ELLIOT LAKE News

Political INcorrect Constructs Arranged To Awaken Slumbering Minds…

No, America Is Not a Great Nation

Originally posted on saboteur365:

blackflag

Thoughts on America, penned by blogger Matt Walsh.

Excerpt from The Blaze

Here’s the truth: I am not happy with this country, and you shouldn’t be, either. I am disappointed in it. It disgraces itself. It turns from God. It kills its young. It attacks the family. Am I supposed to pretend otherwise just for the sake of being festive? While Michelle Obama felt pride in her nation for the first time recently, I am more and more developing a deep anger at it, and I think it’s time I admit that out loud. I’m a patriot, but to borrow from Chesterton, a patriot who is uncritical of his country while it teeters on the edge of total destruction is like a son who doesn’t warn his mother that she’s about to fall off a cliff. In this case, however, we already fell off the cliff. We are shattered on…

View original 690 more words

Legitimate Americans complicit in the destruction of the United States

Originally posted on Pragmatic Witness:

Since the September 11, 2001 attack by the United States and Israel there is no reason why every legal adult American does not know the truth about this country.

The very next day underground journalists like Christopher Bollyn of Spotlight Magazine were writing that it was a terrorist attack by the Israeli Mossad with the complicity of the United States government.

And there were ordinary Americans that already knew the truth about what was happening in the nation long before the 9/11 attack.  Why did not one of you act to stop the evil you apparently saw happening in plain sight?  That’s a question I would love to have answered.

Unfortunately, I did not become wise to the conspiracy until around 2003, which I’ve mentioned in former essays.  But when I began educating myself I could not believe that Americans much older and wiser were not acting to remove the…

View original 893 more words

Why are Jewish groups “scampering” to save Muslim refugees?

Originally posted on Refugee Resettlement Watch:

Good question isn’t it!  It is a question I’ve wondered about for 8 years, ever since I first heard of HIAS and Muslim refugees.

Hetfield_Mark_lg President and CEO of HIAS, Mark Hetfield, pulls down a salary and related income package of about $300,000 a year to save Muslim refugees among others.

But, now that I know more, it is not too complicated to answer—they are doing it because they are politically-correct hard Leftists working to change America, and they are doing it for the money they receive from the US taxpayer to resettle Muslims in America.

I’m speaking specifically here of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS), one of the groups mentioned in this editorial in the Jewish Voice entitled:HIAS & ADL Spend Jewish $$ to Bring Muslims to the US?

Regular readers know that HIAS is one ofnine major federal resettlement contractors colonizing and changing your towns…

View original 465 more words

Norwegian, Danish Ships Rescue 1,000 African Invading Migrants in Mediterranean

Originally posted on saboteur365:

sicily

Distance between Tripoli and Sicily is 520.24 km. This distance is equal to 323.26 miles, and 280.72 nautical miles.

The white man’s survival instincts are failing him when he refuses to repel the invader from Africa, who comes to parasite off him, steal his women, and eventually drown him in a sea of black genes.

Options for repelling the invader range from harsh to humane, but taking the primitive African into the bosom of white civilization is insanity. Any other option is better than rewarding the illegal migrant with a permanent free ride in the West.

Excerpt from Associated Press

COPENHAGEN, Denmark (AP) — Ships from Norway and Denmark have picked up nearly 1,000 migrants from small boats off the coast of Libya in the past 24 hours.

Svein Kvalavaag, the captain of the Norwegian Siem Pilot vessel, said on Monday he picked up 671 from two wooden boats north…

View original 144 more words

Feminisim’s Negative Consequences

What Feminism has done:

1. It has made men less likely to get a job as a cop or fireman. Despite being bigger, stronger and more capable of dealing with physical threats, employment-equity (affirmative action) requires that less capable women are hired before men. I am especially comforted by the ones who are 5’ 2’’, 130 lbs with painted nails and mascara. I’ve seen several of them. They make me feel so safe.

(Also see: Toronto Police Losing “Face”)

2. It has given teenage girls reproductive freedom and sexual equality to males. As a result, our society is rampant with single baby-mothers, my children’s school is full of troubled children who grow up deprived of a father’s guidance, and our jails are full of angry, fatherless young criminal men.

