By Martin Collacott,
H/T to Immigration Watch Canada
Recent reports on the abuse suffered by live-in caregivers from overseas, and in particular the case of Leticia Sarmiento, underline the need to protect the rights and ensure decent working conditions for such workers.
The live-in caregiver program itself, however, also requires a thorough review and overhaul in view of the questionable premises on which it is based.
[Read: Sikh Men Seek Nanny Jobs]
Live-in caregivers are the only “temporary” foreign workers who are virtually guaranteed permanent residence in Canada … if they can stick it out for two (2) years in the jobs for which they are hired.
In effect, the program ensures that the caregiver will be able to stay here permanently, and bring in their family members without having to meet the usual requirements for those coming here as members of the economic class.
Who benefits from this arrangement, and who do not?
While the caregivers may have to work long hours at low pay – and some employers are obviously better than others in this regard – they are usually prepared to do almost any of the work demanded of them in order to gain permanent status without having the qualifications normally required.
Their employers are also happy with the arrangement since the prospect of being granted permanent residence (P.R.) here spurs on the caregivers to put in long hours at low pay when necessary.
Who does not benefit? The answer to this is … Canadians, in general.
While the program is popular with a limited number of households – in many cases upscale working couples with young children (or wealthy immigrants, themselves), who can afford to bring in help from overseas – it is quite likely to be costly to Canadian taxpayers since the latter have to pay for the social services and other benefits accruing to caregivers and their families … after they get permanent status.
And since they did not have to meet the requirements of economic immigrants, there is a good chance their earnings will be low enough that the benefits they receive from the public purse … will be greater than what they pay in taxes. As one government document wryly noted, the economic benefits (for Canada) are “marginal.”
[It’s much, much worse than “marginal”… simply read this report. >Editor]
In the circumstances, the program has been increasingly popular, with a seven-fold (700%) increase in the number of “caregivers”, who along with their family members, have in recent years been able to use it to obtain permanent status in Canada. They increased from just under 2,000 in 2002 to nearly 14,000 in 2010 … with another 29,000 awaiting processing of their applications in that year.
[Imagine what those high numbers must be in 2014! The “word” has now spread to every 3rd-world economic basket-case that Canada’s back-door is left wide open to unskilled, illiterate non-white foreigners. Meanwhile, educated and skilled P.R. applicants and their families from Britain and other 1st world nations are waiting up to 4 or 5 years to gain entry through Canada’s front door?! >Editor]
Apart from the cost of the program to Canadian taxpayers, other serious problems have been identified. According to internal government documents obtained through access to information requests, two of the immigration offices where many of the applications are made – Manila (the Philippines) and Chandigarh (India) – have seen a major proliferation of local caregiver “schools” that exist, either in name only, or have questionable standards. Many appear to have been created solely for the purpose of men – which is odd in societies where care-giving is seen as “women’s work”.
[Obviously, these overseas foreigners are only scamming a system that’s only asking to be abused. It’s the only option left open to unqualified foreigners living half way around the world who seek every possible loophole to land on Canadian soil.
When free tickets to Canada’s social welfare net are offered up without hardly a whimper of protest, only fools would not take advantage of such generous offers, hence we attract foreign schemers from 3rd-world countries who are only eager to take advantage of this giant loophole.
Canada has a population of 35 million people and suffers from a real unemployment rate of about 12% to 15%, yet we need(?) to import hundreds of thousands of “temporary” foreign workers, care-giver workers, plus the never-ending 5,000 legal immigrants arriving EVERY WEEK for the past 24 years!? Something is WRONG with this picture. >Editor]
Yet, another problem noted by Ottawa is that between 40% and 70% of the “caregivers” come to work for (their own) family members already ensconced in Canada, which means, in effect, that it functions to a large extent, as a back-door family reunification program. This is underlined by the fact that many caregivers apparently leave the “profession” once they obtain permanent status [in Canada].
This, in turn, raises questions as to whether the program is really meeting an ongoing labour-market need or simply functioning as a means of immigration to Canada by individuals who wouldn’t otherwise qualify. The fact that there are sufficient (numbers of) Canadian caregivers willing and able to meet the demand for live-out home care, also raises doubts about the extent to which the program is needed.
All things considered, the live-in caregivers program should be strictly a temporary-worker program, and not a channel to permanent residence. It makes no sense to allow people to (remain in Canada) permanently and have their families join them when they cannot meet normal immigration requirements.
The abused, battered and dumbed-downed Canadian passport.
[During the 1950s and 1960s when a Canadian passport held exceptional value, European immigrants were expected to meet with high standards before being allowed into Canada.
Today, our country’s debased entry standards have become a joke around the world, leading us away from much higher living standards enjoyed by those of the 1960s. >Editor]
By the same token, it is important that the government put in place explicit standards and guidelines to ensure that live-in caregivers receive reasonable treatment from their employers in Canada and that they have clear recourse in the event they do not.
Martin Collacott, a former Canadian ambassador who lives in Vancouver, is a spokesman for the Centre for Immigration Policy Reform.
Sikh Men Seek Nanny Jobs
Canada’s “Nanny” Loophole
“Temporary” Foreign Workers
Racial Diversity – A CON Game