White British Births In Steep Decline

ENGLAND (early 1960s)

By Frederick Dixon

If you were lucky – because it received little (media) coverage – you will have caught a news item the other day; that the percentage of White British births in England and Wales fell in 2014 to its lowest level ever of 65.3%.

Well, of course it was the lowest level ever (so far) because until not so long ago, and well within living memory, nearly everyone in the country was White British, so naturally were nearly all of the births. But, it’s been downhill ever since the first Jamaicans stepped off the Empire Windrush at Tilbury in June 1948, and the decline has accelerated since the beginning of the century – in 2005 around 72% of births were White British, in 2009 the figure had fallen to 68.8% (the only two years for which I have been able to find relevant figures before 2014) … and now down to 65.3%.

(Read: Britain On Suicide Watch)

These figures imply an annual rate of decline of nearly 0.7%. If it continues at that rate White British births will be a minority in little more than 20 years, which tallies nicely with a forecast by the Department for Education (or whatever it’s called nowadays) that White British pupils will be a minority in schools in England by 2037. The relevant word, of course, is “if” – Britain might exit the EU and thus recover the right to control our own borders; we might hope, however faintly, that we will get a government with the will to do just that, but the prospect of such a government became more remote than ever when David Cameron morphed into Tony Blair at the recent Conservative Party conference!

That this headlong decline to dispossession is indeed halted is something for which we should all hope and work. But even if it is halted, what then? We will find ourselves in a country in which, we White British, are just one of a multitude of races and cultures sharing what was, until the day before yesterday … our homeland. Our only real long term chance of survival as an identifiable people is to act and think in our own interests as an ethnicity, as a people with an identity and with interests quite distinct from those of the nation state in which we find ourselves living.

London, England – TODAY

Once upon a time the “nation”, and the “race” were the same, and  >continued HERE.

Also read:

Last Call for WHITE Britain

How Britain Destroyed Itself

Telling IT, Like It IS

Red Ice Interviews Matt Heimbach

From: Red Ice Creations

Matthew Heimbach is a Towson University graduate with a Bachelors degree in History. He was the chapter leader of Youth for Western Civilization at Towson University, which was forcibly shut down by the school administration.

Matthew and his members created the Towson White Student Union (WSU), a group dedicated to advancing the cultural, political and social interests of European-American students. After finishing college, Matthew and the Towson WSU joined forces with other dedicated White activists to create the Traditionalist Youth Network (TYN), a group dedicated to defending faith, family and folk on high school and college campuses around America.

Matt talks about the different engagements he organized on campus to bring forth a new awareness of White student interests and to underscore the tremendous double standards that exist surrounding ethnic advocacy groups in formidably left-leaning educational institutions. Then, Matt explains his inspiration to take a stand for White interests and organize a healthy, organic movement in the spirit of celebrating the traditions and ancestry of his folk.

Matt describes his ideas concerning a Southern American secession, and we look at the US’s founding Judaeo-masonic alliance. We analyze the attacks on Southern heritage following the recent Charleston shooting tragedy, along with the US’s demographical shift to swelling immigrant populations with little regard for national pride and legacy.

In the members’ segment, we look ahead to the future of America in light of the radical political overhaul of the past 25 years that has quickly advanced the country towards a degradation of both infrastructure and quality of life. We also get into the media’s disingenuous reporting of crimes against Whites, with slanderous stories cherry-picked to further fuel the hatred towards pro-White communities. Matt shares some of the objectives of the TYN, all of which are aimed at a total reorientation of energy/resources away from the senseless global conglomerate and towards a more instinctual family/community tribe lifestyle that is focused in preserving natural order.  >Listen HERE.

Also read:

Minority Whites Fighting Back

White Students Demand Equal Rights


Brainwashing University Students

“All Whites Are Racist” – University

“Whiteness Studies” Demands an Explanation

Selling Out OUR Nation

Paying for Our Own Demise: Euro-Canadians Fund “Multicult” Canada

Multicultural policy in Canada has led to a situation, whereby the Canadian public are funding the demise of their own culture. 

by Paul Bradley

They’re telling you:Forget your history, Europeans … envision a future Canada without Whites.’

[The way we were BEFORE mass 3rd-world, non-white immigration: City of Toronto – Yonge St. PHOTOS circa 1970s]

In 1988, multiculturalism in Canada officially became government policy. This was the year the policy became entrenched in our constitution, thereby completing a seventeen year long transition from political ideology to legislated government policy.

