ELLIOT LAKE News

Political INcorrect Constructs Arranged To Awaken Slumbering Minds…

Archive for the category “Media Relations”

March Against WHITE Genocide

 H/T This Is Europa

Imported “multi-culturalism” (their invented word) is a corrupting agenda designed to destabilize majority-White nations, and to displace homogeneous White peoples with incongruent NON-whites by way of massive 3rd-world immigration.

JEWISH studies professor, Noel Ignatiev is the first person seen in the above video, and is quoted as saying elsewhere:

“The goal of abolishing the white race, is, on its face so desirable, that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white ‘supremacists’. Make no mistake about it, we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the ‘social construct’ known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed–not ‘deconstructed’ … but destroyed.” (my underlined, bold words – Ed)

Need more proof?

… and, what does ISRAEL do?

In a small eastern city, Canadian taxpayers are “honoured in welcoming“, yet more illiterate and incompatible FOREIGNERS that cost upwards of $50,000(?) each! (Airfare, hotels, food, medical/dental services, ground transportation, hired enablers, ESL classes, clothing allowances. Then comes their FREE lifetime welfare cheques, and modern subsidized apartments, plus other free benefits, plus lots of FREE time to wander around our parks, civic gardens and modern shopping malls like pampered tourists.

In contrast, many destitute Canadian-born citizens having those often described “white privileges“, will sleep under bridges or on city grates, while yet another plane-load of unknown foreign “refugees” land on Canadian soil tonight.)
special photo toned f/x and grid, made form my images
City of Saint John’s newest “Refugees” (<click)

(The real costs of importing FOREIGN “refugees” from half-way around the world and ceremoniously planting them in our country … is never revealed by the mainstream media (MSM), nor by “your” government because they do NOT want you knowing about that minor detail.) 

Related:  Saint John – Happiest City In Canada (Posted in 2007)

Also read:

More Refugees to Support

Windsor’s Border Is Wide Open

700,000 “Refugees” Since 1987  (CANADA)

6 (Yes, just Six) “Refugees” in 2013 (JAPAN)

Censoring The People’s Internet

By Fred

[…]

Today, the Internet is the only free press we have, all that stands against total control of information.

Consider how relentlessly the media impose political correctness, how the slightest offense to the protected groups—we all know who they are—or to sacred policies leads to firing of reporters and groveling by politicians.  The wars are buried and serious criticism of Washington suppressed. That leaves the net, only the net, without which we would know nothing.

Which is why it must be, and will be censored … sooner, if Washington can get away with it, and later, if not. The tactics are predictable.

First, “hate speech” will be banned. The government will tell us whom we can hate, and whom we cannot. “Hatred” will be vaguely defined so that one will never be sure when one is engaging in it and, since it will be prosecutable, one will have to be very careful. Disapproval of favored groups, or of their behavior, will be defined as hatred. National security will be invoked, silencing whistle-blowers or, eventually, anything that might make the public uneasy with Washington’s wars.

The next step probably will be to block links to foreign sites deemed to transgress. China is good at this. The most likely avenue will be executive orders of increasingly Draconian nature, about which Congress and the Dead—the Supreme Court, I meant to say—will do nothing.

At that point, coming soon  to a theater near you, the United States as it was intended to be, and to an extent was, will be over. Our increasingly characterless young, raised to ignorance and “Appropriate Thought” by government schools, will question nothing. They will have no way of knowing that there is anything to question.

I suppose it can be debated whether the current enstupidation of the rising generations is deliberate or merely the consequence of a return to peasantry inescapable in a democracy. The petulance and immaturity running through so much of society may be inevitable in a spoiled people who have never had to do anything and have never been told “no.” Certainly, things today resemble the end games of other once-dominant cultures.

Mental darkness facilitates authoritarianism, and darkness we have.  Many college graduates can barely read. Their ignorance of history, politics, and geography (and practically everything else) is profound, and they see no reason why they should know anything. They seem not to suspect that there might be things worth knowing.

I am hard pressed to think of a society in such internal decline that has turned itself around, and I cannot imagine how ours might do so. One sure thing is that, once the Internet is gelded … there will be no hope at all. And the assault has begun.  …to Full Report

[For added emphasis, bolded, underlined, italicized words and links are by ELN Editor]

Also read:

“News” Vs Propaganda

Turn Your Television OFF

Mass Media: Smoke & Mirrors

INTERNET: Last Bastion of the Free Press

**********************************************

Start Your Own News Blog

Mass Mind Control Through MSM

What is Freedom to YOU?

By Pat

[Many] people today … know “something” is wrong with this society.

They see the “changes” that are really overt signs of decay. Most people are unhappy. Most people are fat. Most people don’t have fulfilling relationships. Most people are under financial pressure. Most people recognize that society at large is becoming more of a reflection of the 3rd world.

But they don’t know why.

Most people seem to find the concepts of freedom, knowledge, and the meaning of life to be perplexing in definition.

What is freedom to you? If you don’t have the option of doing the opposite – then you’re not free. How much freedom do you really have?

What is knowledge? If you can’t objectively and empirically justify your “belief” about something – then you merely hold a tentative idea … and it’s not knowledge.

What is the meaning of life to you? Is it control of your environment, and the subjugation of others by any means necessary, or is it the pursuit of truth – no matter where that leads?

What we are seeing is the advance of a certain group who hold that the meaning of life is to control the environment, and the subjugation of everyone else, by any means necessary. They are using certain tools to leverage this. The most pervasive is usury. Usury and the private issuance of monetary instruments at practically no cost to the issuer ensures that the private entity will own everything that the issued-money can buy. Adolf Hitler circumvented that by having Germany engage in straight barter with other countries – using no monetary instruments at all for international trade. They just “traded” finished goods for raw materials. That practice completely f*cked the jews.

[Read: Economic Plan of Germany’s NSDAP]

Another major tool “they” use against us … is the application of various forms or brainwashing. The science of mind manipulation is very advanced now. Watching them do this is is really quite interesting. In the past they primarily used Pavlovian methods of behavior and thought control … today electronic media uses a combination of hypnosis, NLP and a few other key techniques to induce reflexive responses in the target audiences.

Anyone with a lot of experience in martial arts will understand the concept of “setting up” the opponent by inducing a reflexive response – that is then taken advantage of in the form of another maneuver. The uninitiated won’t even understand what he’s seeing as the master engages an opponent to induce a reflex. Once that reflex happens, the master fluidly executes his real plan.

That is the real “Art” in fighting.

The Globalist Communists have been hard at work developing what I refer to as “Mental Martial Arts”. They apply these methods primarily through the TV, but they are also used in universities.

Without question, the TV is the most influential medium of mass communication ever. It has joined the toilet as a nearly ubiquitous feature of the modern human dwelling.

The “averageAmerican watches 5 hours and 11 minutes of television every single day. That’s 36 hours of TV every week. That translates into 1,872 hours. Let’s say … they averaged 8 hours of sleep each day and were awake for 16. That means they spend the equivalent of 117 entire waking days watching TV. If watching TV was limited to only 8 hours a day they’d be sitting there watching for 234 days straight. Obviously, TV watching is a massive issue.

Much of that “programming” has been devoted, either directly or indirectly at maligning the German National Socialists. To say that they “failed” and their ideas invalid does not reflect the facts.

They did not “fail”. They were bombed. They were subjected to mass murder. They were occupied and will continue to be occupied until at least 2099.

I submit that they succeeded and posed such an utter threat to the Globalist Communists, that even today NS ideas are feared by the Globalist Communists.

As for the Internet, it’s just a tool – but it is HEAVILY infiltrated. However, it can be used to a limited degree. The real action is in the real world with real people … and that is where much focus should be placed.

The conflict playing out before us is really very basic. I would prefer to see those whose view the meaning of life to be the pursuit of TRUTH – regardless of where that may lead — win. Source

VIDEO: Young Woman Tells Angry Black Man He Has a Slave Complex

ELN:

Good grief, another Emma West scenario where we have police chasing down another “dangerous word-utterer” on a transit system. The neutered White guy sitting beside her remains conspicuously silent while the black African foreigner wails away in his accented-English because the female passenger equated “slavery” to his African origins. Her “crime” was having noticed the man was actually BLACK, while the White hypocrites surrounding her … pretend not to notice because that’s considered “racist” in their indoctrinated mind-set.

