Norwegian Rape Assaults By Foreigners

“In Oslo (Norway), ALL (repeat: ‘ALL’) sexual assaults involving RAPE in the past year have been committed by males of non-western (NON-white) background; this was the conclusion of a Police report published today. This means that every single rape assault in the last five years, where the rapist could be identified, he was a man of foreign origin.”

[This political-correct Norwegian policewoman appears to mitigate these rape crimes when she partially states Many of these perpetrators……….often unemployed, arriving from traumatized countries”.

So, it’s open season on young, Norwegian white women because the foreign rapists hail from “traumatized countries’. O.K., case closed, officer … A pathetic response for a “supposed” defender of the Norwegian people.  >ELN Editor]


NORWAY was once a stable and homogeneous White European nation.
NOW … with the mass influx of incompatible, 3rd-world immigrants … Norway’s population of less than 5 million people is on the endangered list like most other European countries.

Brenda Walker

In Norway, multicultural Muslim immigration has not been working out so well for local women….. if, public safety is considered an important measure.

According to a recent police report, men with “non-western background” (aka Muslim immigrants) are the huge majority of those committing sexual assault in the capital city.

The crime wave is another example of how Muslim immigration is a bad idea, particularly for women’s rights and safety.

The talking heads are too politically correct to use the word “Muslim”, but even speaking of the rape wave in public is a big improvement. Fjordman reported in 2005 of a “Muslim Rape Epidemic in Sweden and Norway” which the authorities were covering up.

Meanwhile in the headwaters of dar al-Islam, the Saudi woman who had the grit to drive a car (verboten in The Kingdom) has been jailed.

All diversity is not “equal” … especially for women!  –Source


What happened to SWEDEN?


Raped in Oslo, Norway

Muslims In Stockholm

School Rapes UP 100%

SWEDEN Tops In Rapes

Sweden’s Ordered Society In Trouble


Swedish Reporters Muzzled

Publisher’s Memo On Immigration

More Mass Media Manipulation

Queen Guinevere's maying, by John Collier, 1900
Queen Guinevere

By Vanishing American

[…] For years…. I’ve read hand-wringing stories in the mainstream media about how Blacks feel excluded and marginalized by the lack (as they perceive it) of Black faces in advertising, movies, and TV shows.

The clamor began years ago for more blacks in the media and in all walks of life: we were told repeatedly, that black kids learn better when taught by people who look like them,’  and that was considered normal and healthy.

Somehow, though, for Whites to prefer those like themselves, it is ‘troubling.’

Troubling for whom, and why? The liberals always act as though their opinions and biases are incontestable facts, while the opinions of White people generally are biased and invalid.

Personally, I don’t consume movies of recent vintage; if I watch movies at all, I prefer movies from the pre-PC era, as do others I know.

I shy away from movies with black characters, especially in the lead roles, because their presence is a 100 percent guarantee that the movie will be Politically Correct, aimed at ‘correcting’ my wrong ideas and assumed biases. I don’t like to watch movies that treat me as the enemy, and which are meant to manipulate my thoughts or emotions, or to sway me by subtle and subliminal… or not-so-subtle means.

This is what black-oriented movies do — and let’s be honest.

People like me don’t avoid these movies because we ‘assume they are not meant for us.’ I’ve noted here, before….that I used to think that. I used to think that all the T.V. commercials with prominently-featured blacks and minorities generally were meant to lure black or other minority customers. And I wondered why such commercials would be shown on ‘typical White’ programs, or channels with nearly all-White audiences… e.g. the country music channels.

Then it finally dawned on me.

The commercials with all the sage and savvy, and the hip and well-dressed dominate black people were not meant for black audiences at all: they were aimed at those ‘typical White people’ out there; those White folks with lots of ‘troubling‘ attitudes, White people who had still not been effectively ‘politically corrected.’

The idea is not to sell products to black people; the idea is to sell multiculturalism, diversity, and minority dominance to recalcitrant White people.