3. It has made me appreciate my stay-at-home mom-wife 1000% more. I see my buddies rush to make breakfast and deliver the kids to daycare everyday. I hear about how their working wives are too tired to have sex. I watch their kids dine on take-out food and get fat as they live their lives deprived of wholesome home-cooked meals because mommy has to stay at work late to write a report.

4. It has allowed me to wait longer for medical care. There are only so many places available in medical school and over 50% of all doctors graduating these days are female. Female doctors work considerably fewer hours than their male counterparts. And unlike men, they take time off when having children. Therefore, they see fewer patients. I cannot count the number of people who have mentioned to me how little their female doctors work.

5. It has picked my pocket dry with its endless demands for more tax dollars to fund government programs like state-funded daycare that would not be necessary if they just took motherhood more seriously than their own selfish feminist ambitions.

6. It has deprived the world of millions of intelligent children. Intelligence is largely genetic. Many of today’s brightest women are not having children, choosing instead to pursue careers. This has deprived humanity and future generations of their DNA.

Don’t roll your eyes at me. I am not saying that everyone — men and women alike — should not be able to pursue their own private ambitions. And sure … some women cops could take on a man in a physical confrontation, some women doctors work as much as male doctors, and some women do have careers with no negative impact on their motherly duties. But most do not.

Books, magazines, TV, and radio are constantly awash with stories of exhausted, conflicted women trying to do it all. Childless career women are apparently the most conflicted of all. In fact, an entire psychiatric industry has grown up around these feminist-caused problems.

What I am simply trying to do here is point out the unintended negative consequences of feminism on men in particular, and society as a whole. With every action there is an equal and opposite…well, you know. […]  Source

Also:

Feminist Dupes

Radical Feminists Are Useful Idiots

Commie Plan For American Women

***************************************

Feminism Has COMMUNIST Roots

Fred On Everything

Are White Men Gods? (II): Getting the Facts Straight

I find Cornel West, a black professor, complaining of White Supremacy, which he believes our black President needs to remedy.  Obama, he says, is “n*ggerized.”

A n*ggerized black person is a black person who is afraid and scared and intimidated when it comes to putting a spotlight on white supremacy and fighting against white supremacy,” West said.

I would like to explain to Professor West a few things about this dread “supremacy”:

We have White Supremacy, Professor… because, for 2500 years, we Whites, have produced the best minds on the planet, the greatest flourishing of the arts and sciences ever seen, the most complex and organized societies. We have “White Supremacy” — whatever exactly it may be — because we have been the earth’s most successful race. No other has come close. Deal with it.

We put probes on (planet) Mars and invented the thousands of technologies needed to do it. We developed the symphony orchestra, the highest form of musical expression. We invented the airplane, the computer, the Internet… and tennis shoes. Putting it compactly, we invented the modern world. A degree of privilege — however you may conceive it — goes with the territory.

Space Shuttle

A product of WHITE engineers. When you can do this, come back and talk to me.

Blacks may not have the background to grasp the extent of our achievements. Still, permit me a brief and very incomplete list of things White people have done or invented:

Euclidean geometry. Parabolic geometry. Hyperbolic geometry. Projective geometry. Differential geometry. Calculus: Limits, continuity, differentiation, integration. Physical chemistry. Organic chemistry. Biochemistry. Classical mechanics. The indeterminacy principle. The wave equation. The Parthenon. The Anabasis. Air conditioning. Number theory. Romanesque architecture. Gothic architecture. Information theory. Entropy. Enthalpy. Every symphony ever written. Pierre Auguste Renoir. The twelve-tone scale. The mathematics behind it, twelfth root of two and all that. S-p hybrid bonding orbitals. The Bohr-Sommerfeld atom. The purine-pyrimidine structure of the DNA ladder. Single-sideband radio. All other radio. Dentistry. The internal-combustion engine. Turbojets. Turbofans. Doppler beam-sharpening. Penicillin. Airplanes. Surgery. The mammogram. The Pill. The condom. Polio vaccine. The integrated circuit. The computer. Football. Computational fluid dynamics. Tensors. The Constitution. Euripides, Sophocles, Aristophanes, Aeschylus, Homer, Hesiod. Glass. Rubber. Nylon. Roads. Buildings. Elvis. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. (OK, that’s nerve gas, and maybe we didn’t really need it.) Silicone. The automobile. Really weird stuff, like clathrates, Buckyballs, and rotaxanes. The Bible. Bug spray. Diffie-Hellman, public-key cryptography, and RSA. Et cetera.

