ELLIOT LAKE News

Political INcorrect Constructs Arranged To Awaken Slumbering Minds…

Archive for the category “Refugees”

IRISH People Being Dismantled

Population of Nigeria170,000,000 people

Population of Ireland – 4,680,000 people

***************************************************************************************************

Also Read:

IRELAND’S Plummeting Literacy Rate

AFRICAN Violence Comes To Ireland

IRELAND’S Bogus Asylum Seekers

************************************

The Perils of RACIAL DIVERSITY

IRELAND Ripe For “The Taking”

Multi-Racial IRELAND??

**************************

Irish Eyes Are NOT Smiling

First BLACK Mayor in IRELAND?

White Canadians Becoming 2nd-Class Citizens

Christina Blizzard
Toronto Sun Newspaper

Ontario Government Wants to Help “Refugees” — But Not Young (Canadian-born) Girl

TORONTO – Little Madi Vanstone is one beautiful child — with a major health problem.

The 12-year-old has a rare form of Cystic Fibrosis (CF) and requires a life-saving drug, Kalydeco, to keep her breathing. The big problem is the drug costs $348,000 a year — and it’s not covered by OHIP (Ontario Health Insurance Plan).

Madi’s mom, Beth, gave up work when her daughter was diagnosed with CF at eight months of age. “You can’t hold down a job and have a baby in Sick Kids,” Beth told me recently. “We made some lifestyle changes.”

Madi’s dad, Glen, a pipefitter, has insurance benefits that pay for 50% of her drug bill. The drug manufacturer picks up 30% — but that leaves the family paying $5,770 a month to keep their daughter alive. Folks in their small community near Bradford have rallied around Madi.

Local kids walked dogs all summer to raise money. A fund raising gala made $21,000. Celtic tenor John McDermott put on a concert. The local church held a soup kitchen. They did what Canadians have done for generations — pulled together to help a child in need.

[Read: Oldsters Making Me Sick]

That’s what makes Monday’s announcement by the provincial health ministry so galling. This province (Ontario) is trying to shame the feds (Federal Government) into reinstating care for refugee claimants.

Really?

We can’t even afford life-saving drugs for a child who has lived in this province all her life. Whose family has paid taxes for generations. But in a foot-stamping, blame-the-feds act of cynicism, apparently we have enough money to pay for health care for refugee claimants.

View of Toronto skyline from Toronto Harbour. ...

View of Toronto, Ontario

When I came here (from England), I was just glad to be accepted into a country that is full of so much hope and promise. This is the land that was built on the sweat of can-do people who came looking for work — not handouts.

At a time when our health-care system is failing children like Madi … there’s no way we should be expanding coverage for refugee claimants.

Madi is battling a deadly disease. Within 30 days of going on the drug, she was negative for symptoms and her lung capacity had improved 100%. Without the drug, Madi’s lung function was declining. She’d probably need a lung transplant by her mid-teens — and that would only give her another five years. “The thought of having to take her off it … you don’t know how terrifying that is,” Beth said, her voice trailing off. “It’s saving her life — saving her lungs.”

Madi made remarkable progress with the drug. Within 30 days, diagnostic tests for CF were negative as the drug corrects the defect in her body. Her lung function increased from 78% of expected value to 111% of expected value. But the province adamantly won’t pay.

But we do have enough money to pay the very generous Ontario Drug Benefit Plan (O.D.B.P.) for people here as refugee claimants, and those awaiting deportation.

Are we nuts?

In her news release, Health Minister Deb Matthews said she will send the bill to the feds (Canada’s Federal Government in Ottawa). That’s nervy, but out of line. If the feds decide to cut spending, then the province shouldn’t shame them into changing their mind.

Let refugee claimants hold bake sales for their (own) health care… as Madi’s family has done.

In that release, Dr. Phillip Berger, of St. Michael’s Hospital and a member of Canadian Doctors for Refugee Care, said sick children and pregnant women can’t get care, and cancer patients are denied chemotherapy.

If doctors care that much, they can treat refugees for free.

Madi and other patients needing coverage for their care will be at Queen’s Park (in Ontario’s capital city of Toronto) (on) Tuesday making their case.

The argument that “we can’t afford it” no longer holds water — not as long as our government is throwing money at refugee claimants. We can pay for refugee health care when our $13-Billion deficit is erased — and when our $250-Billion accumulated debt has disappeared.

Until then, let them bake cakes.  >Source

(For added emphasis, links and all bolded, underlined, and italicized words by ELN Editor)

[ELN Editor's Note: As reported in the above story, apparently no money is available to help save a young Canadian-born girl in her "hour of need".  However, a Canadian-funded organization is able to come to the immediate rescue of a Toronto-born Somalian "anchor baby" wounded in Africa at a Kenyan shopping mall, and have her transported several thousands of miles to a bed in a Toronto hospital ... AFTER being absent from Canada for 4 years! Try calculating the enormous cost of air-lifting an injured patient out of the dark continent and flying her to Canada for hospital treatment at our expense!

Furthermore, racially-reverse the roles of these two young girls, and be assured the outcome in our new "politically-correct" nation would be entirely different.

In yet another scenario from a few years ago, Canadian taxpayers came to the rescue of some 15,000 "passport Canadians" trapped in war-torn Lebanon -- that cost Canadians almost $100,000,000 -- (that's $100 MILLION) yet the authorities balk at paying a tiny fraction of that amount to save a real Canadian girl ... by the name of Madi Vanstone.]