So I realized… I am the target audience for these things; they want to transform my ‘sad’ attitudes, my ‘troubling’ preference and affinity for people who are like me and my family. And do you know what? The message-laden movies, TV shows, commercials, and all the rest — they work!

Look how profoundly this country has changed in the last 4 or 5 decades. Of course — to one segment of the population — to the 20% or so, who are liberal zealots — this transformation is to be applauded, and it has encouraged them to keep pushing, pushing, for more change.

So they work overtime at producing attitude-changing ‘entertainment’. It is actually propaganda wrapped up in a shiny wrapper to attract the young and the impressionable, but many of its targets do not perceive that.

If it’s new and flashy and glitzy and ‘edgy’ and over-the-top, they eat it up and ask for more, oblivious to the fact that they are being manipulated. The sheer artificiality, the falseness, of the preachy ‘diverse’ movies is the most indigestible part of it for me.

The casting of Blacks in ludicrously incongruous roles is too much to take…. for example, a black actor as the Norse god Thor — or almost as bad, a black actress as Guinevere!

And yet, many people see nothing weird or dissonant in this. Read comments or reviews of the Thor movie, and note how very few people even mention the incongruity in the casting.

Are people — at least the post-moderns — in some sort of trance? Have they really ceased noticing things like that? I shake my head at that obliviousness on the part of many White people. I truly wonder if there is some kind of subliminal messaging added to much of the mass media’s offerings to create this curious mindset.

But to the movie makers and the multicultists, this racial obliviousness on the part of some Whites is a desired result. That’s the whole point. But as for me, I just cannot take the constant ‘visual lying‘ as I call it, that is much of today’s mass media: blacks cast in roles which belie real life patterns, blacks and other minorities shown in a glowing, flattering light, while Whites (or, at least White men) are seen as inept, awkward, geeky, childlike, and weak.

How can people tolerate such lying with images? How can anyone reconcile that with anything they encounter in the real world? Personally I can’t stand falsehoods and manipulation, and so, where movies are concerned, ‘I don’t touch the stuff.’ […] To FULL ARTICLE


“Useful Idiots”

Playing Us For Fools

ANTI-white Brainwashing

Canada’s Black Population


Slanted// MSM News 

“Racism”  Is Not Sinful

Is Racial Separation Immoral?


The Dreaded “Racist” Label

“Racism” – The New Witchcraft Hysteria


BOYCOTTING Multi-Racial Products

British Schools Brainwashing Students


Importing Jamaican “Culture 

Black Culture Retarding White Kids 

“A Racial Program for the 20th Century” 

Awake From Your Slumber

Death found an author writing his life.. Desig...
Death Arrives - Your Time Has Ended

The Walking Dead: Lives Without Meaning

Have you ever had one of those moments when you thought your demise was imminent, and your life sort of flashed before your eyes? At times like that, one is often beset with regrets. What is the nature of those regrets? Individuals who have experienced this sort of event will know exactly what I’m talking about here …

You do not fret over the fancy car you couldn’t afford. You do not fret over whether your neighbors appreciated your finely manicured lawn. You do not fret that you didn’t spend enough hours in the corporate meat grinder, or that your income wasn’t high enough. The regrets you have pertain to people — almost always people other than yourself. You regret the people you might have wronged that you never made whole. You regret the time, attention and support that you should have given to loved ones, but did not. You regret the things you could have done that would have helped others, the results of which would have survived your physical death. You regret your cowardice for opportunities untaken and your failure to do the right things when you still had a chance.


Eric Wodening encapsulated the idea I am describing beautifully when he said: “We are our DEEDS.” You are not your car. You are not your house. You are not your job, bank accounts, titles or degrees. What you are — and ALL that you are — is your deeds.


As I said, during a sudden heart attack, stroke or other calamity is not the time to figure that out or have an epiphany. Usually, by then, it is too late. If, by that time, you have not figured out that the purpose of your life lies in deeds rather than material things, it’s too late and you will have lived a life devoid of meaning. In essence, you will have accomplished little more with your life than mark time while being used like a gear in a machine to produce, consume, borrow, spend and obey. In terms of the all-important content of your deeds, you will be the walking dead as your meaningless life will be no more eventful than your death … just marking time between the delivery room and the funeral home.