Within Canadian society, this is fairly common knowledge. What may be less well known is that on an international scale, constitutionally-based multiculturalism is a rarity. In fact, only two nations in the world have such a policy: Canada and Australia. While many countries promote the concept of diversity, a mere (1%) of the world’s nations are officially multicultural.

At present, Canada has the highest per-capita immigration rates in the world. In conjunction with legislated multiculturalism, the impact upon our nation has been profound — so profound, it is arguable the long-term result will be a complete reinvention of Canadian society.

Multiculturalism and the Shifting Demographic Balance

White man smiling at his own replacement cohorts

For decades, Canadians have been informed by government that multiculturalism is equitable, and beneficial to all. Is this really the case? The answer, one which may surprise a great number of Canadians … is absolutely not.

The reason for this cannot be found simply by reading the statute’s content — though it does contain explicit wording which validates its negative impact — but rather, in the degree to which external circumstances surrounding the policy have changed.

One of the most relevant issues is the manner in which our society has defined the word “minority” — as in one of Canada’s minority communities. In 1988, the definition was relatively straight forward. The reasons for this are simple enough: in terms of overall population  these communities were clearly in the minority.

In this regard, however, things have obviously changed. Decades of large-scaleIMMIGRATION, particularly from Asia and the Middle East, have rendered the traditional meaning of the term irrelevant. Dozens of constituencies in Canada are majority non-white — for example Richmond, B.C., and Brampton, Ontario.

What is the difference between a country like the U.S., who promote “diversity”, and a country such as Canada, which has the official policy? The answer isMONEY — as in monetaryFUNDING — as in the fact that multicultural policy mandates that our tax payer dollars … hundreds of millions of them, be given to ethnic and multicultural organizations to promote their specific culture and identity.

Is this necessarily unfair, or harmful? No, unless a situation were to develop whereby the so-called “minority” becomes the dominant population within the host community. In 2014, this was the case in twenty-six out of Canada’s 308 political ridings. A number of additional ridings will soon find themselves in a similar situation.

Let us consider the ramifications of this new reality. Canadians of European descent are now minorities within these twenty-six ridings — and yet hundreds of millions of dollars are still being funnelled to multicultural organizations to promote their cultural agendas — despite the fact they are no longer minorities at all. On the flip side, the freshly-minted Caucasian-minorities receive nothing. Even more disconcerting, is the fact that when citizens point out the inequality of the present system, the pro-multicultural forces play what is known as the “race card”.

What is this curious phrase all about? In basic terms, playing the race card occurs when multicultural leaders accuse those who question the funding, or any other aspect of multicultural orIMMIGRATION policy, of behaving in a “racist” manner. Lacking a sound, logical rebuttal, they deliver the only tool they have in their arsenal: the race card. Thus far, it has proven to protect their interests successfully. The positive news is, however, the general public are beginning to understand the insidious world of what can most appropriately be called “Multicult” Canada.

The Diversity Industry

Multiculturalist advertisement

To comprehend the full scope of the Multicult’s influence upon our society, we must first realize that the agenda is not served up on a platter for all to understand. It is very much a hidden operation, and not intended for general public understanding. For instance, is the public aware of multiculturalism’s influence within our institutions of higher learning? They certainly should be. Hundreds of millions of dollars are being provided to our largest universities for the purpose of promoting non-democratic political ideology to Canadian-born students. That is, the few of them still walking the halls of University of Toronto, McGill, or University of British Columbia. UBC’s own data tells us the percentage of Canadian-born students on campus is eroding at a rapid pace, largely due to the fact that foreign students pay double, and even triple, the tuition fees of Canadian students.

As with our multicultural organizations, communism on campus is largely paid for by Canadian tax payers. Less commonly understood, is the fact, that a significant portion of the funding comes directly from China’s Ministry of Education. Bottom line? Canadian tax payers, along with the government of China, have paid for the establishment of “Asian Studies” departments throughout our university system. The most conspicuous example is our half-dozen branches of China’s Confucius Institute. There used to be more, however due to accusations that the organization is little more than a propaganda arm of China’s government, a number of universities have formally severed ties with the organization.

Throughout our business community, multiculturalism, or “diversity”, as the banking industry prefers to call it, is trumpeted within the board rooms of all major Canadian corporations. They can dress it up with a fancy word, but they cannot take away the fact that in reality, diversity meansHIRING a person based on their ethnicity, rather than their job qualifications. Even under these circumstances, pro-Multicult leaders and academics continue to bash White Canadians for having the nerve to be better qualified for jobs, or for having a full command of one of our official languages.

Multiculturalism in Canada has long become aMONEY-MAKINGindustry which is eradicating traditional Canadian culture, heritage and identity. Clearly, the situation is serious business. […] [M]ulticultural policy in Canada has led to a situation whereby the Canadian public are funding the demise of their own culture. Over half a billion dollars ($500,000,000) has been taken from tax payers and delivered to a relatively small collection of multicultural organizations, ostensibly for purposes of ethnic “cultural promotion”. At least, promoting their ethnicity is what they used to do. Today, the use of the money goes well beyond promotion, and is presently being utilized to undermine traditional Canadian identity, culture and religion, as well as our official languages.

It all sounds rather ominous. However, upon close inspection of the activities of organizations such as Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada SUCCESSIMMIGRANT SERVICES, Mosaic, and Canada-China Business Council — often in tandem with our real estate or banking industries — a tangible pattern of cultural erosion can be detected.

Growing Dissatisfaction among Disadvantaged Canadians

All the while, Canadians go about their daily business, the majority of whom are simply unaware of the multicultural power game playing out within their nation. There have been, however, some promising signs of change. Several articles which recently appeared in mainstream news (MSM) publications have helped expose the nation of China’s influence upon Canada’s real estate market. In Vancouver, a petition to regulate foreign real estate investment has gathered over 24,000 signatures. Most recently, a public rally took place to protest a growing lack of home affordability. Even Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson, an absolute champion of all-things-China, issued a public statement on the need for “something to be done” to help with home affordability for lower and middle income residents.

In short, Canadians are beginning to push back against enforced multiculturalism andIMMIGRATION — both of which were implemented without public input, or approval. Frankly, it is about time. The fact is, if the status quo is maintained for much longer … traditional Canadian culture, heritage and identity will become fully marginalized, and eventually eliminated.

Multiculturalism in Canada — what was once a policy, is today an industry, and if permitted, this industry will eradicate the very meaning of what it means to be Canadian.  (Some added emphasis by ELN Editor)    >Source
Also read:
Colonizing Canada Continues
Canada’s BLACK Population

What is “Cognitive Dissonance”?

The relevant part of the meaning of the term for us is… “the mental stress or discomfort experienced by an individual who…is confronted by new information that conflicts with existing beliefs, ideas, or values.”

For the purposes of this blog, that would be the theories of race, multiculturalism, and diversity promoted by the mainstream media Vs reality … as seen in real life.

Cognitive dissonance” theory is a key weapon in the promotion of multiculturalism. It was thought up by Jewish psychologist Leon Festinger. It has proved very useful in devising methods to overcome prejudice. Festinger also came up with “proximity theory” – simply that you become friends with whoever is near you. In many ways he is the ideological father of Section 8 housing in the United States.

Most people believe that stress caused by the increasing gap between what people see in the media and what they see in real life … will cause people to wake up. This is a myth.

Experiments in “cognitive dissonance” have shown that in order to escape from the stress, it induces most people to capitulate to multicultural brainwashing and just accept the status quo. Other experiments in “cognitive dissonance” have also shown that a high level of “racism-hatred” of other races – is also useless as a defense against multicultural brainwashing.

So the fact that distrust of the mainstream media (MSM) is at an all-time high is irrelevant. This just means that cognitive dissonance is also at an all time high – and this has always been shown to break peoples’ will to resist. The fact that people are becoming more vocally “racist” is also irrelevant. High levels of “hatred” of other races can be easily overcome.

Experiments have shown that the key thing in neutralizing “cognitive dissonance” and diversity-brainwashing is not distrust of the media or “racism” … but LOVE – love of your own race, the WHITE race.

European children

One study said: “Racism is pro-white… rather than anti-black”. Cognitive Dissonance is ineffective against Love of the White race. That is why the enemy propaganda message was converted from ‘other races are good‘ to ‘the White race is useless‘ (or bad, or is “privileged”). How do we combat it? Here is the flaw in ‘cognitive dissonance’.

The elites don’t care if you’re “racist”. They don’t care if you go online and slander Jews, blacks and Arabs. The don’t care how negative you are towards other races. Because they know from their experiments that no matter how much you “hate” other races … you will be beaten. The elitists don’t fear your so-called “hatred” of other races. So what do they fear?

What they fear is love of your own race – the White race, so “racism” is pro-white and not anti-black.  > Source


Also read:

“Useful Idiots”

State Destruction of the Family Unit

Multiculturalism – A Dividing Force

Is Racial Diversity Good For Canada?