Computers

Computers, invented by us. We are not the only ones who can design these monsters. The Japanese, Chinese, Koreans, and Indians can do it, and they have my respect. But–Babbage, Turing, Shockley, Shannon, Boole, von Neumannwe invented computers. People who count on their fingers should maintain a discreet silence.

As a race, Cornel, we are happy  for you, for anyone, to enjoy the benefits of our civilization, but that is exactly what it is—our civilization. It has become a global civilization because others among the competent—again, Chinese, Japanese, Indians, Koreans—have found it to be in technical matters superior. It came from us. They — I note — do not complain of “White Supremacy” or “White Privilege”. They are too busy making computers and money.

Guilt-ridden White Woman foolishly prostrating before a black man and begging forgiveness for slavery of his people.
White woman begging for forgiveness for slavery

Now,  Cornel, I have often heard blacks demanding reparations for slavery. All right. I agree. It is only fair.  I will pay a half-million dollars to each of my slaves, and free them immediately.  I am not sure how many I have, but will try to give you an estimate in even dozens. Further, I believe that all blacks are entitled to a similar amount for every year in which they were slaves.

However,  I think you owe us royalties for the use of our civilization, which can be regarded as a sort of software. There should be a licensing fee. After all, every time you use a computer, or a door knob, you are using something invented by us. Every time you sharpen a pencil, or use one, or read or write, you infringe our copyright … so to speak. We have spent millennia coming up with things–literacy, soap, counting–and it is only fair that we receive recompense.

The accounting burden would be excessive if we tried to distribute royalties in too fine a granularity, such as three cents per use of a boom-box, or a Glock (handgun), so we should probably use a bundled approach–so much per year for use of the wheel, refrigerator, and television. The amount could be deducted first from reparations payments and then automatically from EFT cards.

Gothic

A White man’s kraal. We started building them around the year 1137.

Now, Cornel, it isn’t that we Whites want to be “supreme”. It is just that we haven’t been able to help it. It isn’t our fault that we produced Newton, Archimedes, Einstein, and all those mutants. They are just birth effects … things that happen to even, the best families. You have to play the hand you are dealt. A little sympathy would be appropriate.

Hardly distinguishable from the Tang Dynasty

 These gentlemen, hardly distinguishable from the Julio-Claudians, are probably from Papua-New Guinea. I propose to give them a trial subscription to White Supremacist culture.

An essentially identical culture, differing only in unimportant details (Mission Control)

An essentially identical culture, differing only in detail. (NASA Mission Control)

What I think, Cornel, is that if you want the advantages of success, you have to succeed. We have. It is chic to say  that Whites are now headed for the dust bin of history. Maybe. If so, historians of the future will say, “Damn! That was some really fine dust, wasn’t it?”   >Source  (For added emphasis, underlined, bolded words and links by ELN Editor)

Also:

I Am NOT Sorry!

I Am a WHITE Man

http://tomatobubble.com/wonderfulrace1.html

(Part 2)     http://tomatobubble.com/wonderfulrace2.html

“White Guilt” Is NOT Necessary

 By Sarah, Maid of Albion

One of the many weapons our opponents use against us, and also against others of European ancestry, is often termed historical “white guilt”. Those who hate us often point accusingly to our Empire, and to our involvement in the transatlantic slave trade with the implication that we, particularly the British and European Americans, are uniquely guilty of crimes against other races. They believe that — by making us feel guilty about our past — we will be less inclined to object to what is done to us on behalf of our alleged victims.

However, as in so many areas, the truth does not suit their agenda, so they resort to their favoured tactic, and lie with the ease and practiced familiarity of an ageing harlot unzipping her client’s pants.

In our schools and on our television screens, they teach an entirely false and misleading version of history, and sadly it is one which at least two generations of our children now accept as unquestioned fact. Our empire, the greatest the world has ever known is presented as being a cruel and oppressive force which was primarily concerned with plundering other nations and exploiting their peoples.

