‘Feminism’ Has Communist Roots


Betty Naomi Goldstein Friedan
Friedan (Betty Naomi Goldstein)

Henry Makow Ph.D.

Betty Friedan, the “founder of modern feminism” pretended to be a typical 1950’s American mother who had a “revelation” that women like her were exploited and should seek independence and self-fulfillment in career.

What Friedan (nee: Betty Naomi Goldstein) didn’t say is that she had been a Communist propagandist since her student days at Smith College (1938-1942) and that the destruction of the family has always been central to the Communist plan for world government. See “The Communist Manifesto” (1848).

Friedan dropped out of grad school to become a reporter for a Communist news service. From 1946 -1952 she worked for the newspaper of the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, (UE) “the largest Communist-led institution of any kind in the United States.” In 1947, Congress targeted the UE as a Communist front and its membership began a steady decline.

Daniel Horowitz, a History Professor at Smith with impeccable Liberal and Feminist credentials documents all this in his book, Betty Friedan and the Making of the Feminine Mystique: The American Left, the Cold War and Modern Feminism (University of Massachusetts Press 1999).

Horowitz cites a union member who described how a Communist minority “seized control of the UE national office, the executive board, the paid-staff, the union newspaper and some district councils and locals.”

Betty Friedan doesn’t want anyone to know her radical antecedents. Throughout her career, she said she had no interest in the condition of women before her “revelation.” She refused to cooperate with Professor Horowitz and accused him of “Red-baiting.”

Why? Because her book “The Feminine Mystique” (1963) would not have sold over five million copies if her subversive background were known. Communists operate by subterfuge — pretending to be just like us.

This is the “Popular Front” strategy that consisted of starting idealistic movements in order to ensnare well-meaning people, usually students, workers, women, artists or intellectuals. The membership was ignorant that their organization was funded and controlled by people with a totally different agenda. This is also the principle behind freemasonry, Zionism and Communism itself.

Essentially the adherents are dupes.

Willi Munzenberg, an early confidante of Lenin, organized the Popular Fronts in the 1920’s and 1930’s and referred to them as “my innocents clubs“. He pioneered the protest march, the demonstration, the radical bookstore and publication, the arts festival, and the recruitment of celebrities (“fellow travellers.”)

In the words of historian Stephen Koch — Munzenbergwas amazingly successful at mobilizing the intelligentsia of the West on behalf of a moralistic set of political attitudes responsive to Soviet needs. In the process, he organized and defined the ‘enlightened’ moral agenda of his era.” (Double Lives: Spies and Writers in the Secret Soviet War of Ideas Against the West, New York, 1994, p.14.)

In a 1989 interview, Babette Gross, the wife of Willy Munstenberg, described the Popular Front modus operandi:

“You do not endorse Stalin. You do not call yourself a Communist. You do not call upon people to support the Soviets. Never! You claim to be an independent minded idealist. You don’t really understand politics but you claim the little guy is getting a lousy break.” (Koch, p. 220)

Friedan observed this principle when she helped start second-wave Feminism, which is a classic “Popular Front.” The very name, “the woman’s movement” and claim to be for “equality” are but a smoke screen for a diabolical crusade to destroy the institution of the family.

1236204_641907005873004_911354740_n.jpg

For example, feminist professor Alison Jagger calls the nuclear family “a cornerstone of women’s oppression: it enforces women’s dependence on men, it enforces heterosexuality and it imposes the prevailing masculine and feminine character structures on the next generation.” (“Feminist Politics and Human Nature,” 1988)

The “Congress of American Women,” a Popular Front organization founded in 1946 reached a membership of 250,000. It was disbanded in 1950 after being required to register as a “foreign agent” by the U.S. Government.

Feminist historian Ruth Rosen writes that the “CAW’s agenda prefigured much of the modern women’s movement that emerged in the sixties.” (Ruth Rosen, The World Split Open: How the Modern Women’s Movement Changed America, New York, 2000, p.28.)

