STILL ACTIVE, so Click centre BEFORE This Video is removed.
Subscribe to: Ruination Media Ruination Media
Lady LaSSarus is a traditionalist, wife and aspiring mother from the deep mountain South who wishes to unite the ladies of the Traditionalist/Alt-Right movement. She is opposed to feminism, Cultural Marxism, and Critical Theory.
Lady LaSSarus joins us for a discussion about feminism, women’s matters, and the Alt-Right. We begin with a look into her awakening to the cultural Marxist slant on race issues in the U.S., which was brought to light through working with Chicago’s south side public school system.
Lady LaSSarus gives her views on (Donald) Trump and the great traction he is receiving as Americans fed up with the crumbling economy and degradation caused by never-ending 3rd world immigration … are finally taking a stand. We look at some liberal misconceptions about the viability of multiculturalism and upholding European ideals that are centered on homogeneous, high-trust societies.
We also touch on the growing movement of women in the Alt-Right scene and how we can bring more traditionalist-minded females into the fold. We consider how sly feminist programming has created several generations of misguided mothers who have naïvely subjected their daughters to anti-woman and anti-White conditioning, and we delve into ways to re-establish the natural balance of male/female relationships and inspire true veneration of motherhood.
Lady LaSSarus shares the steps she has taken to get back to a more Eurocentric way of life and gives inspiring examples of this budding trend. At the end, we lay out some guidelines for connecting with like-minded individuals and tips for men to attract a great Alt-Right soul mate. >>LISTEN HERE
Relevant Links Twitter Lady LaSSarus
18 yr. old Canadian girl GETS IT !
“One thing that I have found is [when] speaking with people around me, it seems that this battle for the minds of people and our chances to wake them up are almost fruitless. Honestly, I have tried again and again to reach out and try to get people to wake the hell up [to] see what is honestly happening in our sick world … only to get the usual blank stares and wild-eyed looks.
Former Communist (USSR) KGB Agent, Yuri Bezmenov in 1984
Many people, as usual, just do not want to hear about the reality of our world, and many just look at me and say flat out “I don’t want to talk about it“.
It does make me feel exasperated at times, and gives me the impression that we are fighting a losing battle simply because the brainwashing of the public’s minds through the Jew spew media, and the poisons in our diets … is just too much to defeat.
I have been in many long conversations with people such as Whitewraithe, and of course, other real truth seekers, and we all feel the same way. Many times we all feel that we are indeed losing this war, but we just feel it is our duty to not give up, and not give into the idea of defeat.
I, and others do feel that we can still make a difference, and that there are still people out there with at least the rationality and critical thinking skills to understand that there is a battle between good and evil on this planet, and we must do our part in trying to defeat the evil. It again comes down to whether we are going to win this war, or we are going to accept our enslavement for eternity.
One thing that I have noticed since my own awakening a very long time ago, is that once you know the real truth about our world, and the criminal tribe that wants to enslave us all, you quickly lose a lot of friends. I used to have such a strong group of close friends that I could reach out and confide in, but once you discover the truth and try to reach out to people and tell them of these findings, many of those friends simply disappear.
I have lost most of my own closest friends, and even with writing this blog, many others have also distanced themselves from me.. Many say I am “nuts” even without looking into my writings and findings for themselves….. Yes, again … the brainwashing is that intense.” >Source
|They’re telling you: ‘Forget your history, Europeans … envision a future Canada without Whites.’|
[The way we were BEFORE mass 3rd-world, non-white immigration: City of Toronto – Yonge St. PHOTOS circa 1970s]
In 1988, multiculturalism in Canada officially became government policy. This was the year the policy became entrenched in our constitution, thereby completing a seventeen year long transition from political ideology to legislated government policy.
Within Canadian society, this is fairly common knowledge. What may be less well known is that on an international scale, constitutionally-based multiculturalism is a rarity. In fact, only two nations in the world have such a policy: Canada and Australia. While many countries promote the concept of diversity, a mere (1%) of the world’s nations are officially multicultural.
At present, Canada has the highest per-capita immigration rates in the world. In conjunction with legislated multiculturalism, the impact upon our nation has been profound — so profound, it is arguable the long-term result will be a complete reinvention of Canadian society.
|White man smiling at his own replacement cohorts|
For decades, Canadians have been informed by government that multiculturalism is equitable, and beneficial to all. Is this really the case? The answer, one which may surprise a great number of Canadians … is absolutely not.
The reason for this cannot be found simply by reading the statute’s content — though it does contain explicit wording which validates its negative impact — but rather, in the degree to which external circumstances surrounding the policy have changed.
One of the most relevant issues is the manner in which our society has defined the word “minority” — as in one of Canada’s minority communities. In 1988, the definition was relatively straight forward. The reasons for this are simple enough: in terms of overall population these communities were clearly in the minority.
In this regard, however, things have obviously changed. Decades of large-scaleIMMIGRATION, particularly from Asia and the Middle East, have rendered the traditional meaning of the term irrelevant. Dozens of constituencies in Canada are majority non-white — for example Richmond, B.C., and Brampton, Ontario.
What is the difference between a country like the U.S., who promote “diversity”, and a country such as Canada, which has the official policy? The answer isMONEY — as in monetaryFUNDING — as in the fact that multicultural policy mandates that our tax payer dollars … hundreds of millions of them, be given to ethnic and multicultural organizations to promote their specific culture and identity.
Is this necessarily unfair, or harmful? No, unless a situation were to develop whereby the so-called “minority” becomes the dominant population within the host community. In 2014, this was the case in twenty-six out of Canada’s 308 political ridings. A number of additional ridings will soon find themselves in a similar situation.
Let us consider the ramifications of this new reality. Canadians of European descent are now minorities within these twenty-six ridings — and yet hundreds of millions of dollars are still being funnelled to multicultural organizations to promote their cultural agendas — despite the fact they are no longer minorities at all. On the flip side, the freshly-minted Caucasian-minorities receive nothing. Even more disconcerting, is the fact that when citizens point out the inequality of the present system, the pro-multicultural forces play what is known as the “race card”.
What is this curious phrase all about? In basic terms, playing the race card occurs when multicultural leaders accuse those who question the funding, or any other aspect of multicultural orIMMIGRATION policy, of behaving in a “racist” manner. Lacking a sound, logical rebuttal, they deliver the only tool they have in their arsenal: the race card. Thus far, it has proven to protect their interests successfully. The positive news is, however, the general public are beginning to understand the insidious world of what can most appropriately be called “Multicult” Canada.
To comprehend the full scope of the Multicult’s influence upon our society, we must first realize that the agenda is not served up on a platter for all to understand. It is very much a hidden operation, and not intended for general public understanding. For instance, is the public aware of multiculturalism’s influence within our institutions of higher learning? They certainly should be. Hundreds of millions of dollars are being provided to our largest universities for the purpose of promoting non-democratic political ideology to Canadian-born students. That is, the few of them still walking the halls of University of Toronto, McGill, or University of British Columbia. UBC’s own data tells us the percentage of Canadian-born students on campus is eroding at a rapid pace, largely due to the fact that foreign students pay double, and even triple, the tuition fees of Canadian students.
As with our multicultural organizations, communism on campus is largely paid for by Canadian tax payers. Less commonly understood, is the fact, that a significant portion of the funding comes directly from China’s Ministry of Education. Bottom line? Canadian tax payers, along with the government of China, have paid for the establishment of “Asian Studies” departments throughout our university system. The most conspicuous example is our half-dozen branches of China’s Confucius Institute. There used to be more, however due to accusations that the organization is little more than a propaganda arm of China’s government, a number of universities have formally severed ties with the organization.
Throughout our business community, multiculturalism, or “diversity”, as the banking industry prefers to call it, is trumpeted within the board rooms of all major Canadian corporations. They can dress it up with a fancy word, but they cannot take away the fact that in reality, diversity meansHIRING a person based on their ethnicity, rather than their job qualifications. Even under these circumstances, pro-Multicult leaders and academics continue to bash White Canadians for having the nerve to be better qualified for jobs, or for having a full command of one of our official languages.
Multiculturalism in Canada has long become aMONEY-MAKINGindustry which is eradicating traditional Canadian culture, heritage and identity. Clearly, the situation is serious business. […] [M]ulticultural policy in Canada has led to a situation whereby the Canadian public are funding the demise of their own culture. Over half a billion dollars ($500,000,000) has been taken from tax payers and delivered to a relatively small collection of multicultural organizations, ostensibly for purposes of ethnic “cultural promotion”. At least, promoting their ethnicity is what they used to do. Today, the use of the money goes well beyond promotion, and is presently being utilized to undermine traditional Canadian identity, culture and religion, as well as our official languages.
It all sounds rather ominous. However, upon close inspection of the activities of organizations such as Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada, SUCCESSIMMIGRANT SERVICES, Mosaic, and Canada-China Business Council — often in tandem with our real estate or banking industries — a tangible pattern of cultural erosion can be detected.
All the while, Canadians go about their daily business, the majority of whom are simply unaware of the multicultural power game playing out within their nation. There have been, however, some promising signs of change. Several articles which recently appeared in mainstream news (MSM) publications have helped expose the nation of China’s influence upon Canada’s real estate market. In Vancouver, a petition to regulate foreign real estate investment has gathered over 24,000 signatures. Most recently, a public rally took place to protest a growing lack of home affordability. Even Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson, an absolute champion of all-things-China, issued a public statement on the need for “something to be done” to help with home affordability for lower and middle income residents.
In short, Canadians are beginning to push back against enforced multiculturalism andIMMIGRATION — both of which were implemented without public input, or approval. Frankly, it is about time. The fact is, if the status quo is maintained for much longer … traditional Canadian culture, heritage and identity will become fully marginalized, and eventually eliminated.
First, view this 1 min. video clip to understand the background.
SONG – “If this is the way my race ends…“
Also read: “A Racial Program for the 20th Century“
What Feminism has done:
1. It has made men less likely to get a job as a cop or fireman. Despite being bigger, stronger and more capable of dealing with physical threats, employment-equity (affirmative action) requires that less capable women are hired before men. I am especially comforted by the ones who are 5’ 2’’, 130 lbs with painted nails and mascara. I’ve seen several of them. They make me feel so safe.
(Also see: Toronto Police Losing “Face”)
2. It has given teenage girls reproductive freedom and sexual equality to males. As a result, our society is rampant with single baby-mothers, my children’s school is full of troubled children who grow up deprived of a father’s guidance, and our jails are full of angry, fatherless young criminal men.
3. It has made me appreciate my stay-at-home mom-wife 1000% more. I see my buddies rush to make breakfast and deliver the kids to daycare everyday. I hear about how their working wives are too tired to have sex. I watch their kids dine on take-out food and get fat as they live their lives deprived of wholesome home-cooked meals because mommy has to stay at work late to write a report.
4. It has allowed me to wait longer for medical care. There are only so many places available in medical school and over 50% of all doctors graduating these days are female. Female doctors work considerably fewer hours than their male counterparts. And unlike men, they take time off when having children. Therefore, they see fewer patients. I cannot count the number of people who have mentioned to me how little their female doctors work.
5. It has picked my pocket dry with its endless demands for more tax dollars to fund government programs like state-funded daycare that would not be necessary if they just took motherhood more seriously than their own selfish feminist ambitions.
6. It has deprived the world of millions of intelligent children. Intelligence is largely genetic. Many of today’s brightest women are not having children, choosing instead to pursue careers. This has deprived humanity and future generations of their DNA.
Don’t roll your eyes at me. I am not saying that everyone — men and women alike — should not be able to pursue their own private ambitions. And sure … some women cops could take on a man in a physical confrontation, some women doctors work as much as male doctors, and some women do have careers with no negative impact on their motherly duties. But most do not.
Books, magazines, TV, and radio are constantly awash with stories of exhausted, conflicted women trying to do it all. Childless career women are apparently the most conflicted of all. In fact, an entire psychiatric industry has grown up around these feminist-caused problems.
What I am simply trying to do here is point out the unintended negative consequences of feminism on men in particular, and society as a whole. With every action there is an equal and opposite…well, you know. […] Source
By Sarah, Maid of Albion
One of the many weapons our opponents use against us, and also against others of European ancestry, is often termed historical “white guilt”. Those who hate us often point accusingly to our Empire, and to our involvement in the transatlantic slave trade with the implication that we, particularly the British and European Americans, are uniquely guilty of crimes against other races. They believe that — by making us feel guilty about our past — we will be less inclined to object to what is done to us on behalf of our alleged victims.
However, as in so many areas, the truth does not suit their agenda, so they resort to their favoured tactic, and lie with the ease and practiced familiarity of an ageing harlot unzipping her client’s pants.
In our schools and on our television screens, they teach an entirely false and misleading version of history, and sadly it is one which at least two generations of our children now accept as unquestioned fact. Our empire, the greatest the world has ever known is presented as being a cruel and oppressive force which was primarily concerned with plundering other nations and exploiting their peoples.
The story they tell us about the slave trade is also a lie. It’s a lie which they use primarily against Britain and America and it is upon that lie which I will focus in this post.
The lies and myths about slavery are told with the same cynicism as those who voted to ban hunting with hounds under the pretence that they were motivated by animal welfare “concerns”. So intent are they in presenting slavery as a White against black crime that they actively seek to play down the fact that an estimated 27 million people are living in various forms of slavery right now in the 21st Century, more than twice the number transported to America during the total transatlantic slave trade with the effect that less is done than otherwise would be to help those currently in slavery, but are an embarrassment over which a politically correct veil must be drawn.
Our enemies also misrepresent the truth about historical slavery. Transatlantic slavery did not exist in a vacuum — the slave trade was not invented by Americans or Europeans. Slavery had been part of the human condition since the earliest civilisations — look to the Torah, the Old Testament and the Koran, all of which have copious references to slavery written, a millennium or more before America was discovered, and whilst the most Europeans lived in tribes and wore woad.
The historical revisionists of the left keep trying to tell us that cradle of civilisation was in North Africa, but they forget to mention that — if it was — it was built by slaves.
Even during the few centuries in which Europe and America were involved in slavery, we were not even the main players. Slavery was being carried out throughout the world, particularly in Asia, Africa and the Middle East. The African, Arab and Asian involvement in slavery existed long before the transatlantic slave trade, and continued well after abolition, and involved far greater numbers of people.
A wrong is a wrong whoever commits it, and it is inequitable, and arguably racist, to hold one group more accountable than another on the grounds of pigmentation. I am not stating these facts in order to excuse the transatlantic slave trade, but merely to set it in context and in perspective. You can not single out one or two nations for unique condemnation, when, in truth they merely, and briefly, got involved in what almost everyone else was doing, and which other nations had been doing for thousands of years.
This is particularly inequitable given that in 1807, Britain was one of the first nations on planet earth to abolish the slave trade and then through her Empire brought about the abolition of slavery across a quarter (25%) of the earth’s surface a mere 26 years later. (a stunning achievement given that the British Empire included many lands where slavery had been a fact of life for thousands of years, and that this huge task was achieved in an age before aeroplanes, helicopters and satellite communications.)
Furthermore, throughout most of the 19th Century the Royal Navy was actively involved in combating the slave trade as perpetrated by other nations, so we enforced abolition well beyond our own dominions.
Indeed, British and other European colonialism itself, far from oppressing our subject nations, played a pivotal role in freeing them from the threat of being captured by Arab slavers, castrated (unlike in America, there are few descendants of those enslaved by Islam) and shipped to Arabia to be worked to death.
If you look to the history of Eastern Africa in the 19th Century, Britain was the major force in ending the Arab slave trade from places like Uganda, Northern Kenya and Zanzibar. We are repeatedly reminded of the slave caves around the coast of Western Africa used by transatlantic slave traders, however there are similar caves on the east of Africa from whence the cargo travelled north and east over far more centuries, and in far greater numbers.
Another point supporting the fact that European colonialism brought about the end of slavery is that the only African country where it was still legal to own slaves well into the 1920’s was Ethiopia, one of the only African nations which was never colonised and even then it was only abolished in order to gain Ethiopia access to the League of Nations.
On the other side of the Atlantic, also in 1807, the US Congress banned the importation of slaves, and 54 years later, well over half a million young, White, Americans died in a (Civil) war fought partly in order to free the slaves. I am aware of no similar gesture on the part of those Arab, Asian and African states which had owned and traded in slaves for millennia before Britain’s comparatively brief, three hundred year involvement, including those, such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Yemen, Oman and Mauritania, which didn’t get around to banning slavery until 100 years after the American Civil war (and where some would say forms of slavery continue to this day) or in Mauritania which only imposed a ban last year — or Sudan where slavery allegedly still exists.
How odd that we don’t hear calls for reparations from those countries where slaves were openly owned within living memory. Of course, silly me, they are not White European nations, and can’t be held responsible for what they do.
That said, I personally see no justification in holding current generations of Arabs or Africans responsible for the acts of earlier generations (even though those were quite recent generations). Guilt dies with the guilty, and inherited or racial guilt is an abstract and unsupportable concept, which is, at its heart racist. However, it is a guilt which we in Europe and North America are expected to carry and acknowledge, despite the fact that the guilt of our forefathers is so much less than the guilt of others, and that we have done so much more than others to right a universal wrong.
The staggeringly important fact about the slave trade is not that Britain and America joined in for a while, it is we alone brought it to an end.
Instead of suffering White-guilt over slavery — by comparison with many other nations — we British and our U.S. cousins have a great deal to be proud of. >Source
The relevant part of the meaning of the term for us is… “the mental stress or discomfort experienced by an individual who…is confronted by new information that conflicts with existing beliefs, ideas, or values.”
For the purposes of this blog, that would be the theories of race, multiculturalism, and diversity … promoted by the (MSM) mainstream media Vs reality … as seen in real life.
“Cognitive dissonance” theory is a key weapon in the promotion of multiculturalism.
It was thought-up by Jewish psychologist Leon Festinger. It has proved very useful in devising methods to overcome prejudice. Festinger also came up with “proximity theory” – simply that you become friends with whoever is near you. In many ways he is the ideological father of Section 8 housing in the United States.
Most people believe that stress caused by the increasing gap between what people see in the media … and what they see in real life, will cause people to wake up. This is a myth.
Experiments in “cognitive dissonance” have shown that in order to escape from the stress, it induces most people to capitulate to multicultural brainwashing and just accept the status quo. Other experiments in “cognitive dissonance” have also shown that a high level of “racism-hatred” of other races – is also useless as a defense against multicultural brainwashing.
So the fact that distrust of the mainstream media (MSM) is at an all–time high is irrelevant. This just means that cognitive dissonance is also at an all time high – and this has always been shown to break peoples’ will to resist. The fact that people are becoming more vocally “racist” is also irrelevant. High levels of “hatred” of other races can be easily overcome.
Experiments have shown that the key thing in neutralizing “cognitive dissonance” and diversity-brainwashing is not distrust of the media or “racism” … but LOVE – just love of your own race, the WHITE race.
One study said: “Racism is pro-white… rather than anti-black”. Cognitive Dissonance is ineffective against Love of the White race. That is why the enemy propaganda message was converted from ‘other races are good‘ to ‘the White race is useless‘ (or bad, or is “privileged”). How do we combat it? Here is the flaw in ‘cognitive dissonance’.
The elites don’t care if you’re “racist”. They don’t care if you go online and slander Jews, blacks and Arabs. The don’t care how negative you are towards other races. Because they know from their experiments that no matter how much you “hate” other races … you will be beaten. The elitists don’t fear your so-called “hatred” of other races. So what do they fear?
What they fear … is love of your own race – the White race, so “racism” is pro-white and not anti-black. > Source
|“We are the Ideal Family in Canada” (??)|
According to University of Toronto sociologist Shyon Baumann, there are too many White faces in Canadian ads, and he does not like it:
The media does have the power to shape our ideas about who people are. The media can reinforce cultural values that are already out there, so when we see commercials that feature characters that we are not used to seeing — a black family eating at a restaurant rather than a white family — little by little if we are exposed to those ideas over time, it broadens the idea of what is normal.
Sears Optical needs to be punished. They need to be taught a lesson. They need to keep up with the times. Don’t they know that we are living in the new Canada? Don’t they know that ours is an “inclusive” multi-racial and multi-cultural society where every colour of the rainbow must be represented everywhere, and at all times? Don’t they know that most of their customers reside in Canada’s five major centres, all of which boast of their “diversity” — and that the biggest, TORONTO — is, as a CTV commercial put it — proud to be a “conduit” to the world?
What are people of colour who watch this Sears Optical commercial to think? What are their children to think? What are they to think if they don’t see themselves, or people who look like themselves …in each and every damn TV ad?
They might feel that they don’t belong to this country. They might feel “excluded”. Unwanted. What a terrible thing to do to children! You can only imagine what this will do to their self-esteem. [For less astute readers, the above was written as partial sarcasm. ELN Editor]
Seriously … this Sears Optical commercial was conspicuous because it was exceptional. Typically, almost all TV ads in Canada today use inter-racial settings to provide a trendy backdrop to sell products from cars to soap to coffee. You name it.
In so doing, they offer viewers a lens to see the Canadathey want us to see, a carefully manufactured multi-ethnic utopia where ethnic communities are meshing seamlessly. It’s a narrative of colour-blindness and cross-cultural congruity that is meant to flatter us. “See, Canada’s great experiment in multiculturalism is an outstanding success. Our model is working. Canada is the exception to the rule. We alone, have discovered the secret formula of mixing oil and water. And these ads prove it. They’re a barometer of our progress.”
Thus “diversity advertising” is able to kill two birds with one stone by serving twin objectives. The first, obviously, is to broaden the company’s customer base. The second is to demonstrate corporate responsibility by “getting with the program” and falling into line with the national all-party agenda. “We aren’t just serving you, our customers, we are serving the country and its great cause. Look, even our employees are diverse. We walk the talk.”
Some Canadians — “rednecks”, “racists”, and “bigots” — you know the type — might be seething with rage about all of this. They might think as I do. They don’t think that the appearance of non-white faces on television is objectionable because somehow skin colour is correlated with good or bad character. Nor do they believe that the people of colour who are depicted on the screen are less ‘Canadian‘ than they are, or that they don’t deserve to be treated well or accorded the full rights of citizenship. No, that’s not it. That is not what makes them angry.
They’re angry because they believe that this ‘diversity-in-your-face‘ strategy is deliberately designed to convey a clear message to Canadians of European origin: Traditional Canada — the Canada of two founding (White European) nations — the bi-cultural Canada, is history. It’s dead. And it’s never coming back. So get over it. Move on. And most of all … (just) shut up!
Unfortunately, I won’t.
Don’t get me wrong. I don’t have a problem with how people look, or that their genes are different from mine. As a matter of fact, two people in my family are non-white, and three are ‘half-caste’. No, that is not my problem.
My problem is what the proliferation of brown faces in new(s) casts, parliament, talk shows and TV dramas reflect. It reflects the success of an agenda that was never put to a vote, and for which no federal government ever had a mandate to pursue. The agenda of mass immigration and Official Multiculturalism. The agenda of cutting Canada from its European moorings by casting the immigration net across the world, of transforming what was once a largely bi-cultural country into a multicultural dog’s breakfast … of recruiting cheap labour from failed states … of packing our cities with more and more people who must squeeze tighter and tighter, while subdividing farmland to alleviate the pressure. The result? Higher density and sprawl at the same time. The worst of both worlds.
“Stupid” White man needs affirmation from a Black woman. If the roles were reversed in this TV commercial, there would be vociferous voices calling out for a boycott against Scotia Bank.
Now, for the some reality:
These [racially] “inclusive” TV commercials are a persistent reminder that we are losing our country, that we are the guinea pigs of a social engineering project that we never agreed to. Hapless victims of a game plan hatched many decades ago, before half of us were even born. Casualties of a disease that went largely undetected until its symptoms finally became obvious to all.
Slowly, step by step, these commercials are conditioning us to accept that what we now see is “normal”, making what is to come — less worrisome. In essence, they are setting us up for a future where Euro-Canadianswill be marginalized in every major city of the country. Breaking us in and breaking us down.
The process has been insidious. No wonder so many of us were taken by surprise. No wonder that legislative changes and ideas that seemed harmless, or trivial, or even laudable at the time, once planted, took root and suddenly exploded across the landscape to envelop all of our institutions, like morning glory in the late spring.
Even now, there are people in our own ethnic ranks who are mesmerized by its beautiful blossoms, unable to grasp that it is an invasive species that won’t quit until it has displaced all before it. It may be too late to stop its progress, or uproot the policies that fertilize it. If that is the case, I don’t need TV commercials to rub more salt into my wounds.
Thank you, Sears Optical, for your careless oversight. It was nice of you to give us a look into the rear-view mirror and see the Canada which we once knew and lost. The one that they want us to repudiate and forget. >Source: http://www.eurocanadian.ca (For added emphasis, Bolded, Italicized, underlined words and links by ELN editor)
TORONTO, Ontario – 1977