To See The Farm, Is To Leave It


JAPAN Simply Rejects Mass Immigration

JAPAN Prefers Racial Homogeneity

WANTED: More Politicians of this Calibre

AUSTRIA  (Population – 8,440,000)

SWITZERLAND  (Population – 8,055,000)


NORWAY  (Population – 5,075,000)


ESTONIA  (Population – 1,300,000)




AUSTRALIA  (Population – 23,630,000)


 Class photo – Elementary School in SWEDEN today!

Some 3rd-World, NON-white Nations’ Population for comparison:

China – (Population 1,374,000,000) BILLION

India – (Population 1,295,000,000) BILLION

Pakistan – (Population 189,000,000) Million

Bangladesh – Population 163,000,000) Million

Philippines – Population 103,000,000) Million

Nigeria – (Population 180,000,000) Million

Also read:

Our Race Is Dying

SWITZERLAND’S Demographic Decline

Racial Diversity – The CON Game


FRANCE is Falling Fast

Importing Jamaican “Culture”



White People Sent on a Guilt-Trip


To even set up “White privilege” as a category is prima facie racist. It is to reduce the sum of a person, his dignity, his drive, his worth and his soul, to the colour of his skin.

I’ve seen the captious phrase “white privilege” — a camp neologism by my reading — very often lately. It emerges from the intellectual marshes of social justice “educators,” a typical pseudo-concept from that roiling pastiche of academic pursuit.

At [the] base [of] this nonsense asserts that White people come equipped — habited as it were — with all sorts of advantage, opportunities, easy dealing, and in general a faster better reach for the good things of life than human beings less pale.

The phrase has not surprisingly spawned a slogan — after all, what academic discipline doesn’t aspire to the abrupt short-thought of a bumper sticker? — “Check Your Privilege”, which translates into a hectoring from social justice warriors, as they so deliriously style themselves, for White people to stand back and tabulate, with tearful guilt, the infinite advantages that result from their epidermal good luck.


Here in Canada, “White privilege” has been with us for centuries. In my part of the country, Atlantic Canada, the White epidermis has been a pure passport to bliss and favour. For generations Cape Bretoners, for example, have revelled in the advantages that poured on their coal-dusted heads and corrupted lungs from generations of labouring under the earth, stooping with pick and shovel, in the murky, dank, mildewed hell of the coal pits. Privileged? I’ll say. How they lorded it over the folks selling haberdashery in the above-ground stores bathed in sunlight and fresh air. Forty years in a coal mine — if accident or early death had not claimed them — and the world was their grime-coated oyster. What were the odd mine collapses, early deaths, TB, and a lifetime working in darkness and danger compared to the “privileges” that came their way just from being White?

Likewise a lot of the early men and women who fled the Irish Famines — so White and pale from endless hunger they could pass as ghosts. Sure, they left a lot of their families either starving — literally — or past all emaciation and already into the grave. But they came to [Canada’s] East Coast as servants, went off to the holiday of a seal hunt, or chewed a living out of the thin soil and treacherous sea for generations. It was life as one big, “open-air picnic” — diversified by endless corn beef and cabbage dinners, and the beautiful thought that they didn’t ever have to worry about money or goods, because they didn’t have any money and there weren’t any goods.

But they were White — so “privilege” crowned their every hour. Up at 4 a.m. to go to sea for the men, up earlier for the women to light the (wood) stoves, start the breakfast for their masters, and work their fingers to the bone serving their “betters”. A privileged life? You betcha.

WAR was always one of the crowning moments of “White privilege”. The poorest Whites, the least educated, always went to war in the biggest numbers. And there their “privilege” was to crowd in rat- and rain-filled trenches, huddled next to dead comrades, and then to throw themselves “over the top” to face a frenzy of artillery and rifle fire, where loss of life and loss of limb was preordained.
 h/t Incog Man


That such a pseudo-concept even exists, and has full annual academic conferences to elaborate on its tedious fancifulness, and undergraduate courses to inject it into half-formed sensibilities, testifies — one more time — to the modern university’s descent into fatuousness. That any institution which claims to be one of higher learning even allows such trivial exchange … offends the dignity of expression, and purporting to offer “instruction” under its banner is just the latest fulfillment of Alexander Pope’s prophetic alarm: “A little learning is a dangerous thing“.  […]   >to Full Article

…more “White Privileges” experienced in SOUTH AFRICA under their BLACKruled government.

Forced to live on South Africa‘s city streets are Skilled and educated White citizens who are DENIED jobs and welfare.
Read more on this racial discrimination… HERE.

Also read:

Canadian City Abhors White Privileges