by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/054579_FBI_DOJ_elaborate_theater.html#ixzz4DkIYhQDl
“My message of truth is not of much interest to 99% of the population. They are far too happy in their Golden Corral, GMO-infested junk food eat-a-thon fairy tale illusions to ever bother investigating reality. There is virtually zero risk to the establishment that my words will ever be embraced by more than a tiny fraction of the population.”
ANOTHER truth-telling blogger laments: HERE
Canadian Judge rules WHITE scholarship would threaten “safety of the state”
by Steve Goode
Before Dr. Victor Priebe died … he wrote in his will that he wanted his money to be used to set up a scholarship for single, straight, White people who are studying science.
Judge Alissa Mitchell, has ruled that this will not be allowed because it will according to her, threaten the “safety of the state.”
“Although it is not expressly stated by Dr. Priebe that he subscribed to white supremacist, homophobic and misogynistic views … [the will’s instructions] leave no doubt as to Dr. Priebe’s views,” she said.
“People are allowed to be eccentric,” she said, “It’s fairly stringent, these requirements. It’s the ‘safety’ of the state that (has to be) at risk, and it’s a universally recognized risk, not just that a few people might disagree with what this person is doing.”
Priebe’s will … stated that his money should be given to “Caucasian, male, single, heterosexual students,” and to a “hard-working, single Caucasian White girl who is not feminist or lesbian.”
Today in Canada … there are scholarships for NON-white women, for American Indians, for Sikhs, and for non-Canadian citizens. But a scholarship specifically for Whites is denied because the elites are anti-White … despite most of them being White themselves.
For example, there was a scholarship in 1990 for White people of British origin, and that was ruled as “discriminatory”.
You see — CANADA — like so many formerly White countries, is no longer allowed to remain White. It must become “diverse” and “multicultural” without any democratic choice or discussion … because its elite have decided so.
They’re trying to get rid of the White majority, and according to international law, this is a program of White genocide. They can use as many buzzwords as the like, but “diversity” is simply just their code word for White genocide. >Source
“(Racial) ‘Diversity’ is a massive, long-term BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION program that uses minorities to DISINHERIT the majority“. >Henry Makow, PhD
Click centre arrow to watch.
NIGERIA — 180,000,000 people
IRELAND — 4,680,000 people
Here’s a quote from a commenter at Irish Savant’s blog.
“G. Brock Chisholm, former director of the World Health Organization (OMS), proves that he has learned the lesson of Kalergi well when he says: “What people in all places have to do is to limit of birthrates and promote mixed marriages (between different races), this aims to create a single race in a world which will be directed by a central authority. ”
This spells it out in so many words. Some people are reluctant to believe that there could be a concerted effort in this direction. There is a reason why just about every advertising image, “Public Service Announcement” on TV, and every movie and TV series pushes the mixed union, usually black male and White female, sometimes White male and Asian female. The latter image also reflects a certain reality: this is the most common type of interracial couple in our society, though many insist that it is the black male/White female couple.
WE will aid the NEGROES to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the PROFESSIONS and in the world of SPORTS and ENTERTAINMENT. With this prestige, the NEGRO will be able to INTERMARRY with the Whites, and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.” “A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century“, 1912 – Israel Cohen, (Zionist/Internationalist/Communist)
But these people, these globalist fanatics, have stated openly what they intend to do, and they have made it clear that they expect us to comply and acquiesce — and in fact, not only that — but they expect us to ”celebrate” our becoming dispossessed, ethnically cleansed, and ultimately blended out of existence.
[What’s the percentage (%) of WHITE people on Earth? ANSWER.]
I can only guess that most people don’t take these statements seriously because of the ”normalcy bias”, or perhaps they just don’t wish to believe it. Believing it might require that people give up their passivity and begin to be more than sideline-sitters, as all this plays out. The very least that people might do is to speak out and object vehemently, and encourage their children to be loyal to their own, to their forebears and to their future progeny. Still … there’s a price to be paid, even for such natural behaviors in this upside-down world. >Source
Jewish Professor Noel Ignatiev
More from Brock Chisholm:
‘To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men, their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism and religious dogmas.”
The homogeneous ENGLAND that was once was! (early 1960s)
By Frederick Dixon
If you were lucky – because it received little (media) coverage – you will have caught a news item the other day; that the percentage of White British births in England and Wales fell in 2014 to its lowest level ever of 65.3%.
Well, of course it was the lowest level ever (so far) because until not so long ago, and well within living memory, nearly everyone in the country was White British, so naturally were nearly all of the births.
But, it’s been downhill ever since the first Jamaicans stepped off the Empire Windrush at Tilbury in June 1948, and the decline has accelerated since the beginning of the century – in 2005 around 72% of births were White British, in 2009 the figure had fallen to 68.8% (the only two years for which I have been able to find relevant figures before 2014) … and now down to 65.3%.
