrived, the population was predominantly Pakistani. Now, Somalis are there in equal numbers. Most of the run-down Irish pubs were turned into mosques during our time.
As a woman, it was difficult for me to gain many first-hand impressions of the Muslims. I was generally ignored by both men and women, and on the rare occasion that I had to interact, when for example a car was parked illegally and blocking my gate, I was addressed as if inconsequential.
[...]
When my husband mentioned the “dirty white dogs” graffiti to a local Muslim, the response was, “One of your people did it.”
I have to say that the police response was no better when the local Methodists complained about the same thing. They chose not to believe it had happened, since we had removed all sign of it with the buckets of anti-graffiti chemicals we had stocked since we arrived. They (police) asked, somewhat pathetically: “Are you sure it was racist?”
To a London reader, born and bred with multiculturalism, I know that my stories may come across as outlandish and exaggerated, and that I must surely be a (British National Party) BNP voter — I have observed people’s expressions as they have listened to my tales of life in Brum.
[...]
The Muslim community in Birmingham, for instance, is made up of people from many continents and races, including Afghans, Yemenis, Pakistanis, Indians and Somalis.
There is no doubt in my mind that we need to have the same openness in discussing what is happening to many cities in Britain. If current demographic trends continue over the next few decades, the West Midlands, as well as other parts of the country, will become a predominantly Muslim area.
[...]
It is time to rub the rime from our eyes and to look clearly at the shape of Britain today. Everyone living here needs to be able to talk about what they see, without the lazy or fearful, but certainly paralysing, accusation of racism. …to Full Article
United Nations, Human Rights Charter, Article 19 states: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”
[Most people] “confuse the dreary recitation of politically correct gibberish with sensitivity that they think they have arrived at through their own value clarification”. –Tomislav Sunic
"Rather than love, than money, than fame, give me TRUTH." — Henry David Thoreau
"Happiness is not the goal of existence, but the byproduct of a life well lived and the purpose of life is TRUTH... not pleasure".
"For most people, the desire not to deviate too far from the herd, prevents them from telling the truth they really feel inside. What would the neighbors think?" -- John Kaminski
Current Weather
~~~~~ ELLIOT LAKE NEWS & VIEWS is a Blog helping to slay the many-headed dragon of "political correctness" with the effective weapon called TRUTH.
Subjects pertaining to mass 3rd-world immigration, multi-culturalism and racial identity are are given special priorities here, and from which material you may either accept or reject at your personal discretion.
Opinions are accepted without ad hominem attacks or insults. Personal responses to any commentary or questions will be kept to a bare minimum due to time constraints.
Miscellaneous
> All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed.
Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer
German philosopher (1788 -1860)
The truth that makes men free is for the most part the truth which men prefer not to hear.
“In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” -Orwell
To get the oil price, please enable Javascript.
Can it get any worse? Of course it can! How about dressing up”English” policewomen in full-on Muslim garb to better understand the utter hell that is the life of Muslim women living in “intolerant” Britain?
![[Most Recent Charts from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_usoz_4.gif)