P.S. The once proud, United States of America, seem to have their own brewing problems.

http://hardons-blog.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/white-americans-are-being-targeted-for.html

Also Read:

Canada’s Immigrants – No Help To Us!

Duped By “Multiculturalism”

Canada’s Black Population

Is Burlington TOO White?

**************************

“Useful Idiots”

Canada’s Misplaced Altruism Cost Billion$

Immigration Watch Canada

CANADA’S “REFUGEE” SYSTEM HAS SHOVELLED BILLION$ TO ABUSERS

From “Abusing Canada’s Generosity and Ignoring Genuine Refugees
Published By Frontier Centre for Public Policy

By James Bissett

It is estimated that roughly 800,000 asylum seekers entered Canada (between 1985 and 2010). [Those numbers of unknown foreigners who were foolishly allowed to enter OUR country without hardly a whimper, EXCEED the entire population of Winnipeg, Manitoba >ELN Editor]

Refugees from Sudan's Darfur Region

In the years 2008 to 2010, over 70,000 claims were registered. This is almost 3,000 per month, and considering there is already a backlog of approximately 60,000 claims before the IRB, it is not alarmist to think that the system is out of control.

( Editor’s Note : IRB (Immigration and Refugee Board), is a group of lay people (not having specialized or professional knowledge of a subject, and even former “refugees” themselves) who determine whether a person is eligible to be given refugee status)

In 2009, Canada became the 3rd largest receiver of asylum seekers (33,000) in the Western world after the United States (49,000) and France (42,000). On a per capita basis, however, we rank number one with one claim for every 1,000 people compared with the United States with one claim per 11,000 people.

In BRITAIN … a bogus “refugee” easily scams his way into the country with unsolicited advice/help by an enabling female border control officer. View this video:

[Amateur foreign actors must play their best performance when ...  Playing The "Refugee" Game]

Perhaps the most insidious feature of Canada’s asylum system has been its enormous financial cost and the naïve presumption that the sums involved are justified because we are, in fact, “helping refugees“.

Unfortunately, it is difficult to determine the actual costs because they are spread over three levels of government—federal, provincial and local — and involve a wide variety of activities such as housing, welfare, legal fees, medical care and, of course, the operational cost of the IRB itself, which (amounted to) just over $117-million in 2010).

The chameleon-like character of asylum seekers also makes it difficult to determine costs. These people undergo a transformation of status after arriving in Canada.

If the IRB refuses their claim, they become a “failed asylum seeker” and are subject to removal pending any appeals submitted.

However, if their claim is accepted, they are given refugee status. Then, as a refugee, they are eligible to apply for permanent residence (PR) status, and if accepted, their status changes (again) to that of “immigrant”. Different costs are involved at each stage of the transformation of status.

[ELN Editor's Note:  Thousands of skilled and qualified European peoples -- at their own expense -- must wait in line for years to have their immigrant documents vetted and approved BEFORE setting foot on Canadian soil to take up residence in our country. Yet, an equal number of un-vetted FOREIGNERS from any 3rd-world hellhole can simply waltz into our country by SELF-PROCLAIMING to be a "refugee". The government large$$e (read: Canadian Taxpayer) then kicks into immediate action to help feed, clothe and shelter these unknown foreigners on the mere strength of uttering that magic password! How gullible can one be??

To add flavour to this absurd scenario, we've adopted another term to describe these liars and cheats who deserve no sympathy from Canadians. We now refer to these bogus "refugees" as Backdoor Uninvited Migrants ... or simply B.U.M.(s).

One additional note -- from a MSM source -- signaling that Canadians are finally waking up to this monumental fraud: Toronto Sun Newspaper]

In 2008, Canada received 37,000 asylum seekers and approximately 60% of these will be refused refugee status by the IRB. Since the government estimates each failed asylum seeker costs $50,000, we can calculate that in 2008 the taxpayers faced a bill of approximately $1.11-billion just to deal with the number of refused cases in the 2008 flow.

Added to the costs are those required to deal with the existing backlog (of 60,000). Even if the costs of the 2008 failed cases are subtracted from the backlog, its numbers have been supplemented by the 33,000 new asylum arrivals in 2009 so the back-log figure of 60,000 would remain at approximately the current level. The costs of dealing with its failure rate of approximately 60 percent would be close to $1.8-billion.

Unfortunately, we are not told if the $50,000 cost figure for (each) failed case is an annual cost, or if it is the total cost involved from refusal of the claimant to eventual removal from Canada. Nor are we informed of the costs of those asylum seekers who are given refugee status by the IRB. The costs do not end when the asylum seeker becomes a “refugee”.

Although it may never be possible to determine the true cost of our asylum system, it is obvious that the current system is terribly expensive and cries out for reform.

(North Korean family try their luck with easy access to our welfare money … read HERE.)

John L. Manion, who was a senior bureaucrat experienced in government financing, a former Deputy Minister of Immigration, Secretary of the Treasury Board, and Associate Clerk of the Privy Council, thought the costs of Canada’s dysfunctional asylum system were in the billions of dollars.

(Editor’s Note:  Manion estimated the cost of the refugee system to be a significant part of the total of $4 Billion ($4,000,000,000) spent per year on immigration and refugee programs.)

[Read: http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/05/17/immigrants-cost-23b-a-year-fraser-institute-report/]

After his retirement, he wrote letters to two immigration ministers, Sergio Marchi and Elinor Caplan, urging them to initiate reform of the system, even if it meant using the notwithstanding clause of the Charter. He did not even get an acknowledgement to his letters.

The Department of Citizenship and Immigration has a lavish grants program that gives money to organizations, agencies and community groups that help immigrants and refugees become settled, and that assist them in finding employment, language training and housing. The money is often channelled through agreements with the provinces or given directly to specific agencies. The allocation for 2010-2011 for Alberta was $60,000,000; British Columbia, $114,000,000; Ontario, $408,000,000; and Quebec, $253,700,000. The remaining provinces and territories received $57.7-million, for a total of $893.4-million. Asylum seekers are the beneficiaries of some of this funding.

[Imagine how those Billion$ of OUR tax dollars could benefit Canadian towns and cities by re-surfacing paved roads, repairing bridges and other needed infrastructure requirements, or building new libraries, or sports facilities for our own people!!  >ELN Editor]

Asylum seekers also receive services from organizations and groups that are given direct financial grants from Citizenship and Immigration. In the period from October 1 to December 31, 2009, almost 200 agencies across Canada received grants of more than $25,000. Sixty of those agencies were awarded contributions in excess of $1-million. For example, the South Asian Family Support Services of Toronto received $13-million, the Settlement and Integration Services of Hamilton received $9-million, and nine Ottawa-area groups received $9.5-million (Disclosure, 2010).

The total allotted for contributions to the settlement program in the Main Estimates for 2010-2011 was $651,749,278.

English: Asylum seekers to Sweden 1984-2007 by...

Asylum seekers to Sweden 1984-2007 by area of origin. Asylsökande till Sverige 1984-2007 efter ursprungsområde

Canadians pay a high price for an asylum system that finds 60% of those assisted to be false refugees. (ELN Editor suggests it’s more likely 98% are bogus refugees.)

It becomes even more scandalous when compared with the cost of other organizations or programs. One can only surmise what an injection of $2 Billion to $3 Billion more would do if directed at improving Canada’s [own] health or educational programs, or reducing the deficit. In a time of alleged austerity and government deficits, it would seem there is no shortage of funding for refugees and immigrants.

Prior to the 1990s, it was expected that the immigrants selected to join the labour force would become established within a year and those sponsored by their relatives in Canada would be looked after by the “sponsoring family” and would not be eligible for government assistance. Even refugees selected from camps abroad were expected to be on their own within a year, and they could expect only minimal financial help during their first year in Canada.

Why is it now assumed that immigrants and “refugees” require massive injections of [our] tax dollars to help them become established in their new country? Could it be that government funding to ethnic and other groups dedicated to helping “refugees” and immigrants is designed more to enlist the political support of these groups than it is to provide help to needy newcomers?

These handouts are not widely publicized by government, and few Canadians are aware of the millions (BILLION$ ??) of dollars devoted to these programs.  >Source

[Daily coverage on the "refugee" game is found at: http://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/

plus a story from the province of Saskatchewan]

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

James Bissett is a former Canadian ambassador with 36 years of service in the government of Canada. He was the Canadian ambassador to Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, and Albania, and the High Commissioner to Trinidad and Tobago. From 1985 to 1990, he was the executive director of the Canadian Immigration Service.

********************************************************************************

Also Read:

Canadian Border Madness

More “Refugees” To Support

CANADA – “Refugees” Paradise

Canadian Generosity Vs Stupidity

**********************************

AUSTRALIA – The Unlucky Country

Canada’s “Poverty-Import” Business

By PaxCanadiana

English: A Canadian Customs and Immigration se...

Canada’s well-indoctrinated journalists always fail to connect increasing poverty rates with Canada’s mass immigration numbers, even though there is much evidence to connect the two. That’s because their brains have been programed not to. That’s why they are working journalists.

Canadian newspapers are, first and foremost, profit maximizing businesses overseen by a board of directors that pays close attention to stock quotes. And a newspaper’s audience base is it’s prime revenue generator because it is these figures, coupled with circulation numbers, that a daily (newspaper) uses to set prices to charge to potential advertisers.

Mass immigration increases population numbers, and thus, is a source of potential growth for Canada’s journals of record. That’s why they are almost all pro-mass immigration and rarely offer dissenting views that have the potential to influence public opinion and policy makers that will result in lower immigration numbers.

No journalist critical of mass immigration will get his or her work regularly published, let alone get hired in any of Canada’s newspapers because opinions supporting the reduction of immigration numbers is an attack on profits. That’s why in this Toronto Star article no mention is made of how mass immigration may be contributing to the growing income gap.

Income gap growing wider

Canada lags behind 17 developed countries; has no detailed plan to fight poverty, study finds:
Oct 21, 2008 04:30 AM
Laurie Monsebraaten
Social Justice Reporter

Poverty and inequality rates in Canada have been on the rise since 1995 and are now higher than the average developed nation, according to a new study.

The income gap is growing throughout the developed world, but the gap between rich and poor in Canada widened more dramatically than in most countries between 1995 and 2005, according to the report released in Paris today“.

The above is made all the more clearer when mass immigration is taken into account. Over the past twenty years Canadian immigration policy has shifted away from meeting Canada’s real economic needs, and more to a humanitarian program where more unskilled immigrants enter the country, than do skilled immigrants.