Aided and abetted by her fellow Whites, this woman will now be hunted down, investigated and possibly charged with “hate” speech at a cost of thousands of man-hours and expense.

Originally posted on daily europa:

Video has emerged of a woman ranting at a black passenger on a crowded underground train before telling him: ‘you have a problem because you guys used to be slaves’.

Footage shows the young woman, who appears to be speaking with an eastern European accent, get into a heated argument with a man sitting opposite after apparently asking him to move seats.

Passengers can be heard shouting ‘shut up’ after she makes the racist remark. More footage uploaded to video sharing site Vine captures her saying: ‘I have black friends, I’m not racist.’

See how the media sell this story – it’s all the young woman’s fault in their eyes.

They want to portray this as a racist rant – even though the woman says she is ‘not a racist’ and has ‘black friends’.

The black guy obviously has a problem because he is shouting at this young woman for no…

View original 61 more words

Confronting Racial Realities

Also Read:

Scientific DNA Racial Profiling

Racial Differences Are Real

IQ And The Wealth of Nations

*********************************

Blacks LESS Intelligent?

Crime & Race

***************

Group Differences Are Real

Race/IQ Gap Explained

Advocate For Euro-Whites

Chinese-Canadian Activism Vs Academic Freedom

by Ricardo Duchesne
Since January 8 through January 22, the main media (MSM) outlets in Canada have paid considerable attention to my claim that mass immigration threatens Canada’s European character.
It all started back in early June when Vancouver city councillor, Kerry Jang, wrote a formal letter to the administration at The University of New Brunswick complaining about my allegedly “racist” views about Chinese Canadians, simply on the grounds that I had published a number of articles in this blog, Council of European Canadians, criticizing a motion passed by Raymond Louie, a Canadian with ancestry from China, urging council to direct staff to investigate discriminatory laws and policies imposed by the government on Chinese immigrants in the city between 1886 and 1947, in order to come up with recommendations for “reconciliation efforts.”
[Also see: Emboldened Minorities “Eye” Canada]
In this article, and a number of subsequent articles, including a formal “reply” to Jang and Louie, I objected to the endless demands for apologies and redresses by Chinese leaders in Vancouver, noting that many apologies and compensation packages had already been offered by various levels of government in Canada starting with Prime Minister Harper’s 2006 apology and $34 million financial compensation.
In the Council of European Canadians, I have written many articles consistent with the promotion and defense of the ethnic interests of European Canadians within the framework of the Canadian Multiculturalism Act of 1988, which guarantees the rights of Canadians of any racial origin to protect and enhance their cultural and ethnic interests in a way that is consistent with the principles of our liberal democratic institutions.A high number of my articles have been on the philosophical and historical aspects of the ideology of immigrant multiculturalism and on the uniqueness of Western Civilization. Readers will notice that these articles have been carefully researched, backed by many sources, involving carefully constructed arguments with some of the foremost scholars favoring Canadian multiculturalism and addressing the dynamics of Western civilization.Since this controversy erupted again in early January, I have been tempted to write a reply to the main articles which have appeared in The Globe and Mail, The National Post, CBC, Global News, The Tyee, four university student papers, and other venues. But the fact that the overwhelming majority of the comments in response to these articles have strongly supported my views and academic freedom to dissent, persuaded me not to offer a reply. I was satisfied too with the endorsement of academic freedom by the journalists at the Globe and Mail, the Post, and the Vancouver Sun.

January 22 article in The Globe and Mail

But yesterday January 22, in what is now the third article in The Globe and Mail about this controversy, three Chinese-Canadians not only disagreed but called upon The University of New Brunswick to censor me on the grounds that my views do not deserve to be expressed by any academic in Canada!

 Under the title, What this UNB professor practices is intolerance, not sociology, authors Avvy Go, Dora Nipp, and Winnie Ng, conclude:

“The purpose of academic freedom is to prevent a chill on the pursuit of knowledge and to safeguard diverse viewpoints. However, in Canada no right is absolute; in the case of academic freedom, this right starts to unravel when academics hide behind academic freedom to espouse untruths that actually inflict harm. If the staff and faculty of UNB are truly committed to academic freedom and academic excellence, they should join the Asian Canadian community in condemning racism in any form in Canada.”

