“Evalion” is a young, intelligent 18 yr. oldCanadian teenager having the capacity for thought and reasoning abilities usually demonstrated by those older than herself. She boldly speaks her mind on a variety of political-incorrect topics.
Have you ever seen anything like the sudden war on the Confederate Flag? Just like the gay marriage issue … it’s appeared like a thunderbolt out of nowhere. Right now it’s the most urgent item on the agenda. All manifestations must be eradicated. Immediately. And why?
Well the ostensible reason is the hurt it be causin’ dose po’ black folk. The Legacy of Slavery, you know. Now it could be argued that dem po’ black folk – none of whom ever experienced slavery – be living high on the hog for the last fifty years on reparations from those who never owned a slave. But as Ronald Reagan used to say, let’s not talk about that.
So let’s talk, instead, about who actually owned those slaves. Here’s some information derived from the peer-reviewed research project entitled Black Masters: A Free Family of Color in the Old South, by Michael P. Johnson and James L. Roak By the early 1700’s the huge number of free blacks prompted fears of a “Negro insurrection” leading to Virginia Colonial ordering the repatriation of freed blacks back to Africa. But many, if not most blacks, sold themselves to White masters so they would not have to go to Africa. Clever boys!
By 1830 there were 3,775 black families living in the South who owned black slaves. In 1830, a fourth of the free Negro slave masters in South Carolina owned 10 or more slaves; eight owning 30 or more. Black Duke University professor John Hope Franklin recorded that in New Orleans over 3,000 free Negroes owned slaves, or 28% of the free Negroes in that city. In 1860 there were at least six blacks in Louisiana who owned 65 or more slaves. The largest number, 152 slaves, were owned by the widow C. Richards and her son P.C. Richards. Another black slave-magnate in Louisiana — with over 100 slaves — was Antoine Dubuclet, the owner of a huge sugar plantation.
In Charleston, South Carolina in 1860, 125 free Negroes owned slaves; six of them owning 10 or more. Of the $1.5 million in taxable property owned by free Negroes in Charleston, more than $300,000 (20%) represented slave holdings. In North Carolina69 free Negroes were slave owners.
There are many other examples of black slave owners cited. Some of them even employed White overseers to manage their black slaves. Now, we also know that the proportion of slave-owning Whites in the Confederacy was probably as low as 3%. Sooo… the reality is that many blacks — like sated ticks from a lifetime feasting on White-provided “reparations” — may themselves be the descendants of (black) slave owners. While the antecedents of (today’s) unfortunate White mugs picking up the reparations tab … were almost certainly notslave owners. Isn’t that something else? Also see my post on The Great Slavery Wheeze. >Source
Guilt-ridden White Woman begging forgiveness from a black man for Black Slavery that ended 150 years ago. What utter foolishness!
Former liberal MEP Ojuland calls African refugees a “threat to white race” (210)
Kristiina Ojuland, a former Foreign Minister of Estonia and former member of the European Parliament, voiced her disapproval of the European Commission’s migrant quota plan on her official Facebook page, by calling for a pan-European campaign against admitting any refugees in the EU.
In a post that was more reminiscent of a far-right extremist, than a former Vice President of the European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party (ALDE), Ojuland said that the “white race is threatened” by dark-skinned immigrants (Ojuland actually used an Estonian word “neeger” which is not officially considered offensive in Estonia, but nevertheless becoming socially unacceptable).
“Today, yet again, I see a fully able young Negro begging for money in Italy, from people who have worked hard to earn a lunch. I think that we should start a pan-European campaign to collect signatures to ensure that not a single so-called refugee gets across the Mediterranean. Enough of this nonsense!” Ojuland, the former high-ranking politician who for years campaigned Estonia to join the EU, wrote.
Her posting has so far gathered over 2,000 “likes”, 500 shares and 300 comments. While many people pointed out her offensive remarks and some called her “racist”, one would have thought that the former foreign minister would back down, but it didn’t turn out to be so. Instead, Ojuland chose to rigorously defend her statement, and even went offensive against the moderate commentators who asked for common sense.
“Stop using a word ‘racist’! As a White person, I feel that the White race is threatened today! Are Estonians also so brain-washed now that they start talking some kind of politically correct bullshit?” Ojuland said. … read more.
“In the land of the blind … the one-eyed man is King“
Meaning that, even someone without much talent or ability is considered special by those with no talent or ability at all. In this case … in the land of South Africa the blind are the Black voters and the King is the ANC (ruling political party). The saying should continue as follows:
“In the land of the blind the one-eyed man is King, and insanity becomes the Queen“
That would sum up the ANC (African National Congress) very well. All their insane policies are killing the country slowly, and yet the blind cannot see. But they will feel. Yes sirree, they will feel.
The next insane hidden decision coming to SA soon, via the ANC, is a report into addressing and reflecting the national demographics at ESKOM, the state-owned electricity supplier. Dirk Hermann from Solidarity says, “Eskom must, not may or in a possible way, must have the country’s national demographics reflected on the 31st of March 2020 on every polished level in Eskom.” Not so, says the ANC, who have rubbished the suggestion that they will fire at least 3,389 Whites from ESKOM by 2020.
The ANC had the following to say:
“Instead, a principle of natural attrition has been used when certain positions became vacant,” the company said in a statement.
That would be ANC “goobly-gook” for — “when a White person leaves ESKOM, we replace them with anyone who isn’t White“. So, no forced firing then … just make it uncomfortable for the Whites, so they leave.
It would be at this point that I will remind you that ESKOM is drowning in the non-delivery of their product – electricity. This has been the outcome solely because the ANC appointed idiots into the revolving-door C.E.O. position for the last 20-odd years, and fired all the competent planners and managers. As one ANC cadre came into the CEO role and then left on a platinum-lined, golden hand$hake, the next one took his place, and so on and so on. No actual work was done regarding forward-planning because Blacks especially, aren’t very good at thinking about tomorrow … let alone today.
No, as long as the sun shines, then life is good. When it rains, then they’ll worry about that when it happens – no need to buy an umbrella in the meantime. It’s why they (Blacks) aren’t good farmers. To be a farmer takes tenacity, patience, intelligence and forward-thinking. The majority of Blacks lack all 4 genes.
But, not to worry. When 2020 arrives and South Africa is finally in the dark (which would suit the blind ANC voters), then the ANC will no doubt, fly in some more Cubans to save the day. And why not? Seeing as they’ve already flown in doctors, water-management ‘experts’ and diesel mechanics from Cuba to save the country, so the next logical step would be flying in some “sparkies”. After all, (Communist) Cuba is a “fantastic” role model that South Africa should strive to mirror.
It would make sense then, for other countries to snap up the unwanted White engineers and artisans. Or, so you would think. Actually, it would make sense to snap up the entire White conservative population of SA (Liberals to remain behind), and take them in as one big group. Just think how that (receiving) country would benefit from the brains, beauty and industriousness!
No… instead, our previous White countries would rather take in Muslims and Blacks as their next breeding and welfare stocks, because that’s the right “non-racist” thing to do. (See: 50 Million Blacks Invited To EUROPE)
Minority-White South Africans (8%) forced into extreme poverty by denying them jobs and welfare benefits.
I’m certain that many people in the (U.K.) United Kingdom feel extremely angry and resentful at the betrayal shown by successive governments, past and present, towards its own people.
It seems they have set out to deliberately destroy our once-great nation by post-war mass immigration, and this on-going genocidal act of colonisation has removed social cohesion and unity … replacing it instead with poverty and division.
Nobody, I’m convinced, could foretell that on the historical date of June 22nd 1948 when the Empire Windrush arrived at Tilbury docks, that the future of our country would be changed forever, beyond all recognition in the years to follow, and that large areas of our country would then descend into the multicultural ghettos that many of our major towns and cities now resemble today; further more, that we would become second-class citizens in our own lands, except for one man, Enoch Powell.
Enoch Powell, the then conservative member of parliament (1950–74) had the vision and the foresight to see what the future would hold, and had the courage to speak out and warn us in advance with his famous ‘rivers of blood’ speech on 20th April 1968; in response he was dismissed from his position as Shadow Defence Secretary in the cabinet of Edward Heath. This is a quote from that talk he gave at the Midland Hotel (later known as The Burlington Hotel) on New Street in Birmingham that day, which is as applicable now, as it was back then. [Update to 2013: Birmingham, Britain’s second largest city, also has the greatest number of schools, 22 in all, with ZERO (0) White pupils.]
“We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependents, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre”. (Spoken in 1968 … whereas today’s immigrant influx is about a half-million every year. More updated facts are found at: Migration Watch UK right side-bar)
Mad indeed … and who can argue with those words made back in 1968 by one of the greatest politicians this country has ever had. Our once great country, particularly in urban areas, has descended into crime ridden third-worldsqualor, poverty and corruption, not to mention the gangland violence, rape and of course ‘ethnic division‘ bestowed upon us … by the ruling elite.
Primitive African tribalism marching on British Streets
Our forefathers — who fought and died in numerous world wars for their country — would be turning in their graves at the sight of Britain circa 2013. Those same brave men and women who put their lives on the line for Queen and country, would no doubt, be horrified at the travesty and injustice served upon them by the traitors in parliament today, if they were alive to see it.
What we now find is that the native British, particularly the White working-classes, are having to compete for housing and jobs, and who quite understandably feel ostracised from mainstream society. Social housing is allocated it appears, first and foremost to the newly arrived immigrants that have turned up on our shores, while the indigenous people are left to stagnate on long housing lists with no hope of securing affordable accommodation in the mean time.
The irony here is that those who are already housed can’t wait to move out from their ‘culturally enriched’ areas. Incidentally, people often described the satellite towns around our capital as ‘London overspill’ and I now feel that the term has some relevance to an early version of White flight, I’m sure a quick chat to any displaced Londoner would confirm this but the Daily mail on the other hand, would have us believe it is more to do with affluence and success, when in reality the complete opposite is true.
Many people sadly feel the need leave their homes and move out of the “culturally enriched” areas, especially London where they are now (a White) minority, as they could no longer relate or identify with the area they were brought up in, so they have upped sticks and left. I doubt very much it was by choice.
Enoch Powell quoted a letter that he had received from an elderly woman in Wolverhampton street, Northumberland, which summed it up well.
The woman was the only White resident, and had lost her husband and her two sons in World War II. She had rented out the rooms in her house but once immigrants had moved into the street she was living in, her White lodgers left. The letter went on to say that two black men had knocked on her door at 7:00 am to use her telephone but she refused, as she would have done to any other stranger knocking at her door at such an hour, and was subsequently verbally abused. She had asked her local authority for a rates reduction, but was told by a council officer to ‘let out’ the rooms of her house. When the woman said the only likely tenants would be black, the council officer replied: “Racial prejudice won’t get you anywhere in this country“. I often wonder what happened to that poor lady and how she felt about the hostile treatment she received back in 1968; the same anti-white, pro-multicultural attitudes people have to endure today, if they dare to speak out.
Our politicians these days are not content with helping our own people gain employment, or offering them training for particular skills needed, or to attain meaningful careers. Instead they continue to allow the flood gates to be opened to thousands of foreigners to increase an already competitive jobs market.
The NHS (National Health Service) and all public sector employers are prime examples of organisations who will favour immigrants over the natives, regardless of merit, if only to fill immigrant job quotas – the other beneficiary’s being private corporations and business’, who now have an endless supply of cheap labour to work for the minimum wage. Those lucky enough to secure employment now have to suffer pay freezes, zero hour contracts, and the depression of wages.
A newspaper article, not so long ago, gave us a small insight into how people are struggling to survive. A young couple with no children who were both in full-time work were having to rely on the charity ‘food bank‘ to make ends meet, and I’m sure there are many similar cases to this example.
Many people, because of the minimum wage, are better off receiving benefits, and I’m sure many take this route because it is economically a more viable option, and who can blame them.
The cries of the ‘Brits are lazy‘ is common place, usually made by the more affluent members of society, the ones born with a silver spoon in their mouths, and these same people are lucky enough to have received a good education, and enjoy the benefits of higher paid jobs … but hasn’t that always been the case?
Our education system is not fit for purpose – over sized classrooms and teachers who now have to accommodate numerous different languages in the classroom is hardly the best environment to gain an education. But isn’t that their modus operandi in maintaining the status quo of a ready supply of dumbed down proletariat who — for the most part, have to work hard all their lives just to make ends meet, with no chance of ever increasing their social standing? Many people I know are struggling just to keep a roof over their heads, let alone feed and clothe themselves – not forgetting the ever increasing utility bills.
The deafening ignorance of the liberal left and all political parties towards the plight of their fellow countrymen and women is sickening to say the least, but to be expected. These anti-white, pompous, egocentric perverts with their lust for subversion of society through the promotion of homosexuality and the other distorted views they have on sexuality, means you can only conclude that the lunatics have really taken over the asylum in this country. These same perverts who despise the majority in this country, the White working class, with their multiracial, multicultural agenda and constant bleating on that immigration is a benefit to us all, are the same people who enjoy all the benefits of cheaper nannys and cheaper plumbers, whilst earning their six figure salaries in their cushy jobs.
Try explaining that immigration is a “good thing” to the numerous victims of Asian (Indian or Pakistani) paedophile gangs, immigrant crimes, and murders against the indigenous British. Explain to them … why they must now compete not only for jobs that pay a pittance, but also for affordable housing, too.
The freedom loving 1960s in White Britain
These are the same people whose forefathers fought and died for this country so that future generations could enjoy a better standard of living. The stench of hypocrisy from the filth that preach from their ivory towers situated in affluent White suburbs is overbearingly nauseating, and still, unbelievably, the sheeple trot out every polling day and continue to vote for these parasitic, bottom feeding scum, why? — ‘because I’ve always voted labour‘ — you hear them cry, or because ‘my parents voted for them‘.
It’s like someone repeating the same experiment over and over again and expecting a different result, for goodness sake, only a mad man would do this! Source: >The British Resistance
This is DUBLIN, IRELAND??
Discover how other WHITE Nations are “enjoying the benefits” of Multi-Racialism.
A Black family born in a White-ruled nation is forced to live in poverty-stricken conditions because:
1) … the unemployed father is DENIED his sovereign right to lawfully seek employment in the nation’s job market because of his swarthy complexion. “Employment-equity/affirmative action” exists to serve only the White majority population … not the Black minority.
2)… the Black family is DENIED access to social welfare benefits and forced to live “rough” on city streets, or in makeshift, unsanitary squatter camps without running water, nor with proper toilet facilities, nor electricity. And, many others are forced to live in rural barns alongside pigs and other farm animals.
Additionally, and further out into the country’s expanse of rural farmland, hard-working Black farmers and their families are systematically being slaughtered to death without remorse by marauding, blood-thirsty White murderers plundering their isolated homes. The Black Women and children are often raped and tortured in the most gruesome, gut-wrenching manner.
Now … you’d be correct to ask … something is not quite right here?!
…and you’d be correct in your assumption.
BUT — by REVERSING the RACIAL components of these described events — this is actually happening to the WHITE-minority in today’s Black-ruledSouth Africa.
In fact, many North American and European household pets (cats and dogs) enjoy a higher standard of living than what impoverished Whitepeople have in South Africa.
You will not find these noteworthy stories reported in western newspapers, or by listening to your television news reader … so read on and validate this deliberately suppressed news for yourself.
WARNING: Gruesome photos of MURDERED White South Africans.
(Note:The term “Afrikaners” (Boer) refers to WHITE PEOPLE born and raised in South Africa … whose first language is Afrikaans and whose original ancestors were Dutch-Europeans … the very White people responsible for inventing, building and successfully establishing the nation itself.)
Back in July 2005, Professor Andrew Fraser received national attention in Australia with a letter to his local newspaper — signed with his academic title — in which he claimed that importing Sudanese refugees threatened to turn Australia into “a colony of the Third World” and stated: “Experience everywhere in the world shows us that an expanding BLACK population is a sure-fire recipe for increases in crime, violence and other social problems“.
Macquarie University responded by distancing itself from Professor Fraser’s remarks, but supported his right to say what he wished in a responsible way. The acting Vice-Chancellor, Professor John Loxton, stated there was no place for “racism” at the university, but it “recognises and protects academic freedom as essential to the conduct of teaching, research and scholarship“.
Fraser was accused of being affiliated with White “Supremacist” groups, including the Patriotic Youth League (PYL), by the anti-racist group FightDemBack. Although both he and the PYL initially denied any connection, Fraser admitted he had attended PYL meetings and signed up to the PYL website after video footage of a PYL member describing him as an official legal adviser surfaced.
Following an outcry from Sydney’s Sudanese community, Macquarie University Vice-Chancellor Dianne Yerbury on July 29, 2005 decided to suspend Fraser from teaching any further at the campus on the grounds that the race debate was “threatening to spill over into the classroom” and was “affecting the university’s ability to operate effectively.”  Macquarie University offered to pay out the final year of his contract, but Fraser declined, describing the offer as a “dishonorable discharge“.
On this incident, Fraser wrote:
“Truth is no longer a defence when it comes to charges of academic deviance. Instead of an invitation to debate the issues, the Vice-Chancellor’s office sought to get me off campus as soon as possible by offering to buy out my contract. The head of Human Resources made it clear to me that my public comments were damaging their efforts to market Macquarie University to foreign students. When I refused the offer on the grounds that it amounted to a dishonourable discharge, VC Di Yerbury, ordered that I be suspended from teaching. This was justified on the specious grounds that the safety of students supposedly ‘had been threatened by’, among others, my supporters! For what must be the first time in academic history, alleged threats by outsiders to disrupt classes were met, not by tightening security to deal with the disrupters, but by getting rid of the disruptee”.
In August 2005, more than 300 Macquarie University staff and students attended a forum on “racism” and free speech, at which Fraser (as well as the Sudanese community, and university members) was allowed to put his views from the floor.
Fraser’s suspension ended in mid-2006, when an early-retirement package took effect.
In September 2005, Professor Fraser wrote an article advocating a return of the White Australia Policy, entitled “Rethinking the White Australia Policy“. The article was set to be published in the law journal of Deakin University, but the University directed the journal not to publish it. “Rethinking the White Australia Policy” has since been published and circulated across the internet.
In the controversial article, Fraser wrote:
“Given the relentless and revolutionary assault on their historic national identity, White Australians now face a life-or-death struggle to preserve their homeland. Whether effective resistance to their displacement and dispossession can be mounted … is another question. Unlike other racial, ethnic or religious groups well-equipped to practice the politics of identity, White Australians lack a strong, cohesive sense of ethnic solidarity. As a consequence, ordinary Australians favouring a moratorium on NON-white immigration cannot count on effective leadership or support, from their co-ethnics among political, intellectual and corporate elites. On the contrary, our still predominantly Anglo-Australian rulers are indifferent; some profit from, and others actually take pride in their active collaboration with the 3rd-World colonization of Australia. None of the major parties, indeed, not one member of the Commonwealth Parliament, offers citizens the option of voting to defend and nurture Australia’s Anglo-European identity. The problem, in short, is clear: The Australian nation is bereft of a responsible ruling class”.
In December 2005, Fraser further criticised multiracialism in Australia by writing an article regarding the 2005 Cronulla riots, entitled “Diversity vs. Freedom: Australians Fight On The Beaches.” As with the full version of “Rethinking the White Australia Policy“, the article was only published on the internet, namely on the US-based webzine VDARE.
A complaint from the Sydney’s Sudanese community about the original newspaper letter was upheld on 31 March 2006 by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, on whose direction Fraser reluctantly apologised for his remarks.
Andrew Fraser addressed the American Renaissance Conference in February 2006, alongside speakers such as Nick Griffin of the British National Party and Professor J. Philippe Rushton. This was followed up later in the year with appearances at the Inverell political forum in March, and at the Sydney Forum in August alongside speakers who included Jim Saleam of the Australia First Party.
In an article for Alternative Right entitled “The Cult of “The Other“”, Professor Fraser warned that academic freedom was being stifled in Australian universities. He wrote:
“Academic freedom in Australia is dying before our eyes; another sacrifice performed in the now holy name of “The Other.” In the universities, as elsewhere, public criticism of privileged minorities must walk a shaky legal tightrope, unfortunately, in a mass-mediated wasteland of intellectual cowardice and political conformity, Australian universities are not an oasis of dissent. If my experience as a teacher, scholar, and, more recently, a first-year theology student is a reliable guide, academia is utterly hostile to free thought and frank discussion on race, ethnicity, and gender“. >Source