“Racist” Pre-School Children

McGill University Campus Arts Building 853 She...
Arts Building, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec

Tristin Hopper, National Post

Along with finger-painting and story time, Canadian preschools are also spilling over with ethnic tension, according to a study released by Concordia University.

“We found Asian-Canadian and French-Canadian (White) children seemed to prefer interacting with kids of the same ethnic background,” said report co-author Nadine Girouard in a Tuesday release.

At mixed-race daycares throughout Montreal, researchers took Asian-Canadian children and French Canadian (White) children, ranging in age from 3 to 5 years old, and paired them up in rooms with “attractive toys” such as a marble track, or a Sesame Street-themed playhouse.

When put in with members of the same race, children happily played together. When mixed with different races, however, the children usually opted to play alone. Preschoolers “express a preference for same-ethnic interactions,” reads the study.

The revelation is nothing new. For more than 60 years, psychologists have been finding evidence of barely-toilet-trained children exhibiting prejudicial tendencies.

In the late 1940s, American psychologists Kenneth and Mamie Clark tried to gauge the inherent prejudices of children by showing them black and white dolls and asking which was better. Whether the child was White or black, the child “indicated a clear-cut preference for White.” “It is clear that the Negro child, by the age of five is aware of the fact that to be colored in contemporary American society is a mark of inferior status,” the pair wrote.

Their research was ultimately a factor in the 1954 US Supreme Court Decision to de-segregate public schools. In subsequent American studies, researchers have found black and white children self-segregating as early as kindergarten.

[Read: Students Learn To “White Flight” ]

Prejudice in children first starts to crop up right around the age of three or four (years), says Frances Aboud, a McGill University psychology professor specializing in the development of “racism” in children. The first time children come up against different ethnicities, their initial reaction is “nobody in my family looks like that,” says Ms. Aboud. “Sometimes kids even go so far as to say that a child is intentionally trying not to look like him,” she says.


The Montreal study attributes the rift between the Asian-Canadian and French Canadian (White) children to nothing more than cultural awkwardness. Rather than being driven apart by animosity, the two groups are simply baffled by one another. Raised in a culture of social restraint, the Asian-Canadian children were more likely to try to interact non-verbally with the French-Canadians by silently “cooperating” in playing with a toy. French-Canadian children, meanwhile, would try to engage their Asian-Canadian playmates in conversation. After a few confusing minutes, the two children usually found it easier to part ways….. and play in silence.

(….and now, the politically-correct “however” salve is applied … so as not to hurt anyone’s feelings… ELN Editor.)

However, the “beauty” of the Montreal study, says Ms. Girouard, is that the Asian-Canadians and French-Canadians ultimately learned to overcome their differences and play together. “Children found mutually satisfactory and effective means of engaging one another,” reads the study. Once-subdued Asian-Canadians began to talk louder and (White) French-Canadians responded by quieting down. “Each was able to import the culture of the other,” says Ms. Girouard. “Children, regardless of their ethnicity, want to play together and understand each other.”  –Source


“Racism”  Is Not Sinful

Race Diversity – But Why?

Is Racial Separation Immoral? 

Is Racial Diversity Good for Canada?


Racial Diversity – A CON Game

The Dreaded “Racist” Label


Minority Whites Fighting Back

Students Learn To “White Flight”

Black Culture Retarding White Kids

British Schools Brainwashing Students



  1. Pingback: ELLIOT LAKE News
  2. Liberal idiots, always ignoring basic biology.

    Small children, largely un-acculturated as yet, self-segregate be cause evolution tells us that a creature that looks similar to us but not the same as us is the creature most likely to be a threat to us.

    The children later got along partially because exposure and time showed their hind-brains that the “other’ posed no threat.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s