Is Racial Diversity Good For Canada?

By Jared Taylor

English: Picture of Jared Taylor.
Jared Taylor

 Prof. David Divine (a Black man) of DalhousieUniversity in Halifax, Canada, agreed to meet Jared Taylor in a debate on whether racial diversity is a strength or a weakness. Later, he backed out of his agreement, claiming he had been unaware of Mr. Taylor’s background, and was now unwilling to let him speak.

These are [some of] the remarks Mr. Taylor had planned to give.


And I submit to you, ladies and gentlemen, that an assertion — a belief — is all it is.

How, exactly, is racial diversity a strength for Canada, or any other country? Does it raise per capita GNP? Does it improve crop yields? Does it lower crime rates? Does it reduce green house gases? Does it lower taxes?

No, it doesn’t do any of those things. I’m not sure I have ever heard its boosters say specifically what it does.

I will tell you what RACIAL DIVERSITY does: It results in conflict, tension, and hostility. At its worst, racial diversity can lead to race riots, racially-motivated murder and assault.

Toronto Street Robbery

[Need more proof?

Australia Meets With Black Crime

African Assault on Australia

African Violence Comes To IRELAND]

At its best, when communities of different races try to live together they simply leave each other alone. The result is relatively peaceful, voluntary segregation. Except for a few bohemians, people of different races do not often mingle naturally and happily.

Read: Racial Tipping Point at Burlington Schools

Read: “A Racial Program For The 20th Century”

Listen: Black guy making sense on “diversity”.


Now, you probably think that every major Canadian institution from the federal government on down takes the view that racial diversity is a “great strength” for Canada. In fact, they all agree with me. They all assert most emphatically that racial diversity is not a source of strength, but a source of conflict. The only difference is that instead of the word conflict,” they use the word racism.” Whatever “racism” may be, they all agree that it is a very bad thing, and that Canadian society is riddled with it.

Obviously, if there was no racial diversity in Canada, there could be no racial discrimination.

So please remember this: Whenever people complain about racism, bigotry, hatred, racial profiling, discrimination, they’re not talking about the joys and benefits of racial diversity. They’re admitting that it IS a source of tension and suffering!

People protest against racism in the Kensingto...
“ANTI-racist” is a code word for Anti-White” Calgary, Alberta.


How bad is the race problem? The Ontario Human Rights Commission says “Racial discrimination and racism” are “pervasive and continuing.” The Canadian Race Relations Foundation says “racism is serious and pervasive.” The Canadian Commission for UNESCO says racism “imperils democracy.” The federal Human Rights Commission says “hate and, in particular, its manifestation on the Internet pose a serious threat to the social fabric of Canadian society.”


How can racial diversity be a ‘strength’ if it gives rise to something that ‘imperils democracy’ that ‘poses a serious threat to the social fabric of Canadian society?’

This question deserves an answer, ladies and gentlemen, but because Prof. Divine is afraid to debate me and I’m afraid it will not get one. In fact, I suspect Prof. Divine is afraid to debate me because he knows this question has no answer.


Racism within the health care system; Racism in the criminal justice system; The racism inherent in white civilization; Racism in Shakespeare’s The Tempest; Everyday racism in medical school; The systemic racism that is prevalent in Nova Scotia; Contemporary Representations of Racism in Children’s Books; Racism, Birth Control and Reproductive Rights; Racism and Science Fiction; Thinking More Creatively About Racism and How to Tackle It; Systemic racism affects every aspect of our daily lives; Commission on Systemic Racism in the Ontario Criminal Justice System. By golly, it’s everywhere. And this is just a tiny sample of the stuff that’s on the Dalhousie site.


So it appears that racism is a very considerable scourge in Canada, but it is reassuring to know that commissions and tribunals and study groups and associations and foundations are beavering away night and day fighting it. They’ll soon have “racism” under control, right? Well, maybe not.