Canadian immigration policy is effectively divorced from economic necessity where downturns in the economy no longer compel governments to lower immigration targets. It was in the late 1980s (1988, I believe) when the Progressive Conservative government upped the immigration levels by 100,000 a year.

It was also in the 1980s (1985, I believe) when the Singh decision was made granting Charter protection to anyone on Canadian soil prompting a flood of economic migrants to Canada’s shores to pose as bogus refugees, and abuse our asylum system.

Being flooded with waves of superfluous people imported to fill vacancies in low wage, part-time and temporary jobs, effectively attacking any gains made by the labour movement for fair pay and pay equity, then it should be no surprise to learn that poverty and inequality rates have been on the increase since 1995.

Romania, Germany, Canada, Hungary

And now, Canadian rates are higher than the average industrial nation. This too is no surprise. Canada has the highest immigration in-take in the world doling out citizenship the way (candy) treats are given away on Halloween.

[How much money does this "candy" cost Canadian Taxpayers, you ask? Your answer can be found here: http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/05/17/immigrants-cost-23b-a-year-fraser-institute-report/]

If we include temporary foreign workers and illegal immigrants (which includes failed refugees and those who have no intention of leaving after their visa expires) … then it is likely Canada is taking in between 350,000 to 400,000 people a year.

Report Illegal Immigrants]

After 20 years (now 25 years) of continuous decline, both inequality and poverty rates (in Canada) have increased rapidly in the past 10 years, now reaching levels above the OECD average,” says the report.

As in other countries, more single-parent households, and people living alone are contributing to income inequality in Canada.

And wages for the rich are increasing, while they have been stagnating or dropping for middle and lower income workers, the report says.

Most affected have been young adults and families with children.

Canada spends less on cash transfers — such as unemployment and family benefits — than other OECD countries and that may be one of the reasons the country fares worse than others, the report suggests.

The report echoes concerns raised by Canadian social research groups about growing income disparity in Canada at a time of strong economic growth.

English: A portrait of Noam Chomsky that I too...

Noam Chomsky in Vancouver, Canada.

What do I mean by “importing the third world model“? It is something I have borrowed from American lefty-dissident Noam Chomsky, and applied it to Canada. What it means is that advanced industrialized countries such as the United States and Canada are adopting the characteristics familiar with third-world countries and their economies.

One key characteristic of the third-world model is the high amount of foreign ownership of a third-world economy. Here Canada can consider itself an honorary member as our country’s economy is the most foreign-owned of all the G8 nations.

The other key characteristic is great wealth disparity, and it seems Canada is on track to satisfy this one as well. It is more than accepted now that the rich are getting richer, and the poor are getting poorer in this country. The attack on the middle-class is happening on several fronts and one of the key weapons is mass immigration.

It makes no sense to be importing people into Canada’s economy when all that awaits them are insecure jobs and poverty wages. It makes no sense to import people who flood labour markets and hinder, or reverse wage and salary gains. It makes no sense to keep immigration levels high when poverty rates and inequality rates have been consistently increasing for the past ten years. It makes no sense to keep immigration levels high when the economic outlook is gloomy.

English: Demonstration against the expulsion o...

Demonstration against the expulsion of immigrants from Israel, 2009

Such a study by the OECD should stop one to think about the situation and look to see what are its causes so the problem can be rectified. One of the major causes for Canada’s poor performance is because of mass immigration. A chart accompanied the print edition of this piece and all the major immigration receiving nations (the U.K., the U.S., Australia, New Zealand, and Canada) fared relatively poorly. We are importing poverty.

If poverty-activists are serious they should pressure the government to reduce immigration targets because large immigration levels hurt the most economically vulnerable of Canadians. Wages can be kept low, illegals can be exploited, and immigrants lured here on lies and materialistic fantasies of excess, often find themselves in desperate situations when the harsh reality of Canada’s labour market forces them to take any job just to survive.

If Canada maintains its high intake of immigrants despite the warning signs suggesting that the numbers are too many … then poverty rates will barely change and most likely keep increasing. Reducing immigration numbers is one of the issues we must address … if we wish to get serious about poverty. >Source

(Underlined, bolded and italicized words are by ELN Editor for added emphasis.)

Roy Beck reveals the disastrous results of allowing for (mostly unabated 3rd world) immigration into the United States in 1999, and still … NOTHING has changed!

Also Read:

WAKE UP, Canada

Labour Shortage MYTH

Immigrants Need Not Apply

Immigrant Workers NOT Needed

Immigrants – ZERO Affect On Economy

************************************

Canadian Border Madness

Lying, Cheating “Refugees”

Canada’s Broken “Refugee” System

From: Immigration Watch Canada

Canada’s Refugee System Remains in Disarray

By James Bissett
From “Abusing Canada’s Generosity and Ignoring Genuine Refugees”
Published by Frontier Centre for Public Policy

Canada

Canada’s Parliament Building in OTTAWA

Unlike other countries, Canada allows almost unlimited access (to its refugee system).

Canada is one of the few countries that permits anyone from any country to claim asylum, and apply for “refugee” status.

(Editor’s Note 1 : Between 1985 and 2010, over 800,000 people made claims to obtain refugee status in Canada. Around 60% of the 800,000 have proved to be fraudulent. The objective of most of the 800,000 people has been to:

(1) gain refugee status, (2) get immigrant status and (3) bring others here. This is why, for many years, critics have stated that Canada’s refugee system has become an alternate immigration system.)

