I have in front of me an article, dated August 15th to Sept. 15th, 2011 in the AWAJ newspaper published in English — a small free newspaper distributed in Montreal, Quebec.
The author’s name is Dr. R. Raashed, M.A., Ph.D in law from Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia. Dr. Raashed is described as the Director of Islamic Information Services for Australia.
Dr. Raashed says:
“Muslim is an adjective of Islam. Hence there can be no Muslim without Islam. The bottom line is a Muslim can NEVER be a SECULAR.’ … (secularism) ‘represents a great challenge to the national identity of Muslims…”
It specifically discusses a recent secular alteration to the constitution of Bangladesh. Dr. Raashed says:
“The deliberate removal of ‘Trust in God’ from the constitution of Bangladesh, put the current Awami government in a head-on collision course with the Qur’An. Hence, the government is necessarily at an ideological WAR with the believers in this ‘Only Book that contains No Doubt’.”
Dr. Raashed says, “No matter who devised it — now that such a MAJOR CRIME has been committed by the current government — it is an Islamic obligation on every serious believer to reverse it AT ANY COST. Come what may, the Qu’ran (Koran) will come out victorious. Removal of the accomplice government from office… is the first remedy.”
Now – if SECULARISM is “a MAJOR CRIME” for Muslims, and “a great challenge to the national identity of Muslims” (and I think we must understand “national” here to mean the body of the Muslim people, not merely a geographic territory where the PEOPLE itself is the resident NATION), then:
[a] how can Muslims comply and realistically be ASKED to comply with secular LAWS in any country?
Dr. Raashed also identifies secularism as atheism:
“Sec·u·lar·ism [sek-yuh-luh-riz-uhm], noun, is defined as:
1. secular spirit or tendency, especially a system of political or social philosophy that rejects all forms of religious faith and worship.
2. the view that public education and other matters of civil policy should be conducted without the introduction of a religious element.”
[b] How can Muslims NOT view our secular governments as authors of CRIMES against Islam?
[c] How can they therefore NOT — by command of their religion – seek the overthrow of OUR governments by any means, whether overtly, or by stealth, when we foolishly invite them to reside on OUR OWN SOIL?
(As a case in point, Muslims are currently threatening the Royal Palace in UK.)
[d] There clearly can be no such thing as multiculturalism for Islam (there can be none for the West, either… let’s get real);
There can be NO SUCH THING as Muslim adherence to the laws of a non-Islamic government… period.
Muslims don’t acknowledge the authority of such governments. So why is the West deceiving itself that such a thing is possible? Are Western countries blind, deaf, dumb and suicidal?
There is NO REMOTE POSSIBILITY of mutual tolerance on the same soil.
While we are busy self-righteously tolerating THEM – perhaps to show them just how wonderful we are, so they will want to be just like us — they are busy planning to overthrow our governments because they necessarily (unless we’re idiots) see themselves in an ideological WAR with OUR Western culture.
What they have done in the United Kingdom in publicly calling for the overthrow of the royal Palace — as in Constitutional law — is described as HIGH TREASON — as any such threatened overthrow “compasses the death of the Sovereign.”
One, or the other has to go!
It’s either Islam or western culture/government. If on Western soil, the choice had better be Islam, and FAST… unless we want our little granddaughters growing up to wear the Burkha and trained to view their own ancestors as “infidels“.
HABEAS CORPUS CANADA
The Official Legal Challenge
To North American Union
(My websites are being systematically hacked, including by my Denver-based registrar, domainsite.com, which took all my HCC domains off-line weeks ago. They’re refusing to restore them, although they are all paid up and in good standing. Here are two backups:)
Plus a Blog exposing the Quebec “secession” scam: http://habeascorpuscanadacomments.blogspot.com
- The Dhimmi is Forbidden to Read the Koran (counterjihadreport.com)
- 70% of American Muslims Say Us Should Impose Sharia: Legalized Polygamy (gunnyg.wordpress.com)
- The Case for Banning Sharia Law in America (creepingsharia.wordpress.com)
- History of the Muslim Brotherhood Penetration of the U.S. Government (creepingsharia.wordpress.com)