(Read: Britain On Suicide Watch)
These figures imply an annual rate of decline of nearly 0.7%. If it continues at that rate White British births will be a minority in little more than 20 years, which tallies nicely with a forecast by the Department for Education (or whatever it’s called nowadays) that White British pupils will be a minority in schools in England by 2037. The relevant word, of course, is “if” – Britain might exit the EU and thus recover the right to control our own borders; we might hope, however faintly, that we will get a government with the will to do just that, but the prospect of such a government became more remote than ever when David Cameron morphed into Tony Blair at the recent Conservative Party conference!
That this headlong decline to dispossession is indeed halted is something for which we should all hope and work. But even if it is halted, what then? We will find ourselves in a country in which, we White British, are just one of a multitude of races and cultures sharing what was, until the day before yesterday … our homeland. Our only real long term chance of survival as an identifiable people is to act and think in our own interests as an ethnicity, as a people with an identity and with interests quite distinct from those of the nation state in which we find ourselves living.
London, England – TODAY
Once upon a time the “nation”, and the “race” were the same, and >continued HERE.
Update: JUNE, 2017 – Young British Woman Speaks Out
From: Red Ice Creations
Matthew Heimbach is a Towson University graduate with a Bachelors degree in History. He was the chapter leader of Youth for Western Civilization at Towson University, which was forcibly shut down by the school administration.
Matthew and his members created the Towson White Student Union (WSU), a group dedicated to advancing the cultural, political and social interests of European-American students. After finishing college, Matthew and the Towson WSU joined forces with other dedicated White activists to create the Traditionalist Youth Network (TYN), a group dedicated to defending faith, family and folk on high school and college campuses around America.
Matt talks about the different engagements he organized on campus to bring forth a new awareness of White student interests and to underscore the tremendous double standards that exist surrounding ethnic advocacy groups in formidably left-leaning educational institutions. Then, Matt explains his inspiration to take a stand for White interests and organize a healthy, organic movement in the spirit of celebrating the traditions and ancestry of his folk.
Matt describes his ideas concerning a Southern American secession, and we look at the US’s founding Judaeo-masonic alliance. We analyze the attacks on Southern heritage following the recent Charleston shooting tragedy, along with the US’s demographical shift to swelling immigrant populations with little regard for national pride and legacy.
In the members’ segment, we look ahead to the future of America in light of the radical political overhaul of the past 25 years that has quickly advanced the country towards a degradation of both infrastructure and quality of life. We also get into the media’s disingenuous reporting of crimes against Whites, with slanderous stories cherry-picked to further fuel the hatred towards pro-White communities. Matt shares some of the objectives of the TYN, all of which are aimed at a total reorientation of energy/resources away from the senseless global conglomerate and towards a more instinctual family/community tribe lifestyle that is focused in preserving natural order. >Listen HERE.
|They’re telling you: ‘Forget your history, Europeans … envision a future Canada without Whites.’|
[The way we were BEFORE mass 3rd-world, non-white immigration: City of Toronto – Yonge St. PHOTOS circa 1970s]
In 1988, multiculturalism in Canada officially became government policy. This was the year the policy became entrenched in our constitution, thereby completing a seventeen year long transition from political ideology to legislated government policy.
Within Canadian society, this is fairly common knowledge. What may be less well known is that on an international scale, constitutionally-based multiculturalism is a rarity. In fact, only two nations in the world have such a policy: Canada and Australia. While many countries promote the concept of diversity, a mere (1%) of the world’s nations are officially multicultural.
At present, Canada has the highest per-capita immigration rates in the world. In conjunction with legislated multiculturalism, the impact upon our nation has been profound — so profound, it is arguable the long-term result will be a complete reinvention of Canadian society.
|White man smiling at his own replacement cohorts|
For decades, Canadians have been informed by government that multiculturalism is equitable, and beneficial to all. Is this really the case? The answer, one which may surprise a great number of Canadians … is absolutely not.
The reason for this cannot be found simply by reading the statute’s content — though it does contain explicit wording which validates its negative impact — but rather, in the degree to which external circumstances surrounding the policy have changed.
One of the most relevant issues is the manner in which our society has defined the word “minority” — as in one of Canada’s minority communities. In 1988, the definition was relatively straight forward. The reasons for this are simple enough: in terms of overall population these communities were clearly in the minority.
In this regard, however, things have obviously changed. Decades of large-scaleIMMIGRATION, particularly from Asia and the Middle East, have rendered the traditional meaning of the term irrelevant. Dozens of constituencies in Canada are majority non-white — for example Richmond, B.C., and Brampton, Ontario.
What is the difference between a country like the U.S., who promote “diversity”, and a country such as Canada, which has the official policy? The answer isMONEY — as in monetaryFUNDING — as in the fact that multicultural policy mandates that our tax payer dollars … hundreds of millions of them, be given to ethnic and multicultural organizations to promote their specific culture and identity.
Is this necessarily unfair, or harmful? No, unless a situation were to develop whereby the so-called “minority” becomes the dominant population within the host community. In 2014, this was the case in twenty-six out of Canada’s 308 political ridings. A number of additional ridings will soon find themselves in a similar situation.
Let us consider the ramifications of this new reality. Canadians of European descent are now minorities within these twenty-six ridings — and yet hundreds of millions of dollars are still being funnelled to multicultural organizations to promote their cultural agendas — despite the fact they are no longer minorities at all. On the flip side, the freshly-minted Caucasian-minorities receive nothing. Even more disconcerting, is the fact that when citizens point out the inequality of the present system, the pro-multicultural forces play what is known as the “race card”.
What is this curious phrase all about? In basic terms, playing the race card occurs when multicultural leaders accuse those who question the funding, or any other aspect of multicultural orIMMIGRATION policy, of behaving in a “racist” manner. Lacking a sound, logical rebuttal, they deliver the only tool they have in their arsenal: the race card. Thus far, it has proven to protect their interests successfully. The positive news is, however, the general public are beginning to understand the insidious world of what can most appropriately be called “Multicult” Canada.
To comprehend the full scope of the Multicult’s influence upon our society, we must first realize that the agenda is not served up on a platter for all to understand. It is very much a hidden operation, and not intended for general public understanding. For instance, is the public aware of multiculturalism’s influence within our institutions of higher learning? They certainly should be. Hundreds of millions of dollars are being provided to our largest universities for the purpose of promoting non-democratic political ideology to Canadian-born students. That is, the few of them still walking the halls of University of Toronto, McGill, or University of British Columbia. UBC’s own data tells us the percentage of Canadian-born students on campus is eroding at a rapid pace, largely due to the fact that foreign students pay double, and even triple, the tuition fees of Canadian students.
As with our multicultural organizations, communism on campus is largely paid for by Canadian tax payers. Less commonly understood, is the fact, that a significant portion of the funding comes directly from China’s Ministry of Education. Bottom line? Canadian tax payers, along with the government of China, have paid for the establishment of “Asian Studies” departments throughout our university system. The most conspicuous example is our half-dozen branches of China’s Confucius Institute. There used to be more, however due to accusations that the organization is little more than a propaganda arm of China’s government, a number of universities have formally severed ties with the organization.
Throughout our business community, multiculturalism, or “diversity”, as the banking industry prefers to call it, is trumpeted within the board rooms of all major Canadian corporations. They can dress it up with a fancy word, but they cannot take away the fact that in reality, diversity meansHIRING a person based on their ethnicity, rather than their job qualifications. Even under these circumstances, pro-Multicult leaders and academics continue to bash White Canadians for having the nerve to be better qualified for jobs, or for having a full command of one of our official languages.
Multiculturalism in Canada has long become aMONEY-MAKINGindustry which is eradicating traditional Canadian culture, heritage and identity. Clearly, the situation is serious business. […] [M]ulticultural policy in Canada has led to a situation whereby the Canadian public are funding the demise of their own culture. Over half a billion dollars ($500,000,000) has been taken from tax payers and delivered to a relatively small collection of multicultural organizations, ostensibly for purposes of ethnic “cultural promotion”. At least, promoting their ethnicity is what they used to do. Today, the use of the money goes well beyond promotion, and is presently being utilized to undermine traditional Canadian identity, culture and religion, as well as our official languages.
It all sounds rather ominous. However, upon close inspection of the activities of organizations such as Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada, SUCCESSIMMIGRANT SERVICES, Mosaic, and Canada-China Business Council — often in tandem with our real estate or banking industries — a tangible pattern of cultural erosion can be detected.
All the while, Canadians go about their daily business, the majority of whom are simply unaware of the multicultural power game playing out within their nation. There have been, however, some promising signs of change. Several articles which recently appeared in mainstream news (MSM) publications have helped expose the nation of China’s influence upon Canada’s real estate market. In Vancouver, a petition to regulate foreign real estate investment has gathered over 24,000 signatures. Most recently, a public rally took place to protest a growing lack of home affordability. Even Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson, an absolute champion of all-things-China, issued a public statement on the need for “something to be done” to help with home affordability for lower and middle income residents.
In short, Canadians are beginning to push back against enforced multiculturalism andIMMIGRATION — both of which were implemented without public input, or approval. Frankly, it is about time. The fact is, if the status quo is maintained for much longer … traditional Canadian culture, heritage and identity will become fully marginalized, and eventually eliminated.