What country, you ask?
Cardboard “home” for White family.
What country, you ask?
Under 8 minutes
EXTRA clicks to view this video. Don’t be dissuaded by scare tactics.
OLD people make me sick.
Not all old people. NOT Canadian old people.
It’s those FOREIGN old people who fill up my Canadian city. They’re the ones who make me sick.
OK … maybe they don’t actually “make” me sick … but they certainly make it difficult to “get better”.
Getting better health-wise is more difficult when you have to wait in a hospital emergency waiting room BEHIND seventeen turbaned, or hijabed 70 year olds who arrived in Canada — YESTERDAY — under our ludicrous ‘family reunification’ program. (Not many old people arrive here from Scotland, France or Ireland to clog up our already over taxed health care system. I don’t see too many of them.)
Old foreigners make me sick because they make me, and my elderly Canadian relatives wait AFTER them. We wait for doctor’s appointments, we wait for nursing home beds, we wait for chronic care, we wait for long term care, we wait for medical testing, we wait for essential surgery, we wait in emergency rooms, we wait and wait and wait BEHIND these queue-jumping old FOREIGNERS!
TORONTO Hospital – Foreigners waiting for their “free” socialized medical care.
Story > HERE
Sometimes we wait so long that we die. And then we go to heaven. Where else would such generous, selfless compassionate people go? I hear that God has a special surprise for old Canadians who die waiting for medical treatment. They are reincarnated as the old parents of Federal Cabinet Ministers, and, they never have to wait for medical treatment again.
God also has a surprise in store for the people who immigrate to Canada, and then bring their old parents over to suck the life out of OUR health care system. I hear that God brings them back after death reincarnated as obese, blind, crippled old Liberals with renal failure and chronic pain who can’t find a family physician or a specialist.
Now that’s poetic justice. God’s humble way of giving the real, unhyphenated Canadians, who lived here all their lives — and who die waiting in line behind old foreigners — a bit of restitution and justice.
Except its not free. It was bought with money, and it was bought with flesh and blood. Money from taxes paid over a lifetime by that sick old Canadian standing over there waiting patiently (like all good Canadians do) while the old foreigner receives their medical treatment first.
It was the flesh & blood of pioneers/settlers who arrived here years ago BEFORE everything was “free“, and who sacrificed to build a nation for their children. Now, their children (and children’s children) suffer and die while waiting in line behind recently-arrived old foreigners who have sacrificed nothing, and to whom we owe nothing.
Maybe the government hasn’t heard, but there is a demographic crises happening in all Western civilized nations. Canada is no exception. The population is aging. The ratio of young people to old – workers to retirees has never been larger in the history of our nation. It is thought that in 20 – 30 years there won’t be enough young people in Canada to support the huge number of old people.
Politicians know all about this. They know exactly what’s going on. Sadly, their need to curry votes in Canada’s ethnic communities is more important to them than the health and welfare of Canadian citizens.
They allow old foreigners to flood into Canada, to the tune of 40,000 Foreign Oldsters a year (almost all from NON-white, 3rd world countries), because it is in their political interest.
Ethnic communities will vote for the politician that acts in their best interest. And they want mommy and daddy here with them — damn the cost to the rest of us. They might sympathise with sick Canadians, but they won’t pull mommy out of line so a Canadian can see the doctor first. They take care of their own first. Is it wrong for the rest of us to do the same?
The truth is that we don’t NEED any more old people. We are growing more than enough of our own. And yet, the parasitical travesty that is our “family reunification program”, continues unabated. In my view, no one over the age of 40 should be allowed to immigrate to Canada. We have too many old people to support already.
I have heard the plaintive arguments in favor of allowing immigrants to bring their old parents here to Canada as permanent residents. One argument is that many immigrants would simply go to some other country that allows family reunification.
SO WHAT … I say! If they want to put their own interests above those of their Canadian benefactors, …to HELL with them.
And legal immigrants who come to Canada can visit their parents in their OWN homeland, or bring them over for short visits. Our health care system will be less labored because of it.
Also … there are those immigrants who’re occasionally trotted out onto TV programs, moaning piteously with their sob stories that they “need” their old mother and father “to mind their six kids because they can’t afford child care“. Oh, “cry me a river“.
Hey Akmed, try having one or two children like us normal Canadians, and you wouldn’t need to foist YOUR sick, old parents onto OUR health care system just to save yourself a few bucks in baby-sitting fees.
Yeah, just 8 %.
Respect for other races and cultures does NOT mean that Western Whites should commit suicide.
Old foreigners make me sick.
