Was Justice Served Here?

By Jeff Goodall

Security guard shoots and kills two in scuffle – no charges?

In March of this year (2015), a uniformed, armed security guard got into an altercation going into a McDonald’s in the east end of Toronto for something to eat, and shot and killed two men.

Now we are told that no charges will be laid, as there is no prospect of a conviction as the guard was acting in “self-defence”.

And as no charges will be laid, it naturally follows that the identity of the guard cannot be made known to the public

There are several problems with this, in that the right to self-defence in Canada is anything but an absolute. Here is an extract from a 2012 CBC News item on the issue, and there is a link to the relevant section of the Criminal Code below:

CBC News: Under what circumstances in Canada is the use of lethal force allowed? – Again, Nichols says the decision is in the judge’s hands, and is made on a case-by-case basis. – “It all comes back to what is reasonable in the circumstance,” she says. “A judge would have to find you had no other choice.” (2). (My emphasis).

 Ryan Hind (restaurant patron) shot to death.

  Donny Ouimette (restaurant patron) shot dead.

With two unarmed men shot dead, one would think that there is a compelling public interest here for the case to go forward, either with or without a jury as the defence may wish; if the guard’s actions were not reasonable then the public interest demands that he or she should be punished, and if the shootings were indeed justified, then presumably he or she would be happy to be legally vindicated.

There is no shortage of examples of persons being charged by the Crown for using firearms to defend themselves, regardless of whether death or injury resulted, usually in rural areas where police response-times can be anything but prompt.

Indeed, public objections to people being prosecuted for acting in a seemingly reasonable manner to protect themselves, their families and their property, has sometimes resulted in public outrage against the police and the Crown.

[…]

We are additionally told that “Selwyn is also an Attorney-at-Law in the Republic of Guyana and Republic of Trinidad and Tobago.”

It seems unlikely to me that Pieters would go to such efforts to speak out on behalf of a White person under these circumstances, so I think it highly likely that the security guard involved is Black … and quite possibly an immigrant.

And if so, then the identity of the guard is probably being withheld from the public for fear of an adverse reaction … both to the killings and to Canada’s open-door immigration policies.

Of course, things would be a lot different if a White security guard shot and killed two unarmed Blacks; the screaming and yelling and threats of “No justice, no peace!” together with demands for charges to be laid would never stop

But despite the best efforts of the police, courts and the press, this deliberate racial double-standard can only go on for so long, and sooner or later, it will have to come to an end. >>to Full Report

[For added emphasis, bolded, underlined words by ELN Editor]

Also read:

Tribal Politics – Choosing Toronto’s Police Chief

Toronto Police Losing “Face” 

White Males Need Not Apply

***********************************

Importing Black Violence

Importing Jamaican “Culture”

Canada’s BLACK Population

Is Racial Diversity Good For Canada?

What is “Cognitive Dissonance”?

The relevant part of the meaning of the term for us is… “the mental stress or discomfort experienced by an individual who…is confronted by new information that conflicts with existing beliefs, ideas, or values.”

For the purposes of this blog, that would be the theories of race, multiculturalism, and diversity promoted by the mainstream media Vs reality … as seen in real life.

Cognitive dissonance” theory is a key weapon in the promotion of multiculturalism. It was thought up by Jewish psychologist Leon Festinger. It has proved very useful in devising methods to overcome prejudice. Festinger also came up with “proximity theory” – simply that you become friends with whoever is near you. In many ways he is the ideological father of Section 8 housing in the United States.

Most people believe that stress caused by the increasing gap between what people see in the media and what they see in real life … will cause people to wake up. This is a myth.

Experiments in “cognitive dissonance” have shown that in order to escape from the stress, it induces most people to capitulate to multicultural brainwashing and just accept the status quo. Other experiments in “cognitive dissonance” have also shown that a high level of “racism-hatred” of other races – is also useless as a defense against multicultural brainwashing.

So the fact that distrust of the mainstream media (MSM) is at an all-time high is irrelevant. This just means that cognitive dissonance is also at an all time high – and this has always been shown to break peoples’ will to resist. The fact that people are becoming more vocally “racist” is also irrelevant. High levels of “hatred” of other races can be easily overcome.

Experiments have shown that the key thing in neutralizing “cognitive dissonance” and diversity-brainwashing is not distrust of the media or “racism” … but LOVE – love of your own race, the WHITE race.

European children

One study said: “Racism is pro-white… rather than anti-black”. Cognitive Dissonance is ineffective against Love of the White race. That is why the enemy propaganda message was converted from ‘other races are good‘ to ‘the White race is useless‘ (or bad, or is “privileged”). How do we combat it? Here is the flaw in ‘cognitive dissonance’.

The elites don’t care if you’re “racist”. They don’t care if you go online and slander Jews, blacks and Arabs. The don’t care how negative you are towards other races. Because they know from their experiments that no matter how much you “hate” other races … you will be beaten. The elitists don’t fear your so-called “hatred” of other races. So what do they fear?

What they fear is love of your own race – the White race, so “racism” is pro-white and not anti-black.  > Source

VATERLAND

Also read:

“Useful Idiots”

State Destruction of the Family Unit

Multiculturalism – A Dividing Force

Is Racial Diversity Good For Canada?

**************************************

To See The Farm, Is To Leave It

*********************************

JAPAN Simply Rejects Mass Immigration

JAPAN Prefers Racial Homogeneity

Leftist Mainstream Media Bias

Unknown Author

Canadian Media BIAS?

If you read any number of reactionary/hard-conservative blogs and websites, it is readily apparent that I’m not saying anything new. It’s all run-of-the-mill stuff that you might read on Vdare.

What makes this blog unique and valuable, in my opinion, is that these opinions are being applied to the Canadian situation. Canadians do Internet searches on Canadian issues that lead them to my site (unfortunately, original source is no longer available – Editor). I’d like to think that I’m making other true conservatives feel like they’re not alone, as well as maybe converting a person or two who happen to stumble upon my site.

Conservative Canadians are a moderately sized minority in this country, but one would NOT know that from reading newspapers or watching TV.  Unlike the United States, we have zero (conservative) representation in the public sphere.

“News” is reported with a blatant left-wing bias. The majority of my articles on this blog deal with taking Globe & Mail (newspaper) articles and rewriting them from a conservative standpoint; exposing their biases and logical errors. Today is going to be no different. I recently came across two articles which both deal with the same issue: Minorities in Canada being paid less, relative to their White counterparts, and how White “racism” is to blame. They are both long articles, so read them first, and then come back here, where I will be cherry-picking sentences that rubbed me the wrong way, and rebutting them. Black Canadians Paid Less on Average Relative to Whites: Study Canadian-Born Visible Minorities Earn Less The first article complains that:

[The StatsCan Study] found that second-generation Blacks face a wage gap of about 10% to 15% compared with non-visible minorities (who are they?? – editor). The gap persists even though the results were controlled for education and residencial [sic] location. Statscan didn’t explain why it think there’s a persistent wage gap — but it didn’t rule out discrimation[sic]. “Wage discrimination may or may not be a contributing factor,” the agency said.

I would say “may not”, and would point to hereditary IQ differences between population groups as the main culprit.

Little economic research has delved into why the gap exists. But Statscan does cite a 2008 study, by University of Toronto professor Philip Oreopoulos, which found job applicants with English-sounding names are much more likely to get a job interview than applicants with non-English-sounding names.

This study was biased, as they undoubtedly only attempted to entrap White-run companies. Did they try a study where they sent English-sounding names to East-Indian or Chinese-run companies (two ethnic groups who are very nepotistic)?  I’m sure their results would have shown definite ANTI-White bias in that case … more so than the anti-minority bias noticed above.

Newspapers are always pointing to anti-minority employer bias … but there are very real instances of ANTI-White bias that are never mentioned. Anyone who has ever traveled through Vancouver International Airport, or Toronto’s Pearson Airport, can attest to the fact that the staff is at least 80% NON-white (Canada is about 84% WHITE majority).  Journalists fly all the time.  Maybe they are all as good at “not seeing colour” as they claim. More likely, the pro-minority/anti-white bias in hiring doesn’t fit in with their worldview… so they don’t write about it, unless to celebrate it. Like in a paragraph from the second article.

She (a minority who suspected that she was being passed over for promotions in a previous job) has since found her niche, earning a salary close to six figures with an employer whose work force is 50% visible-minority (NON-white). “I’m treated very fairly here,” she said.

Where is the outrage that she now works in an office in which a certain segment of the population (Whites-84%) is under-represented in comparison to its proportion of the general population?  Oh yeah, they’re White, so it doesn’t matter. More minorities = better.

[The study] also looked at gender, and found second-generation males who are visible-minorities tend to earn less than their White counterparts “in spite of the fact that they are more likely to live in large centres and that they have higher levels of educational attainment.”

This was the dumbest sentence in either article. The biggest salaries in the big cities are definitely higher than those earned out in the country.  But the average salary in the country is much higher than the average salary in the city, because men in the country do real, productive work; like work in the oil & gas or mining industries, as well as agriculture and logging. Those jobs pay high wages. People in the city (especially racial minorities) are likely to be working in the low-paying service industry. Again, the Globe and Mail chooses to view facts subjectively through an ANTI-White lens, instead of objectively.

There are many reasons for a wage gap that don’t involve “racism“:  For example, genetically determined traits such as IQ and temperament and their choice of job. You will notice that the article didn’t state that Black doctors are getting paid less than White doctors. If more Whites become doctors, and more Blacks become janitors, the racial wage average is going to be skewed in favour of White people. Adjusting for education doesn’t mean anything. It all comes down to job choice.

Is there active discrimination in hiring by White-run companies?  Probably. They may prefer to hire people who fit in, rather than visible-minorities with an axe to grind. Racial-minority companies are much worse at racially discriminating practices… but the media becomes very silent on that issue. >Source no longer available

ALSO READ:  Useful Idiots

Is Burlington TOO White?

Canada’s Black Population

****************************

Happiest City in Canada

Guelph Importing Multi-racialism

Canadian City Abhors “White Privilege”  *****************************************

Canadians Betrayed By Politicians

Mass Immigration’s NEGATIVE Affects ***************************************** Multiculturalism Is A Fraud

Racial Diversity – A CON Game

Canada Is Too Accommodating

Canadian Generosity Vs Stupidity

TV Commercials Sell Racial Diversity

The Canada They Want Us to See — And the Canada They Want Us to Forget

by Tim Murray

Miscegenation in Canada
“We are the Ideal Family in Canada”  (??)

According to University of Toronto sociologist Shyon Baumann, there are too many White faces in Canadian ads, and he does not like it:

The media does have the power to shape our ideas about who people are. The media can reinforce cultural values that are already out there, so when we see commercials that feature characters that we are not used to seeing — a black family eating at a restaurant rather than a white family — little by little if we are exposed to those ideas over time, it broadens the idea of what is normal.

It was like sighting a Sasquatch or a flying saucer. I couldn’t believe my eyes. I was watching TV today when a commercial advertising “Sears Optical” eyeglasses appeared — get this — without any “people-of-colour”!
Quick, somebody phone 911! Somebody contact the Hate Crimes department of the local police! Somebody file a complaint with the Human Rights Commission! Hurry!

Sears Optical needs to be punished. They need to be taught a lesson. They need to keep up with the times. Don’t they know that we are living in the new Canada? Don’t they know that ours is an “inclusive” multi-racial and multi-cultural society where every colour of the rainbow must be represented everywhere, and at all times? Don’t they know that most of their customers reside in Canada’s five major centres, all of which boast of their “diversity“, and that the biggest, Toronto is — as a CTV commercial put it — proud to be a “conduit” to the world?

What are people of colour who watch this Sears Optical commercial to think? What are their children to think? What are they to think if they don’t see themselves or people who look like themselves in each and every damn TV ad? They might feel that they don’t belong to this country. They might feel “excluded”. Unwanted. What a terrible thing to do to children! You can only imagine what this will do to their self-esteem. [For less astute readers, the above was written as sarcasm. ELN Editor]

Seriously, this Sears Optical commercial was conspicuous because it was exceptional. Typically, almost all TV ads in Canada today use inter-racial settings to provide a trendy backdrop to sell products from cars to soap to coffee. You name it. In so doing, they offer viewers a lens to see the Canada they want us to see, a carefully manufactured multi-ethnic utopia where ethnic communities are meshing seamlessly. It’s a narrative of colour-blindness and cross-cultural congruity that is meant to flatter us. “See, Canada’s great experiment in multiculturalism is an outstanding success. Our model is working. Canada is the exception to the rule. We alone have discovered the secret formula of mixing oil and water. And these ads prove it. They’re a barometer of our progress.”

Thus “diversity advertising” is able to kill two birds with one stone by serving twin objectives. The first, obviously, is to broaden the company’s customer base. The second is to demonstrate corporate responsibility by “getting with the program” and falling into line with the national all-party agenda. “We aren’t just serving you, our customers, we are serving the country and its great cause. Look, even our employees are diverse. We walk the talk.”

Some Canadians — “rednecks”, “racists”, and “bigots” — you know the type — might be seething with rage about all of this. They might think as I do. They don’t think that the appearance of non-white faces on television is objectionable because somehow skin colour is correlated with good or bad character. Nor do they believe that the people of colour who are depicted on the screen are less ‘Canadian‘ than they are, or that they don’t deserve to be treated well or accorded the full rights of citizenship. No, that’s not it. That is not what makes them angry.

They’re angry because they believe that this ‘diversity-in-your-face‘ strategy is deliberately designed to convey a clear message to Canadians of European origin: Traditional Canada, the Canada of two founding nations, the bicultural Canada, is history. It’s dead. And it’s never coming back. So get over it. Move on. And most of all … shut up!

Unfortunately, I won’t.

Don’t get me wrong. I don’t have a problem with how people look, or that their genes are different from mine. As a matter of fact, two people in my family are non-white, and three are ‘half-caste’. No, that is not my problem.

My problem is what the proliferation of brown faces in new(s) casts, parliament, talk shows and TV dramas reflect. It reflects the success of an agenda that was never put to a vote, and for which no federal government ever had a mandate to pursue. The agenda of mass immigration and Official Multiculturalism. The agenda of cutting Canada from its European moorings by casting the immigration net across the world, of transforming what was once a largely bi-cultural country into a multicultural dog’s breakfast … of recruiting cheap labour from failed states … of packing our cities with more and more people who must squeeze tighter and tighter, while subdividing farmland to alleviate the pressure. The result? Higher density and sprawl at the same time. The worst of both worlds.

“Stupid” White man needs affirmation from a Black woman. If the roles were reversed in this TV commercial, there would be vociferous voices calling out for a boycott against Scotia Bank.

************************************
Now, for the some reality:

(A cure for “White Guilt”:  “It’s a WONDERFUL RACE” )

These [racially] “inclusive” TV commercials are a persistent reminder that we are losing our country, that we are the guinea pigs of a social engineering project that we never agreed to. Hapless victims of a game plan hatched many decades ago, before half of us were even born. Casualties of a disease that went largely undetected until its symptoms finally became obvious to all. Slowly, step by step, these commercials are conditioning us to accept that what we now see is normal, making what is to come less worrisome. In essence, they are setting us up for a future where Euro-Canadians will be marginalized in every major city of the country. Breaking us in and breaking us down.

The process has been insidious. No wonder so many of us were taken by surprise. No wonder that legislative changes and ideas that seemed harmless, or trivial, or even laudable at the time, once planted, took root and suddenly exploded across the landscape to envelop all of our institutions, like morning glory in the late spring. Even now, there are people in our own ethnic ranks who are mesmerized by its beautiful blossoms, unable to grasp that it is an invasive species that won’t quit until it has displaced all before it. It may be too late to stop its progress, or uproot the policies that fertilize it.

If that is the case, I don’t need TV commercials to rub more salt into my wounds. Thank you, Sears Optical, for your careless oversight. It was nice of you to give us a look into the rear-view mirror and see the Canada which we once knew and lost. The one that they want us to repudiate and forget. >Source: http://www.eurocanadian.ca  (For added emphasis, Bolded, Italicized, underlined words and links by ELN editor)

TORONTO, Ontario – 1977

********************************************************************************************
Related posts:
ANTI-white Media
“Stupid” WHITE Man Commercials
TV Commercials Insult WHITE People
*******************************************
More Commercial Media Brainwashing
Turn Your Television OFF
Also read:
Importing BLACK Crime
Canada’s BLACK Population
Is Racial Diversity Good For Canada?
******************************************
Re-colonizing Canada
Canada’s Happiest City

March Against WHITE Genocide

 H/T This Is Europa

Imported “multi-culturalism” (their invented word) is a corrupting agenda designed to destabilize majority-White nations, and to displace homogeneous White peoples with incongruent NON-whites by way of massive 3rd-world immigration.

JEWISH studies professor, Noel Ignatiev is the first person seen in the above video, and is quoted as saying elsewhere:

“The goal of abolishing the white race, is, on its face so desirable, that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white ‘supremacists’. Make no mistake about it, we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the ‘social construct’ known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed–not ‘deconstructed’ … but destroyed.” (my underlined, bold words – Ed)

Need more proof?

… and, what does ISRAEL do?

In a small eastern city, Canadian taxpayers are “honoured in welcoming“, yet more illiterate and incompatible FOREIGNERS that cost upwards of $50,000(?) each! (Airfare, hotels, food, medical/dental services, ground transportation, hired enablers, ESL classes, clothing allowances. Then comes their FREE lifetime welfare cheques, and modern subsidized apartments, plus other free benefits, plus lots of FREE time to wander around our parks, civic gardens and modern shopping malls like pampered tourists.

In contrast, many destitute Canadian-born citizens having those often described “white privileges“, will sleep under bridges or on city grates, while yet another plane-load of unknown foreign “refugees” land on Canadian soil tonight.)
special photo toned f/x and grid, made form my images
City of Saint John’s newest “Refugees” (<click)

(The real costs of importing FOREIGN “refugees” from half-way around the world and ceremoniously planting them in our country … is never revealed by the mainstream media (MSM), nor by “your” government because they do NOT want you knowing about that minor detail.) 

Related:  Saint John – Happiest City In Canada (Posted in 2007)

Also read:

More Refugees to Support

Windsor’s Border Is Wide Open

700,000 “Refugees” Since 1987  (CANADA)

6 (Yes, just Six) “Refugees” in 2013 (JAPAN)

Censoring The People’s Internet

By Fred

[…]

Today, the Internet is the only free press we have, all that stands against total control of information.

Consider how relentlessly the media impose political correctness, how the slightest offense to the protected groups—we all know who they are—or to sacred policies leads to firing of reporters and groveling by politicians.  The wars are buried and serious criticism of Washington suppressed. That leaves the net, only the net, without which we would know nothing.

Which is why it must be, and will be censored … sooner, if Washington can get away with it, and later, if not. The tactics are predictable.

First, “hate speech” will be banned. The government will tell us whom we can hate, and whom we cannot. “Hatred” will be vaguely defined so that one will never be sure when one is engaging in it and, since it will be prosecutable, one will have to be very careful. Disapproval of favored groups, or of their behavior, will be defined as hatred. National security will be invoked, silencing whistle-blowers or, eventually, anything that might make the public uneasy with Washington’s wars.

The next step probably will be to block links to foreign sites deemed to transgress. China is good at this. The most likely avenue will be executive orders of increasingly Draconian nature, about which Congress and the Dead—the Supreme Court, I meant to say—will do nothing.

At that point, coming soon  to a theater near you, the United States as it was intended to be, and to an extent was, will be over. Our increasingly characterless young, raised to ignorance and “Appropriate Thought” by government schools, will question nothing. They will have no way of knowing that there is anything to question.

I suppose it can be debated whether the current enstupidation of the rising generations is deliberate or merely the consequence of a return to peasantry inescapable in a democracy. The petulance and immaturity running through so much of society may be inevitable in a spoiled people who have never had to do anything and have never been told “no.” Certainly, things today resemble the end games of other once-dominant cultures.

