A Sense of Belonging

UK - London - Westminster: Parliament Square -...
Robert Peel Statue


Frank Kimbal Johnson

In the latest outburst of liberal inanity, the Home Secretary has urged ethnic minorities to acquire a greater sense of belonging in Britain.

As a former management consultant, I recall being all too frequently obliged to give some highly-opinionated, but deluded people, a blinding glimpse of the obvious. Such habits are hard to break, so here I am again to tell the Home Secretary and all his kind that the reason why the ethnic minorities feel no sense of belonging in Britain is (because) they do not belong here.

They know this, and so do most of the native population. Oh sure, they can learn to speak English well enough to get by from one transaction to the next, just as I once learned quite a lot of Arabic as a matter of personal expediency. But no-one took me for an Arab, any more than they did Lawrence of Arabia. Likewise, no-one will ever mistake the broadcaster, Trevor Macdonald (Caribbean-born Black man) for a Highland clansman… however well-groomed his appearance and diction.

Belonging’, is a very deeply-rooted and complex condition. One can be treated most hospitably in almost any community without thereby “belonging” to it in any real sense of the word. And simply acquiring a sense of belonging will never be enough to make it so, since that is only within the gift of the host community — and not as an official diktat, but at every face-to-face encounter with the community’s natural members.


In any event, most of us are bound to think there is something distinctly unwholesome about anybody seemingly anxious to disown their own racial and cultural heritage in order to acquire a spurious identity elsewhere. Flattering as it is to the chosen host community when so many seem anxious to join, it does not alter the basic incongruity of the situation. Better a happy duck any day, [other] than an imitation swan.


Invited strangers can never be more than guests in your home; and when they are not invited you will quite properly feel yourself to be invaded, whatever their own ideas about ‘belongingness’.

The fact that uninvited immigrants much prefer living conditions here is quite understandable; but that doesn’t make them genuine citizens any more than squatters can be called residents.

Britain is the homeland of people with Anglo-Saxon-Celtic ancestry going back many centuries. The country belongs to us, as we do to it. People of altogether different ancestry and culture cannot therefore belong here since, unlike the natives, they manifestly belong somewhere else.

Any property, any job, any school or college place, any hospital bed and any other item belonging to Britain can only be taken by aliens as a form of misappropriation, since such taking is necessarily at the expense of the native population.

And contending that the aliens make a valuable contribution to the country’s economy and welfare does not alter that underlying reality one iota. It is historically self-evident that this country is not only perfectly capable of looking after itself; it is also a fact that it looked after most of the immigrants’ world for two or three centuries.

Moreover, the economic input of recent immigrants, most of them uneducated and unskilled, is vastly exceeded by what they take out in terms of this country’s socio-economic and cultural assets and the damage their presence does to its social cohesion and morale.

You will be hard put to find Afro-Caribbeans making any significant contribution to this country’s intellectual or cultural capital. And Asians, very prominent in retail, commerce and catering, are conspicuously absent from the building, civil and mechanical engineering scenes. Businessmen they certainly are; but their contribution to the nation’s basic economic infra-structure is negligible, and their cultural impact imperceptible outside the curry parlour (pace Robin Cook and chicken tikka masala).

The vast majority of the people of this country are perfectly happy with their own (mono)culture and feel under no obligation, whatsoever, to see it mongrelised to make unwanted immigrants feel more at home.

Bluntly speaking, it ought to be plain enough to everybody that while Third-World immigrants obviously want this country to belong to them, they can never belong to it.

And all talk of ‘integration’ of the unwanted immigrants ignores the perfectly legitimate resistance of the native population to such enforced social engineering; people, after all, are less keen on integration than crocodiles.

Minimal concessions to host country.

The clear intention of the intruders is to make minimal concessions to the host country while doing everything they can to re-shape it to their own ends.

Some Muslims, for example, will always regard the Sharia (Islamic law) as taking precedence over secular legislation here and elsewhere (why else the so-called ‘Muslim Parliament’?), and they won’t rest until we are all hearing the muezzin’s call to prayer instead of church bells. [Multi]Cultures just don’t mix; either they assert their values and expand their territory or they are quickly displaced by others. [That] is patently obvious from history, and all the news reports of inter-racial and inter-religious conflicts around the world.


The blind bigotry of our liberal politicians in their obsessive promotion of the ‘multi-RACIAL society’ is therefore every bit as menacing to peace and stability as Muslim fanaticism.

A sleeper agent for the “new world order”

Both lay claim to the moral high ground and insist that the end justifies whatever means they choose to adopt. History is littered with high-minded atrocities; indeed, most of the post-colonial massacres in Africa and Asia can be laid squarely at the door of those who so piously campaigned to unleash the perpetrators from European constraints. But the so-called ‘law of unforeseen consequences’ still shadows the liberal manifesto.

‘Racism’ is merely the label used by renegade politicians to stifle any opposition to their perverse ideology; so those resisting alien attempts to misappropriate our country and heritage must expect to be prosecuted by these latter-day witch-hunters, armed with their ‘human rights catalogue’, search warrants and anti-British legislation. Needless to say ‘racists’, in their book, have no rights at all!