The story they tell us about the slave trade is also a lie. It’s a lie which they use primarily against Britain and America and it is upon that lie which I will focus in this post.
Guilt-ridden WHITE Man and his son“So Sorry”, “So Sorry”
oubredwhitepathologicalaltruism
The lies and myths about slavery are told with the same cynicism as those who voted to ban hunting with hounds under the pretence that they were motivated by animal welfare “concerns”. So intent are they in presenting slavery as a White against black crime that they actively seek to play down the fact that an estimated 27 million people are living in various forms of slavery right now in the 21st Century, more than twice the number transported to America during the total transatlantic slave trade with the effect that less is done than otherwise would be to help those currently in slavery, but are an embarrassment over which a politically correct veil must be drawn.

Our enemies also misrepresent the truth about historical slavery. Transatlantic slavery did not exist in a vacuum — the slave trade was not invented by Americans or Europeans. Slavery had been part of the human condition since the earliest civilisations — look to the Torah, the Old Testament and the Koran, all of which have copious references to slavery written, a millennium or more before America was discovered, and whilst the most Europeans lived in tribes and wore woad.

The historical revisionists of the left keep trying to tell us that cradle of civilisation was in North Africa, but they forget to mention that — if it was — it was built by slaves.

Even during the few centuries in which Europe and America were involved in slavery, we were not even the main players. Slavery was being carried out throughout the world, particularly in Asia, Africa and the Middle East. The African, Arab and Asian involvement in slavery existed long before the transatlantic slave trade, and continued well after abolition, and involved far greater numbers of people.

A wrong is a wrong whoever commits it, and it is inequitable, and arguably racist, to hold one group more accountable than another on the grounds of pigmentation. I am not stating these facts in order to excuse the transatlantic slave trade, but merely to set it in context and in perspective. You can not single out one or two nations for unique condemnation, when, in truth they merely, and briefly, got involved in what almost everyone else was doing, and which other nations had been doing for thousands of years.

This is particularly inequitable given that in 1807, Britain was one of the first nations on planet earth to abolish the slave trade and then through her Empire brought about the abolition of slavery across a quarter (25%) of the earth’s surface a mere 26 years later. (a stunning achievement given that the British Empire included many lands where slavery had been a fact of life for thousands of years, and that this huge task was achieved in an age before aeroplanes, helicopters and satellite communications.)

Furthermore, throughout most of the 19th Century the Royal Navy was actively involved in combating the slave trade as perpetrated by other nations, so we enforced abolition well beyond our own dominions.

Indeed, British and other European colonialism itself, far from oppressing our subject nations, played a pivotal role in freeing them from the threat of being captured by Arab slavers, castrated (unlike in America, there are few descendants of those enslaved by Islam) and shipped to Arabia to be worked to death.

If you look to the history of Eastern Africa in the 19th Century, Britain was the major force in ending the Arab slave trade from places like Uganda, Northern Kenya and Zanzibar. We are repeatedly reminded of the slave caves around the coast of Western Africa used by transatlantic slave traders, however there are similar caves on the east of Africa from whence the cargo travelled north and east over far more centuries, and in far greater numbers.

Another point supporting the fact that European colonialism brought about the end of slavery is that the only African country where it was still legal to own slaves well into the 1920’s was Ethiopia, one of the only African nations which was never colonised and even then it was only abolished in order to gain Ethiopia access to the League of Nations.

On the other side of the Atlantic, also in 1807, the US Congress banned the importation of slaves, and 54 years later, well over half a million young, White, Americans died in a (Civil) war fought partly in order to free the slaves. I am aware of no similar gesture on the part of those Arab, Asian and African states which had owned and traded in slaves for millennia before Britain’s comparatively brief, three hundred year involvement, including those, such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Yemen, Oman and Mauritania, which didn’t get around to banning slavery until 100 years after the American Civil war (and where some would say forms of slavery continue to this day) or in Mauritania which only imposed a ban last year — or Sudan where slavery allegedly still exists.

How odd that we don’t hear calls for reparations from those countries where slaves were openly owned within living memory. Of course, silly me, they are not White European nations, and can’t be held responsible for what they do.

That said, I personally see no justification in holding current generations of Arabs or Africans responsible for the acts of earlier generations (even though those were quite recent generations). Guilt dies with the guilty, and inherited or racial guilt is an abstract and unsupportable concept, which is, at its heart racist. However, it is a guilt which we in Europe and North America are expected to carry and acknowledge, despite the fact that the guilt of our forefathers is so much less than the guilt of others, and that we have done so much more than others to right a universal wrong.