Mental darkness facilitates authoritarianism, and darkness we have.  Many college graduates can barely read. Their ignorance of history, politics, and geography (and practically everything else) is profound, and they see no reason why they should know anything. They seem not to suspect that there might be things worth knowing.

I am hard pressed to think of a society in such internal decline that has turned itself around, and I cannot imagine how ours might do so. One sure thing is that, once the Internet is gelded … there will be no hope at all. And the assault has begun.  …to Full Report

[For added emphasis, bolded, underlined, italicized words and links are by ELN Editor]

Also read:

“News” Vs Propaganda

Turn Your Television OFF

Mass Media: Smoke & Mirrors

INTERNET: Last Bastion of the Free Press

**********************************************

Start Your Own News Blog

Mass Mind Control Through MSM

What is Freedom to YOU?

By Pat

[Many] people today … know “something” is wrong with this society.

They see the “changes” that are really overt signs of decay. Most people are unhappy. Most people are fat. Most people don’t have fulfilling relationships. Most people are under financial pressure. Most people recognize that society at large is becoming more of a reflection of the 3rd world.

But they don’t know why.

Most people seem to find the concepts of freedom, knowledge, and the meaning of life to be perplexing in definition.

What is freedom to you? If you don’t have the option of doing the opposite – then you’re not free. How much freedom do you really have?

What is knowledge? If you can’t objectively and empirically justify your “belief” about something – then you merely hold a tentative idea … and it’s not knowledge.

What is the meaning of life to you? Is it control of your environment, and the subjugation of others by any means necessary, or is it the pursuit of truth – no matter where that leads?

What we are seeing is the advance of a certain group who hold that the meaning of life is to control the environment, and the subjugation of everyone else, by any means necessary. They are using certain tools to leverage this. The most pervasive is usury. Usury and the private issuance of monetary instruments at practically no cost to the issuer ensures that the private entity will own everything that the issued-money can buy. Adolf Hitler circumvented that by having Germany engage in straight barter with other countries – using no monetary instruments at all for international trade. They just “traded” finished goods for raw materials. That practice completely f*cked the jews.

[Read: Economic Plan of Germany’s NSDAP]

Another major tool “they” use against us … is the application of various forms or brainwashing. The science of mind manipulation is very advanced now. Watching them do this is is really quite interesting. In the past they primarily used Pavlovian methods of behavior and thought control … today electronic media uses a combination of hypnosis, NLP and a few other key techniques to induce reflexive responses in the target audiences.

Anyone with a lot of experience in martial arts will understand the concept of “setting up” the opponent by inducing a reflexive response – that is then taken advantage of in the form of another maneuver. The uninitiated won’t even understand what he’s seeing as the master engages an opponent to induce a reflex. Once that reflex happens, the master fluidly executes his real plan.

That is the real “Art” in fighting.

The Globalist Communists have been hard at work developing what I refer to as “Mental Martial Arts”. They apply these methods primarily through the TV, but they are also used in universities.

Without question, the TV is the most influential medium of mass communication ever. It has joined the toilet as a nearly ubiquitous feature of the modern human dwelling.

The “averageAmerican watches 5 hours and 11 minutes of television every single day. That’s 36 hours of TV every week. That translates into 1,872 hours. Let’s say … they averaged 8 hours of sleep each day and were awake for 16. That means they spend the equivalent of 117 entire waking days watching TV. If watching TV was limited to only 8 hours a day they’d be sitting there watching for 234 days straight. Obviously, TV watching is a massive issue.

Much of that “programming” has been devoted, either directly or indirectly at maligning the German National Socialists. To say that they “failed” and their ideas invalid does not reflect the facts.

They did not “fail”. They were bombed. They were subjected to mass murder. They were occupied and will continue to be occupied until at least 2099.

I submit that they succeeded and posed such an utter threat to the Globalist Communists, that even today NS ideas are feared by the Globalist Communists.

As for the Internet, it’s just a tool – but it is HEAVILY infiltrated. However, it can be used to a limited degree. The real action is in the real world with real people … and that is where much focus should be placed.

The conflict playing out before us is really very basic. I would prefer to see those whose view the meaning of life to be the pursuit of TRUTH – regardless of where that may lead — win. Source