The FBI kept tabs on the “Women’s movement” but found no direct connection with Soviet subversion. Ruth Rosen, herself a veteran, finds this ironic.

“Ironically, the FBI searched for signs of subversion in the Women’s movement but couldn’t recognize what was truly dangerous. While they looked for Communists and bombs, the women’s movement was shattering traditional ideas about work, customs, education, sexuality, and the family.

Ultimately the movement would prove far more revolutionary than the FBI could ever imagine. Feminism would leave a legacy of disorientation, debate and disagreement, create cultural chaos and social change for millions of men and women, and, in the process, help ignite the culture wars that would polarize American society. But at the time these ideas were not what the FBI considered subversive.” (260)

By attacking the social fabric, feminists inflicted more damage to Western society than Communists ever dreamed. Domestic violence hysteria has driven a wedge between men and women. Women have been psychologically neutered. They are encouraged to pursue sex and career not family.

The US birth rate has plummeted from 3.9 children per woman in 1960 to 2 today, the lowest level in history. [Replacement is 2.1] The marriage rate has declined by 1/3 while the divorce rate has doubled since 1960. More than half of all first-born US children are conceived or born out of wedlock. (William Bennett, “The Broken Hearth” p.13)

The feminist Trojan Horse has proven extremely effective. The question is why? How could a sick subversive philosophy that openly pits women against men have been able to succeed?

The disconcerting answer is that monopoly capitalists are behind both Communism and Feminism and use them to undermine the political and cultural institutions of Western Civilization.

Rockefeller-Rothschild cartels own most of the world and naturally assume they should control it too. They own most of our politicians, media and educators. Their goal is a (N.W.O.) “new world order” (a.k.a. “globalization“) in which they remake mankind to fit their nefarious ends. (Related: “Useful Idiots”) [their term]

Betty Friedan…. take a bow.  http://henrymakow.com/

An Awakened CANADIAN Woman

*****************

Another Awakened CANADIAN Woman (young 18 yr. old)

*****************
An Awakened AMERICAN Woman

******************

******************

***************

…a FUN video based on PARODY.

ALSO READ:

N.W.O. Plans For U.S.

45 DECLARE Communist Goals

********************************

Feminist Dupes

Radical Feminists Are Useful Idiots

Commie Plan For American Women

**************************************

German Government Promoting INCEST

Advertisements

27 thoughts on “‘Feminism’ Has Communist Roots

  1. Pingback: Feminisim’s Negative Consequences | ELLIOT LAKE News

  2. Pingback: Check Your “White Privilege” | ELLIOT LAKE News

  3. Pingback: Condemning “Racism” is Illuminati Social-Engineering | ELLIOT LAKE News

  4. Pingback: Communism Never Left Us | ELLIOT LAKE News

  5. Pingback: ‘Feminism’ Has Communist Roots | News-Press-Liberty With Responsibility!

  6. Pingback: The Illuminati Depopulation Agenda | News-Press-Liberty With Responsibility!

  7. Pingback: Political Correctness Gone Mad | ELLIOT LAKE News

  8. Pingback: To See The Farm, Is To Leave It | ELLIOT LAKE News

  9. Pingback: ‘Feminism’ Has Communist Roots | Vonne Monai

  10. Pingback: Commie Plan For American Women « ELLIOT LAKE News & Views

  11. Pingback: “Useful Idiots” « ELLIOT LAKE News & Views

  12. Pingback: State Destruction of Family | ELLIOT LAKE News & Views

  13. Pingback: We’re All Commies « Cinie’s World

  14. Pingback: By Conquest Or Consent « ELLIOT LAKE News & Views

  15. Pingback: Roots Of “POLITICAL CORRECTNESS” « TORONTO News & Views

  16. Pingback: Explaining Political-Correctness « ELLIOT LAKE NEWS & VIEWS

  17. Pingback: N.W.O. Plans For US « ELLIOT LAKE NEWS & VIEWS

  18. Pingback: Radical Feminists Are Useful Idiots « Elliot Lake News & Views

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s