This short, but falsehood-filled article, cannot go unchallenged. The authors are adamantly against my emphasis on the European character of Canada and how mass immigration threatens it.

Yet, a quick examination of the careers of Go, Nipp, and Ng reveals three lives fully dedicated to the promotion of Chinese ethnic interests in Canada combined with the portrayal of European Canadians in a persistently negative way. They eulogize about the “the pursuit of knowledge,” “academic standards,” and the “academic profession” but only Ng has some sort of position at a university.

Ng holds the “CAW-Sam Gindin Chair in Social Justice and Democracy at Ryerson University,” a position described as “the first union-endowed chair at a Canadian University.” Her university profile describes her as an “activist” and states that the “mandate” of the chair is “to create a hub of interaction between social justice activists and academics at Ryerson University.” Strictly speaking, then, Ng is not an academic hired as a professor, but holds a chair financed by a union, “selected not only for her extensive experience in the social justice field but for her research interests in anti-racism, equality, and coalition and capacity building.”

 There are no indications of peer-reviewed articles by Ng on the Internet except a report she co-authored with five other names with the title An Immigrant All Over Again? Recession, Plant Closures and [Older] Racialized Immigrant Workers.

Avvy Go is also not an academic but “director of the Metro Toronto Chinese & Southeast Asian Legal Clinic.” This clinic is dedicated to “advocacy activities” for selected ethnic groups in Canada, namely, Chinese, Vietnamese, and Laotian communities in Greater Toronto.

Dora Nipp is CEO of the Multicultural History Society of Ontario; her career in Canada has revolved around the promotion and struggles of Chinese Canadians in the face of “racist” Europeans.

These three activists for Chinese/Asian interests show no hesitation declaring that:

“Mr. Duchesne spreads falsehoods about an entire community and in doing so betrays the standards of academia by engaging in racial caricature and perpetuating intolerance.”

It is the other way around; in this article, these three Chinese/Asian ethnonationalists spread many falsehoods about what I have said and caricature the entire community of European Canadians by concentrating solely on their “racist” and “colonial” activities.

“Efforts by Asian and African Canadians to claim their rightful place in Canadian history are framed by Mr. Duchesne as “assaulting European civilization”.

[ELN Editor note: Conflating ethnocentric Chinese pursuits with Black people is highly disingenuous. Marxist/leftists often use this method of combining phantom support forces as a protective barrier for weak arguments against their debating opponents. It’s also a power-play designed to muster other forces against the White-majority until those “others” have outlived their usefulness. See: New CHINESE Political Party in Canada]

This is untrue. I have never written aboutAfrican Canadians,” for starters, and have never framed Asian arguments about their role in Canada as “assaulting European civilization.”

 They offer no evidence for these cited words because I have not written anything close to this claim. I have simply criticized some current Chinese leaders in Canada for their continual demands for apologies and financial compensation from current Canadians (who had nothing to do with the head tax), and have also written historically based articles challenging their interpretation of the origins and context of the head tax.

They continue:

“In claiming this, Mr. Duchesne ignores the historical fact that the “founding” of Canada took place on the land of indigenous peoples, and that in the name of “preserving European civilization” systemic exclusion and colonial domination has been inflicted on the First Peoples. It is hard to avoid reading Mr. Duchesne’s notion of “European civilization” and “Britishness” as something resembling white supremacy.”

How can the argument that Canada was founded by European Canadians be categorized as a form of “White supremacy” if Canada, was in fact created by Europeans?

 Why don’t they respond to my fact-filled article Canada Is a Nation Created by Diverse Immigrants’ — A False Meme?
As late as 1971 — when multiculturalism was officially introduced — the ethnic composition of the nation was 96% European, at which point all the institutions, legal system, educational curriculum, transformation of wilderness into productive farms, all the cities, the parliamentary traditions, the churches, the entire infrastructure of railways, ports, shipping industries, and highways, had been created by hardworking Europeans. This is not to say that other minorities were not participants; it is to emphasize the salient reality of Canada’s European culture.
Robson Street in Vancouver, BC — 50 years ago!
I have never endorsed any of the actions that were inflicted against indigenous peoples, or against any NON-White immigrant, but have simply tried to offer a view of Canada that does not stereo-typify Europeans as inherently “racist”, and other minorities as inherently “benevolent”.
 Millions of current European Canadians are tired of having the history of their ancestors categorized solely by the words “systematic exclusion and colonial domination.” This is clearly a form of “racial caricature.”

“It matters not to individuals like Mr. Duchesne that Chinese people first landed on Canada’s west coast in 1744, came to pan for gold in 1858, and in 1881 were brought to Canada to help build the Canadian Pacific Railway. It appears immaterial to Mr. Duchesne that Chinese Canadians have a longstanding presence in Canada. Similarly, South Asians have made Canada their home since the turn of the last century.”

Everyone knows this. What they don’t know are facts such as the following:

 From 1608 to 1760, immigration to New France (Quebec) consisted of only 10,000 settlers, and thereafter it was “almost non-existent.” The French-speaking population numbered about 70,000 in the 1760s, and thereafter, until the late 1800s, the population expanded rapidly through the high fertility rate of mothers, 5.6 surviving children on average, and not at all through immigration. By 1950, the Quebec population was almost 4 million. This increase was not a result of immigration, but of continuing high fertility rates. It was only in the 1970s that Montreal saw an increasing inflow of non-European immigrants.

But these three (Chinese/Asian) activists don’t highlight the struggles of Quebec mothers, (and) how hard it was for them to make a living in the harsh climate of Canada. Instead, they prefer to make a living by depicting Europeans in the worst possible light as “supremacists“, and then they have the nerve to complain about “racial caricatures”.

 [See: Racist Chinese Attack Minority Child]

The next few sentences are just typical complaints about the “tremendous discrimination” Asians suffered and still suffer in Canada — if so, why do millions keep coming?

How about the horrendous acts of human-rights violations in China, rampant racism and destruction of the lifestyles of ethnic minorities, sickening treatment of animals, and commercial dealings in body organs?
[See: Chinese Zoo NOT For Timid Patrons
Dying For Their DOG Fur]

“[I]t is 2015 and one expects a more enlightened populace today — one that includes all peoples and rejects the portrayal of Canada as one preserved for “Europeans” only.”

My argument is not that Canada should be preserved for Europeans only; it is that the policy of multiculturalism encourages Canadians from all ethnic backgrounds to affirm their heritage and culture, and that if we are to be consistent and not follow a double standard,we should stop prohibiting European Canadians from pursuing their own ethnic interests in the same way that these three (Chinese/Asian) activists have made entire careers pursuing the ethnic interests of Asians in Canada.

“Duchesne is a professor of history and sociology, but he has brought the academic profession into disrepute.”

There are no indications that these three (Chinese/Asian) activists know much about the history and sociology profession; whereas I have an extensive list of publications in both fields. The three of them combined — as far as I can tell from a search of the Internet — do not have a single referred publication.

“Mr. Duchesne’s intolerant statements will run the risk of inciting fear and resentment toward Canadians of Asian heritage by reinforcing stereotypes of the ethnic Chinese as perpetual foreigners. He glorifies scholarship and writing that fuels xenophobia and provides fodder for white supremacy. Mr. Duchesne is a unicultural ideologue.”

They have no evidence that I have reinforced stereotypes about Chinese Canadians; what is the case is that I don’t accept their demands for endless apologies and “inclusive redresses.”

 Go, Nipp, and Ng are the ones who have fueled xenophobia through many years of activism against European Canadians, polarizing Canadians into the “bad”, “racist” Whites and the “innocent” minorities.

The Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada’s Statement on Academic Freedom (2011)…sets out the responsibilities of academic freedom, which include: evidence and truth must be the guiding principles…committed to the highest ethical standards in their teaching and research; faculty should examine data, question assumptions and be guided by evidence; and faculty and university leadership are obligated to ensure that students’ human rights are respected.

These 3 (Chinese/Asian) activists are welcome to take a look at my extensively reviewed book, The Uniqueness of Western Civilization, which cites over 800 different books and articles, and which even critics have praised for its very high academic standards. I am also a highly-liked professor at my university, with high levels of student registration in my courses. What the students like most about my classes is that they don’t get only the leftist view of things, but three or four viewpoints.

 The textbook required for my Introduction to Sociology course, for example, is a typical radical-leftist text, in addition to which I offer students alternative readings with libertarian, old conservative, and European nationalist perspectives. I often say to students that they can follow any viewpoint; all that I require of them is to show awareness of alternative views, (and) take them into account in their writings.

I don’t object to the enthusiasm Go, Nipp, and Ng exhibit for Asian issues and historical contributions to Canada. It is natural that they care about their people. I object to the current double standard which says that only NON-Europeans have a moral right to protect and enhance their ethnic interests. I am for a level playing field in the Canadian multicultural arena, with European Canadians enjoying the same rights as other ethnic groups in the defense of their heritage and cultural lineage. It is that simple.  >Source

 (For added emphasis — bolded, italicized, underlined and parenthesis words, videos and some links by ELN Editor.)
Also read:
Emboldened Racial Minorities “Eye” Canada
New CHINESE Political Party in Canada
New Zealanders Against Asian Invasion
*******************************************
Our First P.M. Warned Us
Government Disloyal To Its Own Citizens

2013 in review

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2013 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

The Louvre Museum has 8.5 million visitors per year. This blog was viewed about 110,000 times in 2013. If it were an exhibit at the Louvre Museum, it would take about 5 days for that many people to see it.

Click here to see the complete report.

Leftists/Conservatives Equally Guilty

By Vanishing American

English: Assemblyman Rory Lancman, Public Advo...

Assemblyman Rory Lancman, Public Advocate Bill De Blasio, and New York City Councilman Brad Lander.

Both Sides Do This

The left-wing columnist named Richard Cohen is being pummeled by some of his liberal brethren for making certain observations about Bill De Blasio, New York City mayor-elect, and his family. This is causing Schadenfreude by some on the pro-White right.

But this is just what we see on the ‘respectable right‘, where they police conservatives and Whites, in general, to find any evidence of ‘racist‘ speech or actions. I would expect that most of the media leftists who are calling for Cohen’s head are White or Whitish. So this is just another case of Whites turning on each other to prove their own virtue and innocence regarding these radioactive racial issues.

This is just a consequence of ‘diversity‘, this mandated and enforced state of living amongst Others. We cannot discuss freely amongst ourselves lest some holier-than-thou fellow White excoriates us for not toeing the PC (political-correct) line.

Diversity leads to conflict among the people of a host nation which has many people of disparate groups living within their territory. Some people, for whatever reason, will defend unknown outsiders in preference to their own kin and neighbors, or even family members.

As it stands now, blacks are the people who have the most advocates and militant defenders amongst Whites. Ever since the Civil Rights Revolution, Whites have been subtly and not-so-subtly mobilized to defend blacks, particularly, in a knee-jerk fashion against even the slightest criticism. Whites defend blacks more ardently than they would ever defend their own, perhaps even their own family, as witness the case of the late Amy Biehl and her indoctrinated parents.

Suppose, just suppose … that some impartial alien from another planet were to observe our society. What would such a stranger make of the situation amongst our people, where so many of us behave like programmed robots in offering a defense of those who are hostile and inimical to us … often at the expense of ourselves, our kin and neighbors?

But, we have no such impartial observer to tell us how bizarre and unnatural this behavior is; the allegedly objective people we call “psychologists” are of no use because they, too, are under the PC spell — and ”spell” is not an inappropriate word. The philosophers and clergy also are infected with this strange xenophilia, and are also prone to join the hordes who go around calling “racist!” … in response to any mention of unmentionable truths.

Republican and Democrat are also infected with this mania, or (are) under this programming, and one side is only better in only the slightest sense. Almost everyone is part of this xenomania to a greater or lesser extent; Republicans manifest it in different ways, and cater to different ”others”. But only a few seem to have been mysteriously inoculated against it, and they are the only ones who offer any hope in this situation.

In the meantime Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, other, practically all the politicians and media are party to this mutual witch-hunting. When will enough be enough?  >Source: http://vanishingamerican.blogspot.ca/2013/11/both-sides-do-this.html

[For added emphasis, links, underlined, bolded and italicized words by ELN Editor]

WAKE UP, Britain!

From: I Am An ENGLISHMAN

Former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher

Former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher

In the time of Margaret Thatcher, when the politician, the banker, the businessman and the lawyer advised us to put the privatisation, downsizing and outsourcing of our country’s industry before the jobs that our sons and daughters would lose, and the drugs our future-less grandchildren would turn to … a good many [citizens] followed that advice.

In the time of Blair and Brown, when we were told that “globalisation” and interdependence, concepts — guaranteed by definition — to rob us of our identity, control our own affairs and [provide] more jobs, “were wonderful things“, we didn’t wholly agree, but we didn’t make much of an effort to disagree either.

When the same men insisted that the invasion of Iraq was essential if we wished to remain “safe”, two million British people protested publicly … but most of us did nothing but grumble as America, Oil, Israel and their Downing Street champions forced us into a war that almost no one wanted.

The Chosen also told us that mass immigration was necessary and good for us. The immigrant may have believed this … but, very few others did.

We have been betrayed, ladies and gentlemen, and the fact that so many are still voting for those who have betrayed us … is a terrible indictment upon what we are now.

If you were to work your way through just 10% of the contents of this Blog, and then take the trouble to verify those things you find difficult to believe, your life would change forever.

You would no longer be able to pretend that the politicians and the media-darlings have not lied to you on a major scale, or that they sometimes have your best interests at heart. The truth would be there inside your head and you would never be able to shake free from it. It wouldn’t be just another loser spouting conspiracy theory, it would be you who was figuring things out, and playing the Cassandra with your friends, family and neighbours.

It’s a burden. To know the truth when it is not fashionable is hard. To tell the truth when honesty is illegal is even harder.

If you know it, say it anyway. No matter what pressure THEY put upon you to desist.

Just to give you a bit of a clue as to what we are really up against, I’d like to introduce you to the most Orwellian declaration of intent that I have ever read in a mainstream British newspaper.

The journalist who wrote what you are about to read, felt secure enough in his own elite establishment role to lay his totalitarian beliefs on the line in his own Guardian column (28 February 1999 – http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/1999/feb/28/lawrence.ukcrime4) and, as the newspaper’s editor and owners were content to see such material published, one must presume that they also were not averse to seeing such a Brave New World imposed upon the dumb, British herd.

This is what was said:

“WIDESPREAD AND VIGOROUS MISCEGENATION (race mixing)… IS THE BEST ANSWER…

Teachers are the most effective anti-racist campaigners in the country, this means more than education in other religions, IT MEANS A FORM OF POLITICAL EDUCATION.

Only people who understand the economic forces changing their world, THREATENING THEM… have a chance of being immune to the old tribal chants…

THE FINAL ANSWER, FRANKLY, IS THE VIGOROUS USE OF STATE POWER TO COERCE AND REPRESS… I FIRMLY BELIEVE THAT REPRESSION CAN BE A GREAT, CIVILISING INSTRUMENT FOR GOOD.

STAMP HARD ON CERTAIN ‘NATURAL’ BELIEFS FOR LONG ENOUGH AND YOU CAN ALMOST KILL THEM OFF…

A NEW RACE RELATIONS ACT WILL IMPOSE THE WILL OF THE STATE ON MILLIONS.”

When I read this article I felt the hairs stand up on the back of my neck.

[FRANCE, Too! This traitorous President of France encourages the traditional citizens of France to race-mix with Africans, Indians or any race not of their own. In fact, all traditional WHITE NATIONS have come under the same agenda of enforced MISCEGENATION (race mixing) … and ONLY White Nations.

The world’s minority Euro-White people are only 8 percent of the world’s population, and diminishing in numbers every year.]

1984? Animal Farm? We had arrived, we were there already. It wasn’t paranoia after all, it was very, very real. It didn’t matter what we did, it didn’t matter what we said, it didn’t matter what we wanted, it didn’t matter how we voted, the same old dark manipulators would always be in charge and we better start getting used to it.

Or else.

BBC Politics journalist Andrew Marr on the red...

BBC Politics journalist Andrew Marr

The liberal commissar responsible for the casual “sabre rattle” recorded above … was none other than that most languid Master of political ceremonies, Andrew Marr, top bloke at the BBC, eponymous host of Sunday morning’s “Andrew Marr Show” and one of the most powerful political journalists of the age.

The chattering classes have every bit as much of a hold over our lives as the politicians do.

They hand our opinions to us on a plate, they shape our beliefs and attitudes. Everything the media throws at us, from cradle to grave, affects the way we behave and think.

Shiny eyed zealots such as Andrew Marr, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown do not care what we want or feel — they care only for the promised land that their wisdom, their insight and their determination will lead us on to in the future.

So now you know.

Now you know what THEY have been doing all this time. Now you know what THEY have been thinking all this time. Now you know what THEY are still doing and thinking and will carry on doing and thinking until THEY are stopped.

And they won’t stop, you know. They won’t, all of a sudden, come to their senses. They won’t change their minds and have some kind of Damascene conversion when they realise what terrible damage their idiot, schoolboy Bolshevism has done to us. You see, we don’t count, they do. We don’t know, they do. It’ll be good for us in the long run, you see.

We don’t seem to have realised that “repression can be a great, civilising instrument for good“. We don’t seem to be aware that if evangelistic upper-crust brainboxes like Marr, Brown and Blairstamp hard on certain natural beliefs for long enough” and “kill them off“, why, we’ll all live happily ever after in their global, elite-run Wonderland!

United Kingdom Chancellor of the Exchequer Gor...

Former Prime Minister Gordon Brown

I mean, has Gordon Brown changed his globalist tune since sub-prime, the credit-crunch and world-wide recession blew the banker-cuddling “Prudent Chancellor” out of the water?

Ladies and gentlemen, in just one 18 April 2008 speech, he used the word “global” and its derivatives 79 TIMES! Well, he’s hardly stopped using the same New World Order buzz-words since, despite the fact that what we are having to endure now, has come about as a direct result of unfettered globalisation.

Remember this, folks: that’s us … that Andrew Marr was talking about. The British people.  >  Source

[…]

Also Read:

Destroying European Civilization

50 Million Africans Invited To EUROPE

Did YOU Know?

A Black family born in a white-ruled nation is forced to live in poverty-stricken conditions because:

1) … the unemployed father is DENIED his sovereign right to lawfully seek employment in the nation’s job market because of his swarthy complexion. “Employment-equity/affirmative action” exists to serve only the White majority population … not the Black minority.

2)… the Black family is DENIED access to social welfare benefits and forced to live “rough” on city streets, or in makeshift, unsanitary squatter camps without running water, nor with proper toilet facilities, or they’re forced to live in rural barns alongside pigs and other farm animals.

Additionally, and further out into the country’s expanse of rural farmland, hard-working Black farmers and their families are systematically being slaughtered to death without remorse by marauding, blood-thirsty White murderers plundering their isolated homes. The Black Women and children are often raped and tortured in the most gruesome, gut-wrenching manner.

Now, you’d be correct to ask … something is not quite right here?!

That’s because NONE of this described scenario is true!

But — reverse the racial components — and you’ll discover the events described … are actually occurring to White people in today’s Black-run South Africa.

In fact, many North American and European household pets (cats and dogs) are treated better, and enjoy a higher standard of living than what impoverished White people receive in South Africa.

You will not find these noteworthy stories reported in western newspapers, or by listening to your television news reader … so read on and validate this deliberately suppressed news for yourself.

WARNING: Gruesome photos of MURDERED White South Africans.

http://ajkraad.wix.com/genocide-museum/#! 

**************************************


***************************************

(Note: The term “Afrikaners” (Boer) refers to WHITE PEOPLE born, raised, or living in South Africa … whose first language is Afrikaans and whose original ancestors were Dutch Europeans … the very White people responsible for inventing, building and successfully establishing the country itself.)

White South Africans Fighting Back!

Read:

South African Killing Fields

“Kill the Boer, Kill the Farmer”

South African Child SEX-SLAVES

****************************

White South Africans DENIED Jobs

****************************

White GENOCIDE In South Africa

South Africa – GENOCIDAL Slaughter-House

*******************************

South African BLACK Empowerment

… other South African news items
are found in the “Category” link
in the right side-bar, or click HERE.

For more updated South African
news items on this subject
matter, check out:

http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.ca/

Post Navigation

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 123 other followers

%d bloggers like this: