Junk food blamed for bad behavior
in city dominated by blacks and Hispanics.
Hartford, Connecticut is the second poorest city in the United States, second only to Brownsville, Texas. The median household income was less the $21,000 per year.
Dominated by a burgeoning black and Hispanic population, the city
serves as a harbinger for the entire nation should amnesty legislation open the flood gates on our Southern border. 43.4 percent of Hartford is Hispanic or Latino. The black population, 38.7%, is nearly as high. Only 29.8% are White. The population total was 124,775 according to the 2010 census.
It’s an ugly reality. We’ve been mentally and emotionally conditioned to dismiss the legacy of violent crime, poverty, and lack of innovation that follows such communities as being attributed to genetic predispositions.
Why can’t we accept the truth, even when it stares us in the face?
There are revisionists who rewrite history in real time. They observe a condition, such as the violent crime and poverty that prevails in Hartford, and discover it fails to follow the cultural Marxist narrative. That narrative assumes external forces rather than genetic predispositions necessarily account for violent crime and poverty among non-white populations. The quest for a replacement cause requires substantial creativity.
Violent crime in Hartford is considered ‘epidemic.’ That prompted a Congressional field hearing to determine its cause.
A news report published in November of this year stated that “a
Congressional field hearing in Hartford today heard that bad diet is also
causing the epidemic of violence and shootings.”
Bad diet. Seriously? Why would the revisionists stoop to such a brutish, nonsensical conclusion?
The answer should be obvious. The traditional villains assigned to such story telling are not present. There is no substantial White population to blame and the White population that does exist — those who fled the violent crime of Hartford to its whitopian suburbs — is saturated with liberal ideology. Blaming White liberals for non-white failures is simply untenable to the storytellers.
Connecticut harbors some of the most restrictive gun control laws in the union. Check Second Amendment rights off the list of probable causes. The
state is also known for it generous welfare programs. There is no hay to be
made harping on the lack of government handouts to remedy societal ills.
The most convincing story they could contrive blames the poverty,
violence, and crime that is epidemic in Hartford on bad diet. French fries were specifically cited. Are we seriously supposed to believe that removing fried potatoes from the diets of blacks and Hispanics would erase the epidemic of violent crime? Yes. We are expected to believe, or at least pretend to believe, such nonsense.
The alternative is to accept reality.
Instead, the commission persisted in its folly. Cultures whose diets are rich in fish and fish oils tend be less violent. The connection is apparent to true believers. The fact that societies who prefer seafood diets also happen to be East Asian with higher-than-average intellects is not considered.
What to do?
Force-feeding blacks and Hispanic fish oil while depriving them of fried chicken and potatoes is as likely as persuading them to spend their Saturday evenings at the opera.
Liberals, of course, know that and so they hold the ideal excuse to avoid the harsh reality that violent crime is related to low intellects.
A syllogism follows their logic.
1. Crime is caused by a lack of fish oil consumption.
2. Blacks and Hispanic will be damned before they indulge in such toxic-tasting substances.
3. The violent crime problem cannot be resolved.
An end note points to the theory that poverty begets violence.
Never is it considered that violence begets poverty. Nor is it considered that poverty and violent crime are siblings birthed by parents with low intellects.
At what point do we end the absurdities, face the fact that denial derails our
efforts to provide serious solutions to high-crime regions, and send cultural
Famed psychologist Author Jensen who invested much of his career studying intelligence concluded that most violent crime is committed by males between the ages of 18 and 49 who have IQs ranging between 70 and 90.
Conversely, persons with IQs lower than 70 and higher than 90 are less likely to commit violent crimes.
Brownsville, Texas, by the way, is only slightly larger than Hartford. It’s population of 175,000 is 93.19% Hispanic or Latino. It’s violent crime rate is lower than both the national and state averages and is trending downward year-over-year. To my knowledge the consumption of fish oil and french fries in Brownsville, Texas is not noticeably different from that in Hartford, Connecticut. Reality beckons. http://dailykenn.blogspot.ca/
Blacks LESS Intelligent?
IQ And The Wealth of Nations
To Recognize Racial Differences
Importing Black Violence
Importing Jamaican “Culture”
Is Racial Diversity Good For Canada?