(Editor’s Note 2 : In addition, every year, Canada’s Immigration Department and private organizations such as churches go to refugee camps abroad, and re-settle about 10,000 people in Canada.)

[For our American readers, see daily updates at: Refugee Settlement Watch

... also read: The Refugee Racket]

European Union countries, long ago, introduced pre-screening processes to sort out frivolous and clearly false claims from genuine ones, and they have accelerated procedures for dealing with claimants originating from countries considered safe for refugees. Many countries have reduced welfare benefits and other services to asylum seekers ; others do not permit asylum seekers to work. These methods have been implemented so that fraudulent claimants who are illegal immigrants do not overwhelm their asylum systems.

fields a question from a community member at t...

Jason Kenney

(Editor’s Note 3 : Recently, former Immigration Minister Jason Kenney helped to correct the problem of people coming from Safe countries and abusing our system. He established a list of Safe countries from which claims will not be accepted.)

Under Canada’s system, there is no effective pre-screening procedure to separate the obviously unfounded claims from those that are genuine. As a result, all who submit a claim receive a quasi-judicial hearing before the IRB to determine if they are to receive refugee status. In most cases, the claimant also receives free legal assistance when appearing before the IRB (Immigration and Refugee Board).

Refugees from Sudan's Darfur Region

Sudanese “Refugee” on the road from rags to welfare riches to any gullible White country who believes his sob story. Canada, you say? Here I come!

The problem is that although the IRB finds that almost 60 per cent of the claims are false, there are so many claimants, (that) it can take two years or more for a claim to be heard. In the meantime, the claimant is entitled to (free) welfare, free medical care and other services, as well as having permission to work in Canada.

[See: More "Refugees" To Support]

Moreover, if the IRB decides the claimant is not a genuine refugee, there is a series of appeals and reviews available to determine if there are humanitarian or compassionate reasons why the person should be allowed to remain. In addition, no one can be removed if there is an indication that if the person is sent home, he or she might face torture or death. The longer the claimant remains in the country, the better the chances are that there will be no removal. Time is on the side of the claimant. Prolongation of the time in Canada means that the authorities are either unable or unwilling to follow through with the unpleasant, expensive and time-consuming deportation process.

As a result, thousands of failed claimants are able to stay, and this adds to the attractiveness that Canada has for others (bogus refugees) who wish to use the asylum route to gain entry. The name of the game is to gain entry to the country; for the vast majority of claimants, whether their refugee claim is eventually successful or not is irrelevant. They will get to stay.

On average, it takes 4.5 years from the submission of a claim until a person who is found not to be a refugee is removed; in some cases, it takes 10 years or more. More often than not, the individual either disappears, or is eventually allowed to remain in Canada. The Auditor-General’s report of 2007 pointed out that there were 42,000 warrants for the arrests of failed asylum seekers whose whereabouts were unknown and another 15,000 with addresses presumably listed with the authorities (Auditor-General, 2008).

[See: Report ILLEGAL Immigrants]

The forced removal of failed asylum seekers is a difficult and expensive exercise, frequently fraught with emotional distress and bad publicity when the media or church groups that offer sanctuary champion individual cases. Large numbers of asylum seekers arrive with false documents or without any, so it is difficult to know where to send them when the time comes for their removal. Often it is impossible to obtain travel documents from the individual’s own country.

Removal costs range between $1,500 and $15,000 per removal, but some cases can cost up to $300,000. The new Bill introduced by the Immigration Minister, Jason Kenney, estimates a cost of $540.7-million over five years for the removal of failed asylum seekers. This could be reduced considerably if — upon arrival, –there were a fast-screening system that would prevent obviously false claims from proceeding. Unless removal can be carried out within 48 hours, the chances of successful removal become problematic (Citizenship and Immigration, 2010).

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

James Bissett is a former Canadian ambassador with 36 years of service in the government of Canada. He was the Canadian ambassador to Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, and Albania, and the High Commissioner to Trinidad and Tobago. From 1985 to 1990, he was the executive director of the Canadian Immigration Service.   >SOURCE

Also Read:

Canadian Border Madness

Canada’s Immigrants NO Help To Us

Grim Job Prospects for Canada’s Youth

By PaxCanadiana

Français : icône pour articles sur le cananda

If Canada’s Youth Want A Future, They Need To Be ‘Red Pilled’* On IMMIGRATION.

From the “when a better life for you means a worse life for usfiles.

The Huffington Post reports:

 “Hovering around 16.9 per cent in 2012, Ontario’s youth jobless rate ‘rivaled that of Michigan’s, and was higher than Indiana, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin,’ said the CCPA.

Supposedly, economically-weaker Quebec had a far lower youth jobless rate in 2012 — 13.7 per cent, the report found. {…}

The difference in unemployment rates between youth and adults in the province is the largest it’s ever been, the report found. {…} Perhaps surprisingly, Toronto comes off particularly badly in the report. The percentage of youth with a job in Canada’s largest city is 43.5% … the lowest of any region in the province. Toronto also has the largest gap between youth and adult employment rates, at 21.8 per cent, the report found.

View of Toronto skyline from Toronto Harbour. ...

Toronto, Canada.

“Toronto’s low employment rate comes from the withdrawal of 15–24 year olds from the labour force,” the report concludes.

The CCPA offers two possible reasons for why Ontario now has the worst youth job climate of any province outside the Maritimes: The “national economic shift away from manufacturing towards resource extraction,” and post-recession government austerity measures.”

A third reason needs to be added:  Mass Immigration.

It’s astounding the report didn’t take this into account, but the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is a left-of-center think-tank and are willfully ignorant to the adverse effects of Canada’s mass immigration policy. In any case here’s the CCPA report.

So here we are. Three decades (30 years!) of unrestrained mass immigration that was allegedly needed to … “keep the economy going, businesses running and Canadians employed” … has (only) helped contribute to an alarmingly high youth unemployment rate in the nation’s most populace province, as well as it’s largest city.

[What item costs Canadian taxpayers $23,000,000,000 (Billion) every year?  ANSWER]

Guess we didn’t see that coming did we? 

How could have we, when we (Canadians) are constantly blinded by the assumed benefits of shoveling hordes of the world’s masses into the labour supply. And the fact, that Ontario and it’s capital city, Toronto – the largest city in Canada, and fourth largest in North America – receives the lion’s share of immigrants … probably has nothing to do with it.

But just think of all the great ethnic restaurants they open. Too bad you don’t have a job, or one with a future that pays a living wage, otherwise you might be able to afford to eat at one once in a while.

This report brings into sharp relief the need to abandon all faith in the purported prophetic powers of labour-market analysts and economists when setting immigration targets; the self proclaimed “experts.”

When they were foretelling the decline in labour-market supply due to Canada’s low birth rate and retiring baby-boomer cohort, the remedy prescribed was increased immigration-quotas to stave off the crash and keep the economy going. If we didn’t do it the sky was going to fall.

Now, it’s 2013 and those jobs either disappeared or moved overseas to the (same 3rd world) countries we are importing immigrants from, and the baby-boomers (born from 1946 to 1964) aren’t retiring as quickly as expected. So … have immigration targets declined to reflect this unforeseen reality? Not in the least. They have, in fact, increased.

Immigrants are not a source of job growth. They grow labour supply. Investment from the public and private sectors are sources of job growth, and when activity from both do not keep up to satisfy the growth in immigrant driven labour supply, don’t act shocked when you get high youth unemployment. And, the decline in investment by Canadian businesses in their workforce by some 40% since 1993 … doesn’t help much either.

The levels of irony here are rich. A major reason immigrants move to Canada is not necessarily for a better life for themselves – many having to toil just over the poverty line in jobs below their skills-set – but for their kids, and to provide for them a future their homeland couldn’t deliver.

It’s not far-fetched to assume that many of those youth affected by the high youth unemployment numbers are the “first generation” Canadian born children of immigrants. The system their immigrant parents sought to benefit from … is now working to the disadvantage of their children.

(Something for our American readers to ponder on … read HERE.)

While the importation of their immigrant parents may have displaced Canadians from the workforce, now immigrants are displacing the Canadian-born children of immigrants. In karmic fashion it’s the system feeding on itself and illustrating why immigrants have a vested interest in seeing immigration quotas reduced.

Another level of irony is that the age bracket of the unemployment figures – ages 15 to 24 – tend to be the most supportive of Canada’s immigration system.

No surprises here as these are the years one is most indoctrinated to the imposed “feel good“, multicult propaganda taught in the public education system. They are rarely exposed to contrarian views, but hopefully to finding a job, choosing a place to live, and living in the real world will wake them up.

Of course, immigration isn’t solely to blame. There are other factors at work that collectively contribute to unemployment figures. But immigration isn’t helping things. It’s making things difficult, if not worse, for Canada’s rising generation, and we need to see to it that they have an inheritance in the land of their birth.

We don’t work and save so that our neighbour’s children have a future at the expense of our own. That’s dysfunctional. On their part, Canada’s youth need to take the red pill* on immigration matters. It’s not “racist” to demand decreases in immigration quotas. A better life for immigrants should not be built on a worse life for us.   >http://CanadianImmigrationReform.blogspot.ca/

(Bolded, underlined words and video links are added for emphasis by ELN Editor.)

*Editor’s Note: The term “red pill” and its opposite the “blue pill” are pop culture terms that became common symbols for the choice of remaining in the blissful ignorance of illusion (blue), or acknowledging the sometimes, painful truth of reality (red).

Also Read:

Importing Black Crime

Importing Jamaican “Culture”

***************************

Canada’s BLACK Population

***************************

“Temporary” Foreign Workers vs Canadians

Canada’s IMMIGRANTS – No Help To Us!

**********************************

Labour Shortage MYTH

Immigrants Need Not Apply

Immigrant Workers NOT Needed

Immigrants – ZERO Affect On Economy

*********************************

Canada / US to share information on bogus “refugee” claims…

Related articles

Multi-Racial Immigration

Back in July 2005, Professor Andrew Fraser received national attention in Australia with a letter to his local newspaper — signed with his academic title — in which he claimed that importing Sudanese refugees threatened to turn Australia into “a colony of the Third World” and stated: “Experience everywhere in the world shows us that an expanding BLACK population is a sure-fire recipe for increases in crime, violence and other social problems“.[2][3][4]

(Read: Australia Meets With BLACK Crime

…and the “beat” goes on.

Importing Black Violence)

English: Macquarie University sign

Macquarie University responded by distancing itself from Professor Fraser’s remarks, but supported his right to say what he wished in a responsible way. The acting Vice-Chancellor, Professor John Loxton, stated there was no place for “racism” at the university, but it “recognises and protects academic freedom as essential to the conduct of teaching, research and scholarship“.

Fraser was accused of being affiliated with White “Supremacist” groups, including the Patriotic Youth League (PYL), by the anti-racist group FightDemBack. Although both he and the PYL initially denied any connection, Fraser admitted he had attended PYL meetings and signed up to the PYL website after video footage of a PYL member describing him as an official legal adviser surfaced.[5]

(Read: African Refugees “Enriching” Australia)

Following an outcry from Sydney’s Sudanese community, Macquarie University Vice-Chancellor Dianne Yerbury on July 29, 2005 decided to suspend Fraser from teaching any further at the campus on the grounds that the race debate was “threatening to spill over into the classroom” and was “affecting the university’s ability to operate effectively.” [6] Macquarie University offered to pay out the final year of his contract, but Fraser declined, describing the offer as a “dishonorable discharge“.[7]

On this incident, Fraser wrote:

“Truth is no longer a defence when it comes to charges of academic deviance. Instead of an invitation to debate the issues, the Vice-Chancellor’s office sought to get me off campus as soon as possible by offering to buy out my contract. The head of Human Resources made it clear to me that my public comments were damaging their efforts to market Macquarie University to foreign students. When I refused the offer on the grounds that it amounted to a dishonourable discharge, VC Di Yerbury, ordered that I be suspended from teaching. This was justified on the specious grounds that the safety of students supposedly ‘had been threatened by’, among others, my supporters! For what must be the first time in academic history, alleged threats by outsiders to disrupt classes were met, not by tightening security to deal with the disrupters, but by getting rid of the disruptee”.[8]

In August 2005, more than 300 Macquarie University staff and students attended a forum on “racism” and free speech, at which Fraser (as well as the Sudanese community, and university members) was allowed to put his views from the floor.[9]

Fraser’s suspension ended in mid-2006, when an early-retirement package took effect.

In September 2005, Professor Fraser wrote an article advocating a return of the White Australia Policy, entitled “Rethinking the White Australia Policy“. The article was set to be published in the law journal of Deakin University, but the University directed the journal not to publish it.[10] “Rethinking the White Australia Policy” has since been published and circulated across the internet.[11]

In the controversial article, Fraser wrote:

“Given the relentless and revolutionary assault on their historic national identity, White Australians now face a life-or-death struggle to preserve their homeland. Whether effective resistance to their displacement and dispossession can be mounted … is another question. Unlike other racial, ethnic or religious groups well-equipped to practice the politics of identity, White Australians lack a strong, cohesive sense of ethnic solidarity. As a consequence, ordinary Australians favouring a moratorium on NON-white immigration cannot count on effective leadership or support, from their co-ethnics among political, intellectual and corporate elites. On the contrary, our still predominantly Anglo-Australian rulers are indifferent; some profit from, and others actually take pride in their active collaboration with the 3rd-World colonization of Australia. None of the major parties, indeed, not one member of the Commonwealth Parliament, offers citizens the option of voting to defend and nurture Australia’s Anglo-European identity. The problem, in short, is clear: The Australian nation is bereft of a responsible ruling class”.[12]

In December 2005, Fraser further criticised multiracialism in Australia by writing an article regarding the 2005 Cronulla riots, entitled “Diversity vs. Freedom: Australians Fight On The Beaches.”[13] As with the full version of “Rethinking the White Australia Policy“, the article was only published on the internet, namely on the US-based webzine VDARE.

A complaint from the Sydney’s Sudanese community about the original newspaper letter was upheld on 31 March 2006 by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, on whose direction Fraser reluctantly apologised for his remarks.[14][15]

Andrew Fraser addressed the American Renaissance Conference in February 2006, alongside speakers such as Nick Griffin of the British National Party and Professor J. Philippe Rushton. This was followed up later in the year with appearances at the Inverell political forum in March, and at the Sydney Forum in August alongside speakers who included Jim Saleam of the Australia First Party.

In an article for Alternative Right entitled “The Cult of “The Other“”, Professor Fraser warned that academic freedom was being stifled in Australian universities. He wrote:

“Academic freedom in Australia is dying before our eyes; another sacrifice performed in the now holy name of “The Other.” In the universities, as elsewhere, public criticism of privileged minorities must walk a shaky legal tightrope, unfortunately, in a mass-mediated wasteland of intellectual cowardice and political conformity, Australian universities are not an oasis of dissent. If my experience as a teacher, scholar, and, more recently, a first-year theology student is a reliable guide, academia is utterly hostile to free thought and frank discussion on race, ethnicity, and gender“.[16]  >Source

Also Read:

Mob Violence In America

Black Violence Comes To IRELAND

****************************

None Dare Say WHITE GENOCIDE

50 Million Africans INVITED To Europe

**********************************

Diversity Is A Fraud

Racial Diversity – A CON Game

Multiculturalism – A Dividing Force

*****************************

Democracy and Our Flaws

SWEDEN Destroying Itself

Sweden, on Tuesday, became the first European Union country to announce it will give asylum to all Syrian refugees who apply.

“All Syrian asylum seekers who apply for asylum in Sweden will get it,” Annie Hoernblad, the spokeswoman for Sweden’s migration agency, told AFP.

“The agency made this decision now because it believes the violence in Syria will not end in the near future.”

