“Oh Canada”, Ripe For The Taking

End Mainland China’s Colonisation of Canada –Part 2, Sidewinder Report

Part 2 – SIDEWINDER REPORT

Communist Chinese Flag

By David Barswell

Since the rush to escape Hong KongCommunistfriendly politicians of Chinese origin —  supported by Chinese political organizations, have emerged in Canada at the same time that Canadian politicians have been co-opted … often quite openly. 

Indeed, our major political parties regularly vie with each other for immigrant bloc votes, and our foreign policy is now often determined by “domestic concerns” rather than by sober consideration of Canada’s best interests.

Many of these pliable politicians — domestic and imported — have worked knowingly or unknowingly in co-ordination with PLA intelligence operatives and others to obtain economic and political favour for China with a succession of Prime Ministers and Premiers, trade organizations, school boards and others.  Both Justin Trudeau and Stephen Harper have openly praised China, and endeavoured to expand trade links.

Trudeau (left) & Harper

Chinese agents have been successfully inserted into key industries, such as Ontario Hydro, with the intention of stealing nuclear and other technological secrets and handing them over to PLA intelligence operatives.



In 2000, we were told that “Chinese spies stole Canadian nuclear secrets to build a pirate copy of a research reactor invented at federal laboratories in Chalk River, Ontario …. China is (now) marketing its cheap clone around the world” (5). In  2003, it was revealed that well over 3000 Chinese “spy companies” were operating in Canada and the U.S. (6).


Considerable success has been obtained in having Chinese exchange students reap the full benefit of Canada’s advanced educational system before taking their new-found knowledge back to the mainland, together with the insertion of propaganda organizations such as the China Education Association (Canada) (7), and the Confucius Institute network (8). 

There has been some resistance to the latter from primarily Chinese parents. The Toronto District School Board terminated its relationship with the Confucius Institute just last year.

Equally of concern are the Chinese Triads — or organised crime groupings — which are found throughout North America as well as the Far East. Sidewinder describes them as being particularly active in Vancouver, with involvements in murder, kidnapping, gambling, and loan sharking.

Sidewinder identifies the overseas Chinese diaspora as

“a borderless nation, united by ties of family, clan, language and motherland.  It is estimated that there are some 60 Million Overseas Chinese who contribute much to the overall strength of their ancestral homeland, providing ready-made linkages and networks (guanxi) for legal and illegal business.”


This combination of economic and political penetration threatens Canadian security and democracy in a number of ways, and the connivance of a succession of administrations in Ottawa has now culminated in our present Immigration Minister recently announcing that while in China two months ago, he lobbied officials to double or even triple the number of Canadian  visa application centres in China in an effort to open more doors for Chinese students, workers and tourists (9).

It should therefore be of little surprise to learn that the Red Chinese flag was recently raised by the “Canadian Alliance of Chinese Associations” at Vancouver City Hall with Councillor Kerry Jang officiating, accompanied by Richmond East MP Joe Peschisolido – both wearing red scarves – to mark Chinas National Day. Chinese Communist flag raised in Vancouver  Story HERE.

Predictably, when questions were raised about this, Jang responded “It’s rooted in ignorance and racism… To them it doesn’t matter if it’s a Communist government in China, they’re just anti-Chinese” – this, despite the fact that the primary complaints came from Chinese residents of the city.

It’s time to stand up for Canada, and to put an end to the colonisation of Canada by the Communist Chinese.  SOURCE: Immigration Watch Canada

The Sidewinder Report,  >> PART 1.

Also read:

Emboldened Minorities EYE Canada

New Zealanders AGAINST Asian Invasion

“They Are So Stupid”

Canada’s Immigration boss wants to spread Chinese newcomers “evenly”

By Jeff Goodall

John McCallum / Vancouver, British Columbia

“(Immigration Minister) John McCallum recently returned from a trip to China, where he lobbied officials to double or even triple the number of visa application centres in the country in an effort to open more doors for Chinese students, workers and tourists… However, he acknowledged there are limits to the government’s ability to disperse migrants, as once people become permanent residents they have a constitutional right to move wherever they want.” (1).

Precisely! This is just puffery and window-dressing in an attempt to hide deliberate actions which constitute a staggering threat to Canadian security, as China will now find it even easier to install intelligence assets and set up spying infrastructure in Canada.

To keep things in perspective … read the hushed-up and then leaked June 1997 “Sidewinder Report” (2).

The Chinese don’t come here (to Canada) for our benefit … they come here for theirs. If it isn’t stashing the wife and kids with welfare and free schooling in a massive investment property in Vancouver, or buying citizenship – and a Canadian passport – by putting money up as a “business investment” without even bothering to live here, those who do actually move and live here have spent decades forming their own insulated communities with the intention of achieving “critical mass” – that is, being able to live, work and play in Mandarin, without ever having to speak a word of English.

{Population of China>> 1,379,000,000 (BILLION)

Population of Canada>>>> 36,000,000 (Million)}

This is colonization … not immigration!

For some reason — the fact that I am an immigrant myself means that immigrants of other races will often open up to me — even though I identify with Canada on purely racial grounds. A Chinese bank teller I saw frequently while working for Metropolitan Toronto, after I told her I was from England, shook her head and whispered confidentially they are so stupid” — referring to the Canadian government and its policies.

  Justin Trudeau

I agree with her entirely. Both the Liberals and Conservatives have been in a mad race to pump Canada full of unwanted foreigners, ranging from people who are competitive at best, or rapacious at worst, to nonproductive third-worlders for whom we have to spend billions on public housing and welfare.   >>read MORE.

Also read:

Canadians Duped On Multiculturalism

False Arguments Given For (“Needed”) Population Growth

*****

New CHINESE Political Party in Canada

Selling Out OUR Nation

Paying for Our Own Demise: Euro-Canadians Fund “Multicult” Canada

Multicultural policy in Canada has led to a situation, whereby the Canadian public are funding the demise of their own culture. 

by Paul Bradley

They’re telling you:Forget your history, Europeans … envision a future Canada without Whites.’

[The way we were BEFORE mass 3rd-world, non-white immigration: City of Toronto – Yonge St. PHOTOS circa 1970s]

In 1988, multiculturalism in Canada officially became government policy. This was the year the policy became entrenched in our constitution, thereby completing a seventeen year long transition from political ideology to legislated government policy.

Within Canadian society, this is fairly common knowledge. What may be less well known is that on an international scale, constitutionally-based multiculturalism is a rarity. In fact, only two nations in the world have such a policy: Canada and Australia. While many countries promote the concept of diversity, a mere (1%) of the world’s nations are officially multicultural.

At present, Canada has the highest per-capita immigration rates in the world. In conjunction with legislated multiculturalism, the impact upon our nation has been profound — so profound, it is arguable the long-term result will be a complete reinvention of Canadian society.

Multiculturalism and the Shifting Demographic Balance

White man smiling at his own replacement cohorts

For decades, Canadians have been informed by government that multiculturalism is equitable, and beneficial to all. Is this really the case? The answer, one which may surprise a great number of Canadians … is absolutely not.

The reason for this cannot be found simply by reading the statute’s content — though it does contain explicit wording which validates its negative impact — but rather, in the degree to which external circumstances surrounding the policy have changed.

One of the most relevant issues is the manner in which our society has defined the word “minority” — as in one of Canada’s minority communities. In 1988, the definition was relatively straight forward. The reasons for this are simple enough: in terms of overall population  these communities were clearly in the minority.

In this regard, however, things have obviously changed. Decades of large-scaleIMMIGRATION, particularly from Asia and the Middle East, have rendered the traditional meaning of the term irrelevant. Dozens of constituencies in Canada are majority non-white — for example Richmond, B.C., and Brampton, Ontario.

What is the difference between a country like the U.S., who promote “diversity”, and a country such as Canada, which has the official policy? The answer isMONEY — as in monetaryFUNDING — as in the fact that multicultural policy mandates that our tax payer dollars … hundreds of millions of them, be given to ethnic and multicultural organizations to promote their specific culture and identity.

Is this necessarily unfair, or harmful? No, unless a situation were to develop whereby the so-called “minority” becomes the dominant population within the host community. In 2014, this was the case in twenty-six out of Canada’s 308 political ridings. A number of additional ridings will soon find themselves in a similar situation.

Let us consider the ramifications of this new reality. Canadians of European descent are now minorities within these twenty-six ridings — and yet hundreds of millions of dollars are still being funnelled to multicultural organizations to promote their cultural agendas — despite the fact they are no longer minorities at all. On the flip side, the freshly-minted Caucasian-minorities receive nothing. Even more disconcerting, is the fact that when citizens point out the inequality of the present system, the pro-multicultural forces play what is known as the “race card”.

What is this curious phrase all about? In basic terms, playing the race card occurs when multicultural leaders accuse those who question the funding, or any other aspect of multicultural orIMMIGRATION policy, of behaving in a “racist” manner. Lacking a sound, logical rebuttal, they deliver the only tool they have in their arsenal: the race card. Thus far, it has proven to protect their interests successfully. The positive news is, however, the general public are beginning to understand the insidious world of what can most appropriately be called “Multicult” Canada.

The Diversity Industry

Multiculturalist advertisement

To comprehend the full scope of the Multicult’s influence upon our society, we must first realize that the agenda is not served up on a platter for all to understand. It is very much a hidden operation, and not intended for general public understanding. For instance, is the public aware of multiculturalism’s influence within our institutions of higher learning? They certainly should be. Hundreds of millions of dollars are being provided to our largest universities for the purpose of promoting non-democratic political ideology to Canadian-born students. That is, the few of them still walking the halls of University of Toronto, McGill, or University of British Columbia. UBC’s own data tells us the percentage of Canadian-born students on campus is eroding at a rapid pace, largely due to the fact that foreign students pay double, and even triple, the tuition fees of Canadian students.

As with our multicultural organizations, communism on campus is largely paid for by Canadian tax payers. Less commonly understood, is the fact, that a significant portion of the funding comes directly from China’s Ministry of Education. Bottom line? Canadian tax payers, along with the government of China, have paid for the establishment of “Asian Studies” departments throughout our university system. The most conspicuous example is our half-dozen branches of China’s Confucius Institute. There used to be more, however due to accusations that the organization is little more than a propaganda arm of China’s government, a number of universities have formally severed ties with the organization.

Throughout our business community, multiculturalism, or “diversity”, as the banking industry prefers to call it, is trumpeted within the board rooms of all major Canadian corporations. They can dress it up with a fancy word, but they cannot take away the fact that in reality, diversity meansHIRING a person based on their ethnicity, rather than their job qualifications. Even under these circumstances, pro-Multicult leaders and academics continue to bash White Canadians for having the nerve to be better qualified for jobs, or for having a full command of one of our official languages.

Multiculturalism in Canada has long become aMONEY-MAKINGindustry which is eradicating traditional Canadian culture, heritage and identity. Clearly, the situation is serious business. […] [M]ulticultural policy in Canada has led to a situation whereby the Canadian public are funding the demise of their own culture. Over half a billion dollars ($500,000,000) has been taken from tax payers and delivered to a relatively small collection of multicultural organizations, ostensibly for purposes of ethnic “cultural promotion”. At least, promoting their ethnicity is what they used to do. Today, the use of the money goes well beyond promotion, and is presently being utilized to undermine traditional Canadian identity, culture and religion, as well as our official languages.

It all sounds rather ominous. However, upon close inspection of the activities of organizations such as Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada SUCCESSIMMIGRANT SERVICES, Mosaic, and Canada-China Business Council — often in tandem with our real estate or banking industries — a tangible pattern of cultural erosion can be detected.

Growing Dissatisfaction among Disadvantaged Canadians

All the while, Canadians go about their daily business, the majority of whom are simply unaware of the multicultural power game playing out within their nation. There have been, however, some promising signs of change. Several articles which recently appeared in mainstream news (MSM) publications have helped expose the nation of China’s influence upon Canada’s real estate market. In Vancouver, a petition to regulate foreign real estate investment has gathered over 24,000 signatures. Most recently, a public rally took place to protest a growing lack of home affordability. Even Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson, an absolute champion of all-things-China, issued a public statement on the need for “something to be done” to help with home affordability for lower and middle income residents.

In short, Canadians are beginning to push back against enforced multiculturalism andIMMIGRATION — both of which were implemented without public input, or approval. Frankly, it is about time. The fact is, if the status quo is maintained for much longer … traditional Canadian culture, heritage and identity will become fully marginalized, and eventually eliminated.

Multiculturalism in Canada — what was once a policy, is today an industry, and if permitted, this industry will eradicate the very meaning of what it means to be Canadian.  (Some added emphasis by ELN Editor)    >Source
Also read:
Colonizing Canada Continues
Canada’s BLACK Population

Ethnic-Vote-Grovelling Politicians

By PaxCanadiana

If annual awards were given out for “Ethnic-Vote- Grovelling Politician of the Year“, B.C. (British Columbia) premier Christy Clark would be a front runner.

(Now that I think about it, I think we should get an award running, and present it to the winner merely as an act of protest, if not disgust. Canada’s largest province (Ontario) and city (Toronto) are in the midst of election campaigns, and promise to produce a bounty of potential nominations this year. The competition could be fierce.)

I don’t think anyone is stupid enough to believe – even those for whom this apology is directed at – that the apology this mediocre woman gave — is sincere (she lost her seat in the last election but was given a second chance by running in a by-election in a “sure-bet” riding).

Christy Clark is desperate for a political career, and the ethnic vote scandal pretty much forced her to apologize, if only as a publicity stunt to announce to all ethnic groups in B.C. that she’s their woman in Victoria (capital city). And, even though they may not believe her, it’s enough to know that they command enough power, that when they ask a politician to jump, they jump — and that’s the point of these demands.

But while she embarrasses herself, and sensible British Columbians as a whole, we should not be apologizing for the head tax at all. In truth, we should be demanding another (head-tax). And I’m not the only one who thinks so.

The parallels between the cheap Chinese labour of yesteryear, and the TFW (Temporary Foreign Worker) scandals of today, cannot be ignored.

The main target of the head-tax were those being imported as “indentured servants” by landed Chinese in the province, that which modern parlance calls “snake heads.”

The “snake heads” enriched themselves by exploiting the desperation of their countrymen back in China and importing them into Canada as indentured servants, all the while undercutting domestic Canadian labour in the province through the cheap labour on-offer by these Chinese immigrants. Canadians were on the losing-end of this unethical arrangement, yet Canada has to apologize for acting in a way to protect its (own) citizens from the negative effects. Welcome to the New Canada!

Fast forward to today and replace Chinese migrant labourer with TFW, and snakehead with (insert company name here), and you have the same situation one hundred years later.

Suggestions put forward to tackle the TFW scandal include demanding a premium on each TFW (Temporary Foreign Worker) by increasing application fees for each TFW and increasing fees for a LMO (Labour Market Opinion needed to justify the importation of a TFW) as financial disincentives to importing foreign workers.

While not being called a “head tax” the intended effects are the same: make it financially inconvenient to import foreign labour so that a domestic labour force is favoured and their standard of living isn’t undermined; foreign workers would only be sought in extreme cases.

If the Chinese feel they were being singled out at the time, it’s because they were the main cause of the problem (about 100 years ago). Today, it’s not just the Chinese, but a broader grouping under the TFW program. And like the Chinese then, TFWs are a problem, now.

But then again, what is the problem? Over 90% of the Chinese in Canada arrived after the post-WWII period anyway, and have been doing so with a colonizing vengeance.

They don’t seem to care to integrate, support Chinese politicians, and have pushed real estate prices into bubble territory in Canada’s major housing markets through speculative buying sprees. They haven’t been much of an economic boon to the country – if you don’t count condo construction projects and their negligible short-term economic benefits – and those that were supposed to be a boon turned out to be a bust.

If they’re not spying on us, they’re stealing from us or getting us hooked. And in their free-time they act like assholes, lie to us, and take advantage of us.

But hey, they’re proud “Canadians”. That’s why there’s 350,000 “Chinese-Canadians” in Hong Kong, working and not paying taxes in Canada to support the very social programs they and their settled families (in Canada) expect to benefit from.

Perhaps its Canada that deserves the apology, but if apologies are what they’re looking for, then why stop at Canada? Maybe they should hunt down the descendants of the Chinese snake-heads who exploited them in the first place and seek reparations, but something tells that that will never happen. No political advantage to be had in that.  >Source

Also read:

New “Chinese” Political Party (in Canada)

Emboldened Minorities Eye Canada

To Re-Create CHINA In Canada

New Zealanders Against Asian Invasion

********************************************

Advocate For Euro-Whites

********************************************

“Temporary” Foreign Workers (TFW)

Temporary Foreign Workers Vs Canadians

Immigrant Women Outbreeding Whites

By Douglas Todd

New immigrants to Canada are much more likely to have babies than their native-born counterparts.

Romania, Germany, Canada, Hungary

Immigrant women who have spent five (5) years in Canada “have almost TWICE as many children of preschool age (as) the average Canadian-born woman,” according to an extensive study by two noted economists.

The University of Waterloo‘s Ana Ferrer and Princeton University’s Alicia Adsera pored over two decades of Statistics Canada census data to reach their conclusion.

Country of birth of "immigrants and non-p...
Country of birth of “immigrants and non-permanent residents” in Canada in 2001 Census

There are major birthrate differences, depending on newcomers’ country of origin: The [immigrant] women who have the highest birthrates tend to be from Africa, Pakistan and India.

The study by Ferrer and Adsera – which explores how childbirth rates affect a family’s “economic assimilation” and other aspects of integration – aims to help governments and businesses respond to demographic changes in Canada, track the availability of workers of both sexes and adjust taxpayer-support services.

While many Canadians welcome more babies, seeing them as future contributors to economic expansion, children can be expensive for both families and taxpayer, who pay for health care, child-tax subsidies and education through Grade 12.

The study goes into detail about the child-birth patterns of the roughly 125,000 women who arrive each year in Canada, which has the highest per-capita immigration rate of any major country.

African and South Asian women show a substantially higher fraction of children under five than similar native-born women,” write Ferrer and Adsera.

They note that women from the Middle East quickly start out having babies after arriving in Canada, but eventually slow down to closer to the national norm.

The authors speculate that women between ages 18 and 45 from European and East Asian countries may worry more about what economists call the “opportunity costs of children,” since having children often reduces chances to increase income.

The authors surmise that women from Europe, China and other East Asian countries could place a different value on the “two-earner family model” than those from India, Africa, the Middle East and elsewhere.

national Flag of Canada

The findings of Ferrer and Adsera dovetail with earlier data from Statistics Canada, which showed that, based on ethnicity, the lowest fertility rates in Canada are among White, Chinese and South Korean women, all of whom fall below the national birthrate average of 1.6 babies per woman.   >Source

[The LOW percentage (%) of WHITE PEOPLE in the World? ANSWER.]

[For emphasis, all Underlined, bold print and italicized words are by ELN Editor.]

And the long-term implications are:

Importing JAMAICAN “Culture”

Blacks LESS Intelligent?

Importing BLACK Crime

********************

Canada’s ANCHOR Babies

Foreign “Visitors” As “Birth Tourists”

*********************************

Muslim Violence in Canada

Duped By Multiculturalism

Toronto Police Losing “Face”

*************************

Emboldened Minorities EYE Canada

Is Racial Diversity “Good” for Canada?

**********************************

… other Western Nations

U.S.  WHITES Outnumbered  in 30+ Years

… In BRITAIN, Too

Last Call for WHITE Britain