Political-Correctness Unmasked

From IWC

Anthony Browne’s “The Retreat of Reason–­Political Correctness and the Corruption of Debate in Modern Britain” is just one of a long litany of books written about the scourge of the new McCarthyism that has seized control of every important institution in the Anglophone world.

[…][ Also: Short Definition of Political Correctness]

Political correctness (PC) has been defined as a neo-puritanism that attempts to save souls through assigning taboo or “disease” status to a real discussion of ideas such as immigration. People can avoid “infection” by obeying the taboo and either not participating in or preventing a thoughtful exchange of views on such topics.


[…] [Also:  Explaining Political Correctness]

There are few as intolerant as those who preach tolerance people who transgress politically correct beliefs are not seen just as wrong, … but evil,… to be condemned, silenced and spurned….”

Browne itemizes numerous hallmarks of Political Correctness: guilt by association, ad hominem attacks, support of censorship, according high status to victim-hood, taking offence, lack of humour, etc. Some deserve emphasis.

[Also:  Political Correctness Gone Wild]

On liberal guilt, he says: “The combination of Western guilt and fear of racism has all but killed off the public concern about overpopulation in the last few decades. In the U.S., when population growth was caused by white people having too many babies, the country’s largest environment group, the Sierra Club, campaigned to control population. But now that U.S. population growth is mainly caused by immigration, it has dropped all policies on population, and indeed its funding is dependent on never trying to tackle the immigration issue.”

And of course, the PC have adopted double standards.

[Also:  Political Correctness – U.K. Style]

Ever wonder why it is now illegal in many jurisdictions to publish crime figures broken down by the ethnicity (race) of the offender, yet universities collect racial data to determine who gets in, and to ensure that visible minorities get hired?

In regards to preferential hiring, Browne’s book could have profited from the use of a flagrant Canadian example of “positive discrimination”(i.e., reverse racism and sexism). As the National Post reported on June 27, 2005, the so-called shortfall of qualified applicants to the RCMP academy was due to its gender and racial hiring quotas that required white males to score 20% higher than women and 33% higher than visible minorities on aptitude tests in order to be accepted [as police recruits]. For a while in the mid-90’s, with unmet racial and female recruitment targets co-existing with a five year backlog of Caucasian male applicants, the RCMP had a quiet “no white males” policy.

English: RCMP officer and truck
RCMP officer

[…]Browne’s argument can best be summarized in one sentence. “Political correctness [Pc] promotes the creation of a ‘victim mentality’, discourages people from taking responsibility for their own lives, suppresses free speech, and distorts public debate, leading to bad policies being adopted.”

[….all which are clearly illustrated in the above case example of the once-respected Royal Canadian Mounted Police whose hiring practises are obviously discriminatory against fully-qualified Canadian white males who [then] must score 33% higher in aptitude tests over competing visible-minorities, many, who’re born in other countries.

What ever happened to hiring the best police recruits based on merit and experience? How can the Canadian public have any confidence in “racial-hires” whose primary “qualification” was the colour of their skin? Canada’s majority white population still consists of about 86%… more HERE on this deplorable practice. -Editor]


Political correctness is a new form of dictatorship, imposed by the self-righteous. It is virtue in a jackboot, lodged in the faces of all those who dare to challenge prevailing doctrine, particularly on immigration. It is an undemocratic societal poison so pervasive that it must be neutralized before it destroys democracy itself.

[…] [Also: Political Correctness Gone Mad]

Read the FULL article Here.

Other revealing articles at: http://www.immigrationwatchcanada.org/

ALSO Read:

Group Differences Are Real

IQ And The Wealth of Nations

“RACE Diversity” – The Con Game


Is Racial Diversity Good For Canada?

Multiculturalism – A Dividing Force

WHITE People – An Endangered Species


Visible Minorities Vs Invisible Victims

PHOTO: What’s WRONG With This Picture?



  1. “It is a persistent feature of political correctness that the one afflicted by it pictures himself as being somehow “above it all,” looking down at the struggles of others as though he were a benevolent god of impartial judgment. But that’s never really true. The afflicted is himself a part of the struggle, not its referee. The divine point of view is improper for such as he. His proper task is to play nature’s game as he believes will best advance the molecular information that led to his birth, not to comment on the wisdom of (or suggest changes to) the game’s rules. If it is all the same to him whether his race or another inherits the Earth, it does not mean that he has a loftier mind than most men do; rather, it means that there is something wrong in the mind he has. Normal organisms act to perpetuate their genes, whether they exist in themselves, in their families, or in their race. Social conditioning that disrupts that pattern of behavior is not an improvement from the evolutionary point of view; it is a defect that nature will get rid of in the natural course of events.” — Jerry Abbott

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s