Most of them have contributed NOTHING to our nation and have never worked a day in Canada for their entire lives. Now, after spending all their lives contributing to their own precious, foreign homelands, they drag themselves over to CANADA, the land of FREE (for them) healthcare. They expect tolerant, elderly Canadians to smile as they’re pushed aside, so they can line up in FRONT for home care, doctors appointments, nursing home beds, surgeries and other vital social (welfare) services.
As I grow older, I become more angry about this abuse of Canadian goodwill. Someday, I’ll be an old Canadian sitting in the ER (emergency room) surrounded by sick, old foreigners muttering quietly in their foreign language while they wait in line AHEAD of me for medical treatment. Well, they just better hope that I don’t have a terminal disease, because with nothing to lose, I might decide to take a few of them with me.
Kind reader, it’s time to start giving our OWN old people … priority over foreigners. No one should work and pay taxes their entire lives in their OWN country … only to find themselves waiting BEHIND a bunch of old FOREIGNERS when requiring vital medical treatment. It’s just not right. >Source
U.S. and Canada experience the same 3rd-World immigrant problems.
Pat Buchanan [...] In three weeks of my radio-TV tour to promote “The Suicide of a Superpower,” no question has occurred more often than one about the chapter “The End of White America.” Invariably, the question boils down to this: Why should we care if White Americans become a minority? America (interviewers remind me) assimilated the immigrants of a century ago—Italians, Poles, Jews, Slavs—and we can do the same with (NON-white) peoples from the 3rd World.
“Immigration: A Plan To Alter The Nation’s Soul” is a U.K. column written on February 13, 2010, about three months before May’s U.K. general election.
Its author, Janet Daley, describes how the Labour government set out over a decade ago to increase immigration in order to ALTER the composition of the UK’s population. By bringing in large numbers of immigrants, it wanted to create “a multicultural society which would have to reassess its own history, replacing traditional pride with inherited guilt.”
This policy “would require the wholesale de-construction of the country’s sense of its own identity.” In forming this policy, it did not consult with the UK public. Before implementing this policy, it did not ask the UK public to approve it.
The documents that describe this policy were [only] revealed early this year.
Ms. Daley rightly characterizes them as “political dynamite”. Undoubtedly, they contributed to the defeat of Gordon’ Brown’s Labour government. Ms. Daley writes from a partisan viewpoint, but she provides a number of interesting insights into why Labour introduced its high immigration policy.
Obviously, these objectives are very similar to those that are currently in practice in Canada. What is shocking … is that all of the five main political parties in Canada support mass immigration which is bringing about the same result as that sought by the UK’s Labour Party. None of our federal parties have ever consulted with Canada’s public or asked its approval. –Immigration Watch Canada–
By Janet Daley
So now we know what Labour’s immigration policy was really about.
The “open door” was NOT simply held ajar in order to admit a fresh workforce that would help to fill gaps in the growing economy. NOR was it just a gesture of hospitality and goodwill to those who were fleeing from repressive or inhospitable regimes in order to seek a better life.
Both of those aims would have been credible if controversial and not thought-through in all their consequences. And so would the longer-term view that dynamic, cosmopolitan societies are generally healthier and more productive than in-bred, isolated ones, or that immigrants who tend to be ambitious for themselves and their families could help to counter the passivity and defeatism that tend to be endemic in the British class system.
But as it turns out, the policy was motivated by something far more radical and fundamental than any of this.
The full text of the draft policy paper composed in 2000 by a Home Office research unit the gist of which had already been made public by a former Labour adviser was released last week under Freedom of Information rules.
Properly understood, it is political dynamite. What it states quite unequivocally was that mass immigration was being encouraged at least as much for “social objectives” as for economic ones.
Migration was intended specifically to alter the demographic and cultural pattern of the country: to produce by force majeure the changes in attitude that the Labour government saw itself as representing.
Tony Blair’s “forces of conservatism” speech; his improbable presentation of Britain as a “young country“; the advocacy of a multicultural society which would have to reassess its own history, replacing traditional (White) pride with inherited guilt: all of this could be facilitated by a large influx of (NON–white) migrants whose presence in the population would require the wholesale deconstruction of the country’s sense of its own identity.
This may all sound rather far-fetched now, but try to recall just how much hubris the New Labour tide brought with it in the beginning: the contempt for history and the Year Zero arrogance with which they set about “modernising” the nation’s institutions.
It was, in this respect, a prime example of the new direction which Left-wing parties were forced to take in the wake of Marxism’s collapse. Having lost the great economic argument of the 20th century, the Left had to switch its focus to society itself: if humanity could not be transformed through the redistribution of wealth and the socialist command economy, then it would have to be transfigured by altering social relations.
The object of the exercise was still to produce, in the words of an old Left-wing protest song, a “new world” based on a “new man”. But now the new man (sorry, “person”) would be formed not by changes in the power of capital or the ownership of the means of production, but in cultural attitudes and behaviour. The revolution now had to be confined to what went on in people’s heads: to their values, their assumptions and their reactions to each other. -Full Article HERE.
As Robert C. Davis notes in this eye-opening account of Barbary Coast slavery — American historians have studied every aspect of enslavement of Africans by whites BUT have largely ignored enslavement of White (Europeans) by North Africans (Moslems).
Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters is a carefully researched, clearly written account of what Prof. Davis calls “the other slavery,” which flourished during approximately the same period as the trans-Atlantic trade, and which devastated hundreds of European coastal communities.
Slavery plays nothing like the central role in the thinking of today’s whites that it does for blacks, but not because it was fleeting or trivial matter. The record of Mediterranean slavery is, indeed, as black as the most tendentious portrayals of American slavery. Prof. Davis, who teaches Italian social history at Ohio State University, casts a piercing light into this fascinating but neglected corner of history.
The Barbary Coast, which extends from Morocco through modern Libya, was home to a thriving man-catching industry from about 1500 to 1800. The great slaving capitals were Salé in Morocco, Tunis, Algiers, and Tripoli, and for most of this period, European navies were too weak to put up more than token resistance.
What is most striking about Barbary slaving raids is their scale and reach. Pirates took most of their slaves from ships, but they also organized huge, amphibious assaults that practically depopulated parts of the Italian coast. Italy was the most popular target, partly because Sicily is only 125 miles from Tunis, but also because it did not have strong central rulers who could resist invasion.
Building on high hills was a relative safety feature and offered an “early warning” lookout to help stave off North African Moors (Muslim) raiding parties.
Large raiding parties might be essentially unopposed. When pirates sacked Vieste in southern Italy in 1554, for example, they took an astonishing 6,000 captives. Algerians took 7,000 slaves in the Bay of Naples in 1544, in a raid that drove the price of slaves so low it was said you could “swap a Christian for an onion.”
Spain also suffered large-scale attacks. After a raid on Granada in 1566 netted 4,000 men, women, and children, it was said to be “raining [White] Christians in Algiers.” For every large-scale raid of this kind there would have been dozens of smaller ones.
If the pirates were short on galley slaves, they might put some of their captives to work immediately, but prisoners usually went below hatches for the journey home. They were packed in, barely able to move in the filth, stench, and vermin, and many died before they reached port.
Once in North Africa, it was tradition to parade newly-captured [WHITE] Christians through the streets, so people could jeer at them, and children could pelt them with refuse. At the slave market, men were made to jump about to prove they were not lame, and buyers often wanted them stripped naked again to see if they were healthy.
This was also to evaluate the sexual value of both men and women; White concubines had a high value, and all the slave capitals had a flourishing homosexual underground. Buyers who hoped to make a quick profit on a fat ransom examined earlobes for signs of piercing, which was an indication of wealth. It was also common to check a captive’s teeth to see if he was likely to survive on a tough slave-diet.
Why is there so little interest in Mediterranean slavery while scholarship and reflection on black slavery never ends? As Prof. Davis explains, White slaves with non-white masters simply do not fit “the master narrative of European imperialism.”
The victimization schemes so dear to academics require White wickedness … not White SUFFERING. > Source
The “Swan Song” is a metaphorical phrase for a final gesture, effort, or performance given just before death or retirement.
6 minutes – Listen to song, click centre.
Nov. 2006 – Nov. 2018
ELLIOT LAKE NEWS recently celebrated its 12th anniversary of blogging on alternative news primarily related to White identity politics, White Genocide, Multi–culti, 3rd-world immigration, race and other “taboo” topics.
Having maintained this Blog for a dozen years by constantly adding new material, we’ve decided to just add fresh videos/photos/memes/illustrations to old posts appropriate to the story line, and re-cycling those timeless posts to the front page. So Elliot Lake News is not entirely going away … just placing ourselves in semi-retirement mode.
Our 1,900+ posts will always remain for your review, research or re-blogging (without permission). Simply scroll to near the bottom of this page to “categories”, “archives” and “search” bar.
We’ve never monetize this Blog, nor asked for any compensation … a policy we’ve adhered to for the past 12 years. All advertisements tagged at the end of our displayed posts are the sole responsibility of WordPress only.
We leave this post as a reminder that you can always >> START YOUR OWN NEWS BLOG … and begin anew. (ELN Editor)
Great, Great Grand-Father’s Time
Rochdale, U.K. – 118 Years Later
Today’s NEW Sweden
Other “SWEDEN” posts > HERE
23 minutes of blockbusting revelations!