A recent survey by Statistics Canada found that, nearly 50 percent of blacks say they have suffered from discrimination or unfair treatment, as have 33% of South Asians and Chinese. (No report by StatCan on whether any Whites suffer from racism.) A 2003 report on immigrants living in West Central Toronto found that 68% had suffered just from housing discrimination, let alone any other kind of discrimination.


Let us accept, for a moment, the lefty view of all this, namely that racismwhatever that may beis a moral failing that afflicts only Whites.

NON-whites — every man, woman and child — are “noble, un-offending sufferers”, whose sole aim is to be accepted as the loyal “Canadians” they are. Parenthetically, this seems to be the view of all your “human rights” commissions, too, but no matter. If this view is correct, it means Whites are a uniquely defective people who break out in helpless spasms of racism whenever they encounter non-whites.

gooderham building in toronto

TORONTO once had a low crime rate composed of a majority 97% HOMOGENEOUS WHITE population of 2.1 million until the 1970s. Then NON-white foreigners began arriving from poor, 3rd world countries that offered us nothing we didn’t have EXCEPT racial conflict.
Toronto’s WHITE population is now reduced to about 50% of the 2.5 million people!

How Canadians were … without the “joys of diversity” in 1968.
(No sound)

Also see:  Canada’s BLACK Population

…continuing>  But if that is true, why must Whites — and their non-white victims — be put through the ordeal of racial diversity? If, after decades of combating racism, Whites are still hopelessly racist — what is gained by an immigration policy that brings in … yet more NON-whites, only to make them suffer at the hands of Whites, and one that degrades Whites by bringing out the worst in them? 

Toronto used to be virtually all-White (just over 35 years ago). There couldn’t have been much racial discrimination. Today, all official sources agree that Toronto is a hive of “racial discrimination”. How has racial diversity, therefore been a strength for Toronto, or for Canada?

See: Importing BLACK Violence

This, therefore, is one problem with racial diversity. The races don’t seem to get along very well. Just look at all this agonizing and hand-wringing over racism. You may choose to blame all the problems exclusively on wicked White people, but why pretend racial diversity is a “strength”?

There is a 2nd aspect of racial diversity on which Canada is strangely silent. Have the NON-whites who’ve now arrived and subsequently altered the racial landscape…. improved the country? I realize this is a taboo question, but let us ask it anyway.


Canada is too squeamish to collect crime statistics by race, but the United States is not. We know, for example, that Blacks commit robbery and murder at approximately eight to ten times (800% to 1000%) the White rate, and Hispanics commit these crimes at 3 to 4 times the White crime rate.

Hispanics are 19X more likely than Whites to be in youth gangs, and Blacks are 18 times more likely. I would suspect there are equally striking racial differences in Canada, but no one knows because the government doesn’t want to know.

Minorities, Crime and Punishment (PDF File)


Back to Toronto in 2005, a coalition of 22 black community groups — but, let’s stop right there. A coalition of 22 BLACK community groups!? Twenty-two race based associations!?

What do they all do? Why are they needed? Why are they racially exclusive? How many more are there that are not part of this coalition? Are they all glorying in the “strengths of racial diversity“?

See: Importing JAMAICAN “Culture”


So what are we to conclude from all this? Ladies and gentlemen, let us face facts squarely. Racial diversity in Canada, just as it is in America, is a troubling ordeal. Sometimes, a difficult, agonizing ordeal. It’s a source of resentment, guilt-mongering, and endless charges of “racism”.

If racial diversity was a “strength”, NONwhite groups would not set up countless race-based organizations to protect and advance their interests. If it were a “strength”, no organizations would need diversity managers, or sensitivity training. If it were a strength, Canadians would not naturally separate on racial lines.


Let’s return for a moment to the subject of speaking freely. Let’s talk freely about “White flight”.

In a 2004 Toronto Star article, Statistics Canada reported on the appearance of visible minority neighborhoods in Canada’s big cities.

WHITE residents used to live in these places … but they have moved out.  

According to the Toronto Star newspaper, StatsCan could not bring itself to use the term “white flight” … and instead wrote only about “rapid replacement.”

Well, someone apparently wasn’t informed about how we’re now supposed to discuss these points. That same year, 2004, Toronto city councilman from Scarborough Mike Del Grande told his local paper that a lot of White people are moving out of his ward.

Another councilman immediately jumped on Mr. Del Grande:

To hear someone say White people are leaving, and Chinese are coming in, can be nothing other than a “racist” comment,” said Joe Mihevc.

Poor Mr. Del Grande had to apologize: “I should have said many older residents of the community (are moving out),” he said. “I didn’t say it in a politically-correct way.

What is going on when a city councilman says something that is obviously true, is accused of “racism”, and is forced to say he should have SPOKEN IN CODE rather than speak clearly? You can’t even describe what is going on before your very eyes, much less talk about why Whites are leaving, and whether they might even be justified in leaving! This doesn’t sound like a “strength” to me.

The vice principal of Queens University unbosomed what strikes me as a significant truth about Canada. Recently he was quoted as saying,

Our Canadian culture has been squeamish about gathering race-based statistics because no one wants to see ethnic makeup reduced to numbers on a page. But unless you get this kind of information, you don’t really know if you have a problem.”

Well, yes. How do you even begin to assess whether racial diversity is a strength or a weakness unless you gather the information. Do different groups have different rates of illegitimacy? School failure? Poverty? If they do, does it make [any] sense to add to those racial groups through immigration?

Take CRIME data, for example. I understand Canada does not keep records of racial differences in crime rates. Too squeamish, I suppose. And yet, everyone knows some groups commit more crime than others. Your newspapers talk about it indirectly.


The power of “political-correctness“:

  • You have a Left-wing policy that causes damage to the country and, as it defies common sense, you don’t want it openly discussed – call it mass 3rd world immigration?
  • Find a half sensible sounding reason (which would appeal only to the half sensible though) why people shouldn’t even discuss it – it might offend immigrants?
  • Find a derogatory term to scream at those who dare to disobey – “RACIST, RACIST”?
  • Put career pressure on those professionals who refuse to toe the line – get them dismissed?
There’s nothing wrong with the following video picture by having ONE Race, ONE Nationality, ONE Language & ONE homogenous people proudly singing their national song in their OWN country!  Right?




Is Burlington TOO White?

Happiest City In Canada

Race Diversity – But Why?


Frank Talk On Immigration

Canadians DUPED On Multiculturalism

Guelph, ON Importing Multi-racialism

Canadian City Abhors “White Privilege”


WHITE Americans – An Endangered Species

Multiculturalism – A Dividing Force

Racial Diversity – A CON Game


Non-Assimilating Immigrants

Britain’s Inverted Racist Policies

One Proud European Nation


So, This Is England 2009

Diversity Is A Fraud

Racial Diversity, Not!

The Racism Ploy


59 thoughts on “Is Racial Diversity Good For Canada?

Add yours


    If we equate “racial diversity” with multiculturalism, and I think we must, it isn’t good for Canada. The first and biggest problem is that it is the OPPOSITE of our quasi-legislative FEDERALISM. What is that?

    Well, had there been a “legislative” union of the British North American colonies in 1867, we would have ONE Parliament and no provincial Legislatures. Instead, we had a quasi-legislative union in 1867. Acting as a WHOLE nation in federal elections, we send one set of elected representatives to the Parliament to make law for Canada.

    Acting as LOCAL peoples, each in our “reserved” territory, also called a “section” or a Province, we EACH send another set of elected representatives to our respective Legislatures.

    UNION would not have been agreed to by the Founding Peoples in 1867 had it NOT been Federal, with a unique Legislature for each colony to maintain and advance its own interests, LOCALLY.

    Confederation is therefore about LEGAL SEPARATISM under which each founding people was expected to have majority control of its territory, and thus of its culture and its laws, along with joint control of immigration with the central Parliament.

    Multiculturalism is NOT CANADIAN federalism and it is NOT a harbinger of legislative union, because it is not about oneness, it is a buckshot immigration policy which scatters hundreds of other races and cultures all across Canada, giving them priority over Canadians. Multiculturalism shoots holes into the national fabric of the federal nation, as well as into the local fabric of every “section” or province.

    French Canadians recently took to the streets to PROTEST against multiculturalism and all of its ideological and structural underpinnings, including forced public and private indoctrination in the ideology of normative pluralism, represented in the video description below by the Religion and Ethics course:

    The video uploader wrote this description in French (English translation below):

    Marche contre la dénationalisation 2011 à Montréal.

    Qu’est-ce que la dénationalisation ?

    La dénationalisation se décrit par la tentative de négation et de remplacement de l’identité historique du peuple canadien-francais au Québec. Elle représente les politiques gouvernementales du multiculturalisme fédéral et de l’interculturalisme provincial, ainsi que les moyens utilisés pour mettre celles-ci en application. Entre autres, l’immigration massive, le cours d’Éthique et Culture Religieuse (ECR), la carence délibérée de cours d’histoire nationale dans nos écoles et le non-respect de la loi 101 sont des agents de la dénationalisation de notre peuple.


    March against denationalization in 2011 in Montreal.

    What is denationalization?

    Denationalization is the attempt to negate and to replace the historic identity of the French Canadian people of Quebec. It represents the governmental policies of multiculturalism and provincial inter-culturalism, as well as the means employed to put these policies into application. Amongst others, massive immigration, the public school course in “Ethics and Religious Culture” (ECR), the deliberate omission of a course in national history in our schools, and the non-respect of Law 101 [protecting the French language], which are agents of the denationalization of our (French Canadian) people.”

    * * *


    Should we be concerned about French Canadians referring to themselves as a people, as a “nation” being denationalized? Isn’t it “separatism”? Not at all. IT’S CONFEDERATION. And here’s why. Official, LEGAL “separation” of the Founding Peoples under distinct Legislatures is what Confederation was about for ALL Founding Canadians. It gave us a country to share, as ONE political nation, and PROVINCES as our home turf to govern ourselves on our own terms, and preserve and develop our respective Founding cultures and racial nations.

    Although there are minorities in each Province, which is inevitable, the whole purpose of the Provincial Legislatures in 1867 was to give LOCAL INDEPENDENCE to each Founding People. This is more clear from a quote from 1867.

    On the very first “Canada Day”, July 1st, 1867, Le Minerve, the newspaper mouthpiece of George Etienne Cartier, wrote as follows to describe the new Confederation: [TRANSLATION]

    “Such is the meaning that must be attached to this Constitution. In it, we see the recognition of the French-Canadian nationality; we form a State within the State, with full enjoyment of our rights, and the formal recognition of our independence.”

    Source: Studies on the Canadian Constitution and Canadian Federalism, The Constitution Act, 1867, the Confederation Debates and Provincial Autonomy. Claude Bélanger, Department of History, Marianopolis College – Last revised: 26 February 2001

    These same LEGAL recognitions apply to ALL Founding Canadians and their natural heirs to whom Confederation belongs. We need to learn from our French-Canadian allies in Canada, who thankfully are not too politically correct, too intimidated, or too shy to take to the streets with their LOCAL FLAG which represents THEIR Founding People, and STAND UP FOR THEMSELVES.

    As Canadians, we must also stand up for EACH OTHER and our true Constitutional Alliance, which in 1867 gave birth to CANADA, not to Africa, not to India, not to China, not to Cuba; but to a new FEDERATION, unique in the world, and the intended home “for all time to come” of its own unique and distinct Founding Peoples.

    Kathleen Moore
    The Official Legal Challenge
    To North American Union

    1. The town of Herouxville probably set the stage for protests against multiculturalism a few years ago.

      If we could only get more Anglo Canadians on board with these nation-saving issues, our country may even save itself from the ravages of multi-culti.

      As per usual, I’ll eventually move your post up front. I’d like to see more dedicated Canadians like yourself, submitting similar material on immigration, race and other such matters, but we’re very, very few and far between.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: