White British Births In Steep Decline

ENGLAND (early 1960s)

By Frederick Dixon

If you were lucky – because it received little (media) coverage – you will have caught a news item the other day; that the percentage of White British births in England and Wales fell in 2014 to its lowest level ever of 65.3%.

Well, of course it was the lowest level ever (so far) because until not so long ago, and well within living memory, nearly everyone in the country was White British, so naturally were nearly all of the births. But, it’s been downhill ever since the first Jamaicans stepped off the Empire Windrush at Tilbury in June 1948, and the decline has accelerated since the beginning of the century – in 2005 around 72% of births were White British, in 2009 the figure had fallen to 68.8% (the only two years for which I have been able to find relevant figures before 2014) … and now down to 65.3%.

(Read: Britain On Suicide Watch)

These figures imply an annual rate of decline of nearly 0.7%. If it continues at that rate White British births will be a minority in little more than 20 years, which tallies nicely with a forecast by the Department for Education (or whatever it’s called nowadays) that White British pupils will be a minority in schools in England by 2037. The relevant word, of course, is “if” – Britain might exit the EU and thus recover the right to control our own borders; we might hope, however faintly, that we will get a government with the will to do just that, but the prospect of such a government became more remote than ever when David Cameron morphed into Tony Blair at the recent Conservative Party conference!

That this headlong decline to dispossession is indeed halted is something for which we should all hope and work. But even if it is halted, what then? We will find ourselves in a country in which, we White British, are just one of a multitude of races and cultures sharing what was, until the day before yesterday … our homeland. Our only real long term chance of survival as an identifiable people is to act and think in our own interests as an ethnicity, as a people with an identity and with interests quite distinct from those of the nation state in which we find ourselves living.

London, England – TODAY

Once upon a time the “nation”, and the “race” were the same, and  >continued HERE.

Also read:

Last Call for WHITE Britain

How Britain Destroyed Itself

Telling IT, Like It IS

Media Suppress Facts on Crime

By Mister Fox
Changing Reality

Two surprising articles about race and the First World recently appeared in the world’s media: the first in Britain and the other in Russia. Both revealed startling truths which are worth considering in detail.

In Britain, Rod Liddle wrote the wrong thing on his Spectator blog about two black youths who conspired to push a pregnant woman into a canal as part of a failed murder plot:

The overwhelming majority of street crime, knife crime, gun crime, robbery and crimes of sexual violence in London is carried out by young men from the African-Caribbean community. In return for all this crime, the black community has given Britain ‘rap music, goat curry and a far more vibrant and diverse understanding of cultures which were once alien to us’.
For which, many thanks

The Thought Police immediately stepped in to suppress this way of thinking. The Thought Police have been described as an “ideological caste” because they are an elite who hold power and grant patronage to people who say the right things, and destroy those who transgress. (Where is Ron Atkinson the former manager and TV football pundit?) To get into power say the right things; to stay in power, say the right things.

In response to Mr Liddle’s comments, Diane Abbott, MP for Hackney, retreated into history to try to denigrate his accurate comments by comparing him to fascist leader Oswald Mosley.

Yet on her blog, Ms Abbott once admitted: “Sadly, 80% of gun crime in London is ‘black-on-black,’ often involving boys in their teens. As a black woman and the mother of a teenage son, this is frightening and wholly unacceptable.”

So frightening and unacceptable that Ms Abbot sent her children to a fee-paying school rather than to a local state secondary. In her own words, “too many black boys were unsuccessful within inner-city state schools.”

Ministry of Justice figures for 2007/2008 claim that only 2.2 percent of Britons aged ten or above are black, yet 14% of criminal cases tried in a crown court involve black suspects. For some crimes, the figures are even more alarming. One controversial report conducted by Scotland Yard last year found that more than half (50%) of teen knife crime offences in the capital involve black suspects.

Two years ago the Commons home affairs committee warned of a “serious crisis” among Britain’s young black community.

The public are given a false view of reality so that they cannot make a mature decision on the important topics of the day. Democracy is only possible when adults make mature decisions based on the facts.

Yet the Western media deny the public the facts and thereby have corrupted the political process. How many Europeans have ever heard of the Knoxville murders when a gang of blacks brutally murdered an innocent White couple? The case contained horrific details and if the races of the perpetrators and victims had been reversed, the whole world would know about it.  (For emphasis, Underlined, Bold, Italicized words and links added by ELN Editor)   …con’t reading HERE.

Recent Black crime reports from the TORONTO area: HERE

Also read:

Importing Black Violence (Canada)

African Violence Comes To IRELAND

AUSTRALIA Meets With Black Crime

“White” Criminals Who Are NOT White (Mugshots)


Philadelphia Shooters 95% NON-white

U.S. – Black on White murders  (Small sampling)

“White Guilt” Is NOT Necessary

 By Sarah, Maid of Albion

One of the many weapons our opponents use against us, and also against others of European ancestry, is often termed historical “white guilt”. Those who hate us often point accusingly to our Empire, and to our involvement in the transatlantic slave trade with the implication that we, particularly the British and European Americans, are uniquely guilty of crimes against other races. They believe that — by making us feel guilty about our past — we will be less inclined to object to what is done to us on behalf of our alleged victims.

However, as in so many areas, the truth does not suit their agenda, so they resort to their favoured tactic, and lie with the ease and practiced familiarity of an ageing harlot unzipping her client’s pants.

In our schools and on our television screens, they teach an entirely false and misleading version of history, and sadly it is one which at least two generations of our children now accept as unquestioned fact. Our empire, the greatest the world has ever known is presented as being a cruel and oppressive force which was primarily concerned with plundering other nations and exploiting their peoples.

The story they tell us about the slave trade is also a lie. It’s a lie which they use primarily against Britain and America and it is upon that lie which I will focus in this post.
Guilt-ridden WHITE Man and his son“So Sorry”, “So Sorry”
The lies and myths about slavery are told with the same cynicism as those who voted to ban hunting with hounds under the pretence that they were motivated by animal welfare “concerns”. So intent are they in presenting slavery as a White against black crime that they actively seek to play down the fact that an estimated 27 million people are living in various forms of slavery right now in the 21st Century, more than twice the number transported to America during the total transatlantic slave trade with the effect that less is done than otherwise would be to help those currently in slavery, but are an embarrassment over which a politically correct veil must be drawn.

Our enemies also misrepresent the truth about historical slavery. Transatlantic slavery did not exist in a vacuum — the slave trade was not invented by Americans or Europeans. Slavery had been part of the human condition since the earliest civilisations — look to the Torah, the Old Testament and the Koran, all of which have copious references to slavery written, a millennium or more before America was discovered, and whilst the most Europeans lived in tribes and wore woad.

The historical revisionists of the left keep trying to tell us that cradle of civilisation was in North Africa, but they forget to mention that — if it was — it was built by slaves.

Even during the few centuries in which Europe and America were involved in slavery, we were not even the main players. Slavery was being carried out throughout the world, particularly in Asia, Africa and the Middle East. The African, Arab and Asian involvement in slavery existed long before the transatlantic slave trade, and continued well after abolition, and involved far greater numbers of people.

A wrong is a wrong whoever commits it, and it is inequitable, and arguably racist, to hold one group more accountable than another on the grounds of pigmentation. I am not stating these facts in order to excuse the transatlantic slave trade, but merely to set it in context and in perspective. You can not single out one or two nations for unique condemnation, when, in truth they merely, and briefly, got involved in what almost everyone else was doing, and which other nations had been doing for thousands of years.

This is particularly inequitable given that in 1807, Britain was one of the first nations on planet earth to abolish the slave trade and then through her Empire brought about the abolition of slavery across a quarter (25%) of the earth’s surface a mere 26 years later. (a stunning achievement given that the British Empire included many lands where slavery had been a fact of life for thousands of years, and that this huge task was achieved in an age before aeroplanes, helicopters and satellite communications.)

Furthermore, throughout most of the 19th Century the Royal Navy was actively involved in combating the slave trade as perpetrated by other nations, so we enforced abolition well beyond our own dominions.

Indeed, British and other European colonialism itself, far from oppressing our subject nations, played a pivotal role in freeing them from the threat of being captured by Arab slavers, castrated (unlike in America, there are few descendants of those enslaved by Islam) and shipped to Arabia to be worked to death.

If you look to the history of Eastern Africa in the 19th Century, Britain was the major force in ending the Arab slave trade from places like Uganda, Northern Kenya and Zanzibar. We are repeatedly reminded of the slave caves around the coast of Western Africa used by transatlantic slave traders, however there are similar caves on the east of Africa from whence the cargo travelled north and east over far more centuries, and in far greater numbers.

Another point supporting the fact that European colonialism brought about the end of slavery is that the only African country where it was still legal to own slaves well into the 1920’s was Ethiopia, one of the only African nations which was never colonised and even then it was only abolished in order to gain Ethiopia access to the League of Nations.

On the other side of the Atlantic, also in 1807, the US Congress banned the importation of slaves, and 54 years later, well over half a million young, White, Americans died in a (Civil) war fought partly in order to free the slaves. I am aware of no similar gesture on the part of those Arab, Asian and African states which had owned and traded in slaves for millennia before Britain’s comparatively brief, three hundred year involvement, including those, such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Yemen, Oman and Mauritania, which didn’t get around to banning slavery until 100 years after the American Civil war (and where some would say forms of slavery continue to this day) or in Mauritania which only imposed a ban last year — or Sudan where slavery allegedly still exists.

How odd that we don’t hear calls for reparations from those countries where slaves were openly owned within living memory. Of course, silly me, they are not White European nations, and can’t be held responsible for what they do.

That said, I personally see no justification in holding current generations of Arabs or Africans responsible for the acts of earlier generations (even though those were quite recent generations). Guilt dies with the guilty, and inherited or racial guilt is an abstract and unsupportable concept, which is, at its heart racist. However, it is a guilt which we in Europe and North America are expected to carry and acknowledge, despite the fact that the guilt of our forefathers is so much less than the guilt of others, and that we have done so much more than others to right a universal wrong.

The staggeringly important fact about the slave trade is not that Britain and America joined in for a while, it is we alone brought it to an end.

Instead of suffering White-guilt over slavery — by comparison with many other nations — we British and our U.S. cousins have a great deal to be proud of.  >Source


Ban the Protests, But NOT Child-Rape

By Enza Ferreri

Rotherham to Ban Muslim Child-Rape Protests

EDL protest in Rotherham town centre

In late May, the local Council of Rotherham in Northern England, has asked the Government for special powers to have protest marches by “extremist groups” in the city outlawed.

Rotherham has been one of the places in England hit by Muslim paedophile gangs.

For 20 years, Muslim rings have been grooming White girls for sexual exploitation, totally undisturbed by police, social services, politicians and media. After the continuous cover-up became impossible, at one point there were at least 54 active investigations on as many grooming gangs in Britain. Assuming that each gang may have had dozens or hundreds of victims over the years, possibly thousands of White girls have been abused, raped and even murdered in all this time.

[Also see: http://newsfromatlantis.blogspot.ca/2015/06/england-is-not-pakistan-honestly.html]

Just because they were White – as the abuse had a racial and religious motivation – and because the authorities didn’t dare lift a finger against a minority protected by political correctness.

The ongoing scandal has generated outrage among that part of the population that, due to its geographical or social proximity to these crimes and the multicultural environment from which they originate, feels particularly affected by them.

Several street demonstrations have been organised by the English Defence League (EDL), Britain First and other organisations. Now Rotherham Council wants to ban the protests.

These had intensified after the publication of the so-called “Jay Report” last August, which revealed that “South Yorkshire Police and Rotherham Council had failed at least 1,400 victims of child sexual exploitation over a 16-year-period, with many of the main offenders being men of Pakistani origin“.

A group of EDL demonstrators set up camp outside Rotherham police station from 29 August to 13 September, calling for the resignation of police and crime commissioner Shaun Wright, who had been responsible for children’s services at Rotherham Council between 2005 and 2010.

The reason adduced by Rotherham Council for banning the legitimate protests is ostensibly economic: the great cost involved in policing both them and the Left’s counter-demonstrations, and the “blighted” image of the city, with consequent loss of town centre shopping and business.

At the end of the local newspaper article reporting on this, someone left this comment:

Rotherham was blighted by the systematic abuse of hundreds of young girls over 16 years, demonstration are a symptom of that blight, where do these idiots that are running Rotherham Council on huge inflated salaries paid for by the taxpayers come from.

Other comments echo similar feelings.

Only last week Bradford Police have charged14 men and a 16-year-old male from Keighley with sex offences relating to rape and sexual abuse of a child under 16“, alleged to have occurred in 2011-2012. The accused all have surnames like Hussain, Ali, Mahmood, Ziarab, Iqbal, Khan.

The local press has been alone in reporting this news, with the national media ignoring it.

Can banning protests deriving from a justified feeling of offence be the way forward?

And why is the cover-up, at least on the part of the media, apparently still going on?

Read more: http://enzaferreri.blogspot.com/#ixzz3cT3uGl2O
Follow us: @EnzaFerreri on Twitter | enza.ferreri on Facebook

40 years ago!

Also read:

UK’s MUSLIM Rape Gangs

An Awakening Experience

Gang Rapists Are Majority NON-whites


SWEDEN Tops In Rapes

HELLSTORM – Allied Slaughter of German Innocents

[Full Screen – Click open box in right corner]

The most common type of victim of the bombings... Germanic women with babies... burnt to death.

Germanic women and their children were the most common victims of these murderous British/American bombing raids, and who were subsequently burnt to death in the following fire storms deliberately set by incendiary bombs.

More information on the book “HELLSTORM” and where to order:

Also read:

Tears For Dresden

Dresden’s 14 Hours Of Hell


Some Forgotten Post-War History

The Unknown GERMAN Holocaust


Eisenhower’s Death Camps

Luftwaffe Pilot Spared B-17 Pilot’s Life

Invaders Now Dictating the Narrative

By Enza Ferreri

If this is not the essence of colonialism … I don’t know what is. A bunch of non-British pontificating on what the core values of Britain are … or should be.

We have here, on a BBC programme, one of the endless series of debates on “what is Britishness” that have been part of the UK public discourse only since the arrival on these shores, of vast numbers of people belonging to the ethnic, religious and geographic groups represented by most debaters in this video.

[Note how the “proverbial elephant” in the room (RACE) …is carefully avoided by almost everybody.]

Can you imagine 60, 100, 200 years ago, people having discussions on what Britishness was?Everybody knew what it was until mass, uncontrolled immigration from the Third-World started and (has) never stopped.

I found this comment to the video on YouTube spot on: “all because you non-whites have a British accent it doesn’t make u British“.

[Those NON-whites should read this: A Sense of Belonging ]

That being born and bred in this country … does not provide a national identity, or guarantee national loyalty, as is too often wrongly accepted, is demonstrated by an Asian man in this discussion. He openly declares that he was born and educated in Britain, but nevertheless his sense of identity is precisely not having that identity; indeed he goes as far as saying that Britishness means not having an identity.

[Read: Telling IT Like IT Is]

He was also very good at tying himself in (il)logical knots when he told a Hindu woman that her way of thinking was “unBritish“. How can you define what is “unBritish” if you haven’t defined “British“, since in his opinion, that word is tantamount to nothing?

It’s disingenuous of “Professor of Poetry” Benjamin Zephaniah to say … that multiculturalism has been part of Britain since the time of the ancient Celts, Picts and Romans, although that claim is a staple of the usual pro-multi-culti argument.

What he’s referring to was not multiculturalism.

That was war of different (White) peoples against each other. The Celts were in Britain first, then they were conquered by the Romans. After the Romans eventually left, the Celts fought against the Angles and the Saxons, and finally retreated to Wales, Scotland and Cornwall. Then it was the turn of the Vikings to war with the Anglo-Saxons, and after them the Normans invaded and dominated England.

It was violence and invasion, and it was bloody.

Make no mistake. Current immigration levels and the imposition of multiculturalism are entirely new historical phenomena without any precedent, not only in the history of Britain … but also of Europe.

It is an experiment carried out on the skin of the indigenous populations. Like all experiments, it can go very badly wrong, and there are numerous signs everywhere that it is.

And, as the TV debate in the video above truthfully represents, the (real) natives are marginalised voices in this experiment, and the decisions made about it, while the ethnic (for now) minorities have a much greater weight.

This video shows the new reality of the country: invasion and colonisation.  >Source (For added emphasis, bold, italicized, underlined words and links by ELN Editor)

A powerful Speech by Jonathan Bowden is added to this video showing real BRITISH people as they really were (circa 1900) — and still are — once awakened to their true nationality. It’s suggested you watch this video TWICE… once for the memorable scenes, and then again, to listen to the spoken words. 

Read more: http://enzaferreri.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2012-12-31T16:00:00-08:00&updated-max=2013-11-16T22:00:00-08:00&max-results=50&start=14&by-date=false#ixzz3X8KcZFSj
Follow us: @EnzaFerreri on Twitter | enza.ferreri on Facebook

Also read:

How To Colonize Britain

Diversity Is A Fraud

Multi-Racial Ireland?


A White Racial Crisis

Preventing WHITE Genocide

Source: United Nations, World Population Prospects: The 2006 Revision (2007).


Also read:

A White Racial Crisis

Embolden Minorities Eye Canada

Australia’s Declining WHITE Population

New Zealanders Against Asian Invasion


Full WHITE Genocide – The End Game