Toronto Police “Losing Face” (Hijabs??)
Toronto Police “Losing Face” (Hijabs??)
Paying For Our Own Demise: Funding “Multicult” Canada
By Brad Salzberg
In 1988, multiculturalism in Canada officially became government policy. This was the year the policy became entrenched in our constitution, thereby completing a seventeen- year- long transition from political ideology to legislated government policy.
Within Canadian society, this is fairly common knowledge. What may be less well known is that on an international scale, constitutionally-based multiculturalism … is a rarity.
In fact, only two nations in the world have such a policy—Canada (35,000,000 people) and Australia (23,000,000). While many countries promote the concept of diversity, a mere (1%) of the world’s nations are officially multicultural.
At present, Canada has the highest per-capita immigration rates in the world. In conjunction with legislated multiculturalism, the impact upon our nation has been profound— so profound, it is arguable the long-term result will be a complete re-invention (transformation) of Canadian society.
For decades, Canadians have been informed by government that multiculturalism is “equitable”, and “beneficial” to all. Is this really the case? The answer– one which may surprise a great number of Canadians – is absolutely not.
In 1971 when Multiculturalism was in its infancy, about 95% of Canada’s population was of (White) European descent. (Today, we’re down to 77% and still plummeting in numbers – ELN Editor)
Decades of large-scale immigration, particularly from Asia and the Middle East, have rendered the traditional meaning of the term (“racial minority”) irrelevant. In 2014, twenty-six out of Canada’s 308 political ridings such as Richmond, B.C. and Brampton, Ontario were majority NON-white.
Canadians of European descent are now minorities within these twenty-six ridings — and yet hundreds of millions of (your tax) dollars are still being funnelled to multicultural organizations to promote their cultural agendas — despite the fact they are no longer minorities at all. (Read: No Punjabi, NO Job for Canadian Nurse)
On the flip side, the freshly-minted Caucasian minorities receive nothing. Even more disconcerting is the fact that when citizens point out the inequality of the present system, the pro-multicultural forces play what is known as the “race card.” >to Full Report
CANADIANS, please read this:
The relevant part of the meaning of the term for us is… “the mental stress or discomfort experienced by an individual who…is confronted by new information that conflicts with existing beliefs, ideas, or values.”
For the purposes of this blog, that would be the theories of race, multiculturalism, and diversity promoted by the mainstream media Vs reality … as seen in real life.
“Cognitive dissonance” theory is a key weapon in the promotion of multiculturalism. It was thought up by Jewish psychologist Leon Festinger. It has proved very useful in devising methods to overcome prejudice. Festinger also came up with “proximity theory” – simply that you become friends with whoever is near you. In many ways he is the ideological father of Section 8 housing in the United States.
Most people believe that stress caused by the increasing gap between what people see in the media and what they see in real life … will cause people to wake up. This is a myth.
Experiments in “cognitive dissonance” have shown that in order to escape from the stress, it induces most people to capitulate to multicultural brainwashing and just accept the status quo. Other experiments in “cognitive dissonance” have also shown that a high level of “racism-hatred” of other races – is also useless as a defense against multicultural brainwashing.
So the fact that distrust of the mainstream media (MSM) is at an all-time high is irrelevant. This just means that cognitive dissonance is also at an all time high – and this has always been shown to break peoples’ will to resist. The fact that people are becoming more vocally “racist” is also irrelevant. High levels of “hatred” of other races can be easily overcome.
Experiments have shown that the key thing in neutralizing “cognitive dissonance” and diversity-brainwashing is not distrust of the media or “racism” … but LOVE – love of your own race, the WHITE race.
One study said: “Racism is pro-white… rather than anti-black”. Cognitive Dissonance is ineffective against Love of the White race. That is why the enemy propaganda message was converted from ‘other races are good‘ to ‘the White race is useless‘ (or bad, or is “privileged”). How do we combat it? Here is the flaw in ‘cognitive dissonance’.
The elites don’t care if you’re “racist”. They don’t care if you go online and slander Jews, blacks and Arabs. The don’t care how negative you are towards other races. Because they know from their experiments that no matter how much you “hate” other races … you will be beaten. The elitists don’t fear your so-called “hatred” of other races. So what do they fear?
What they fear is love of your own race – the White race, so “racism” is pro-white and not anti-black. > Source
|University of British Columbia (UBC) campus|
Recently, I was at the University of British Columbia (UBC), one of Canada’s largest universities — which also happens to be one of Canada’s most prestigious — being regularly ranked in the top forty worldwide.
I was there to cheer on a friend of mine who was graduating. As with most graduations, there was a plethora of speeches given, and all were sentimental and lacking in substance.
Almost immediately Gordon began his speech by calling Canada “a nation of immigrants“, and he stated that he was also an immigrant. I could barely contain my displeasure.
Canada cannot “accurately be portrayed at Confederation as a nation of immigrants”. In 1867, 79 percent had been born in Canada. Over the 400 years before Confederation, there were only “two quite limited periods” of substantial arrivals of immigrants: from 1783 to 1812, and from 1830 to 1850. In these two periods, the immigrants were “overwhelmingly of British origin”.
In the case of Quebec the amount of immigration from the motherland was far fewer as in the aftermath of the Seven Years War, New France fell to the British, and ties with France were all but broken.
The French-speaking population numbered about 70,000 in the 1760s, and thereafter, until the late 1800s, the population expanded rapidly with women having 5.6 surviving children on average. By 1950, the Quebec population was almost 4 million. This increase was not a result of immigration, but of continuing high fertility rates.
I am — and surely many of those associated with the CEC, readers, contributors, etc. — the descendant of British colonists who arrived before there was a United States, let alone Canada! Would Gordon really have the gall to call me an immigrant!?
My ancestors literally built the two great nations in North America — they settled the land, farmed it, built highways and all manner of buildings upon it; yet, if we are to believe Gordon, they are no different than someone who has only just arrived to enjoy the fruits of my ancestor’s labour?
And the later intake of settlers that occurred in the aftermath of Confederation were almost exclusively European in makeup, with Germans being perhaps the largest group. The only major difference between Germans and the founding peoples of Canada is linguistic. The German settlers were all either Protestant or Catholic, and as Europeans, obviously come from the same racial stock as French and Anglos. The same could also be said of the Icelandic, Italian, Dutch and other Western European arrivals. A greater difference exists between the founding peoples and Ukrainians, Greeks and Russians — who also began arriving in large numbers towards the end of the 20th century — as these people are Orthodox, but again … they were all White Christians.
Hardly a clash of worlds. Gordon peppered his speech with the terms “diversity” and “inclusiveness”. I cannot remember just how many times he used these terms, but it was almost excessive. These are terms which, like a wolf in sheep’s clothing, appear harmless on the surface but on further inspection are revealed to be deadly. As we all know these terms have been used time and time again by those who are anti-western. They hate Whites, thinking that we are somehow evil and that Western culture is worse than others. This is absurd when one considers that human rights, liberties, democracy and all the other values they claim to stand up for, are Western inventions. If we go, then they go too.
Indeed, thanks to mass immigration, we here in Canada have seen an increase in truly barbaric practices — sorry Trudeau, but ‘yes’, barbaric is an appropriate term for them — like FGM and so-called honour killings, which thankfully were unknown in the days before Pearson. How can liberty and human rights exist among people who routinely mutilate, and even butcher their own women?
After Gordon, the university president Arvind Gupta gave a speech. His was thankful without the obvious lies that Gordon had just peddled, but he still made a point of discussing the importance of foreign students and on opening up UBC to the international community. Now there is nothing wrong with students coming to Canada for education, but the problem is that Gupta, like his predecessors, is putting a greater emphasis on international students. No doubt he shared Gordon’s views about Canada as a “land of immigrants”! There is money to be made in pandering to the largely non-white population of UBC. …>>read more.
In late May, the local Council of Rotherham in Northern England, has asked the Government for special powers to have protest marches by “extremist groups” in the city outlawed.
Rotherham has been one of the places in England hit by Muslim paedophile gangs.
For 20 years, Muslim rings have been grooming White girls for sexual exploitation, totally undisturbed by police, social services, politicians and media. After the continuous cover-up became impossible, at one point there were at least 54 active investigations on as many grooming gangs in Britain. Assuming that each gang may have had dozens or hundreds of victims over the years, possibly thousands of White girls have been abused, raped and even murdered in all this time.
Just because they were White – as the abuse had a racial and religious motivation – and because the authorities didn’t dare lift a finger against a minority protected by political correctness.
The ongoing scandal has generated outrage among that part of the population that, due to its geographical or social proximity to these crimes and the multicultural environment from which they originate, feels particularly affected by them.
Several street demonstrations have been organised by the English Defence League (EDL), Britain First and other organisations. Now Rotherham Council wants to ban the protests.
These had intensified after the publication of the so-called “Jay Report” last August, which revealed that “South Yorkshire Police and Rotherham Council had failed at least 1,400 victims of child sexual exploitation over a 16-year-period, with many of the main offenders being men of Pakistani origin“.
A group of EDL demonstrators set up camp outside Rotherham police station from 29 August to 13 September, calling for the resignation of police and crime commissioner Shaun Wright, who had been responsible for children’s services at Rotherham Council between 2005 and 2010.
The reason adduced by Rotherham Council for banning the legitimate protests is ostensibly economic: the great cost involved in policing both them and the Left’s counter-demonstrations, and the “blighted” image of the city, with consequent loss of town centre shopping and business.
At the end of the local newspaper article reporting on this, someone left this comment:
Other comments echo similar feelings.
Only last week Bradford Police have charged “14 men and a 16-year-old male from Keighley with sex offences relating to rape and sexual abuse of a child under 16“, alleged to have occurred in 2011-2012. The accused all have surnames like Hussain, Ali, Mahmood, Ziarab, Iqbal, Khan.
The local press has been alone in reporting this news, with the national media ignoring it.
Can banning protests deriving from a justified feeling of offence be the way forward?
And why is the cover-up, at least on the part of the media, apparently still going on?
40 years ago!
In a post that was more reminiscent of a far-right extremist, than a former Vice President of the European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party (ALDE), Ojuland said that the “white race is threatened” by dark-skinned immigrants (Ojuland actually used an Estonian word “neeger” which is not officially considered offensive in Estonia, but nevertheless becoming socially unacceptable).
“Today, yet again, I see a fully able young Negro begging for money in Italy, from people who have worked hard to earn a lunch. I think that we should start a pan-European campaign to collect signatures to ensure that not a single so-called refugee gets across the Mediterranean. Enough of this nonsense!” Ojuland, the former high-ranking politician who for years campaigned Estonia to join the EU, wrote.
Her posting has so far gathered over 2,000 “likes”, 500 shares and 300 comments. While many people pointed out her offensive remarks and some called her “racist”, one would have thought that the former foreign minister would back down, but it didn’t turn out to be so. Instead, Ojuland chose to rigorously defend her statement, and even went offensive against the moderate commentators who asked for common sense.
“Stop using a word ‘racist’! As a White person, I feel that the White race is threatened today! Are Estonians also so brain-washed now that they start talking some kind of politically correct bullshit?” Ojuland said. … read more.
“If You’re BLACK, GO BACK”
(Kui oled Black, mine tagasi!)
…and a sampling of one African country.
AUSTRIA (Population – 8,440,000)
SWITZERLAND (Population – 8,055,000)
NORWAY (Population – 5,075,000)
ESTONIA (Population – 1,300,000)
EUROPEAN UNION (EU)
AUSTRALIA (Population – 23,630,000)
Class photo – Elementary School in SWEDEN today!
Some 3rd-World, NON-white Nations’ Population for comparison:
China – (Population 1,374,000,000) BILLION
India – (Population 1,295,000,000) BILLION
Pakistan – (Population 189,000,000) Million
Bangladesh – Population 163,000,000) Million
Philippines – Population 103,000,000) Million
Nigeria – (Population 180,000,000) Million
“Feel good” competitive altruism??
“If You’re BLACK, GO BACK!” (EESTI VABARIIK)
… with Ramzpaul on Multicultural Chaos, Peaceful Nationalism & White Guilt
|“We are the Ideal Family in Canada” (??)|
According to University of Toronto sociologist Shyon Baumann, there are too many White faces in Canadian ads, and he does not like it:
The media does have the power to shape our ideas about who people are. The media can reinforce cultural values that are already out there, so when we see commercials that feature characters that we are not used to seeing — a black family eating at a restaurant rather than a white family — little by little if we are exposed to those ideas over time, it broadens the idea of what is normal.
Sears Optical needs to be punished. They need to be taught a lesson. They need to keep up with the times. Don’t they know that we are living in the new Canada? Don’t they know that ours is an “inclusive” multi-racial and multi-cultural society where every colour of the rainbow must be represented everywhere, and at all times? Don’t they know that most of their customers reside in Canada’s five major centres, all of which boast of their “diversity“, and that the biggest, Toronto is — as a CTV commercial put it — proud to be a “conduit” to the world?
What are people of colour who watch this Sears Optical commercial to think? What are their children to think? What are they to think if they don’t see themselves or people who look like themselves in each and every damn TV ad? They might feel that they don’t belong to this country. They might feel “excluded”. Unwanted. What a terrible thing to do to children! You can only imagine what this will do to their self-esteem. [For less astute readers, the above was written as sarcasm. ELN Editor]
Seriously, this Sears Optical commercial was conspicuous because it was exceptional. Typically, almost all TV ads in Canada today use inter-racial settings to provide a trendy backdrop to sell products from cars to soap to coffee. You name it. In so doing, they offer viewers a lens to see the Canada they want us to see, a carefully manufactured multi-ethnic utopia where ethnic communities are meshing seamlessly. It’s a narrative of colour-blindness and cross-cultural congruity that is meant to flatter us. “See, Canada’s great experiment in multiculturalism is an outstanding success. Our model is working. Canada is the exception to the rule. We alone have discovered the secret formula of mixing oil and water. And these ads prove it. They’re a barometer of our progress.”
Thus “diversity advertising” is able to kill two birds with one stone by serving twin objectives. The first, obviously, is to broaden the company’s customer base. The second is to demonstrate corporate responsibility by “getting with the program” and falling into line with the national all-party agenda. “We aren’t just serving you, our customers, we are serving the country and its great cause. Look, even our employees are diverse. We walk the talk.”
Some Canadians — “rednecks”, “racists”, and “bigots” — you know the type — might be seething with rage about all of this. They might think as I do. They don’t think that the appearance of non-white faces on television is objectionable because somehow skin colour is correlated with good or bad character. Nor do they believe that the people of colour who are depicted on the screen are less ‘Canadian‘ than they are, or that they don’t deserve to be treated well or accorded the full rights of citizenship. No, that’s not it. That is not what makes them angry.
They’re angry because they believe that this ‘diversity-in-your-face‘ strategy is deliberately designed to convey a clear message to Canadians of European origin: Traditional Canada, the Canada of two founding nations, the bicultural Canada, is history. It’s dead. And it’s never coming back. So get over it. Move on. And most of all … shut up!
Unfortunately, I won’t.
Don’t get me wrong. I don’t have a problem with how people look, or that their genes are different from mine. As a matter of fact, two people in my family are non-white, and three are ‘half-caste’. No, that is not my problem.
My problem is what the proliferation of brown faces in new(s) casts, parliament, talk shows and TV dramas reflect. It reflects the success of an agenda that was never put to a vote, and for which no federal government ever had a mandate to pursue. The agenda of mass immigration and Official Multiculturalism. The agenda of cutting Canada from its European moorings by casting the immigration net across the world, of transforming what was once a largely bi-cultural country into a multicultural dog’s breakfast … of recruiting cheap labour from failed states … of packing our cities with more and more people who must squeeze tighter and tighter, while subdividing farmland to alleviate the pressure. The result? Higher density and sprawl at the same time. The worst of both worlds.
“Stupid” White man needs affirmation from a Black woman. If the roles were reversed in this TV commercial, there would be vociferous voices calling out for a boycott against Scotia Bank.
Now, for the some reality:
(A cure for “White Guilt”: “It’s a WONDERFUL RACE” )
These [racially] “inclusive” TV commercials are a persistent reminder that we are losing our country, that we are the guinea pigs of a social engineering project that we never agreed to. Hapless victims of a game plan hatched many decades ago, before half of us were even born. Casualties of a disease that went largely undetected until its symptoms finally became obvious to all. Slowly, step by step, these commercials are conditioning us to accept that what we now see is normal, making what is to come less worrisome. In essence, they are setting us up for a future where Euro-Canadians will be marginalized in every major city of the country. Breaking us in and breaking us down.
The process has been insidious. No wonder so many of us were taken by surprise. No wonder that legislative changes and ideas that seemed harmless, or trivial, or even laudable at the time, once planted, took root and suddenly exploded across the landscape to envelop all of our institutions, like morning glory in the late spring. Even now, there are people in our own ethnic ranks who are mesmerized by its beautiful blossoms, unable to grasp that it is an invasive species that won’t quit until it has displaced all before it. It may be too late to stop its progress, or uproot the policies that fertilize it.
If that is the case, I don’t need TV commercials to rub more salt into my wounds. Thank you, Sears Optical, for your careless oversight. It was nice of you to give us a look into the rear-view mirror and see the Canada which we once knew and lost. The one that they want us to repudiate and forget. >Source: http://www.eurocanadian.ca (For added emphasis, Bolded, Italicized, underlined words and links by ELN editor)
TORONTO, Ontario – 1977