[Many] people today … know “something” is wrong with this society.
They see the “changes” that are really overt signs of decay. Most people are unhappy. Most people are fat. Most people don’t have fulfilling relationships. Most people are under financial pressure. Most people recognize that society at large is becoming more of a reflection of the 3rd world.
But they don’t know why.
Most people seem to find the concepts of freedom, knowledge, and the meaning of life to be perplexing in definition.
What is freedom to you? If you don’t have the option of doing the opposite – then you’re not free. How much freedom do you really have?
What is knowledge? If you can’t objectively and empirically justify your “belief” about something – then you merely hold a tentative idea … and it’s not knowledge.
What is the meaning of life to you? Is it control of your environment, and the subjugation of others by any means necessary, or is it the pursuit of truth – no matter where that leads?
What we are seeing is the advance of a certain group who hold that the meaning of life is to control the environment, and the subjugation of everyone else, by any means necessary. They are using certain tools to leverage this. The most pervasive is usury. Usury and the private issuance of monetary instruments at practically no cost to the issuer ensures that the private entity will own everything that the issued-money can buy. Adolf Hitler circumvented that by having Germany engage in straight barter with other countries – using no monetary instruments at all for international trade. They just “traded” finished goods for raw materials. That practice completely f*cked the jews.
Another major tool “they” use against us … is the application of various forms or brainwashing. The science of mind manipulation is very advanced now. Watching them do this is is really quite interesting. In the past they primarily used Pavlovian methods of behavior and thought control … today electronic media uses a combination of hypnosis, NLP and a few other key techniques to induce reflexive responses in the target audiences.
Anyone with a lot of experience in martial arts will understand the concept of “setting up” the opponent by inducing a reflexive response – that is then taken advantage of in the form of another maneuver. The uninitiated won’t even understand what he’s seeing as the master engages an opponent to induce a reflex. Once that reflex happens, the master fluidly executes his real plan.
That is the real “Art” in fighting.
The Globalist Communists have been hard at work developing what I refer to as “Mental Martial Arts”. They apply these methods primarily through the TV, but they are also used in universities.
Without question, the TV is the most influential medium of mass communication ever. It has joined the toilet as a nearly ubiquitous feature of the modern human dwelling.
The “average” American watches 5 hours and 11 minutes of television every single day. That’s 36 hours of TV every week. That translates into 1,872 hours. Let’s say … they averaged 8 hours of sleep each day and were awake for 16. That means they spend the equivalent of 117 entire waking days watching TV. If watching TV was limited to only 8 hours a day they’d be sitting there watching for 234 days straight. Obviously, TV watching is a massive issue.
Much of that “programming” has been devoted, either directly or indirectly at maligning the German National Socialists. To say that they “failed” and their ideas invalid does not reflect the facts.
They did not “fail”. They were bombed. They were subjected to mass murder. They were occupied and will continue to be occupied until at least 2099.
I submit that they succeeded and posed such an utter threat to the Globalist Communists, that even today NS ideas are feared by the Globalist Communists.
As for the Internet, it’s just a tool – but it is HEAVILY infiltrated. However, it can be used to a limited degree. The real action is in the real world with real people … and that is where much focus should be placed.
The conflict playing out before us is really very basic. I would prefer to see those whose view the meaning of life to be the pursuit of TRUTH – regardless of where that may lead — win. Source
The Daily Caller points out the possible intent of this move by Obama:
Those best practices likely will eventually include rules that restrict police investigations of groups that are part of the Democratic coalition, and rule that try to level convictions and penalties among various sub-groups of the United States, regardless of actual conviction rates.
“I think communities [with police forces] across the board are going to need to consider … recommendations around prohibiting racial profiling [and] that’s a step that we’ve already taken at the federal level,” Obama said.
Per Obama, “We need more information to find out how to take to scale best practices when it comes to training so that police officers are able to work in a way that reduces the possibilities of bias.”
Translation: All law enforcement officers are “racists” and need to be “retrained.”
Obama suggested that “state and local policing may need to be subordinated to federal social policy.” By changing “law enforcement” to “policing,” it suggests that only certain facets of police business will be addressed instead of the takeover of the state and local law enforcement agencies. Whenever Obama gets his finger in the pie, you can guarantee he’s going for the whole pie, not [just] a sample. The political goals of “Obamalaw” are presented in two simple statements in the report.
“Law enforcement agencies should acknowledge the role of policing in the past and present injustice and discrimination and how it is a hurdle to the promotion of community trust …. The Federal Government, as well as state and local agencies, should encourage and incentivize higher education for law enforcement officers.”
[…] Obama knows that his plan to bring state and local law enforcement under federal control will face heated opposition among the citizenry. He has planned for that and is eliciting the media to assist him — aka the federal government — in this takeover. […]
WARNING: Difficult-to-Watch Video of several “cops” brutalizing one unarmed man laying on the ground, while trying to force compliance to their demands.
Does this police response not constitute excessive use-of-force as determined by rules of human dignity and “common sense”? An injured dog laying on its back would would not even be subjected to such brutality by NORMAL human beings.
Some of these “officers of the law” (and, I use that term sparingly) are “walking-talking wrecking balls” capable oftarnishing that profession’s reputation for years to come, and should be fired from their jobs — if not held criminally responsible for their actions.
OR … is this police behavior just the accepted standard operating procedure in America, today? View this next video.
There is a beast whose tentacles envelope almost every area of society.
I would argue that almost every injustice – particularly those injustices specific to the English (and peoples indigenous to their country the World over) – is ultimately a result of this tentacled beast. It has a mostly unseen strangle-hold upon everything. It is responsible for over-taxation, immigration, political correctness, widespread drug abuse, poor health, corruption, war, abuse of the legal system and everything down to littering. And if anyone sincerely wants to know how it causes these things I think I could offer a reasonable explanation.
The head of the beast is unseen by most people, but many do observe its tentacles. Problem is, they do not recognise that those tentacles belong to the same body and so they campaign against immigration, or against pollution, or against war, or against taxation… or any other small issue which is important to them.
By doing this they are metaphorically stabbing at single tentacles, and on the rare occasion that they achieve a small victory they turn their backs in triumph only to find that the tentacle has regrown later on, but perhaps with a different texture and colour – sliming its way back into position slowly, so as not to be noticed.
So personally, I’m done with campaigning for those smaller issues because it feels futile to me. I do, of course, care about all of those things, and where I’m able to contribute without sacrificing too much time and money, I will, if only to maintain the spirit of rebellion. But I wholeheartedly believe that we must begin turning our attention to the head of the beast – to kill it.
To do that we must first be aware that it is one beast and that it has a central nervous system to be slain. This is what I attempt to do with my online presence, and my blog – to show people that these are pieces of a larger puzzle.
But how to kill it? We could identify the head (easily done), then arm ourselves and march upon the City of London. But in the unlikely event of a successful storming and roundup of those crooks involved, we would then find that the head of the beast is actually a mind shared by a beast in almost every country of the World. Those other beasts then turn on us in vengeance … and we have achieved nothing.
So I propose starving the beast.
Rather than go on the offensive and meet certain failure against a well-armed state, we build a formidable defence against their demands on us. We simply withdraw consent and cease to feed the beast that has demanded so much from us for so long.
We turn our backs on the material-consumer lifestyle and avoid bank loans. We avoid taxes without risking our livelihood where possible, we buy local and boycott supermarkets, withdraw our names from the electoral register, grow our own food, turn off the TV, stop buying newspapers, affect the energy companies by using less of their supply, homeschool, withhold the BBC Licence Fee, fight every unlawful parking and speeding fine… and so on.
The beast not only requires our money to survive, but our consent and allegiance. Their power is based on a self-created illusion, presented to us via television and popular media. Without that we wouldn’t even know about the thousands of new laws they apply every year. We wouldn’t know who the Queen is, and that she supposedly has a divine right to rule. We would begin focusing our attention on the real world around us and the people of our neighbourhood. Our community would be the new recipient of the ‘food’ we have withheld from the anonymous beast that overshadows our entire World. Source> Eye of Woden (No longer active)
The word “racism” is a weapon which works on an emotional level to keep the peoples of the world focused on an illusion. Until the last century, the word “racism” didn’t even exist. The word has become another tool of our oppressors, but what does it really mean?
To the non-thinking liberal, the word “racism” provokes feelings of anger at perceived oppression, resulting due to skin colour. This, of course, is exactly what the International Enemy wishes to convey. The powers-that-be have so crafted their politically-correct words of warfare, that the brain-washed liberals who populate much of the West, have come to believe that only NON-Europeans (“NON-whites”) can be oppressed — and thus — that Europeans can be the only people capable of mistreating others due to racial identity. This — like all aspects of “Political Correctness” — is absolute nonsense.
When liberals use the word “racism”, they unconsciously think of hostile actions founded on a belief in “racial supremacy”.
They conjure up, in their own minds, images of hooded (White) Europeans in the USA wearing the robes of the Ku Klux Klan, burning crosses and lynching Africans. This imagery leads to anger, and is focused entirely upon anyEuropeans who dare question the “wisdom” of multiculturalism. Leftists don’t even consider the fact that many non-Europeans also have no desire to see their people destroyed in the multi-culti ‘melting pot.’
For liberals, the plight of the people of Tibet is a tragedy. Indeed it is.
However, the people who chant “Free Tibet“, and who campaign to have the Chinese withdraw from that occupied nation, recoil in horror at the suggestion that all colonisation should be ended wherever it occurs. The occupied territories in Europe are of absolutely no interest to the wilfully blind liberal bigots, who can only perceive tyranny when the victims have non-White skin.
If Tibet was a European land, the liberals would be shrieking hatred for the indigenous population who wish to hold on to their identity. Those who rejoiced at the end of the British Empire in India idolise those who fought to make the British quit India and restore that land to its people; but they would happily lynch those who argue that the colonists from Pakistan who have swamped many English cities should quit Europe!
Liberals have been poisoned by the ideology of the International enemy, to the point where they have become consumed by self-hatred; which, to use their own term, is nothing but ‘racism’ – racial hatred of their own kind. [ … ]
However, there is one people which stands out from the rest of humanity; a people led by lunatics who not only believe in Racial Supremacy, but who believe in an all-powerful invisible entity which hates everybody except them, and which will deliver all humanity into slavery to serve these megalomaniacs. That one people — does not come from Europe! >continue to Full Article
This video clip demonstrates how the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) subtly approves of miscegenation, thus leaving the impression that race-mixing is a perfectly “natural” phenomenon, when in fact , most people — if they’re being honest, find it thoroughly unnatural.
During the interview phase of the White woman who spawned several racially-mixed children from 3 different absentee sperm-donors, there was no mention how she financially supported her mixed-race brood. The question was carefully avoided by the BBC, so it’s safe to assume that the British tax slave has the “honour” of keeping her brood afloat.
The BBC is a brainwashing tool of the “New World Order”, and one task is persuading gullible White people to commit racial suicidethrough uncontrolled mass 3rd-world immigration, and thus to race mix their genes.
European Whites account for only 8% of the 7,000,000,000 (BILLION) people on earth. Also 2% of the world’s inhabitants are WHITE women of child-bearing age. Yet, the hidden ANTI-white agenda of breeding the White race out of existence continues unabated.
Bernard Hogan-Howe, the newly appointed state apparatchik in charge of the London Metropolitan
police assures us, that “racists” will be “driven out of the police” whilst revealing that 10 officers are currently under investigation of suspicion of the most “heinous” thought crime of our age.
Last week, writing in the London Evening Standard, former deputy editor of the Independent and sometime speech writer for Prime Minister David Cameron, Ian Birrell snarled that “racist” policemen should be “rooted out”, “prosecuted” and “lose their precious pensions”.
Indeed, Mr Birrell addressed his subject which such furious, staring-eyed zealotry, that one suspects only fear of exposure prevented him from adding that they be transported to some gulag in a remote part of Wales, or the Scottish highlands for forced re-education and recreational rock-breaking.
Meanwhile, a young man still languishes in prison for the offence ofsending an ideologically-incorrect tweet, whilst the one-time captain of the England soccer team, John Terry awaits prosecution for allegedly calling a black footballer “black”, and Terry has already been stripped of his captaincy, showing when it comes to “racism”, an accusation alone is deemed grounds for punishment, whether guilty or not.
Elsewhere, a young mother (Emma West) is out on bail after some informer turned her in via the internet when she expressed an objection to the forced invasion of her homeland.
We are regaled with shocking accounts of racially “insensitive” words, thoughts and deeds. Nightly, earnest young reporters appear on our televisions, and usually standing outside courts, police stations or football fields reporting on some politically incorrect quip as if it were equivalent to the napalm bombing of a hospice. (Which they probably think of its equivalency.)
Across the Atlantic Ocean in America, news channels such as CNN, or “we are Treyvon” as they have probably re-branded themselves by now, have taken to reporting an almost Lewis Carroll-style alternative reality where a man’s colour and ethnicity can be changed at the will of a metanarrative (For example Hispanics and Cherokee Indians can suddenly morph into “evil” White men just to suit an agenda).
Meanwhile alleged “victims” are transformed into angelic twelve year old versions of themselves. All this parallel universe chicanery is performed in an effort to “root out” the very same legendary (White) “racists” who are being hunted down by Commissioner Hogan-Howe and Ian Birrell here (in England).
At the same time hugely popular writers and commentators such Pat Buchananor John Derbyshire, who dare to speak truths which must not be spoken, are summarily dismissed, pilloried and have their livelihoods destroyed.
Of course, we have seen this all before in other times and in other places (U.S.S.R.) where ideological offenders and “thought criminals” were subjected to show trials and highly publicised prosecutions, and then called “enemies of the state“.
Now they are held up as evil, hate-fuelled “enemies of the multicultural fantasy” which has become the obsession of the state.
Now, as then, “thought criminals” must be purged from our institutions and positions of trust, then broken, punished and forced to confess and beg a forgiveness, which is seldom, if ever granted.
Now, as then, victims are judged to be offenders and punished for the crimes committed against them.
Now, just like then, fake realities are created to act both as parables of the new (state) religion, and as truncheons, with which the state can batter its terrorised population into acquiescence.
Just as then, we are required to pay lip service to an orthodoxy which we do not agree with, which frightens us, and which we know to be flawed, and only dare speak our true thoughts to our most trusted friends in hushed tones and in private.
As happened then, abject failures held together only by state terrorism are presented by an obedient and craven state media as glorious “successes”, which fool only those who wish to be fooled, but which few, if any, dare challenge.
What we are seeing, in effect is the Sovietisation of the West.
The Sovietisation of the United Kingdom was the subject with Dr Frank Ellis, then a lecturer at Leeds University, before the university attempted, but failed to purge him for expressing his disobedient views addressed in 2001 following the release of that most Stalinist and Orwellian of documents, The Macpherson report into the murder of Stephen Lawrence.
In his outstanding analysis of the report, Frank Ellis exposed the agenda driven fanaticism and false reality which influenced the Macpherson inquiry and its recommendations. and detailed how its purported attempts to combat racism, were in reality an outright, and so far, successful attack on the existing British society, its native people and our culture.
As Frank Ellis says:
“The near unanimous acceptance of its [the report’s] assumptions and conclusions by the Labour government represents a major victory for those who are striving to undermine long-established British institutions and accomplish the final destruction of the United Kingdom “
When explaining the process of Sovietisation, of which the Macpherson report is part, Dr Ellis describes the fate of the Kulaks, the middle-class Russian peasants who Stalin sought to exterminate, and who, as a result, died in their millions.
On reading this, I then suggested that we, the White race, were being set up as the Kulaks of the 21st Century, and Frank told me that Jared Taylor of American Renaissance had also reached that exact same conclusion.
I leave it to you… to make your own assessment.
Now eleven years on, it is quite striking how relevant Frank’s analysis of the Macpherson report remains today, and how many of Frank’s predictions have come to pass.
Frank’s review of this poisonous document is a very important and valuable resource, which I urge you all to re-read and which I hope Nationalist bloggers will link to.
Because of this, I have given it pride of place, as the first article I have added to a new site which I have set up for Frank’s writings, linked below:
Hear this you of England. Hear this you the people of Europe and of European origin, hear this you the first people of Britain.
You have slept, and whilst you slept men of evil will have worked against you, and their work is almost done. You must awake soon, for if you slumber on their work will be done and those waking dawns left to you will be as bitter as they are few. Look now and see how low they have already brought you.
Look what has already been stolen whilst you slept. Many rights, safe to others, are now DENIED to you. You alone, amongst indigenous peoples, will no longer be permitted to defend your culture, or your people. Not for you are the protections which international bodies grant to the natives of other lands. Unlike them, your claim to your own native land is denied and repudiated by liars.
Those you have elected and those they have appointed will disinherit you, if they can they will destroy you, for it is their aim to destroy you… it is their aim to eradicate and replace you, and they will do so without a qualm.
Evil men ride the soot black steeds of power in your lands and they wish you only ill. They will cut you down, they will burn your history books and replace them with their lies, and then they will do the same to you.
If you do not awake soon you will become a forgotten people, a people denied, a people lost. Day by day the evil ones take more from you, and finally, if they can, they will prise it all from your grip — and what will you have when it is gone?
Hear this you of England — evil men conspire against you — you need only look and their work is clear to see.
“WHY do Euro-White countrieskeep theirfloodgates opento 3rd-world immigrants when so many Canadians, Irishmen, Americans, Australians, New Zealanders, British or other Europeans are unemployed or under-employed??
Frankly, the reasons are NOT about jobs, nor growing our economy, nor replacing the aging workers, nor“helping” poor nations! But, those are the untenable reasons falsely given for maintaining mass NON-white immigration into our predominately White nations.
The more squabbling, the more dis-united, and the more racially incompatible we become … then, all that much better for the hidden rulers who manage this agenda. It’s much easier to divide and rule them (“Order out of Chaos” – Masonic motto) when incompatible foreigners are introduced into stable, White majority countries.
The constant prattle about “employment” and “economic statistics” is just smoke and mirrors used to distract people away from the real goal — which is racial and religious strife at any cost! (Look around you at the ever increasing chaos surrounding you today, compared to the relative domestic peace we experienced up to about 30 years ago.)
To make mass 3rd world, NON-white immigration more attractive and thus more easily acceptable, several “fringe benefits” were attached to the package to help entice the various elements (politics, business, religious, ethnic, and gullible college students) into compliance.
Those “benefits” serve to lure the unsuspecting ‘sheeple‘ into lending their unbridled support for their own suicide mission, and thus leading them to their own DISPLACEMENT.
First, a TEST case was needed
One example of that notion — affirmative-action (“employment-equity” in Canada) —
– and suddenly you W.H.A.Ms know what displacement means when your ability to earn an income is in jeopardy.
I agree with the definition of some multi-culti horn blowers as being “emotionally–afflictedfanatics“.
But that description only applies to the lower-level ‘Useful Idiots‘ or “social justice warriors” who have been indoctrinated to “the cause“. They turn against their own people, including “racist” family members and friends harboring divergent viewpoints from their own.
Those Leftist/liberal fools would be attracted to any trendy fad. They need a cause just forliving, and have no idea they’ve been thoroughly brainwashed with meaningless slogans such as “diversity is strength“, or the “joys of diversity“ and other such brain-numbing drivel.
These Orwellian mantras are repeatedly broadcast into receptive minds — and many sheeple — actually believe these tailor-made lures used to snare the unwitting dupes amongst us. The city of Toronto has even adopted one those phrases for its own use.
However, the sinister ideologues and master manipulators — the real power people who operate behind the scenes, — and who orchestrate social trends that control those “Useful Idiots” (their words) …are by no means wacky or “socially progressive” themselves. They know EXACTLY what they are doing.
Do not underestimate your sinister enemy! This vast worldwide immigration destruction that we see happening before our eyes every day could not be so well planned, so thought-out in every detail, and so impressively effective as it is… if conceived by deranged lunatics.
Unfortunately, the Master Slavers are succeeding with their plans, and they’re aided & abetted by the targeted, unaware White people themselves!
The same power-brokers who led a successful 40-year campaign to topple America’sEuro–sourced (1965) immigration laws were not preoccupied, nor cared one whit about job issues, nor national labor “shortages“. No, the end goal is diluting the White majority population into mis-aligned, fractured units that serve their purposes well enough. The U.S. White majority population has declined from about 90% in 1960… to LESS than 63% today, and soon to 60% White.
CANADA introduced its own official “multiculturalism” (multi-racialism) program, and Australiaabandoned its “White Only” policies during the 1970s. These divergent racial policies were forced upon the nation’s people — not for any benefit of those countries — but simply to create disorder in the lead-up to the cabal’s “New World Order“.
To reiterate… this unprecedented, nation-destroying phenomenon described as mass 3rd world immigration into predominately White-Euro nations has NOTHING to do with employment statistics orjob creation, and never will be (although cheap 3rd-world labor is an added benefit to seduce the owner class); and baffled people striving to understand this ongoing mass 3rd world onslaught in terms of employment… are simply barking up the wrong tree.
There is NO answer to be found there. Wake up, people! That false trail is NOT what this whole NON-white immigrationdisaster is all about!
It’s YOUR displacement that really matters to them.
Ask yourself this question. How was it possible for White-Euro countries to have managed successful economies without the “benefit” of 3rd world immigration before now?? About half the world’s population is illiterate, and live on less than two dollars per day.
Yet, imported3rdworldforeigners have also been duped into believing they’re here to “help us grow” already fully-developed economies in European-based nations! These are the ludicrous excuses used to usher in through Canada’s door — for example — a minimum of 5,000 new immigrants week after week since 1990!
The United States has a mass influx of over one million LEGAL immigrants, plus another million ILLEGAL migrants who cross into to U.S. every year!
That Orwellian illogic makes no sense when many 3rd world hell-holes are struggling to advance their own economies, and that is after exporting our western technology plus our generous monetary aid to their corrupt governments.
Immigrants to Canada cost Canadian tax-payers an astounding $23,000,000,000 (Billion) per year. Immigrants receive that amount in service requirements (e.g. welfare payments, hospital care, etc.) over and above what these foreign arrivals actually pay in taxes.
If Canada was a company that was forced to hire well-over 300,000 “employees” per year just to add to the excess surpluses from previous years … then where are the benefits to the “company”?
If the “company” books declare a consistent net loss due to excess labour… then it should immediately close its doors and declare bankruptcy! There’s no logical business reason to remain open when the “company” suffers a consistent net financial LOSS of upwards to $35 BILLION year after year. But that’s how our immigration “system” works.
Over four decades ago, Feminism was growing in accordance to rules of destroying the family unit, and White Western nations were duped into accepting the “Zero-population Growth” (ZPG) mantraaimed directly atWhitewomen to stop birthing more Whitebabies. Gulliblefeminist dupes took a leading role in helping to shatter our women’s confidence of raising a family of her own people.
At the same, the immigrantfloodgates were pushed wide open to encourage 3rd world nations to emigrate their vast numbers to our traditional White nations!
Our hidden rulers (notelected politicians beholden to their masters) initiated this process of importing a more dumbed-down, and more manageable disunited populace in our once-thriving, and stablehomogeneous nations. This agenda has been in the planning stages for at least 100 years… read about “A Racial Program for the 20th Century“.
Mass 3rd-World Immigration is GENOCIDE Against European White Nations
I, (William Borst) was recently discussing the tax system with my attorney who had just completed my mother’s estate.
He had no idea that Karl Marx had written the major elements in the (U.S.) tax code with which he had been working his entire professional life. All one has to do is read the Communist Manifesto, written by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels in 1848.
The fact that an educated, sophisticated man — such as my lawyer — had been totally unaware of this fact, speaks volumes about the vast majority of Americans. As Yankee manager Casey Stengel used to say, “You could look it up!“
Most Americans believe that when the BerlinWall went down with a thundering crash in 1989, it marked the end of the bloody ogre that had enslaved half of Europefor over forty years.
They believe that the country has nothing to fear from Communismany more. They have been conditioned to believe that the anti-Communism crusade of the 1950s was nothing more than paranoid ranting of Wisconsin Senator Joseph McCarthy.
The fact is COMMUNISM is still very much alive and thriving in this country. It has taken on a more subtle, destructive guise.
The situation is analogous to the frog that is put into a pot of tepid water. If the cook were to quickly increase the temperature of the water, the frog would quickly jump out to safety. But the smart cook increases the temperature only gradually, so that the poor frog does not realize it is being slowly but surely boiled to death. William Lederer once referred to America as a “nationofsheep.” I believe Americais more a nation of frogs.
How did this happen? The place to start is with the writings of a Sardinian intellectual,Antonio Gramsci.
Born in the village of Ales on the island of Sardinia in 1891, Gramsci became the most successful interpreter of Marxism. He left Sardinia for the mainland where he studied philosophy and history at the University of Turin. In 1919 he founded a newspaper in Italy, the L’Ordinine Nuovo, or the New Order. In 1921 with Palmiro Togliatti, Gramsci founded the Italian Communist party.
When Italy adopted Mussolini’s fascism, Gramsci fled to Russia where he analyzed Lenin’s adaptation of Communism. He was profoundly disturbed that Communist Russia failed to show any great interest in a “workers’ paradise.”
Gramsci clearly understood that the Russian ruling class had maintained its hold on the workers by resorting to sheer terror and mass extermination. Communism had merely replaced one with the other.
After Lenin’s death and ensuing struggle for power, even Russia became a dangerous place for Gramsci. Lenin’s successor Stalin eliminated anyone suspected of deviation from his party line.
Gramsci returned to Italy to struggle against Mussolini, was arrested as a likely agent of a foreign power, and imprisoned in 1926. He spent the remaining years of his life expounding on his philosophy. It was here that he wrote Prison Notebooks and Letters from Prison, which have become extremely influential on the college campus. When he died after being released in 1937, he had produced a total of nine volumes on history, sociology and Marxist theory.
Since economic Marxism was a failure, Gramsci reasoned that the only way to topple the repressive Western institutions was by, what he called, a “long march through the culture.”
He repackaged Marxism in terms of a bona fide “cultural war,” not its doctrinaire class struggle. He was well aware that most people did not believe in the Communist system.
Their Christian faith was the big obstacle, preventing the necessary leap to Communism. Gramsci knew that the civilized world had been thoroughly indoctrinated with Christianity for 2000 years, so much so that civilization and Christianity were inexorably bound.
It was the Christian character of the West that had provided an almost impenetrable barrier to infiltration. More than an opiate, religion was the peasants’ lifeline that helped them endure the harsh realities of life. According to Pat Buchanan’s book, The Death of the West, Christianity was the “heat shield of capitalism.” To capture the West, Marxists “must first de-Christianize the West,” that is, destroy its religious foundations.
DE-CHRISTIANIZE THE WEST
Gramsci hated marriage and the family, the very founding blocks of a civilized society.
To him, marriage was a plot, a conspiracy if you would, to perpetuate an evil system that oppressed women and children. It was a dangerous institution, characterized by violence and exploitation, the forerunner of fascism and tyranny.
Patriarchy served as the main target of the cultural Marxists. They strove to feminize the family with legions of single and homosexual mothers and “fathers,” who would serve to weaken the structure of civilized society.
It was another cultural Marxist who brought the Gramascian strategy into the schools. George Lukacswas a wealthy Hungarian banker. He was reputed to have been the most brilliant theorist since Marx himself. Echoing the future sentiments of Jesse Jackson, Lukacs cried out “who will free us from Western civilization?”
As deputy commissioner of culture in Hungary under Bela Kun, his first task was to put in radical sex education in the schools.
He reasoned that this was the best way to destroy traditional sexual morality, and weaken the family. Hungarian children learned the subtle nuances of free love, sexual intercourse, and the archaic nature of middle-class family codes, the obsolete nature of monogamy, and the irrelevance of organized religion which deprived man of pleasure.
Children were urged to deride and ignore the authority of parental authority, and precepts of traditional morality. If this sounds familiar, it is because this is what is happening in our public and even some Catholic schools today. Lukacs was the forerunner of President Clinton’s libidinous Surgeon General, Jocelyn Elders.
Gramsci’s and Lukacs‘ ideas came to fruition through the Frankfurt School, or Institute of Social Research, as it was originally called in the 1920s. They translated Marxism from economics into culture terms. One of the keys in the Frankfurt School was to merge Marxist analysis with Freudian psychoanalysis and psychological conditioning (brainwashing).
According to their Freudian and Marxist amalgamation, just as under capitalism, the working class was automatically oppressed. So, under Western culture, blacks, homosexuals, Hispanics and women (everybody, but evil white males) were automatically the collective targets of Western oppression.
The notion of group-solidarity, or what is called “identity politics” was designed to create nothing but division, leading to violence and social anarchy.
In order to undermine Western society, the cultural Marxists would constantly repeat the charges that the West was guilty of genocidal crimes against each and every civilization that it had ever encountered throughout its history, and the historical oppressions of mankind.
This idea evolved into “Critical Theory,” which has served the left as its main weapon in the battle for the soul of American culture. The “Crits” employed destructive criticism of the main pillars of Western civilization, including Christianity, capitalism, authority, the family, morality, tradition , sexual restraint, loyalty, patriotism, nationalism, heredity, ethnocentrism, convention, Conservatism and especially the language.
Critical Theory, which is endemic to all the major law schools in the country, holds that the patriarchal social structure should be replaced with matriarchy.
The belief that men and women are different, and have properly defined roles, would be replaced with androgyny and the heterodox belief that homosexuality is normal. The differences between the genders, not sexes, had to be minimized. According to Marxist feminists men and women were fungible. That is they could be easily interchanged. Genders’ differences were nothing more than mere “anatomical accidents”.
Another key ingredient in Cultural Marxism was Theodor Adorno‘s idea of the “Authoritarian Personality.”
His book, which he published with Else Frenkel-Brunswick, Daniel J. Levinson, and R. Nevitt Sanford in 1950, was premised on the singular principle that Christianity, Capitalism, and the patriarchal or authoritarian family created a character susceptible to racial prejudice and fascism.
To them anyone who upheld the old traditional standards had an authoritarian personality that was basically fascist in nature. If, a family adhered to Christian and capitalist principles, the children would most likely grow up to be “fascists” and “racists”.
Pat Buchanan called Adorno’s book, “the altarpiece of the Frankfurt School.” If fascism and racism are endemic to the culture, as Adorno believed, everyone who was raised in the traditions of God, motherhood, and family becomes in need of a psychological help.
This is Orwellian logic that seems to have already established a beachhead in the American consciousness. Cultural determinism had replaced Marx’s economic determinism.
Political correctness is the key to understanding the plight of the American culture since the dawning of the sixties. P.C. represents the lead vehicle through which the Marxist mind has driven its cancerous ideas in undermining the genius of American politics and culture.
Under the rubric of “diversity,” its hidden goal is to impose a uniformity of thought and behavior on all Americans. The cultural Marxists, often teachers, university professors and administrators, ‘TV producers, newspaper editors and the like, serve as gatekeepers by keeping all traditional and positive ideas, especially religious ideas, out of the public marketplace. One can easily see that happening in our society every day.
Probably the most important member of the Frankfurt School was Herbert Marcuse. He was largely responsible for bringing Cultural Marxism to the United States, when he moved to New York City to escape the Nazi persecution in the thirties. In the 1960s he became the guru of the New Left while a professor at University of California at San Diego.
Marcus was a full-blooded social revolutionary who contemplated the disintegration of American society, just as Karl Marx and Georg Lukacs contemplated the destruction of German society.
In his book, An Essay on Liberation, Marcuse proclaimed the means for transforming American society. He believed that all taboos, especially sexual ones, should be relaxed.
“Make love, not War!” was his battle cry that echoed through the ivy-covered college campuses all over America. His methodology for rebellion included the deconstruction of the language, the infamous “what does ‘is’ mean?” which fostered the destruction of the culture.
By confusing and obliterating word meanings, he helped cause a breakdown in the social conformity of the nation, especially among the more uninformed young of America. He deliberately acerbated race relations by emphasizing the idea that White men were all guilty for slavery, and Blacks could do no wrong.
These cultural revolutionaries were faced with a serious question raised by the Graniascian shift. If the proletariat was not the basis of the revolution… what was? Marcuse said that women should be the cultural proletariat who transformed Western society. They would serve as the catalyst for the new Marxist Revolution.
If women could be persuaded to leave their traditional roles as the transmitters of culture, then the traditional culture could not be transmitted to the next generation. The idea that “the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world,” is no idle statement.
What better way to influence the generations to come than by subverting the traditional roles of women? The Marxists rightfully reasoned that the undermining of women could deal a deadly blow to the culture.
One of the heirs to this cultural strategy was Betty Friedan, the former Naomi Goldstein.
Her book, The Feminine Mystique, served as the textbook in sabotaging the American family. Friedan described the traditional housewife as a “parasite”, who was forced to deny her true nature. To Friedan, the stay-at-home mom was a mindless robot devoid of a real brain. Though she was not a member of the Frankfurt School, Friedan’s hatred and disdain for men and patriarchy, made her the “godmother” of radical feminism.”
The subversion of the family, and the decline of respect for patriarchy, has led to the increased feminization of the nation’s cultural institutions, including the churches, schools, and universities, political parties and even the military and our police forces.
“Modern man” resembles more like the saccharine sensitivity of an Alan Alda than the lusty bravado of a John Wayne.
According to Carolyn Graglia‘s book Domestic Tranquility, the “editors at Playboy (Magazine) could not have orchestrated the women’s movement” any better.
If women were the target, then the Cultural Marxists scored a bull’s-eye. Today women unrealistically aspire to anything a man does, from being a fighter pilot, a combat soldier, policemen, firemen, priests, boxers, and several jobs that require manly strength or a masculine disposition, and even the presidency. They have lowered themselves from their lofty pedestals and sacrificed their natural moral superiority to men on the altar of equality and choice.
Women have traded the domestic tranquility of family and the home for the power surge of the boardroom, and the sweaty release of casual sex. Divorce court statistics, wife and child abandonment, abortion and even spousal murder can be laid at Betty Friedan’s doorstep to a large degree.
This has not happened like the Biblical “thief in the night.” It has been a gradual process, as Americans lay fat and lazy on their lily pads, watching Oprah, or the next “big game”.
To paraphrase T. S. Eliot, our civilization will end, not with a big bang, but with a faint croak…. if we do not do something now. –Source–