Like our most illustrious ancestors, we know where we belong and will do whatever it takes to ensure that our country never belongs to anyone else. And in so doing, to borrow a somewhat tattered piece of liberal dogma, we are simply asserting the right of self-determination.

We are just determined to safeguard our homeland against misappropriation by aliens. Make no mistake about it, ‘belongingness’ is the very heart and soul of patriotism and admits of no ideological dilution. It’s what wars are really about. So if disaffected immigrants really want to feel a sense of belonging, all they have to do is return to their homelands. One thing is certain: they will never find it here. –Source

Switzerland, Too?? (Source)


Diversity is NOT Strength

What If “They” Left? (U.S.)


How Britain Destroyed Itself

British Schools Brainwashing Children



The Right To Discriminate

Group Differences Are Real

Controversial IQ Differences


White People Are Hypocrites

Is Racial Separation Immoral?


Importing Jamaican “Culture”

Scientific DNA Racial Profiling






    I have in front of me an article in English published in a small free newspaper distributed in Montreal, Quebec. The author’s name is Dr. R. Raashed, M.A., Ph.D in law from Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia. Dr. Raashed is described as the Director of Islamic Information Services for Australia.

    Dr. Raashed says: “Muslim is an adjective of Islam. Hence there can be no Muslim without Islam. The bottom line is a Muslim can NEVER be a SECULAR.’ … (secularism) ‘represents a great challenge to the national identity of Muslims…”

    The article is dated August 15th to Sept. 15th, 2011 in the AWAJ newspaper. It specifically discusses a recent secular alteration to the constitution of Bangladesh. Dr. Raashed says: “The deliberate removal of ‘Trust in God’ from the constitution of Bangladesh put the current Awami government in a head-on collision course with the Qur’An. Hence, the government is necessarily at an ideological WAR with the believers in this ‘Only Book that contains No Doubt’.”

    Dr. Raashed says, “No matter who devised it, now that such a MAJOR CRIME has been committed by the current government, it is an Islamic obligation on every serious believer to reverse it AT ANY COST. Come what may, the Qu’ran will come out victorious. Removal of the accomplice government from office is the first remedy.”

    Now – if SECULARISM is “a MAJOR CRIME” for Muslims, and “a great challenge to the national identity of Muslims” (and I think we must understand “national” here to mean the body of the Muslim people and not merely a geographic territory where the PEOPLE itself is the resident NATION, then:

    [a] how can Muslims comply and realistically be ASKED to comply with secular LAWS in any country?

    Dr. Raashed also identifies secularism as atheism: “As part of conspiracy and public lying, secularism has been marketed in the name of religio-neutralism. Whereas in its functional meaning secularism is nothing but atheism” Raashed mentions “(ref. Dictionary.com)”.

    I put ‘secularism’ into the search field at dictionary.com and it says this:

    “sec·u·lar·ism [sek-yuh-luh-riz-uhm] noun

    1. secular spirit or tendency, especially a system of political or social philosophy that rejects all forms of religious faith and worship.

    2. the view that public education and other matters of civil policy should be conducted without the introduction of a religious element.”

    [b] How can Muslims NOT view our secular governments as authors of CRIMES against Islam?

    [c] How can they therefore NOT also, by command of their religion, seek the overthrow of OUR governments by any means, whether overtly or by stealth when we foolishly invite them to reside on OUR OWN SOIL?

    As a case in point, Muslims are currently threatening the Royal Palace in UK:

    [d] There clearly can be no such thing as multiculturalism for Islam (there can be none for the West, either, let’s get real);

    there can be NO SUCH THING as Muslim adherence to the laws of a non-Islamic government, period. They do not acknowledge the authority of such governments. So why is the West deceiving itself that such a thing is possible? Is the West blind, deaf, dumb and suicidal?

    There is NO REMOTE POSSIBILITY of mutual tolerance on the same soil.

    While we are busy self-righteously tolerating THEM – perhaps to show them just how wonderful we are so they will want to be just like us — they are busy planning to overthrow our governments because they necessarily (unless we are idiots) see themselves in an ideological WAR with our Western culture.

    What they have done in the UK by the way, in publicly calling for the overthrow of the royal Palace is, in Constitutional law, HIGH TREASON, as any such threatened overthrow necessarily “compasses the death of the Sovereign.”

    One or the other has to go, Islam or western culture and government; where it is Western soil, it had better be Islam that goes, and FAST, unless we want our little granddaughters growing up to wear the Burkha and view their ancestors as infidels.

    Kathleen Moore
    The Official Legal Challenge
    To North American Union
    My web sites are being systematically hacked, including by my Denver-based registrar, domainsite.com, which took all my HCC domains offline weeks ago and is refusing to restore them though they are all paid up and in good standing, therefore, here are two backups:

    Backup: http://habeascorpuscanada.50webs.com
    Backup: http://habeascorpuscanada.webs.com
    Blog exposing Quebec “secession” scam: http://habeascorpuscanadacomments.blogspot.com

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s