At certain points in life, we can derive meaning from the approval of authority figures. But eventually we see that the emperor is nude, so his approval isn’t enough anymore. At other times, we can derive meaning from the acquisition of material possessions – both from the way those possessions represent us to others, and from the possessions themselves. But at some point we reach a realization of our own mortality, and see their pursuit as being empty when pursued for their own sake. We can seek meaning in climbing a corporate ladder – until we are downsized for the third time in yet another corporate merger and realize that there is very little relationship between success in a corporate structure and our intrinsic value as people. As these transitory sources of meaning fall by the wayside, depression rears its head until we are either medicated enough not to notice or latch onto something else for a time. -To Full Essay

“Hate Crime” Bill Targets Canadians

The Centre Block on Parliament Hill, containin...
Parliament Building, OTTAWA

By Brian Lilley
Toronto Sun

Tory Crime Bill – An Attack on Our Liberty


The Conservatives plan on introducing an omnibus crime bill when the House resumes that wraps all of their earlier legislation into one.

The bill is promoted as allowing police to track and prosecute the perverts passing around child pornography and allows them to update their monitoring techniques to deal with the ever-changing computerized world we live in.

Sounds fine. What could be wrong with that?

In fact, there’s nothing wrong with that part, but there is plenty to worry about in what they propose to do regarding “hate” crimes.

The bill plans to make it a crime to link to any website that promotes hatred.

Here’s what the Library of Parliament says about the bill on its website:

“Clause 5 of the bill provides that the offences of public incitement of hatred and wilful promotion of hatred may be committed by any means of communication and include making hate material available, by creating a hyperlink that directs web surfers to a website where hate material is posted, for example.”

For simply posting a link to a website that has material someone else deems hateful, you could go to jail for two years and be branded a criminal.

The Internet police. Only in Canada.

This isn’t about protecting people from genocide or even threats of death, the way the law is written now is much broader.

“Everyone who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against an identifiable group is guilty.”

There’s also the sticky question of who decides what is hateful?

Will websites promoting Israeli Apartheid Week, now a staple on university campuses across Canada, land someone in jail? What about web postings on the Armenian genocide which the Armenians blame the Turks for but which the Turks dispute?

This is a ridiculous proposal that has no place in a country that claims to cherish freedom of expression.

We used to say: “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” Now it seems like Canadian society believes “I disapprove of what you say and I’ll prosecute you.”

The Harper Conservatives won a majority on May 2nd, so they can pass this bill without relying on any other party for support. But they still need your support and your donations and the Canadian public should tell them they will get neither if they put forward bills like this that attack (our) liberty.   –Toronto Sun Newspaper

To voice your disapproval, some contact emails are:,,,


You can also address regular mail to them…. and, to your local Member of Parliament as follows:

Parliament of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario- K1A 0A9.  No postage is necessary!

The link for the government MP listings when updated, is here.

“Bloggers are in an entirely different position: They tend to be mavericks who work for free, and operate far from the sources of power. Feeling no need to ingratiate themselves with the movers and shakers of industry and government, they simply tell it like it is from where they sit as concerned, informed citizens with diverse areas of expertise. Though they don’t often have professional training as journalists, many of them exceed professional journalistic standards, because they answer to their consciences alone rather than to corporate honchos and fund managers. We need to hear from such people, and the fact that there are more blogs out there worth reading than anyone has time to read, is a hopeful sign.”

“In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”George Orwell


Canada’s Federal Election

Canadians Betrayed By Politicians

Lester B. Pearson – A Communist Spy?

New CHINESE Political Party in Canada


“News” Vs Propaganda

Turn Your Television OFF

Mass Media: Smoke & Mirrors

INTERNET: Last Bastion of the Free Press


C.B.C. & The Immigration Question

Mass Mind Control Through MSM

Related articles

The White Riddle

Anti-racist rally in Sydney 2005 Dec 18

By Robert Whitaker

“Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem.

Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country… and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third-worlders and ‘assimilating’ with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country…. and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem, and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this…. and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

“They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.”

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everybody


White Identity

[What’s the percentage (%) of WHITE people on Earth? Answer.]

[From the book: WHITE IDENTITY – Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century]

By Jared Taylor


The American civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s was based on the assumption, that consciousness of race is a prejudice that is learned from a prejudiced society. The movement’s goal was to eliminate racial prejudice and even consciousness of race, and build a society in which race would not matter.

That effort failed; generation after generation, race continues to matter.

And yet, official American assumptions about race—that it’s a trivial distinction…. it is our destiny to transcend — have not changed. The result is a stubborn gap between what Americans say and claim to think about race…. and how they act. This stark contrast is described in the first chapter of this book.

Though they seldom talk about it, at some level, most Americans know how little their behavior resembles what are supposed to be their ideals. The result is frustration, confusion, and not a little hypocrisy. I believe decades of frustration were behind the wishful thinking that surrounded the election of the first black American president in 2008.


There had already been a half century of effort. School integration, civil rights laws, affirmative action, the Great Society, Black History Month, the King holiday, black appointments to cabinet and Supreme Court—all reflected a deep want to do away with distinctions of race.

Every institution and authority figure in the country condemns racism and urges that it be fought on all fronts. The United States has poured more moral energy into improving race relations than into anything else in its history.

And yet, in November 2008, race was still the American dilemma. The fact that it was still a dilemma despite so much effort fostered something like a yearning for miracles. That yearning gained force with every step Mr. Obama took towards the White House and reached a climax at his inauguration.


The Gallup organization recorded a huge spike in optimism about American race relations at the time of the inauguration, but one year later it found that “optimism about race relations is now almost identical to where it was 46 years ago, when Gallup first asked the question”.

This book tries to explain why there have been no miracles. It does so by examining the enduring phenomenon of racial consciousness. For many Americans—probably most Americans—race remains an unspoken consideration in decisions about where to live, what schools to attend, what clubs to join, whom to marry, and what parts of town to avoid at night.

The closer we look at how Americans live, the more clearly we see how much race continues to matter. At the same time, the moral imperative of the civil rights movement—that race should mean nothing—remains so strong that many whites deny, even to themselves, that race plays any role in these decisions.

We insist that diversity is a great strength, but for most Americans this is mere lip-service. They rarely seek diversity in their personal lives, living instead in homogeneous islands that look nothing like the racial and cultural mix this country has become. Anti-discrimination laws ensure integration at work, at school, and in public, but in private…. the races generally separate. A dinner party, poker game, wedding reception, church service, or backyard barbecue is rarely a multi-racial mosaic. When they are beyond the reach of the law, Americans revert to the patterns of segregation the law forbids.

Why is this? Chapters 2 and 3 of this book, together with the scientific findings reported in Chapter 4, should leave no doubt that diversity is not a source of strength ….but a [continuing] source of conflict.

Americans live a contradiction that makes it difficult to talk honestly about race. There is probably no other subject about which there is a greater divergence between what is said publicly and thought privately, or between official pronouncements and personal behavior.

At least that is true for whites. Chapters 5 and 6 explore the open rejection by Blacks and Hispanics of the civil-rights ideal of transcending race. For many minorities, race or ethnicity is central to their identity.


Non-white racial/ethnic solidarity is an entrenched part of the political landscape, and the pressure tactics to which it gives rise have been very successful. As we will see in Chapter 7, Asians are now adopting the same tactics. Non-white leaders are so accustomed to promoting [their] explicitly racial interests, that they would be dumbfounded at the suggestion that they should broaden their horizons and work for all Americans.


Chapter 8 describes the radical transformation of white racial attitudes that has occurred in the last half century. Up until the 1950s, most white Americans felt the same kind of racial identity that is common among non-whites. These sentiments have almost completely disappeared—certainly from public sight.

No politician would dare examine legislation by asking what was in it for whites. No city in America has a WHITE firefighters’ union or a WHITE caucus on the city council. Across the political spectrum, Americans assert that any form of white racial consciousness or solidarity…. is despicable.

Whites, therefore, have tried to keep their end of the civil rights bargain. They have dismantled and condemned their own racial identity in the expectation that others will do the same.

Why, though, is it so hard to build a society in which race does not matter? To the extent that Americans even ask themselves this question, they would say that it is because Americans—whites, especially—have not tried hard enough. And yet, how much harder can a people try? Today, after 50 years of trying, most whites cannot muster much more than exhausted resignation in the face of reports on school resegregation and yawning gaps in test scores or poverty rates.


If diversity is a source of tension, are there risks in basing policies on the assumption that it is a strength? If non-white groups continue to advance race-based interests, is it wise for whites to continue to act as if they have none?

The ideal of moving beyond race still appeals to the most whites. They dream of an America where there is no such thing as racial conflict, in which all Americans work together for common goals. They love to quote Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech about judging people by “the content of their character”.

And yet, two generations after that speech was delivered, how many blacks judge whites by the content of their character? And when whites take a wrong turn off the freeway, do they lock their car doors because they can read the character of the people on the sidewalk?


Is it possible that our racial ideals assume that people should become something they cannot?

If most people prefer the company of people like themselves, what do we achieve by insisting that they deny that preference?

If diversity is a weakness and not a strength, why work to increase diversity?

I believe that mistaken assumptions about race are leading us in dangerous directions. Merely to raise these questions, however, is to dissent from the deeply held convictions of many thoughtful Americans—and they are more than mere convictions. For many Americans, perhaps even most Americans, they are the foundations of morality; even to question the assumptions of the civil-rights vision is illegitimate.

Of course, we can never speak honestly about race if the majority brooks no dissent. There cannot be dialogue if doubters are thought to be not merely mistaken but immoral. In fact, it is a sign that the defenders of orthodoxy are unsure of their ground when they close their ears to disagreement. Real solutions to real problems need honest discussions, and honest discussion comes at a cost. As Thomas Paine said: “He who dares not offend cannot be honest”.


Attorney General Holder was right to say Americans are cowards about race. But he was wrong about why. White Americans are cowards, but not because they are unwilling to admit guilt and atone for the past. They are cowards because they fear that any departure from carefully scripted opinions about race—to suggest, for example, that the very fact of multi-racialism gives rise to serious problems no matter what whites do—will be met with charges of racism.

And they are right. Charges of “racism” are not a form of debate; they are meant to silence debate. Accusations of racism are often transparent attempts to choke off honest discussion.

This book is an attempt to understand race relations as they are—not as we might wish them to be. We cannot understand the world we live in if we refuse to reconsider assumptions that may be wrong. Nor can we make progress if we are knocked off course for fear that others may call us names.

Reexamining our assumptions about race could have far-reaching consequences, which are explored in the last chapter. Disturbing as such a reexamination may be, it will help us understand the choices our country faces today and the choices we made in the past. We can continue down a path that is likely to ensure tension and social dislocation—or we can reorient policies in more realistic directions.

This book is about racial identity, something most people who are not white take for granted. They come to it early, feel it strongly, and make no apologies for it.

Most American whites do not have a strong sense of racial identity. But they would do well to understand what race means for others.

They should also ponder the consequences of being the only group for whom such an identity is forbidden and who are permitted no aspirations as a group.

These questions—certainly the most controversial in this book—are taken up in the final chapter.  Source



Diversity Is A Fraud

Affirmative Action In Action

Affirmative Action Contradictions

WHITE Americans – An Endangered Species


EuroCanadian News

Suicide of the White Race

Is Burlington TOO WHITE?

Emboldened Minorities Eye Canada

“A Racial Program For the 20th Century”


Importing Jamaican “Culture”

Black Culture Retarding White Kids