The staggeringly important fact about the slave trade is not that Britain and America joined in for a while, it is we alone brought it to an end.

Instead of suffering White-guilt over slavery — by comparison with many other nations — we British and our U.S. cousins have a great deal to be proud of.  >Source

Related:

Will Swedes become a minority in their own country?

ELN:

Great website in support of Sweden’s indigenous peoples.

Other White western nations are undergoing identical incursions of incompatible 3rd-world, NON-white peoples on a mass scale as to defy logical reasoning, yet this seemingly relentless immigrant “invasion” continues to erode the very foundations of our once-stable societies without hardly any protest. Younger readers mistakenly assume these un-welcomed events as natural occurrences because they were recently born into these times without hindsight.

“Oldsters” have the benefit of experience prior to current times and are able to distinguish the vast differences between a stable, homogenetic lifestyle with the incongruence of parasitical, 3rd-world foreigners who were recently force-fed into our body politic without our permission.

Originally posted on Swedish Surveyor:

On the 23rd of September I became intrigued when reading an article in Swedens 3rd biggest newspapers. In the article a Norwegian working with statistics was shocked that the Swedish statistics institute (SCB), were doing a poor job. I decided to do some digging and bear with me because things are going to get real interesting, real fast. It boils down to the fact that the SCB are not using the same methods as the UK, the USA,Australia, and Canada among many others.

What the forementioned countries do is measure their populations using ethnicity and/or race as variables. This sounds both discriminating, politically incorrect, and racist in Sweden but there is a good reason for using those variables which I will get to. I don’t think that Australians or Americans would consider themselves “racists” for measuring that way. An African-American is not “less worthy” than a…

View original 1,154 more words

Destroying Canadian-European Heritages

Paying For Our Own Demise: Funding “Multicult” Canada

By Brad Salzberg

In 1988, multiculturalism in Canada officially became government policy. This was the year the policy became entrenched in our constitution, thereby completing a seventeen- year- long transition from political ideology to legislated government policy.

Within Canadian society, this is fairly common knowledge. What may be less well known is that on an international scale, constitutionally-based multiculturalism … is a rarity.

In fact, only two nations in the world have such a policy­—Canada (35,000,000 people) and Australia (23,000,000). While many countries promote the concept of diversity, a mere (1%) of the world’s nations are officially multicultural.

At present, Canada has the highest per-capita immigration rates in the world. In conjunction with legislated multiculturalism, the impact upon our nation has been profound­— so profound, it is arguable the long-term result will be a complete re-invention (transformation) of Canadian society.

For decades, Canadians have been informed by government that multiculturalism is “equitable”, and “beneficial” to all. Is this really the case? The answer–­ one which may surprise a great number of Canadians – ­is absolutely not.

[…]

In 1971 when Multiculturalism was in its infancy, about 95% of Canada’s population was of (White) European descent. (Today, we’re down to 77% and still plummeting in numbers – ELN Editor)

[…]

Decades of large-scale immigration, particularly from Asia and the Middle East, have rendered the traditional meaning of the term (“racial minority”) irrelevant. In 2014, twenty-six out of Canada’s 308 political ridings such as Richmond, B.C. and Brampton, Ontario were majority NON-white.

[…]

Canadians of European descent are now minorities within these twenty-six ridings­ — and yet hundreds of millions of (your tax) dollars are still being funnelled to multicultural organizations to promote their cultural agendas — despite the fact they are no longer minorities at all. (Read: No Punjabi, NO Job for Canadian Nurse)

On the flip side, the freshly-minted Caucasian minorities receive nothing. Even more disconcerting is the fact that when citizens point out the inequality of the present system, the pro-multicultural forces play what is known as the “race card.”  >to Full Report

national Flag of Canada

CANADIANS, please read this:
http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/05/17/immigrants-cost-23b-a-year-fraser-institute-report/

Also read:

“Racist” Flyers Attacked Again

Importing BLACK Violence

Importing Jamaican “Culture”

**********************************

JAPAN Prefers Racial Homogeneity

Welcome to Sweden – En Arg Blatte Talar

Post Navigation

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 125 other followers

%d bloggers like this: