CANADIANS First, Eh?

11196296_10205871541379720_529599588150122690_n
*****


CANADA’s Immigration Minister thinks Alberta’s unemployment rate should be higher, our wages lower and our job fair line-ups longer.

John McCallum didn’t exactly say that, but what he did say will result in those economic conditions for (the province of) Alberta. After a closed door meeting with Alberta business people, McCallum said:

“There’s a strong consensus that they’re in favour of more immigrants, not less immigrants, notwithstanding the state of the economy”

Translation: Businesses want cheaper labour.

 

There are 77,000 (Unemployed) Albertans on employment insurance – some have already run out.  Alberta’s unemployment rate is at 8.6% … higher than the national average, and up a percentage point from the month before. Alberta’s youth unemployment rate is at 14.8% up from 11.4% the year before. These numbers are real people in our communities. They should not be duking it out for the few available jobs … with a sudden influx of economic (foreign) migrants. […]  Isn’t it a Canadian Minister’s job to put those Canadians first?  >>to FULL article.

Sample of “duking it out” — with an emboldened, foreign interloper in France.

Also read:

Useful Idiots

“They Are So Stupid”

Immigration boss wants to spread Chinese newcomers “evenly”

By Jeff Goodall

“(Immigration Minister) John McCallum recently returned from a trip to China, where he lobbied officials to double or even triple the number of visa application centres in the country in an effort to open more doors for Chinese students, workers and tourists… However, he acknowledged there are limits to the government’s ability to disperse migrants, as once people become permanent residents they have a constitutional right to move wherever they want.” (1).

Precisely! This is just puffery and window-dressing in an attempt to hide deliberate actions which constitute a staggering threat to Canadian security, as China will now find it even easier to install intelligence assets and set up spying infrastructure in Canada.

To keep things in perspective … read the hushed-up and then leaked June 1997 “Sidewinder Report” (2).

The Chinese don’t come here for our benefit, they come here for theirs. If it isn’t stashing the wife and kids with welfare and free schooling in a massive investment property in Vancouver, or buying citizenship – and a Canadian passport – by putting money up as a “business investment” without even bothering to live here, those who do actually move and live here have spent decades forming their own insulated communities with the intention of achieving “critical mass” – that is, being able to live, work and play in Mandarin, without ever having to speak a word of English.

{Population of China>> 1,379,000,000 (BILLION)

Population of Canada>>>> 36,000,000 (Million)}

This is colonization, not immigration.

For some reason — the fact that I am an immigrant myself means that immigrants of other races will often open up to me — even though I identify with Canada on purely racial grounds. A Chinese bank teller I saw frequently while working for Metropolitan Toronto, after I told her I was from England, shook her head and whispered confidentially they are so stupid” — referring to the Canadian government and its policies.

I agree with her entirely. Both the Liberals and Conservatives have been in a mad race to pump Canada full of unwanted foreigners, ranging from people who are competitive at best, or rapacious at worst, to non-productive third-worlders for whom we have to spend billions on public housing and welfare.   >>read MORE.

Also read:

Canadians Duped On Multiculturalism

False Arguments Given For (“Needed”) Population Growth

*****

New CHINESE Political Party in Canada

 

WHITE Americans – An Endangered Group

WHITE ALERT: Organize or Suffer the Consequences

By Mark Westerman

White Americans must act to promote and protect their legitimate interests.

Section one explains why organization is essential; section two proposes what forms the organization should take; and section three offers possibilities for personal action toward achieving those goals.

Section I

Very unpleasant consequences await us if we fail to organize. For the necessary motivation, we must fully appreciate the perils that loom ahead if we don’t change course.

Today, we hear that we possess something called “White privilege,” an unearned advantage which keeps all other groups under our thumb. But the reality is quite different. We now have an immigration policy that is dead set on making Whites, the historic majority of America — a minority within the next 25 years, or so. If current projections stay on course, our percentage of the population could sink to 40 percent or lower by the end of this century. Demography is indeed destiny, and this decline certainly will lead to loss of power and influence.

Whites at present, have more per capita wealth than Blacks and Hispanics, though somewhat less wealth than Asians. Our assets, however, are being transferred to Blacks and Hispanics through taxation to fund various social programs and welfare. At the same time, our earning power is being limited by so-called “affirmative action,” a policy of government-promoted racial discrimination against White Americans in the job market and education.

Its original justification was to provide an even playing field for Blacks because they had a claim on our conscience for past discrimination. But today the benefits of affirmative action go to all non-Whites, including immigrants and their descendants who have no historic claim on America at all. And among them are the Asians who already exceed Whites in average income.  >continue reading HERE.

Also read:

“White Pride” Denied Trademark

“Guilt-Tripping” White People

WHITES Are Going Extinct

Canada – BEFORE NON-white Immigration

by Ricardo Duchesne

Toronto Subway 1960s

Canada Becomes 96.8% WHITE: Immigration from 1914 to 1967

Most Canadians prior to WWII were not immigrants, but descendants of families born and created as a new people on the soil of Canada.

Many immigrants started to arrive after 1815 — particularly in the 1830s and 1840s — and between 1895 and 1914 — but the overwhelming number of these immigrants were compatriots from the British Isles … including some European Whites.

A family of Ukrainian immigrants in Quebec City 1897
UKRAINIAN settlers arriving in Quebec City – 1897
English: Arrival of immigrants at Union Statio...

EUROPEAN Settlers arrive at Union Station, Toronto, Canada. Circa 1910

We have also seen that if we were to abide by the dictionary definitions of “pioneer,” “settler,” and “immigrant,” rather than the newspeak of cultural Marxists, we would have to conclude that almost all the immigrants who came to Canada prior to 1914 (really prior to 1945) were pioneers and settlers…  rather than immigrants.

“… yesterday’s immigrants were handed nothing for free and they made no demands. [Unlike today,] they didn’t walk off the plane into a comfy, warm, tax-funded city apartment or motel room, meet with their tax-funded immigration lawyer, and start whining about their religious or cultural ‘rights‘.” >more HERE.

English: German immigrants at Quebec City, Canada.

GERMAN Settler family arrive at Quebec City,  1911
– NO free welfare, no free health care, no nothing! Father went to work immediately, or they went hungry!

It was only after WWII (1945) that immigrants, in the true sense of this word, began to arrive in Canada.

TORONTO – 1943   (Rare colour film -No sound)For FULL screen, click bottom-right box on video.

From 1914 to 1967, nevertheless, many of the immigrants were still British and almost all of them were White. I am designating these incomers as “immigrants,” not in a negative sense, but in the sense that they arrived to a country that was already built with British and French political institutions, values, languages, and religious traditions. These post-1945 immigrants did not settle in farmsteads or new frontiers … but in highly modernized cities. […]

In 1941 … 44% of immigrants in Canada were born in the British Isles. Canada’s population was 97.7 percent White, which is a higher proportion than in 1911, when it was 97% White. There were 170,241 Jews, 34,627 Chinese and 22,174 “Negroes.”

By 1950 … Canada was close to maturity … The old simplicity of the work of forest and field had been replaced by the highly complicated patterns of modern industrial living. The typical Canadians were no longer the settlers and pioneers seeking new homes in the wilderness, but farm-owners and wage earners searching for security in a country that was already built up (p. 401).

Finnish immigrants in Kanada

FINNISH immigrants in Canada – circa  late-1940s

 

read the FULL report at: EuroCanadian.ca

Also read:

Canada’s Black Population

Good Bye Sweden!

Class Photo – Elementary School in SWEDEN Today!
“Multiculturalism” code for White-ethnic cleansing!

 

(Click> centre-arrow to begin video)

Related “Sweden” posts:

Can Sweden Survive Multi-Racialism?

S.O.S. – Save Our Sweden

Sweden Tops In Rapes

*****

How To Destroy a Nation WITHOUT War

 

 

Importing Black African Crime

AFRICANS “Running Riot” in Melbourne

Melbourne, AUSTRALIA—The spike in street crime to more than one million incidents in the last year is largely due to the activities of “Apex” gang whose members are all from a “(BLACK African) Sudanese ‘refugee’ background,” police say.

The African crime wave has led local media to claim that “young thieves are running riot” in the suburbs, while the police chief said they “would rather steal than work.”

(Chief, you’re not telling us anything that we didn’t already know! Just refer to their origins and ask why most of Africa is still unable to advance beyond their primitive state of mind. Tens of thousands of needless Black Africans now embedded on Australian soil will keep the Police occupied forever. White South Africans would have been a better choice. For further education on Black dysfunctional trends, please listen to this radio podcast that MAY help to enlighten some people … click HERE.  ELN Editor)

apex-gang

The NON-white (Foreign African) gang is so named because their gang originated in Apex Street, Dandenong, about 20 miles southwest of Melbourne.

According to a report on Australia’s 7 News, police have blamed the Apex (Ape-x) gang for what they say is an “alarming spike” in violent crime in Melbourne, with (Australian state) Victoria’s crime rate soaring by 12.4 percent in the past year.

7 News said that the one million recorded offences have led to “claims young thieves are running riot on the suburbs.” Car thefts are up 22 percent across Victoria, while house burglaries have increased almost 14 percent. Weapons and explosives offences have soared 18.5 percent, theft has increased 16 percent, and drug use and possession is up 13.4 percent. Reported family violence offences have also jumped 10 percent since last year, the figures also revealed. Crime in the area where the Apex gang is most active in Dandenong is up an astonishing 24 percent.

(African Ape-x) gang members are mostly in their early twenties, but some as young as 13 have recently been arrested in connection with violent home invasions and carjackings.

Only last week, police arrested 13 African “refugees” after they pounced on a St. Albans family in Melbourne’s west(end) while they were in their BMW (car).

A 12-year-old victim was dragged out of her family’s car and told she would be killed, and the family home was robbed. The youngest NON-white (African) criminal was just 13 years old.  >con’t to FULL ARTICLE.

Related post:  Australia At The Cross-roads

Once referred as the “lucky country!” – White Australia during your grandparent’s time – 46 years ago!

Australia TODAY!

Australia Meets With BLACK Crime

African Assault on AUSTRALIA
Australia‘s DIMINISHING White Population

“Family” Comes First

By Vanishing American II

Hugging the chains

What’s with the people on rightist blogs who feel compelled to advocate for various immigrant/minority groups? It’s been going on for the years that I’ve been reading, or commenting, on such blogs.

Am I unreasonable to expect that most people who read or comment on such blogs should be unequivocally ethnopatriotic and loyal to their own people, actually putting their own folk’s interests first?

Making the rounds of a number of blogs this evening, I kept running across discussions where people were arguing for Hispanics, claiming that they are “more compatible” with our society than moslems. Well, space aliens, if they exist, would probably be more compatible with us than moslems, but does that mean we should welcome them if they ever land on our soil and start setting up housekeeping here? Is anybody, who is “preferable to moslems“, automatically a desirable addition to our country?

https://buelahman.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/white-genocide1.jpg?w=293&h=406

Where is the loyalty to our own folk, the natural preference for our own kin? I ask this because it’s absolutely essential to reclaiming what’s left of our divided country, and to re-establishing a relatively harmonious, well-functioning society. Yet, it seems that there is a significant faction of people, even on the right, who seem to accept that a mixed, multicultural, multi-ethnic, multiracial society is unavoidable … or even desirable.

Somalis swearingPhoto:  Refugee Settlement WATCH

In the past I’ve described this as the “favorite minority” syndrome. It seems there is this tendency for people to select a favorite ethnic group, and to plead on their behalf.

For many Americans this role is filled by Hispanics. Why?  I think it is because Hispanics have had a long-established presence in this country (U.S.) — especially in the border states. Many younger Texans, growing up in the multicult society, had Hispanic classmates/friends. Interracial dating and mating is hardly stigmatized as it once was in Texas.

Others, who grew up in mostly White areas are pro-Hispanic because they have had little real experience of them, and the kinds of people who tend towards thinking the best of everyone, simply blind themselves to negative evidence, and have a knee-jerk habit of taking up the defense of minority groups who are criticized by more realistic Whites.

These people could be aptly called (with some irony) White knights” who will clash with fellow Whites while defending Others.

Then we have the interracial relationship angle; more and more intermarriages are taking place, which is just what the powers-that-be and the media are openly promoting now. That, of course, alters allegiances and makes loyalties ambivalent.

Another group which benefits from the fact that they have White defenders are Filipinos. There is a set of White Americans, often people with military connections, who think Filipinos are a great asset to America — and as it happens, many men of this type tend to be married to Filipina women, and to have Filipino children and in-laws (who generally are brought here to live).

Asian immigrants tend to have more defenders amongst White Americans than even the Hispanics or Filipinos, because of the popular belief that they are all highly intelligent, law-abiding, and more compatible with us and our culture than any other ethnic/racial group.

Africans also have a great fan following among the Whites who have a favorite minority because — well, because racism. And because colonialism. We owe it to them because they have been so wronged, and by our ancestors and people who look like us. So let’s welcome them in and save them from ebola, FGM, Islam, and all the vagaries of life in Africa. The same principle applies to Haiti. They are victims of bad government, racism, and ‘unforgiving environment’, or whatever force of nature is causing their problems.

So between the compulsive altruists who think we have to fix every human ill and bring everybody to America to let them share our ‘free air’ and ‘magic dirt’, and those who simply have some kind of attraction for various ethnic groups, we have quite a number of people who, even as our country is being swamped by immigrants (legal and illegal) and ‘refugees’ — will insist on arguing for welcoming this group, or that group.

[Read:  Wake Up! America]

If, in a restored America, we made ”exceptions” for everybody’s favorite ethnic group, we would end up with de facto open borders, and the same old multicultural, polyglot Babel scenario that is being forced on us.

Are Americans really so inured to, or maybe addicted to ”diversity” that they unconsciously seek to argue for it, even as they claim to want to stop the politically correct insanity?

Many people say — especially since (Donald) Trump began his campaign — that they want us to build the fence, limit moslem immigration, and ‘take back America’ — yet they cling to ‘diversity’, or at least their own preferred minority group.

For me, this situation calls to mind a quote from G.K.Chesterton, who spoke of people ‘hugging the chains of their old slavery.’

Why hug the chains of ‘diversity’ dogma and political correctness — if we can choose to break our bonds?  >Source

(For added emphases, bolded, italicized, underline words and added links by ELN Editor)