The decision, which will give refugees permanent resident status, is valid until further notice, added Hoernblad. Until now, Sweden could only house refugees temporarily for three years, after each individual case was evaluated by the state. The agency expects that the “vast majority of Syrian nationals who today have provisional status will apply for permanent status,” said Hoernblad.

Those granted permanent status will also be allowed to bring their families to Sweden.

[Editor's Note:  Not just Sweden ... but all of Europe is targeted for genocidal destruction. See ... 50 Million BLACKS Invited To EUROPE

(SUOMESSAFINLAND Headed Towards Destruction]

From the Council of Conservative Citizens

Council of Conservative Citizens

The extreme, far-left Swedish Socialist regime, took unprecedented action that can only be described as the planned eradication of the Swedish [people] as a unique ethnic phenotype. The Swedish government is offering blanket asylum to any, and all citizens of the nation of Syria.

SWEDEN has a population that is less than 10 million people, of which less than 8 million are Swedes. Now, they have invited a nation of nearly 21 million Arabs to move to their country.

English: Sunni Muslim man wearing traditional ...

Sunni Muslim man wearing traditional dress and headgear

That means Sweden is offering asylum to almost three (3) Arabs for every one (1) of it’s own native Swedes. This action potentially places the Swedish people in a position similar to the American Indians just before waves of Europeans began arriving [in North America].

The nation (Syria) being offered blanket asylum, is roughly 75% Sunni Islam. Sweden is already experiencing massive amounts of violence and crime at the hands of the Sunni Muslim who have already moved there.

Recently, Sunni Muslims rioted for a week straight in the Swedish capital [Stockholm] and attacked native Swedes at random. Many Sunni Muslims will go to Sweden and apply for amnesty, specifically, so they can engage in violent jihad in Europe.

[For added emphasis, all underlined, bolded words by ELN Editor)

Also Read:

Sweden – Tops in Rapes

Has Sweden Gone Insane?

Sweden’s Racial Suicide Mission

Swedes Surrender To Muslim Invaders

*******************************

Can Sweden Survive Multi-Racialism?

Australia – “Refugees” Paradise

From Ozzie Saffa

AUSTRALIA: The difference between an aged (Australian) pensioner and an illegal immigrant/refugee 

Flag of Australia

The poor ‘refugees’ – “they are only fleeing for their lives“.

Over and over the bleeding hearts here in Australia – especially Labor, the commie Greens and the “refugee” advocates and lawyersall try and guilt the Australian public into just allowing these people to stream into the country unchecked.

Most come from Muslim countries or from African hell-holes. All bypassing “safe” Muslim countries, or other safe countries closest to them to make their way to Indonesia – usually by paying for a ticket to fly there – and once there, they pay thousands of $$ for a place on a boat, and then set sail for Australia. And en route, they toss their passports overboard so that Australia can’t see who they are, where they come from, how old they are, and who is related to who.

Australia – their new country of milk and lots of free honey.

And the Labor Rudd government just waves them in. Over 90% are found to be genuine refugees, a joke of massive proportions.

And once they are resettled in Australia, they get free money for life. And this free money comes from the Australian people who work and pay their taxes – the very people who gets hounded by the tax office if they don’t pay their taxes on time and as owed.

And in return, the Muslims and Africans mostly refuse to assimilate.

No, they head for their nearest Muslim/African stronghold where they are free to live as they did back in their homelands – which they “fled”.

No need to learn English. No need to follow Australian laws. No need to embrace their new country. Nah, nothing’s expected of them – but everything is expected from the Australian people to accommodate their new invaders.

It’s a happy one-way street for the “refugees – the world revolves around them.  Anything to make them happy, comfortable and at home.

John Howard in Coffs Harbour, NSW Australia in...

John Howard March 2006.

So far, over 45 000 (“refugees”) have come in under Rudd/Gillard since 2008, after previous PM John Howard has all but closed the boat business.

Over 1000 have drowned, but the Left, including the Greens and the lawyers, are only too happy to look the other way just as long as the ‘refugees’ are treated compassionately and continued to be welcomed into Australia. Anyone not following their lead are labelled “racist”, “xenophobic” and “red-necks”. The moral superiority belongs to the Left. Everyone else is wrong.

So, if you are in any doubt as to why these “refugees” choose to travel thousands of miles to come to Australia … then here is the main reason.

Have a look at [this] image [...] and notice how much an Australian tax-paying citizen who is a pensioner receives as a government pension, compared to those people who come into our country uninvited, illegally and having paid NOTHING into the tax pot.


…and, more proof, yet AGAIN.

If this isn’t a hostile act against the legal residents of Australia … then what is?  >Source

(For added emphasis, bolded and underlined words are by ELN Editor)

Also Read:

Australia Meets With Black Crime

Australia’s Silent Invasion

*********************

ESTONIANS Don’t Want Black People

ITALIAN Town Ejects African Migrants

Switzerland’s Demographic Decline


SWITZERLAND has NOT escaped the invading features of 3rd World peoples.

*********************************************************

Is this “Why”?

Also Read:

FRANCE is Falling Fast

How to Colonize BRITAIN

Importing Jamaican “Culture”

ENGLAND – From Titan to Defeatism

*******************************

Perils of Racial Diversity

“A Racial Program for the 20th Century”

Post Navigation

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 94 other followers

%d bloggers like this: